241:
makes it clear that
Knowledge (XXG) pages are not for polemical statements. Perhaps most males feel very comfortable with their status and may not be offended but we can't assume that of everyone. Deciding it should be kept because it does not offend you personally sort of misses the point. Reverse
85:
I have nominated this userbox for deletion because of the following concern: intended to be a gender double standard and dishonest opinion. If it is unacceptable to have a userbox stating male superiority, then it should be unacceptable to have a userbox stating female superiority. Gender double
259:
I am a bit surprised to see how this is going. If it was claiming men were superior to woman, or that whites were superior to blacks then I don't think it would be going the same way. There seems to be a double standard where sexism against men is considered harmless.
213:
72:
101:
I agree. I do not believe that there should be any userboxes on
Knowledge (XXG) that would promote any kind of discrimination, including that against men. I think this userbox should be deleted.
55:. Chillum said it best: while I am not personally offended by it, it is still a divisive and inflammatory userbox. Such userboxes are not allowed on Knowledge (XXG). I am sorry if you liked it. —
297:. This a neutral statement of opinion. While the opinion itself is not neutral, allowing editors to state it benefits the encyclopedia by documenting their potential biases.
347:
330:
309:
289:
268:
250:
229:
191:
172:
152:
134:
110:
95:
68:
338:
My lack of offense to this doesn't make this inoffensive. There seems little upshot in keeping the box, with plenty of potential downsides.
118:
17:
79:
23:
91:
362:
43:
106:
64:
361:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
87:
42:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
189:
102:
36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below.
304:
168:
343:
326:
148:
207:
285:
261:
243:
182:
123:
238:
300:
164:
160:
339:
322:
60:
237:
Perhaps this was meant in jest, but if taken literally it is basically offensive sexism.
227:
144:
200:
281:
318:
242:
the male and female roles in this userbox of its offensiveness becomes clear.
56:
222:
321:? Are they superior to both, inferior to both, or somewhere in the middle?
24:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Politics
280:
Unless, of course, we would bar songs from "Annie Get Your Gun"?
355:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
221:
Was there a male superiority userbox/MFD? can someone link it? –
180:- I'm a male, and I'm not offended by this whatsoever. –
86:standards have been an issue to others and myself.
46:). No further edits should be made to this page.
80:User:King Sweaterhead/Userboxes/Female Superiority
365:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
117:This MfD nomination was incomplete (missing
18:Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion
7:
31:
199:I'm in the same boat as Julian. -
51:The result of the discussion was
88:Decimus Tedius Regio Zanarukando
53:delete as CSD G10 (attack page)
1:
139:I agree with the nominator -
385:
230:23:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
214:22:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
212:16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC
192:21:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
173:21:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
153:18:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
135:16:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
111:18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
96:02:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
358:Please do not modify it.
348:17:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
331:13:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
310:23:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
290:01:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
269:13:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
251:00:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
69:05:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
39:Please do not modify it.
161:Knowledge (XXG):CSD#G10
121:). It is listed now. –
73:Closing instructions
209:The Vulcan Overlord
131:
127:
103:Jprulestheworld01
22:(Redirected from
376:
360:
308:
266:
248:
210:
205:
185:
129:
125:
75:
41:
27:
384:
383:
379:
378:
377:
375:
374:
373:
369:
363:deletion review
356:
317:what about the
298:
262:
244:
208:
201:
183:
83:
71:
44:deletion review
37:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
382:
380:
371:
368:
367:
351:
350:
333:
319:transgenderers
312:
292:
274:
273:
272:
271:
254:
253:
232:
216:
194:
175:
155:
137:
114:
113:
82:
77:
49:
48:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
381:
372:
366:
364:
359:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
313:
311:
306:
302:
296:
293:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
275:
270:
267:
265:
258:
257:
256:
255:
252:
249:
247:
240:
236:
233:
231:
228:
226:
225:
220:
217:
215:
211:
206:
204:
198:
195:
193:
190:
187:
186:
179:
176:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
158:Speedy delete
156:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
136:
133:
132:
120:
116:
115:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
98:
97:
93:
89:
81:
78:
76:
74:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
47:
45:
40:
34:
33:
25:
19:
370:
357:
354:
335:
314:
294:
277:
263:
245:
234:
223:
218:
202:
196:
184:Juliancolton
181:
177:
157:
140:
122:
84:
52:
50:
38:
35:
301:Gavia immer
165:Otterathome
340:Matt Deres
323:MickMacNee
219:Question:
145:Thryduulf
203:T'Shael,
315:Comment
282:Collect
264:Chillum
246:Chillum
239:WP:USER
336:Delete
235:Delete
141:delete
119:step 3
130:ALCON
65:cool!
57:harej
16:<
344:talk
327:talk
305:talk
295:Keep
286:talk
278:Keep
224:xeno
197:Keep
178:Keep
169:talk
149:talk
126:LACK
107:talk
92:talk
61:talk
163:.--
63:) (
346:)
329:)
299:—
288:)
188:|
171:)
151:)
143:.
109:)
94:)
67:)
342:(
325:(
307:)
303:(
284:(
167:(
147:(
128:F
124:B
105:(
90:(
59:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.