309:
All information on this site is public domain and may be distributed or copied unless otherwise specified. Use of appropriate byline/photo/image credits is requested. Unauthorized attempts to upload information or change information on this website are strictly prohibited and may be punishable under
54:
49:
55:
50:
48:
47:
53:
52:
51:
337:
So what does that mean? I was under the assumption that the current copyright information listed for the image was correct. It's clearly the Navy band. No obvious signs that this is excluded from the Public Domain. Is this still an issue or not?
99:
71:
I am nominating this file because the sound quality is clear and crisp, the band as a whole is in time, no one section stands out which is good and because overall this is a fantastic file that really does add to the article.
146:, the sound description page needs to give the composer and date of composition; if the date of recording and the name of the conductor are available, those ought to be added too. If this is added, I will support promotion.
46:
37:
262:
188:
154:
129:
179:
But there is absolutely nothing wrong with individual sections "standing out." That is often the composer's intent. Has the nominator ever composed, directed, or performed a work for band?
196:
I understand that, what I meant was one section is not the ONLY thing you hear, in every piece there needs to be balance and I have been participating in band for 6 years now. —
45:
442:
386:
362:
331:
291:
213:
167:
459:
17:
120:
403:
232:
301:
My guess is as good as
Bencherlite's, it says performed by the Ceremonial Band. Also re copyright this is from their
407:
236:
225:
How do we know the recording is the work of the U.S. Government? The links provided do not indicate the source.
91:
433:
353:
282:
258:
163:
150:
115:
310:
the
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 and the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act.
419:
339:
268:
83:
400:
246:
says "National
Anthems and Ceremonial Music performed by the Ceremonial Band", which links to
229:
62:
255:
251:
184:
160:
147:
267:
Based on what I see, the legal status of this submission is not or is no longer an issue.
110:
369:
Appropriate byline is used in the file description I believe and no, it's not an issue. —
143:
453:
378:
323:
205:
397:
226:
254:
where the file comes from. The nominator may be able to help further, I suppose.
247:
44:
372:
317:
302:
199:
180:
243:
416:
Promoted United States Navy Band - Inno e Marcia
Pontificale.ogg
38:
28:
303:http://www.navyband.navy.mil/Disclaimer.shtml
8:
396:It appears to meet all of the requirements.
61:The United States Navy Band performing the
7:
460:Knowledge featured sound nominations
18:Knowledge:Featured sound candidates
24:
42:
1:
387:02:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
363:02:10, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
332:02:29, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
292:21:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
263:08:09, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
214:02:29, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
189:00:36, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
168:08:09, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
155:13:53, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
159:I have added these details.
130:22:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
100:09:43, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
443:01:17, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
476:
312:
307:
244:The band's home page
107:per the nomination.
406:2010-12-30T02:41Z (
235:2010-12-24T22:17Z (
374:Ancient Apparition
319:Ancient Apparition
201:Ancient Apparition
440:
360:
289:
63:Pontifical Anthem
56:
467:
439:
434:
431:
385:
381:
375:
359:
354:
351:
330:
326:
320:
288:
283:
280:
212:
208:
202:
128:
125:
118:
113:
97:
94:
88:
86:
58:
57:
475:
474:
470:
469:
468:
466:
465:
464:
450:
449:
435:
428:
424:
420:
379:
373:
370:
355:
348:
344:
340:
324:
318:
315:
284:
277:
273:
269:
206:
200:
197:
124:
121:
116:
111:
108:
92:
90:
84:
82:
69:
68:
67:
66:
65:
59:
43:
40:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
473:
471:
463:
462:
452:
451:
447:
426:
422:
414:
412:
411:
390:
389:
366:
365:
346:
342:
305:disclaimer]:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
275:
271:
219:
218:
217:
216:
173:
172:
171:
170:
133:
132:
122:
102:
60:
41:
36:
35:
34:
33:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
472:
461:
458:
457:
455:
448:
445:
444:
441:
438:
432:
430:
417:
409:
405:
402:
399:
395:
392:
391:
388:
384:
382:
376:
368:
367:
364:
361:
358:
352:
350:
336:
335:
334:
333:
329:
327:
321:
311:
306:
304:
293:
290:
287:
281:
279:
266:
265:
264:
261:
260:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
240:
238:
234:
231:
228:
224:
221:
220:
215:
211:
209:
203:
195:
192:
191:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
174:
169:
166:
165:
162:
158:
157:
156:
153:
152:
149:
145:
141:
139:
135:
134:
131:
127:
126:
119:
114:
106:
103:
101:
98:
95:
87:
79:
76:Nominate and
75:
74:
73:
64:
39:
29:
26:
19:
446:
436:
421:
415:
413:
393:
371:
356:
341:
316:
313:
308:
300:
285:
270:
259:
242:At a guess,
222:
198:
193:
176:
164:
151:
137:
136:
109:
104:
85:Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм
81:
77:
70:
27:
256:Bencherlite
161:Bencherlite
148:Bencherlite
142:Looking at
138:Conditional
383:• 1:20pm •
380:Champagne?
328:• 1:29pm •
325:Champagne?
210:• 1:29pm •
207:Champagne?
96:• 8:43pm •
93:Champagne?
454:Category
250:then to
223:Question
429:anguard
394:Support
349:anguard
278:anguard
194:Comment
177:Support
140:support
105:Support
78:support
181:Edison
144:WP:FS?
112:Imzadi
16:<
437:Wha?
425:ven
357:Wha?
345:ven
286:Wha?
274:ven
252:this
248:this
185:talk
117:1979
408:UTC
404:der
401:gin
237:UTC
233:der
230:gin
80:. —
456::
418:--
377:•
322:•
239:)
204:•
187:)
89:•
427:M
423:S
410:)
398:Z
347:M
343:S
314:—
276:M
272:S
227:Z
183:(
123:→
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.