237:, a reference work. To decide what should be in it purely on the basis of what is merely popular or interesting to whatever small group of editors happens to be around at the time that a discussion is had, is to head down the road towards chaos and confusion. Knowledge's editing community comprises a broad spectrum of people from around the world, and what is uninteresting and dislikable to some is of vital interest to others. It is neither productive nor desired to have multiple groups of editors trying to out-"vote" one another, treating editorial decisions on content and topics as popularity contests. We have had experience of this in years gone by, and it did not lead to the betterment of the encyclopaedia. Human knowledge is what Knowledge covers, and its extent is determined by the world at large, as documented and recorded in reliable sources, not by us as editors choosing what we personally consider to be popular. Again, we base our arguments upon what sources say, not upon our personal likes and dislikes.
134:
35:
119:
416:
Ray makes a further important observation: the people who, in her words, "reject objectivity and facts to find truth" are likely to ascribe those same methods to their opponents, because it is "entirely consistent with their beliefs" that everyone else does as they do. Nonetheless, that does not make
391:
to do is to sink to that level oneself. "I just like it."/"I just don't like it." is as weak and feeble an argument in rebuttal of its opposite as it is weak and feeble in counterargument to any other point. One may point out that such arguments are subjective, have no bases in
Knowledge policies and
288:
It is certainly fair to argue that changing something might make that something easier for novices but would be a problem for experienced editors used to the current situation. But an editor who simply says "I like it" is being intellectually dishonest by failing to acknowledge the first half of this
176:
At
Knowledge, we require the opposite to apply. Emotion does not trump logic. The point of an encyclopedia is to provide information, not to describe what you "like" or "don't like". We are not trying to "win" what Steele and Beasor characterize as a "game". Knowledge is not a business deal. It is an
320:
Just as in other contexts, merely stating one's opinion about someone else, or their behavior, is not helpful or useful to others. Identify and explain the reasons for the opinion that you hold. Focus on the result (actual edits to articles, policy pages, talk pages, etc.) of the actions at issue,
370:
How can logic deal with such an attitude? It is very difficult – how often I've had the experience of answering every objection raised by our otherwise reasonable opponent who then responds, "I'm sorry. I know you're probably right, but I just don't like it!" Or as expressed by a representative ,
284:
When discussing whether a particular aspect of the
Knowledge user interface should be changed to be easier for novices, it is not uncommon for experienced editors to say, of that aspect, "I like it." Typically this is phrased as "I don't have any problems with that" or "It's easy for me" or "I've
451:
Ideally you want to read an intelligent account of what you've attempted to do and you want argument about the reasons it has or has not been achieved. You don't want someone saying, "I didn't like it. It's not for me." That's completely subjective; that's personal chemistry. When you read a
3153:
272:"This is a contentious issue; leave it be". Well, of course. If it weren't a contentious issue, there would be no discussion. Please evaluate the arguments on both sides with respect to the principal naming criteria from a neutral point of view and explain your position.
523:
Kiparsky, as cited in Lasnik, observes that, from the point of view of strict logical construction, "I don't like it" does not actually mean "I dislike it", although that is what speakers sometimes intend it to mean. In linguistics, this sort of transformation is called
1193:
2354:
1758:
275:"There is no consensus for this". Although this can be an appropriate response when an editor disagrees with another editor's assessment of a move discussion, it is not a substantive reason to oppose a move during the discussion itself.
396:
simply try to out-vote such arguments with their opposites. Knowledge is not helped by a return to the practices of yesteryear with gangs of editors organizing argument-free collections of block votes. Knowledge is organized through
1223:
2489:
3040:
2920:
2092:
321:
not the person who did them, and explain how those results are consistent with, or contrary to, policy, guidelines, conventions or the good of the encyclopedia. Give specific examples, normally identified with diffs.
2449:
2258:
1853:
285:
gotten used to it that way". All of these are variants on expressing the personal opinion that "I like it". None are relevant to the question of whether the user interface aspect is a problem for novice editors.
3293:
2601:
1238:
3303:
3569:
3564:
2855:
1560:
3233:
2980:
452:
well-argued review and it says, "I don't like it because of x, y, and z.", although at the time you rage against what the critic has said, maybe two or three months later you think, "They were right."
3045:
905:
481:
explains, discussion pages at
Knowledge are not for voicing and debating our personal opinions on subjects. They are there for discussing the writing and editing of the encyclopaedia. Talk pages are
3358:
1658:
3343:
3093:
1633:
1688:
1385:
3661:
3363:
2770:
1956:
1410:
1333:
915:
2810:
2790:
1753:
1723:
184:, called "I just don't like it" a "feeble argument". In Knowledge discussions, that argument, and its counterpart "I just like it", are feeble and should be given no weight whatsoever.
1035:
2047:
1773:
1535:
1050:
990:
965:
955:
1123:
3508:
1455:
2815:
2895:
2850:
2760:
2710:
1976:
1703:
1678:
406:
230:
3403:
1693:
1328:
1313:
814:
300:
When there is acknowledgment by experienced editors that an aspect of the user interface that they like is, in fact, difficult for novices, then two things become possible:
2730:
1293:
3617:
2885:
2800:
1916:
1768:
1673:
1288:
1248:
1103:
217:
requires that we make the best efforts to leave our prejudices at the door when we edit here, be they political, social, geographic, linguistic, cultural, or otherwise.
3513:
2606:
2519:
2117:
1858:
1683:
1608:
1343:
1318:
1243:
1025:
855:
494:
2494:
2439:
2424:
2940:
2890:
2745:
2037:
1375:
1258:
1138:
311:
that experienced editors can select to put the user interface back to the way that they've become accustomed to. Such workarounds minimize the costs of the change.
155:, Paul Steele and Tom Beasor recommend a tactic in business negotiation, which they characterize as a "trick of the trade", called "emotion trumps logic", thusly:
3473:
2102:
1848:
1585:
1510:
1080:
597:
The Nordic
Languages and Modern Linguistics, Proceedings of the International Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 1969
2157:
431:
One tell-tale characteristic of the employment of such an argument is implicit in the word "just". Part of the very problem with such arguments is that they are
3368:
3020:
2865:
2785:
2454:
2203:
2132:
1986:
1283:
714:
Global energy assessment and outlook: proceedings of the
International Scientific Forum on Changes in Energy, held in Mexico City, Mexico, November 9–13, 1981
3413:
2970:
2177:
1668:
1555:
1545:
1435:
1338:
1323:
2955:
2925:
2735:
2484:
2479:
2016:
1465:
1420:
1350:
469:
that like or dislike. This takes us part of the way towards what is wanted here at
Knowledge. But we must take things yet further still. Not only must we
3268:
1713:
1088:
802:
197:
Editing disputes are expected to be settled by reasoned civil discourse, and editors are expected to base their arguments as to content upon what can be
304:
A consensus is more likely to develop as to whether the advantages of the change, for novices, are worth the costs of the change to experienced editors.
3223:
3098:
1118:
2985:
2700:
2097:
1783:
1565:
1550:
1395:
1308:
925:
910:
355:
Dealing with such arguments comprises two separate activities: not making such arguments oneself, and addressing such arguments when made by others.
3656:
3574:
3493:
2875:
2835:
2549:
2172:
2162:
2082:
1598:
1500:
1430:
1218:
712:(1984). "Problems in Public Perception of Nuclear Power: Fears and Risks Analyzed". In Behram Kurşunoğlu; Arnold Perlmutter; Linda F. Scott (eds.).
2218:
3353:
2715:
2152:
1898:
1390:
1070:
930:
289:
argument, if the editor accepts that half, and is being stupid if unaware that what they think, as an experienced editor, is somehow relevant for
2514:
2459:
2429:
900:
3183:
3103:
1966:
1843:
1060:
269:. This is not an argument not to move this article there. Please address the arguments made in support, and explain why you disagree with them.
3498:
3468:
3463:
3258:
3238:
3035:
2795:
2464:
2419:
2414:
2223:
2107:
2011:
1748:
1460:
1405:
1360:
1298:
1268:
1173:
1163:
935:
2780:
1380:
3433:
3308:
3158:
2880:
2576:
2384:
2263:
2112:
1708:
1530:
1480:
1020:
482:
371:"They want you to use reason and logic it's time to start using our emotions and feelings, not reason and logic, in making our decisions."
3448:
3388:
3313:
2805:
2775:
2695:
2524:
1495:
1485:
1450:
1263:
1168:
890:
329:
Many discussions on
Knowledge devolve into statements of opinion that the editor expects to be accepted as fact. This is an example of
3458:
3323:
3298:
3278:
3178:
2950:
2409:
2318:
2278:
2182:
1838:
1823:
1698:
1303:
1153:
1108:
1065:
1040:
1000:
850:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3600:
3428:
3408:
3333:
3328:
2900:
2389:
2032:
1941:
1803:
1738:
1648:
1638:
1613:
1575:
1570:
1505:
1273:
1233:
1178:
768:
744:
720:
666:
642:
51:
1886:
2504:
1996:
3622:
3488:
3025:
2313:
2298:
2213:
1788:
1133:
880:
875:
392:
guidelines, and as such hold little to no water at
Knowledge, and are often ignored outright when determining consensus. But one
736:
Eric S. Knowles and Jay A. Linn (2004). "The Importance of Resistance to Persuasion". In Eric S. Knowles and Jay A. Linn (ed.).
3418:
3228:
3198:
3163:
2990:
2469:
2379:
2293:
1936:
1906:
960:
218:
214:
3584:
3453:
3283:
3010:
2910:
2720:
2596:
2509:
2474:
2399:
2369:
2233:
2067:
2057:
2006:
1833:
1818:
1743:
1515:
1365:
1208:
995:
940:
865:
795:
618:
202:
2167:
2499:
2394:
2359:
1188:
3559:
3373:
3288:
3050:
2995:
2915:
2870:
2825:
2820:
2705:
2539:
2334:
2042:
1863:
1643:
1618:
1525:
1520:
1400:
1113:
1030:
945:
860:
504:
210:
2434:
3610:
3383:
3263:
3143:
3118:
2945:
2581:
2544:
2534:
2137:
2077:
1931:
1228:
1203:
1158:
1055:
1010:
985:
975:
950:
3503:
3318:
3203:
3128:
3015:
2935:
2905:
2755:
2374:
2344:
2308:
2198:
2062:
1981:
1763:
1628:
1593:
1440:
1198:
1148:
1143:
870:
249:
discussion about a specific article or a discussion about wording in a naming convention guideline. Non-constructive
1926:
3605:
3554:
3193:
3188:
3148:
3133:
3123:
3000:
2845:
2750:
2253:
2243:
2142:
1951:
1813:
1098:
970:
206:
3651:
3579:
3536:
3348:
3213:
3113:
3073:
3030:
2975:
2965:
2960:
2930:
2765:
2740:
2725:
2680:
2566:
2288:
2228:
1961:
1798:
1733:
1728:
1718:
1470:
1093:
845:
827:
788:
3253:
3208:
2571:
2444:
2404:
2208:
1946:
1475:
920:
542:
261:
already redirects here". Well, if that's not an error, that just shows that the topic of this article is the
3483:
3423:
3398:
3338:
3248:
3243:
2830:
2647:
2349:
2339:
2127:
2122:
1540:
1213:
1183:
1015:
198:
127:
Expressing a like or dislike for the issue in question is not a helpful or useful argument in a discussion.
3443:
3393:
3173:
3168:
3138:
2627:
2591:
2586:
2283:
2087:
1921:
1445:
1278:
1253:
1128:
477:
too. While opinion forms a part of theatre criticism, it doesn't form a part of encyclopaedia writing. As
262:
362:, talking about how to deal with irrational and subjective arguments, based upon "gut feelings", made in
159:
When faced with an incontrovertible fact use an emotional response to counter it. Expressions such as: "
3438:
3005:
2860:
2273:
2268:
2052:
1971:
1828:
1490:
498:
233:. The principle here is that we do not organize Knowledge along those lines. This is intended to be an
895:
760:
Kalina Stefanova (2000). "Criticism should be ... But in reality ...: Theatre-makers have their say".
682:
245:"I like it" and "I don't like it" are arguments to avoid in discussions about article titles, be it a
221:
indeed recommends that we actively attempt to include points of view that counter our own prejudices.
3378:
2840:
2637:
2561:
1425:
1370:
1355:
885:
693:
363:
3478:
3088:
2657:
2632:
2611:
1991:
1623:
1415:
980:
478:
55:
2652:
2642:
2556:
2529:
1793:
1045:
525:
439:
that statement, without any rational foundation or reasoned underpinnings. An observation by Sir
65:
17:
3108:
2072:
1911:
1808:
1005:
765:
741:
717:
663:
639:
615:
538:
444:
163:" or "the deal just doesn't seem to appeal to me" often beat dozens of well-argued statements.
2364:
2248:
2238:
2147:
811:
308:
43:
2001:
3273:
3218:
2303:
1603:
3645:
3154:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
709:
457:
440:
376:
359:
246:
234:
574:
This applies equally to synonyms such as "simply", as in "I simply don't like it".
133:
610:
Howard Lasnik (1975). "On the semantics of negation". In Donald Hockney (ed.).
546:
350:
330:
485:
and pronounce our personal opinions of the topics of encyclopaedia articles.
420:
Avoiding using the argument in reply to its use by others is but one part of
358:
The difficulty of addressing such arguments made by others is exemplified by
2355:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
595:
P. Kiparsky (1970). "Semantic Rules in Grammar". In H. Benedikktson (ed.).
148:, and their variants, are not arguments to use in talk page discussions.
428:
using "I just don't like it." and "I just like it.", and avoid doing so.
381:
Problems in Public Perception of Nuclear Power: Fears and Risks Analyzed
780:
177:
encyclopedia. Well-argued statements beat personal, subjective tastes.
465:
Eyre argues that a statement of like or dislike is not useful without
203:
introducing their own arguments, analyses, hypotheses, and conclusions
1759:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
612:
Contemporary Research in Philosophical Logic and Linguistic Semantics
341:
statement which the speaker expects the listener to accept as valid.
307:
Workarounds may be found for experienced editors, such as creating a
337:, a term which is used to identify and describe a sort of arbitrary
338:
132:
1224:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
565:
to persuasion, by rational arguments supported by cited sources.
3534:
3071:
2678:
1884:
825:
784:
3041:
Knowledge is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
229:"I like it" and "I don't like it" are also two of the several
113:
29:
2921:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2093:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
634:
Paul Steele and Tom Beasor (1999). "Practical Negotiation".
424:
avoiding using it oneself. One should recognize when one is
2450:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2259:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1854:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1194:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
561:("I won't do it") components. Knowledge editors should be
3294:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
3304:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
101:
94:
87:
80:
73:
2856:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2490:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
1561:
Knowledge is not being written in an organized fashion
541:, "I don't like it" is one of the three components of
2602:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1239:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
906:
Editing Knowledge is like visiting a foreign country
417:
it correct to do so in response, here at Knowledge.
3593:
3547:
2620:
2327:
2191:
2025:
1897:
1657:
1584:
1079:
838:
3565:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3344:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
828:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
253:arguments in requested move discussions include:
3662:Knowledge essays about building the encyclopedia
1689:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
1634:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1386:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
495:Knowledge:Arguments to avoid on discussion pages
3364:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
3094:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
2771:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1411:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
916:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
449:
401:, not votes. Indeed, in many discussions here,
368:
157:
137:This expression suggests "I just don't like it"
3046:Knowledge is not the place to post your résumé
2791:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
1957:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
1724:Counting and sorting are not original research
1754:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
1036:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
796:
8:
3284:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
2048:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
1774:How to save an article proposed for deletion
1051:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
991:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
966:Not editing because of Knowledge restriction
333:("He, himself, said it"), also known as the
2816:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
1536:Understanding Knowledge's content standards
694:"John Dewey and American Democracy," p. 359
435:an expression of like or dislike. They are
3544:
3531:
3509:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
3081:
3068:
2896:Notability is not relevance or reliability
2851:News coverage does not decrease notability
2761:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
2711:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
2688:
2675:
1894:
1881:
1704:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
1679:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
835:
822:
803:
789:
781:
407:Polling is not a substitute for discussion
231:arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
3404:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
1694:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1314:Identifying and using independent sources
762:Who Keeps The Score on the London Stages?
3570:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
2731:Big events make key participants notable
1294:Formatting bilateral relations templates
3618:How to contribute to Knowledge guidance
3234:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge" as "Wiki"!
2981:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
2886:Notability is not a level playing field
2801:How the presumption of notability works
1917:Contributing to complicated discussions
1769:How the presumption of notability works
1289:Formatting bilateral relations articles
1104:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
587:
516:
3514:You should not write meaningless lists
2811:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
2118:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
1859:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
1684:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1249:Don't hope the house will build itself
1026:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge
856:All Five Pillars are equally important
690:The Century dictionary and cyclopedia,
2941:One sentence does not an article make
2891:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2607:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2520:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
2038:A weak personal attack is still wrong
1977:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1609:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1376:Minors and persons judged incompetent
1139:An unfinished house is a real problem
1124:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
740:. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 5.
704:
702:
7:
3474:Things that should not be surprising
3169:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2495:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2440:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2425:Don't call people by their real name
2103:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1511:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
473:to "I just don't like it.", we must
3369:No one cares about your garage band
3021:What is and is not routine coverage
2866:No one cares about your garage band
2786:Existence does not prove notability
2204:Assume the assumption of good faith
2133:There is no Divine Right of Editors
1987:Relationships with academic editors
1849:Why was the page I created deleted?
1284:Featured articles may have problems
614:. D. Reidel Publishing Co. p. 300.
3414:Please do not murder the newcomers
2971:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2455:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
2178:Knowledge should not be a monopoly
1669:Adjectives in your recommendations
1556:Knowledge is not a reliable source
1546:What an article should not include
1436:The problem with elegant variation
1244:Don't get hung up on minor details
692:pp. 379-380; Westbrook, Robert B.
553:component. The other two are the
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
52:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
2736:Businesses with a single location
2017:You have a right to remain silent
1466:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1421:Potential, not just current state
1351:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
681:Whitney, William Dwight. (1906).
18:Knowledge:Just don't like it
2485:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2480:Don't ignore community consensus
1714:Confusing arguments mean nothing
716:. Taylor & Francis. p. 108.
638:. Gower Publishing, Ltd. p. 81.
403:it is not about the votes at all
117:
33:
3657:Knowledge essays about deletion
2986:Sources must be out-of-universe
2701:All high schools can be notable
2098:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
1784:Identifying blatant advertising
1566:The world will not end tomorrow
1551:Knowledge is a work in progress
1396:Not everything needs a template
1309:How to write a featured article
926:External criticism of Knowledge
911:Editors will sometimes be wrong
475:subtract the subjective opinion
219:Knowledge:Writing for the enemy
3575:Avoid writing redundant essays
3494:What Knowledge is not/Outtakes
3224:Don't stuff beans up your nose
3099:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
2926:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
2876:Notability cannot be purchased
2836:Masking the lack of notability
2173:Knowledge is not about winning
1599:Copyediting reception sections
1501:Temporary versions of articles
1431:Principle of Some Astonishment
1219:Creating controversial content
1119:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
316:Dispute resolution discussions
1:
3601:About policies and guidelines
3354:List of jokes about Knowledge
2716:Articles with a single source
2163:Two wrongs don't make a right
2153:The rules of polite discourse
2083:It's not the end of the world
1844:Knowledge is not Whack-A-Mole
1391:Not everything needs a navbox
1259:Don't "teach the controversy"
1071:Knowledge is not RationalWiki
931:Here to build an encyclopedia
364:the debate over nuclear power
3184:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
3104:Alternatives to edit warring
1967:Maintaining a friendly space
1061:Knowledge is an encyclopedia
443:, discussing the subject of
168:Paul Steele and Tom Beasor,
3469:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3464:The first rule of Knowledge
3259:Editing under the influence
3036:Knowledge is not Crunchbase
2796:Google searches and numbers
2515:Don't template the regulars
2430:Don't call the kettle black
2224:Be excellent to one another
2108:Revert notification opt-out
2012:We are all Wikipedians here
1461:Put a little effort into it
1406:Obtain peer review comments
1361:Introduction to structurism
1299:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1269:Editors are not mindreaders
1174:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1164:Beef up that first revision
936:Leave it to the experienced
901:Don't search for objections
557:("I don't believe it") and
483:not soapboxes to stand upon
345:Dealing with such arguments
3678:
3499:Why not create an account?
3434:Requirements for adminship
3309:How to vandalize correctly
3239:Don't delete the main page
3159:Avoid using preview button
2881:Notability comparison test
2465:Don't fight fire with fire
2460:Don't eat the troll's food
2420:Don't call a spade a spade
2415:Don't bludgeon the process
2264:Encourage full discussions
2113:Shadowless Fists of Death!
1749:Don't attack the nominator
1709:But there must be sources!
1531:Try not to leave it a stub
1481:Source your plot summaries
505:Thought-terminating cliché
348:
280:User interface discussions
63:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge
3543:
3530:
3449:Sarcasm is really helpful
3389:Notability is not eternal
3314:How to win a citation war
3084:
3080:
3067:
2776:Every snowflake is unique
2696:Advanced source searching
2691:
2687:
2674:
2577:No, you can't have a pony
2525:Do not insult the vandals
2385:Don't be high-maintenance
1942:Encouraging the newcomers
1893:
1880:
1486:Specialized-style fallacy
1451:Pruning article revisions
1279:Endorsements (commercial)
1264:Editing on mobile devices
1169:Blind men and an elephant
1144:Articles have a half-life
891:Dissent is not disloyalty
861:Avoid vague introductions
834:
821:
738:Resistance and Persuasion
3459:The Night Before Wikimas
3324:Ignore every single rule
3299:How to get away with UPE
3179:Before they were notable
2951:Overreliance upon Google
2746:Common sourcing mistakes
2319:Settle the process first
2279:Imagine others complexly
2183:Writing for the opponent
2158:There is no common sense
1839:Unopposed AFD discussion
1824:Relisting can be abusive
1699:Avoid repeated arguments
1304:Give an article a chance
1154:Avoid mission statements
1114:Advanced text formatting
1109:Advanced article editing
1066:Knowledge is a community
1041:The rules are principles
1001:Product, process, policy
851:Articles must be written
559:motivational/behavioural
125:This page in a nutshell:
3594:Policies and guidelines
3429:Requests for medication
3409:Please bite the newbies
3334:Mess with the templates
2901:Notability means impact
2435:Don't call things cruft
2410:Don't be the Fun Police
2340:Knowledge:Because I can
2219:Avoid the word "vandal"
2033:A thank you never hurts
1804:Liar liar pants on fire
1739:Deletion is not cleanup
1649:Writing better articles
1639:Write the article first
1614:Gender-neutral language
1586:Writing article content
1576:Writing better articles
1571:Write the article first
1506:Tertiary-source fallacy
1274:Encourage the newcomers
1234:Dictionaries as sources
1179:Build content to endure
658:Wouter H. Slob (2002).
413:ballots to be stuffed.
3623:Policy writing is hard
3489:Knowledge is an MMORPG
3329:Is that even an essay?
3026:What notability is not
2781:Existence ≠ Notability
2390:Don't be inconsiderate
2314:Read before commenting
2299:Mind your own business
2214:Avoid personal remarks
1789:Identifying test edits
1134:A navbox on every page
1089:100K featured articles
886:Concede lost arguments
881:Competence is required
549:. It is the so-called
463:
385:
335:bare assertion fallacy
174:
138:
3419:Pledge of Tranquility
3164:Avoid using wikilinks
2991:Subjective importance
2505:Don't spite your face
2294:Keep it down to earth
2058:Beware of the tigers!
1997:Too long; didn't read
1937:Edit at your own pace
1907:Accepting other users
1674:AfD is not a war zone
1021:There is no seniority
961:Neutrality of sources
764:. Routledge. p. 100.
215:Neutral Point of View
136:
54:, as it has not been
3585:Quote your own essay
3454:Sausages for tasting
3279:Five Fs of Knowledge
3229:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3199:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
3011:Vanispamcruftisement
2911:Notability sub-pages
2721:Avoid template creep
2681:Essays on notability
2597:There are no oracles
2380:Don't be a WikiBigot
2234:Call a spade a spade
2007:Unblock perspectives
1834:The Heymann Standard
1819:Overzealous deletion
1779:I just don't like it
1516:There is no deadline
1381:"Murder of" articles
1209:Common-style fallacy
1081:Article construction
996:Process is important
941:Levels of competence
866:Be a reliable source
662:. Springer. p. 127.
636:Business Negotiation
447:, illustrates this:
225:Deletion discussions
170:Business Negotiation
161:I just don't like it
153:Business Negotiation
142:I just don't like it
3374:No one really cares
3289:Go ahead, vandalize
3051:Two prongs of merit
2996:Third-party sources
2916:Notabilitymandering
2871:No one really cares
2826:Inherent notability
2821:Independent sources
2706:Alternative outlets
2540:Nationalist editing
2510:Don't take the bait
2475:Don't help too much
2400:Don't be prejudiced
2370:Don't be an ostrich
2335:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
2068:Deletion as revenge
2043:Advice for hotheads
1864:No Encyclopedic Use
1744:Does deletion help?
1644:Writing about women
1526:The deadline is now
1521:There is a deadline
1401:Nothing is in stone
1031:Tendentious editing
946:Levels of consensus
660:Dialogical Rhetoric
497:(more specifically
479:Knowledge:Talk page
297:experience levels.
182:Dialogical Rhetoric
180:Wouter H. Slob, in
3384:No sorcery threats
3264:Embrace Stop Signs
3144:Assume good wraith
3119:Anti-Wikipedianism
2956:Perennial websites
2946:Other stuff exists
2582:Passive aggression
2545:No angry mastodons
2535:Hate is disruptive
2395:Don't be obnoxious
2360:Don't be a fanatic
2138:Most ideas are bad
2078:Forgive and forget
1887:Essays on civility
1496:Run an edit-a-thon
1229:Deprecated sources
1204:Citation underkill
1189:Chesterton's fence
1159:Be neutral in form
1056:Knowledge in brief
1011:Reasonability rule
976:Oversimplification
951:Most ideas are bad
409:, remember. There
162:
139:
3639:
3638:
3635:
3634:
3631:
3630:
3526:
3525:
3522:
3521:
3504:Yes legal threats
3319:Ignore all essays
3204:Complete bollocks
3129:Asshole John rule
3063:
3062:
3059:
3058:
3016:What BLP1E is not
2936:One hundred words
2906:Notability points
2670:
2669:
2666:
2665:
2470:Don't give a fuck
2345:Civil POV pushing
2309:Mutual withdrawal
2199:Assume good faith
2168:Knowledge clichés
2063:Civility warnings
1982:Please say please
1932:Editors' pronouns
1876:
1875:
1872:
1871:
1764:Follow the leader
1629:Use our own words
1594:Avoid thread mode
1441:Pro and con lists
1199:Citation overkill
1149:Autosizing images
871:Civil POV pushing
539:social psychology
445:theatre criticism
241:Title discussions
160:
131:
130:
112:
111:
74:WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT
16:(Redirected from
3669:
3652:Knowledge essays
3580:Finding an essay
3545:
3532:
3194:Butterfly effect
3189:Boston Tea Party
3149:Assume stupidity
3134:Assume bad faith
3124:Articlecountitis
3082:
3069:
3001:Trivial mentions
2846:Minimum coverage
2689:
2676:
2375:Don't be ashamed
2254:Discussing cruft
2244:Deny recognition
2143:Nothing is clear
1952:Expect no thanks
1895:
1882:
1814:Nothing is clear
1661:deleting content
1344:Tertiary sources
1099:Acronym overkill
971:The one question
836:
823:
816:
812:Knowledge essays
805:
798:
791:
782:
775:
774:
757:
751:
750:
733:
727:
726:
706:
697:
679:
673:
672:
655:
649:
648:
631:
625:
624:
607:
601:
600:
592:
575:
572:
566:
535:
529:
521:
461:
383:
325:Because I say so
172:
121:
120:
114:
104:
97:
95:WP:IDONTLIKETHEM
90:
83:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
3677:
3676:
3672:
3671:
3670:
3668:
3667:
3666:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3627:
3589:
3560:Value of essays
3539:
3518:
3349:Legal vandalism
3214:Counting juntas
3114:Anti-Wikipedian
3076:
3074:Humorous essays
3055:
3031:What to include
2976:Run-of-the-mill
2966:Read the source
2931:Offline sources
2726:Bare notability
2683:
2662:
2616:
2567:No Confederates
2365:Don't be a jerk
2323:
2289:Keep it concise
2229:Beyond civility
2187:
2021:
1962:How to be civil
1927:Don't retaliate
1889:
1868:
1799:Keep it concise
1734:Delete the junk
1729:Delete or merge
1719:Content removal
1653:
1619:Myth vs fiction
1580:
1471:Robotic editing
1334:Science sources
1329:Primary sources
1319:History sources
1094:Abandoned stubs
1075:
846:Article content
830:
817:
809:
779:
778:
771:
759:
758:
754:
747:
735:
734:
730:
723:
708:
707:
700:
680:
676:
669:
657:
656:
652:
645:
633:
632:
628:
621:
609:
608:
604:
594:
593:
589:
584:
579:
578:
573:
569:
536:
532:
522:
518:
513:
491:
462:
456:
384:
375:
353:
347:
327:
318:
282:
263:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
243:
227:
195:
193:Article content
190:
173:
167:
151:In their book,
144:, its inverse,
118:
108:
107:
100:
93:
86:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3675:
3673:
3665:
3664:
3659:
3654:
3644:
3643:
3637:
3636:
3633:
3632:
3629:
3628:
3626:
3625:
3620:
3615:
3614:
3613:
3608:
3597:
3595:
3591:
3590:
3588:
3587:
3582:
3577:
3572:
3567:
3562:
3557:
3551:
3549:
3541:
3540:
3535:
3528:
3527:
3524:
3523:
3520:
3519:
3517:
3516:
3511:
3506:
3501:
3496:
3491:
3486:
3481:
3476:
3471:
3466:
3461:
3456:
3451:
3446:
3441:
3436:
3431:
3426:
3421:
3416:
3411:
3406:
3401:
3396:
3391:
3386:
3381:
3376:
3371:
3366:
3361:
3356:
3351:
3346:
3341:
3336:
3331:
3326:
3321:
3316:
3311:
3306:
3301:
3296:
3291:
3286:
3281:
3276:
3271:
3266:
3261:
3256:
3254:Editsummarisis
3251:
3246:
3241:
3236:
3231:
3226:
3221:
3216:
3211:
3209:Counting forks
3206:
3201:
3196:
3191:
3186:
3181:
3176:
3171:
3166:
3161:
3156:
3151:
3146:
3141:
3136:
3131:
3126:
3121:
3116:
3111:
3106:
3101:
3096:
3091:
3085:
3078:
3077:
3072:
3065:
3064:
3061:
3060:
3057:
3056:
3054:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3038:
3033:
3028:
3023:
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2983:
2978:
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2898:
2893:
2888:
2883:
2878:
2873:
2868:
2863:
2858:
2853:
2848:
2843:
2838:
2833:
2828:
2823:
2818:
2813:
2808:
2803:
2798:
2793:
2788:
2783:
2778:
2773:
2768:
2766:Don't cite GNG
2763:
2758:
2753:
2748:
2743:
2741:But it's true!
2738:
2733:
2728:
2723:
2718:
2713:
2708:
2703:
2698:
2692:
2685:
2684:
2679:
2672:
2671:
2668:
2667:
2664:
2663:
2661:
2660:
2655:
2650:
2645:
2640:
2638:WikiHarassment
2635:
2630:
2624:
2622:
2618:
2617:
2615:
2614:
2609:
2604:
2599:
2594:
2589:
2584:
2579:
2574:
2572:No queerphobia
2569:
2564:
2559:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2542:
2537:
2532:
2527:
2522:
2517:
2512:
2507:
2502:
2497:
2492:
2487:
2482:
2477:
2472:
2467:
2462:
2457:
2452:
2447:
2442:
2437:
2432:
2427:
2422:
2417:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2392:
2387:
2382:
2377:
2372:
2367:
2362:
2357:
2352:
2347:
2342:
2337:
2331:
2329:
2325:
2324:
2322:
2321:
2316:
2311:
2306:
2301:
2296:
2291:
2286:
2281:
2276:
2271:
2266:
2261:
2256:
2251:
2246:
2241:
2236:
2231:
2226:
2221:
2216:
2211:
2209:Assume no clue
2206:
2201:
2195:
2193:
2189:
2188:
2186:
2185:
2180:
2175:
2170:
2165:
2160:
2155:
2150:
2145:
2140:
2135:
2130:
2125:
2120:
2115:
2110:
2105:
2100:
2095:
2090:
2085:
2080:
2075:
2070:
2065:
2060:
2055:
2050:
2045:
2040:
2035:
2029:
2027:
2023:
2022:
2020:
2019:
2014:
2009:
2004:
1999:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1979:
1974:
1969:
1964:
1959:
1954:
1949:
1947:Enjoy yourself
1944:
1939:
1934:
1929:
1924:
1919:
1914:
1909:
1903:
1901:
1891:
1890:
1885:
1878:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1870:
1869:
1867:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1786:
1781:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1746:
1741:
1736:
1731:
1726:
1721:
1716:
1711:
1706:
1701:
1696:
1691:
1686:
1681:
1676:
1671:
1665:
1663:
1660:
1655:
1654:
1652:
1651:
1646:
1641:
1636:
1631:
1626:
1621:
1616:
1611:
1606:
1601:
1596:
1590:
1588:
1582:
1581:
1579:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1563:
1558:
1553:
1548:
1543:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1483:
1478:
1476:Sham consensus
1473:
1468:
1463:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1326:
1321:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1186:
1181:
1176:
1171:
1166:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1091:
1085:
1083:
1077:
1076:
1074:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
938:
933:
928:
923:
921:Explanationism
918:
913:
908:
903:
898:
893:
888:
883:
878:
873:
868:
863:
858:
853:
848:
842:
840:
832:
831:
826:
819:
818:
810:
808:
807:
800:
793:
785:
777:
776:
769:
752:
745:
728:
721:
698:
674:
667:
650:
643:
626:
619:
602:
586:
585:
583:
580:
577:
576:
567:
564:
560:
556:
552:
530:
515:
514:
512:
509:
508:
507:
502:
499:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
490:
487:
476:
472:
468:
454:
438:
434:
427:
423:
412:
404:
400:
395:
390:
373:
346:
343:
326:
323:
317:
314:
313:
312:
305:
296:
292:
281:
278:
277:
276:
273:
270:
247:Requested Move
242:
239:
226:
223:
194:
191:
189:
186:
165:
146:I just like it
129:
128:
122:
110:
109:
106:
105:
98:
91:
84:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3674:
3663:
3660:
3658:
3655:
3653:
3650:
3649:
3647:
3624:
3621:
3619:
3616:
3612:
3609:
3607:
3604:
3603:
3602:
3599:
3598:
3596:
3592:
3586:
3583:
3581:
3578:
3576:
3573:
3571:
3568:
3566:
3563:
3561:
3558:
3556:
3553:
3552:
3550:
3546:
3542:
3538:
3533:
3529:
3515:
3512:
3510:
3507:
3505:
3502:
3500:
3497:
3495:
3492:
3490:
3487:
3485:
3484:Watchlistitis
3482:
3480:
3479:The WikiBible
3477:
3475:
3472:
3470:
3467:
3465:
3462:
3460:
3457:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3447:
3445:
3442:
3440:
3437:
3435:
3432:
3430:
3427:
3425:
3424:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3422:
3420:
3417:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3407:
3405:
3402:
3400:
3399:Play the game
3397:
3395:
3392:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3377:
3375:
3372:
3370:
3367:
3365:
3362:
3360:
3357:
3355:
3352:
3350:
3347:
3345:
3342:
3340:
3339:My local pond
3337:
3335:
3332:
3330:
3327:
3325:
3322:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3312:
3310:
3307:
3305:
3302:
3300:
3297:
3295:
3292:
3290:
3287:
3285:
3282:
3280:
3277:
3275:
3272:
3270:
3267:
3265:
3262:
3260:
3257:
3255:
3252:
3250:
3249:Edits Per Day
3247:
3245:
3244:Editcountitis
3242:
3240:
3237:
3235:
3232:
3230:
3227:
3225:
3222:
3220:
3217:
3215:
3212:
3210:
3207:
3205:
3202:
3200:
3197:
3195:
3192:
3190:
3187:
3185:
3182:
3180:
3177:
3175:
3172:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3162:
3160:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3150:
3147:
3145:
3142:
3140:
3137:
3135:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3120:
3117:
3115:
3112:
3110:
3107:
3105:
3102:
3100:
3097:
3095:
3092:
3090:
3087:
3086:
3083:
3079:
3075:
3070:
3066:
3052:
3049:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3034:
3032:
3029:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3002:
2999:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2912:
2909:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2897:
2894:
2892:
2889:
2887:
2884:
2882:
2879:
2877:
2874:
2872:
2869:
2867:
2864:
2862:
2859:
2857:
2854:
2852:
2849:
2847:
2844:
2842:
2839:
2837:
2834:
2832:
2831:Insignificant
2829:
2827:
2824:
2822:
2819:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2809:
2807:
2804:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2794:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2784:
2782:
2779:
2777:
2774:
2772:
2769:
2767:
2764:
2762:
2759:
2757:
2754:
2752:
2749:
2747:
2744:
2742:
2739:
2737:
2734:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2704:
2702:
2699:
2697:
2694:
2693:
2690:
2686:
2682:
2677:
2673:
2659:
2656:
2654:
2651:
2649:
2648:WikiLawyering
2646:
2644:
2641:
2639:
2636:
2634:
2631:
2629:
2626:
2625:
2623:
2621:WikiRelations
2619:
2613:
2610:
2608:
2605:
2603:
2600:
2598:
2595:
2593:
2590:
2588:
2585:
2583:
2580:
2578:
2575:
2573:
2570:
2568:
2565:
2563:
2560:
2558:
2555:
2551:
2548:
2547:
2546:
2543:
2541:
2538:
2536:
2533:
2531:
2528:
2526:
2523:
2521:
2518:
2516:
2513:
2511:
2508:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2498:
2496:
2493:
2491:
2488:
2486:
2483:
2481:
2478:
2476:
2473:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2463:
2461:
2458:
2456:
2453:
2451:
2448:
2446:
2445:Don't cry COI
2443:
2441:
2438:
2436:
2433:
2431:
2428:
2426:
2423:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2413:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2405:Don't be rude
2403:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2388:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2378:
2376:
2373:
2371:
2368:
2366:
2363:
2361:
2358:
2356:
2353:
2351:
2350:Cyberbullying
2348:
2346:
2343:
2341:
2338:
2336:
2333:
2332:
2330:
2326:
2320:
2317:
2315:
2312:
2310:
2307:
2305:
2302:
2300:
2297:
2295:
2292:
2290:
2287:
2285:
2282:
2280:
2277:
2275:
2272:
2270:
2267:
2265:
2262:
2260:
2257:
2255:
2252:
2250:
2247:
2245:
2242:
2240:
2237:
2235:
2232:
2230:
2227:
2225:
2222:
2220:
2217:
2215:
2212:
2210:
2207:
2205:
2202:
2200:
2197:
2196:
2194:
2190:
2184:
2181:
2179:
2176:
2174:
2171:
2169:
2166:
2164:
2161:
2159:
2156:
2154:
2151:
2149:
2146:
2144:
2141:
2139:
2136:
2134:
2131:
2129:
2128:The last word
2126:
2124:
2123:The grey zone
2121:
2119:
2116:
2114:
2111:
2109:
2106:
2104:
2101:
2099:
2096:
2094:
2091:
2089:
2086:
2084:
2081:
2079:
2076:
2074:
2071:
2069:
2066:
2064:
2061:
2059:
2056:
2054:
2051:
2049:
2046:
2044:
2041:
2039:
2036:
2034:
2031:
2030:
2028:
2024:
2018:
2015:
2013:
2010:
2008:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1995:
1993:
1990:
1988:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1973:
1970:
1968:
1965:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1920:
1918:
1915:
1913:
1910:
1908:
1905:
1904:
1902:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1883:
1879:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1750:
1747:
1745:
1742:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1732:
1730:
1727:
1725:
1722:
1720:
1717:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1685:
1682:
1680:
1677:
1675:
1672:
1670:
1667:
1666:
1664:
1662:
1656:
1650:
1647:
1645:
1642:
1640:
1637:
1635:
1632:
1630:
1627:
1625:
1622:
1620:
1617:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1605:
1602:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1589:
1587:
1583:
1577:
1574:
1572:
1569:
1567:
1564:
1562:
1559:
1557:
1554:
1552:
1549:
1547:
1544:
1542:
1541:Walled garden
1539:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1514:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1484:
1482:
1479:
1477:
1474:
1472:
1469:
1467:
1464:
1462:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1374:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1366:Mine a source
1364:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1214:Concept cloud
1212:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1184:Cherrypicking
1182:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1165:
1162:
1160:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1107:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1084:
1082:
1078:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1016:Systemic bias
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
882:
879:
877:
874:
872:
869:
867:
864:
862:
859:
857:
854:
852:
849:
847:
844:
843:
841:
837:
833:
829:
824:
820:
813:
806:
801:
799:
794:
792:
787:
786:
783:
772:
770:9789057551161
767:
763:
756:
753:
748:
746:9780805844863
743:
739:
732:
729:
724:
722:9783718602247
719:
715:
711:
705:
703:
699:
695:
691:
688:
686:
678:
675:
670:
668:9781402009099
665:
661:
654:
651:
646:
644:9780566080722
641:
637:
630:
627:
622:
617:
613:
606:
603:
598:
591:
588:
581:
571:
568:
562:
558:
554:
550:
548:
544:
540:
534:
531:
527:
520:
517:
510:
506:
503:
500:
496:
493:
492:
488:
486:
484:
480:
474:
470:
466:
459:
453:
448:
446:
442:
436:
432:
429:
425:
421:
418:
414:
410:
408:
402:
398:
393:
388:
382:
378:
372:
367:
365:
361:
356:
352:
344:
342:
340:
336:
332:
324:
322:
315:
310:
306:
303:
302:
301:
298:
294:
290:
286:
279:
274:
271:
268:
267:ProposedTitle
264:
260:
259:ProposedTitle
256:
255:
254:
252:
248:
240:
238:
236:
232:
224:
222:
220:
216:
213:sources. The
212:
208:
204:
200:
192:
188:Applicability
187:
185:
183:
178:
171:
164:
156:
154:
149:
147:
143:
135:
126:
123:
116:
115:
103:
99:
96:
92:
89:
85:
82:
78:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
3548:About essays
3537:About essays
3444:Rouge editor
3394:Oops Defense
3174:Barnstaritis
3139:Assume faith
2961:Pokémon test
2806:High Schools
2628:WikiBullying
2592:Superhatting
2587:POV railroad
2284:Just drop it
2088:Nobody cares
1922:Divisiveness
1778:
1446:Printability
1339:Style guides
1129:Amnesia test
986:Paraphrasing
761:
755:
737:
731:
713:
710:Dixy Lee Ray
689:
684:
677:
659:
653:
635:
629:
611:
605:
599:. Reikyavik.
596:
590:
570:
533:
519:
464:
458:Richard Eyre
450:
441:Richard Eyre
430:
419:
415:
386:
380:
377:Dixy Lee Ray
369:
360:Dixy Lee Ray
357:
354:
334:
328:
319:
299:
287:
283:
266:
258:
250:
244:
235:encyclopedia
228:
196:
181:
179:
175:
169:
158:
152:
150:
145:
141:
140:
124:
41:
3555:Essay guide
3439:Rouge admin
3006:Video links
2861:No big loss
2550:just madmen
2500:Don't shout
2274:How to lose
2269:Get over it
2053:Be the glue
1972:Negotiation
1829:Relist bias
1659:Removing or
1491:Stub Makers
1324:Law sources
1254:Don't panic
526:Not Hopping
471:add reasons
467:reasons for
293:editors of
211:independent
42:This is an
3646:Categories
3611:Guidelines
3379:No, really
3359:LTTAUTMAOK
2841:Make stubs
2562:No racists
2304:Say "MOBY"
2026:Philosophy
1899:The basics
1456:Publicists
1426:Presentism
1371:Merge Test
1356:Inaccuracy
839:Philosophy
685:Ipse dixit
620:9027705127
582:References
547:persuasion
543:resistance
399:discussion
387:One thing
351:Truthiness
349:See also:
331:ipse dixit
3089:Adminitis
2658:WikiPeace
2633:WikiCrime
2612:UPPERCASE
1992:Thank you
1624:Proseline
1416:Permastub
981:Paradoxes
896:Don't lie
555:cognitive
551:affective
201:—without
66:Shortcuts
3606:Policies
2756:Coatrack
2653:WikiLove
2643:WikiHate
2557:No Nazis
2530:Griefing
1794:Immunity
1046:Trifecta
876:Cohesion
489:See also
422:entirely
394:must not
339:dogmatic
207:reliable
199:verified
3269:Emerson
3109:ANI flu
2073:Failure
1912:Apology
1809:Nothing
1006:Purpose
426:oneself
102:WP:JUST
88:WP:JDLI
2751:Clones
2328:Don'ts
2249:Desist
2239:Candor
2148:Reader
437:solely
411:are no
309:gadget
251:oppose
205:—from
81:WP:JDL
2002:Truce
511:Notes
44:essay
3274:Fart
3219:Crap
1604:Coup
956:Need
766:ISBN
742:ISBN
718:ISBN
664:ISBN
640:ISBN
616:ISBN
563:open
433:just
265:for
209:and
2192:Dos
815:(?)
545:to
537:In
389:not
295:all
291:all
3648::
701:^
687:,"
460:,
455:—
405:.
379:,
374:—
366::
166:—
804:e
797:t
790:v
773:.
749:.
725:.
696:.
683:"
671:.
647:.
623:.
528:.
501:)
257:"
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
