553:, such as having an adequate lead, correct grammar, and reliable sourcing. When an editor reviews an article, they can either pass or fail the article. If the article doesn't meet the GA criteria, it is normal (but not required) to identify the problems and then postpone the decision by placing the article "on hold", to give editors a chance to fix the identified problems. If an article is failed immediately, one or more significant issues need to be addressed before the article can be renominated for the same reviewer/another reviewer to look over the article. When an article is passed or failed,
633:. This process will have multiple editors look over the article and determine if the original reviewer misinterpreted the GA criteria or performed an improper review. Although it is possible that the initial review of the article may be overturned, it is also possible that several editors may agree with the original reviewer and believe the article does not meet the GA criteria. If this is the case, look to any improvements that the reviewers suggest, implement them, and renominate the article again at GAN.
232:. Non-free images may be used only if their exclusion would impair a reader's understanding of the article. Non-free images must be low resolution (less than 300 pixels vertically or horizontally) and include detailed fair use rationales. On the image page, ensure that the rationale specifies the article that the image will be used for. Look at similar articles that have reached GA/FA status for examples. The use of images should comply with
46:
561:
editors at the article. Some issues may be raised concerning the GA criteria, MoS mistakes, or areas of incompleteness. If editors disagree with a particular suggestion, they should explain their rationales on the talk page, ask for further clarification, seek another editor's opinion, or, as a last resort, use
243:
If possible, use only free images that are available/applicable to the article's topic. Look for images already located on related
Knowledge articles or search Wikimedia Commons. If there are no images available, consider uploading an image of your own if you have the permission or ask the permission
508:
If the subject of the article has an official website, that website should normally be linked. Otherwise, do not include too many external links, but consider providing enough high-quality links that a reader could easily find more information on the topic. Webpages that are used to support text in
278:
Editors may use any style of referencing and any method of presenting citations that they choose, so long as the article is internally consistent. Well-developed articles generally use some form of inline referencing, which allows the readers and future editors to identify which specific source(s)
621:
If the article you are working on fails there are several options available. If issues that a reviewer brought up were not addressed, consider fixing any problems that were raised and renominating the article again at GAN. For further improvement, have a few independent editors or volunteers from
560:
Reviewers want articles to pass, but they may see problems or areas for improvement in nominated articles that conflict with the good article criteria. After putting an article on hold, the reviewer will mention issues/suggestions on the review page of the article that should be addressed by the
404:
Although the Manual of Style is comprehensive in improving every aspect of an article, a nomination does not need to meet every MoS guideline to reach GA status. However, the more accurately and uniformly the article follows these guidelines, the greater the benefit for its readers. A few common
134:, and check that if you were reviewing your own article, you would pass it. Do not think of your goal purely in terms of getting the article listed as a Good article: your goal is to get good feedback on the article, and hopefully, perhaps after some improvements, get it listed.
376:
When trying to find sources of information for an article, use a variety of resources such as books, websites, newspapers, journals, interviews, etc. Consider using a local library for researching information in printed resources. To find online resources, use websites such as
449:. Editors contributing from different countries tend to use their own spelling conventions, which can result in, for example, use of "theatre" and "theater" in the same article. Analyze the existing prose and the topic's context to determine which variant should be used.
207:
Although there is no set guideline on article length for GAs, it is best for the article not to be too short or so long that there is not enough focus on the topic. The article should be broad, covering multiple areas to give readers an overview of the topic.
274:
requires a source to be named for all direct quotations and any statement that a reader is likely to dispute, such as statistical information (ex: 47% of all goods were sold; 3 million people attended the event; the city sustained $ 588 million in damages).
389:
may be able to provide an earlier version of the article. Other options for finding information include asking members of a related WikiProject, asking experts of the topic you are researching, or asking editors who have edited similar or related articles.
572:. Remember that reviewing articles can be a difficult task, and the number of reviewers is limited. Attacking reviewers may remove them from the process, which will extend the time for articles to be reviewed and reflect badly on the GA process.
313:
The parenthetical system places the full citation in an alphabetical, bulleted list near the end of the article. Within the article text, a shortened citation names the author, (usually) year, and page number in parentheses, like this:
342:{{cite news |last=Tanner |first=Lindsey |title=Doctors use Wii games for rehab therapy |publisher=] |date= 8 February 2008 |url=http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2008-02-08-wii-rehabilitation_N.htm |accessdate=10 February 2008}}
198:
then the nomination might also be failed without a thorough review, and you won't get the feedback you need. Try to resolve such issues before nominating. Obvious vandalism, even at high rates, does not count against the article.
593:
for your user page documenting your achievement, and alert WikiProjects related to the article. They may be interested in mentioning the improvement of the article within their newsletter or spotlight department.
646:, to help with the large backlog that exists there. Since you have now had experience in the GA process, and have had your article pass or fail, you can help other editors determine if their articles meet the
528:
You can also learn more about reviews and help others by reading and commenting on the GA reviews that are underway for similar articles. Anyone may comment at a GA review, not just reviewers or nominators.
220:(introduction) should summarize the topic by touching on all of the various sections within the article. For articles of various lengths, guidelines recommend that the lead range from one to four paragraphs.
441:
Single sentences or very brief paragraphs normally shouldn't stand alone. Either attempt to expand on them by adding more information or going into greater detail or incorporate the paragraph with another
509:
an article should generally not be duplicated in the external links section. No article is required to have any external links, and every external link must be justifiable. Common errors are listed at
330:
Citations to online materials should be written out in full, in whatever style you are using, instead of simply including a bare URL. Whether you choose to manually format the full citation or use a
589:, and all WikiProject banners on the talk pages are updated to reflect the GA status. Keep the article on your watchlist to watch out for vandalism, POV, or removal of content. Consider adding a
455:
Lists should only be included if they can't be made into prose or their own article. An article that is filled with a large number of lists can be difficult to read and will not flow very well.
452:
Ensure tense remains consistent. For instance, if you say "Bob said hi," then all future commentary should be in the past tense ("Jane agreed and said hello" as opposed to "Jane says hello").
472:, and therefore compliance with it is, strictly speaking, optional. However, since you want the article to be in good shape, it's still a good idea to take a look at the external links.
484:
or in the last section on the page, which should be titled "External links"; they should not be present in the body of the article. One common error is linking company websites or
601:
status. For A class, related WikiProjects may have a department that can review the article to determine if it should be rated as A class. To proceed to
Featured article status, a
650:. You can review articles in the category that your article was in or pursue other topics that interest you. If you're new to reviewing, there are suggestions and tips at
557:. If an article is placed on hold, the reviewer believes that the article is close to passing, but several issues need to be addressed before the reviewer will pass it.
108:. Additionally, it contains information about what to do during and after the review. Before nominating an article it is recommended that the article comply with the
665:
process. The review by multiple editors helps to ensure that articles meet the GA criteria, and determine if an article should maintain its GA status or be delisted.
367:
Whatever method you use for formatting, providing full citations is strongly preferred to providing only a bare URL, which appears to the reader as either this:
554:
521:
Depending on the subject area, it may take up to a couple of months before a review starts. If you want to speed this process, you can contact any related
130:
The easiest way to avoid problems with a nomination is to put yourself in the reviewer's position. Read the guidelines on reviewing Good articles and the
305:
tag in a section towards the end of the article. When using the footnote system, a source can be re-used by naming it: <ref name="Exampletitle": -->
549:
The only way for a nominated article to be listed as a Good article is for a reviewer to look over the article and make sure that it complies with the
585:
If your article passes, there are several things you can do. First, make sure that the reviewer adds the article to the list of good articles at
321:
568:
It is best to be respectful to reviewers. Anyone can make a mistake, and the best way to prevent or solve problems is for all parties to
655:
606:
32:
726:
681:
304:
followed by an alphabetical list of full citations may be used. The footnoted citations are collected with the <references /: -->
61:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
651:
125:
62:
430:
When wikilinking, make sure that dates are only linked when relevant and avoid overlinking common knowledge terms and topics. See
326:. If parenthetical references are used inline, then the footnote system can be easily used for any necessary explanatory notes.
702:
500:) is a publicly traded company". Such links should be moved to the appropriate infobox and/or external links section instead.
334:
is your choice. Both of these examples (at lines #1 and #2) produce identical-looking citations for the reader (shown at #3):
438:
for guidelines. Also, ensure that the wikilink directs the reader to the correct article instead of a disambiguation page.
413:
409:
Avoid contractions (such as wouldn't, can't, should've, etc.) within the article unless they are part of a direct quote.
569:
590:
721:
399:
465:
253:
162:
371:
368:
347:
522:
626:
look over the article for you to give it a copyedit and point out where the article needs modifications.
300:
tags to create a clickable link following the assertion that it supports. Either full citations or
301:
280:
66:
237:
182:
76:
481:
431:
427:
When using abbreviations make sure they are expanded at their first occurrence in the article.
382:
307:
257:
154:
597:
Another option after the article passes is to improve the article further to reach A and/or
446:
421:
267:
146:
54:
675:
654:. If you are unsure about the process or need help in reviewing an article ask one of the
647:
550:
435:
378:
331:
292:
288:
284:
158:
131:
113:
661:
If you don't want to perform a full review of an article, you can still assist with the
510:
469:
217:
629:
If you disagree with a reviewer's assessment of an article, you can seek mediation at
715:
662:
643:
630:
610:
562:
497:
485:
233:
229:
166:
109:
105:
28:
69:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
623:
602:
598:
586:
417:
263:
150:
541:
editors are welcome to comment in reviews and to help improve nominated articles.
266:. While it is not necessary to provide a source for every single sentence or any
169:
tags, then you need to address the issue(s) raised before nominating the article.
104:
The following are tips for avoiding common mistakes when nominating an article at
381:
and Google
Scholar, online databases, and search engine searches. If you find a
271:
306:. This prevents you from having to retype the entire citation each time. See
137:
There are several problems which crop up frequently. Make sure you avoid them.
279:
support any given statement. The two most common inline reference styles are
17:
705:. Non-free images with higher resolutions must explain why this is necessary.
31:. If you want to discuss the decision of a Good Article reviewer, please see
339:
Tanner, Lindsey. (08 February 2008) at ]. Retrieved on 10 February 2008.
191:
a major expansion or reorganization (either underway or being planned), or
351:
372:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2008-02-08-wii-rehabilitation_N.htm
493:
27:
This guideline is intended to help editors in nominating articles at
488:
websites to the names of things mentioned in the text, like this: "
386:
112:, meet guidelines set by related WikiProjects, and meet all of the
537:
The only required job of a nominator is to nominate the article.
40:
525:
to remind them that the article is in the nominations queue.
177:
If the article is unstable due to work being done, such as:
145:
If there are valid clean-up tags on your article, including
658:
or leave a message on the talk page of GAN for assistance.
489:
701:
This is the equivalent of 0.1 megapixels, as described
91:
84:
642:
Consider reviewing one or two (or more!) articles at
244:
of an author of an image on websites such as Flickr.
605:may be recommended first, before looking over the
684:— Guide for other common mistakes and MoS errors.
678:— Requirements for an article to reach GA status.
228:Carefully scrutinize any non-free images against
262:Articles are expected to be well-supported by
8:
492:is an organization that..." or "Apple Inc. (
320:harv error: no target: CITEREFRitter2002 (
120:Before nominating: review your own article
405:Manual of Style errors are listed below.
348:"Doctors use Wii games for rehab therapy"
188:frequent editing due to a current event,
694:
609:. The article can then be nominated at
613:if you believe it meets the criteria.
315:
656:WikiProject Good Article participants
412:Measurements should include both the
299:The footnote system uses <ref: -->
7:
346:Tanner, Lindsey (8 February 2008).
682:User:Ealdgyth/GA review cheatsheet
67:thoroughly vetted by the community
63:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
652:Knowledge:Reviewing good articles
126:Knowledge:Reviewing good articles
468:guidelines is not listed in the
44:
480:Such links belong either in an
293:deprecated as of September 2020
1:
611:Featured article candidates
194:proposed merges and splits,
743:
397:
251:
123:
74:
38:Essay on editing Knowledge
26:
727:WikiProject Good articles
663:Good article reassessment
631:Good article reassessment
563:good article reassessment
400:Knowledge:Manual of Style
33:Good article reassessment
289:parenthetical references
285:parenthetical references
254:Knowledge:Citing sources
29:Good article nominations
445:Language use should be
383:dead link for a source
365:
185:among regular editors,
470:Good article criteria
420:. Consider using the
336:
132:Good article criteria
114:Good article criteria
65:, as it has not been
517:Waiting for a review
272:verifiability policy
424:for easier editing.
302:shortened citations
270:facts, Knowledge's
570:assume good faith
533:During the review
476:Location of links
466:WP:External links
332:citation template
310:for more details.
258:Knowledge:REFPUNC
102:
101:
16:(Redirected from
734:
722:Knowledge essays
706:
699:
576:After the review
422:Convert template
387:Internet Archive
379:news aggregators
362:
360:
358:
325:
268:common knowledge
264:reliable sources
248:Inline citations
94:
87:
48:
47:
41:
21:
742:
741:
737:
736:
735:
733:
732:
731:
712:
711:
710:
709:
700:
696:
691:
672:
639:
619:
583:
578:
547:
535:
519:
504:Choice of links
462:
436:MOS:UNLINKDATES
402:
396:
356:
354:
345:
319:
260:
250:
226:
214:
205:
175:
143:
128:
122:
110:manual of style
98:
97:
90:
83:
79:
71:
70:
45:
39:
36:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
740:
738:
730:
729:
724:
714:
713:
708:
707:
693:
692:
690:
687:
686:
685:
679:
671:
668:
667:
666:
659:
638:
635:
618:
615:
582:
579:
577:
574:
546:
543:
534:
531:
518:
515:
506:
505:
478:
477:
461:
460:External links
458:
457:
456:
453:
450:
443:
439:
428:
425:
410:
395:
392:
364:
363:
343:
340:
328:
327:
311:
249:
246:
225:
222:
213:
210:
204:
203:Article length
201:
196:
195:
192:
189:
186:
174:
171:
163:External links
142:
139:
121:
118:
100:
99:
96:
95:
88:
80:
75:
72:
60:
59:
51:
49:
37:
24:
18:Knowledge:GNGA
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
739:
728:
725:
723:
720:
719:
717:
704:
698:
695:
688:
683:
680:
677:
674:
673:
669:
664:
660:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
640:
636:
634:
632:
627:
625:
616:
614:
612:
608:
604:
600:
595:
592:
588:
580:
575:
573:
571:
566:
564:
558:
556:
552:
544:
542:
540:
532:
530:
526:
524:
516:
514:
512:
503:
502:
501:
499:
495:
491:
487:
486:stock trading
483:
475:
474:
473:
471:
467:
459:
454:
451:
448:
444:
440:
437:
433:
429:
426:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
407:
406:
401:
393:
391:
388:
384:
380:
374:
373:
369:
353:
349:
344:
341:
338:
337:
335:
333:
323:
317:
312:
309:
303:
298:
297:
296:
294:
290:
286:
282:
276:
273:
269:
265:
259:
255:
247:
245:
241:
239:
235:
234:WP:MOS#Images
231:
223:
221:
219:
211:
209:
202:
200:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
179:
178:
172:
170:
168:
165:and multiple
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
141:Clean-up tags
140:
138:
135:
133:
127:
119:
117:
115:
111:
107:
93:
89:
86:
82:
81:
78:
73:
68:
64:
58:
56:
50:
43:
42:
34:
30:
19:
697:
628:
620:
596:
584:
567:
559:
548:
538:
536:
527:
523:WikiProjects
520:
507:
479:
463:
418:metric units
403:
375:
366:
355:. Retrieved
352:USAToday.com
329:
277:
261:
242:
227:
215:
206:
197:
176:
144:
136:
129:
103:
52:
676:GA criteria
648:GA criteria
637:Other tasks
624:Peer review
607:FA criteria
603:peer review
551:GA criteria
398:Main page:
394:Brief fixes
357:10 February
316:Ritter 2002
238:WP:CAPTIONS
173:Instability
53:This is an
716:Categories
591:GA userbox
447:consistent
432:WP:CONTEXT
308:WP:REFNAME
287:, however
252:See also:
124:See also:
555:see below
545:Reviewers
490:Meta-Wiki
414:customary
281:footnotes
77:Shortcuts
670:See also
442:section.
318:, p. 45)
183:edit war
155:Copyedit
511:WP:ELNO
482:infobox
147:Cleanup
85:WP:GNGA
644:WP:GAN
494:Nasdaq
385:, the
370:or as
230:WP:FUC
224:Images
159:Trivia
106:WP:GAN
92:WP:NGA
689:Notes
587:WP:GA
55:essay
703:here
617:Fail
581:Pass
498:AAPL
464:The
434:and
416:and
359:2008
322:help
283:and
256:and
236:and
218:lead
216:The
212:Lead
167:Fact
539:All
291:is
181:an
151:POV
718::
599:FA
565:.
513:.
496::
350:.
295:.
240:.
161:,
157:,
153:,
149:,
116:.
361:.
324:)
314:(
57:.
35:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.