72:
225:
237:
249:
213:
134:
Although the
Editing team expects this software to be useful and available to everyone, they are centering the challenging experiences of editors from sub-Saharan Africa, which is a growing and underrepresented group in the Wikimedia movement. Altogether, 80% of editors in sub-Saharan Africa
147:
The
Editing Team thinks it is crucial that experienced volunteers be empowered to configure when, and for whom, Edit Check becomes activated. This way, they can be confident the software is promoting behavior they deem to be productive and modify the software when it is not.
135:
contribute to the French and
English Wikipedias. Many African contributors are newer editors, and a high proportion of them edit from smartphones. They also face structural barriers that the Editing team will not be able to address directly, such as being
110:
The first version is expected to have a low false-positive rate (i.e., if it suggests a citation, you probably should to add one) and a high false-negative rate (i.e., it won't suggest any improvements to edits that would benefit from adding a
126:
Ideally, improving compliance with content policies (e.g., by encouraging the addition of inline citations) will reduce disappointment among inexperienced editors and reduce the workload for experienced editors who patrol
123:
The goal for this project is to lead people from Sub-Saharan Africa who are new to contributing to
Knowledge (XXG) to publish changes they are proud of and that experienced volunteers consider useful.
236:
224:
212:
96:
If you add a new paragraph without an inline citation, the first version will ask you to choose whether to add a citation before publishing your changes (
159:
systems afford volunteers the ability to audit and configure how they function on-wiki, Edit Check will enable volunteers, on a per project basis to:
248:
301:
136:
275:
This strategy amounts to the initial reference Edit Check becoming activated if/when all of the following conditions are met:
44:
156:
114:
As of March 2023, the new tool is still being designed. There are no prototypes or testing sites available yet.
152:
321:
128:
264:
To start, the
Editing Team is pursuing an approach with Edit Check that minimizes the likelihood of
86:
272:, on a per-project basis, to configure and evolve the heuristic to become more robust over time.
71:
55:
75:
The first version of the mobile Edit Check experience will prompt people to add a reference.
288:
265:
101:
48:
25:
305:
199:
visual editor's publishing workflow that people will see if/when they add new content
315:
269:
184:
97:
90:
40:
279:
A minimum of one new paragraph of text is added to the article someone is editing
287:
You can learn amore about the assumptions that informed the thinking above in
35:
282:
The "new paragraph(s) of text" someone has added does NOT include a reference
43:. The first visible result will be a prompt to encourage editors to add an
20:
170:
the logic that determines when the reference Edit Check becomes activated
195:
The first version of Edit Check will introduce a new step within the
131:, while improving the overall quality of Knowledge (XXG)'s contents.
54:
To start, Edit check will only be made available to people using the
70:
151:
In line with the above, and drawing inspiration from how the
242:
Invite people to share why they didn't add a reference
179:
the edits people who are shown Edit Check are making
230:Positive feedback if they elect to add a reference
218:Prompt people to decide whether to add a reference
47:before publishing new information to an article.
39:is a 2023 project by the Wikimedia Foundation's
137:disproportionately affected by IP range blocks
8:
51:(e.g., adding links) may be explored later.
308:this page to learn about upcoming meetings
183:Work to implement the above is ongoing in
85:The first version will appear only in the
207:First version – mobile site (March 2023)
16:Planned Knowledge (XXG) software feature
302:mw:Editing team/Community Conversations
205:
58:on either the mobile or desktop site.
7:
157:Growth Team Community configuration
14:
80:What will happen (first version):
247:
235:
223:
211:
1:
270:planning ways for volunteers
93:for the desktop experience.)
338:
18:
76:
296:Community discussions
129:Special:RecentChanges
74:
254:Overview of workflow
102:phab:T329988#8654867
87:mobile visual editor
49:Additional behaviors
268:. The team is also
260:Reference detection
77:
329:
251:
239:
227:
215:
30:
28:
337:
336:
332:
331:
330:
328:
327:
326:
312:
311:
298:
289:T329988#8654867
266:false positives
262:
255:
252:
243:
240:
231:
228:
219:
216:
193:
145:
143:Configurability
121:
69:
64:
45:inline citation
32:
26:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
335:
333:
325:
324:
314:
313:
310:
309:
297:
294:
284:
283:
280:
261:
258:
257:
256:
253:
246:
244:
241:
234:
232:
229:
222:
220:
217:
210:
208:
192:
189:
181:
180:
174:
144:
141:
120:
117:
116:
115:
112:
108:
94:
68:
65:
63:
60:
31:
23:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
334:
323:
320:
319:
317:
307:
303:
300:
299:
295:
293:
292:
290:
281:
278:
277:
276:
273:
271:
267:
259:
250:
245:
238:
233:
226:
221:
214:
209:
206:
204:
202:
198:
190:
188:
186:
178:
175:
173:
169:
165:
162:
161:
160:
158:
154:
149:
142:
140:
138:
132:
130:
124:
118:
113:
109:
107:
103:
99:
95:
92:
88:
84:
83:
82:
81:
73:
66:
61:
59:
57:
56:visual editor
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:
36:mw:Edit check
29:
22:
322:VisualEditor
286:
285:
274:
263:
203:a reference.
200:
196:
194:
182:
176:
171:
167:
163:
150:
146:
133:
125:
122:
105:
98:phab:T324730
91:phab:T329579
79:
78:
53:
41:Editing team
34:
33:
27:Task T265163
153:Edit filter
89:. (Follow
21:Phabricator
19:Tracked in
111:citation).
67:March 2023
316:Category
119:Approach
201:without
185:T327959
197:mobile
191:Design
177:Review
62:Status
306:watch
164:Audit
168:edit
166:and
155:and
100:and
172:and
318::
304:–
187:.
139:.
291:.
106:.
104:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
