1867:) do not qualify. Significant reviews are where the author has personally experienced or tested the product and describes their experiences in some depth, provides broader context, and draws comparisons with other products. Reviews that narrowly focus on a particular product or function without broader context (e.g. review of a particular meal without description of the restaurant as a whole) do not count as significant sources. Reviews that are too generic or vague to make the determination whether the author had personal experience with the reviewed product are not to be counted as significant sources. Further, the reviews must be published outside of purely local or narrow (highly specialized) interest publications (see also
1722:) is still one source (one newspaper article). If multiple journalists at multiple newspapers separately and independently write about the same subject, then each of these unrelated articles should be considered separate sources, even if they are writing about the same event or "story". A series of articles by the same journalist is still treated as one source (one person). The appearance of different articles in the same newspaper is still one source (one publisher). Similarly, a series of books by the same author is one source.
922:
1044:
990:
970:
942:
912:
884:
854:
823:
813:
803:
46:
329:. The scope of this guideline covers all groups of people organized together for a purpose with the exception of non-profit educational institutions, religions or sects, and sports teams. If another subject-specific notability guideline applies to a group, it may be notable by passing either this or the more specific guideline. For example, bands are covered by
1737:(greater availability of English and Western sources) when discussing organizations in the developing world. Therefore, for example, a Bangladeshi women's rights organization from the 1960s might establish notability with just one or two quality sources, while the same is not true for a tech start-up in a major U.S. metropolitan area.
125:
1010:
1000:
980:
952:
932:
894:
874:
864:
833:
793:
1504:(or functional independence): the author must be unrelated to the company, organization, or product. Related persons include organization's personnel, owners, investors, (sub)contractors, vendors, distributors, suppliers, other business partners and associates, customers, competitors, sponsors and sponsorees (including
2468:. Since there is generally very little to say about individual stores or franchises that is not true for the chain in general, Knowledge (XXG) should not have articles on such individual stores. In rare cases, an individual location will have architectural peculiarities that makes it notable, such as the
1162:
Sources are not transferable or attributable between related parties. Sources that describe only a specific topic related to an organization should not be regarded as providing significant coverage of that organization. Therefore, for example, an article on a product recall or a biography of a CEO is
1108:
The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to establish notability. Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product,
530:
An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it. A corporation is not notable merely because it owns notable subsidiaries. The organization or corporation itself must have been discussed in reliable independent sources for it to be considered notable.
1133:
in some depth the treatment of the employees or major changes in leadership instead of just listing the fact that the corporation employs 500 people or mentioning that John Smith was appointed as the new CEO. Further, the significance is not determined by the reputation of the source. For example, a
1755:
Reliable sources, generally, are third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments. The greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues,
480:
When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please consider whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. Large organizations and their products are likely to have
1851:
Product, event, and restaurant reviews (i.e. where author describes personal opinions and experiences) must be handled with great care and diligence. Some types of reviews have a longer history and established traditions (e.g. restaurants, wine, books, movies), while other (e.g. new tech gadgets,
489:
that provide evidence of notability. However, smaller organizations and their products can be notable, just as individuals can be notable. Arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations or their products, though articles about very small "garage" or local
1786:
provides an author's own thinking based on primary sources, generally at least one step removed from an event. It contains an author's analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources. Secondary sources are not necessarily
1128:
of the content that governs. A collection of multiple trivial sources does not become significant. Views, hits, likes, shares, etc. have no bearing on establishing whether the coverage is significant. Similarly, arbitrary statistics and numbers (such as number of employees, amount of revenue or
1431:
will have a number of significant sources discussing its (alleged) illegal conduct. Sources that primarily discuss purely such conduct cannot be used to establish an organization's notability under this guideline. However, the organization may still be notable, in whole or in part due to such
2368:
in the U.S. does not necessarily mean that the religious organization that owns or meets in the building is notable. However, it is possible that both the building and the institution are notable independently from each other – in which case, a combined article about the institution and the
1886:
include reviews where the reviewed product is provided free of charge to the author. Often, sponsored nature of a review is not disclosed and not immediately apparent. In particular, a strong indication of a sponsored or other relationship is a review that is excessively positive or negative.
2430:
and other comparable international stock exchanges, are inherently notable. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this (or any other) case. However, sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies, so that notability can be established using the primary
2395:
Some commercial organizations meet
Knowledge (XXG) notability guidelines but care must be taken in determining whether they are truly notable and whether the article is an attempt to use Knowledge (XXG) for free advertising. Knowledge (XXG) editors should not create articles on commercial
747:
The court filing is significant and reliable (in that the court record is a verified account of a legal action being taken) – but not secondary (court filings are primary sources) or independent (they are written by the parties to the legal action, which have a vested interest in the
534:
This works the other way as well. An organization may be notable, but individual members (or groups of members) do not "inherit" notability due to their membership. A corporation may be notable, but its subsidiaries do not "inherit" notability from being owned by the corporation.
2530:. In cases where a company is mainly known for a single series of products or services, it is usually better to cover the company and its products/services in the same article. This article can be the name of the company or the name of its product, depending on which is the
2212:
of an article about the parent organization. If the parent article grows to the point where information needs to be split off to a new article, remember that when you split off an article about a local chapter, the local chapter itself must comply with
Knowledge (XXG)'s
2160:
The organization's longevity, size of membership, major achievements, prominent scandals, or other factors specific to the organization should be considered to the extent that these factors have been reported by independent sources. This list is not exhaustive and not
2238:
Individual chapters, divisions, departments, and other sub-units of notable organizations are only rarely notable enough to warrant a separate article. Information on chapters and affiliates should normally be merged into the article about the parent organization.
1725:
The existence of multiple significant independent sources needs to be demonstrated. Hypothetical sources (e.g. "the company is big/old/important so there must be more sources, I just don't have/can't find them") do not count towards the notability requirement.
2307:
All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations (i.e., this page),
2624:
Although an organization that fails to meet the criteria of this guideline should not have a separate article, information about the organization may nevertheless be included in other ways in
Knowledge (XXG) provided that certain conditions are met.
2431:
criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage and analyst reports. Accordingly, article authors should make sure to seek out such coverage and add references to such articles to properly establish notability.
1700:"Source" on Knowledge (XXG) can refer to the work itself, the author of the work, and/or the publisher of the work. For notability purposes, sources must be unrelated to each other to be "multiple". A story from a single news organization (such as
1285:
inclusion in collections that have indiscriminate inclusion criteria (i.e. attempt to include every existing item instead of selecting the best, most notable examples), such as databases, archives, directories, dictionaries, bibliographies, certain
2657:
For organizations local to a city, town, or county, content conforming to the above criteria may be added to articles for that locale. For example, a business that is significant to the history or economy of a small town might be described in the
2472:; however, a series of articles on every single Wal-Mart in China would not be informative. An exception can be made if a major event occurred at a local store; however, this would most likely be created under an article name that describes the
617:
with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources to prevent gaming of the rules by marketing and public relations professionals. The guideline, among other things, is meant to address some of the common issues with abusing
Knowledge (XXG) for
1794:
is original material that is close to an event, and is often an account written by people who are directly involved. Primary sources cannot be used to establish notability. In a business setting, frequently encountered primary sources include:
1515:(or intellectual independence): the content must not be produced by interested parties. Often a related party produces a narrative that is then copied, regurgitated, and published in whole or in part by independent parties (as exemplified by
2576:
This guideline does not apply to transport infrastructure such as railway lines and stations, airports, and toll roads, even when the company running the installation has that task as its single purpose. Other notability guidelines such as
2825:
A feature story is usually a longer article where the writer has researched and interviewed to tell a factual story about a person, place, event, idea, or issue. Features are not opinion-driven and are more in-depth than traditional news
1552:
If a source's independence is in any doubt, it is better to exercise caution and exclude it from determining quality sources for the purposes of establishing notability. If contested, consensus on the use of sources can be sought at the
2710:
2172:
international. Example: a tiny fraternal organization with a total membership of sixty members, worldwide, is not "international in scale" simply because the members live in separate countries and have formed sub-chapters where they
1891:
from sources with well established reputation for independence and objectivity. Further, reviews that simply regurgitate someone else's opinion are also not independent sources unless enough original work was put in to produce a
1396:
from local media (e.g., the weekly newspaper for a small town), or media of limited interest and circulation (e.g., a newsletter exclusively for people with a very unusual job), is not an indication of notability. At least
1548:
must be used with great care. While feature stories from leading trade magazines may be used where independence is clear, there is a presumption against the use of coverage in trade magazines to establish notability.
531:
Examples: If a notable person buys a restaurant, the restaurant does not "inherit" notability from its owner. If a notable person joins an organization, the organization does not "inherit" notability from its member.
1163:
a significant coverage for the
Knowledge (XXG) article on the product or the CEO, but not a significant coverage on the company (unless the article or biography devotes significant attention to the company itself).
2217:
guidelines, without reference to the notability of the parent organization. Take care not to split off a section that would be considered non-notable on its own. Splitting should occur as a top-down process. See
739:
The tech blog review is significant and secondary – but may not be independent (blog posts are often sponsored) and is not reliable (self-published sources are generally not reliable, unless they are written by
2148:
Some organizations are local in scope, but have achieved national or even international notice. Organizations whose activities are local in scope (e.g., a school or club) can be considered notable if there is
1900:). If the suitability of a source is in doubt, it is better to exercise caution and to exclude the source for the purposes of establishing notability. Once notability is established, non-independent reviews
2153:
by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area. Where coverage is only local in scope, consider adding a section on the organization to an article on the organization's local area
473:. "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance". No matter how "important" editors may personally believe an organization to be, it should not have a stand-alone article in Knowledge (XXG)
1109:
company, or organization. Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than a
411:
Knowledge (XXG) bases its decision about whether an organization is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the organization or product has attracted the notice of
1277:
as an example of a type of company or product being discussed (e.g. "In response to the protests, various companies, such as Acme Inc, have pledged to address working conditions in their factories")
2434:
Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high (but not
622:. As such, the guideline establishes generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability than for sources that are allowed as acceptable references within an article.
1664:
other works in which the company, corporation, organization, or group talks about itself—whether published by itself, or re-printed by other people (for example, self-submitted biographies to
69:
2715:
1907:
Be reliable: The reviews must be published in reliable sources that provide editorial oversight and strive to maintain objectivity. Self-published reviews (e.g. most blogs) do not qualify.
1476:
in the subject have actually considered the company, corporation, product or service notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial, non-routine works that focus upon it.
2356:
Individual religious organizations (whether called congregations, synods, synagogues, temples, churches, etc.) must meet the notability guideline for organizations and companies or the
717:
blog by a non-staff contributor; a blog post by a tech enthusiast who has provided a review of the product; and a court filing by a competitor alleging patent infringement. Analysis:
693:
such sources to establish notability. If the suitability of a source is in doubt, it is better to exercise caution and exclude the source for the purposes of establishing notability.
2047:
These criteria constitute an optional, alternative method for demonstrating notability. Organizations are considered notable if they meet one of the following sourcing requirements
1565:
648:
Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability:
2469:
2426:
There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the
1018:
Court filings are primary sources. While we hope they will be truthful, court filings are written by the company (or its opponents in court), so they are not independent.
689:
of these criteria to be counted towards establishing notability; each source needs to be significant, independent, reliable, and secondary. In addition, there must also be
2164:
Caveat – Be cautious of claims that small organizations are national or international in scale. The fact that an organization has branches in multiple countries does not
281:
286:
2262:
1760:
are those that have a poor reputation for checking the facts, lack meaningful editorial oversight, or have an apparent conflict of interest. Self-published sources,
732:
blog profile is significant and secondary – but not independent or reliable (most such posts are company-sponsored or based on a company's marketing materials - see
2747:
2201:
As a general rule, the individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not considered notable enough to warrant a separate article –
336:
Simply stated, an organization is a group of more than one person formed together for a purpose. This includes commercial and non-commercial activities, such as
192:
2045:
No organization is considered notable except to the extent that independent sources demonstrate that it has been noticed by people outside of the organization.
216:
312:
2538:
the company and its products into separate articles, unless both have so much coverage in reliable secondary sources as to make a single article unwieldy.
2266:
2208:
In some cases, a specific local chapter or sub-organization that is not considered notable enough for its own article may be significant enough to mention
2859:
2675:
2250:
53:
2731:
2835:
Patents are written and published solely at the direction of the inventor or organization that the inventor assigned the patent to. Their contents are
2720:
2032:
1976:
1519:). Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and
1299:
other listings and mentions not accompanied by commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization.
1963:
1765:
1554:
375:
This guideline does not cover small groups of closely related people such as families, entertainment groups, co-authors, and co-inventors covered by
2726:
1129:
raised capital, age of the company, etc.) do not make the coverage significant. For the coverage to be significant, the sources must describe and
752:
Therefore, the article does not have a single source that could be used to establish the notability of the company, let alone multiple sources.
325:
This page is to help determine whether an organization (commercial or otherwise), or any of its products and services, is a valid subject for a
1473:
2753:
31:
1962:
if no notable content remains. However, if an article contains only blatant advertising, with no other useful content, it may be tagged per
1729:
The word "multiple" is not a set number and depends on the type of organization or product. Editors should recognize certain biases, such as
2840:
2736:
424:—even if these sources are not actually listed in the article yet (though in most cases it probably would improve the article to add them).
2365:
2075:
1904:
be used to verify some non-controversial facts in the article (e.g. number of employees, number of tables in a restaurant, product models).
1636:, and other publications that accept public contributions and that do not provide meaningful editorial oversight of the submitted content,
1575:
for the verifiability and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material.
2019:—generally cannot be used, as they do not provide coverage that can be considered "independent" from their subject for the purposes of
185:
2361:
2253:
in the main article on the organization. If an embedded list becomes too large for the parent article, consideration may be given to
725:
article is reliable, independent, and secondary – but not significant (a single-sentence mention in an article about another company).
1959:
35:
1757:
1225:
of event schedules or results (such as theater performance schedule, score table of a sporting event, listing of award recipients),
228:
711:
while pointing out a missing feature in a rival's product when compared to the product by Acme; an extensive company profile in a
145:. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be
2464:
Many companies have chains of local stores or franchises that are individually pretty much interchangeable—for instance, a local
305:
2650:
2134:
1764:, are generally not accepted as evidence of notability. For a full discussion on what is and what is not a reliable source, see
960:
Blog posts are often sponsored and self-published sources are generally not reliable unless written by a subject-matter expert.
459:
376:
247:
242:
204:
151:
If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then
Knowledge (XXG) should not have an article on it.
2477:
1608:
including pieces like "case studies" or "success stories" by
Chambers of Commerce, business incubators, consulting firms, etc.
223:
209:
199:
2864:
276:
2545:
that are produced and/or marketed by the same company, avoid creating multiple stubs about each individual product (e.g.,
1388:
The source's audience must also be considered. Significant coverage in media with an international, national, or at least
462:, then it is not notable simply because other individual organizations of its type are commonly notable or merely because
1697:
A single significant independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization.
254:
61:
1066:
2741:
2697:
2270:
1942:
is prohibited as an official
Knowledge (XXG) policy. Advertising should be removed by following these steps, in order:
525:
271:
1282:
inclusion in lists of similar organizations, particularly in "best of", "top 100", "fastest growing" or similar lists,
298:
2786:
2397:
2319:
1939:
491:
1875:
in a local newspaper or a book review in a newsletter by a city's library would not qualify as significant coverage.
2526:
A product or service is appropriate for its own
Knowledge (XXG) article when it has received sustained coverage in
2680:
1734:
1572:
2564:
it into an article with a broader scope (for example, an article about the type of product) or follow one of the
2686:
2646:
2531:
2691:
2258:
1445:
660:
2205:
they are substantially discussed by reliable independent sources that extend beyond the chapter's local area.
1392:
audience (e.g., the biggest daily newspaper in any US state) is a strong indication of notability. Attention
1310:
for a full discussion on what reviews of restaurants, events, and products qualify as significant coverage.
1058:
If you'd like to add a source assessment table to any deletion discussion page, you may use the user script
337:
2535:
2521:
548:
388:
175:
168:
161:
134:
1598:
any material that is substantially based on such press releases even if published by independent sources (
2639:
2550:
2254:
2233:
1777:
1730:
1658:
1110:
733:
674:
419:
142:
2222:
2600:
2553:. The relationship between a continuous line of products should be discussed within a single article.
2489:
2447:
2409:
2378:
2332:
2283:
2183:
2087:
2023:. The notability of such projects must therefore be established on the basis of other sources, such as
2020:
1982:
1922:
1827:
1680:
1528:
1455:
1410:
1371:
1319:
1172:
1084:
631:
554:
503:
433:
394:
78:
65:
2043:
The following sections discuss alternate methods for establishing notability in specific situations.
1852:
travel blogs) are newer and more prone to manipulation by marketing and public relations personnel.
1343:
A scholarly article, a book passage, or ongoing media coverage focusing on a product or organization,
2799:
2759:
2438:) likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion.
2242:
2028:
1946:
1561:
1196:
Examples of trivial coverage that do not count toward meeting the significant coverage requirement:
521:
2812:, the inclusion counts like any other reliable source, but it does not exempt the article from the
1059:
599:
2565:
1746:
653:
1142:
707:
595:
418:
to the organization or product. Notability requires only that these necessary sources have been
2594:
2561:
1433:
619:
330:
2547:
PU-36 Explosive Space
Modulator, Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator, R-36 Explosive Space Modulator
2360:
or both. The fact that a religious building is listed on a major historic register such as the
1878:
Be independent: Many reviews are not independent and are, in fact, a type of advertisement and
1355:
An extensive how-to guide written by people wholly independent of the company or product (e.g.
608:
significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject
1897:
1879:
1706:
1481:
1346:
A documentary film exploring environmental impact of the corporation's facilities or products,
1136:
2813:
2582:
2557:
2150:
1950:
1856:
1477:
1428:
1336:
Examples of substantial coverage that would generally be sufficient to meet the requirement:
544:
451:
2269:. If an embedded list is too large, but is not notable enough for a stand-alone list, then
2016:
2000:
1872:
1783:
1718:
1701:
1657:
any material written or published, including websites, by the organization, its members, or
1625:
1592:
702:
2765:
2633:
2578:
2357:
2309:
2065:
1761:
1449:
741:
614:
463:
327:
separate Knowledge (XXG) article dedicated solely to that organization, product, or service
2249:
Information on sub-chapters of notable organizations might be included in either prose or
1855:
Like any other source, to be counted towards the notability requirements, reviews must be
1712:
1641:
1621:
452:
No organization is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of organization it is
341:
2527:
2130:
1750:
667:
486:
412:
138:
477:
reliable sources independent of the organization have given significant coverage to it.
2808:
2396:
organizations for the purpose of overtly or covertly advertising a company. Please see
1791:
1545:
1043:
369:
353:
2214:
482:
150:
146:
2853:
1520:
1146:. However, the reputation of the source does help to determine whether the source is
17:
2839:
verified to be accurate by the patent offices or any other independent agency. See
2711:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
1508:), and other parties that have something, financially or otherwise, to gain or lose.
2744:, on the non-notability of run-of-the-mill organizations and routine media coverage
2542:
1645:
1505:
1491:
591:
587:
1248:
of the participation in industry events, such as trade fairs or panel discussions,
30:"WP:ORG", "WP:COMPANY" and "WP:CORP" redirect here. You may have been looking for
2465:
1605:
advertising and marketing materials by, about, or on behalf of the organization,
1401:
regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary.
1352:
A report by a consumer watchdog organization on the safety of a specific product,
902:
Most such posts are company-sponsored or based on company's marketing materials.
2803:
2312:, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered
1733:(greater availability of recent sources) when assessing historical companies or
1357:
583:
365:
357:
349:
2078:, especially with regards to avoiding indiscriminate inclusion of information.
1340:
A news article discussing a prolonged controversy regarding a corporate merger,
2522:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability § Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines
2004:
1857:
independent secondary sources that contain significant coverage of the subject
1666:
1633:
1599:
1516:
1485:
2261:
only if there are reliable sources dealing with the list as a topic, as with
1031:
There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements
458:. If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from
1496:. There are two types of independence to consider when evaluating sources:
1389:
1268:
of non-notable awards received by the organization, its people, or products,
757:
The analysis of the above example can be summarized in the following table:
677:; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.
345:
1571:
be used with appropriate care to verify some of the article's content. See
1349:
An encyclopedia entry giving an overview of the history of an organization,
1257:
of the expansions, acquisitions, mergers, sale, or closure of the business,
2762:, WikiProject Military History essay on notability of units and formations
2756:, on the notability provided by professional and reliable critical reviews
2628:
Content about the organization can be added into relevant articles if it:
1296:
presentations, speeches, lectures, etc. given by organization's personnel,
1209:
of employees, officers, directors, owners, or shareholders (see above for
2012:
1203:
of telephone numbers, addresses, directions, event times, shopping hours,
2768:, on notability for Internet related, computing, and services businesses
1629:
1245:
of a product or a product line launch, sale, change, or discontinuance,
579:
361:
2841:
Knowledge (XXG):Reliable source examples#Are patents reliable sources?
1523:
that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.
1271:
of sponsorship of events, non-profit organizations, or volunteer work,
1233:
standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage, such as:
1883:
1651:
1617:
713:
2126:
The scope of their activities is national or international in scale.
1289:
coverage of purely local events, incidents, controversies (see also
389:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability § Notability requires verifiable evidence
27:
Knowledge (XXG) policy for notability of organizations and companies
1864:
1242:
of the opening or closing of local branches, franchises, or shops,
1219:
of product instruction manuals, specifications, or certifications,
1472:
A primary test of notability is whether unrelated people with no
1427:
It is possible that an organization that is not itself generally
2716:
Knowledge (XXG):When your boss tells you to edit Knowledge (XXG)
2427:
1893:
1274:
in quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources,
2129:
The organization has received significant coverage in multiple
1613:
any paid or sponsored articles, posts, and other publications,
1239:
of quarterly or annual financial results and earning forecasts,
841:
A single-sentence mention in an article about another company.
705:
cites four sources: a single-sentence mention in an article by
1488:
do not count towards qualifying for an encyclopedia article.
1038:
450:
No company or organization is considered inherently notable.
119:
40:
372:, for-profit educational institutions or organizations, etc.
2556:
If a non-notable product or service has its own article, be
1140:
is a lot more significant than a single-sentence mention in
1042:
656:
addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
2683:(for companies that are creating articles about themselves)
1805:
public announcements of corporate actions (press releases),
1206:
of office locations, branches, franchises, or subsidiaries,
2750:, and what to be aware of when creating an article on one
549:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability § General notability guideline
64:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
1799:
corporate annual or financial reports, proxy statements,
1251:
of the shareholders' meetings or other corporate events,
2615:
2608:
2511:
2504:
2497:
2455:
2417:
2386:
2347:
2340:
2298:
2291:
2191:
2109:
2102:
2095:
1990:
1930:
1842:
1835:
1762:
although they may be reliable for verification purposes
1688:
1536:
1463:
1418:
1379:
1327:
1187:
1180:
1099:
1092:
639:
569:
562:
511:
441:
402:
107:
100:
93:
86:
2039:
Alternate criteria for specific types of organizations
137:
if it has been the subject of significant coverage in
2470:
Shell Service Station (Winston-Salem, North Carolina)
1863:
Be significant: Brief and routine reviews (including
1222:
of patents, copyrights, clinical trials, or lawsuits,
1955:
Erase remaining advertising content from the article
1254:
of the hiring, promotion, or departure of personnel,
1303:The examples above are not meant to be exhaustive.
2748:Knowledge (XXG):Businesses with a single location
2732:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
2158:Factors that have attracted widespread attention:
1260:of a capital transaction, such as raised capital,
1704:) reprinted in multiple newspapers (say, in the
1616:including pieces by non-staff "contributors" to
2727:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not LinkedIn
2263:Baird's Manual of American College Fraternities
2118:Organizations are usually notable if they meet
699:
52:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
2676:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (companies)
1817:product instruction manuals or specifications.
1787:significant, reliable or independent sources.
2816:that independent sources discuss the subject.
2721:Knowledge (XXG):Stern warning about promotion
2033:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (cryptocurrencies)
1977:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (cryptocurrencies)
306:
8:
2636:of detail and significance for that article;
1964:Knowledge (XXG):Criteria for speedy deletion
1766:Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources
1210:
1054:Tip: How to create a source assessment table
2267:List of Phi Kappa Psi chapters and colonies
2151:substantial verifiable evidence of coverage
2076:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
1432:sources, under different guidelines, e.g.,
1124:does not determine significance. It is the
60:Editors should generally follow it, though
2146:Nationally well-known local organizations:
1200:simple listings or compilations, such as:
1158:Significant coverage of the company itself
313:
299:
157:
2754:Knowledge (XXG):Every snowflake is unique
2007:-related projects, the consensus is that
490:companies are typically unacceptable per
2737:Knowledge (XXG):Places of local interest
2694:, style guideline for lists of companies
1151:
759:
468:
133:An organization is generally considered
2778:
2232:Aim for one good article, not multiple
1811:government audit or inspection reports,
1591:press releases, press kits, or similar
1583:Examples of dependent coverage that is
263:
174:
167:
160:
2645:only includes information that can be
2528:reliable independent secondary sources
1887:Therefore, editors should use reviews
613:These criteria, generally, follow the
383:Decisions based on verifiable evidence
2860:Knowledge (XXG) notability guidelines
2074:the article complies with the policy
2055:
1960:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
1147:
7:
2366:National Register of Historic Places
1999:When establishing the notability of
1958:Delete the article by listing it at
1871:). For example, a review of a local
1814:customer testimonials or complaints,
1802:memoirs or interviews by executives,
1587:sufficient to establish notability:
1307:
1265:brief or passing mentions, such as:
2178:Local units of larger organizations
1808:court filings, patent applications,
1236:of changes in share or bond prices,
2814:normal value of providing evidence
2700:, on notability of business people
2362:National Heritage List for England
1659:sources closely associated with it
68:. When in doubt, discuss first on
25:
2316:and must satisfy those criteria.
2009:crypto-centric news organizations
2583:Notability (geographic features)
2310:the general notability guideline
1560:Once notability is established,
1314:Examples of substantial coverage
1216:of product or service offerings,
1008:
998:
988:
978:
968:
950:
940:
930:
920:
910:
892:
882:
872:
862:
852:
831:
821:
811:
801:
791:
701:Imagine that a draft article on
123:
44:
2742:Knowledge (XXG):Run-of-the-mill
2549:, etc.) especially if there is
2141:Additional considerations are:
2789:, especially for universities.
2551:no realistic hope of expansion
2478:San Ysidro McDonald's massacre
1756:the more reliable the source.
1579:Examples of dependent coverage
666:Meet the standard for being a
606:if it has been the subject of
1:
2681:Knowledge (XXG):Autobiography
2579:General notability guidelines
2168:mean that its activities are
1868:
1654:, whether pending or granted,
1573:Knowledge (XXG):Autobiography
1290:
2687:Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Business
2404:Publicly traded corporations
2358:general notability guideline
2122:of the following standards:
2082:Non-commercial organizations
2066:general notability guideline
1555:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
1167:Examples of trivial coverage
615:general notability guideline
455:
169:General notability guideline
2666:section of the small town.
2588:
2317:
2035:may offer useful guidance.
1111:very brief, incomplete stub
466:
287:Why was my article deleted?
236:Organizations and companies
176:Subject-specific guidelines
2881:
2598:
2592:
2519:
2487:
2445:
2407:
2376:
2330:
2281:
2181:
2085:
1980:
1974:
1920:
1825:
1775:
1744:
1678:
1526:
1453:
1443:
1408:
1369:
1317:
1170:
1113:about the organization.
1082:
629:
552:
542:
519:
501:
431:
392:
386:
76:
70:this guideline's talk page
29:
2051:these alternate criteria,
1917:Advertising and promotion
1661:, directly or indirectly,
1022:
626:How to apply the criteria
620:advertising and promotion
32:WikiProject Organizations
2572:Transport infrastructure
2476:, not the location (see
2373:Commercial organizations
2314:commercial organizations
1211:#No inherited notability
1023:Total qualifying sources
338:charitable organizations
282:Common deletion outcomes
131:This page in a nutshell:
2369:building is an option.
2327:Religious organizations
2243:Knowledge (XXG):Merging
1484:, or any other form of
663:of the article subject.
498:No inherited notability
481:more readily available
2798:If the list itself is
1566:self-published sources
1047:
754:
742:subject-matter experts
428:No inherent notability
377:WP:Notability (people)
2865:WikiProject Companies
2640:avoids self-promotion
2593:Further information:
2484:Products and services
2442:Chains and franchises
1975:Further information:
1644:materials, including
1046:
520:Further information:
469:§ If it's not notable
36:WikiProject Companies
18:Knowledge (XXG):NCorp
2137:of the organization.
1951:Knowledge (XXG):NPOV
1843:WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS
1758:Questionable sources
1511:Independence of the
1500:Independence of the
1228:of statistical data,
1134:400-word article in
1079:Significant coverage
654:significant coverage
193:Astronomical objects
54:notability guideline
2651:independent sources
2589:If it's not notable
2585:continue to apply.
2058:for organizations,
1440:Independent sources
1067:Source assess table
1060:User:DannyS712/SATG
460:independent sources
248:Sports and athletes
217:Geographic features
2698:WP:NBUSINESSPERSON
2566:deletion processes
2210:within the context
1898:review aggregators
1546:Trade publications
1143:The New York Times
1048:
787:The New York Times
708:The New York Times
526:WP:NBUSINESSPERSON
2787:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES
2634:appropriate level
2480:for an example).
2398:WP:NOTADVERTISING
2320:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES
2271:consider trimming
1884:Sponsored reviews
1880:product placement
1772:Secondary sources
1707:Los Angeles Times
1482:product placement
1137:The Village Voice
1076:
1075:
1037:
1036:
685:source must meet
492:WP:NOTADVERTISING
485:information from
342:political parties
323:
322:
277:Guide to deletion
272:Notability essays
156:
155:
143:secondary sources
118:
117:
16:(Redirected from
2872:
2844:
2833:
2827:
2823:
2817:
2796:
2790:
2783:
2618:
2611:
2548:
2514:
2507:
2500:
2458:
2420:
2389:
2350:
2343:
2323:
2301:
2294:
2259:stand-alone list
2227:
2221:
2194:
2131:reliable sources
2112:
2105:
2098:
2056:primary criteria
2017:Bitcoin Magazine
2001:cryptocurrencies
1993:
1971:Cryptocurrencies
1933:
1873:harvest festival
1845:
1838:
1784:secondary source
1741:Reliable sources
1719:Orlando Sentinel
1691:
1675:Multiple sources
1626:Entrepreneur.com
1593:public relations
1539:
1466:
1421:
1382:
1330:
1308:#Product reviews
1190:
1183:
1102:
1095:
1071:
1065:
1062:or the template
1056:
1039:
1032:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1005:
1002:
1001:
995:
992:
991:
985:
982:
981:
975:
972:
971:
957:
954:
953:
947:
944:
943:
937:
934:
933:
927:
924:
923:
917:
914:
913:
899:
896:
895:
889:
886:
885:
879:
876:
875:
869:
866:
865:
859:
856:
855:
838:
835:
834:
828:
825:
824:
818:
815:
814:
808:
805:
804:
798:
795:
794:
760:
675:secondary source
642:
572:
565:
539:Primary criteria
514:
487:reliable sources
472:
444:
413:reliable sources
405:
315:
308:
301:
158:
127:
126:
120:
110:
103:
96:
89:
48:
47:
41:
21:
2880:
2879:
2875:
2874:
2873:
2871:
2870:
2869:
2850:
2849:
2848:
2847:
2834:
2830:
2824:
2820:
2797:
2793:
2784:
2780:
2775:
2672:
2622:
2621:
2614:
2607:
2603:
2597:
2591:
2574:
2546:
2536:Avoid splitting
2524:
2518:
2517:
2510:
2503:
2496:
2492:
2486:
2462:
2461:
2454:
2450:
2444:
2424:
2423:
2416:
2412:
2406:
2393:
2392:
2385:
2381:
2375:
2354:
2353:
2346:
2339:
2335:
2329:
2305:
2304:
2297:
2290:
2286:
2280:
2234:permanent stubs
2225:
2219:
2198:
2197:
2190:
2186:
2180:
2116:
2115:
2108:
2101:
2094:
2090:
2084:
2041:
1997:
1996:
1989:
1985:
1979:
1973:
1937:
1936:
1929:
1925:
1919:
1914:
1849:
1848:
1841:
1834:
1830:
1824:
1822:Product reviews
1780:
1774:
1753:
1743:
1713:Chicago Tribune
1695:
1694:
1687:
1683:
1677:
1622:Huffington Post
1581:
1562:primary sources
1543:
1542:
1535:
1531:
1474:vested interest
1470:
1469:
1462:
1458:
1452:
1442:
1425:
1424:
1417:
1413:
1407:
1405:Illegal conduct
1386:
1385:
1378:
1374:
1368:
1334:
1333:
1326:
1322:
1316:
1194:
1193:
1186:
1179:
1175:
1169:
1160:
1119:
1117:Numerical facts
1106:
1105:
1098:
1091:
1087:
1081:
1069:
1063:
1057:
1052:
1033:
1030:
1013:
1009:
1003:
999:
993:
989:
983:
979:
973:
969:
955:
951:
945:
941:
935:
931:
925:
921:
915:
911:
897:
893:
887:
883:
877:
873:
867:
863:
857:
853:
836:
832:
826:
822:
816:
812:
806:
802:
796:
792:
755:
698:
646:
645:
638:
634:
628:
576:
575:
568:
561:
557:
551:
541:
528:
518:
517:
510:
506:
500:
448:
447:
440:
436:
430:
409:
408:
401:
397:
391:
385:
370:proprietorships
354:interest groups
319:
259:
124:
114:
113:
106:
99:
92:
85:
81:
73:
45:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2878:
2876:
2868:
2867:
2862:
2852:
2851:
2846:
2845:
2828:
2818:
2809:Michelin Guide
2802:, such as the
2791:
2777:
2776:
2774:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2763:
2757:
2751:
2745:
2739:
2734:
2729:
2724:
2718:
2713:
2702:
2701:
2695:
2692:WP:LISTCOMPANY
2689:
2684:
2678:
2671:
2668:
2655:
2654:
2643:
2637:
2620:
2619:
2612:
2604:
2599:
2590:
2587:
2573:
2570:
2516:
2515:
2508:
2501:
2493:
2488:
2485:
2482:
2460:
2459:
2451:
2446:
2443:
2440:
2422:
2421:
2413:
2408:
2405:
2402:
2391:
2390:
2382:
2377:
2374:
2371:
2352:
2351:
2344:
2336:
2331:
2328:
2325:
2303:
2302:
2295:
2287:
2282:
2279:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2247:
2229:
2206:
2196:
2195:
2187:
2182:
2179:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2162:
2155:
2139:
2138:
2127:
2114:
2113:
2106:
2099:
2091:
2086:
2083:
2080:
2069:
2068:
2062:
2052:
2040:
2037:
1995:
1994:
1986:
1981:
1972:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1956:
1953:
1935:
1934:
1926:
1921:
1918:
1915:
1913:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1905:
1876:
1847:
1846:
1839:
1831:
1826:
1823:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1815:
1812:
1809:
1806:
1803:
1800:
1792:primary source
1773:
1770:
1742:
1739:
1693:
1692:
1689:WP:MULTSOURCES
1684:
1679:
1676:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1662:
1655:
1649:
1642:self-published
1639:
1638:
1637:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1603:
1596:
1580:
1577:
1541:
1540:
1532:
1527:
1525:
1524:
1509:
1492:unpaid sources
1478:Self-promotion
1468:
1467:
1459:
1454:
1446:WP:INDEPENDENT
1441:
1438:
1423:
1422:
1414:
1409:
1406:
1403:
1384:
1383:
1375:
1370:
1367:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1353:
1350:
1347:
1344:
1341:
1332:
1331:
1328:WP:SUBSTANTIAL
1323:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1301:
1300:
1297:
1294:
1287:
1283:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1275:
1272:
1269:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1258:
1255:
1252:
1249:
1246:
1243:
1240:
1237:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1226:
1223:
1220:
1217:
1214:
1207:
1204:
1192:
1191:
1184:
1176:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1159:
1156:
1118:
1115:
1104:
1103:
1096:
1088:
1083:
1080:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1051:
1049:
1035:
1034:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1006:
996:
986:
976:
966:
962:
961:
958:
948:
938:
928:
918:
908:
907:Tech blog post
904:
903:
900:
890:
880:
870:
860:
850:
843:
842:
839:
829:
819:
809:
799:
789:
783:
782:
779:
776:
773:
770:
767:
764:
750:
749:
745:
737:
726:
723:New York Times
696:
695:
679:
678:
671:
664:
659:Be completely
657:
644:
643:
635:
630:
627:
624:
574:
573:
566:
558:
553:
540:
537:
516:
515:
507:
502:
499:
496:
476:
446:
445:
437:
432:
429:
426:
407:
406:
398:
393:
384:
381:
321:
320:
318:
317:
310:
303:
295:
292:
291:
290:
289:
284:
279:
274:
266:
265:
261:
260:
258:
257:
251:
250:
245:
239:
238:
232:
231:
226:
220:
219:
213:
212:
207:
202:
196:
195:
189:
188:
182:
179:
178:
172:
171:
165:
164:
154:
153:
141:, independent
128:
116:
115:
112:
111:
104:
97:
90:
82:
77:
74:
59:
58:
49:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2877:
2866:
2863:
2861:
2858:
2857:
2855:
2842:
2838:
2832:
2829:
2822:
2819:
2815:
2811:
2810:
2805:
2801:
2795:
2792:
2788:
2785:But see also
2782:
2779:
2772:
2767:
2764:
2761:
2758:
2755:
2752:
2749:
2746:
2743:
2740:
2738:
2735:
2733:
2730:
2728:
2725:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2708:
2707:
2706:
2699:
2696:
2693:
2690:
2688:
2685:
2682:
2679:
2677:
2674:
2673:
2669:
2667:
2665:
2661:
2652:
2648:
2644:
2641:
2638:
2635:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2626:
2617:
2613:
2610:
2606:
2605:
2602:
2596:
2586:
2584:
2580:
2571:
2569:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2554:
2552:
2544:
2543:product lines
2539:
2537:
2533:
2532:primary topic
2529:
2523:
2513:
2509:
2506:
2502:
2499:
2495:
2494:
2491:
2483:
2481:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2457:
2453:
2452:
2449:
2441:
2439:
2437:
2432:
2429:
2419:
2415:
2414:
2411:
2403:
2401:
2399:
2388:
2387:WP:COMMERCIAL
2384:
2383:
2380:
2372:
2370:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2349:
2345:
2342:
2338:
2337:
2334:
2326:
2324:
2321:
2315:
2311:
2300:
2296:
2293:
2289:
2288:
2285:
2277:
2272:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2246:
2244:
2237:
2235:
2230:
2224:
2216:
2211:
2207:
2204:
2200:
2199:
2193:
2189:
2188:
2185:
2177:
2171:
2167:
2163:
2159:
2156:
2152:
2147:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2121:
2111:
2107:
2104:
2100:
2097:
2093:
2092:
2089:
2081:
2079:
2077:
2073:
2067:
2063:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2046:
2038:
2036:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1992:
1988:
1987:
1984:
1978:
1970:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1954:
1952:
1948:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1941:
1932:
1928:
1927:
1924:
1916:
1912:Special notes
1911:
1906:
1903:
1899:
1896:review (e.g.
1895:
1890:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1858:
1853:
1844:
1840:
1837:
1836:WP:PRODUCTREV
1833:
1832:
1829:
1821:
1816:
1813:
1810:
1807:
1804:
1801:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1793:
1788:
1785:
1779:
1771:
1769:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1752:
1748:
1740:
1738:
1736:
1735:systemic bias
1732:
1727:
1723:
1721:
1720:
1715:
1714:
1709:
1708:
1703:
1698:
1690:
1686:
1685:
1682:
1674:
1669:
1668:
1663:
1660:
1656:
1653:
1650:
1647:
1643:
1640:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1614:
1612:
1607:
1606:
1604:
1601:
1597:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1586:
1578:
1576:
1574:
1570:
1567:
1563:
1558:
1556:
1550:
1547:
1538:
1534:
1533:
1530:
1522:
1521:fact checking
1518:
1514:
1510:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1495:
1493:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1465:
1461:
1460:
1457:
1451:
1447:
1439:
1437:
1435:
1430:
1420:
1416:
1415:
1412:
1404:
1402:
1400:
1395:
1391:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1373:
1365:
1360:
1359:
1354:
1351:
1348:
1345:
1342:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1329:
1325:
1324:
1321:
1313:
1311:
1309:
1304:
1298:
1295:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1281:
1276:
1273:
1270:
1267:
1266:
1264:
1259:
1256:
1253:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1241:
1238:
1235:
1234:
1232:
1227:
1224:
1221:
1218:
1215:
1212:
1208:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1189:
1185:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1174:
1166:
1164:
1157:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1139:
1138:
1132:
1127:
1123:
1116:
1114:
1112:
1101:
1097:
1094:
1090:
1089:
1086:
1078:
1068:
1061:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1041:
1040:
1028:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1007:
997:
987:
977:
967:
964:
963:
959:
949:
939:
929:
919:
909:
906:
905:
901:
891:
881:
871:
861:
851:
849:
845:
844:
840:
830:
820:
810:
800:
790:
788:
785:
784:
780:
777:
774:
771:
768:
765:
762:
761:
758:
753:
746:
743:
738:
735:
731:
727:
724:
720:
719:
718:
716:
715:
710:
709:
704:
694:
692:
688:
684:
676:
672:
669:
665:
662:
658:
655:
651:
650:
649:
641:
637:
636:
633:
625:
623:
621:
616:
611:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
571:
567:
564:
560:
559:
556:
550:
546:
538:
536:
532:
527:
523:
513:
512:WP:INHERITORG
509:
508:
505:
497:
495:
493:
488:
484:
478:
474:
470:
465:
461:
457:
453:
443:
439:
438:
435:
427:
425:
423:
422:
417:
414:
404:
400:
399:
396:
390:
382:
380:
378:
373:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
332:
328:
316:
311:
309:
304:
302:
297:
296:
294:
293:
288:
285:
283:
280:
278:
275:
273:
270:
269:
268:
267:
262:
256:
253:
252:
249:
246:
244:
241:
240:
237:
234:
233:
230:
227:
225:
222:
221:
218:
215:
214:
211:
208:
206:
203:
201:
198:
197:
194:
191:
190:
187:
184:
183:
181:
180:
177:
173:
170:
166:
163:
159:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
129:
122:
121:
109:
105:
102:
98:
95:
91:
88:
84:
83:
80:
75:
71:
67:
63:
57:
55:
50:
43:
42:
37:
33:
19:
2836:
2831:
2821:
2807:
2794:
2781:
2704:
2703:
2663:
2659:
2656:
2627:
2623:
2575:
2555:
2540:
2525:
2473:
2463:
2435:
2433:
2425:
2394:
2355:
2313:
2306:
2251:a brief list
2240:
2231:
2223:splitsection
2209:
2202:
2169:
2165:
2157:
2145:
2140:
2119:
2117:
2103:WP:NONPROFIT
2071:
2070:
2059:
2044:
2042:
2031:. The essay
2029:news sources
2024:
2008:
1998:
1938:
1901:
1888:
1854:
1850:
1789:
1781:
1778:WP:SECONDARY
1754:
1728:
1724:
1717:
1711:
1705:
1699:
1696:
1665:
1646:vanity press
1584:
1582:
1568:
1559:
1551:
1544:
1512:
1506:astroturfing
1501:
1489:
1471:
1426:
1398:
1393:
1387:
1356:
1335:
1305:
1302:
1195:
1161:
1141:
1135:
1130:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1107:
1093:WP:CORPDEPTH
1053:
965:Court filing
847:
786:
769:Independent?
766:Significant?
756:
751:
734:WP:FORBESCON
729:
722:
712:
706:
700:
690:
686:
682:
680:
647:
612:
607:
603:
602:is presumed
588:organization
577:
533:
529:
479:
454:, including
449:
420:
415:
410:
374:
366:partnerships
358:social clubs
350:institutions
335:
326:
324:
235:
130:
51:
2804:Fortune 500
2616:WP:FAILCORP
2512:WP:NPRODUCT
2505:WP:PRODUCTS
2299:WP:NHSCHOOL
2265:supporting
2166:necessarily
2161:conclusive.
2135:independent
2021:WP:ORGCRITE
1940:Advertising
1358:For Dummies
1181:WP:CORPTRIV
1152:independent
1100:WP:ORGDEPTH
846:Profile in
661:independent
584:corporation
563:WP:ORGCRITE
387:Main page:
255:Web content
2854:Categories
2760:WP:MILUNIT
2609:WP:FAILORG
2520:See also:
2498:WP:PRODUCT
2466:McDonald's
2348:WP:NCHURCH
2341:WP:NRELORG
2318:(See also
2292:WP:NSCHOOL
2215:notability
2025:mainstream
2005:blockchain
2003:and other
1991:WP:NCRYPTO
1931:WP:ADPROMO
1776:See also:
1745:See also:
1716:, and the
1634:TechCrunch
1600:churnalism
1517:churnalism
1486:paid media
1444:See also:
1188:WP:ORGTRIV
775:Secondary?
714:Forbes.com
697:An example
683:individual
570:WP:ORGCRIT
543:See also:
522:WP:PRODUCT
483:verifiable
162:Notability
147:verifiable
62:exceptions
2601:Shortcuts
2490:Shortcuts
2418:WP:LISTED
2333:Shortcuts
2284:Shortcuts
2257:out as a
2255:splitting
2192:WP:BRANCH
2133:that are
2088:Shortcuts
2027:reliable
2011:—such as
1869:#Audience
1828:Shortcuts
1747:WP:SOURCE
1731:recentism
1667:Who's Who
1595:materials
1537:WP:TRADES
1464:WP:ORGIND
1419:WP:ILLCON
1291:#Audience
1286:almanacs,
1173:Shortcuts
1085:Shortcuts
778:Pass/Fail
772:Reliable?
748:outcome).
703:Acme Inc.
555:Shortcuts
464:it exists
442:WP:ORGSIG
421:published
416:unrelated
362:companies
346:hospitals
186:Academics
79:Shortcuts
66:consensus
2826:stories.
2806:and the
2670:See also
2649:through
2647:verified
2632:has the
2595:WP:FAILN
2456:WP:CHAIN
2448:Shortcut
2410:Shortcut
2379:Shortcut
2184:Shortcut
2154:instead.
2013:Coindesk
1983:Shortcut
1966:instead.
1947:Clean up
1923:Shortcut
1681:Shortcut
1529:Shortcut
1456:Shortcut
1434:WP:CRIME
1411:Shortcut
1390:regional
1372:Shortcut
1366:Audience
1320:Shortcut
1148:reliable
1122:Quantity
691:multiple
668:reliable
652:Contain
632:Shortcut
504:Shortcut
471:, below)
434:Shortcut
403:WP:ORGIN
395:Shortcut
331:WP:MUSIC
264:See also
139:reliable
108:WP:NCORP
2800:notable
2705:Essays:
2664:Economy
2660:History
2436:certain
2364:or the
2278:Schools
2096:WP:CLUB
1652:patents
1630:Inc.com
1513:content
1429:notable
1293:below),
1131:discuss
1126:quality
670:source.
640:WP:SIRS
604:notable
600:service
596:product
580:company
545:WP:PSTS
456:schools
229:Numbers
135:notable
101:WP:CORP
94:WP:NORG
2766:WP:B2B
2203:unless
2110:WP:NGO
1710:, the
1618:Forbes
1502:author
1450:WP:COI
1394:solely
1380:WP:AUD
848:Forbes
781:Notes
763:Source
730:Forbes
475:unless
243:People
205:Events
87:WP:ORG
2773:Notes
2642:; and
2562:merge
2474:event
2173:live.
2170:truly
1865:Zagat
1751:WP:RS
1494:count
1490:Only
673:Be a
598:, or
592:group
467:(see
224:Music
210:Films
200:Books
2581:and
2560:and
2558:bold
2541:For
2428:NYSE
2241:See
2120:both
2064:the
2054:the
1949:per
1894:meta
1889:only
1749:and
1564:and
1448:and
1306:See
1150:and
728:The
721:The
547:and
524:and
2837:not
2662:or
2072:and
2015:or
1902:may
1585:not
1569:may
1399:one
687:all
681:An
610:.
333:.
34:or
2856::
2568:.
2534:.
2400:.
2322:.)
2226:}}
2220:{{
2060:or
1882:.
1859::
1790:A
1782:A
1768:.
1702:AP
1670:).
1632:,
1628:,
1624:,
1620:,
1602:),
1557:.
1480:,
1436:.
1361:).
1213:),
1154:.
1070:}}
1064:{{
744:).
736:).
594:,
590:,
586:,
582:,
578:A
494:.
379:.
368:,
364:,
360:,
356:,
352:,
348:,
344:,
340:,
149:.
2843:.
2723:‎
2653:.
2273:.
2245:.
2236::
2228:.
1648:,
1072:.
1026:0
1014:N
1004:N
994:Y
984:N
974:Y
956:N
946:Y
936:N
926:?
916:Y
898:N
888:Y
878:N
868:N
858:Y
837:N
827:Y
817:Y
807:Y
797:N
314:e
307:t
300:v
72:.
56:.
38:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.