885:. It's a fine map, but not particularly striking or visually interesting. There are many maps on Knowledge (XXG) that are just as good or better. Also, it could be more useful. There's no distinctions between the areas claimed by Pakistan and those claimed by China. In fact, there is no indication of where China, Pakistan, and the other neighboring countries are. If you plan on using it for Indian cities articles, readers would want to know if a city is near the border with Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, etc. What about labeling the major cities, or at least the capital? For this map to be useful in any article, it would require major additions. As such it fails criterion #5. --
315:- I'd love to support this as I agree strongly about the importance of NPOV mapping on Knowledge (XXG). At the moment, though, the colours of the disputed regions are far too similar - on this LCD panel (at uni) you can't distinguish between them at all. Also, you mention that the map is compiled from 4 sources - what is the copyright status of these sources and what effect does that have on the resulting status of a compilation map? I'll definitely support if these issues are addressed. --
41:
919:
183:
1096:. I'm not suggesting that the notification was intended to have any improper effect, and of course new voters are always welcome but I believe that the fact that it has been posted to so many interested talk pages has (unintentionally) caused vote stacking, and that the vote count should be disregarded in closing ~
1354:
While I did factor in the vote (74% in favor), due to
Veledan's concerns of (unintentional) vote stacking I also considered the arguments of those in favor of promotion and against. "It's just a map" is not really a legitimate objection, nor one which can be addressed; another "oppose" vote was too
215:
Umm.... I've used transparencies rather than a different colour to depict the two disputed regions. I wanted the colours to blend from yellow to orange to show the differences. Since the gradient from yellow to orange is not much, it does not contrast too much. To mitigate this problem somewhat I'd
1109:
Yes, I admit being guilty of the aforesaid charge. I wanted it to be reviewed by all concerned parties concerned, not just WP:FPC. However I would like to honestly add that I did not clamour for support votes, people could have also opposed the candidature. I didn't want a scenario to occur later
978:
The lack of attractiveness concerns me a little. IMO, even images used for informative purposes still need to catch the eye. There a few scientific tables which have good colour combinations and look good. The thing is that when (if) it will we on the main page, it will seem strange. However, I'm
836:
I'm not sure on the exact figure. It took me six days (I do it on weekends and started on 16th April). Rough figure: ~10-12 hrs. I'm not a professional, and I taught myself to draw maps over the past few months. I'd also like to add that shading in SVG maps is kinda' difficult and had to use many
1152:. The legend is confusing, as are parts of the border regions. The legend lists two different dash-dot lines (of different thickness), and I can't tell which parts are one and which are the other. And the solid line around most of the country does not appear in the legend; what does it mean?--
362:
I haven't tried this, so just a suggestion, but could you simply make the orange colour a bit darker, and the yellow perhaps slightly lighter, so as to widen the gradient? At the moment the orange particularly seems fairly pale, although I agree about not making it too 'flashy' :)
1131:
It'll be every bit as useful as you say and I applaud you for the excellent job you've done, but I just don't think a blank locator map is the best way to represent any country's topology for FP. To fulfil criterion #7 an FP should be a good representation of the subject
741:
map is useful for the article. Now, a filled-in one might be, but that's not what's being voted on at the moment. I'd have to see a filled-in one to decide if I'd support that one. At an absolute minimum, the legend needs to be on the map, not on the description page.
327:
Image copyrights: Three of the four sources are PD, the fourth is copyrighted. According to international copyright laws, geographical and political boundaries cannot be copyrighted for obvious reasons. What is copyrighted are the style and creativity. See
894:
I could spice up the map as per your suggestions, but this is meant to be a locator map and having the detail you mentioned would be an overkill. As I said, this is the recommended format, else I could spice it up like my other featured map:
457:- although I do have a small comment :) I personally think the un-disputed international border would look better if it was a dark black line without dashes. Also there is gap in the border between Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan.
1136:— a featured country map ought to show features of interest such as places, or perhaps interesting geographic details. This will be a good locator map, but promoting what is basically a blank template seems a bit bizarre to me ~
206:- the four colours are very similar, and it's particularly hard to see the difference between the first pair (India, disputed area 1) and to a lesser extent, the second pair (disputed areas 1 and 2). Consider changing them?
1217:. Nice work. Yet, a FP needs to be something special, either by being very descriptive or by being an eye-catching illustration. This one is neither. In addition to that, I also agree with the comment made by Veledan.
1359:
criteria #5 and #7. I find its usefulness (#5) as a locator map difficult to dispute. And since the subject of this image is India's profile and regional divisions, not India itself, I don't see that it fails #7.
34:
676:
Unfortunately yes, I agree with you. :( I would like to try enhance it while keeping it within the ambit of recommendations made by the Maps wikiproject. Please feel free to make any suggestions. Regards,
877:
1068:
and I urge the closer to take this into account. I count nine support votes from usernames I don't recognize as having voted on FPCs before, and I see that notification of this FPC was given at
1077:
827:
I'm with
Nichalp. FPC is first and foremost meant to encourage people to spend time and effort making pictures for Knowledge (XXG). Out of interest, how many hours did it take you to make?
811:
No problems. I agree with you. As I've said, I nominated it for its utility value, not looks as it's to be a locator map. I could have jazzed it up, but decided to keep it simple. Regards,
324:
Colours: I'm not sure what to do about the colours. (See my reply to
Steveage). I'm trying to think of something that is not to flashy and has a wider gradient. Do you have any suggestions?
1363:
Ultimately, I'm not convinced that this image falls far short of any of the criteria, if it falls short at all. So, with a significant majority of voters in favor, I'm promoting it. --
1081:
65:
Kashmir: Pakistan-administered (Indian-claimed), Indian-administered (Pakistan claimed), Chinese-administered (Indian-claimed), area ceded to China by
Pakistan (Indian claimed).
1089:
1085:
802:, I'm sure you spent alot of time working on it and I commend you for that. But It's just a blank map. I like looking at a featured picture thats vivid or exciting. --
759:. This map will be the base map for all Indian cities, and the location will be superimposed over it. The map will thus be used across a thousand articles. Regards,
1242:
What about the islands of New Moore/South
Talpatty/Purbasha? - IMHO there is a dispute with Bangladesh about them. I see no indication in the map about it. (see
946:
even though it may be a good map and somewhat useful. I think as an image it is too sparse (especially in the upper part) and not at all visually interesting.
527:- I have a minor issue. In its highest resolution, I could see a black mark (shape of 'U') in the space between Sri Lanka and Tamil Nadu. Can that be fixed? -
755:
Thanks for elaborating. :) We plan to use the map as a locator map for towns and cities in India. We'll be modelling the location based on the work done on
1385:
88:
Note: I've compiled the map from 4 sources. I believe that the map will go a long way as a base for the long standing demand for NPOV India maps. Regards,
296:. Minor issue being that similar colour need to be fixed for clarity in first glance. Map featurable as highly functional and trend-setter in NPOV maps. -
128:
Comment. Would you mind putting a list of what the various colored areas mean on the image page? It will make it easier for future reference. Cheers! --
714:
1307:
Excellent work. Perhaps a sentence should be added to the associated details stating something along the lines of "Boundaries correct as of 2006"?
17:
1093:
1162:
756:
1073:
49:
1371:
1341:
1327:
1311:
1299:
1281:
1250:
1237:
1221:
1209:
1197:
1176:
1156:
1144:
1121:
1104:
1057:
1045:
1024:
1006:
989:
950:
938:
910:
889:
866:
848:
831:
822:
806:
786:
770:
750:
732:
708:
688:
671:
644:
632:
595:
575:
558:
542:
519:
501:
485:
469:
437:
421:
393:
367:
351:
319:
305:
288:
268:
252:
243:
227:
210:
198:
167:
153:
137:
123:
99:
1064:
23:
666:
48:
This is an unusal nomination. I'm not nominating it for looks but rather functionality. The colours are standardised as per
1014:
Per nom/above. After thinking about it, I realised that it still is beautiful for what the image represents, a blank map!
1226:
Would the fact that this is the *only* NPOV map available on the internet also qualify for this special status? Regards,
718:
329:
62:
Most comprehensive NPOV map available on the internet. Shows the following disputed areas by way of shading and borders:
1243:
1258:, Talpatty island is a riverine island. These islands would be too tiny to depict on this map. The same applies to
783:
747:
705:
187:
717:
it conforms to points #1-#6. I can't do anything about #7 since I've modelled it on recommendations made by
656:
176:
517:
301:
1355:
vague to be addressed; and the concerns of two other "oppose" votes were addressed. Others opposed cited
1186:-- I've changed the name of this nomination to Blank locator map of India to reflect its intended usage.
611:
1368:
572:
333:
1069:
1041:
779:
743:
701:
589:
133:
1256:
874:
626:
418:
364:
316:
1356:
1322:
1308:
1276:
1232:
1192:
1171:
1141:
1116:
1101:
1021:
1001:
986:
965:
905:
843:
828:
817:
765:
727:
683:
553:
535:
514:
496:
480:
432:
388:
346:
297:
285:
263:
249:
238:
222:
207:
148:
118:
94:
68:
1364:
569:
417:
edited version - much clearer. Thanks for clearing up my concerns about copyright, too :) --
75:
1267:
1037:
947:
896:
863:
586:
129:
40:
641:
466:
56:
Highest resolution image available, (drawn to scale) on the internet: (1486x1734 px) +
182:
1379:
1206:
1153:
886:
661:
653:
618:
606:
1317:
1271:
1227:
1187:
1166:
1137:
1111:
1097:
1015:
996:
980:
960:
930:
900:
838:
812:
760:
722:
678:
548:
528:
491:
475:
427:
383:
341:
258:
233:
217:
143:
113:
89:
918:
1270:) is almost invisible at lower resolutions because of small area of the islands.
1296:
1263:
1054:
164:
1247:
1218:
995:
I really don't intend or even expect to have it featured on the main page. :)
926:
803:
79:
1338:
1259:
458:
737:
Sorry, let me be clear. I don't think it fulfills #5. I don't see how the
74:
Additional
Western sector claims/administration by China in the states of
284:
with new colours - great map, perfectly appropriate for featured image.
933:
1262:
and the Indian and
Bangladeshi exclaves. For example, the islands of
1063:
Comment: I believe this FPC nomination has been unduly influenced by
216:
used different border styles. Awaiting further suggestions. Regards,
192:
1161:
I've fixed the border in the legend. I've replied to your comments
175:
It's very well done. Agree entirely on principle raised by nom --
82:. No India map on the internet has such a level of detail covered.
39:
338:
Maps and diagrams can often be redrawn from original sources...
57:
24:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates/Blank map of India
1078:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Notice board for
Pakistan-related topics
52:, so I can't change that. My reasons for nominating are for:
721:. #8 does not really apply here. Hope this helps. Regards,
1082:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Notice board for India-related topics
568:. Definitely an example of Knowledge (XXG)'s best work.
474:
I'll be fixing the gap and acceding to your suggestion.
1090:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:China-related topics notice board
1086:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:China-related topics notice board
382:
I've tried to modify the colours. Please take a look.
232:
I've tried to modify the colours. Please take a look.
700:. Sorry, but I don't see how this is FP material. --
330:
Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy#User-created images
490:Gap fixed and international border made standard.
248:Much better! Does the legend still need updating?
1110:saying "how could this POV map be featured!?"
862:. Entirely endorse points made by Nichalp. --
8:
959:, and if I can take care of your objection?
163:. I completely agree with the nominator. --
979:confident Nichalp can improve the colours.
715:Knowledge (XXG):What is a featured picture?
640:. Entirely endorse points made by Nichalp.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
1349:Promoted Image:India-locator-map-blank.svg
71:: Claimed by China, administered by India
1053:, gotta give props to well-made maps. --
1094:Portal talk:People's Republic of China
257:Nope, I'd already updated the legend.
1074:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Maps
7:
757:Template talk:Infobox protected area
1255:Hi! Thanks for your feedback. From
1065:Knowledge (XXG):Survey notification
1386:Ended featured picture nominations
31:
583:. High res, NPOV (!). Nice pic.--
917:
837:layers to get the final output.
719:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Maps
181:
50:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Maps
955:Could you elaborate on what is
334:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use#Policy
1:
35:Blank (locator) map of India
1244:List_of_territorial_disputes
585:May the Force be with you!
1402:
652:not exactly striking... --
591:($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|)
462:
1372:17:18, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
1342:22:13, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
1337:- agree with Veledan. --
1328:15:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
1312:17:35, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
1300:02:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
1282:14:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
1251:14:04, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
1238:13:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
1222:12:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
1210:05:07, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
1198:03:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
1177:06:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
1157:20:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
1145:20:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
1122:12:57, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
1105:21:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
1058:15:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
1046:09:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
1025:11:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
1007:09:24, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
990:09:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
951:22:03, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
939:11:35, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
911:08:46, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
890:22:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
878:16:37, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
867:11:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
849:08:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
832:08:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
823:05:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
807:03:14, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
778:. Eh, fair enough. :) --
269:06:34, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
1316:Thanks! I've added it.
787:18:40, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
771:17:49, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
751:17:28, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
733:15:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
709:15:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
689:11:12, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
672:03:12, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
645:20:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
633:16:46, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
596:16:24, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
576:15:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
559:06:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
543:15:42, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
520:15:24, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
502:06:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
486:15:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
470:12:28, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
438:11:12, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
422:11:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
394:06:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
368:16:06, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
352:11:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
320:11:28, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
306:09:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
289:15:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
253:15:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
244:06:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
228:09:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
211:09:24, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
199:08:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
168:08:48, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
154:07:28, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
138:06:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
124:06:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
100:06:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
45:
43:
1070:Portal talk:Pakistan
925:Strongly agree with
1205:per nom and fixes.
976:Conditional support
46:
44:Blank map of India
936:
630:
312:Reluctant neutral
69:Arunachal Pradesh
22:(Redirected from
1393:
1325:
1320:
1279:
1274:
1235:
1230:
1195:
1190:
1174:
1169:
1119:
1114:
1004:
999:
968:
963:
934:
921:
908:
903:
897:image:Goamap.png
846:
841:
820:
815:
768:
763:
730:
725:
686:
681:
669:
659:
631:
624:
621:
616:
609:
594:
592:
556:
551:
541:
538:
531:
499:
494:
483:
478:
464:
435:
430:
391:
386:
349:
344:
266:
261:
241:
236:
225:
220:
197:
195:
190:
185:
179:
151:
146:
121:
116:
97:
92:
76:Himachal Pradesh
27:
1401:
1400:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1376:
1375:
1323:
1318:
1277:
1272:
1268:union territory
1233:
1228:
1193:
1188:
1172:
1167:
1117:
1112:
1002:
997:
966:
961:
906:
901:
844:
839:
818:
813:
780:Dante Alighieri
766:
761:
744:Dante Alighieri
728:
723:
702:Dante Alighieri
684:
679:
670:
665:
657:
619:
612:
607:
604:
590:
584:
554:
549:
536:
533:
529:
497:
492:
481:
476:
433:
428:
389:
384:
347:
342:
313:
264:
259:
239:
234:
223:
218:
193:
188:
186:
177:
149:
144:
119:
114:
95:
90:
38:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1399:
1397:
1389:
1388:
1378:
1377:
1347:
1345:
1344:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1302:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1212:
1200:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1147:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1060:
1048:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
972:
971:
970:
941:
915:
914:
913:
880:
869:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
693:
692:
691:
664:
647:
635:
598:
578:
563:
562:
561:
522:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
373:
372:
371:
370:
357:
356:
355:
354:
325:
311:
308:
291:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
201:
170:
158:
157:
156:
126:
104:
86:
85:
84:
83:
72:
66:
60:
37:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1398:
1387:
1384:
1383:
1381:
1374:
1373:
1370:
1366:
1361:
1358:
1353:
1350:
1343:
1340:
1336:
1333:
1329:
1326:
1321:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1310:
1306:
1303:
1301:
1298:
1294:
1291:
1283:
1280:
1275:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1231:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1220:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1208:
1204:
1201:
1199:
1196:
1191:
1185:
1182:
1178:
1175:
1170:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1155:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1130:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1115:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1032:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1019:
1018:
1013:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1005:
1000:
994:
993:
992:
991:
988:
987:
984:
983:
977:
973:
969:
964:
958:
954:
953:
952:
949:
945:
942:
940:
937:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
909:
904:
898:
893:
892:
891:
888:
884:
881:
879:
876:
873:
870:
868:
865:
861:
858:
850:
847:
842:
835:
834:
833:
830:
826:
825:
824:
821:
816:
810:
809:
808:
805:
801:
800:Strong Oppose
798:
788:
785:
781:
777:
774:
773:
772:
769:
764:
758:
754:
753:
752:
749:
745:
740:
736:
735:
734:
731:
726:
720:
716:
712:
711:
710:
707:
703:
699:
698:
694:
690:
687:
682:
675:
674:
673:
668:
663:
660:
655:
651:
648:
646:
643:
639:
636:
634:
628:
623:
622:
617:
615:
610:
602:
599:
597:
593:
588:
582:
579:
577:
574:
571:
567:
564:
560:
557:
552:
546:
545:
544:
539:
532:
526:
523:
521:
518:
516:
512:
509:
503:
500:
495:
489:
488:
487:
484:
479:
473:
472:
471:
468:
460:
456:
453:
452:
439:
436:
431:
425:
424:
423:
420:
419:Yummifruitbat
416:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
395:
392:
387:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
369:
366:
365:Yummifruitbat
361:
360:
359:
358:
353:
350:
345:
339:
335:
331:
326:
323:
322:
321:
318:
317:Yummifruitbat
314:
309:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
290:
287:
283:
280:
270:
267:
262:
256:
255:
254:
251:
247:
246:
245:
242:
237:
231:
230:
229:
226:
221:
214:
213:
212:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
191:
184:
180:
174:
171:
169:
166:
162:
159:
155:
152:
147:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
127:
125:
122:
117:
111:
108:Nominate and
107:
106:
105:
102:
101:
98:
93:
81:
77:
73:
70:
67:
64:
63:
61:
59:
55:
54:
53:
51:
42:
36:
33:
25:
19:
1362:
1351:
1348:
1346:
1334:
1309:CheekyMonkey
1304:
1292:
1214:
1202:
1183:
1149:
1133:
1128:
1062:
1050:
1036:. Per nom.--
1033:
1020:
1016:
1011:
985:
981:
975:
974:
956:
943:
922:
882:
875:Rama's Arrow
871:
859:
799:
775:
738:
696:
695:
650:Weak Support
649:
637:
613:
605:
600:
580:
565:
524:
515:thunderboltz
513:per nom. --
510:
454:
426:No probs :)
414:
337:
310:
298:Ambuj Saxena
293:
281:
203:
172:
160:
109:
103:
87:
47:
1365:bcasterline
1295:per nom. –
1264:Lakshadweep
1165:. Regards,
899:. Regards,
570:bcasterline
340:) Regards,
189:(the scope)
1352:(+23 / -8)
948:Bonus Onus
864:Gurubrahma
587:Shreshth91
130:PS2pcGAMER
80:Uttranchal
1260:Sir Creek
1134:in itself
1038:Dwaipayan
654:Lewk_of_S
642:ImpuMozhi
547:Removed.
1380:Category
1357:WP:WIAFP
1319:=Nichalp
1273:=Nichalp
1229:=Nichalp
1207:Saravask
1189:=Nichalp
1168:=Nichalp
1154:ragesoss
1113:=Nichalp
998:=Nichalp
962:=Nichalp
902:=Nichalp
840:=Nichalp
814:=Nichalp
762:=Nichalp
724:=Nichalp
680:=Nichalp
550:=Nichalp
493:=Nichalp
477:=Nichalp
429:=Nichalp
385:=Nichalp
343:=Nichalp
260:=Nichalp
235:=Nichalp
219:=Nichalp
145:=Nichalp
115:=Nichalp
91:=Nichalp
1324:«Talk»=
1305:Support
1293:Support
1278:«Talk»=
1234:«Talk»=
1203:Support
1194:«Talk»=
1184:Comment
1173:«Talk»=
1138:Veledan
1118:«Talk»=
1098:Veledan
1051:Support
1034:Support
1012:Support
1003:«Talk»=
967:«Talk»=
931:Fir0002
907:«Talk»=
872:Support
860:Support
845:«Talk»=
829:Stevage
819:«Talk»=
776:Support
767:«Talk»=
729:«Talk»=
685:«Talk»=
667:contrib
638:Support
601:Support
581:Support
566:Support
555:«Talk»=
530:Ganeshk
525:Support
511:Support
498:«Talk»=
482:«Talk»=
455:Support
434:«Talk»=
415:Support
390:«Talk»=
348:«Talk»=
294:Support
286:Stevage
282:Support
265:«Talk»=
250:Stevage
240:«Talk»=
224:«Talk»=
208:Stevage
204:Comment
173:Support
161:Support
150:«Talk»=
120:«Talk»=
110:support
96:«Talk»=
1335:Oppose
1297:ugen64
1215:Oppose
1150:Oppose
1129:Oppose
1092:, and
1055:Golbez
957:sparse
944:Oppose
923:Oppose
883:Oppose
697:Oppose
165:Sundar
142:Done!
1248:Mikeo
1219:Mikeo
1017:Gizza
982:Gizza
927:BWF89
804:BWF89
739:blank
713:From
662:rthic
608:howch
178:Samir
16:<
1369:talk
1339:P199
1163:here
1142:Talk
1102:Talk
1042:talk
784:Talk
748:Talk
706:Talk
627:chat
537:talk
467:Talk
459:Sukh
336:(#1
332:and
302:talk
194:धर्म
134:talk
112:. -
78:and
1266:(a
935:www
463:ਸੁਖ
58:SVG
1382::
1367:•
1246:)
1140:•
1100:•
1088:,
1084:,
1080:,
1076:,
1072:,
1044:)
929:--
887:dm
782:|
746:|
742:--
704:|
620:ng
603:.
465:|
461:|
363:--
304:)
136:)
1040:(
658:e
629:}
625:{
614:e
573:t
540:)
534:(
300:(
132:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
