215:
an established view about the article already exists in the minds of several editors, who may defend the existing structure against changes. Even where they themselves might not entirely agree with it, it may already be the result of past battles between opposing viewpoints. Sometimes the established position may be eminently sensible, but in other cases it may be a historical accident due to the order in which information arrived at the article, or the knowledge of early contributors.
101:
211:
sub-articles it can be quite difficult to decide what level of information is appropriate in which article. It may even be difficult to determine what sub-articles exist, and how they relate to each other. Organisation does not come easily to everyone. It is especially hard in a non-hierarchical collaborative online environment like
Knowledge.
35:
214:
Yet another explanation is the natural disagreement which exists between editors as to what information is most important. In the case of less well established articles, an editor might reasonably add information without disagreement. In the case of a popular or fundamental topic, it is likely that
104:
Even though a newspaper has many sections, many writers strive to get their articles on the front page. The same phenomenon is true in
Knowledge, where editors often want to add contributions to the main article, rather than a sub-article, or in the lead, rather than in one of the sections of the
206:
One explanation for this behaviour is the natural desire of the author that their contributions be seen by as many readers as possible. Especially if an editor has a political or religious agenda, they will insist that their point appear in the intro, where it will get more attention, often
210:
An alternative explanation is the natural desire for all articles to be as complete as possible. This leads to editors inserting additional information, perhaps without sufficient thought as to the level of content appropriate to a main article. In a complex subject which already has many
112:
is an observed effect that editors are likely to insist that their contribution appear in the most prominent article, rather than in a sub-article where it may be better suited. Similar to this is
254:
120:
get by far the most attention from editors. The effect is especially prominent on highly visible and already reasonably complete topics, such as
224:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
51:
244:
153:
269:
249:
187:
234:
157:
229:
239:
133:
149:
195:
55:
207:
neglecting whether the point is substantially relevant, or how it is covered in the article body.
65:
191:
43:
172:
168:
117:
263:
176:
137:
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
141:
17:
100:
161:
121:
199:
180:
129:
125:
99:
29:
87:
80:
73:
8:
255:Knowledge:Guide to writing better articles
144:. Contributions should often be placed:
7:
225:Knowledge:General overview article
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
52:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
33:
245:Knowledge:Broad-concept article
1:
179:, etc., rather than the main
160:, etc., rather than the main
198:etc., rather than the main
136:in articles of a size like
286:
154:Weather extremes in Canada
63:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge
250:Knowledge:Content forking
188:Islam and other religions
235:Knowledge:Article series
158:Climate change in Canada
230:Knowledge:Summary style
240:Knowledge:Article size
106:
150:Temperature in Canada
110:Main article fixation
103:
54:, as it has not been
132:. Articles also get
196:Islamic eschatology
107:
192:Apostasy in Islam
98:
97:
18:Knowledge:LEADFIX
16:(Redirected from
277:
270:Knowledge essays
90:
83:
76:
74:WP:Lead fixation
37:
36:
30:
21:
285:
284:
280:
279:
278:
276:
275:
274:
260:
259:
221:
173:Human migration
169:Human evolution
94:
93:
86:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
283:
281:
273:
272:
262:
261:
258:
257:
252:
247:
242:
237:
232:
227:
220:
217:
204:
203:
184:
165:
96:
95:
92:
91:
84:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
282:
271:
268:
267:
265:
256:
253:
251:
248:
246:
243:
241:
238:
236:
233:
231:
228:
226:
223:
222:
218:
216:
212:
208:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
178:
177:Human anatomy
174:
170:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
146:
145:
143:
139:
138:United States
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:lead fixation
111:
102:
89:
85:
82:
78:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
213:
209:
205:
142:Donald Trump
113:
109:
108:
41:
134:overwhelmed
42:This is an
116:: article
88:WP:LEADFIX
66:Shortcuts
264:Category
219:See also
202:article.
183:article.
164:article.
105:article.
81:WP:MAFIX
162:Canada
122:Canada
200:Islam
181:Human
130:Islam
126:Human
118:leads
44:essay
140:and
128:and
194:,
186:In
175:,
167:In
148:In
266::
190:,
171:,
156:,
152:,
124:,
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
