3310:. In the Knowledge list, it is "16. December 25–27, 1969; 5.19; 3; Major", but in the current website listing it is "9. 25-28 December 1969; 6.29; 4; Crippling". I was going to suggest that you give the NESIS value/ranking, along with the numbers from the formula used to calculate it, but that may not be wise if this is dynamically updated. Maybe give the current figures "as of 2011" and say in the reference "the latest NESIS value and category for this storm can be viewed at ... which is dynamically updated as the latest figures are published/obtained/modified based on the most recent research"? If indeed that is what is going on here. You could also say that the NESIS value is a measure of area and population affected, which leads me to ask whether it is possible to dig a bit deeper and quote figures for area and population affected by this storm? It just struck me as a bit strange that this is a storm that has been assessed for the NESIS scale, but you don't mention NESIS at all, except in "see also". If there is a reason for this, fair enough, but I think it is a question that needs asking.
1909:- I found some of the explanation there very helpful. I know you currently link that featured article already, but some readers will be more used to having a key explaining image symbols attached to the image, rather than having to go and read a Knowledge article. There is, of course, the larger question of whether you are including these images for the reader to examine in detail and attempt to understand them, or whether they are decorative images intended to give readers only a superficial idea of what is shown (the low resolution of the images makes it difficult to examine them in any detail or read the numbers written on them, so they appear to be more decorative than something to be followed up by the curious reader).
3449:
time in a particular topic area, it can be easy for them to become so familiar with the basic concepts in that area, that they over-estimate what the lay-knowledge of an area is among the general public, and are happy to just link off to other articles instead. I know you aren't particularly receptive to that point of criticism, but if you could consider it and see how other articles are written, that might help you see what level I'm suggesting you pitch the article at. I should actually ask you which level you are pitching the article at? One level below professional meteorologist (e.g. postgrad), or one level above high-school graduate (e.g. university student), or somewhere in-between?
1191:, and that in turn is only linked from a series of nor'easter storms which may (I haven't checked) only be linked among themselves or to the list. I know healthy linking to and from other articles is not a FAC requirement, but it astounded me that this article was only linked from a list. I would normally suggest that links be added in relevant places, but given the lack of existing links, I'm not entirely sure if that is a good idea. At least some linking should be a natural demand for an article, not a web of links created by the writers of an article or set of articles. Will wait to see what others say about this (if anything).
2453:- I thought the storm was moving north-eastwards? I was also confused by "just east of Long Island" - does this mean the centre of the storm has now moved out over the coast and is over the sea? You then say it "it approached the Massachusetts coast", which from looking at a map is north-east of Long Island (with Connecticut around there as well). Now, if snowfall is propagating around the western end of the cyclone and reaching as far south as Long Island, that is going backwards to where the storm has just come from, so I am still confused here. Can you make the description any clearer?
2321:"The low-level jet intensified to an extremely high 55 m/s (120 mph) as it began to wrap around the low from the south, enhancing moisture and warm air under areas of heavy precipitation." - I had forgotten about that low-level jet. What has it been doing since we last read about it drifting eastward over the southern US states? (This is a serious question, actually, as I had thought the jet had developed into the storm, yet here I find it mentioned again, wrapping itself around the low - it really would help to make clearer the high-level and low-level stuff, with diagrams).
2449:"While located just east of Long Island, the nor'easter began its second phase of rapid strengthening and attained its peak severity as it approached the Massachusetts coast. snowfall propagated around the western end of the cyclone, reaching as far south as Long Island." - I'm afraid I got lost again here. I had to go look things up on a map with names of states on it, as the maps in the article don't have the names of the states on them, and so were of little use to me. What really confused me was the snow propagating round the western end and reaching
1234:
themselves that it might have been 2-3 days or something like that. The snowfall map lower down the article gives a range of 4 days. Is it not possible at all to say how long the snowfall lasted in some of the areas affected (e.g. where the snowfall was heaviest)? The latest date in the article is the 30th, but the article ends somewhat abruptly at that point, with no real closure. Do meterological records indicate when snowfall has melted completely on an area? There must be some system for measuring that.
3160:"Trends and changes occurred in the major weather oscillation systems both west and east of the United States in the period before and during the December 1969 nor'easter. To the west, the effects of the continuing long-term El Niño had been felt the previous winter (1968-1969), which had produced two significant storms in the Northeast United States, both also included in the NESIS scale. These previous storms were the storm of 8-10 February 1969 and the
2239:
nor'easter is considered "mature" when its associated 500-mb trough takes on a negative tilt, which allows the surface low to deepen and ride the coast northward. The forward movement of the surface low and the directional orientation of the 500-mb trough are not directly related, however. Also, the trough is a different weather feature from the coastal front, which is a dividing line between two masses of air of different densities or temperatures.
2005:- my US geography is hopeless. I eventually managed to work out (by clicking through to the image page) that this is showing the Gulf of Mexico coast of the southern US states, but it would help if the image caption in the article said that. The description page itself should give a scale or at least identify the extreme points at left and right and at top. And what the symbols and lines mean. Otherwise it is just squiggles on paper for most people.
3391:
in-article explanation would be better. There has to be a balance, but currently I think the balance goes too far towards linking terms and some readers may spend more time clicking and reading other articles than reading this one. For example, I can tell from reading the article that this is not a hurricane, but is an "intense winter storm", but I'm trying to mentally place it with the other weather terms I know, such as '
3051:"Both the December 1969 nor'easter and two severe storms from the previous year, are considered part of the long-term El Niño trend that brought increasingly severe winter weather to the Northeast United States. During the general time frame of the December 1969 nor'easter, North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) values ranged from neutral to negative, trending more consistently negative in the days surrounding its genesis."
3192:
explicit connection between these two patterns and the storm, but, as with every listing in the book, they provide the info for background context that can be used by researchers looking for potential correlations. I've split the first paragraph into its own background section to perhaps clarify that it's meant more as a bit of climatological context than a direct aspect of the storm's genesis. What do you think?
3367:
missed out! About dynamically updating sources, would you consider raising this at a relevant WikiProject or other location for discussion? Overall, I'm going to strike this objection, but is there a reason you don't quote the NESIS values, seeing as they are from a formula that relate population affected and area affected - and are those figures (area and population) available to cite?
174:
over snow removal equipment. I created this article in the first couple weeks of the year, and gave it a couple months to be polished and reviewed. My reason for nominating it is that I feel it is among the highest-quality accounts of a meteorological event, aside, of course, from tropical cyclones. The meteorological synopsis is extremely thorough, owing to the excellent research of
750:"The nor'easter originated in a weak area of surface low pressure that formed over northern Texas by Christmas Day" - just gotta check, is there a better estimate than "by Christmas Day"? Also, a really minor quibble, but not all countries consider Christmas on December 25, and there doesn't seem to be any religious connotation to the article. Might just "December 25" work better?
3157:")? I accept your point about the blizzard template (I had misunderstood the difference between a blizzard and a snowstorm). Maybe a template on nor'easters (though I actually much prefer categories to templates)? I'm still not convinced that the bare citation to the list alone is enough here. I would suggest something like:
3390:
One point that I am bringing out here in a new bullet point is that the general feel I get as a reader who has a basic (secondary/high school-level) knowledge of meteorology, is that the basic meteorology is not explained enough within the article. There is too much linking out to other articles when
1721:
In the main body of the article, you say "The low turned northeast by early on
December 26 as a result of the coastal front along the East Coast, at which time the storm underwent its first of two periods of rapid intensification accelerated from Georgia to the coast of New Jersey". In the lead, you
3366:
Ah, I see now. I apologise for incorrectly stating above that you hadn't mentioned this is a NESIS storm. I had made the error of searching for "NESIS" (the initialism) rather than the full name, and not looking closely enough in the article. I should have realised it was unlikely that this had been
3191:
Snowfall Impact Scale", but the brunt of the
December 1969 hit Albany, while the Lindsay Storm was worst in NYC. A 75 mile/120km difference. I fear that geographically generalizing the ENSO and NAO as "west" and "east" of the US, respectively, is oversimplification. Kocin and Uccellini don't make an
2523:
Yes, that is obvious from the discussion here, but I'm saying it is not obvious to the reader of the article who has not read this discussion. There is no picture of swirling cyclonic clouds like there are in hurricane articles to give the reader a clue that circular motion is taking place here. You
2070:
For some of the images, you link directly to the image file as the source. The source link should actually be to the page on which the image is provided, as that page will (should) give details of the image. Ideally provide both, but the important one for verification and information purposes is the
1660:
What I'm trying to do is picture in my mind the developing storm moving over the "southern Gulf Coast states", and then fitting that in with the "localized southerly low-level jet developed by midday over
Mississippi and Alabama". Is this part of the development of the storm (i.e. you are going into
1810:
When you say "from
Georgia to the coast of New Jersey", I think to myself that it must have been moving from inland Georgia to coastal New Jersey, but did it reach the East Coast or not, or turn before it reached the coast and moved parallel to the coast and moving closer as it went northwards? The
1554:
You mention "jet" twice in the article. If someone is unfamiliar with what a jet is, they are left in the dark as to what role a "jet" plays in this storm. Think of it from the point of view of someone who has only ever heard of a jet aeroplane. Also, the link is not that helpful. It takes you to a
3467:
Yeah, I appreciate I'm often oblivious to overly technical terminology in my writings, so I really appreciate that you've stuck with the FAC all along to help me compensate for it. It's a bit overwhelming when I'm pointed to the potential for confusion, and I'm often not sure how to address it. In
3168:
The changes are to set the weather oscillation systems in geographical context (west and east) and explicitly name the two previous storms mentioned indirectly in the text, and to link to the one we have an article on. Is there a reason why this would not be desirable? I see above that you said to
3130:
Re the
Lindsay Storm, the December nor'easter and the early February nor'easter affected two different areas, so they're apples and oranges so to speak. Also, it is unknown and unlikely that the December storm met the criteria for a blizzard, so I can't see adding it to the template (or adding the
2671:
The article does seem to be silent on whether the storm had any effects at sea. If this is a storm rotating about a central point, and that point is on the coast, and the western edge is far inland, presumably this storm was creating havoc at sea on its eastern edge? You do imply at one point that
2238:
pressures (a "trough"). This region directly correlates with the low at the surface. These troughs can either have a positive tilt (southwest to northeast), a neutral tilt (due north to due south), or a negative tilt (northwest to southeast). It's like the coordinate plane in mathematical terms. A
2134:
I've struck the objection, but there is a deeper systemic problem here, in that the main meteorology sources seem to be geared to dynamic updates rather than historical records (compare their approach to that of an organisation like the
Library of Congress or the New York Public Library). This may
1854:
contained a track for the storm. The caption only said "Surface weather analysis of the nor'easter", so I mentally dismissed it as some complex diagram and thought to myself "what is really needed is a line showing the route the storm took". But now I look closer, I see that there is a dotted line
173:
For my first FAC in eight months, I present one of my proudest articles, which describes a highly significant, yet mostly forgotten, winter storm event. Drifts of snow following the storm were 30 feet high, which completely cut off some communities from the rest of the world, and proved victorious
3448:
Now that nor'easter is linked, I am happy (though see summary of unresolved bits below), but I do think you need to not characterize minor in-text explanatory prose (which can be worked in so as not to disrupt the flow of an article) as spoon-feeding people. When
Knowledge editors work for a long
3240:
Another point that struck me is that the size of this storm (geographically) is still unclear. How far outwards from the "centre" did the effects of the storm reach? If possible, this should be described in terms of absolute size (in kilometres) rather than just giving points of US geography that
2555:
linked in the article, I think even if readers didn't know storms rotated cyclonically, they can work it out. Again, I like to assume some reader competence, as otherwise it becomes a jumble of parenthetical and off-topic tangents in order to spoonfeed one or two people who might not have a basic
2360:
Maybe an obvious question here, but is this low-level jet different to the winds experienced at the surface, or is it the same. i.e. the wind speeds you may see quoted with respect to this storm, are they the same as this 55 m/s you quote? I ask this because in the article you say "strong winds",
1722:
say "Upon reaching the U.S. East Coast, it intensified and turned northeastward, accelerating toward New
England". Did it intensify before turning north-east, or did it turn north-east and then intensify, or both at the same time? The lead and main text seem to be saying slightly different things.
1340:
I'm actually not sure the convert template can handled it being spelled out, and I think you'd be hardpressed to find inHg being referred to in writings as "inches of mercury". There's a lot people reading print editions can't do, so I think we shouldn't bend over too far backwards to accommodate
2229:
Let me try to explain it for you: broadly speaking, meteorology occurs vertically; different things are happening the further up you go into the sky. At the surface, we have a closed-off (meaning it has a defined center of low pressure) low pressure system. In this case, the low extended several
3265:
I have no idea, honestly. I could make a guess, but of course that would be OR. I'd also be very hardpressed to find extreme points, since data over the open
Atlantic is minimal to non-existent, and the storm's effects likely extended beyond the US/Canada border where most documentation ends. A
3210:
That looks good. I do think it would help the reader to be eased gently into the background bit, with a mention of large-scale oscillations before you mention ENSO and NAO, and I do still worry that you need to make clearer that you are citing background context provided by Kocin and
Uccellini,
2574:
Fair enough, and as I said below, the linking of nor'easter greatly improves things. I won't press the point here, but I do think you should (after this FAC is over) take time to consider whether people really know as much about the atmosphere as you think they do. I don't think storms rotating
2627:
The word "inland" appears once in the article and the word "interior" twice - those not familiar with US geography will only have those clues to go on. The word "coast" appears ten times. The track in the diagram shows the storm moving along the coast. Can you not phrase it something like "its
1233:
Lead (and overall): I would expect to see something in the lead saying how long the storm lasted for, and how long the recovery took. You do say "late December 1969" and that it started on 25th, and that the worse of the storm took place on 26th and 27th, but the reader is left to work out for
2093:
For any image, you can have two links: (1) The link to the image itself that you use to download the image; (2) A documentation page that tells you what the image is showing, who made it (i.e. showing that it is freely licensed) and so on. For any image you need at least the latter and if not
2575:
cyclonically is something that most people are aware of. Most people know that hurricanes rotate, but most people think of storms as just clouds forming and producing thunder and lightning. Certainly stuff like low-level jets (a point that remains unaddressed) is not common knowledge at all.
3169:
Hurricanehink that "The effects of NAO are still being debated in meteorology circles" - this makes me worry that you are adding something here that is not completely certain. Do Kocin and Uccellini specifically make the ENSO and NAO connection? Could you not directly quote what they say?
3645:
Thank you for the support and extensive help. I'll keep your points in mind for future reference, with both this article and any others I write. Once I have a bit more time, I'll definitely look into initiating project-wide discussions about article complexity the the dynamic sources.
2692:
1242:
I added a definite time frame to the first sentence. Honestly, I don't think it would be possible to determine when the snow from this particular storm melted. I imagine some of it stayed around until March, when warmer weather inevitably takes over, but even then we have to assume
3031:
Thanks for the very detailed review. Yeah, pictures are kinda hard to come by for an old and somewhat obscure weather event, but I think the maps do a good job of illustrating it. I could ask around to see if I can get any satellite imagery from the ATS-3 sat. archives. Regards,
3094:
Is it possible that other readers will misunderstand this point, like it seems I have? If so, maybe try and rephrase to make clear what you are saying, or make clearer the connection between the source and what is said in the article. For example, you currently cite the phrase
1293:"Inches of mercury, (inHg) is a unit of measurement for pressure. It is still widely used for barometric pressure in weather reports and aviation in the United States, but is seldom used elsewhere." I was hoping for a conversion to mmHg, the measurement I am more familiar with.
1611:
And the other point I made, that the reader following the link is left to work out for themselves what you meant here? If your sources don't say, fair enough, but I was expecting some sort of response here. To my mind, this is effectively an undealt with disambiguation link.
3347:
To further clarify, see the footnote in the NESIS list: "In the event that information from these two sources is inconsistent, data from Kocin and Uccellini (2004) is used." In this specific article, however, I've chosen to include both ratings in the interest of fairness.
881:"The highest totals were found immediately inland from the coast." - IDK, it doesn't look that way in the map. The highest totals look fairly far inland, not to mention the lede says "although precipitation changed over to rain near the coast due to an influx of warmer air."
2277:
I'm honestly not sure how to explain it without going way off-topic or conducting original research (or bombarding the reference list with 15 sources that have nothing to do with the event). AFAIK there's not much to link to, so maybe that'll be a future project of mine.
2604:"heavy snowfall in Upstate New York and Vermont" - is this inland, on the left-hand edge of the storm? It would help if you could make clear at some point the width of the storm, so people don't just think it is moving up the coast, but is reaching far inland as well.
3280:
Fair enough. I accept your point that you can't say too much here. It might help to say that the grey areas show precipitation (this is something I hadn't realised, and I'm not sure readers should have to skim the surface weather analysis article to find this out).
607:"The winter of 1969–1970 continued a long-term El Niño from the previous winter, which produced two significant winter storms in the Northeast United States" - it might be hard to avoid, but could you find a way not to use "winter" three times in the same sentence?
438:
Thanks for the review! Really appreciate it. Re the Vermont comment, I think it's generally assumed that the governor corresponds to the last mentioned state, especially within the past two or three sentences. I'll fix it if you think it's that confusing, though.
834:
An infobox would be really useless, since the only thing it would establish is that it was a nor'easter, what its minimum pressure is, and maybe peak snowfall. I only use infoboxes to organize an abundance of stats and details, not to just take up article space.
1855:
along the coast - not very easy to see among all the other lines. I would suggest: (a) explicitly telling the reader that this image contains a line showing the route the storm took along the Eastern Seaboard; (b) highlighting that line in a different colour.
2651:
In the first sentence of the lead I'm very clear about where the storm occurred, and as far as I know, the article doesn't imply or suggest anywhere the storm's effects were confined to the coast. I'm going to assume some reader competence/common knowledge.
2868:
You give Kocin and Uccellini year in the text as 2004, but are silent on when "more recent" is in the next sentence. This phrase ("more recent") will date badly as well, unless you explicitly say the year that the "more recent" data was published or
2461:
In the northern hemisphere, low pressure systems rotate counterclockwise, or from south to east to north to west and back to south. The back-end precip was simply following the circulatory nature of the low, notwithstanding its directional movement.
3486:
OK, thanks for explaining that. I find it helps to look at other articles and see what level they are pitched at, and try and get articles to generally fit within a simple to complex gradient, rather than be very different from similar articles.
1301:
I've actually never heard of mmHg being used in the real world, especially in US-related context. I guess I could add a third conversion if you really wanted it, but nothing else is converted to metric, so I'm not sure how well that would work.
3164:
of 22-28 February 1969. To the east, North Atlantic Oscillation values ranged from neutral to negative during the general time frame of the December 1969 nor'easter, trending more consistently negative in the days surrounding its genesis."
3015:
Overall I enjoyed the article, and the link to the photo was good. Not enough people do that, though I was hoping for more than just one photo! I was going to ask if there were any satellite pictures, but it might be a bit early for that.
3106:
And thinking on this some more, given the political fallout from the February storm, did this give rise to a better response to the December storm? Hopefully some sources will have covered that angle. You could also add this article to
422:
Since Vermont was mentioned in the previous sentence and not this one, it's possible that there could be confusion as to what state Deane was governor of. Maybe you could add something like "In response," to the beginning of the above
1896:
The tweak to the caption does ease my concern, but I'm puzzled as to why you think avoiding further in-text elaboration is a good thing? Are you worried that further in-text elaboration may drift away from what the sources are saying?
3608:
The second two are not strictly speaking actionable, but I think the first two are (or should be otherwise addressed or a reason given for not making changes). After that, I should be ready to support or not (am unlikely to oppose).
1681:
It was associated with the storm's development. Whether it was geographically behind or ahead of the storm I don't know, but it was situated generally south of its center until the low stalled and the jet caught up with it.
117:
2876:
I'm honestly not sure. The website with said recent data is obviously dynamic, and updates constantly with new storm system ratings, but I have no idea when they rated the '69 storm – except that it was since 2004.
3099:
to a list of the worst NESIS storms, but leave the reader to try and work out for themselves that you are (possibly) referring to the storms of 8-10 February 1969 and 22-28 February 1969. Incidentally, linking
1934:
A map showing the track of the storm would help here (the closest seems to be the snowfall map, which sort of shows the track). And a 3D animation showing the storm dynamics would help in the next paragraph as
2769:
You switch between using the words "storm" and "cyclone" - this could easily confuse some readers unless you make clear the distinction and that they are the same object at different intensities (or whatever).
3245:
gives a good idea of the size that a nor'easter can attain. Would this storm have been of a comparable size? If the sources are silent on this, can you say what the extreme points are at the point of peak
3241:
non-US readers may not be familiar with. Did the snowfall extend outwards for 10s of kilometres? 100s of kilometres? 1000s of kilometres? How far out into the ocean did the rainfall extend? The picture at
3266:
satellite picture would indeed be helpful, but again, that luxury simply doesn't exist. At the very least, the surface maps give a good indication of where the precipitation (shaded in gray) covered.
3211:
rather than a direct correlation they have made. As Hurricanehink's point above seemed never to have been fully addressed, maybe ask him about this? I'm happy to let other comment on this aspect now.
2361:"high winds", "bitter winds" and "gale-force winds", but don't use the phrase "wind speed" anywhere and only seem to give one wind speed measurement (55 m/s). Can you not say more on the wind speeds?
2612:
I mention inland snowfall totals and effects numerous times in the article, so I think it should be clear that the storm was not confined to the coast (the snowfall map also clearly indicates this).
2221:
The tilt is "northwest to southeast" and the storm is moving "southwest to northeast"? That is consistent with the trough being part of the front and perpendicular to the forward motion of the storm?
2936:"The storm left some communities without power or telephone service for up to two days" - the impact section is very good, but can you be more precise on which two days you are referring to here?
2913:
It's a dynamic list, constantly updated since its inception after the book was published in 2004. Five years is a long time... if Knowledge is still around then, it can be changed quite easily.
2135:
produce a problem with later accessing of records. Maybe use of something like WebCite is needed? You encountered this problem yourself in this very FAC where at 15:29, 21 February 2011 you say
1771:
Actually, reading the two excerpts you mentioned again, I'm confident they mean precisely the same thing. The storm hit the coastal plain, turned north, and began to intensify at the same time.
633:
You establish the connection between the El Nino and the two other winter storms, but you don't really say why the NAO is important here. Maybe just a little blurb on what it does would be good.
226:"However, more recent data from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) classifies the nor'easter as a low-end "catastrophic" Category 4" - "catastrophic" does not appear in the cited source
3407:- I read that article and it explained a lot, but it was not linked from here (I'm aware that linking from within the bold bit is discouraged, but there are plenty of opportunities to link
3131:
template to it!). I'm not sure where your concern over the storms of the 68–69 winter comes from. I assume readers can count backwards one year and determine which season they occurred in.
3468:
any case, I think I'm aiming for somewhere in the middle, where a basic understanding of the weather (ie. the difference between a low pressure area and a high pressure area) is needed.
2094:
obvious, both links will help make absolutely clear that the image is what it says it is. For example, look at any Library of Congress image - the links are to the documentation page.
1101:
on monthly snow records in Albany, which shows the previous record was in 1915. IMO, the article appears to be poorly researched, considering how quickly I found these two items. --♫
2172:"Deepen" (for a low pressure system to intensify) is very standard meteorological terminology, and sometimes has a very specific meaning. I'm hesitant to change it to anything else.
496:
Meteorological history: "in some of the major northeastern cities and southern New England. New England...". Try to avoid the repetition in the transfer from sentence to sentence.
2422:"While located just east of Long Island, the nor'easter began its second phase of rapid strengthening and attained its peak severity" - again, no time or date provided for this.
2990:
In general, I'm uncomfortable with all the units being in shorthand. I much prefer to see them written out in full the first time they appear, and then in shorthand thereafter.
2417:"Upon reaching New Jersey, the storm center slowed drastically and remained steady in intensity" - you don't give a date or time for this, though it seems a fairly key moment.
1444:
Again, I know there is a consensus that terms can be linked and followed for people to understand them, but that fails to cater for readers of a printed copy of this article.
580:- so because of the lack of snow removal, some communities were isolated? IDK, I feel that could be better worded. Is there an estimate on the number of communities isolated?
1533:"A localized southerly low-level jet developed by midday over Mississippi and Alabama and drifted eastward." - is this part of the developing storm, or something different?
1093:
I think further research needs to be done about Vermont. You don't specify where the peak total was in Vermont, just that 29.8 in fell in Burlington. A quick Google search
2792:
To some people, a cyclone is a hurricane. No, really. Maybe add a note somewhere that "cyclone" in this article refers to cyclonic storm systems, not to tropical cyclones?
3430:
I found a way to link the nor'easter article in the first sentence. Are there any other outstanding specific examples of things you think need to be explained in-text?
269:
The only info I used from the article is what was available from the preview snippet. Do I still need to mark it as subscription? Thanks for the review, in any case.
1811:
lead says "Upon reaching the U.S. East Coast", but the main text seems to say it was held off the coast by the front and diverted north. Should the lead say "Upon
1017:
Alright, I can see your viewpoint. Personally, I disagree, since linking and converting are totally different, since the latter is for accessibility concerns. --♫
640:
The effects of NAO are still being debated in meteorology circles, but there are definitely some correlations. It's just a neutral, objective observation for now.
360:"New England experienced a severe ice storm due as a frontal boundary established itself between warm ocean air and a wedge of cold air over interior New England."
88:
83:
2230:
miles up (to the 500-mb level), but at that point, it takes a completely different form. Instead of a closed cyclone, it's a broad, poorly defined, elongated
92:
1730:
I'm not sure I'm really following, but I changed "East Coast" to "Eastern Seaboard", which connotes less of the immediate land-sea border than "East Coast".
3329:
I haven't read through your other concerns as of yet, but I'm just going to point out that I mention the NESIS scale in the second sentence of the article.
1430:
Not really. Frontogenesis can also mean weather front strengthening/establishment, not necessarily formation. The term is linked, so I'm not too concerned.
178:
and his colleague Louis Uccellini. Notwithstanding my bias towards the article, it is clearly the most comprehensive description of the storm in existence.
75:
40:
401:
187:
1661:
more detail) or is it something that happened after the storm passed over? i.e. is the jet below, behind, or within (and part of) the developing storm?
3618:
3567:
3025:
1256:
1162:
567:
514:
432:
377:
302:
217:
165:
854:"Snow accumulated from the Appalachian Mountains in southern through western Maine, encompassing the entire Mid-Atlantic region." - missing wordfail?
2963:
Is there no way to end the article with something like "normal services had resumed in most of the affected area by XXXX" and give a date for that?
2672:
the centre of the storm moved out over the sea, but nothing is mentioned about the effects of this storm on shipping. Do the sources say anything?
1571:. Effectively, you have linked to a disambiguation section and left the lay reader in the dark as to what you were talking about in the article.
2036:
1900:
1851:
1824:
3655:
3636:
3585:
3534:
3520:
3496:
3477:
3458:
3439:
3421:
3376:
3357:
3338:
3320:
3290:
3275:
3256:
3220:
3201:
3178:
3140:
3121:
3085:
3063:
3041:
3007:
2980:
2953:
2922:
2900:
2886:
2859:
2828:
2802:
2786:
2759:
2722:
2704:
2682:
2661:
2638:
2621:
2584:
2565:
2534:
2513:
2491:
2471:
2439:
2401:
2371:
2354:
2338:
2305:
2287:
2264:
2248:
2208:
2181:
2148:
2125:
2103:
2088:
2060:
2026:
1988:
1966:
1952:
1918:
1887:
1865:
1836:
1794:
1780:
1758:
1739:
1705:
1691:
1654:
1621:
1606:
1580:
1549:
1520:
1498:
1482:
1453:
1439:
1408:
1381:
1350:
1327:
1311:
1283:
1218:
1200:
1177:
1132:
1112:
1084:
1066:
1028:
1008:
990:
979:
IDK, sometimes I just skip the lede. It's hardly a jumble if you repeat it in the lede and then in the article, although I get your point. --♫
970:
943:
923:
898:
871:
844:
814:
794:
767:
740:
707:
687:
669:
649:
624:
597:
532:
479:
465:
448:
342:
317:
278:
260:
242:
1317:
Could it be written out in full the first time it is used? In print editions, people can't hover or click through to see what something means.
961:
They're already converted previously in the article, and I try to avoid the prose just being a jumble of parenthesis and numbers if possible.
133:
2971:
I think I give a general feel for when certain aspects of recovery were completed, like, for example, the two days mentioned directly above.
30:
17:
2040:
2002:
696:
But you don't provide that context, that's my issue. It's as arbitrary as saying "the solar radiation at the time of the storm was X". --♫
289:- No dabs or dead external links. 1 external redirect which may lead to link rot; see it with the tool in the upper right of this page. --
785:
I don't think there's anything in sources or maps that establish this. It probably simply fizzled out somewhere over the North Atlantic.
2481:
What is not clear here is where the snowfall is coming from. It is propagating from somewhere to get to Long Island. From where, though?
3411:
somewhere useful in the lead). If I had had a link to follow to that article, it might have avoided some of the questions asked here!
1364:"reaching 40 in (100 cm)" - I'm not familiar with the abbreviation "in" for inches. I think this will confuse other readers as well.
1049:
Does the record in Vermont still stand? (greatest single snowfall total ever recorded in the state) - if so, that's fairly important
1097:
is 2nd on record in Burlington, recently surpassed by the blizzard in January 2010. That's a place to start. Also, I quickly found
138:
364:
I'm not sure what "due" means here. It appears to be a typo, but it could be some type of jargon, so I didn't remove it outright.
3108:
1905:
I'm striking my objection, but it would help to make clearer that if people want to understand the 'squiggles', they should read
3187:
Sorry, should have been more clear. All three storms impacted the same general region (as all NESIS storms do – hence the name "
2944:
Two days after the respective communities lost power and telephone service... I don't think there's much else to say about it.
2691:
The storm's effects at sea were probably nothing to write home about, limited to moderate rain and perhaps some choppy waters.
3111:, and consider putting that template on this article (it is interesting looking to see which of those storms are nor'easters).
3403:(rather than blizzard) is not mentioned in the lead but is mentioned a lot later on. It would probably help if you linked to
2217:"assumed a negative tilt from northwest to southeast" - this is where my mental picture broke down and I wanted an animation!
79:
1098:
3242:
2392:
to the in-article mention of gale-force winds to give readers a general idea of what kind of force they're looking for.
456:
No, it's no big deal. It was just a suggestion, and I definitely don't think it's necessary at all. Article looks good!-
1540:
It's associated with the storm, but not exclusively part of it... I go into more detail about it later in the section.
1418:"frontogenesis" - this seems like an example of using a technical term for the sake of it. It would be simpler to say "
2713:
Fair enough, though I see some other nor'easters have caused shipwrecks. Wanted to be sure this hadn't happened here.
907:
You go a lot into New England/New York impact, but there is very little about Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and southward.
418:"Governor Deane C. Davis declared a state of emergency and ordered the National Guard to assist with cleanup efforts."
2254:
That does help, but how do you think that can be expressed in the article? Is there something that can be linked to?
198:
Earwig's tool found no copyvio; manual spotchecks found no concerning paraphrasing, but not all sources were checked
1957:
Yeah. But if anyone ever does do an animation! There are some nice animations out there (just not for this storm).
1747:
Did it intensify before turning north-east, or did it turn north-east and then intensify, or both at the same time?
1823:
The storm more-or-less straddled the coast itself for most of its northward journey, as indicated by the track at
3604:
General level at which article is pitched - again, would be happier if this was brought up in a wider discussion.
3161:
3101:
578:
In the hardest-hit areas, snow removal on roadways was severely delayed, and the storm isolated some communities.
356:
I like this article! Though I didn't notice any huge problems, I wanted to give you a few rewording suggestions:
71:
64:
2329:
It's probably been playing proverbial tag with the low, until it stalled and the jet was able to wrap into it.
2014:
1906:
723:
Little quibble - shouldn't the images alternate right, left, right? Or, did you do the placement intentionally?
3399:'. Would it be correct to apply these terms to at least parts of the storm? You mention gale-force winds, but
2742:"The storm moved slowly northeastward over the next 24 hours" - is this still the 27th or is this now the 28th
1488:
I still see "Christmas Day" in the article. The one you fixed earlier was one of two instances of this phrase.
3076:
of the ENSO period, they're a product of it (although it might lean more toward correlation than causation).
3149:
If the storms affected two different areas, why do you indirectly mention the Lindsay storm in the lead (it
1903:- I presume that can be freely modified? Would highlighting the storm track misrepresent things in some way?
1157:
1127:
1107:
1023:
985:
938:
809:
702:
664:
3651:
3563:
3516:
3473:
3435:
3353:
3334:
3271:
3197:
3136:
3081:
3037:
3003:
2976:
2949:
2918:
2882:
2855:
2824:
2782:
2755:
2700:
2657:
2617:
2561:
2509:
2467:
2435:
2397:
2334:
2283:
2244:
2204:
2177:
2121:
2084:
2056:
2022:
1984:
1948:
1883:
1832:
1776:
1735:
1687:
1650:
1602:
1545:
1516:
1478:
1435:
1404:
1377:
1346:
1307:
1279:
1252:
1214:
1173:
1080:
1062:
1004:
966:
919:
894:
867:
840:
790:
763:
736:
683:
645:
620:
593:
563:
528:
475:
444:
397:
373:
313:
274:
238:
213:
183:
161:
2842:"The cyclone was rated by Kocin and Uccellini" - maybe add "meteorological researchers" before the names?
2628:
delayed movement leading to heavy snowfall on its inland western edges in Upstate New York and Vermont."?
1943:
That's quite the tall order! I'm not sure I can do much about this, short of providing more static maps.
1637:
Is "Mississippi and Alabama" synonymous with "southern Gulf Coast states" used in the previous sentence?
3632:
3614:
3581:
3530:
3492:
3454:
3417:
3372:
3316:
3303:
3286:
3252:
3216:
3174:
3117:
3059:
3021:
2896:
2798:
2718:
2678:
2634:
2580:
2530:
2487:
2367:
2350:
2301:
2260:
2144:
2099:
1962:
1914:
1861:
1790:
1754:
1701:
1667:
1617:
1576:
1568:
1494:
1449:
1323:
1196:
1188:
508:
333:
256:
2344:
Again, is it possible to tweak the balance slightly to explain things a bit more within the article?
932:
Any luck? It was a huge area affected, according to the map, but you don't go into it at all. --♫
3601:
The dynamically updating sources - would be happier if this was brought up in a wider discussion.
2479:"snowfall propagated around the western end of the cyclone, reaching as far south as Long Island"
1152:
1122:
1102:
1094:
1018:
980:
933:
804:
697:
659:
3647:
3559:
3512:
3469:
3431:
3349:
3330:
3302:
Another point about dynamically updated meteorology sources becomes apparent when you compare
3267:
3193:
3132:
3077:
3033:
2999:
2972:
2945:
2914:
2878:
2851:
2820:
2778:
2751:
2696:
2653:
2613:
2557:
2552:
2505:
2463:
2431:
2393:
2330:
2279:
2240:
2200:
2173:
2117:
2080:
2052:
2018:
1980:
1944:
1879:
1828:
1772:
1731:
1683:
1646:
1598:
1541:
1512:
1474:
1431:
1400:
1373:
1342:
1303:
1275:
1248:
1210:
1169:
1076:
1058:
1000:
962:
915:
890:
863:
836:
786:
759:
732:
679:
641:
616:
589:
559:
524:
471:
440:
393:
369:
309:
270:
234:
209:
179:
157:
1878:
I clarified the caption a bit, which should negate the need for further in-text elaboration.
53:
3628:
3610:
3577:
3526:
3488:
3450:
3413:
3368:
3312:
3282:
3248:
3212:
3170:
3113:
3055:
3017:
2892:
2794:
2714:
2674:
2630:
2576:
2526:
2483:
2363:
2346:
2297:
2256:
2140:
2095:
1958:
1910:
1857:
1786:
1750:
1697:
1663:
1613:
1572:
1564:
1490:
1445:
1319:
1192:
501:
461:
428:
324:
296:
252:
2891:
Hmm. It's a problem, then. You still need a date. In five years time it will look silly.
1465:
Throwing in "Christmas Day" may confuse those who don't realise that this is 25 December
2389:
731:
Yeah, I played around with it and found this is the most visually appealing alignment.
3550:
The low-level jet link, which as I pointed out is effectively an undisambiguated link.
1785:
On re-reading, I agree with you. I'm being overly pedantic here - apologies for that.
3155:
previous winter, which produced two significant storms in the Northeast United States
1844:"The storm more-or-less straddled the coast itself for most of its northward journey"
1419:
1244:
3307:
678:
It's not that important, it's just something for a little meteorological context.
499:
Impact and aftermath: Excess word in "drifts reached up to to 30 feet in height."
109:
3408:
3404:
2548:
2388:
Since there probably isn't much in the way of exact surface reports, I've linked
3048:
In the first few sentences of the main article, would it not be simpler to say:
1560:
2164:"As the cyclone deepened" - what does it mean when you say a cyclone "deepens"?
1266:"The low peaked" - I'm guessing this has come up before, but it sounds strange.
2017:, which explains the "squiggles on paper", is linked in the previous caption.
1556:
457:
424:
291:
175:
3400:
3396:
1645:
Not necessarily, but I'm not sure what you're shooting for to be honest.
2043:
come from? Surely similar links and authorship details are needed there?
658:
Ehh, IDK, there's just nothing there that indicates any importance. --♫
409:"and a record at the time of $ 2 million USD was spent on snow removal."
2816:
2544:
2191:"several miles into the atmosphere" - maybe add the word "up" in there?
2039:
has a source linked and an author listed and looks fine, but where did
413:"and $ 2 million USD was spent on snow removal, a record at that time."
1391:"Due to a number of factors including" - comma needed after 'factors'.
3597:
The wording of the opening sentences in the main body of the article.
999:
It's like how we don't link things more than once the way I view it.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
3627:- following review and discussion above, am now happy to support.
1827:. I think the tweak I mentioned above should resolve this issue.
3392:
2750:
Should be more clear now that I've tweaked the preceding stuff.
889:
True enough, think I relied on the source too literally. Fixed.
1745:
That does help, but it is the chronology I'm focusing on here.
201:
Be consistent in whether you have last name or first name first
2071:
page documenting the image details, not the image file itself.
862:
Yeah, not sure what I was trying to say, so changed entirely.
384:"which, in Albany, surpassed the old record by 17 in (43 cm)."
118:
Featured article candidates/December 1969 nor'easter/archive1
1846:
in the article? I must confess here that I had not actually
3153:
one of the two storms mentioned in this phrase, isn't it?
3054:
Or does that miss the point you are trying to make there?
1121:
Much better now, and great find on the other impact. --♫
143:
3097:"two significant storms in the Northeast United States"
105:
101:
97:
57:
1597:, which should eliminate the confusion with aviation.
2819:, which is a broad term for any low pressure system.
1842:
That does help. Is it possible to put something like
233:
I guess they must have changed the wording... fixed.
3072:
That's not really accurate, since the storms aren't
1247:
retained a bit well into the dog days of summer. :)
954:
Why no conversion for 40 inches, 30 feet, or 1 feet?
548:
and at least 20 deaths are blamed on the nor'easter.
1341:them when Knowledge is designed to be read online.
251:Ref 12 should be noted as subscription/paywalled.
3668:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
558:Eh, dunno, it sounded good at the time. Changed.
2199:Eh, I feel like it would be a little redundant.
388:Maybe this could be changed to "former record"?
2430:I think these two bullets should be addressed.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
2777:Storm and cyclone are pretty much synonymous.
3674:No further edits should be made to this page.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
2137:"I guess they must have changed the wording"
1372:Alright, spelled out on the first instance.
1209:I'll keep an eye out for places to link it.
2695:seems to be available on shipping issues.
1044:When was the former record set in Albany?
308:Not sure how to remedy that to be honest.
122:
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
3558:Take a look at my in-text clarification.
3545:(of unresolved bits raised by me above)
1187:- article is currently only linked from
826:Also, any reason there isn't an infobox?
125:
115:
2037:File:December 26, 1969 nor'easter.jpg
2013:Added a bit of geographical context.
1901:File:December 26, 1969 nor'easter.jpg
1852:File:December 26, 1969 nor'easter.jpg
1825:File:December 26, 1969 nor'easter.jpg
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
3511:Check out what I did with the maps.
615:Yeah, I removed the third instance.
3525:Looks good. Thanks for doing that.
2079:Not sure I follow unfortunately...
2051:Not sure what happened, but fixed.
2041:File:December 1969 nor'easter 2.jpg
2003:File:December 1969 nor'easter 2.jpg
1559:and there the reader is faced with
2504:From the other side of the storm.
24:
2556:understanding of the atmosphere.
914:I'll see if I can find any more.
3109:Template:United States Blizzards
3104:should be possible around here.
2524:need to make this explicit, IMO.
2116:I see, fixed on the NESIS map.
368:Fixed, bit of an "oops" there.
758:Alright, changed to the date.
1:
1075:Nothing for either of these.
533:02:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
515:02:26, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
480:20:13, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
466:19:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
449:19:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
433:03:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
402:19:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
378:19:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
343:20:36, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
318:02:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
303:01:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
279:15:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
261:14:19, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
243:15:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
218:15:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
188:02:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
166:02:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
3243:File:GreatBlizzardof2006.jpg
1593:I clarified that it's a jet
777:How/when did the storm die?
287:Disambig/External Link check
31:featured article nomination
3691:
3656:00:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3637:00:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3619:00:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3586:00:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3568:00:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3535:00:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3521:20:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
3497:00:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3478:00:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3459:00:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3440:20:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
3422:08:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
3377:00:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3358:20:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
3339:13:36, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
3321:09:27, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
3291:00:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3276:20:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
3257:08:24, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
3221:00:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3202:00:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3179:00:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
3141:20:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
3122:08:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
3086:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
3064:03:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2923:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2901:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2829:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2803:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2723:00:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
2705:20:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
2683:08:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
2662:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2639:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2585:00:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
2566:20:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
2535:08:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
2514:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2492:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2402:20:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
2372:08:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
2355:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2306:08:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
2288:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2265:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2149:08:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
2126:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2104:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1989:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1967:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1919:08:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
1888:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1866:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1795:08:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
1781:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1759:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1706:08:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
1692:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1622:08:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
1607:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1581:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1521:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1499:03:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1454:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1351:20:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1328:02:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1133:22:53, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1113:22:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1085:20:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1029:22:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1009:20:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
944:22:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
708:22:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
688:20:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
3042:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
3026:12:02, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
3008:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2981:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2954:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2887:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2860:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2787:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2760:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2622:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2472:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2440:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2339:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2249:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2209:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2182:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2089:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2061:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
2027:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1953:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1837:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1740:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1655:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1550:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1483:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1440:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1409:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1382:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1312:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1284:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1257:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1219:14:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1201:09:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
1178:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
1163:21:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
1067:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
1057:I'll check on these too.
991:02:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
971:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
924:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
899:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
872:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
845:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
815:02:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
795:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
768:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
741:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
670:02:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
650:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
625:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
598:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
568:21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
3671:Please do not modify it.
3102:February 1969 nor'easter
2015:Surface weather analysis
1907:surface weather analysis
550:- why the present tense?
72:December 1969 nor'easter
65:December 1969 nor'easter
36:Please do not modify it.
1555:section of the article
1420:weather front formation
1168:Thanks for the review!
523:Got them both, thanks.
3167:
3053:
3158:
3049:
1815:the U.S. East Coast"?
56:04:14, 14 March 2011
3304:List of NESIS storms
2477:Right. It now says:
1979:I'll watch for one.
1569:African easterly jet
1274:Added another word.
1189:List of NESIS storms
1147:Any damage estimate?
411:could be changed to
63:
2998:Got this I think.
355:
322:Took care of it.--
2553:low-pressure area
1160:
1130:
1110:
1026:
988:
941:
812:
705:
667:
470:Cool, cheers. :)
351:
169:
151:
150:
3682:
3673:
3308:the current list
1511:Oops... got it.
1156:
1126:
1106:
1095:shows this storm
1022:
984:
937:
808:
701:
663:
511:
504:
338:
329:
299:
294:
154:
123:
113:
95:
48:The article was
38:
3690:
3689:
3685:
3684:
3683:
3681:
3680:
3679:
3678:
3669:
1565:Valley exit jet
1422:", wouldn't it?
510:27 and counting
509:
502:
334:
325:
297:
292:
86:
70:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3688:
3686:
3677:
3676:
3663:
3661:
3660:
3659:
3658:
3640:
3639:
3606:
3605:
3602:
3599:
3593:
3592:
3591:
3590:
3589:
3588:
3571:
3570:
3553:
3552:
3540:
3539:
3538:
3537:
3508:
3507:
3506:
3505:
3504:
3503:
3502:
3501:
3500:
3499:
3481:
3480:
3462:
3461:
3443:
3442:
3425:
3424:
3386:
3385:
3384:
3383:
3382:
3381:
3380:
3379:
3361:
3360:
3342:
3341:
3324:
3323:
3298:
3297:
3296:
3295:
3294:
3293:
3260:
3259:
3236:
3235:
3234:
3233:
3232:
3231:
3230:
3229:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3225:
3224:
3223:
3205:
3204:
3182:
3181:
3144:
3143:
3125:
3124:
3089:
3088:
3067:
3066:
3045:
3044:
3013:
3012:
3011:
3010:
2993:
2992:
2986:
2985:
2984:
2983:
2966:
2965:
2959:
2958:
2957:
2956:
2939:
2938:
2932:
2931:
2930:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2926:
2925:
2906:
2905:
2904:
2903:
2871:
2870:
2865:
2864:
2863:
2862:
2845:
2844:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2808:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2772:
2771:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2745:
2744:
2738:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2708:
2707:
2686:
2685:
2665:
2664:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2607:
2606:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2593:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2569:
2568:
2538:
2537:
2517:
2516:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2456:
2455:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2425:
2424:
2419:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2390:Beaufort scale
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2324:
2323:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2291:
2290:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2224:
2223:
2218:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2194:
2193:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2167:
2166:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2129:
2128:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2074:
2073:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2046:
2045:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2008:
2007:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1938:
1937:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1899:And regarding
1891:
1890:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1818:
1817:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1725:
1724:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1640:
1639:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1535:
1534:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1468:
1467:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1425:
1424:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1394:
1393:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1367:
1366:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1296:
1295:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1269:
1268:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1237:
1236:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1204:
1203:
1181:
1180:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1116:
1115:
1088:
1087:
1070:
1069:
1052:
1051:
1046:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1012:
1011:
994:
993:
974:
973:
956:
955:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
927:
926:
909:
908:
904:
903:
902:
901:
884:
883:
877:
876:
875:
874:
857:
856:
850:
849:
848:
847:
829:
828:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
798:
797:
780:
779:
773:
772:
771:
770:
753:
752:
746:
745:
744:
743:
726:
725:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
691:
690:
673:
672:
653:
652:
635:
634:
630:
629:
628:
627:
610:
609:
603:
602:
601:
600:
583:
582:
573:
572:
571:
570:
553:
552:
538:
537:
536:
535:
518:
517:
497:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
405:
404:
381:
380:
349:
348:
347:
346:
284:
283:
282:
281:
264:
263:
248:
247:
246:
245:
228:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
203:
202:
199:
171:
170:
156:Nominator(s):
149:
148:
147:
146:
144:External links
141:
136:
128:
127:
121:
120:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3687:
3675:
3672:
3666:
3665:
3664:
3657:
3653:
3649:
3644:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3638:
3634:
3630:
3626:
3623:
3622:
3621:
3620:
3616:
3612:
3603:
3600:
3598:
3595:
3594:
3587:
3583:
3579:
3575:
3574:
3573:
3572:
3569:
3565:
3561:
3557:
3556:
3555:
3554:
3551:
3548:
3547:
3546:
3544:
3536:
3532:
3528:
3524:
3523:
3522:
3518:
3514:
3510:
3509:
3498:
3494:
3490:
3485:
3484:
3483:
3482:
3479:
3475:
3471:
3466:
3465:
3464:
3463:
3460:
3456:
3452:
3447:
3446:
3445:
3444:
3441:
3437:
3433:
3429:
3428:
3427:
3426:
3423:
3419:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3394:
3388:
3387:
3378:
3374:
3370:
3365:
3364:
3363:
3362:
3359:
3355:
3351:
3346:
3345:
3344:
3343:
3340:
3336:
3332:
3328:
3327:
3326:
3325:
3322:
3318:
3314:
3311:
3309:
3305:
3300:
3299:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3279:
3278:
3277:
3273:
3269:
3264:
3263:
3262:
3261:
3258:
3254:
3250:
3247:
3244:
3238:
3237:
3222:
3218:
3214:
3209:
3208:
3207:
3206:
3203:
3199:
3195:
3190:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3180:
3176:
3172:
3166:
3163:
3162:Lindsay storm
3156:
3152:
3148:
3147:
3146:
3145:
3142:
3138:
3134:
3129:
3128:
3127:
3126:
3123:
3119:
3115:
3112:
3110:
3103:
3098:
3093:
3092:
3091:
3090:
3087:
3083:
3079:
3075:
3071:
3070:
3069:
3068:
3065:
3061:
3057:
3052:
3047:
3046:
3043:
3039:
3035:
3030:
3029:
3028:
3027:
3023:
3019:
3009:
3005:
3001:
2997:
2996:
2995:
2994:
2991:
2988:
2987:
2982:
2978:
2974:
2970:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2964:
2961:
2960:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2943:
2942:
2941:
2940:
2937:
2934:
2933:
2924:
2920:
2916:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2907:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2875:
2874:
2873:
2872:
2867:
2866:
2861:
2857:
2853:
2850:Sounds good.
2849:
2848:
2847:
2846:
2843:
2840:
2839:
2830:
2826:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2813:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2804:
2800:
2796:
2793:
2790:
2789:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2770:
2767:
2766:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2743:
2740:
2739:
2724:
2720:
2716:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2706:
2702:
2698:
2694:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2684:
2680:
2676:
2673:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2663:
2659:
2655:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2629:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2605:
2602:
2601:
2586:
2582:
2578:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2554:
2550:
2546:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2539:
2536:
2532:
2528:
2525:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2515:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2482:
2480:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2454:
2452:
2447:
2446:
2441:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2423:
2420:
2418:
2415:
2414:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2380:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2362:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2352:
2348:
2345:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2322:
2319:
2318:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2296:Fair enough.
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2255:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2237:
2233:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2222:
2219:
2216:
2215:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2192:
2189:
2188:
2183:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2165:
2162:
2161:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2127:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2072:
2068:
2067:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2044:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2033:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2006:
2004:
2000:
1999:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1936:
1932:
1931:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1902:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1856:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1816:
1814:
1808:
1807:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1749:
1748:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1718:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1696:Fair enough.
1695:
1694:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1669:
1665:
1662:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1638:
1635:
1634:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1531:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1489:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1473:Yeah, fixed.
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1466:
1463:
1462:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1423:
1421:
1416:
1415:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1392:
1389:
1388:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1318:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1294:
1291:
1290:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1267:
1264:
1263:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1245:The Snow Hole
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1235:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1159:
1154:
1153:Hurricanehink
1146:
1145:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1123:Hurricanehink
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1109:
1104:
1103:Hurricanehink
1100:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1030:
1025:
1020:
1019:Hurricanehink
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
997:
996:
995:
992:
987:
982:
981:Hurricanehink
978:
977:
976:
975:
972:
968:
964:
960:
959:
958:
957:
953:
952:
945:
940:
935:
934:Hurricanehink
931:
930:
929:
928:
925:
921:
917:
913:
912:
911:
910:
906:
905:
900:
896:
892:
888:
887:
886:
885:
882:
879:
878:
873:
869:
865:
861:
860:
859:
858:
855:
852:
851:
846:
842:
838:
833:
832:
831:
830:
827:
824:
823:
816:
811:
806:
805:Hurricanehink
802:
801:
800:
799:
796:
792:
788:
784:
783:
782:
781:
778:
775:
774:
769:
765:
761:
757:
756:
755:
754:
751:
748:
747:
742:
738:
734:
730:
729:
728:
727:
724:
721:
720:
709:
704:
699:
698:Hurricanehink
695:
694:
693:
692:
689:
685:
681:
677:
676:
675:
674:
671:
666:
661:
660:Hurricanehink
657:
656:
655:
654:
651:
647:
643:
639:
638:
637:
636:
632:
631:
626:
622:
618:
614:
613:
612:
611:
608:
605:
604:
599:
595:
591:
587:
586:
585:
584:
581:
579:
575:
574:
569:
565:
561:
557:
556:
555:
554:
551:
549:
545:
544:
543:
542:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
520:
519:
516:
512:
506:
505:
498:
495:
494:
493:
491:
481:
477:
473:
469:
468:
467:
463:
459:
455:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
420:
419:
415:
414:
410:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
386:
385:
379:
375:
371:
367:
366:
365:
362:
361:
357:
354:
345:
344:
339:
337:
331:
330:
328:
321:
320:
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
305:
304:
301:
300:
295:
288:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
266:
265:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:
244:
240:
236:
232:
231:
230:
229:
225:
224:
219:
215:
211:
207:
206:
205:
204:
200:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:Source review
190:
189:
185:
181:
177:
168:
167:
163:
159:
153:
152:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
124:
119:
116:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
3670:
3667:
3662:
3648:Juliancolton
3624:
3607:
3596:
3560:Juliancolton
3549:
3542:
3541:
3513:Juliancolton
3470:Juliancolton
3432:Juliancolton
3389:
3350:Juliancolton
3331:Juliancolton
3301:
3268:Juliancolton
3239:
3194:Juliancolton
3188:
3159:
3154:
3150:
3133:Juliancolton
3105:
3096:
3078:Juliancolton
3073:
3050:
3034:Juliancolton
3014:
3000:Juliancolton
2989:
2973:Juliancolton
2962:
2946:Juliancolton
2935:
2915:Juliancolton
2879:Juliancolton
2852:Juliancolton
2841:
2821:Juliancolton
2791:
2779:Juliancolton
2768:
2752:Juliancolton
2741:
2697:Juliancolton
2670:
2654:Juliancolton
2626:
2614:Juliancolton
2603:
2558:Juliancolton
2522:
2506:Juliancolton
2478:
2476:
2464:Juliancolton
2450:
2448:
2432:Juliancolton
2421:
2416:
2394:Juliancolton
2359:
2343:
2331:Juliancolton
2320:
2280:Juliancolton
2253:
2241:Juliancolton
2235:
2231:
2220:
2201:Juliancolton
2190:
2174:Juliancolton
2163:
2136:
2118:Juliancolton
2081:Juliancolton
2069:
2053:Juliancolton
2035:
2019:Juliancolton
2001:
1981:Juliancolton
1945:Juliancolton
1933:
1898:
1880:Juliancolton
1847:
1843:
1841:
1829:Juliancolton
1812:
1809:
1773:Juliancolton
1746:
1744:
1732:Juliancolton
1720:
1684:Juliancolton
1659:
1647:Juliancolton
1636:
1599:Juliancolton
1594:
1542:Juliancolton
1513:Juliancolton
1487:
1475:Juliancolton
1464:
1432:Juliancolton
1417:
1401:Juliancolton
1390:
1374:Juliancolton
1363:
1343:Juliancolton
1316:
1304:Juliancolton
1292:
1276:Juliancolton
1265:
1249:Juliancolton
1232:
1226:
1225:
1211:Juliancolton
1184:
1170:Juliancolton
1150:
1077:Juliancolton
1059:Juliancolton
1048:
1043:
1001:Juliancolton
963:Juliancolton
916:Juliancolton
891:Juliancolton
880:
864:Juliancolton
853:
837:Juliancolton
825:
787:Juliancolton
776:
760:Juliancolton
749:
733:Juliancolton
722:
680:Juliancolton
642:Juliancolton
617:Juliancolton
606:
590:Juliancolton
577:
576:
560:Juliancolton
547:
546:
540:
539:
525:Juliancolton
500:
489:
488:
472:Juliancolton
453:
441:Juliancolton
421:
417:
416:
412:
408:
406:
394:Juliancolton
392:Sure thing.
387:
383:
382:
370:Juliancolton
363:
359:
358:
352:
350:
340:
335:
326:
323:
310:Juliancolton
290:
286:
285:
271:Juliancolton
235:Juliancolton
210:Juliancolton
192:
191:
180:Juliancolton
172:
158:Juliancolton
155:
139:Citation bot
69:
49:
47:
35:
28:
1813:approaching
1561:Barrier jet
1099:this report
803:M'kay. --♫
336:Communicate
54:Laser brain
3629:Carcharoth
3611:Carcharoth
3578:Carcharoth
3527:Carcharoth
3489:Carcharoth
3451:Carcharoth
3414:Carcharoth
3409:nor'easter
3405:nor'easter
3369:Carcharoth
3313:Carcharoth
3283:Carcharoth
3249:Carcharoth
3246:intensity?
3213:Carcharoth
3171:Carcharoth
3114:Carcharoth
3056:Carcharoth
3018:Carcharoth
2893:Carcharoth
2795:Carcharoth
2715:Carcharoth
2675:Carcharoth
2631:Carcharoth
2577:Carcharoth
2549:nor'easter
2527:Carcharoth
2484:Carcharoth
2451:southwards
2364:Carcharoth
2347:Carcharoth
2298:Carcharoth
2257:Carcharoth
2141:Carcharoth
2096:Carcharoth
1959:Carcharoth
1911:Carcharoth
1858:Carcharoth
1787:Carcharoth
1751:Carcharoth
1698:Carcharoth
1664:Carcharoth
1614:Carcharoth
1573:Carcharoth
1557:jet stream
1491:Carcharoth
1446:Carcharoth
1320:Carcharoth
1193:Carcharoth
588:Reworded.
503:Giants2008
423:sentence?-
253:Nikkimaria
176:Paul Kocin
3576:Perfect.
3401:snowstorm
3189:Northeast
2869:analyzed.
2815:I linked
3397:blizzard
1227:Comments
490:Comments
407:Perhaps
353:Comments
134:Analysis
50:promoted
3625:Support
3543:Summary
3395:' and '
2817:cyclone
2693:Nothing
2545:cyclone
1185:Comment
541:Support
454:Support
327:Tærkast
208:On it.
126:Toolbox
89:protect
84:history
2551:, and
2232:region
1595:stream
1567:, and
1399:Done.
93:delete
2543:With
2236:lower
1935:well.
1850:that
458:RHM22
425:RHM22
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
3652:talk
3633:talk
3615:talk
3582:talk
3564:talk
3531:talk
3517:talk
3493:talk
3474:talk
3455:talk
3436:talk
3418:talk
3393:gale
3373:talk
3354:talk
3335:talk
3317:talk
3306:and
3287:talk
3272:talk
3253:talk
3217:talk
3198:talk
3175:talk
3137:talk
3118:talk
3082:talk
3074:part
3060:talk
3038:talk
3022:talk
3004:talk
2977:talk
2950:talk
2919:talk
2897:talk
2883:talk
2856:talk
2825:talk
2799:talk
2783:talk
2756:talk
2719:talk
2701:talk
2679:talk
2658:talk
2635:talk
2618:talk
2581:talk
2562:talk
2531:talk
2510:talk
2488:talk
2468:talk
2436:talk
2398:talk
2368:talk
2351:talk
2335:talk
2302:talk
2284:talk
2261:talk
2245:talk
2205:talk
2178:talk
2145:talk
2122:talk
2100:talk
2085:talk
2057:talk
2023:talk
1985:talk
1963:talk
1949:talk
1915:talk
1884:talk
1862:talk
1848:seen
1833:talk
1791:talk
1777:talk
1755:talk
1736:talk
1702:talk
1688:talk
1668:talk
1651:talk
1618:talk
1603:talk
1577:talk
1546:talk
1517:talk
1495:talk
1479:talk
1450:talk
1436:talk
1405:talk
1378:talk
1347:talk
1324:talk
1308:talk
1280:talk
1253:talk
1215:talk
1197:talk
1174:talk
1158:talk
1151:--♫
1128:talk
1108:talk
1081:talk
1063:talk
1024:talk
1005:talk
986:talk
967:talk
939:talk
920:talk
895:talk
868:talk
841:talk
810:talk
791:talk
764:talk
737:talk
703:talk
684:talk
665:talk
646:talk
621:talk
594:talk
564:talk
529:talk
476:talk
462:talk
445:talk
429:talk
398:talk
374:talk
314:talk
293:Pres
275:talk
257:talk
239:talk
214:talk
184:talk
162:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
2234:of
1161:)
1131:)
1111:)
1027:)
989:)
942:)
813:)
706:)
668:)
52:by
3654:)
3635:)
3617:)
3584:)
3566:)
3533:)
3519:)
3495:)
3476:)
3457:)
3438:)
3420:)
3375:)
3356:)
3337:)
3319:)
3289:)
3274:)
3255:)
3219:)
3200:)
3177:)
3151:is
3139:)
3120:)
3084:)
3062:)
3040:)
3024:)
3006:)
2979:)
2952:)
2921:)
2899:)
2885:)
2858:)
2827:)
2801:)
2785:)
2758:)
2721:)
2703:)
2681:)
2660:)
2637:)
2620:)
2583:)
2564:)
2547:,
2533:)
2512:)
2490:)
2470:)
2438:)
2400:)
2370:)
2353:)
2337:)
2304:)
2286:)
2263:)
2247:)
2207:)
2180:)
2147:)
2139:.
2124:)
2102:)
2087:)
2059:)
2025:)
1987:)
1965:)
1951:)
1917:)
1886:)
1864:)
1835:)
1793:)
1779:)
1757:)
1738:)
1704:)
1690:)
1653:)
1620:)
1605:)
1579:)
1563:,
1548:)
1519:)
1497:)
1481:)
1452:)
1438:)
1407:)
1380:)
1349:)
1326:)
1310:)
1282:)
1255:)
1217:)
1199:)
1176:)
1083:)
1065:)
1007:)
969:)
922:)
897:)
870:)
843:)
793:)
766:)
739:)
686:)
648:)
623:)
596:)
566:)
531:)
513:)
492:–
478:)
464:)
447:)
431:)
400:)
376:)
341:)
316:)
277:)
259:)
241:)
216:)
186:)
164:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
59:.
33:.
3650:(
3631:(
3613:(
3580:(
3562:(
3529:(
3515:(
3491:(
3472:(
3453:(
3434:(
3416:(
3371:(
3352:(
3333:(
3315:(
3285:(
3270:(
3251:(
3215:(
3196:(
3173:(
3135:(
3116:(
3080:(
3058:(
3036:(
3020:(
3002:(
2975:(
2948:(
2917:(
2895:(
2881:(
2854:(
2823:(
2797:(
2781:(
2754:(
2717:(
2699:(
2677:(
2656:(
2633:(
2616:(
2579:(
2560:(
2529:(
2508:(
2486:(
2466:(
2434:(
2396:(
2366:(
2349:(
2333:(
2300:(
2282:(
2259:(
2243:(
2203:(
2176:(
2143:(
2120:(
2098:(
2083:(
2055:(
2021:(
1983:(
1961:(
1947:(
1913:(
1882:(
1860:(
1831:(
1789:(
1775:(
1753:(
1734:(
1700:(
1686:(
1670:)
1666:(
1649:(
1616:(
1601:(
1575:(
1544:(
1515:(
1493:(
1477:(
1448:(
1434:(
1403:(
1376:(
1345:(
1322:(
1306:(
1278:(
1251:(
1213:(
1195:(
1172:(
1155:(
1125:(
1105:(
1079:(
1061:(
1021:(
1003:(
983:(
965:(
936:(
918:(
893:(
866:(
839:(
807:(
789:(
762:(
735:(
700:(
682:(
662:(
644:(
619:(
592:(
562:(
527:(
507:(
474:(
460:(
443:(
427:(
396:(
372:(
332:(
312:(
298:N
273:(
255:(
237:(
212:(
182:(
160:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.