120:
286:
42:
105:
274:
Knowledge editors resolve a lack of consensus through an exchange of information leading to persuasion and compromise. Reverting an edit shows there is no consensus. Saying "no consensus" in the edit summary adds no new information. Worse, it forces the reverted editor to begin a talk page discussion
519:
to assure that editor is active and has had a fair chance to respond. If so, post a follow up message with a ping and text such as "it appears from your silence that you no longer object to the edit you reverted. If that is not the case then please reply to my post within the next three days." If
356:
A reverting editor asserting a lack of consensus has the responsibility to show a prior consensus or current discussion. If an edit really does break a specific, established consensus then you should provide a link to the talk page section, FAQ set, policy, or other written page establishing that
542:
as requiring an affirmative consensus for
Knowledge edits. Can I find that requirement somewhere else? Also, would you please tell me whether you have any other reason for your revert?" If the editor claims special procedures apply to Knowledge policy, guideline, or essay page edits, substitute
2953:
993:
469:
If you have considered alternatives and concluded that a reversion is appropriate, be sure to provide a substantive explanation in the edit summary or on the talk page. Even if the reason seems obvious to you, it will not always be obvious to someone else.
2154:
403:
Don't assert "no consensus" because you believe others might object to an edit. Let those editors do their own reverting, then the original contributor will know who disagrees with the edit and why. Or perhaps no one will object because, in fact, a
1558:
1023:
497:
start a discussion on talk. No, you shouldn't have to do it. And yes, it's a pain. But it's the best path to a civil resolution of the dispute. Use a
Subject/headline such as "Revert of January 5, 2021", start the text with a
2289:
2840:
430:
to take a moment and rescue a deficient good faith edit. If an edit adds good information but has poor grammar, is poorly sourced, or poorly worded, try to fix the grammar, find a good source, or improve the wording. Avoid
2720:
1892:
2249:
2058:
1653:
527:(or some variant) on talk, respond with something like "I am here now hoping to work with you toward a consensus. Would you please tell me what, if anything, you find objectionable about the change you reverted?"
3093:
2401:
1038:
3103:
364:
If you can't link to a talk page section, FAQ set, policy, or other written page establishing a consensus then consider the following alternatives to asserting "no consensus" as the reason for your revert.
3369:
3364:
2655:
1360:
3033:
2780:
2845:
705:
3158:
1458:
3143:
2893:
1433:
161:
If, in fact, the original text was the result of a consensus reached in a prior discussion (or is the subject of a current dispute) then include a link to that discussion in your edit summary.
1488:
1185:
3163:
2570:
1756:
1210:
1133:
715:
2610:
2590:
1553:
1523:
835:
1847:
1573:
1335:
850:
790:
765:
755:
923:
3308:
1255:
221:
it until more editors comment or edit, or until the two editors in question achieve a consensus. Thus, a single editor's objection does not establish "no consensus" for a change.
179:
If one of your edits draws a "no consensus" edit summary, start a conversation on the talk page and ask the reverting editor to provide a substantive rationale for the reversion.
2615:
2695:
2650:
2560:
2510:
1776:
1503:
1478:
146:", or something similar. This procedural objection gives the reverted editor no information regarding the substantive reason for your reversion and is not supported by either
3203:
1493:
1128:
1113:
614:
2530:
1093:
3417:
2685:
2600:
1716:
1568:
1473:
1088:
1048:
903:
3313:
2406:
2319:
1917:
1658:
1483:
1408:
1143:
1118:
1043:
825:
655:
2294:
2239:
2224:
2740:
2690:
2545:
1837:
1175:
1058:
938:
508:
to the reverting editor, and then add text along the lines of "Please provide the substantive rationale for your reversion." Don't forget to sign your post (~~~~).
384:
If you can't name a specific problem with an edit, you have no valid reason to immediately revert it. Reverting solely on the basis of "no consensus" suggests you
3273:
1902:
1648:
1385:
1310:
880:
1957:
392:
against innovation and new perspectives. If you just have a bad gut feeling about the edit, consider seeking input from other experienced editors at appropriate
3168:
2820:
2665:
2585:
2254:
2003:
1932:
1786:
1083:
3213:
2770:
1977:
1468:
1355:
1345:
1235:
1138:
1123:
481:
2755:
2725:
2535:
2284:
2279:
1816:
1265:
1220:
1150:
575:
3068:
1513:
888:
602:
3023:
2898:
918:
520:
you get no reply within three more days then revert the reversion "per talk". If you get a substantive reply, work with the user to reach a consensus.
3456:
2785:
2500:
1897:
1583:
1365:
1350:
1195:
1108:
725:
710:
3374:
3293:
2675:
2635:
2349:
1972:
1962:
1882:
1398:
1300:
1230:
1018:
2018:
3153:
2515:
1952:
1698:
1190:
870:
730:
2314:
2259:
2229:
700:
2983:
2903:
1766:
1643:
860:
3298:
3268:
3263:
3058:
3038:
2835:
2595:
2264:
2219:
2214:
2023:
1907:
1811:
1548:
1260:
1205:
1160:
1098:
1068:
973:
963:
735:
559:
2580:
1180:
3233:
3108:
2958:
2680:
2376:
2184:
2063:
1912:
1508:
1330:
1280:
820:
377:
3248:
3188:
3113:
2605:
2575:
2495:
2324:
1295:
1285:
1250:
1063:
968:
690:
3258:
3123:
3098:
3078:
2978:
2750:
2209:
2118:
2078:
1982:
1638:
1623:
1498:
1103:
953:
908:
865:
840:
800:
650:
236:
57:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3400:
3228:
3208:
3133:
3128:
2700:
2189:
1832:
1741:
1603:
1538:
1448:
1438:
1413:
1375:
1370:
1305:
1073:
1033:
978:
485:
446:
332:
289:
58:
1686:
2304:
1796:
3422:
3288:
2825:
2113:
2098:
2013:
1588:
933:
680:
675:
3218:
3028:
2998:
2963:
2790:
2269:
2179:
2093:
1736:
1706:
1578:
760:
405:
385:
335:
employ this strategy to create the appearance of a substantive dispute regarding a change when little or none actually exists.
275:
just to find out the real reason for the revert. This hampers consensus-building by adding an unnecessary step to the process.
261:. Editors should not implement either of these procedural practices without an accompanying substantive objection to a change.
3384:
3253:
3083:
2810:
2710:
2520:
2396:
2309:
2274:
2199:
2169:
2033:
1867:
1857:
1806:
1633:
1618:
1543:
1315:
1165:
1008:
795:
740:
665:
595:
432:
358:
1967:
2299:
2194:
2159:
988:
17:
3359:
3173:
3088:
2850:
2795:
2715:
2670:
2625:
2620:
2505:
2339:
2134:
1842:
1663:
1443:
1418:
1325:
1320:
1200:
913:
830:
745:
660:
2234:
3461:
3410:
3183:
3063:
2943:
2918:
2745:
2381:
2344:
2334:
1937:
1877:
1731:
1028:
1003:
958:
855:
810:
785:
775:
750:
450:
3303:
3118:
3003:
2928:
2815:
2735:
2705:
2555:
2174:
2144:
2108:
1998:
1862:
1781:
1563:
1428:
1393:
1240:
998:
948:
943:
670:
1726:
314:
3405:
3354:
2993:
2988:
2948:
2933:
2923:
2800:
2645:
2550:
2053:
2043:
1942:
1751:
1613:
898:
770:
279:
3451:
3379:
3336:
3148:
3013:
2913:
2873:
2830:
2775:
2765:
2760:
2730:
2565:
2540:
2525:
2480:
2366:
2088:
2028:
1761:
1598:
1533:
1528:
1518:
1270:
893:
645:
627:
588:
113:
If the only thing you have to say about a
Knowledge edit is that it lacks consensus, it's best to not revert it.
3053:
3008:
2371:
2244:
2204:
2008:
1746:
1275:
720:
306:
from
Knowledge in frustration. If you don't have the time to edit courteously then you should not edit at all.
3283:
3223:
3198:
3138:
3048:
3043:
2630:
2447:
2149:
2139:
1927:
1922:
1340:
1013:
983:
815:
548:
535:
516:
417:
172:
147:
190:
Saying "no consensus" tells the reverted editor that you disagree with the change, but it doesn't say why.
3243:
3193:
2973:
2968:
2938:
2427:
2391:
2386:
2083:
1887:
1721:
1245:
1078:
1053:
928:
489:
393:
265:
225:
164:
If, on the other hand, there is no consensus because you disagree with the change then keep in mind that
3238:
2805:
2660:
2073:
2068:
1852:
1771:
1628:
1290:
397:
210:
695:
3178:
2640:
2437:
2361:
1225:
1170:
1155:
685:
28:
341:
An editor with a valid objection who reverts with a "no consensus" edit summary is just plain lazy.
3278:
2888:
2457:
2432:
2411:
1791:
1423:
1215:
780:
247:
128:
62:
303:
2452:
2442:
2356:
2329:
1593:
845:
427:
421:
310:
72:
443:
If the edit can be corrected but you can't think of or don't have the time to implement a fix -
2908:
1872:
1711:
1608:
805:
389:
328:
232:
133:
2164:
2048:
2038:
1947:
611:
544:
539:
464:
322:
240:
213:. If one editor favors a change and another opposes it then consensus is no closer to being
151:
119:
50:
1801:
563:
285:
251:
455:(2) If the tag is not self-explanatory (such as ), state your concerns on the talk page.
3073:
3018:
2103:
1403:
258:
302:
the article and does not respect the reverted editor's right to edit it. This conduct
3445:
2954:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
502:
299:
203:
165:
65:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
486:
Knowledge:Status quo stonewalling § How to discourage status quo stonewalling
2155:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
558:, you have reached an impasse. It’s time to consider the options listed at
580:
1559:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
490:
Knowledge:Edit warring § What to do if you see edit-warring behavior
168:. Explain why you disagree in the edit summary or on the talk page.
284:
118:
1024:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
534:
with your change, reply with text such as "I do not read either
3334:
2871:
2478:
1684:
625:
584:
2841:
Knowledge is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
171:
Or better still, don't revert. Instead, make your own edit to
99:
36:
2721:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
1893:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
231:
Implicit consensus exists only in the absence of a dispute.
157:
Consider these alternatives to a no consensus edit summary:
18:
Knowledge:Don't revert due to "no consensus"
2250:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2059:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1654:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
994:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
241:
no exception to this principle for policies and guidelines
327:
Reverting with "no consensus" edit summaries discourages
235:. Hence, the fact that pre-existing text is pre-existing
3094:
How many
Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
123:
There seems to be no consensus amongst these referees...
3104:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
87:
80:
2656:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2290:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
1361:
Knowledge is not being written in an organized fashion
2402:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1039:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
298:
A substance-free revert implies the reverting editor
706:
Editing
Knowledge is like visiting a foreign country
3393:
3347:
2420:
2127:
1991:
1825:
1697:
1457:
1384:
879:
638:
3365:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3144:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
628:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
1489:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
1434:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1186:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
3164:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
2894:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
2571:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1211:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
716:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
474:How to respond to a "no consensus" edit summary
2846:Knowledge is not the place to post your résumé
2591:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
1757:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
1524:Counting and sorting are not original research
183:The problem with a "no consensus" edit summary
1554:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
836:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
596:
345:Alternatives to a "no consensus" edit summary
331:, which are essential to building Knowledge.
8:
3084:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
1848:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
1574:How to save an article proposed for deletion
851:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
791:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
766:Not editing because of Knowledge restriction
482:Knowledge:Responding to a failure to discuss
254:if the discussion fails to reach consensus.
2616:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
1336:Understanding Knowledge's content standards
532:claims other editors must express agreement
515:within three days then, on the fourth day,
422:behavioral guideline regarding minor errors
3344:
3331:
3309:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
2881:
2868:
2696:Notability is not relevance or reliability
2651:News coverage does not decrease notability
2561:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
2511:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
2488:
2475:
1694:
1681:
1504:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
1479:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
635:
622:
603:
589:
581:
576:Knowledge:Don't revert without explanation
3204:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
1494:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1114:Identifying and using independent sources
3370:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
2531:Big events make key participants notable
1094:Formatting bilateral relations templates
418:"fix problems if you can" editing policy
357:consensus. Even then, keep in mind that
339:Reflects poorly on the reverting editor.
3418:How to contribute to Knowledge guidance
3034:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge" as "Wiki"!
2781:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
2686:Notability is not a level playing field
2601:How the presumption of notability works
1717:Contributing to complicated discussions
1569:How the presumption of notability works
1089:Formatting bilateral relations articles
904:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
3314:You should not write meaningless lists
2611:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
1918:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
1659:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
1484:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1049:Don't hope the house will build itself
826:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge
656:All Five Pillars are equally important
2741:One sentence does not an article make
2691:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2407:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2320:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
1838:A weak personal attack is still wrong
1777:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1409:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1176:Minors and persons judged incompetent
939:An unfinished house is a real problem
924:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
352:Provide a link to the prior consensus
7:
3274:Things that should not be surprising
2969:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2295:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2240:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2225:Don't call people by their real name
1903:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1311:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
459:Revert with a meaningful explanation
3169:No one cares about your garage band
2821:What is and is not routine coverage
2666:No one cares about your garage band
2586:Existence does not prove notability
2004:Assume the assumption of good faith
1933:There is no Divine Right of Editors
1787:Relationships with academic editors
1649:Why was the page I created deleted?
1084:Featured articles may have problems
439:Insert a tag and start a discussion
426:It's easy to revert, but it's more
296:Discourteous to good faith editors.
3214:Please do not murder the newcomers
2771:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2255:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
1978:Knowledge should not be a monopoly
1469:Adjectives in your recommendations
1356:Knowledge is not a reliable source
1346:What an article should not include
1236:The problem with elegant variation
1044:Don't get hung up on minor details
63:thoroughly vetted by the community
59:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
2536:Businesses with a single location
1817:You have a right to remain silent
1266:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1221:Potential, not just current state
1151:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
447:Knowledge:Template index/Disputes
3457:Knowledge essays about consensus
2285:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2280:Don't ignore community consensus
1514:Confusing arguments mean nothing
206:fails to result in a consensus.
103:
40:
2786:Sources must be out-of-universe
2501:All high schools can be notable
1898:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
1584:Identifying blatant advertising
1366:The world will not end tomorrow
1351:Knowledge is a work in progress
1196:Not everything needs a template
1109:How to write a featured article
726:External criticism of Knowledge
711:Editors will sometimes be wrong
523:If the reverting editor simply
453:(such as ) on the article page.
3375:Avoid writing redundant essays
3294:What Knowledge is not/Outtakes
3024:Don't stuff beans up your nose
2899:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
2726:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
2676:Notability cannot be purchased
2636:Masking the lack of notability
1973:Knowledge is not about winning
1399:Copyediting reception sections
1301:Temporary versions of articles
1231:Principle of Some Astonishment
1019:Creating controversial content
919:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
560:WP:Dispute resolution requests
361:, and it may have done so.
359:Knowledge:Consensus can change
1:
3401:About policies and guidelines
3154:List of jokes about Knowledge
2516:Articles with a single source
1963:Two wrongs don't make a right
1953:The rules of polite discourse
1883:It's not the end of the world
1644:Knowledge is not Whack-A-Mole
1191:Not everything needs a navbox
1059:Don't "teach the controversy"
871:Knowledge is not RationalWiki
731:Here to build an encyclopedia
556:none of these strategies work
246:That said, the existing text
2984:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
2904:Alternatives to edit warring
1767:Maintaining a friendly space
861:Knowledge is an encyclopedia
386:simply did not like the edit
239:during discussion. There is
3269:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3264:The first rule of Knowledge
3059:Editing under the influence
2836:Knowledge is not Crunchbase
2596:Google searches and numbers
2315:Don't template the regulars
2230:Don't call the kettle black
2024:Be excellent to one another
1908:Revert notification opt-out
1812:We are all Wikipedians here
1261:Put a little effort into it
1206:Obtain peer review comments
1161:Introduction to structurism
1099:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1069:Editors are not mindreaders
974:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
964:Beef up that first revision
736:Leave it to the experienced
701:Don't search for objections
408:exists to keep the change.
272:Impedes consensus-building.
248:ordinarily remains in place
196:"No consensus" occurs only
3478:
3299:Why not create an account?
3234:Requirements for adminship
3109:How to vandalize correctly
3039:Don't delete the main page
2959:Avoid using preview button
2681:Notability comparison test
2265:Don't fight fire with fire
2260:Don't eat the troll's food
2220:Don't call a spade a spade
2215:Don't bludgeon the process
2064:Encourage full discussions
1913:Shadowless Fists of Death!
1549:Don't attack the nominator
1509:But there must be sources!
1331:Try not to leave it a stub
1281:Source your plot summaries
479:
462:
415:
378:Revert only when necessary
136:saying only "no consensus"
70:
34:Essay on editing Knowledge
26:
3343:
3330:
3249:Sarcasm is really helpful
3189:Notability is not eternal
3114:How to win a citation war
2884:
2880:
2867:
2576:Every snowflake is unique
2496:Advanced source searching
2491:
2487:
2474:
2377:No, you can't have a pony
2325:Do not insult the vandals
2185:Don't be high-maintenance
1742:Encouraging the newcomers
1693:
1680:
1286:Specialized-style fallacy
1251:Pruning article revisions
1079:Endorsements (commercial)
1064:Editing on mobile devices
969:Blind men and an elephant
944:Articles have a half-life
691:Dissent is not disloyalty
661:Avoid vague introductions
634:
621:
3259:The Night Before Wikimas
3124:Ignore every single rule
3099:How to get away with UPE
2979:Before they were notable
2751:Overreliance upon Google
2546:Common sourcing mistakes
2119:Settle the process first
2079:Imagine others complexly
1983:Writing for the opponent
1958:There is no common sense
1639:Unopposed AFD discussion
1624:Relisting can be abusive
1499:Avoid repeated arguments
1104:Give an article a chance
954:Avoid mission statements
914:Advanced text formatting
909:Advanced article editing
866:Knowledge is a community
841:The rules are principles
801:Product, process, policy
651:Articles must be written
530:If the reverting editor
517:check user contributions
511:If the reverting editor
388:. Or, worse, you have a
323:Knowledge editing policy
250:during a discussion and
111:This page in a nutshell:
27:Not to be confused with
3394:Policies and guidelines
3229:Requests for medication
3209:Please bite the newbies
3134:Mess with the templates
2701:Notability means impact
2235:Don't call things cruft
2210:Don't be the Fun Police
2140:Knowledge:Because I can
2019:Avoid the word "vandal"
1833:A thank you never hurts
1604:Liar liar pants on fire
1539:Deletion is not cleanup
1449:Writing better articles
1439:Write the article first
1414:Gender-neutral language
1386:Writing article content
1376:Writing better articles
1371:Write the article first
1306:Tertiary-source fallacy
1074:Encourage the newcomers
1034:Dictionaries as sources
979:Build content to endure
445:(1) Put an appropriate
333:Status quo stonewallers
321:Violates the spirit of
290:Don't be a stonewaller.
175:upon the original edit.
3423:Policy writing is hard
3289:Knowledge is an MMORPG
3129:Is that even an essay?
2826:What notability is not
2581:Existence ≠Notability
2190:Don't be inconsiderate
2114:Read before commenting
2099:Mind your own business
2014:Avoid personal remarks
1589:Identifying test edits
934:A navbox on every page
889:100K featured articles
686:Concede lost arguments
681:Competence is required
525:repeats "no consensus"
368:
292:
124:
3219:Pledge of Tranquility
2964:Avoid using wikilinks
2791:Subjective importance
2305:Don't spite your face
2094:Keep it down to earth
1858:Beware of the tigers!
1797:Too long; didn't read
1737:Edit at your own pace
1707:Accepting other users
1474:AfD is not a war zone
821:There is no seniority
761:Neutrality of sources
433:Overzealous deletions
288:
204:good faith discussion
122:
61:, as it has not been
3385:Quote your own essay
3254:Sausages for tasting
3079:Five Fs of Knowledge
3029:Don't-give-a-fuckism
2999:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
2811:Vanispamcruftisement
2711:Notability sub-pages
2521:Avoid template creep
2481:Essays on notability
2397:There are no oracles
2180:Don't be a WikiBigot
2034:Call a spade a spade
1807:Unblock perspectives
1634:The Heymann Standard
1619:Overzealous deletion
1579:I just don't like it
1316:There is no deadline
1181:"Murder of" articles
1009:Common-style fallacy
881:Article construction
796:Process is important
741:Levels of competence
666:Be a reliable source
166:consensus can change
3462:Knowledge reverting
3174:No one really cares
3089:Go ahead, vandalize
2851:Two prongs of merit
2796:Third-party sources
2716:Notabilitymandering
2671:No one really cares
2626:Inherent notability
2621:Independent sources
2506:Alternative outlets
2340:Nationalist editing
2310:Don't take the bait
2275:Don't help too much
2200:Don't be prejudiced
2170:Don't be an ostrich
2135:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
1868:Deletion as revenge
1843:Advice for hotheads
1664:No Encyclopedic Use
1544:Does deletion help?
1444:Writing about women
1326:The deadline is now
1321:There is a deadline
1201:Nothing is in stone
831:Tendentious editing
746:Levels of consensus
304:drives editors away
280:WP:DISCUSSCONSENSUS
3184:No sorcery threats
3064:Embrace Stop Signs
2944:Assume good wraith
2919:Anti-Wikipedianism
2756:Perennial websites
2746:Other stuff exists
2382:Passive aggression
2345:No angry mastodons
2335:Hate is disruptive
2195:Don't be obnoxious
2160:Don't be a fanatic
1938:Most ideas are bad
1878:Forgive and forget
1687:Essays on civility
1296:Run an edit-a-thon
1029:Deprecated sources
1004:Citation underkill
989:Chesterton's fence
959:Be neutral in form
856:Knowledge in brief
811:Reasonability rule
776:Oversimplification
751:Most ideas are bad
329:bold contributions
315:WP:Don't be a jerk
293:
125:
3439:
3438:
3435:
3434:
3431:
3430:
3326:
3325:
3322:
3321:
3304:Yes legal threats
3119:Ignore all essays
3004:Complete bollocks
2929:Asshole John rule
2863:
2862:
2859:
2858:
2816:What BLP1E is not
2736:One hundred words
2706:Notability points
2470:
2469:
2466:
2465:
2270:Don't give a fuck
2145:Civil POV pushing
2109:Mutual withdrawal
1999:Assume good faith
1968:Knowledge clichés
1863:Civility warnings
1782:Please say please
1732:Editors' pronouns
1676:
1675:
1672:
1671:
1564:Follow the leader
1429:Use our own words
1394:Avoid thread mode
1241:Pro and con lists
999:Citation overkill
949:Autosizing images
671:Civil POV pushing
390:Semmelweis reflex
252:commonly prevails
237:carries no weight
117:
116:
98:
97:
16:(Redirected from
3469:
3452:Knowledge essays
3380:Finding an essay
3345:
3332:
2994:Butterfly effect
2989:Boston Tea Party
2949:Assume stupidity
2934:Assume bad faith
2924:Articlecountitis
2882:
2869:
2801:Trivial mentions
2646:Minimum coverage
2489:
2476:
2175:Don't be ashamed
2054:Discussing cruft
2044:Deny recognition
1943:Nothing is clear
1752:Expect no thanks
1695:
1682:
1614:Nothing is clear
1461:deleting content
1144:Tertiary sources
899:Acronym overkill
771:The one question
636:
623:
616:
612:Knowledge essays
605:
598:
591:
582:
549:WP:EDITCONSENSUS
536:WP:EDITCONSENSUS
507:
501:
406:silent consensus
217:the change than
188:Lacks substance.
107:
106:
100:
90:
83:
44:
43:
37:
21:
3477:
3476:
3472:
3471:
3470:
3468:
3467:
3466:
3442:
3441:
3440:
3427:
3389:
3360:Value of essays
3339:
3318:
3149:Legal vandalism
3014:Counting juntas
2914:Anti-Wikipedian
2876:
2874:Humorous essays
2855:
2831:What to include
2776:Run-of-the-mill
2766:Read the source
2731:Offline sources
2526:Bare notability
2483:
2462:
2416:
2367:No Confederates
2165:Don't be a jerk
2123:
2089:Keep it concise
2029:Beyond civility
1987:
1821:
1762:How to be civil
1727:Don't retaliate
1689:
1668:
1599:Keep it concise
1534:Delete the junk
1529:Delete or merge
1519:Content removal
1453:
1419:Myth vs fiction
1380:
1271:Robotic editing
1134:Science sources
1129:Primary sources
1119:History sources
894:Abandoned stubs
875:
646:Article content
630:
617:
609:
572:
505:
499:
492:
476:
467:
461:
441:
424:
414:
371:
354:
347:
266:WP:STONEWALLING
226:WP:NOTUNANIMITY
185:
173:fix and improve
152:Knowledge space
104:
94:
93:
86:
79:
75:
67:
66:
41:
35:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3475:
3473:
3465:
3464:
3459:
3454:
3444:
3443:
3437:
3436:
3433:
3432:
3429:
3428:
3426:
3425:
3420:
3415:
3414:
3413:
3408:
3397:
3395:
3391:
3390:
3388:
3387:
3382:
3377:
3372:
3367:
3362:
3357:
3351:
3349:
3341:
3340:
3335:
3328:
3327:
3324:
3323:
3320:
3319:
3317:
3316:
3311:
3306:
3301:
3296:
3291:
3286:
3281:
3276:
3271:
3266:
3261:
3256:
3251:
3246:
3241:
3236:
3231:
3226:
3221:
3216:
3211:
3206:
3201:
3196:
3191:
3186:
3181:
3176:
3171:
3166:
3161:
3156:
3151:
3146:
3141:
3136:
3131:
3126:
3121:
3116:
3111:
3106:
3101:
3096:
3091:
3086:
3081:
3076:
3071:
3066:
3061:
3056:
3054:Editsummarisis
3051:
3046:
3041:
3036:
3031:
3026:
3021:
3016:
3011:
3009:Counting forks
3006:
3001:
2996:
2991:
2986:
2981:
2976:
2971:
2966:
2961:
2956:
2951:
2946:
2941:
2936:
2931:
2926:
2921:
2916:
2911:
2906:
2901:
2896:
2891:
2885:
2878:
2877:
2872:
2865:
2864:
2861:
2860:
2857:
2856:
2854:
2853:
2848:
2843:
2838:
2833:
2828:
2823:
2818:
2813:
2808:
2803:
2798:
2793:
2788:
2783:
2778:
2773:
2768:
2763:
2758:
2753:
2748:
2743:
2738:
2733:
2728:
2723:
2718:
2713:
2708:
2703:
2698:
2693:
2688:
2683:
2678:
2673:
2668:
2663:
2658:
2653:
2648:
2643:
2638:
2633:
2628:
2623:
2618:
2613:
2608:
2603:
2598:
2593:
2588:
2583:
2578:
2573:
2568:
2566:Don't cite GNG
2563:
2558:
2553:
2548:
2543:
2541:But it's true!
2538:
2533:
2528:
2523:
2518:
2513:
2508:
2503:
2498:
2492:
2485:
2484:
2479:
2472:
2471:
2468:
2467:
2464:
2463:
2461:
2460:
2455:
2450:
2445:
2440:
2438:WikiHarassment
2435:
2430:
2424:
2422:
2418:
2417:
2415:
2414:
2409:
2404:
2399:
2394:
2389:
2384:
2379:
2374:
2372:No queerphobia
2369:
2364:
2359:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2342:
2337:
2332:
2327:
2322:
2317:
2312:
2307:
2302:
2297:
2292:
2287:
2282:
2277:
2272:
2267:
2262:
2257:
2252:
2247:
2242:
2237:
2232:
2227:
2222:
2217:
2212:
2207:
2202:
2197:
2192:
2187:
2182:
2177:
2172:
2167:
2162:
2157:
2152:
2147:
2142:
2137:
2131:
2129:
2125:
2124:
2122:
2121:
2116:
2111:
2106:
2101:
2096:
2091:
2086:
2081:
2076:
2071:
2066:
2061:
2056:
2051:
2046:
2041:
2036:
2031:
2026:
2021:
2016:
2011:
2009:Assume no clue
2006:
2001:
1995:
1993:
1989:
1988:
1986:
1985:
1980:
1975:
1970:
1965:
1960:
1955:
1950:
1945:
1940:
1935:
1930:
1925:
1920:
1915:
1910:
1905:
1900:
1895:
1890:
1885:
1880:
1875:
1870:
1865:
1860:
1855:
1850:
1845:
1840:
1835:
1829:
1827:
1823:
1822:
1820:
1819:
1814:
1809:
1804:
1799:
1794:
1789:
1784:
1779:
1774:
1769:
1764:
1759:
1754:
1749:
1747:Enjoy yourself
1744:
1739:
1734:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1714:
1709:
1703:
1701:
1691:
1690:
1685:
1678:
1677:
1674:
1673:
1670:
1669:
1667:
1666:
1661:
1656:
1651:
1646:
1641:
1636:
1631:
1626:
1621:
1616:
1611:
1606:
1601:
1596:
1591:
1586:
1581:
1576:
1571:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1551:
1546:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1526:
1521:
1516:
1511:
1506:
1501:
1496:
1491:
1486:
1481:
1476:
1471:
1465:
1463:
1460:
1455:
1454:
1452:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1390:
1388:
1382:
1381:
1379:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1338:
1333:
1328:
1323:
1318:
1313:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1276:Sham consensus
1273:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1188:
1183:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1126:
1121:
1111:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1066:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1021:
1016:
1011:
1006:
1001:
996:
991:
986:
981:
976:
971:
966:
961:
956:
951:
946:
941:
936:
931:
926:
921:
916:
911:
906:
901:
896:
891:
885:
883:
877:
876:
874:
873:
868:
863:
858:
853:
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
823:
818:
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
788:
783:
778:
773:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
723:
721:Explanationism
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
688:
683:
678:
673:
668:
663:
658:
653:
648:
642:
640:
632:
631:
626:
619:
618:
610:
608:
607:
600:
593:
585:
579:
578:
571:
568:
513:does not reply
475:
472:
460:
457:
454:
449:(such as ) or
444:
440:
437:
413:
410:
382:
381:
370:
367:
353:
350:
346:
343:
211:WP:NOCONSENSUS
184:
181:
177:
176:
169:
162:
115:
114:
108:
96:
95:
92:
91:
84:
76:
71:
68:
56:
55:
47:
45:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3474:
3463:
3460:
3458:
3455:
3453:
3450:
3449:
3447:
3424:
3421:
3419:
3416:
3412:
3409:
3407:
3404:
3403:
3402:
3399:
3398:
3396:
3392:
3386:
3383:
3381:
3378:
3376:
3373:
3371:
3368:
3366:
3363:
3361:
3358:
3356:
3353:
3352:
3350:
3346:
3342:
3338:
3333:
3329:
3315:
3312:
3310:
3307:
3305:
3302:
3300:
3297:
3295:
3292:
3290:
3287:
3285:
3284:Watchlistitis
3282:
3280:
3279:The WikiBible
3277:
3275:
3272:
3270:
3267:
3265:
3262:
3260:
3257:
3255:
3252:
3250:
3247:
3245:
3242:
3240:
3237:
3235:
3232:
3230:
3227:
3225:
3224:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3222:
3220:
3217:
3215:
3212:
3210:
3207:
3205:
3202:
3200:
3199:Play the game
3197:
3195:
3192:
3190:
3187:
3185:
3182:
3180:
3177:
3175:
3172:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3162:
3160:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3150:
3147:
3145:
3142:
3140:
3139:My local pond
3137:
3135:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3120:
3117:
3115:
3112:
3110:
3107:
3105:
3102:
3100:
3097:
3095:
3092:
3090:
3087:
3085:
3082:
3080:
3077:
3075:
3072:
3070:
3067:
3065:
3062:
3060:
3057:
3055:
3052:
3050:
3049:Edits Per Day
3047:
3045:
3044:Editcountitis
3042:
3040:
3037:
3035:
3032:
3030:
3027:
3025:
3022:
3020:
3017:
3015:
3012:
3010:
3007:
3005:
3002:
3000:
2997:
2995:
2992:
2990:
2987:
2985:
2982:
2980:
2977:
2975:
2972:
2970:
2967:
2965:
2962:
2960:
2957:
2955:
2952:
2950:
2947:
2945:
2942:
2940:
2937:
2935:
2932:
2930:
2927:
2925:
2922:
2920:
2917:
2915:
2912:
2910:
2907:
2905:
2902:
2900:
2897:
2895:
2892:
2890:
2887:
2886:
2883:
2879:
2875:
2870:
2866:
2852:
2849:
2847:
2844:
2842:
2839:
2837:
2834:
2832:
2829:
2827:
2824:
2822:
2819:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2809:
2807:
2804:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2794:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2784:
2782:
2779:
2777:
2774:
2772:
2769:
2767:
2764:
2762:
2759:
2757:
2754:
2752:
2749:
2747:
2744:
2742:
2739:
2737:
2734:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2704:
2702:
2699:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2689:
2687:
2684:
2682:
2679:
2677:
2674:
2672:
2669:
2667:
2664:
2662:
2659:
2657:
2654:
2652:
2649:
2647:
2644:
2642:
2639:
2637:
2634:
2632:
2631:Insignificant
2629:
2627:
2624:
2622:
2619:
2617:
2614:
2612:
2609:
2607:
2604:
2602:
2599:
2597:
2594:
2592:
2589:
2587:
2584:
2582:
2579:
2577:
2574:
2572:
2569:
2567:
2564:
2562:
2559:
2557:
2554:
2552:
2549:
2547:
2544:
2542:
2539:
2537:
2534:
2532:
2529:
2527:
2524:
2522:
2519:
2517:
2514:
2512:
2509:
2507:
2504:
2502:
2499:
2497:
2494:
2493:
2490:
2486:
2482:
2477:
2473:
2459:
2456:
2454:
2451:
2449:
2448:WikiLawyering
2446:
2444:
2441:
2439:
2436:
2434:
2431:
2429:
2426:
2425:
2423:
2421:WikiRelations
2419:
2413:
2410:
2408:
2405:
2403:
2400:
2398:
2395:
2393:
2390:
2388:
2385:
2383:
2380:
2378:
2375:
2373:
2370:
2368:
2365:
2363:
2360:
2358:
2355:
2351:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2343:
2341:
2338:
2336:
2333:
2331:
2328:
2326:
2323:
2321:
2318:
2316:
2313:
2311:
2308:
2306:
2303:
2301:
2298:
2296:
2293:
2291:
2288:
2286:
2283:
2281:
2278:
2276:
2273:
2271:
2268:
2266:
2263:
2261:
2258:
2256:
2253:
2251:
2248:
2246:
2245:Don't cry COI
2243:
2241:
2238:
2236:
2233:
2231:
2228:
2226:
2223:
2221:
2218:
2216:
2213:
2211:
2208:
2206:
2205:Don't be rude
2203:
2201:
2198:
2196:
2193:
2191:
2188:
2186:
2183:
2181:
2178:
2176:
2173:
2171:
2168:
2166:
2163:
2161:
2158:
2156:
2153:
2151:
2150:Cyberbullying
2148:
2146:
2143:
2141:
2138:
2136:
2133:
2132:
2130:
2126:
2120:
2117:
2115:
2112:
2110:
2107:
2105:
2102:
2100:
2097:
2095:
2092:
2090:
2087:
2085:
2082:
2080:
2077:
2075:
2072:
2070:
2067:
2065:
2062:
2060:
2057:
2055:
2052:
2050:
2047:
2045:
2042:
2040:
2037:
2035:
2032:
2030:
2027:
2025:
2022:
2020:
2017:
2015:
2012:
2010:
2007:
2005:
2002:
2000:
1997:
1996:
1994:
1990:
1984:
1981:
1979:
1976:
1974:
1971:
1969:
1966:
1964:
1961:
1959:
1956:
1954:
1951:
1949:
1946:
1944:
1941:
1939:
1936:
1934:
1931:
1929:
1928:The last word
1926:
1924:
1923:The grey zone
1921:
1919:
1916:
1914:
1911:
1909:
1906:
1904:
1901:
1899:
1896:
1894:
1891:
1889:
1886:
1884:
1881:
1879:
1876:
1874:
1871:
1869:
1866:
1864:
1861:
1859:
1856:
1854:
1851:
1849:
1846:
1844:
1841:
1839:
1836:
1834:
1831:
1830:
1828:
1824:
1818:
1815:
1813:
1810:
1808:
1805:
1803:
1800:
1798:
1795:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1785:
1783:
1780:
1778:
1775:
1773:
1770:
1768:
1765:
1763:
1760:
1758:
1755:
1753:
1750:
1748:
1745:
1743:
1740:
1738:
1735:
1733:
1730:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1708:
1705:
1704:
1702:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1683:
1679:
1665:
1662:
1660:
1657:
1655:
1652:
1650:
1647:
1645:
1642:
1640:
1637:
1635:
1632:
1630:
1627:
1625:
1622:
1620:
1617:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1605:
1602:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1592:
1590:
1587:
1585:
1582:
1580:
1577:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1540:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1527:
1525:
1522:
1520:
1517:
1515:
1512:
1510:
1507:
1505:
1502:
1500:
1497:
1495:
1492:
1490:
1487:
1485:
1482:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1466:
1464:
1462:
1456:
1450:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1391:
1389:
1387:
1383:
1377:
1374:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1364:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1344:
1342:
1341:Walled garden
1339:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1319:
1317:
1314:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1304:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1272:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1184:
1182:
1179:
1177:
1174:
1172:
1169:
1167:
1166:Mine a source
1164:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1107:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1014:Concept cloud
1012:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1002:
1000:
997:
995:
992:
990:
987:
985:
984:Cherrypicking
982:
980:
977:
975:
972:
970:
967:
965:
962:
960:
957:
955:
952:
950:
947:
945:
942:
940:
937:
935:
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
920:
917:
915:
912:
910:
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
890:
887:
886:
884:
882:
878:
872:
869:
867:
864:
862:
859:
857:
854:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
827:
824:
822:
819:
817:
816:Systemic bias
814:
812:
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
644:
643:
641:
637:
633:
629:
624:
620:
613:
606:
601:
599:
594:
592:
587:
586:
583:
577:
574:
573:
569:
567:
565:
561:
557:
552:
550:
546:
541:
537:
533:
528:
526:
521:
518:
514:
509:
504:
496:
491:
487:
483:
478:
473:
471:
466:
458:
456:
452:
448:
438:
436:
434:
429:
423:
419:
411:
409:
407:
401:
399:
395:
391:
387:
379:
376:
375:See generally
373:
372:
366:
362:
360:
351:
349:
344:
342:
340:
336:
334:
330:
326:
324:
318:
316:
312:
309:
305:
301:
297:
291:
287:
283:
281:
278:
273:
269:
267:
264:
260:
257:
253:
249:
244:
242:
238:
234:
229:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
205:
201:
200:
195:
191:
189:
182:
180:
174:
170:
167:
163:
160:
159:
158:
155:
153:
149:
145:
141:
140:discuss first
137:
135:
130:
121:
112:
109:
102:
101:
89:
85:
82:
78:
77:
74:
69:
64:
60:
54:
52:
46:
39:
38:
30:
29:WP:DRN Rule C
19:
3348:About essays
3337:About essays
3244:Rouge editor
3194:Oops Defense
2974:Barnstaritis
2939:Assume faith
2761:Pokémon test
2606:High Schools
2428:WikiBullying
2392:Superhatting
2387:POV railroad
2084:Just drop it
1888:Nobody cares
1722:Divisiveness
1246:Printability
1139:Style guides
929:Amnesia test
786:Paraphrasing
562:, including
555:
553:
531:
529:
524:
522:
512:
510:
494:
493:
477:
468:
442:
425:
412:Fix the edit
402:
398:WikiProjects
394:noticeboards
383:
374:
369:Don't revert
363:
355:
348:
338:
337:
320:
319:
307:
295:
294:
276:
271:
270:
262:
255:
245:
230:
222:
218:
214:
207:
198:
197:
193:
192:
187:
186:
178:
156:
144:take to talk
143:
139:
134:edit summary
132:
126:
110:
48:
3355:Essay guide
3239:Rouge admin
2806:Video links
2661:No big loss
2350:just madmen
2300:Don't shout
2074:How to lose
2069:Get over it
1853:Be the glue
1772:Negotiation
1629:Relist bias
1459:Removing or
1291:Stub Makers
1124:Law sources
1054:Don't panic
451:quality tag
311:WP:Civility
49:This is an
3446:Categories
3411:Guidelines
3179:No, really
3159:LTTAUTMAOK
2641:Make stubs
2362:No racists
2104:Say "MOBY"
1826:Philosophy
1699:The basics
1256:Publicists
1226:Presentism
1171:Merge Test
1156:Inaccuracy
639:Philosophy
480:See also:
463:See also:
416:See also:
233:WP:EDITCON
194:Incorrect.
2889:Adminitis
2458:WikiPeace
2433:WikiCrime
2412:UPPERCASE
1792:Thank you
1424:Proseline
1216:Permastub
781:Paradoxes
696:Don't lie
545:WP:PGBOLD
540:WP:EPTALK
495:Step one:
465:WP:REVEXP
308:See also:
129:reverting
73:Shortcuts
3406:Policies
2556:Coatrack
2453:WikiLove
2443:WikiHate
2357:No Nazis
2330:Griefing
1594:Immunity
846:Trifecta
676:Cohesion
570:See also
564:WP:THIRD
277:See also
223:See also
154:policy.
131:with an
88:WP:DNRNC
3069:Emerson
2909:ANI flu
1873:Failure
1712:Apology
1609:Nothing
806:Purpose
547:" for "
259:WP:ONUS
256:But see
215:against
148:general
81:WP:DRNC
2551:Clones
2128:Don'ts
2049:Desist
2039:Candor
1948:Reader
488:, and
127:Avoid
1802:Truce
428:civil
199:after
51:essay
3074:Fart
3019:Crap
1404:Coup
756:Need
503:ping
420:and
396:and
313:and
300:owns
142:", "
1992:Dos
615:(?)
554:If
551:".
538:or
263:See
243:.
219:for
208:See
150:or
138:, "
3448::
566:.
506:}}
500:{{
484:,
435:.
400:.
317:.
282:.
268:.
228:.
202:a
604:e
597:t
590:v
543:"
380:.
325:.
53:.
31:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
