August 29
- Image:ShamWingsAirlinesLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Avelladore (notify | contribs).
- Obsolete - This Logo has been replaced by a newer version, Image:ChamWingsAirlinesLogo.jpg. I am the uploader of this logo. Avelladore (talk) 01:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Aaron Roney Swim.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Twitchax (notify | contribs).
- UE image of a user, user is inactive for over 1.5 years and image is used in violation of WP:NOT (webhost/myspace). Doug. 00:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Related MfD here.--Doug. 14:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- UE image of inactive (1.5+ years) user. Doug. 00:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Related MfD here.--Doug. 14:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, poor quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:23, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Shell_casings.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bandit1108 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, low quality given major clutter in background, absent uploader Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Chris_T_Church_2007.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jake_Q_Monk (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unsure of an encyclopedic use to the photo of a sign Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Clark_kenith.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adrewstyle (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Photos_by_azario_2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Caliguitarest (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Dawn_Devil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dawn_devil_2006 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:303.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Onesexycop (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photograph Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photograph Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic personal picture Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Packsaddle_007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Clayd61 (notify | contribs).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
- Delete - Peripitus (Talk) 13:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Subway restaurant banner.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AgnosticPreachersKid (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation; orphaned 72.88.62.253 (talk) 03:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Not orphaned anymore and there are many pictures on the Wiki with images of corporate banners or signs. APK is gonna miss Jeffpw 03:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Bad licence; copyright is owned by the Subway Restaurant Chain (or whoever owns them), it's not incidental, but central to image. Really isn't necessary for the article it's used in, no rationale and a valid one probably cannot be written. WilyD 12:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
Deleted. Orphaned, with no clear purpose. WilyD 12:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:K-3_finished.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Khalidteemer (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, appears Unencyclopedic (i don't think this is the colin steele we have articles on) Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
Deleted. Orphaned, unlikely to be useful. WilyD 12:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
Deleted. Orphaned, unlikely to be useful. WilyD 12:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:K-State_Student_Union.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Unionpr (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
Deleted. Orphaned, unlikely to ever be of use. WilyD 12:31, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
Deleted. Orphaned, unlikely to ever be used. WilyD 12:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:K.K.Neelemgam_&_DMK_Origin.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spjaganathan (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
- Delete - without OTRS permission this image would be deleted at commons as well - Peripitus (Talk) 13:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:K-Water_Paint-001.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kanmani (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic. thoughts about whether this should be transferred to commons instead? the permission could be better documented, but it seems likely that the artist was the uploader Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
Deleted. Orphaned, unlikely to ever be useful. WilyD 12:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KC_REIGN_PHOTO_SHOOT_12-1-07_002_(2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KcReign (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
Deleted. Orphaned, unlikely to ever be used. WilyD 12:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KARASOULOS_Wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eva_Evangelakou (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (page deleted) Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
Deleted. Orphaned, unlikely to ever be used. WilyD 13:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KATHY-SHOT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Renieinabeanie (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (article deleted) Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KDHfourP1010060.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bashereyre (notify | contribs).
- derivative work (photo of a photo) Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KDHOneP1010062.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bashereyre (notify | contribs).
- likely copyvio (derivative work) Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:23, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KHADI_YOUNOU.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Khadija_El_Younoussi (notify | contribs).
- used only on userpage up for deletion - if that is deleted please delete this too Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:23, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, copyvio? Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:24, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KJACK_SSOUNDS.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joshuah_Hounshell (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, probable copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KJACK_NPZONE.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joshuah_Hounshell (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KJH.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Passeypizza (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KKSingh_Speaking.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Singhke (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, appears to be a photo of a photo so who knows who the copyright owner is Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KK1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Olukayodeibrahim (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KK_Twinkle_diff.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KrakatoaKatie (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, copyvio? Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KMarino.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kerry_Marino (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KOE_US_Embassy_Athens_2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Laokratia (notify | contribs).
- archive photo that is supposedly PD-self, which I don't entirely understand. it's also not in use, so it doesn't seem terribly crucial. i say delete unless we have further confirmation that this is self-taken Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. From the nature of the image (taken out of the midst of the radical demonstrators), the editing profile of the uploader, and their user name ("Laokratia"), I understand they probably wished to imply they represent the organisation in question, so the "PD" might actually be correct. But since they haven't been active and the image was apparently never used, it's probably not worth waiting for an OTRS ticket. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:39, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well, anyway, just for the fun of it, I've sent them a request for OTRS confirmation. It's actually a nice image in a way. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- So you're both a facist and a communist? Interesting choice of ideologies, my friend. Anyway, I do hope that we can find a way to save this image, it's encyclopedic and well composed. It illustrates Protest march in a way that many of those images do not. With any luck, the OTRS certification will be timely and we can keep this one. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Well, anyway, just for the fun of it, I've sent them a request for OTRS confirmation. It's actually a nice image in a way. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- claimed "personal collection" but sourced to random website Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- user claimed "personal collection" on other images sourced to random websites, see http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Ajit.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KSRC_Banner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Widhibrata (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:KSGLogo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Justachic33 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, copyvio (derivative work) Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:44, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, copyvio (derivative work) Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:44, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Hensel twins2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Argentine lad (notify | contribs).
- We don't need to see this magazine cover to understand that those conjoined girls where featured on the cover. I believe the image is being used more as an illustration of the girls likeness (what would make this replaceable, since this is a drawing) and as an illustration of polycephaly (what can also be replaced my freely available material). Damiens.rf 15:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think it's a drawing. Appears to be a processed photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:06, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
- Delete - copyright cannot be verified as there is neither a source nor attribution to the creator. The image is certainly not PD in germany, if that is the source - see Knowledge (XXG):Citing_sources#When_uploading_an_image and WP:NFCC#10 for this requirement - Peripitus (Talk) 06:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- This picture with unknown/unverifiable source and licensing information is not necessary for the article it's being used in. Damiens.rf 16:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - WWII-era operational photograph. I'm sure these are public domain in Germany right now. How about the ' Anonymous-EU ' template if it exists? I contacted the website operator from which i obtained them. No reply so its possible they are of an uncertain status. Also - possibly Imperial War Museum (IWM) images. --maxrspct ping me 17:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
- Delete - copyright cannot be verified as there is neither a source nor attribution to the creator. The image is certainly not PD in germany, if that is the source - see Knowledge (XXG):Citing_sources#When_uploading_an_image and WP:NFCC#10 for this requirement - Peripitus (Talk) 06:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Eppler stanstede.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Max rspct (notify | contribs).
- This picture with unknown/unverifiable source and licensing information is not necessary for the article it's being used in Damiens.rf 16:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - WWII-era operational photograph. I'm sure these are public domain in Germany right now. How about the ' Anonymous-EU ' template if it exists? I contacted the website operator from which i obtained them. No reply so its possible they are of an uncertain status. Also - possibly Imperial War Museum (IWM) images. --maxrspct ping me 17:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
- Delete - copyright cannot be verified as there is neither a source nor attribution to the creator. The image is certainly not PD in germany, if that is the source - see Knowledge (XXG):Citing_sources#When_uploading_an_image and WP:NFCC#10 for this requirement - Peripitus (Talk) 06:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- This picture, showing some men posing for the camera, with unknown/unverifiable source and licensing information is not necessary for the articles it's being used in. Damiens.rf 16:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - WWII-era operational photograph. I'm sure these are public domain in Germany right now. How about the ' Anonymous-EU ' template if it exists? I contacted the website operator from which i obtained them. No reply so its possible they are of an uncertain status. Also - possibly Imperial War Museum (IWM) images. --maxrspct ping me 17:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
keep, seems to be PD after all, thanks to Matthiasb for the research. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Dawsonfieldcamels.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Max rspct (notify | contribs).
- We don't need to see this picture of grounded airplanes and camels to understand this article about the planes hijacking. Also, source information is missing. Damiens.rf 16:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep but allow uploader to add rationale - if you read the caption it was part of the terrorists' press conference video showing the planes on the ground. It is some of the only footage of the hijacking. Yes, it needs a rationale, but we should assume good faith and allow the uploader to fix up the image. JRG (talk) 00:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- There's a rationale and it says "news image being used to describe a particular event", That happens to be an invalid rationale, but I agree with you there's no bad faith in writting a bad rationale or uploading and image against our policies. The user is probably just misinformed. --Damiens.rf 01:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- It was probably done before complex rationales were required. Can you tell him he needs to update the rationale? JRG (talk) 02:33, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- There's a rationale and it says "news image being used to describe a particular event", That happens to be an invalid rationale, but I agree with you there's no bad faith in writting a bad rationale or uploading and image against our policies. The user is probably just misinformed. --Damiens.rf 01:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- IMO this picture even qualifies for commons since, art. 32 of the Jordan law (see art. 10 of the amendment) says that images are protected for 25 years. The picture is definitely taken in Jordan and definitely in 1970 so it should be in the PD. --Matthiasb (talk) 12:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Nick de toit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Max rspct (notify | contribs).
- This image has no source and confusing licensing information. Both public domain and fair use is claimed. The rationale for fair use seems to be that the image was "Used in BBC artICLEe". The image is watermarked to Associated Press. Damiens.rf 16:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image is not used, copyright holder is not identified. Damiens.rf 16:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete if unverifiable. Its so long ago. maxrspct ping me 18:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
- Delete - Given the 7 days JRG asked for but the OTRS email is not yet here. There is nothing that clearly says this is a PD image Obviously a correct OTRS email will allow the image to be restored. - Peripitus (Talk) 13:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:JimTurnour.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Timeshift9 (notify | contribs).
- Image is not found at source url provided, making it difficult to verify the claimed public domain status. Damiens.rf 16:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep and note to closing nominator - the picture may well have been at the page linked, but the page is no longer available. Unless the nominator has concrete evidence that the photo is not public domain or can't be used for any purpose then this image should be kept in good faith. While I don't have the last archive of the page, this web archive from 2006 said the images that were up then can be used for any purposes. I note the page has been updated since then but the archives come up as blank. JRG (talk) 00:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Where does it says it can be used for "any purpose"? On the link you provided, I only see "media or print production purposes". --Damiens.rf 15:21, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- I read that broadly. There is no prohibition at all, and it just says that usages are allowed. As I said, the page was updated at least twice after that so we cannot tell the license. We must assume good faith and keep the image unless verifiable information is available to show it is not released into the public domain or kept for any purpose. This is not a fair use image so the onus is on you to prove that. JRG (talk) 08:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Second note to closing moderator - can you please hold this debate for at least 7 days? I am going to contact Jim Turnour (or I will get Timeshift9 to do so) so we can confirm the license on the image. There's no point in idiotical argument about what might be the license when we truly don't know. (We can also ask Jim for a free photo if none is provided by that one). JRG (talk) 13:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- WP:OTRS - make sure he sends a copy of any permission email to them. Badger me and I'll resolve it speedy-like. WilyD 11:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
- Keep - Peripitus (Talk) 07:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Waterfallrailcrash.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JRG (notify | contribs).
- Picture (no, it's not a screenshot) copied from a news source, not used for commentary about the image itself (because it's not notable by itself), but for commentary about the important event captured on the image. Damiens.rf 17:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - the user did not notice that I have since uploaded a new picture free of any NFCC#2 issues and updated the image template - I uploaded this before I was aware of the proper template licensing issues and have now fixed it. The closing nominator should take note that the spurious nomination was based on the image's previous form and incomplete fair use rationale (which was adequate and fine at the time the image was originally uploaded, which was before the new rules came in at the end of 2006). The image is a valid non-free use which meets all NFCC criteria as far as I am aware. The nominator is citing policy that does not exist - there is no requirement that the image itself be notable in order to fulfil fair use/non-free criteria only that it add significantly to the article - which it does - It is an image of a non-reproducible significant historical event which occurred in a remote place inaccessible to the general public and of which there are no free images available. An accident is not simply describable by text - an image should be present to improve the article and show the aftermath of the accident (as described and referenced therein). JRG (talk) 04:01, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- It should be noted I am happy for the previous version of the image to be deleted from Knowledge (XXG), but not the present one. JRG (talk) 04:02, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: Noting for the record that the original nomination was correctly argued and would have led to deletion, I also confirm that the replacement now uploaded seems to fit under {{Non-free copyright holder}} (fair use for non-commercial purposes endorsed by owner) and thus NFCC#2 is now passed. I'd then go for a weak keep. (Passing notice: It's interesting that the two photographs are almost identical and seem to have been taken by the same person from the exact same spot, probably only a few seconds apart. Could well be the case that the ultimate copyright status is identical for both.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- I asked the person voting keep to upload the government version of the image. I feel the press photo would not have worked, since the event was only a few years ago and could still be used to make money. This photo, from the government, was taken for the purpose to inform people and it is only unfree due to the Crown Copyright. I also believe this image should be kept, to show the physical destruction of the train. User:Zscout370 19:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep reasonable rationale. DGG (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Copyrighted image being used to show a living person Damiens.rf 17:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Unnecessary and possible replaceable non-free image copied from a news source. Damiens.rf 17:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Replaceable non-free diagram. Damiens.rf 17:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:DCS promo front.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xallium (notify | contribs).
- Replaceable picture of a building Damiens.rf 17:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was:
Kept. Copyright seems to have expired January 1, 2007. WilyD 11:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- This non-free image copied from a news source is not necessary for the understanding of the article it's currently being used in. Damiens.rf 17:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - meets all NFCC criteria. This is a non-reproducible historic and iconic image of the first TV news broadcast on the ABC ever, which is used to in the section of the article on the beginning of television broadcasts in Australia and is now sourced - and is extremely relevant for the understanding of the television station. The "news source" reason is not a reason for deletion as such - it's a source about replacing the commercial value of the image and given the ABC is Government-owned this is hardly relevant. Dibble I believe died earlier this year or last year, so it is definitely not replaceable. If the closing nominator thinks I or someone else can fix up the rationale, please tell me - but deleting a historic image like this for a spurious reason is not the way to go if we want to improve the encyclopedia. JRG (talk) 02:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- The main point of the nomination is not really the "news source" kind of image (WP:NFCC#2) since, as far as I understand, them image is not really being used to illustrate a news/historic fact. The point of the nominations is really WP:NFCC#8. For instance, could you elaborate on how looking to this still from the first TV news broadcast on the ABC ever can help us to understand the history of ABC? And in the article about James Dibble, the image is just serving our interests in illustrating an article about that person (what's the fair use here?) --Damiens.rf 15:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Any idiot (except you) can see that such an image illusrates the history of the ABC. The ABC is a television station, so of course an image of the first broadcast is going to add to it. How on earth would it not? JRG (talk) 12:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- The main point of the nomination is not really the "news source" kind of image (WP:NFCC#2) since, as far as I understand, them image is not really being used to illustrate a news/historic fact. The point of the nominations is really WP:NFCC#8. For instance, could you elaborate on how looking to this still from the first TV news broadcast on the ABC ever can help us to understand the history of ABC? And in the article about James Dibble, the image is just serving our interests in illustrating an article about that person (what's the fair use here?) --Damiens.rf 15:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I do see that this passes WP:NFCC#8 (it increases my understanding at least). Really an iconic image in Australian television history showing the first news broadcast. I cannot see any way that this can be adequately replaced by text alone. A question on the copyright also as the image is over 50 years old; according to this I think the image became PD in 2006 - the specific text is "The rule for duration of copyright in a broadcast was 50 years from the end of the year the broadcast was made" Peripitus (Talk) 07:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Well, if the image is determined to be PD, it should be kept, and used wherever it may be of the slightest help. --Damiens.rf 15:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Well, if the image is determined to be PD, it should be kept, and used wherever it may be of the slightest help. --Damiens.rf 15:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Coal Ship.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Soulnebula (notify | contribs).
- Not used. Conflicting source/licensing information. Damiens.rf 17:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Vampire finch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HaloPikachu (notify | contribs).
- Not used. Conflicting source/licensing information. Damiens.rf 17:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Win-news-griffith-last.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Timg231 (notify | contribs).
- Image is not necessary to "facilitate critical commentary and discussion" about the article. Damiens.rf 17:20, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Scott dooley200.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by LollieVolts! (notify | contribs).
- Even if that e-mail conversation is to be documented on otrs, that's not a valid PD release, but just a permission to use the image on Knowledge (XXG). Damiens.rf 17:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Cowonroadnagpur.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danianjan (notify | contribs).
- A completely invalid reason given for this image to be on the public domain: The source website's (a news source) terms of use is cited, mentioning a permission for using the image for review and criticism. Damiens.rf 17:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Oneoftopfourcollegesnagpur.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danianjan (notify | contribs).
- A completely invalid reason given for this image to be on the public domain: The source website's (a news source) terms of use is cited, mentioning a permission for using the image for review and criticism. Damiens.rf 17:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Mainoffnaguniv.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danianjan (notify | contribs).
- A completely invalid reason is given for this image to be on the public domain: "no explicit copyright policy was found on the source webpage" Damiens.rf 17:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:VCAstadiumnagpur.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danianjan (notify | contribs).
- A completely invalid reason is given for this image to be on the public domain: "no explicit copyright policy was found on the source webpage" Damiens.rf 17:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Reservebanknagpur.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danianjan (notify | contribs).
- Not free. More of a no-derivatives license. Damiens.rf 17:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Ambazarientrance.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danianjan (notify | contribs).
- A completely invalid reason is given for this image to be on the public domain: " the image is originally listed on a government website, and no explicit copyright policy was found on the source webpage" Damiens.rf 17:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Dragonpalace.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danianjan (notify | contribs).
- Not free. More of a no-derivatives license. Damiens.rf 17:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Ramdaspethgurudwara.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danianjan (notify | contribs).
- Not free. More of a no-derivatives license. Damiens.rf 17:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Sitabuldifort.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danianjan (notify | contribs).
- Not used. Not free. More of a no-derivatives license. Damiens.rf 17:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Orange Nagpur.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danianjan (notify | contribs).
- Not free. More of a no-derivatives license. Damiens.rf 17:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- No reason to believe this image was released to the PD. Uploader has made many other PD mistakes (see nominations above) Damiens.rf 17:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Nagpurusedbookmarket.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danianjan (notify | contribs).
- A completely invalid reason given for this image to be on the public domain: The source website's (a news source) terms of use is cited, mentioning a permission for using the image for review and criticism. Damiens.rf 17:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, clearly not PD and not a chance of this passing the non-free use criteria on Knowledge (XXG), beeing used only on a "gallery of" page like that. --Sherool (talk) 18:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 18:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Cameron_clarke.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ben7217 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photograph Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:DKHTKYO.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danny_Tokyoite (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Spain_Again.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danny_Tokyoite (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:MankindPsychosis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yona100 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic graphic design Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contrubiton of user, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:PassportDru.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dru.johnson (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic personal photo - if it is a passport photo, then it would be copyright by the photographer. Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:44, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Lucky_Bamboo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shane198three (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:K_with_snake.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kstargazer (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:DSC05831.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vivacubadiscos (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Snowww.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ModernMajorGeneral (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:DanHnatchuk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danhnatchuk (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality, unencyclopedic peronal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Gabrielino Tongva dancers at Kuruvunga Springs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Miss Mondegreen (notify | contribs).
- bad tagging as "unique historic photograph", but neither unique nor historic; picture from a repeated annual public event; obviously replaceable. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, blurry, copyvio (of the figurines). Sandstein 19:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep - It is not 'copyvio', as this image couldn't replace the real figurines for their intended use, and displaying the image doesn't detract from the product. It is completely free for use and may improve the article Dwarf (Warhammer). --Ifrit (talk) 03:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- I have now edited and reuploaded it, and inserted it into the aforementioned article. --Ifrit (talk) 03:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I've fixed the tag and added a fair use rationale - seems obvious enough that it's appropriate for an article on the product photographed. WilyD 11:24, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image kept -Nv8200p talk 15:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Image:WinthropHouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Phiveoff (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, this is not likely PD given the shadowing of the image. Jordan 1972 (talk) 20:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencylopedic user designed logo Jordan 1972 (talk) 20:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, low quality due to the light reflection, and unsure if it is a copyright violation to photograph consumer product packaging. Jordan 1972 (talk) 20:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Dyosalogo-banner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ladysoseono (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal designed graphic Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Bigoverview224.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Memogron (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, possiblity copyright violation given image shadowing Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencylopedic and lower quality, WP:COI issues perhaps Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:London_date_3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Musical_overdose (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:London_date.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Musical_overdose (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photograph Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Cgutierrez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Musical_overdose (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Combinedarms.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Finalseraphim (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, claim of PD, but appears to be a computer game screen shot Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, low quality due to image rotation Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, low quality -- fuzzy Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:44, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, unsure of an encyclopedic use and insufficent information about context to determine one. Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole remaining contributionof user, unencyclopedic user designed logo Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:51, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:HEROSofbeaverton.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Matthoiland (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absetnt uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:01, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:117432488_ecfadf6110.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tecumseh1973 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:117430754_0b9d09dc65.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tecumseh1973 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:IMGP0629.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Paulharding150 (notify | contribs).
- Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 22:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 22:20, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted Commons showing through
- Image:Hussein.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Soonadracula (notify | contribs).
- Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 22:20, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Image:Ronald theodore reuther.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shermanista (notify | contribs).
- image is copyright (c) 2002 to a SF-chronicle staff photographer. Here uploaded with a note about fair-use but with a free licence. Not only is the licence incorrect but the images falls under Knowledge (XXG):NFC#Images_2 item 6, (unnaceptable use of press images). also fails WP:NFCC#2 - Respect for commercial opportunities. - Peripitus (Talk) 22:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 22:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Myspace_picture_of_me.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by -Justin- (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal picture Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Briefs2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Deanraymond (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Meandvic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SquishyVic (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Mebored.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SquishyVic (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, nonencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo -- it also appears based on the colouring that the head may be a cut out from somewhere else. Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo, may be the source of the "head" in the above nomination. Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:BIGJONEZ.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cleotisdudley (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo. Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Cleotus6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cleotisdudley (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo, basis of the above nominated image. Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Man_in_sports_briefs.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Autocrat11 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencylopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo - deleted unnessesary text uploaded with image. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)