943:
Team/Actor/Actress winners? I fail to see why Emmy origins are necessary; we don't explain that 'Oscar' comes from an Uncle Oscar and that it weighs 8 pounds in every
Academy Award article. Did the lack of integrity have to do with Outstanding Series balloting? Have there been any winner controversies? Is there a reason why the number of nominees has ranged from 3 to 6? If nothing can be said about the award other than that X, Y and Z won it, I'm not sure why it should be featured. Also, 1994 is missing the yellow.
970:
866:
825:
624:
587:
538:
481:
418:
243:
445:
For the record, when I said number of shows I meant the number of different shows, not the total number of awards ceremonies. Far fewer than 43 shows have won, by the looks of it. I still think the lead is short and that more could be done to get at least two paragraphs out of it, like in your other
703:
There are certain expectations regarding appearance, and I'm not certain we can say that a ref column constitutes "suitable use" of colors per
Criterion 5a. It's somewhat subjective, but I don't recall seeing this in an FL before, and I don't think the look is that attractive. If I had noticed this
512:
The writing in the new areas is questionable. I wouldn't consider "Also, at the time there were few categories, this one, the top actor, and the top actress etc." to be FL-caliber prose, and "It is was given to thirtheen diffrent programs" has more glitches than usable writing, even though the idea
181:
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the every single criteria. Also, I believe it to be well sourced and clear. After much tweaking and further adjustments I feel that it is worthy of being a
Featured List. I believe this list is worthy, considering I worked on it
411:
Why is the lead so short? It's half (or less) the size of the other lists in this series. Given that this award appears to be the soap opera equivalent of the Best
Picture Academy Award, I'd be very surprised if there isn't something more that can be said about it. Items like the first winner and
897:
Tell me more in the lead about this specific award. Can you come up with any other superlatives or trends? For the top daytime award I'm sure there's some other interesting info. The program history, origin of the Emmy name, and details about the statuette seem irrelevant here (everything after
942:
Sorry for the delay, I've been on vacation. You have a stats table for total awards won, how about one for nominations? What is the streak for most wins/nominations in a row for a show? What networks have been the most successful? Do the winners of this often coincide with the
Writing
119:
917:
are very popular. If you do not believe me, search it yourself. Trust me, you won't. Furthermore, the program history, origin of the Emmy name are absoutlety needed. Maybe, the statuette isn't but that all the information I could of come up with.
191:
195:
736:
I still do not see the problem. However, if we are going to resolved this, pleas tell me how to remove the colour since I have no idea how to do it? Plus, the are plenty of FLs that uses colours, for his example ,
183:
90:
85:
187:
94:
199:
777:
I absolutely despise this look, but since it's in other lists by authors I greatly respect, I don't see much choice but to strike this one. This is still not something I want to see become a trend at FLC.
77:
1019:
I see no clear problems in the list. The only thing I noticed was the issue with the colors in the ref column, but it has been already discussed and accepted, so I will accept it as well.
135:
81:
658:
IMO, I do not see the problem. Is this a criteria from a FL? I do not recall this being one. This issue was not brought up in the previous FLs. Thanks for the comments! —
425:. The reason is that I do not have that many facts is that the Academy Awards are way more popular than the Daytime Emmys. This is all the informations I can recall. —
1050:
1028:
1010:
992:
949:
933:
888:
847:
791:
768:
717:
693:
673:
646:
609:
560:
526:
503:
459:
440:
398:
373:
349:
328:
304:
282:
265:
217:
173:
56:
73:
66:
738:
742:
140:
40:
856:"et cetera" or "etc.", not "etcetera". Best avoided in formal writing though, if you can rephrase the sentence (or remove it, per next point).
750:
746:
30:
17:
1044:
986:
927:
882:
841:
762:
667:
640:
603:
554:
497:
434:
367:
322:
259:
211:
167:
1001:
Table looks good, though I think the article could use more prose information. How about some statistics about the nominees?
300:
278:
617:"where this award was renamed Outstanding Drama Series and it is given in honor of a daytime drama." Remove "it is"?
704:
in a previous FLC of yours, I'd have pointed it out there, but now is as good a time as any to make improvements.
1024:
296:
274:
345:
580:"held in 1972 when the award was orginnally called...". Spot the typo? Two supporters obviously didn't.
785:
711:
687:
520:
453:
392:
1040:
982:
923:
878:
837:
758:
663:
636:
599:
550:
493:
430:
363:
318:
255:
207:
163:
1020:
341:
779:
705:
681:
514:
447:
386:
53:
1036:
978:
919:
874:
833:
754:
659:
632:
595:
546:
489:
426:
359:
314:
251:
203:
159:
1005:
944:
905:
I can not come up with any other informations/facts since like I said previously the
202:
in mind. If you oppose, please address your issues here so they can be resolved. —
446:
lists. Whatever tricks you used to stretch those lists out would be helpful here.
111:
120:
Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for
Outstanding Drama Series/archive1
412:
number of shows to win the award seem like easy additions, for example.
192:
Daytime Emmy Award for
Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series
196:
Daytime Emmy Award for
Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series
488:. I have expanded the lead as much I can. It was not esay to do. —
184:
Daytime Emmy Award for
Outstanding Younger Actress in a Drama Series
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
753:
and my my FLs. IMO, this is ridiculous and should be resolved. —
188:
Daytime Emmy Award for
Outstanding Younger Actor in a Drama Series
200:
Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series
1035:
Thanks. I am going to fix the ref column problem very soon. —
960:
The final sentence of the lead runs on and ought to be split.
145:
107:
103:
99:
59:
1056:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
74:Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series
67:Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
1062:No further edits should be made to this page.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
237:"for a prior of two years." sounds awkward.
380:
340:Meets the criteria, and I see no problems.
221:
124:
909:Emmy Awards are very low profile but the
654:The Ref column shouldn't have any colors.
226:Resolved comments from Underneath-it-All
383:
224:
127:
117:
41:Knowledge talk:Featured list candidates
815:Three hyphens in a row is not a dash.
7:
545:. I have removed both sentences. —
24:
18:Knowledge:Featured list candidates
1045:
987:
968:
928:
883:
864:
842:
823:
763:
668:
641:
622:
604:
585:
555:
536:
498:
479:
435:
416:
368:
323:
260:
241:
212:
168:
1051:22:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
1029:21:05, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
950:04:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
399:21:04, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
234:The refs and tables look good!
57:10:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
1:
1011:11:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
993:19:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
934:19:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
889:19:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
848:19:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
792:23:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
769:01:56, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
718:23:12, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
694:21:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
674:22:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
647:22:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
610:22:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
561:23:29, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
527:23:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
504:02:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
460:23:12, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
441:22:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
374:20:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
350:20:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
329:13:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
305:12:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
283:01:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
266:01:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
218:12:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
174:12:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1079:
182:with the Featured lists,
1059:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
31:featured list nomination
385:Resolved comments from
358:Thank you so much! —
809:
808:
297:Underneath-it-All
289:
288:
275:Underneath-it-All
177:
153:
152:
1070:
1061:
1047:
1008:
989:
976:
972:
971:
947:
930:
885:
872:
868:
867:
844:
831:
827:
826:
788:
782:
765:
714:
708:
690:
684:
670:
643:
630:
626:
625:
606:
593:
589:
588:
557:
544:
540:
539:
523:
517:
500:
487:
483:
482:
456:
450:
437:
424:
420:
419:
395:
389:
384:
381:
370:
325:
262:
249:
245:
244:
225:
222:
214:
170:
158:Nominator(s): —
156:
125:
115:
97:
38:
1078:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1057:
1006:
969:
967:
945:
865:
863:
824:
822:
786:
780:
712:
706:
688:
682:
623:
621:
586:
584:
537:
535:
521:
515:
480:
478:
454:
448:
417:
415:
393:
387:
242:
240:
88:
72:
70:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1076:
1074:
1065:
1064:
1053:
1032:
1031:
1003:
1002:
998:
997:
996:
995:
962:
961:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
937:
936:
900:
899:
894:
893:
892:
891:
858:
857:
853:
852:
851:
850:
817:
816:
811:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
772:
771:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
679:
678:
677:
676:
651:
650:
649:
614:
613:
612:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
530:
529:
507:
506:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
402:
401:
379:
378:
377:
376:
353:
352:
334:
333:
332:
331:
308:
307:
287:
286:
271:
270:
269:
268:
235:
228:
227:
179:
178:
151:
150:
149:
148:
146:External links
143:
138:
130:
129:
123:
122:
69:
64:
63:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1075:
1063:
1060:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1009:
1000:
999:
994:
990:
984:
980:
975:
966:
965:
964:
963:
959:
958:
951:
948:
941:
940:
939:
938:
935:
931:
925:
921:
916:
912:
908:
904:
903:
902:
901:
896:
895:
890:
886:
880:
876:
871:
862:
861:
860:
859:
855:
854:
849:
845:
839:
835:
830:
821:
820:
819:
818:
814:
813:
812:
793:
789:
783:
776:
775:
774:
773:
770:
766:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
719:
715:
709:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
691:
685:
675:
671:
665:
661:
657:
656:
655:
652:
648:
644:
638:
634:
629:
620:
619:
618:
615:
611:
607:
601:
597:
592:
583:
582:
581:
578:
577:
562:
558:
552:
548:
543:
534:
533:
532:
531:
528:
524:
518:
511:
510:
509:
508:
505:
501:
495:
491:
486:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
461:
457:
451:
444:
443:
442:
438:
432:
428:
423:
414:
413:
410:
409:
407:
404:
403:
400:
396:
390:
382:
375:
371:
365:
361:
357:
356:
355:
354:
351:
347:
343:
339:
336:
335:
330:
326:
320:
316:
312:
311:
310:
309:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
290:
285:
284:
280:
276:
267:
263:
257:
253:
248:
239:
238:
236:
233:
232:
230:
229:
223:
220:
219:
215:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
176:
175:
171:
165:
161:
155:
154:
147:
144:
142:
139:
137:
134:
133:
132:
131:
126:
121:
118:
116:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
68:
65:
62:
60:
58:
55:
51:
48:The list was
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1058:
1055:
1021:Cambalachero
1016:
1004:
973:
914:
910:
906:
869:
828:
810:
680:
653:
627:
616:
590:
579:
541:
484:
421:
405:
337:
292:
272:
246:
180:
157:
141:Citation bot
71:
49:
47:
35:
28:
342:Caringtype1
313:Thanks! —
231:;Comments:
781:Giants2008
707:Giants2008
683:Giants2008
516:Giants2008
449:Giants2008
388:Giants2008
54:Giants2008
1037:SoapFan12
979:SoapFan12
920:SoapFan12
911:Primetime
875:SoapFan12
834:SoapFan12
755:SoapFan12
660:SoapFan12
633:SoapFan12
596:SoapFan12
547:SoapFan12
513:is good.
490:SoapFan12
427:SoapFan12
360:SoapFan12
315:SoapFan12
252:SoapFan12
204:SoapFan12
160:SoapFan12
1046:contribs
1007:Reywas92
988:contribs
946:Reywas92
929:contribs
898:"Also").
884:contribs
843:contribs
764:contribs
669:contribs
642:contribs
605:contribs
556:contribs
499:contribs
436:contribs
406:Comments
369:contribs
324:contribs
261:contribs
213:contribs
169:contribs
136:Analysis
50:promoted
1017:Support
907:Daytime
338:Support
293:Support
128:Toolbox
91:protect
86:history
915:Oscars
95:delete
977:. —
873:. —
832:. —
631:. —
594:. —
250:. —
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
1041:talk
1025:talk
983:talk
974:Done
924:talk
913:and
879:talk
870:Done
838:talk
829:Done
787:Talk
759:talk
751:this
749:and
747:this
743:this
739:this
713:Talk
689:Talk
664:talk
637:talk
628:Done
600:talk
591:Done
551:talk
542:Done
522:Talk
494:talk
485:Done
455:Talk
431:talk
422:Done
394:Talk
364:talk
346:talk
319:talk
301:talk
279:talk
256:talk
247:Done
208:talk
164:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
1043:,
985:,
926:,
918:—
881:,
840:,
761:,
666:,
639:,
602:,
553:,
496:,
433:,
366:,
321:,
258:,
210:,
194:,
166:,
52:by
1049:)
1027:)
991:)
932:)
887:)
846:)
790:)
767:)
745:,
741:,
716:)
692:)
672:)
645:)
608:)
559:)
525:)
502:)
458:)
439:)
408:–
397:)
372:)
348:)
327:)
303:)
295:–
281:)
273:–
264:)
216:)
198:,
190:,
186:,
172:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
61:.
33:.
1039:(
1023:(
981:(
922:(
877:(
836:(
784:(
757:(
710:(
686:(
662:(
635:(
598:(
549:(
519:(
492:(
452:(
429:(
391:(
362:(
344:(
317:(
299:(
277:(
254:(
206:(
162:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.