Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured and good topic candidates/C and D class destroyers/archive1 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

66: 252: 239: 226: 213: 200: 183: 170: 157: 144: 127: 114: 101: 88: 75: 51: 283:
for each class and are listed first, the rest are alphabetical. All of the C-class ships were sold to Canada in the late 1930s as they were only a half-strength flotilla and did not work well as a tactical unit in the British system. A number of the ships survived World War II, but the survivors were
40: 284:
scrapped after the end of the war. The British retained the D-class and most were sunk during the war, including one by a collision with a British battleship. The worn-out survivors were also scrapped after war's end.
44: 302:
Books are exceedingly fragile. As far as I know, you can't use the special template, you have to use the traditional method or when a request to convert to PDF et. al. is made, the request will just break.
287:
Before I built the book for this topic, is there a problem using the template for ship names, forex {{HMS|Kempenfelt|I18|6}}, rather than the more traditional, if lengthier, style of link?--
336:
The GAN page has been clogged lately with these babies, happy to see them promoted. I'd suggest taking the class to FA after the unified GT gets promoted, but that's your choice.
17: 389:
Dunno, but the class articles for C and D, E and F, G and H are combined which is generally OK as there were very few changes in the designs between them.--
434: 420: 398: 380: 363: 345: 327: 296: 23: 371:
But why are the C and D Class combined and not two separate topics? Makes me wonder why the A and B Class are not included.
271:
finally got promoted a few hours ago so I present these two classes of British destroyers built in the early 1930s.
394: 318: 292: 54: 376: 429: 417: 78: 359: 341: 104: 390: 304: 288: 203: 117: 65: 255: 229: 216: 372: 280: 173: 160: 147: 130: 412: 242: 186: 91: 355: 337: 24:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured topic candidates/C and D class destroyers/archive1
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured and good topic candidates 8: 354:- Excellent work on these articles, Sturm. 7: 251: 238: 225: 212: 199: 182: 169: 156: 143: 126: 113: 100: 87: 74: 50: 31: 426:Closed with consensus to promote. 410:Very comprehensive and complete. 250: 237: 224: 211: 198: 181: 168: 155: 142: 125: 112: 99: 86: 73: 64: 49: 1: 435:22:00, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 421:23:38, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 399:13:29, 10 November 2011 (UTC) 381:08:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC) 364:11:50, 5 November 2011 (UTC) 346:01:15, 5 November 2011 (UTC) 328:16:09, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 297:14:26, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 451: 55:C and D class destroyers 34:C and D class destroyers 325: 22:(Redirected from 442: 432: 419: 415: 324: 319: 316: 281:flotilla leaders 254: 253: 241: 240: 228: 227: 215: 214: 202: 201: 185: 184: 172: 171: 159: 158: 146: 145: 129: 128: 116: 115: 103: 102: 90: 89: 77: 76: 68: 53: 52: 27: 450: 449: 445: 444: 443: 441: 440: 439: 430: 413: 411: 320: 313: 309: 305: 265: 264: 263: 194: 138: 69: 61: 60: 57: 47: 36: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 448: 446: 438: 437: 423: 404: 403: 402: 401: 384: 383: 366: 331: 330: 311: 307: 262: 261: 248: 235: 222: 209: 195: 193: 192: 179: 166: 153: 139: 137: 136: 123: 110: 97: 84: 70: 63: 62: 58: 48: 39: 38: 37: 35: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 447: 436: 433: 427: 424: 422: 418: 416: 409: 406: 405: 400: 396: 392: 391:Sturmvogel 66 388: 387: 386: 385: 382: 378: 374: 370: 367: 365: 361: 357: 353: 350: 349: 348: 347: 343: 339: 335: 329: 326: 323: 317: 315: 301: 300: 299: 298: 294: 290: 289:Sturmvogel 66 285: 282: 278: 274: 270: 260: 259: 249: 247: 246: 236: 234: 233: 223: 221: 220: 210: 208: 207: 197: 196: 191: 190: 180: 178: 177: 167: 165: 164: 154: 152: 151: 141: 140: 135: 134: 124: 122: 121: 111: 109: 108: 98: 96: 95: 85: 83: 82: 72: 71: 67: 56: 46: 42: 33: 25: 19: 425: 407: 368: 351: 333: 332: 321: 306: 286: 276: 272: 268: 266: 257: 244: 231: 218: 205: 188: 175: 162: 149: 132: 119: 106: 93: 80: 373:Jim Sweeney 59:15 articles 431:GamerPro64 414:Glimmer721 273:Kempenfelt 81:Kempenfelt 356:Parsecboy 338:Buggie111 279:were the 206:Defender 120:Crusader 107:Crescent 408:Support 369:Support 352:Support 334:Support 314:anguard 258:Duchess 232:Diamond 219:Delight 45:discuss 277:Duncan 269:Duncan 176:Daring 163:Dainty 150:Duncan 133:Cygnet 245:Diana 189:Decoy 94:Comet 16:< 395:talk 377:talk 360:talk 342:talk 322:Wha? 310:ven 293:talk 275:and 267:HMS 256:HMS 243:HMS 230:HMS 217:HMS 204:HMS 187:HMS 174:HMS 161:HMS 148:HMS 131:HMS 118:HMS 105:HMS 92:HMS 79:HMS 41:edit 428:- 397:) 379:) 362:) 344:) 295:) 43:| 393:( 375:( 358:( 340:( 312:M 308:S 291:( 26:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured and good topic candidates
Knowledge (XXG):Featured topic candidates/C and D class destroyers/archive1
edit
discuss
C and D class destroyers

HMS Kempenfelt
HMS Comet
HMS Crescent
HMS Crusader
HMS Cygnet
HMS Duncan
HMS Dainty
HMS Daring
HMS Decoy
HMS Defender
HMS Delight
HMS Diamond
HMS Diana
HMS Duchess
flotilla leaders
Sturmvogel 66
talk
14:26, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Sven Manguard
Wha?
16:09, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Buggie111
talk
01:15, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.