Knowledge

:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Iowa - Knowledge

Source 📝

935:
the original article, or a copy of the first part of the original article. The subpages for In The News (ITN) and DYK items may also be copies of the lead paragraph or a portion of the article page. This approach to design of portals is sufficiently commonly used that it can be considered standard. However, it is an honorable experiment that has failed, and should be abandoned. In numerous cases, it has been found that portals have displayed outdated and incorrect information to the reader. These discrepancies have been especially common with, but not limited to, political leadership. These discrepancies are a serious problem because they cannot be readily corrected. Knowledge is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, meaning that any reasonably computer-literate person can edit an article; but editing the displayed information in a portal requires specialized technical knowledge of how portals are implemented, which is presumably why errors persist, sometimes for years. An editor who has Twinkle installed can tag articles in need of editing if they do not have the time or knowledge to fix them; but tagging via Twinkle is not available for portals. Experience has shown that the use of portal subpages that copy portions of articles results in outdated information being displayed, sometimes for years, because it is difficult to correct. This design technique, partial article copies, has been an honorable experiment over the course of more than a decade, but the experiment should be assessed to have been a failure. It has also been noted that copying portions of articles to portal subpages without attribution is a violation of the CC-BY-SA
1619:
guidelines is in dispute. Those who would like to retain existing regional portals, and possibly create more regional portals, may either deal with the existing guidelines or propose to revise them. If they prefer to deal with the existing guidelines, there are two issues. The first is that the status of the guidelines is in doubt, appearing to have been a failed proposal. The second is that the existing document refers to readers and maintainers, who cannot simply be assumed or willed into existence. Since the present (contested) guidelines refer not simply to broad subject areas, but to broad subject areas that will attract readers and portal maintainers, any specific portal can be shown by observation not to be attracting readers or maintainers.
1605:? If Knowledge is only expected to provide an empty portal, what good is that? It appears that the implication is that Knowledge is expected to provide a portal to a maintainer and to continue to keep the portal facing outward toward the readers whether or not it is being maintained. Portal advocates who think that particular levels of regions "should have" portals should clarify what obligation they are implying and on whom. 1017:: This portal contains basic information about the state but needs updating and improvement. It would be far better to mark this portal as needing updating and improvement rather than simply deleting it. It is far easier to rebuild a portal than to create a portal from scratch, unless you want to delete all portals, which is a whole other issue. For the status of regional portals, see 988:. A theoretical argument could be made that Iowa is a broad topic. I disagree with that theoretical argument (sub-national entities rarely seem to work as portals), but we don't need to rely on theory because we have empirical evidence that in practice this portal does not pass that test: it has not attracted maintainers, and it has not attracted readers. -- 1598:, of which Knowledge is a prominent site, provide a portal? If only that, the government of the nation, state, or province can and almost certainly does provide and maintain a portal in the form of its web site, as do lesser regions such as counties, cantons, districts, communes, cities, towns, townships, boroughs, and villages. 1507:
After a decade of widespread abandonment of portals, hundreds of recent MFDs show that consensus has turned against indefinitely keeping this sort of abandoned junk in the hope that every few years it may get the sort of sporadic update which NA1K promises. It is time for NA1K to stop defending the
1471:
Two newish features of the Wikimedia software means that the article and navboxes offers all the functionality which portals like this set out to offer. Both features are available only to ordinary readers who are not logged in, but you can test them without logging out by right-clicking on a link,
934:
One common method for the design of portals, in use at least since 2005, has involved sometimes large numbers of subpages of the portal, one for each selected article and picture, and sometimes for news items and Do You Know (DYK) items. Often the subpages for selected articles consist of a copy of
1435:
NA1K repeatedly says of abandoned portals that "there is only so much one person can do", and I agree entirely. One person may be able to rush around like a firefighter on amphetamines and push a series of portals over the threshold, but that one person cannot maintain the dozens of portals which
1626:
to implement new portal guidelines, either the old guidelines, or a slightly revised version of the old guidelines, or an entirely new set of guidelines. In that case, advocates of regional portals should be on notice that the new guidelines either should explicitly identify certain subjects that
1168:
This is an asinine deletion request, and as stated above it's just plain lazy. If it needs to be updated than mark it accordingly and see if someone does that first. Also, the smaller states are going to generate less interest. Should we start eliminating other pages related to them because they
1136:
RFC while showing no sign of actually having read it. ENDPOIRTALS was a proposal to delete all portals in one go, and that proposal was rejected. It was not a proposal to keep every abandoned junk portal, and Moxy's repeated pretence that it means something other than what it said is dishonest.
1618:
states that portals should be about broad subject areas that will attract readers and portal maintainers. Portal advocates have focused on the reference to "broad subject areas" and have disregarded the two-part reference to readers and portal maintainers. At present, the status of the portal
1503:
Those new technologies set a high bar for any portal which actually tries to add value for the reader. But this portals fails the basic requirements even of the guidelines written before the new technologies changed the game, and NA1K doesn't even suggest any way in which they intend to avoid
1593:
The first part of the question is: Who is expected to do what in order to provide the portal? Should Knowledge provide and maintain a portal? Should Knowledge provide a portal without maintaining it? Should Knowledge provide a portal, contingent on having a portal maintainer and a portal
1282:
WP:POG is a pariah guideline, it failed to gain consensus support, and masqueraded as a guideline ever since. It has been proven to be hopelessly lax, full of lax, dreamlike statements. It allowed for a free for all mass creation of unsuitable portals. *Not even* meeting WP:POG is a damning
931:. Portals that are not maintained are useless, and, if the information that is facing the reader becomes out-of-date, they are worse than useless, because anyone can edit an article, but heritage portals with subpages contain old copies of articles that require special knowledge to edit. 1402:
The idea that any portal will magically attract maintainers might have made sense a decade ago in the era when the editor base was rapidly growing ... but n 2019, with editor numbers much much lower, it's not just a flight of fancy or magical thinking: it's a straightforward denial of
1475:
mouseover: on any link, mouseover shows you the picture and the start of the lead. So the preview-selected page-function of portals is redundant: something almost as good is available automatically on any navbox or other set of links. Try it by right-clicking on this link to
1058:. Buaidh's comment is just more of the magical thinking which a decade ago saw editors create hundreds of portals on a high-maintenance model ... but a decade later we can see the evidence that there simply aren't enough editors willing and able to maintain this portal. -- 957:
This portal should be deleted without prejudice to re-creating a portal maintained by a volunteer who is willing to invest the time to support a miniature Main Page under the portal guidelines that are in effect at the time, but not involving partial copies to subpages.
1222:
Your main problem is linking a disputed page...so hard to see its weight as it applies here. What do you personally consider a big topic and worthy of keeping or effort to fix ....I take it 15,186 articles is to smal as is 35, 000 as stated in the past.....how
1048:, but the reality is that this is just another of the many hundred of portals which languished for a decade without being improve or updated. It gets too few readers to attract the efforts of editors, so if it is kept it will simply continue to rot. 1627:
are considered portal-worthy even without maintenance, or it can be understood that regional portals, like other subject areas, are only considered to be broad subject areas if they demonstrate that they attract readers and maintainers.
1394:
is risible, and it is demonstrably made in bad faith. As NA1K well knows, very few editors work on portals: they are complex to edit, and have low readership, so editors rightly choose to put their energies elsewhere. That is why the
1369:
XFD decisions should be made on the basis of actual guidelines, not on the basis of one editor's desire to apply the Humpty Dumpty principle that ""When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less."
1584:
wrote: "I consider U.S. states to meet WP:POG guidelines in terms of being broad enough in topical scope to qualify for a portal." Such statements raise a two-part question, having to do with people, and with policies.
1243:
is a longstanding guideline, and the fact that someone has tagged it as disputed does not invalidate it. AS you know, the discussion there is strongly in favour of upholding the clauses which you dislike.
1613:
The second part of the question is how the idea that countries or states "should have" portals should be reflected in Knowledge's policies and guidelines. At present, the page that is designated as the
1381:
In other discussions, NA1K has offered to to do a rapid update of the portal. I note that there is no such offer here, and instead NA1K proposes tagging the portal to ask someone else to do the update.
1103:. It's very concerning that your deleting portal after portal but have no clue how to fix them or to lazy to tag them manually to inform the community that a portal needs updating.. -- 1460:"Portals which require manual updating are at a greater risk of nomination for deletion if they are not kept up to date. Do not expect other editors to maintain a portal you create" 1444: 1399:
of portals which existed a year ago had rotted for years or even for a decade: there are not enough willing maintainers to sustain such a wide number of portals.
1190:
But the bottom line is that issues such as this are not decided by rants but by policy and guidelines, and the fact remains that this portals does not meet the
1439:
NA1K's approach is to preserve portals at any cost, regardless of quality and regardless of whether they are maintained. They objected angrily to populating
1406:
What this portal needs, like other abandoned portals, is not just two hours of rapid update to raise it just above a deletion threshold. what it needs is:
1622:
The other option for the advocates of regional portals, or for anyone who wants to provide better guidelines with regard to portals, would be to publish a
115:. This portal has 10 articles and 5 biographies, but none more recent than 2011. In The News Items are from 2011 and 2012, including the re-election of 1432:
threshold. That approach in article space just left us with perma-stubs, and when applied to portals it just preserves abandoned portals to rot again.
1483:
automatic imagery galleries: clicking on an image brings up an image gallery of all the images on that page. It's full-screen, so it's actually much
954:
not to be attracting readers or a portal maintainer. A portal is a miniature Main Page and requires a substantial investment in volunteer time.
1522: 1268: 1212: 1151: 1072: 1002: 1098: 1425: 928: 94: 17: 1095:"pages that contain unattributed text do not normally need to be deleted. Attribution can be belatedly supplied"...fixit as per 1021:. Our regional portals are dying a slow death. It would be far more humane to kill them all with a single stroke. Yours aye, 90: 1169:
don't generate as much interest? We need more editors to do the work rather than busybodies eliminating what we already have.
1018: 127:
is correctly identified, but that is because the portal is picking that information up from the infobox for the lead article
120: 1428:, which was to preserve some stub on a barely notable topic by adding a few sourced factoids which brought it just over the 1448: 1339:
template. Then notify relevant Wikiprojects that the portal would benefit from updating. I consider U.S. states to meet
1031: 82: 1374:
is an admin, and should know better than to try reducing this discussion to Alice in Wonderland, so I hope that the
1652: 1632: 1518: 1264: 1208: 1147: 1068: 998: 963: 40: 1544: 1312:. Fails the objectives of a portal (it doesn’t help anyone with anything). Redundant to the parent article. — 1364:"broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers" 1252:"broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers" 1196:"broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers" 1127:"broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers" 1056:"broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers" 986:"broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers" 1602: 1412:
a complete overhaul to avoid replicating the functionality provided by the new wiki technologies (see below)
1636: 1565: 1548: 1527: 1468:. Not updated once in a drive-by-session, but regularly maintained. NA1K is not even offering to do that. 1349: 1321: 1292: 1273: 1232: 1217: 1178: 1156: 1112: 1077: 1035: 1007: 967: 63: 1487:
than a click-for-next image gallery on a portal. Try it by right-clicking on this link to the article
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below.
1648: 1581: 1421: 1371: 1345: 1174: 36: 1237:
Moxy, you are either being very childish or have exceedingly low comprehension skills. Or maybe both.
1601:
If Knowledge is expected to provide and maintain a portal, how can that obligation be reconciled with
1358:
NA1K's personal view of the guidelines is not supported by the long-standing text of the guidelines.
1628: 1561: 1509: 1440: 1429: 1255: 1199: 1138: 1133: 1059: 989: 959: 58: 1540: 1317: 1288: 1477: 1497: 1254:... so a portal with a scope of a billion articles fails if it lacks readers and maintainers. -- 1089:: no valid reason for deletion -this odd rationale will have every portal gone.....read over 939:
and is not permitted. Some other design approach for portals should be used in the future.
1472:
and the select "open in private window" (in Firefox) or "open in incognito window" (Chrome).
1343:
guidelines in terms of being broad enough in topical scope to qualify for a portal. Cheers,
1170: 1028: 124: 86: 1647:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
1557: 1388: 1333: 376:
Editor edits sporadically. News is obsolete. 4 articles and 1 bio, last updated in 2008.
264:
Originator inactive since 2011. Two biographies. Two articles. Last maintained in 2008.
53: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
1313: 1284: 1225: 1105: 776:
Originator last edited in 2011. One featured article at a time without other articles.
1539:- The portal needs updating and editors seem to be willing to work on improvements. - 1623: 1615: 1455: 1359: 1340: 1247: 1240: 1191: 1122: 1091: 1051: 981: 112: 1595: 950: 116: 1366:. Per the evidence above this one has not attracted either readers or maintainers. 1246:
As you well know, the breadth of a topic is not defined solely by article count.
1576:
Some editors have stated that particular levels of regions should have portals.
1491:, open in a private/incognito tab, and click on any image to start the slideshow 1022: 556:
Originator inactive since 2010. No maintenance since 2010, except news is 2016.
77: 69: 1577: 889:
Originator edits sporadically. Last maintained in 2012 except for AWB tweaks.
1132:
It is risible to the point of disruptiveness that Moxy continues to cite the
1488: 1099:
Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)#RfC: Ending the system of portals take 2
1556:
worthless junk portal, one selected article and 5 selected 5 biographies.
944: 936: 867:
After correction for renaming. (Total of 39 pageviews in two months.)
512:
Originator inactive since 2007. Has had some maintenance since then.
1580:
wrote (in April, in an MFD): "all countries should have portals".
330:
5 articles and 3 bios, last updated in 2008. Last tweaked in 2016.
111:
This is an unmaintained and little-viewed portal on a state of the
927:
A complete listing of state portals with metrics can be seen at
822:
Selected biography out of date. Last updates appear to be 2011.
128: 1643:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1443:
because it was "being used by deletionists". They propose the
134:
The following is a listing of the least-viewed state portals:
948:
to be a broad subject area, but this portal has been shown
353:
Originator inactive since 2012. No maintenance since 2010.
308:
Originator inactive since 2011. No maintenance since 2011.
195:
No maintenance since 2008. Two articles. Two biographies.
1480:, open in a private/incognito tab, and mouseover any link. 1424:
is bringing here the approach used in their days with the
241:
Originator inactive since 2010. Last maintenance in 2008.
1187:
Fine rant, Farragutful. Hope you feel better after that.
1498:
available since 2015 to users of Knowledge's Android app
912:
Originator inactive since 2016. Last maintenance 2011.
799:
Originator inactive since 2007. Last maintenance 2009.
422:
Originator inactive since 2013. Last maintenance 2009.
172:
Originator inactive since 2011. Not mained since 2007.
102: 98: 1451:, because they prefer not to identify abandon portals. 445:
Originator banned. Selected pages same as in 2007.
1384:The that a solution lies in tagging a portal with 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1655:). No further edits should be made to this page. 942:A state of the United States may be considered 8: 1129:. This portal does not meet that criterion. 136: 1194:requirement that portals should be about 1504:duplicating the new built-in features. 1362:requires that portals should be about 1250:requires that portals should be about 1125:requires that portals should be about 1054:requires that portals should be about 1045: 984:requires that portals should be about 7: 48:The result of the discussion was: 1378:will discount this flight of fancy. 1449:Category:Abandoned country portals 24: 1609:Impact on Policies and Guidelines 18:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion 976:. Yet another abandoned portal. 1121:Moxy, the valid reason is that 845:Originator inactive since 2009. 754:Originator inactive since 2013. 732:Originator inactive since 2007. 666:Originator inactive since 2016. 644:Originator inactive since 2018. 622:Originator inactive since 2012. 600:Originator inactive since 2014. 490:Originator inactive since 2009. 1019:User:Buaidh/Geographic portals 710:Originator inactive since 2013 121:President of the United States 1: 1603:Knowledge is not compulsory 1496:Similar features have been 1675: 1594:maintenance plan? Should 1426:WP:Article Rescue Squadron 929:WP:US State Portal Metrics 578:No maintenance since 2010. 399:No maintenance since 2011. 218:No maintenance since 2010. 1566:19:57, 26 July 2019 (UTC) 1549:17:42, 11 July 2019 (UTC) 1436:have no other maintainer. 1036:17:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC) 1008:17:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC) 968:04:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC) 467:Last article update 2012. 64:07:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC) 1645:Please do not modify it. 1637:05:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC) 1528:15:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 1350:12:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 1322:10:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 1293:11:25, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 1274:00:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 1233:22:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 1218:16:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 1179:15:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 1157:16:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 1113:09:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 1078:16:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC) 1046:updating and improvement 32:Please do not modify it. 1044:It's easy to write of 688:Being reworked by MJL. 1582:User:Northamerica1000 1624:Request for Comments 1458:has said since 2006 1441:Category:All portals 1589:Who Should Do What? 1462:. Note that phrase 1415:ongoing maintenance 1478:Template:Wisconsin 146:Article Page Views 1616:Portal Guidelines 1526: 1465:"kept up to date" 1329:and tag with the 1272: 1216: 1155: 1076: 1006: 925: 924: 143:Portal Page Views 1666: 1572:Regional Portals 1517: 1515: 1513: 1445:propose deletion 1422:Northamerica1000 1393: 1387: 1372:Northamerica1000 1348: 1338: 1332: 1263: 1261: 1259: 1231: 1228: 1207: 1205: 1203: 1146: 1144: 1142: 1111: 1108: 1067: 1065: 1063: 1034: 1025: 997: 995: 993: 137: 125:Governor of Iowa 107: 106: 61: 56: 34: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1659: 1653:deletion review 1629:Robert McClenon 1611: 1591: 1574: 1511: 1510: 1391: 1385: 1344: 1336: 1330: 1257: 1256: 1229: 1224: 1201: 1200: 1140: 1139: 1109: 1104: 1101: 1061: 1060: 1027: 1023: 991: 990: 960:Robert McClenon 836:Georgia (state) 80: 76: 73: 60:| confabulate _ 59: 54: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1672: 1670: 1661: 1658: 1657: 1610: 1607: 1590: 1587: 1573: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1551: 1541:Knowledgekid87 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1505: 1501: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1481: 1469: 1452: 1437: 1433: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1404: 1400: 1382: 1379: 1367: 1353: 1352: 1324: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1277: 1276: 1244: 1188: 1182: 1181: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1130: 1116: 1115: 1097: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1049: 1039: 1038: 1011: 1010: 978: 977: 923: 922: 919: 916: 913: 910: 907: 904: 900: 899: 896: 893: 890: 887: 884: 881: 877: 876: 874: 871: 868: 865: 862: 859: 855: 854: 852: 849: 846: 843: 840: 837: 833: 832: 829: 826: 823: 820: 817: 814: 810: 809: 806: 803: 800: 797: 794: 791: 787: 786: 783: 780: 777: 774: 771: 768: 767:North Carolina 764: 763: 761: 758: 755: 752: 749: 746: 742: 741: 739: 736: 733: 730: 727: 724: 720: 719: 717: 714: 711: 708: 705: 702: 698: 697: 695: 692: 689: 686: 683: 680: 676: 675: 673: 670: 667: 664: 661: 658: 654: 653: 651: 648: 645: 642: 639: 636: 632: 631: 629: 626: 623: 620: 617: 614: 610: 609: 607: 604: 601: 598: 595: 592: 588: 587: 585: 582: 579: 576: 573: 570: 566: 565: 563: 560: 557: 554: 551: 548: 544: 543: 541: 538: 535: 533: 530: 527: 523: 522: 519: 516: 513: 510: 507: 504: 500: 499: 497: 494: 491: 488: 485: 482: 478: 477: 474: 471: 468: 465: 462: 459: 455: 454: 452: 449: 446: 443: 440: 437: 433: 432: 429: 426: 423: 420: 417: 414: 413:South Carolina 410: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 394: 391: 387: 386: 383: 380: 377: 374: 371: 368: 364: 363: 360: 357: 354: 351: 348: 345: 341: 340: 337: 334: 331: 328: 325: 322: 318: 317: 315: 312: 309: 306: 303: 300: 296: 295: 293: 290: 287: 285: 282: 279: 275: 274: 271: 268: 265: 262: 259: 256: 252: 251: 248: 245: 242: 239: 236: 233: 229: 228: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 206: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 183: 182: 179: 176: 173: 170: 167: 164: 160: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 109: 108: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1671: 1662: 1656: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1625: 1620: 1617: 1608: 1606: 1604: 1599: 1597: 1588: 1586: 1583: 1579: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1529: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1506: 1502: 1499: 1495: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1479: 1474: 1473: 1470: 1467: 1466: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1431: 1430:WP:Notability 1427: 1423: 1419: 1414: 1411: 1408: 1407: 1405: 1401: 1398: 1390: 1383: 1380: 1377: 1376:closing admin 1373: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1351: 1347: 1346:North America 1342: 1335: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1283:indictment. — 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1275: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1227: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1158: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1135: 1134:WP:ENDPORTALS 1131: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1114: 1107: 1102: 1100: 1094: 1093: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1057: 1053: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1037: 1033: 1030: 1026: 1020: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1004: 1000: 996: 987: 983: 980: 979: 975: 972: 971: 970: 969: 965: 961: 955: 953: 952: 947: 946: 940: 938: 932: 930: 920: 917: 914: 911: 908: 905: 902: 901: 897: 894: 891: 888: 885: 882: 879: 878: 875: 872: 869: 866: 863: 860: 857: 856: 853: 850: 847: 844: 841: 838: 835: 834: 830: 827: 824: 821: 818: 815: 812: 811: 807: 804: 801: 798: 795: 792: 789: 788: 784: 781: 778: 775: 772: 769: 766: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 743: 740: 737: 734: 731: 728: 725: 722: 721: 718: 715: 712: 709: 706: 703: 700: 699: 696: 693: 690: 687: 684: 681: 678: 677: 674: 671: 668: 665: 662: 659: 656: 655: 652: 649: 646: 643: 640: 637: 634: 633: 630: 627: 624: 621: 618: 615: 612: 611: 608: 605: 602: 599: 596: 593: 590: 589: 586: 583: 580: 577: 574: 571: 568: 567: 564: 561: 558: 555: 552: 549: 546: 545: 542: 539: 536: 534: 531: 528: 525: 524: 520: 517: 514: 511: 508: 505: 502: 501: 498: 495: 492: 489: 486: 483: 480: 479: 475: 472: 469: 466: 463: 460: 457: 456: 453: 450: 447: 444: 441: 438: 435: 434: 430: 427: 424: 421: 418: 415: 412: 411: 407: 404: 401: 398: 395: 392: 389: 388: 384: 381: 378: 375: 372: 369: 366: 365: 361: 358: 355: 352: 349: 346: 343: 342: 338: 335: 332: 329: 326: 323: 320: 319: 316: 313: 310: 307: 304: 301: 299:West Virginia 298: 297: 294: 291: 288: 286: 283: 280: 277: 276: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 257: 254: 253: 249: 246: 243: 240: 237: 234: 231: 230: 226: 223: 220: 217: 214: 211: 208: 207: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 186:New Hampshire 185: 184: 180: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 161: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 138: 135: 132: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 113:United States 104: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 79: 75: 74: 71: 68: 66: 65: 62: 57: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1660: 1644: 1642: 1621: 1612: 1600: 1596:the Internet 1592: 1575: 1553: 1536: 1484: 1464: 1463: 1459: 1454:The lead of 1396: 1375: 1363: 1326: 1309: 1251: 1195: 1165: 1126: 1096: 1090: 1086: 1055: 1014: 985: 973: 956: 951:a posteriori 949: 943: 941: 933: 926: 458:Rhode Island 209:South Dakota 163:North Dakota 133: 117:Barack Obama 110: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 1171:Farragutful 679:Connecticut 613:Mississippi 78:Portal:Iowa 70:Portal:Iowa 55:‑Scottywong 1578:User:Kusma 1558:Catfurball 1514:HairedGirl 1260:HairedGirl 1204:HairedGirl 1143:HairedGirl 1064:HairedGirl 994:HairedGirl 858:Washington 745:New Mexico 1649:talk page 1489:Wisconsin 1314:SmokeyJoe 1285:SmokeyJoe 903:Tennessee 723:Louisiana 635:Minnesota 481:Wisconsin 158:Articles 37:talk page 1651:or in a 1523:contribs 1508:junk. -- 1409:updating 1403:reality. 1397:majority 1269:contribs 1213:contribs 1152:contribs 1073:contribs 1032:contribs 1003:contribs 945:a priori 937:copyleft 813:Missouri 701:Michigan 657:Maryland 569:Kentucky 503:Oklahoma 436:Delaware 344:Nebraska 149:Comments 39:or in a 1024:Buaidh 547:Indiana 367:Wyoming 321:Vermont 232:Montana 155:Percent 123:. The 91:history 1554:Delete 1519:(talk) 1485:better 1456:WP:POG 1389:update 1360:WP:POG 1341:WP:POG 1334:Update 1310:Delete 1265:(talk) 1248:WP:POG 1241:WP:POG 1223:big?-- 1209:(talk) 1192:WP:POG 1148:(talk) 1123:WP:POG 1092:WP:RIA 1069:(talk) 1052:WP:POG 999:(talk) 982:WP:POG 974:Delete 915:165.11 892:376.39 880:Alaska 870:228.29 848:240.47 825:201.41 802:178.56 779:234.19 757:208.25 735:199.13 713:244.50 691:194.31 669:221.00 647:252.33 625:195.50 603:200.93 591:Kansas 581:209.07 559:199.07 537:185.71 526:Nevada 515:208.31 493:240.92 470:230.00 448:206.92 425:200.75 402:228.73 379:337.55 356:292.90 333:208.10 311:264.40 289:299.90 267:264.11 244:420.67 221:215.75 198:299.25 175:233.63 1512:Brown 1258:Brown 1202:Brown 1141:Brown 1062:Brown 992:Brown 918:0.61% 895:0.27% 873:0.44% 851:0.42% 828:0.50% 805:0.56% 782:0.43% 760:0.48% 738:0.50% 716:0.41% 694:0.51% 672:0.45% 650:0.40% 628:0.51% 606:0.50% 584:0.48% 562:0.50% 540:0.54% 518:0.48% 496:0.42% 473:0.43% 451:0.48% 428:0.50% 405:0.44% 382:0.30% 359:0.34% 336:0.48% 314:0.38% 292:0.33% 278:Maine 270:0.38% 255:Idaho 247:0.24% 224:0.46% 201:0.33% 178:0.43% 152:Ratio 140:Title 99:watch 95:links 16:< 1633:talk 1562:talk 1545:talk 1537:Keep 1327:Keep 1318:talk 1289:talk 1226:Moxy 1198:. -- 1175:talk 1166:Keep 1106:Moxy 1087:Keep 1029:talk 1015:Keep 964:talk 909:2972 886:6775 864:3881 842:4088 819:3424 796:2857 790:Utah 773:3747 751:3332 729:3186 707:3912 685:3109 663:3315 641:3785 619:2737 597:2813 575:2927 553:2787 532:2600 509:2708 487:3132 464:2760 442:2483 419:2409 396:2516 390:Iowa 373:3713 350:2929 327:2081 305:2644 284:2999 261:2377 238:3786 215:1726 192:2394 169:1869 131:. 129:Iowa 103:logs 87:talk 83:edit 1521:• ( 1447:of 1267:• ( 1211:• ( 1150:• ( 1071:• ( 1001:• ( 921:11 898:28 831:41 808:46 521:63 476:24 408:15 250:12 181:12 119:as 1635:) 1564:) 1547:) 1392:}} 1386:{{ 1337:}} 1331:{{ 1320:) 1291:) 1230:🍁 1177:) 1137:-- 1110:🍁 966:) 906:18 883:18 861:17 839:17 816:17 793:16 785:1 770:16 748:16 726:16 704:16 682:16 660:15 638:15 616:14 594:14 572:14 550:14 529:14 506:13 484:13 461:12 439:12 431:4 416:12 393:11 385:5 370:11 362:2 347:10 339:8 324:10 302:10 281:10 273:4 227:6 204:4 101:| 97:| 93:| 89:| 85:| 52:. 1631:( 1560:( 1543:( 1525:) 1500:. 1420:@ 1370:@ 1316:( 1287:( 1271:) 1215:) 1173:( 1154:) 1075:) 1005:) 962:( 258:9 235:9 212:8 189:8 166:8 105:) 81:(

Index

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion
talk page
deletion review
‑Scottywong
| confabulate _
07:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Portal:Iowa
Portal:Iowa
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
United States
Barack Obama
President of the United States
Governor of Iowa
Iowa
WP:US State Portal Metrics
copyleft
a priori
a posteriori
Robert McClenon
talk
04:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
WP:POG
BrownHairedGirl
(talk)
contribs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑