157:
35:
105:
249:
And finally, if for some insane reason I don't act on your wise proposals, tell everyone that you know that
Knowledge is all a scam to make money. It's a tool of capitalist oppression. It's a liberal playground with no standards. It's based on the principles of communism. It's collectivist. It's
128:
Nothing in the page should be construed to discourage you from discussing editing matters directly with me. I remain very active in
Knowledge on a daily basis and monitor dozens of discussions. I try not to directly intervene and to make clear when I am just editing as an ordinary editor. I don't
232:
First, it's very important that you write me a minimum of 6 pages of text explaining and defending the version that you prefer. The more tedious details, the better. I'm specifically keenly interested in the names of obscure rivers in
Germany, er, I mean Poland, er, I mean Prussia. Also, be sure
180:
people. This is made up of a large cabal who routinely either point out that the decisions made are correct, that Jimmy shouldn't be bothered with worthless tripe, or that Jimbo normally doesn't enter into these sort of discussions. Furthermore, when Jimbo does respond he rarely takes sides, unless
243:
Fourth, if you happen to know that I'm personally politically sympathetic to your point of view, feel free to call your opponents names. For example, since I'm generally sympathetic to Israel, feel free to call anyone who has written anything critical of Israel a "Nazi". I'll get so excited that
172:
that it would be best to appeal to him directly. The theory behind this is that their appeals will be heard and Jimbo will latch onto the argument in full agreement with the petitioner. Thereafter, Jimbo will logically smite the wicked editor who dared raise concerns about their
129:
like it when people take random comments I make when I'm trying to be helpful in a discussion, and treat them as hammers for beating on other people. But I also do love the editing process, I do have long experience, and I think I can often be helpful to you.—
236:
Second, everyone knows that I make it a routine practice to force articles to read exactly the way that you like. I also ban longtime users and sysops whenever I feel like, just based on the say-so of people just like you. So be sure to ask for
198:
may actually harm it in the eyes of other editors, as this often seems to be an attempt to make an end run around an existing consensus. As appealing to Jimbo tends to be the end of the discussion some have likened such a course of action to
284:
206:
So the best advice to editors who feel that appealing to Jimmy Wales can get around discussing issues with the wider community is to think again. It may not get them what they desire. They have been warned!
118:
142:
250:
individualist. It's useless. It's the most important thing in the world, except for me screwing it up. That'll show old Jimbo who he's messing with!
192:
This means that if the editor has to appeal to Jimbo's talk page, they will almost certainly not persuade anyone of the merits of their case. Indeed,
164:
Generally, discussion happens and either the contributor concedes or goes away grumpy. However, a selected few contributors feel that as
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
51:
274:
244:
I'll probably ban them. Heck, I might even write new code in the software to only let you and people you approve edit the pages!
194:
141:
A number of contributors are unhappy with the way that various matters have been dealt with on
Knowledge. Some are unhappy about
307:
279:
329:
156:
269:
240:
Third, better yet, don't ask for it, demand it. Threaten to leave if I don't comply within 24 hours. That always works.
114:
185:.) Which in almost all instances is not the case with appeals to his talk page. And if it is, he'll normally get the
176:
The unfortunate news here is that it almost never works. Jimmy's talk page is monitored (at the time of writing) by
324:
182:
289:
153:
should not be removed from the project. These are just some of the things that an editor can get upset about.
308:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=The_Wrong_Version&type=revision&diff=25630&oldid=25600
227:
I'd like to add some additional recommendations for people who'd like to appeal such cases directly to me.
134:
233:
to write to me about the shape of bigfoot's head, I really am the person to make a decision about that.
186:
55:
146:
65:
216:
169:
181:
it is a completely egregious and inescapably important issue that must be responded to (e.g.
255:
220:
165:
130:
113:"Appeal to Jimbo" is the last resort. If you're doing that, be sure you have followed other
43:
173:
behaviour/fundamentally change existing policy/delete the offending item from
Knowledge.
117:
steps first. By the way, this doesn't work for
Arbitration Committee rulings (following
318:
200:
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
17:
150:
285:
Knowledge:Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
155:
99:
29:
177:
87:
80:
73:
225:
126:
219:on how to involve him when consensus supports
8:
149:, while yet others feel that links to their
290:Meta:The Wrong Version § Involving Jimbo
300:
7:
211:And now a word from our sponsor...
145:, others are upset that there are
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
52:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
275:Knowledge:Argumentum ad Jimbonem
103:
33:
170:founder/co-founder of Knowledge
280:Knowledge:What Would Jimbo Do?
1:
270:Knowledge:Role of Jimmy Wales
258:13:32, 6 February 2004 (UTC)
147:offensive images on articles
346:
160:Editors appealing to Jimbo
63:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge
183:Knowledge:SOPA initiative
137:) 15:26, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
111:This page in a nutshell:
143:administrator decisions
121:of arbitration policy).
261:
195:argumentum ad Jimbonem
161:
139:
330:Knowledge Jimbo Wales
159:
54:, as it has not been
187:Wikimedia Foundation
18:Knowledge:NOTSOLOMON
189:to do it for him.
119:community amendment
162:
115:dispute resolution
221:the wrong version
125:
124:
98:
97:
16:(Redirected from
337:
325:Knowledge essays
310:
305:
259:
107:
106:
100:
90:
83:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
345:
344:
340:
339:
338:
336:
335:
334:
315:
314:
313:
306:
302:
298:
266:
260:
254:
213:
104:
94:
93:
86:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
343:
341:
333:
332:
327:
317:
316:
312:
311:
299:
297:
294:
293:
292:
287:
282:
277:
272:
265:
262:
252:
246:
245:
242:
241:
239:
238:
235:
234:
231:
228:
217:Jimbo's advice
212:
209:
123:
122:
108:
96:
95:
92:
91:
84:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
342:
331:
328:
326:
323:
322:
320:
309:
304:
301:
295:
291:
288:
286:
283:
281:
278:
276:
273:
271:
268:
267:
263:
257:
251:
247:
229:
224:
222:
218:
210:
208:
204:
202:
197:
196:
190:
188:
184:
179:
174:
171:
167:
158:
154:
152:
148:
144:
138:
136:
132:
120:
116:
112:
109:
102:
101:
89:
88:WP:DONTBOTHER
85:
82:
81:WP:NOTSOLOMON
78:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
303:
248:
230:
226:
214:
205:
201:Godwin's Law
193:
191:
175:
163:
140:
127:
110:
41:
256:Jimbo Wales
166:Jimbo Wales
151:pet website
131:Jimbo Wales
42:This is an
319:Categories
296:References
74:WP:YOULOSE
66:Shortcuts
264:See also
215:This is
168:is the
237:that.
178:3,845
44:essay
135:talk
321::
253:—
223::
203:.
133:(
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.