Knowledge (XXG)

:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

395: 466: 605:
Considering the entire point of this task force is to improve and uphold the quality of Good articles, only experienced reviewers who are established (trusted) within the project should participate in this initial sweep. It is key that clearly substandard articles be removed from the GA list, while
635:
Quality is the goal here. For that reason, awards will be given out based on the quality of reviews, not solely on quantity. What awards will be given out will not all be known until the sweep is completed. Reviews should be done for the betterment of the project and the encyclopedia, not for a
559:
In the case of minor issues, or issues which can be easily addressed, try to fix as many problems as you can, list any remaining issues on the review subpage, then allow editors seven days to address them, as you would with "on hold" at GAN. Be sure to keep track of the article. You may find it
46: 646: 597: 497: 42: 346: 491: 504:
Start the review on the talk page of the article by adding {{subst:GAR}}. Save the page, and then follow the first bold link ("individual reassessment") to create the subpage for the review. Review the article against the
545:), the GAN nominator (check the article history), as well as any related WikiProjects. Give editors enough time to respond to the issues (usually a week), and if progress is being made, consider extending the deadline. 606:
those that are almost there are brought up to current GA standards. The point is to target articles that have "fallen through the cracks", so we can't have any fall through the cracks a second time during this sweep.
310: 362: 21: 326: 585:
Do your best, remain courteous with the articles' editors (they may have spent a lot of time working on the article and may not want to hear about changes you are recommending), and have fun reviewing!
385: 318: 49:
was kept, so if you are interested in bringing an article up to GA, this list may be helpful. Thank you to all reviewers who helped complete this monumental task of maintaining the integrity of GAs.
338: 322: 350: 334: 370: 314: 54: 330: 342: 617:
and all GA processes. We thank everyone for their interest, but only selected individuals will be invited to participate in the sweeps. Those who have participated can use
380: 374: 541:
to meet the criteria, list what issues need to be addressed on the subpage. Leave a message on the talk pages of the main contributors of the article (using
501:
page if has already been reviewed or is currently on hold (also view the article's talk page to see if it already has been delisted, has become an FA, etc.).
411: 74:. The aim of this project is to "sweep" through the current good articles to check that they meet the criteria. To participate, pick a sub-category at 357: 305: 98: 17: 129: 419: 117: 407: 666: 403: 273: 123: 41:
Sweeps was completed in March 2010, after initially beginning in August 2007. A list of all reviewed articles can be seen at the
415: 573:
whether the article meets the criteria, or you are not comfortable delisting it, nominate it for community review at
267: 104: 636:
star... But you'll still get a star (maybe something better) if you make a significant impact during the sweeps.
621: 553: 528: 57:
on GA Sweeps, explaining its origins, purpose, and achievements. There are no plans to repeat the process.
610: 561: 433: 201: 83: 79: 613:. Keep in mind that we're looking for those individuals that have a very strong understanding of 614: 506: 482: 71: 237: 82:
when reviews of the sub-category have been completed. Editor's contributions can be recorded
574: 514: 510: 195: 549: 75: 67: 165: 27: 660: 542: 465: 231: 78:
and review the articles; take appropriate action, as described below, and mark the
582:
If you have any questions about the process, leave a message on the talk page.
548:
In the case of a clear failure to meet the criteria, remove the article from
159: 70:
requires that all articles tagged and listed as Good articles meet the
464: 423: 609:
If you are interested in helping, please leave a message on
478: 448: 441: 296: 282: 260: 246: 224: 210: 188: 174: 152: 138: 552:
and leave a message on the review subpage, using {{
534:, add an entry and classify the action as GAR kept. 8: 556:}} with a detailed list of issues below it. 347:History of Poland during the Piast dynasty 18:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Good articles 88: 495:. Before reviewing double-check on the 469:Progress as of the end of February 2010 596:Participants list and progress found 93:WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks 7: 492:full list of articles left to review 381:WikiProject Good articles newsletter 102:identifies, organizes and improves 509:as you would an article listed at 35: 53:The Knowledge (XXG) Signpost has 481:need to be reviewed against the 393: 124:Frank Butler (American football) 36: 68:Knowledge (XXG)'s Good articles 1: 479:listed before 26 August 2007 644:Keep track of your reviews 683: 431: 311:Ottawa Senators (original) 22:Project quality task force 667:WikiProject Good articles 575:Good article reassessment 489:Choose articles from the 401: 91: 473:For this initial sweep, 268:Aérospatiale SA 330 Puma 611:OhanaUnited's talk page 327:Architecture of Denmark 470: 28:Knowledge (XXG):GAPQ/S 627:on their user pages. 615:good article criteria 468: 404:Good article criteria 554:subst:GASweepsDelist 339:Battle of the Yarmuk 323:River Don Navigation 351:Mary McLeod Bethune 108:on Knowledge (XXG). 45:. A list of all of 562:subst:GASweepsHold 471: 371:GAN Backlog Drives 319:Siege of Szigetvár 43:running total page 655: 654: 560:helpful to use {{ 430: 429: 335:Battle of Plataea 66:The integrity of 47:delisted articles 26:(Redirected from 674: 626: 620: 533: 527: 451: 444: 420:Nominations list 397: 396: 299: 292: 291: 290: 288: 287: 279: 278: 263: 256: 255: 254: 252: 251: 243: 242: 227: 220: 219: 218: 216: 215: 207: 206: 191: 184: 183: 182: 180: 179: 171: 170: 155: 148: 147: 146: 144: 143: 135: 134: 89: 37: 31: 682: 681: 677: 676: 675: 673: 672: 671: 657: 656: 642: 633: 624: 618: 592: 531: 525: 520:If the article 463: 455: 454: 447: 440: 436: 426: 394: 363:Project quality 315:British Airways 295: 285: 283: 276: 274: 271: 270: 266: 259: 249: 247: 240: 238: 235: 234: 230: 223: 213: 211: 204: 202: 199: 198: 196:Wuert Engelmann 194: 187: 177: 175: 168: 166: 163: 162: 158: 151: 141: 139: 132: 130: 127: 126: 122: 109: 64: 33: 32: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 680: 678: 670: 669: 659: 658: 653: 652: 641: 638: 632: 629: 622:User GA sweeps 603: 602: 591: 588: 587: 586: 583: 580: 579: 578: 567: 566: 565: 557: 537:If an article 535: 529:ArticleHistory 502: 477:Good articles 462: 459: 457: 453: 452: 445: 437: 432: 428: 427: 418: 402: 399: 398: 391: 390: 389: 384:(last updated 377: 354: 302: 111: 110: 96: 95: 63: 60: 34: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 679: 668: 665: 664: 662: 651: 649: 648: 640:Running total 639: 637: 630: 628: 623: 616: 612: 607: 601: 599: 594: 593: 590:Participation 589: 584: 581: 576: 572: 568: 563: 558: 555: 551: 547: 546: 544: 540: 536: 530: 523: 519: 518: 516: 512: 508: 503: 500: 499: 498:running total 494: 493: 488: 487: 486: 484: 480: 476: 467: 460: 458: 450: 446: 443: 439: 438: 435: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 400: 392: 387: 383: 382: 378: 376: 372: 368: 364: 361: 359: 355: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 331:Robbie Fowler 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 309: 307: 303: 300: 298: 289: 280: 269: 264: 262: 253: 244: 233: 228: 226: 217: 208: 197: 192: 190: 181: 172: 161: 156: 154: 145: 136: 125: 121: 119: 115: 114: 113: 112: 107: 106: 105:good articles 101: 100: 94: 90: 87: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 61: 59: 58: 56: 50: 48: 44: 39: 38: 29: 23: 19: 645: 643: 634: 608: 604: 595: 570: 538: 521: 496: 490: 474: 472: 456: 386:January 2013 379: 366: 356: 343:Key Biscayne 306:Reassessment 304: 297:start review 294: 261:start review 258: 232:Zud Schammel 225:start review 222: 189:start review 186: 153:start review 150: 116: 103: 99:This project 97: 92: 65: 52: 51: 40: 569:If you are 524:review, in 483:GA criteria 416:Changes log 358:Task forces 118:Nominations 80:sweeps list 517:and save. 412:GAN Report 408:Statistics 55:an article 543:this tool 449:WP:SWEEPS 442:WP:GAPQ/S 434:Shortcuts 160:Hal Hinte 661:Category 507:criteria 72:criteria 20:‎ | 461:Process 631:Awards 571:unsure 522:passes 515:WP:GAR 511:WP:GAN 375:GA Cup 367:Sweeps 286:istory 250:istory 214:istory 178:istory 142:istory 550:WP:GA 539:fails 265:) • 229:) • 193:) • 157:) • 76:WP:GA 62:Intro 16:< 647:here 598:here 424:edit 84:here 564:}}. 513:or 475:all 301:) 277:alk 241:alk 205:alk 169:alk 133:alk 86:. 663:: 650:. 625:}} 619:{{ 532:}} 526:{{ 485:. 422:| 414:| 406:| 388:) 373:• 369:• 365:• 353:• 349:• 345:• 341:• 337:• 333:• 329:• 325:• 321:• 317:• 313:• 293:| 281:| 257:| 245:| 221:| 209:| 185:| 173:| 149:| 137:| 600:. 577:. 410:| 360:: 308:: 284:h 275:t 272:( 248:h 239:t 236:( 212:h 203:t 200:( 176:h 167:t 164:( 140:h 131:t 128:( 120:: 30:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Good articles
Project quality task force
Knowledge (XXG):GAPQ/S
running total page
delisted articles
an article
Knowledge (XXG)'s Good articles
criteria
WP:GA
sweeps list
here
This project
good articles
Nominations
Frank Butler (American football)
talk
history
start review
Hal Hinte
talk
history
start review
Wuert Engelmann
talk
history
start review
Zud Schammel
talk
history
start review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.