37:
This article seems to be well writen in my opinion, it's not biased, and it has some nice external links for additional information. It follows the Manual of Style, and is accurate IMO.
109:. Many external links are given, and the article is somewhat thorough, but offline references need to be cited to inform readers where the author(s) got the information from. —
21:
44:
17:
142:
130:
118:
87:
75:
58:
41:
54:, it's a well structured summary article, but it has no references, also some more images would be nice--
114:
38:
100:
66:. No references. Otherwise, the article seems fine, though. No need for additional images, IMHO.
127:
126:. One word: comprehensive. Also rare to see such good articles with open-ends on Knowledge.
110:
84:
71:
55:
139:
96:
31:
95:
This is very much a summary article, and I don't think it's quite FA status. --
67:
83:- Referance the article and i'll support it. --
8:
138:. Unless inline reference is done. --
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
28:
1:
47:04:59, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
159:
103:23:52, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
143:18:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
131:09:25, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
119:17:13, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
88:14:06, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
76:11:54, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
59:05:06, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
81:Conditional Support
140:Jerry Crimson Mann
150:
74:
158:
157:
153:
152:
151:
149:
148:
147:
70:
39:Exir Kamalabadi
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
156:
154:
146:
145:
133:
121:
104:
90:
78:
61:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
155:
144:
141:
137:
134:
132:
129:
125:
122:
120:
116:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
94:
91:
89:
86:
82:
79:
77:
73:
69:
65:
62:
60:
57:
53:
50:
49:
48:
46:
43:
40:
33:
30:
23:
19:
135:
123:
106:
92:
80:
63:
51:
36:
32:Cryptography
22:Cryptography
136:Mild object
111:Stevey7788
85:ZeWrestler
45:(contribs)
128:Deryck C.
97:JB Adder
20: |
124:Support
107:Object
93:Object
64:Object
52:Object
42:(Talk)
56:nixie
16:<
115:talk
101:Talk
68:Phil
117:)
99:|
113:(
72:s
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.