396:. It is a mix of encyclopedic information and advertising. The only real issue here is whether the article should have been speedily deleted, not how to improve it or whether it should be in article space. It would be reasonable to give the author a choice of draftifying it and taking it through AFC or of trying to improve it in article space, in which case it may be either whacked at or nominated for AFD. This is not the forum to improve the article, only to avoid its speedy deletion.
342:. Completely removed the section - Author of scientific articles and books. I think that it is not needed in the article. I also removed your remark and removed the offer to serve in the army. Highlighted with wiki links films that were on Knowledge. There he is also listed as a producer in the template of each article. I am ready to further correct the article. Please tell me how I can still correct the text. Thanks.
477:- not a great article, reads too much like a resume, but it's not overly promotional; it doesn't really contain any promotional language (puffery) or claims; just doesn't rise to the level of meriting speedy deletion. Someone can take it to AFD if they think the subject is not notable, or they can edit the article if they think it needs improvement.
211:
The deleted version was rather too much of a resume. If I had noticed it I would probably draftified it. I don't think it really had a G11 level of promotion, but it was not a well-written article. There should But if the statements included are accurate (I can't verify the sources in
Russian) this
81:
Opinions are divided about whether the deletion should simply be overturned, or whether the content should be sent to draftspace instead. As per the closing instructions, a lack of consensus regarding a speedy deletion means that it should be undone. Editors are free to submit the article to AfD
281:
that influence by citing and quoting independent reviews, or stats on how often these papers are cited, or both. If there are high-quality
English-language citations, some should be used. Provide translations of the titles and names of publications of non-English-language sources. And the help
179:
The article was quickly removed for publicity. I unsubscribed on the article discussion page when I saw the deletion template, but no one gave any explanations and the article was deleted. There was no advertisement in the text, if the nominee did not like some of the phrases, it will not be
456:, it might get fixed, or it might get kept (which would be a bit sad, but not crazy). But it is mostly just a list of facts. Not a great article, and certainly too much like a resume, but not all things start out perfect. Are their known or suspected
268:. After that, it depends on how this discussion is closed. But it is not just "some of the phrases" There need to be better sources, and it needs to read like an encyclopedia article, not a resume or a social media profile.
272:
is irrelevant and should go. The bulleted list of unreferened films and TV series should be at the least referenced, and preferably some paragraphs of prose added about at least some of these productions, bases on
155:
413:- an actual article might be possible (this was not it). Sure, it was crappy, misshapen and somewhat promotional but nowhere near the level justifying a speedy deletion. --
170:
48:
34:
43:
308:
restoration is only to allow people in this discussion to see what the deleted article was like, it should not be edited at all during the discussion.
212:
person was probably notable. There should be no bar to creating a better version, preferably in draft space, or to undeleting and draftifing. So
125:
39:
367:
There is a valid claim for notability and does not appear to be overly promotional. I recommend sending it to AFC for review. --
277:
sources. The section on "Author of scientific articles and books" should select the more significant and influential ones, and
121:
70:
481:
314:
292:
226:
201:
324:
Can I edit the text in the recovered version of the article? Or do I need to wait for the outcome here, and only then edit?
21:
236:
Thanks for the restoration. Please tell me, can you restore the text to the article and help remove advertising phrases?
498:
401:
105:
17:
487:
469:
444:
425:
405:
376:
351:
333:
319:
297:
259:
250:
I ask experienced participants for help. If someone has time, please help me correct the text. Many thanks.
245:
231:
206:
189:
94:
420:
397:
339:
484:
312:
290:
224:
199:
180:
difficult to delete them. The article is significant, please consider its restoration. Thanks.
372:
347:
329:
255:
241:
185:
465:
414:
389:
85:
478:
457:
453:
440:
393:
385:
309:
287:
221:
196:
76:
368:
343:
325:
274:
265:
251:
237:
181:
461:
384:- The issue here is whether the article should have been speedily deleted as
435:
286:
could offer is limited because I can't read the sources.
162:
148:
140:
132:
433:
I have my doubts here, but thre's no harm in trying.
270:
From 1987 to 1989 – served in Border troops in USSR.
452:send to AfD if you will. It might die there via
8:
104:The following is an archived debate of the
63:
269:
264:Not while this review is in progress,
7:
501:of the page listed in the heading.
195:I have temporarily undeleted this.
28:
497:The above is an archive of the
122:Rafael Mikhailovich Minasbekyan
71:Rafael Mikhailovich Minasbekyan
488:22:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
470:02:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
445:06:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
426:04:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
406:15:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
377:15:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
352:13:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
334:04:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
320:22:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
298:22:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
260:20:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
246:18:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
232:18:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
207:18:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
190:11:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
338:Please pay attention to my
95:08:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
79:speedy deletion overturned.
524:
388:. It is not exclusively
18:Knowledge:Deletion review
504:Please do not modify it.
111:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
411:Revert and draftify
108:of the page above.
365:Restore recreation
511:
510:
316:DESiegel Contribs
294:DESiegel Contribs
228:DESiegel Contribs
203:DESiegel Contribs
93:
59:27 September 2020
49:2020 September 28
35:2020 September 26
515:
506:
423:
417:
214:allow recreation
175:
173:
165:
151:
143:
135:
113:
92:
90:
83:
64:
53:
33:
523:
522:
518:
517:
516:
514:
513:
512:
502:
499:deletion review
475:Overturn speedy
450:Overturn speedy
421:
415:
398:Robert McClenon
317:
295:
229:
204:
169:
167:
161:
160:
154:
147:
146:
139:
138:
131:
130:
109:
106:deletion review
86:
84:
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
521:
519:
509:
508:
493:
492:
491:
490:
472:
447:
428:
408:
379:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
336:
315:
302:
301:
300:
293:
248:
227:
209:
202:
177:
176:
158:
152:
144:
136:
128:
116:
115:
100:
99:
98:
97:
61:
56:
47:
44:2020 September
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
520:
507:
505:
500:
495:
494:
489:
486:
483:
480:
476:
473:
471:
467:
463:
460:issues here?
459:
455:
451:
448:
446:
442:
438:
437:
432:
429:
427:
424:
418:
412:
409:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
380:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
335:
331:
327:
323:
322:
321:
318:
313:
311:
307:
303:
299:
296:
291:
289:
285:
280:
276:
271:
267:
263:
262:
261:
257:
253:
249:
247:
243:
239:
235:
234:
233:
230:
225:
223:
219:
215:
210:
208:
205:
200:
198:
194:
193:
192:
191:
187:
183:
172:
164:
157:
150:
142:
134:
127:
123:
120:
119:
118:
117:
114:
112:
107:
102:
101:
96:
91:
89:
80:
78:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
41:
36:
23:
19:
503:
496:
474:
449:
434:
430:
410:
382:Overturn G11
381:
364:
360:
305:
283:
278:
217:
213:
178:
110:
103:
87:
75:
69:
58:
416:Orange Mike
394:advertising
390:promotional
279:demonstrate
275:independent
88:Sandstein
306:temporary
431:Draftify
361:Draftify
218:draftify
20: |
369:Enos733
344:Namerst
340:sandbox
326:Namerst
266:Namerst
252:Namerst
238:Namerst
182:Namerst
171:restore
141:history
82:again.
458:WP:COI
454:WP:TNT
77:WP:G11
462:Hobit
441:talk
163:watch
156:links
52:: -->
16:<
466:talk
422:Talk
402:talk
373:talk
348:talk
330:talk
304:The
256:talk
242:talk
186:talk
149:logs
133:edit
126:talk
32:<
485:ich
482:v!v
436:DGG
392:or
386:G11
363:or
310:DES
288:DES
222:DES
216:or
197:DES
22:Log
479:Le
468:)
443:)
419:|
404:)
375:)
350:)
332:)
258:)
244:)
220:.
188:)
74:–
42::
464:(
439:(
400:(
371:(
346:(
328:(
284:I
254:(
240:(
184:(
174:)
168:(
166:)
159:|
153:|
145:|
137:|
129:|
124:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.