1831:) do not qualify. Significant reviews are where the author has personally experienced or tested the product and describes their experiences in some depth, provides broader context, and draws comparisons with other products. Reviews that narrowly focus on a particular product or function without broader context (e.g. review of a particular meal without description of the restaurant as a whole) do not count as significant sources. Reviews that are too generic or vague to make the determination whether the author had personal experience with the reviewed product are not to be counted as significant sources. Further, the reviews must be published outside of purely local or narrow (highly specialized) interest publications (see also
1686:) is still one source (one newspaper article). If multiple journalists at multiple newspapers separately and independently write about the same subject, then each of these unrelated articles should be considered separate sources, even if they are writing about the same event or "story". A series of articles by the same journalist is still treated as one source (one person). The appearance of different articles in the same newspaper is still one source (one publisher). Similarly, a series of books by the same author is one source.
911:
1033:
979:
959:
931:
901:
873:
843:
812:
802:
792:
35:
318:. The scope of this guideline covers all groups of people organized together for a purpose with the exception of non-profit educational institutions, religions or sects, and sports teams. If another subject-specific notability guideline applies to a group, it may be notable by passing either this or the more specific guideline. For example, bands are covered by
1701:(greater availability of English and Western sources) when discussing organizations in the developing world. Therefore, for example, a Bangladeshi women's rights organization from the 1960s might establish notability with just one or two quality sources, while the same is not true for a tech start-up in a major U.S. metropolitan area.
114:
999:
989:
969:
941:
921:
883:
863:
853:
822:
782:
1468:(or functional independence): the author must be unrelated to the company, organization, or product. Related persons include organization's personnel, owners, investors, (sub)contractors, vendors, distributors, suppliers, other business partners and associates, customers, competitors, sponsors and sponsorees (including
2432:. Since there is generally very little to say about individual stores or franchises that is not true for the chain in general, Knowledge (XXG) should not have articles on such individual stores. In rare cases, an individual location will have architectural peculiarities that makes it notable, such as the
1151:
Sources are not transferable or attributable between related parties. Sources that describe only a specific topic related to an organization should not be regarded as providing significant coverage of that organization. Therefore, for example, an article on a product recall or a biography of a CEO is
1097:
The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to establish notability. Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product,
519:
An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it. A corporation is not notable merely because it owns notable subsidiaries. The organization or corporation itself must have been discussed in reliable independent sources for it to be considered notable.
1122:
in some depth the treatment of the employees or major changes in leadership instead of just listing the fact that the corporation employs 500 people or mentioning that John Smith was appointed as the new CEO. Further, the significance is not determined by the reputation of the source. For example, a
1719:
Reliable sources, generally, are third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments. The greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues,
469:
When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please consider whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. Large organizations and their products are likely to have
1815:
Product, event, and restaurant reviews (i.e. where author describes personal opinions and experiences) must be handled with great care and diligence. Some types of reviews have a longer history and established traditions (e.g. restaurants, wine, books, movies), while other (e.g. new tech gadgets,
478:
that provide evidence of notability. However, smaller organizations and their products can be notable, just as individuals can be notable. Arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations or their products, though articles about very small "garage" or local
1750:
provides an author's own thinking based on primary sources, generally at least one step removed from an event. It contains an author's analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources. Secondary sources are not necessarily
1117:
of the content that governs. A collection of multiple trivial sources does not become significant. Views, hits, likes, shares, etc. have no bearing on establishing whether the coverage is significant. Similarly, arbitrary statistics and numbers (such as number of employees, amount of revenue or
1395:
will have a number of significant sources discussing its (alleged) illegal conduct. Sources that primarily discuss purely such conduct cannot be used to establish an organization's notability under this guideline. However, the organization may still be notable, in whole or in part due to such
2332:
in the U.S. does not necessarily mean that the religious organization that owns or meets in the building is notable. However, it is possible that both the building and the institution are notable independently from each other – in which case, a combined article about the institution and the
1850:
include reviews where the reviewed product is provided free of charge to the author. Often, sponsored nature of a review is not disclosed and not immediately apparent. In particular, a strong indication of a sponsored or other relationship is a review that is excessively positive or negative.
2394:
and other comparable international stock exchanges, are inherently notable. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this (or any other) case. However, sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies, so that notability can be established using the primary
2359:
Some commercial organizations meet
Knowledge (XXG) notability guidelines but care must be taken in determining whether they are truly notable and whether the article is an attempt to use Knowledge (XXG) for free advertising. Knowledge (XXG) editors should not create articles on commercial
736:
The court filing is significant and reliable (in that the court record is a verified account of a legal action being taken) – but not secondary (court filings are primary sources) or independent (they are written by the parties to the legal action, which have a vested interest in the
523:
This works the other way as well. An organization may be notable, but individual members (or groups of members) do not "inherit" notability due to their membership. A corporation may be notable, but its subsidiaries do not "inherit" notability from being owned by the corporation.
2494:. In cases where a company is mainly known for a single series of products or services, it is usually better to cover the company and its products/services in the same article. This article can be the name of the company or the name of its product, depending on which is the
2176:
of an article about the parent organization. If the parent article grows to the point where information needs to be split off to a new article, remember that when you split off an article about a local chapter, the local chapter itself must comply with
Knowledge (XXG)'s
2124:
The organization's longevity, size of membership, major achievements, prominent scandals, or other factors specific to the organization should be considered to the extent that these factors have been reported by independent sources. This list is not exhaustive and not
2202:
Individual chapters, divisions, departments, and other sub-units of notable organizations are only rarely notable enough to warrant a separate article. Information on chapters and affiliates should normally be merged into the article about the parent organization.
1689:
The existence of multiple significant independent sources needs to be demonstrated. Hypothetical sources (e.g. "the company is big/old/important so there must be more sources, I just don't have/can't find them") do not count towards the notability requirement.
2271:
All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations (i.e., this page),
2588:
Although an organization that fails to meet the criteria of this guideline should not have a separate article, information about the organization may nevertheless be included in other ways in
Knowledge (XXG) provided that certain conditions are met.
2395:
criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage and analyst reports. Accordingly, article authors should make sure to seek out such coverage and add references to such articles to properly establish notability.
1664:"Source" on Knowledge (XXG) can refer to the work itself, the author of the work, and/or the publisher of the work. For notability purposes, sources must be unrelated to each other to be "multiple". A story from a single news organization (such as
1267:
inclusion in collections that have indiscriminate inclusion criteria (i.e. attempt to include every existing item instead of selecting the best, most notable examples), such as databases, archives, directories, dictionaries, bibliographies, certain
2621:
For organizations local to a city, town, or county, content conforming to the above criteria may be added to articles for that locale. For example, a business that is significant to the history or economy of a small town might be described in the
2436:; however, a series of articles on every single Wal-Mart in China would not be informative. An exception can be made if a major event occurred at a local store; however, this would most likely be created under an article name that describes the
606:
with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources to prevent gaming of the rules by marketing and public relations professionals. The guideline, among other things, is meant to address some of the common issues with abusing
Knowledge (XXG) for
1758:
is original material that is close to an event, and is often an account written by people who are directly involved. Primary sources cannot be used to establish notability. In a business setting, frequently encountered primary sources include:
1479:(or intellectual independence): the content must not be produced by interested parties. Often a related party produces a narrative that is then copied, regurgitated, and published in whole or in part by independent parties (as exemplified by
2540:
This guideline does not apply to transport infrastructure such as railway lines and stations, airports, and toll roads, even when the company running the installation has that task as its single purpose. Other notability guidelines such as
2789:
A feature story is usually a longer article where the writer has researched and interviewed to tell a factual story about a person, place, event, idea, or issue. Features are not opinion-driven and are more in-depth than traditional news
1516:
If a source's independence is in any doubt, it is better to exercise caution and exclude it from determining quality sources for the purposes of establishing notability. If contested, consensus on the use of sources can be sought at the
2674:
2136:
international. Example: a tiny fraternal organization with a total membership of sixty members, worldwide, is not "international in scale" simply because the members live in separate countries and have formed sub-chapters where they
1855:
from sources with well established reputation for independence and objectivity. Further, reviews that simply regurgitate someone else's opinion are also not independent sources unless enough original work was put in to produce a
1360:
from local media (e.g., the weekly newspaper for a small town), or media of limited interest and circulation (e.g., a newsletter exclusively for people with a very unusual job), is not an indication of notability. At least
1512:
must be used with great care. While feature stories from leading trade magazines may be used where independence is clear, there is a presumption against the use of coverage in trade magazines to establish notability.
520:
Examples: If a notable person buys a restaurant, the restaurant does not "inherit" notability from its owner. If a notable person joins an organization, the organization does not "inherit" notability from its member.
1152:
a significant coverage for the
Knowledge (XXG) article on the product or the CEO, but not a significant coverage on the company (unless the article or biography devotes significant attention to the company itself).
2181:
guidelines, without reference to the notability of the parent organization. Take care not to split off a section that would be considered non-notable on its own. Splitting should occur as a top-down process. See
728:
The tech blog review is significant and secondary – but may not be independent (blog posts are often sponsored) and is not reliable (self-published sources are generally not reliable, unless they are written by
2112:
Some organizations are local in scope, but have achieved national or even international notice. Organizations whose activities are local in scope (e.g., a school or club) can be considered notable if there is
1864:). If the suitability of a source is in doubt, it is better to exercise caution and to exclude the source for the purposes of establishing notability. Once notability is established, non-independent reviews
2117:
by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area. Where coverage is only local in scope, consider adding a section on the organization to an article on the organization's local area
462:. "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance". No matter how "important" editors may personally believe an organization to be, it should not have a stand-alone article in Knowledge (XXG)
1098:
company, or organization. Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than a
400:
Knowledge (XXG) bases its decision about whether an organization is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the organization or product has attracted the notice of
1259:
as an example of a type of company or product being discussed (e.g. "In response to the protests, various companies, such as Acme Inc, have pledged to address working conditions in their factories")
2398:
Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high (but not
611:. As such, the guideline establishes generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability than for sources that are allowed as acceptable references within an article.
1628:
other works in which the company, corporation, organization, or group talks about itself—whether published by itself, or re-printed by other people (for example, self-submitted biographies to
58:
2679:
1871:
Be reliable: The reviews must be published in reliable sources that provide editorial oversight and strive to maintain objectivity. Self-published reviews (e.g. most blogs) do not qualify.
1440:
in the subject have actually considered the company, corporation, product or service notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial, non-routine works that focus upon it.
2320:
Individual religious organizations (whether called congregations, synods, synagogues, temples, churches, etc.) must meet the notability guideline for organizations and companies or the
706:
blog by a non-staff contributor; a blog post by a tech enthusiast who has provided a review of the product; and a court filing by a competitor alleging patent infringement. Analysis:
682:
such sources to establish notability. If the suitability of a source is in doubt, it is better to exercise caution and exclude the source for the purposes of establishing notability.
2011:
These criteria constitute an optional, alternative method for demonstrating notability. Organizations are considered notable if they meet one of the following sourcing requirements
1529:
637:
Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability:
2433:
2390:
There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the
1007:
Court filings are primary sources. While we hope they will be truthful, court filings are written by the company (or its opponents in court), so they are not independent.
678:
of these criteria to be counted towards establishing notability; each source needs to be significant, independent, reliable, and secondary. In addition, there must also be
2128:
Caveat – Be cautious of claims that small organizations are national or international in scale. The fact that an organization has branches in multiple countries does not
270:
275:
2226:
1724:
are those that have a poor reputation for checking the facts, lack meaningful editorial oversight, or have an apparent conflict of interest. Self-published sources,
721:
blog profile is significant and secondary – but not independent or reliable (most such posts are company-sponsored or based on a company's marketing materials - see
2711:
2165:
As a general rule, the individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not considered notable enough to warrant a separate article –
325:
Simply stated, an organization is a group of more than one person formed together for a purpose. This includes commercial and non-commercial activities, such as
181:
2009:
No organization is considered notable except to the extent that independent sources demonstrate that it has been noticed by people outside of the organization.
205:
301:
2502:
the company and its products into separate articles, unless both have so much coverage in reliable secondary sources as to make a single article unwieldy.
2230:
2172:
In some cases, a specific local chapter or sub-organization that is not considered notable enough for its own article may be significant enough to mention
2823:
2639:
2214:
42:
2695:
2799:
Patents are written and published solely at the direction of the inventor or organization that the inventor assigned the patent to. Their contents are
2684:
1996:
1940:
1483:). Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and
1281:
other listings and mentions not accompanied by commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization.
1927:
1729:
1518:
364:
This guideline does not cover small groups of closely related people such as families, entertainment groups, co-authors, and co-inventors covered by
2690:
1118:
raised capital, age of the company, etc.) do not make the coverage significant. For the coverage to be significant, the sources must describe and
741:
Therefore, the article does not have a single source that could be used to establish the notability of the company, let alone multiple sources.
314:
This page is to help determine whether an organization (commercial or otherwise), or any of its products and services, is a valid subject for a
1437:
2717:
20:
1926:
if no notable content remains. However, if an article contains only blatant advertising, with no other useful content, it may be tagged per
1693:
The word "multiple" is not a set number and depends on the type of organization or product. Editors should recognize certain biases, such as
2804:
2700:
413:—even if these sources are not actually listed in the article yet (though in most cases it probably would improve the article to add them).
2329:
2039:
1868:
be used to verify some non-controversial facts in the article (e.g. number of employees, number of tables in a restaurant, product models).
1600:, and other publications that accept public contributions and that do not provide meaningful editorial oversight of the submitted content,
1539:
for the verifiability and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material.
1983:—generally cannot be used, as they do not provide coverage that can be considered "independent" from their subject for the purposes of
174:
2325:
2217:
in the main article on the organization. If an embedded list becomes too large for the parent article, consideration may be given to
714:
article is reliable, independent, and secondary – but not significant (a single-sentence mention in an article about another company).
1923:
24:
1721:
1207:
of event schedules or results (such as theater performance schedule, score table of a sporting event, listing of award recipients),
217:
700:
while pointing out a missing feature in a rival's product when compared to the product by Acme; an extensive company profile in a
134:. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be
2428:
Many companies have chains of local stores or franchises that are individually pretty much interchangeable—for instance, a local
294:
2614:
2098:
1728:, are generally not accepted as evidence of notability. For a full discussion on what is and what is not a reliable source, see
949:
Blog posts are often sponsored and self-published sources are generally not reliable unless written by a subject-matter expert.
448:
365:
236:
231:
193:
140:
If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then
Knowledge (XXG) should not have an article on it.
2441:
1572:
including pieces like "case studies" or "success stories" by
Chambers of Commerce, business incubators, consulting firms, etc.
212:
198:
188:
2828:
265:
2509:
that are produced and/or marketed by the same company, avoid creating multiple stubs about each individual product (e.g.,
1352:
The source's audience must also be considered. Significant coverage in media with an international, national, or at least
451:, then it is not notable simply because other individual organizations of its type are commonly notable or merely because
1661:
A single significant independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization.
243:
50:
1055:
2705:
2661:
2234:
1906:
is prohibited as an official
Knowledge (XXG) policy. Advertising should be removed by following these steps, in order:
514:
260:
1264:
inclusion in lists of similar organizations, particularly in "best of", "top 100", "fastest growing" or similar lists,
287:
2750:
2361:
2283:
1903:
480:
1839:
in a local newspaper or a book review in a newsletter by a city's library would not qualify as significant coverage.
2490:
A product or service is appropriate for its own
Knowledge (XXG) article when it has received sustained coverage in
2644:
1698:
1536:
2528:
it into an article with a broader scope (for example, an article about the type of product) or follow one of the
2650:
2610:
2495:
2655:
2222:
1409:
649:
2169:
they are substantially discussed by reliable independent sources that extend beyond the chapter's local area.
1356:
audience (e.g., the biggest daily newspaper in any US state) is a strong indication of notability. Attention
1292:
for a full discussion on what reviews of restaurants, events, and products qualify as significant coverage.
1047:
If you'd like to add a source assessment table to any deletion discussion page, you may use the user script
326:
2499:
2485:
537:
377:
164:
157:
150:
123:
1562:
any material that is substantially based on such press releases even if published by independent sources (
2603:
2514:
2218:
2197:
1741:
1694:
1622:
1099:
722:
663:
408:
131:
2186:
2564:
2517:. The relationship between a continuous line of products should be discussed within a single article.
2453:
2411:
2373:
2342:
2296:
2247:
2147:
2051:
1987:. The notability of such projects must therefore be established on the basis of other sources, such as
1984:
1946:
1886:
1791:
1644:
1492:
1419:
1374:
1335:
1161:
1073:
620:
543:
492:
422:
383:
67:
54:
2007:
The following sections discuss alternate methods for establishing notability in specific situations.
1816:
travel blogs) are newer and more prone to manipulation by marketing and public relations personnel.
1307:
A scholarly article, a book passage, or ongoing media coverage focusing on a product or organization,
2763:
2723:
2402:) likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion.
2206:
1992:
1910:
1525:
1178:
Examples of trivial coverage that do not count toward meeting the significant coverage requirement:
510:
2776:, the inclusion counts like any other reliable source, but it does not exempt the article from the
1048:
588:
2529:
1710:
642:
1131:
696:
584:
407:
to the organization or product. Notability requires only that these necessary sources have been
2558:
2525:
1397:
608:
319:
2511:
PU-36 Explosive Space
Modulator, Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator, R-36 Explosive Space Modulator
2324:
or both. The fact that a religious building is listed on a major historic register such as the
1842:
Be independent: Many reviews are not independent and are, in fact, a type of advertisement and
1319:
An extensive how-to guide written by people wholly independent of the company or product (e.g.
597:
significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject
1861:
1843:
1670:
1445:
1310:
A documentary film exploring environmental impact of the corporation's facilities or products,
1125:
2777:
2546:
2521:
2114:
1914:
1820:
1441:
1392:
1300:
Examples of substantial coverage that would generally be sufficient to meet the requirement:
533:
440:
2233:. If an embedded list is too large, but is not notable enough for a stand-alone list, then
1980:
1964:
1836:
1747:
1682:
1665:
1621:
any material written or published, including websites, by the organization, its members, or
1589:
1556:
691:
2729:
2597:
2542:
2321:
2273:
2029:
1725:
1413:
730:
603:
452:
316:
separate Knowledge (XXG) article dedicated solely to that organization, product, or service
2213:
Information on sub-chapters of notable organizations might be included in either prose or
1819:
Like any other source, to be counted towards the notability requirements, reviews must be
1676:
1605:
1585:
441:
No organization is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of organization it is
330:
2491:
2094:
1714:
656:
475:
401:
127:
466:
reliable sources independent of the organization have given significant coverage to it.
2772:
2360:
organizations for the purpose of overtly or covertly advertising a company. Please see
1755:
1509:
1032:
358:
342:
2178:
471:
139:
135:
2817:
1484:
1135:. However, the reputation of the source does help to determine whether the source is
2803:
verified to be accurate by the patent offices or any other independent agency. See
2675:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
1472:), and other parties that have something, financially or otherwise, to gain or lose.
2708:, on the non-notability of run-of-the-mill organizations and routine media coverage
2506:
1609:
1469:
1455:
580:
576:
1230:
of the participation in industry events, such as trade fairs or panel discussions,
19:"WP:ORG", "WP:COMPANY" and "WP:CORP" redirect here. You may have been looking for
2429:
1569:
advertising and marketing materials by, about, or on behalf of the organization,
1365:
regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary.
1316:
A report by a consumer watchdog organization on the safety of a specific product,
891:
Most such posts are company-sponsored or based on company's marketing materials.
2767:
2276:, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered
1697:(greater availability of recent sources) when assessing historical companies or
1321:
572:
354:
346:
338:
2042:, especially with regards to avoiding indiscriminate inclusion of information.
1304:
A news article discussing a prolonged controversy regarding a corporate merger,
2486:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability § Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines
1968:
1821:
independent secondary sources that contain significant coverage of the subject
1630:
1597:
1563:
1480:
1449:
2225:
only if there are reliable sources dealing with the list as a topic, as with
1020:
There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements
447:. If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from
1460:. There are two types of independence to consider when evaluating sources:
1353:
1250:
of non-notable awards received by the organization, its people, or products,
746:
The analysis of the above example can be summarized in the following table:
666:; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.
334:
1535:
be used with appropriate care to verify some of the article's content. See
1313:
An encyclopedia entry giving an overview of the history of an organization,
1239:
of the expansions, acquisitions, mergers, sale, or closure of the business,
2726:, WikiProject Military History essay on notability of units and formations
2720:, on the notability provided by professional and reliable critical reviews
2592:
Content about the organization can be added into relevant articles if it:
1278:
presentations, speeches, lectures, etc. given by organization's personnel,
1191:
of employees, officers, directors, owners, or shareholders (see above for
1976:
1185:
of telephone numbers, addresses, directions, event times, shopping hours,
2732:, on notability for Internet related, computing, and services businesses
1593:
1227:
of a product or a product line launch, sale, change, or discontinuance,
568:
350:
2805:
Knowledge (XXG):Reliable source examples#Are patents reliable sources?
1487:
that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.
1253:
of sponsorship of events, non-profit organizations, or volunteer work,
1215:
standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage, such as:
1847:
1615:
1581:
702:
2090:
The scope of their activities is national or international in scale.
1271:
coverage of purely local events, incidents, controversies (see also
378:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability § Notability requires verifiable evidence
16:
Knowledge (XXG) policy for notability of organizations and companies
1828:
1224:
of the opening or closing of local branches, franchises, or shops,
1201:
of product instruction manuals, specifications, or certifications,
1436:
A primary test of notability is whether unrelated people with no
1391:
It is possible that an organization that is not itself generally
2680:
Knowledge (XXG):When your boss tells you to edit Knowledge (XXG)
2391:
1857:
1256:
in quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources,
2093:
The organization has received significant coverage in multiple
1577:
any paid or sponsored articles, posts, and other publications,
1221:
of quarterly or annual financial results and earning forecasts,
830:
A single-sentence mention in an article about another company.
694:
cites four sources: a single-sentence mention in an article by
1452:
do not count towards qualifying for an encyclopedia article.
1027:
439:
No company or organization is considered inherently notable.
108:
29:
361:, for-profit educational institutions or organizations, etc.
2520:
If a non-notable product or service has its own article, be
1129:
is a lot more significant than a single-sentence mention in
1031:
645:
addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
2647:(for companies that are creating articles about themselves)
1769:
public announcements of corporate actions (press releases),
1188:
of office locations, branches, franchises, or subsidiaries,
2714:, and what to be aware of when creating an article on one
538:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability § General notability guideline
53:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
1763:
corporate annual or financial reports, proxy statements,
1233:
of the shareholders' meetings or other corporate events,
2579:
2572:
2475:
2468:
2461:
2419:
2381:
2350:
2311:
2304:
2262:
2255:
2155:
2073:
2066:
2059:
1954:
1894:
1806:
1799:
1726:
although they may be reliable for verification purposes
1652:
1500:
1427:
1382:
1343:
1169:
1088:
1081:
628:
558:
551:
500:
430:
391:
96:
89:
82:
75:
2003:
Alternate criteria for specific types of organizations
126:
if it has been the subject of significant coverage in
2434:
Shell Service Station (Winston-Salem, North Carolina)
1827:
Be significant: Brief and routine reviews (including
1204:
of patents, copyrights, clinical trials, or lawsuits,
1919:
Erase remaining advertising content from the article
1236:
of the hiring, promotion, or departure of personnel,
1285:The examples above are not meant to be exhaustive.
2712:Knowledge (XXG):Businesses with a single location
2696:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
2122:Factors that have attracted widespread attention:
1242:of a capital transaction, such as raised capital,
1668:) reprinted in multiple newspapers (say, in the
1580:including pieces by non-staff "contributors" to
2691:Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not LinkedIn
2227:Baird's Manual of American College Fraternities
2082:Organizations are usually notable if they meet
688:
41:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
2640:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (companies)
1781:product instruction manuals or specifications.
1751:significant, reliable or independent sources.
2780:that independent sources discuss the subject.
2685:Knowledge (XXG):Stern warning about promotion
1997:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (cryptocurrencies)
1941:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (cryptocurrencies)
295:
8:
2600:of detail and significance for that article;
1928:Knowledge (XXG):Criteria for speedy deletion
1730:Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources
1192:
1043:Tip: How to create a source assessment table
2231:List of Phi Kappa Psi chapters and colonies
2115:substantial verifiable evidence of coverage
2040:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
1396:sources, under different guidelines, e.g.,
1113:does not determine significance. It is the
49:Editors should generally follow it, though
2110:Nationally well-known local organizations:
1182:simple listings or compilations, such as:
1147:Significant coverage of the company itself
302:
288:
146:
2718:Knowledge (XXG):Every snowflake is unique
1971:-related projects, the consensus is that
479:companies are typically unacceptable per
2701:Knowledge (XXG):Places of local interest
2658:, style guideline for lists of companies
1140:
748:
457:
122:An organization is generally considered
2742:
2196:Aim for one good article, not multiple
1775:government audit or inspection reports,
1555:press releases, press kits, or similar
1547:Examples of dependent coverage that is
252:
163:
156:
149:
2609:only includes information that can be
2492:reliable independent secondary sources
1851:Therefore, editors should use reviews
602:These criteria, generally, follow the
372:Decisions based on verifiable evidence
2824:Knowledge (XXG) notability guidelines
2038:the article complies with the policy
2019:
1924:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
1136:
7:
2330:National Register of Historic Places
1963:When establishing the notability of
1922:Delete the article by listing it at
1835:). For example, a review of a local
1778:customer testimonials or complaints,
1766:memoirs or interviews by executives,
1551:sufficient to establish notability:
1289:
1247:brief or passing mentions, such as:
2142:Local units of larger organizations
1772:court filings, patent applications,
1218:of changes in share or bond prices,
2778:normal value of providing evidence
2664:, on notability of business people
2326:National Heritage List for England
1623:sources closely associated with it
57:. When in doubt, discuss first on
14:
2280:and must satisfy those criteria.
1973:crypto-centric news organizations
2547:Notability (geographic features)
2274:the general notability guideline
1524:Once notability is established,
1296:Examples of substantial coverage
1198:of product or service offerings,
997:
987:
977:
967:
957:
939:
929:
919:
909:
899:
881:
871:
861:
851:
841:
820:
810:
800:
790:
780:
690:Imagine that a draft article on
112:
33:
2706:Knowledge (XXG):Run-of-the-mill
2513:, etc.) especially if there is
2105:Additional considerations are:
2753:, especially for universities.
2515:no realistic hope of expansion
2442:San Ysidro McDonald's massacre
1720:the more reliable the source.
1543:Examples of dependent coverage
655:Meet the standard for being a
595:if it has been the subject of
1:
2645:Knowledge (XXG):Autobiography
2543:General notability guidelines
2132:mean that its activities are
1832:
1618:, whether pending or granted,
1537:Knowledge (XXG):Autobiography
1272:
2651:Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Business
2368:Publicly traded corporations
2322:general notability guideline
2086:of the following standards:
2046:Non-commercial organizations
2030:general notability guideline
1519:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
1156:Examples of trivial coverage
604:general notability guideline
444:
158:General notability guideline
2630:section of the small town.
2552:
2281:
1999:may offer useful guidance.
1100:very brief, incomplete stub
455:
276:Why was my article deleted?
225:Organizations and companies
165:Subject-specific guidelines
2845:
2562:
2556:
2483:
2451:
2409:
2371:
2340:
2294:
2245:
2145:
2049:
1944:
1938:
1884:
1789:
1739:
1708:
1642:
1490:
1417:
1407:
1372:
1333:
1159:
1102:about the organization.
1071:
618:
541:
531:
508:
490:
420:
381:
375:
65:
59:this guideline's talk page
18:
2015:these alternate criteria,
1881:Advertising and promotion
1625:, directly or indirectly,
1011:
615:How to apply the criteria
609:advertising and promotion
21:WikiProject Organizations
2536:Transport infrastructure
2440:, not the location (see
2337:Commercial organizations
2278:commercial organizations
1193:#No inherited notability
1012:Total qualifying sources
327:charitable organizations
271:Common deletion outcomes
120:This page in a nutshell:
2333:building is an option.
2291:Religious organizations
2207:Knowledge (XXG):Merging
1448:, or any other form of
652:of the article subject.
487:No inherited notability
470:more readily available
2762:If the list itself is
1530:self-published sources
1036:
743:
731:subject-matter experts
417:No inherent notability
366:WP:Notability (people)
2829:WikiProject Companies
2604:avoids self-promotion
2557:Further information:
2448:Products and services
2406:Chains and franchises
1939:Further information:
1608:materials, including
1035:
509:Further information:
458:§ If it's not notable
25:WikiProject Companies
2101:of the organization.
1915:Knowledge (XXG):NPOV
1807:WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS
1722:Questionable sources
1475:Independence of the
1464:Independence of the
1210:of statistical data,
1123:400-word article in
1068:Significant coverage
643:significant coverage
182:Astronomical objects
43:notability guideline
2615:independent sources
2553:If it's not notable
2549:continue to apply.
2022:for organizations,
1404:Independent sources
1056:Source assess table
1049:User:DannyS712/SATG
449:independent sources
237:Sports and athletes
206:Geographic features
2662:WP:NBUSINESSPERSON
2530:deletion processes
2174:within the context
1862:review aggregators
1510:Trade publications
1132:The New York Times
1037:
776:The New York Times
697:The New York Times
515:WP:NBUSINESSPERSON
2751:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES
2598:appropriate level
2444:for an example).
2362:WP:NOTADVERTISING
2284:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES
2235:consider trimming
1848:Sponsored reviews
1844:product placement
1736:Secondary sources
1671:Los Angeles Times
1446:product placement
1126:The Village Voice
1065:
1064:
1026:
1025:
674:source must meet
481:WP:NOTADVERTISING
474:information from
331:political parties
312:
311:
266:Guide to deletion
261:Notability essays
145:
144:
132:secondary sources
107:
106:
2836:
2808:
2797:
2791:
2787:
2781:
2760:
2754:
2747:
2582:
2575:
2512:
2478:
2471:
2464:
2422:
2384:
2353:
2314:
2307:
2287:
2265:
2258:
2223:stand-alone list
2191:
2185:
2158:
2095:reliable sources
2076:
2069:
2062:
2020:primary criteria
1981:Bitcoin Magazine
1965:cryptocurrencies
1957:
1935:Cryptocurrencies
1897:
1837:harvest festival
1809:
1802:
1748:secondary source
1705:Reliable sources
1683:Orlando Sentinel
1655:
1639:Multiple sources
1590:Entrepreneur.com
1557:public relations
1503:
1430:
1385:
1346:
1290:#Product reviews
1172:
1091:
1084:
1060:
1054:
1051:or the template
1045:
1028:
1021:
1004:
1001:
1000:
994:
991:
990:
984:
981:
980:
974:
971:
970:
964:
961:
960:
946:
943:
942:
936:
933:
932:
926:
923:
922:
916:
913:
912:
906:
903:
902:
888:
885:
884:
878:
875:
874:
868:
865:
864:
858:
855:
854:
848:
845:
844:
827:
824:
823:
817:
814:
813:
807:
804:
803:
797:
794:
793:
787:
784:
783:
749:
664:secondary source
631:
561:
554:
528:Primary criteria
503:
476:reliable sources
461:
433:
402:reliable sources
394:
304:
297:
290:
147:
116:
115:
109:
99:
92:
85:
78:
37:
36:
30:
2844:
2843:
2839:
2838:
2837:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2814:
2813:
2812:
2811:
2798:
2794:
2788:
2784:
2761:
2757:
2748:
2744:
2739:
2636:
2586:
2585:
2578:
2571:
2567:
2561:
2555:
2538:
2510:
2500:Avoid splitting
2488:
2482:
2481:
2474:
2467:
2460:
2456:
2450:
2426:
2425:
2418:
2414:
2408:
2388:
2387:
2380:
2376:
2370:
2357:
2356:
2349:
2345:
2339:
2318:
2317:
2310:
2303:
2299:
2293:
2269:
2268:
2261:
2254:
2250:
2244:
2198:permanent stubs
2189:
2183:
2162:
2161:
2154:
2150:
2144:
2080:
2079:
2072:
2065:
2058:
2054:
2048:
2005:
1961:
1960:
1953:
1949:
1943:
1937:
1901:
1900:
1893:
1889:
1883:
1878:
1813:
1812:
1805:
1798:
1794:
1788:
1786:Product reviews
1744:
1738:
1717:
1707:
1677:Chicago Tribune
1659:
1658:
1651:
1647:
1641:
1586:Huffington Post
1545:
1526:primary sources
1507:
1506:
1499:
1495:
1438:vested interest
1434:
1433:
1426:
1422:
1416:
1406:
1389:
1388:
1381:
1377:
1371:
1369:Illegal conduct
1350:
1349:
1342:
1338:
1332:
1298:
1176:
1175:
1168:
1164:
1158:
1149:
1108:
1106:Numerical facts
1095:
1094:
1087:
1080:
1076:
1070:
1058:
1052:
1046:
1041:
1022:
1019:
1002:
998:
992:
988:
982:
978:
972:
968:
962:
958:
944:
940:
934:
930:
924:
920:
914:
910:
904:
900:
886:
882:
876:
872:
866:
862:
856:
852:
846:
842:
825:
821:
815:
811:
805:
801:
795:
791:
785:
781:
744:
687:
635:
634:
627:
623:
617:
565:
564:
557:
550:
546:
540:
530:
517:
507:
506:
499:
495:
489:
437:
436:
429:
425:
419:
398:
397:
390:
386:
380:
374:
359:proprietorships
343:interest groups
308:
248:
113:
103:
102:
95:
88:
81:
74:
70:
62:
34:
28:
17:
12:
11:
5:
2842:
2840:
2832:
2831:
2826:
2816:
2815:
2810:
2809:
2792:
2782:
2773:Michelin Guide
2766:, such as the
2755:
2741:
2740:
2738:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2727:
2721:
2715:
2709:
2703:
2698:
2693:
2688:
2682:
2677:
2666:
2665:
2659:
2656:WP:LISTCOMPANY
2653:
2648:
2642:
2635:
2632:
2619:
2618:
2607:
2601:
2584:
2583:
2576:
2568:
2563:
2554:
2551:
2537:
2534:
2480:
2479:
2472:
2465:
2457:
2452:
2449:
2446:
2424:
2423:
2415:
2410:
2407:
2404:
2386:
2385:
2377:
2372:
2369:
2366:
2355:
2354:
2346:
2341:
2338:
2335:
2316:
2315:
2308:
2300:
2295:
2292:
2289:
2267:
2266:
2259:
2251:
2246:
2243:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2211:
2193:
2170:
2160:
2159:
2151:
2146:
2143:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2126:
2119:
2103:
2102:
2091:
2078:
2077:
2070:
2063:
2055:
2050:
2047:
2044:
2033:
2032:
2026:
2016:
2004:
2001:
1959:
1958:
1950:
1945:
1936:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1920:
1917:
1899:
1898:
1890:
1885:
1882:
1879:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1869:
1840:
1811:
1810:
1803:
1795:
1790:
1787:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1779:
1776:
1773:
1770:
1767:
1764:
1756:primary source
1737:
1734:
1706:
1703:
1657:
1656:
1653:WP:MULTSOURCES
1648:
1643:
1640:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1626:
1619:
1613:
1606:self-published
1603:
1602:
1601:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1567:
1560:
1544:
1541:
1505:
1504:
1496:
1491:
1489:
1488:
1473:
1456:unpaid sources
1442:Self-promotion
1432:
1431:
1423:
1418:
1410:WP:INDEPENDENT
1405:
1402:
1387:
1386:
1378:
1373:
1370:
1367:
1348:
1347:
1339:
1334:
1331:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1317:
1314:
1311:
1308:
1305:
1297:
1294:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1276:
1269:
1265:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1254:
1251:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1240:
1237:
1234:
1231:
1228:
1225:
1222:
1219:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1208:
1205:
1202:
1199:
1196:
1189:
1186:
1174:
1173:
1165:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1148:
1145:
1107:
1104:
1093:
1092:
1085:
1077:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1063:
1062:
1040:
1038:
1024:
1023:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1005:
995:
985:
975:
965:
955:
951:
950:
947:
937:
927:
917:
907:
897:
896:Tech blog post
893:
892:
889:
879:
869:
859:
849:
839:
832:
831:
828:
818:
808:
798:
788:
778:
772:
771:
768:
765:
762:
759:
756:
753:
739:
738:
734:
726:
715:
712:New York Times
685:
684:
668:
667:
660:
653:
648:Be completely
646:
633:
632:
624:
619:
616:
613:
563:
562:
555:
547:
542:
529:
526:
505:
504:
496:
491:
488:
485:
465:
435:
434:
426:
421:
418:
415:
396:
395:
387:
382:
373:
370:
310:
309:
307:
306:
299:
292:
284:
281:
280:
279:
278:
273:
268:
263:
255:
254:
250:
249:
247:
246:
240:
239:
234:
228:
227:
221:
220:
215:
209:
208:
202:
201:
196:
191:
185:
184:
178:
177:
171:
168:
167:
161:
160:
154:
153:
143:
142:
130:, independent
117:
105:
104:
101:
100:
93:
86:
79:
71:
66:
63:
48:
47:
38:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2841:
2830:
2827:
2825:
2822:
2821:
2819:
2806:
2802:
2796:
2793:
2786:
2783:
2779:
2775:
2774:
2769:
2765:
2759:
2756:
2752:
2749:But see also
2746:
2743:
2736:
2731:
2728:
2725:
2722:
2719:
2716:
2713:
2710:
2707:
2704:
2702:
2699:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2689:
2686:
2683:
2681:
2678:
2676:
2673:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2663:
2660:
2657:
2654:
2652:
2649:
2646:
2643:
2641:
2638:
2637:
2633:
2631:
2629:
2625:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2605:
2602:
2599:
2595:
2594:
2593:
2590:
2581:
2577:
2574:
2570:
2569:
2566:
2560:
2550:
2548:
2544:
2535:
2533:
2531:
2527:
2523:
2518:
2516:
2508:
2507:product lines
2503:
2501:
2497:
2496:primary topic
2493:
2487:
2477:
2473:
2470:
2466:
2463:
2459:
2458:
2455:
2447:
2445:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2431:
2421:
2417:
2416:
2413:
2405:
2403:
2401:
2396:
2393:
2383:
2379:
2378:
2375:
2367:
2365:
2363:
2352:
2351:WP:COMMERCIAL
2348:
2347:
2344:
2336:
2334:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2313:
2309:
2306:
2302:
2301:
2298:
2290:
2288:
2285:
2279:
2275:
2264:
2260:
2257:
2253:
2252:
2249:
2241:
2236:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2216:
2212:
2210:
2208:
2201:
2199:
2194:
2188:
2180:
2175:
2171:
2168:
2164:
2163:
2157:
2153:
2152:
2149:
2141:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2120:
2116:
2111:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2085:
2075:
2071:
2068:
2064:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2053:
2045:
2043:
2041:
2037:
2031:
2027:
2025:
2021:
2017:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2010:
2002:
2000:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1956:
1952:
1951:
1948:
1942:
1934:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1918:
1916:
1912:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1905:
1896:
1892:
1891:
1888:
1880:
1876:Special notes
1875:
1870:
1867:
1863:
1860:review (e.g.
1859:
1854:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1822:
1817:
1808:
1804:
1801:
1800:WP:PRODUCTREV
1797:
1796:
1793:
1785:
1780:
1777:
1774:
1771:
1768:
1765:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1757:
1752:
1749:
1743:
1735:
1733:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1716:
1712:
1704:
1702:
1700:
1699:systemic bias
1696:
1691:
1687:
1685:
1684:
1679:
1678:
1673:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1654:
1650:
1649:
1646:
1638:
1633:
1632:
1627:
1624:
1620:
1617:
1614:
1611:
1607:
1604:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1576:
1571:
1570:
1568:
1565:
1561:
1558:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1550:
1542:
1540:
1538:
1534:
1531:
1527:
1522:
1520:
1514:
1511:
1502:
1498:
1497:
1494:
1486:
1485:fact checking
1482:
1478:
1474:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1459:
1457:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1429:
1425:
1424:
1421:
1415:
1411:
1403:
1401:
1399:
1394:
1384:
1380:
1379:
1376:
1368:
1366:
1364:
1359:
1355:
1345:
1341:
1340:
1337:
1329:
1324:
1323:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1309:
1306:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1295:
1293:
1291:
1286:
1280:
1277:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1258:
1255:
1252:
1249:
1248:
1246:
1241:
1238:
1235:
1232:
1229:
1226:
1223:
1220:
1217:
1216:
1214:
1209:
1206:
1203:
1200:
1197:
1194:
1190:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1171:
1167:
1166:
1163:
1155:
1153:
1146:
1144:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1133:
1128:
1127:
1121:
1116:
1112:
1105:
1103:
1101:
1090:
1086:
1083:
1079:
1078:
1075:
1067:
1057:
1050:
1044:
1039:
1034:
1030:
1029:
1017:
1014:
1010:
1006:
996:
986:
976:
966:
956:
953:
952:
948:
938:
928:
918:
908:
898:
895:
894:
890:
880:
870:
860:
850:
840:
838:
834:
833:
829:
819:
809:
799:
789:
779:
777:
774:
773:
769:
766:
763:
760:
757:
754:
751:
750:
747:
742:
735:
732:
727:
724:
720:
716:
713:
709:
708:
707:
705:
704:
699:
698:
693:
683:
681:
677:
673:
665:
661:
658:
654:
651:
647:
644:
640:
639:
638:
630:
626:
625:
622:
614:
612:
610:
605:
600:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
560:
556:
553:
549:
548:
545:
539:
535:
527:
525:
521:
516:
512:
502:
501:WP:INHERITORG
498:
497:
494:
486:
484:
482:
477:
473:
467:
463:
459:
454:
450:
446:
442:
432:
428:
427:
424:
416:
414:
412:
411:
406:
403:
393:
389:
388:
385:
379:
371:
369:
367:
362:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
323:
321:
317:
305:
300:
298:
293:
291:
286:
285:
283:
282:
277:
274:
272:
269:
267:
264:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
251:
245:
242:
241:
238:
235:
233:
230:
229:
226:
223:
222:
219:
216:
214:
211:
210:
207:
204:
203:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
186:
183:
180:
179:
176:
173:
172:
170:
169:
166:
162:
159:
155:
152:
148:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
118:
111:
110:
98:
94:
91:
87:
84:
80:
77:
73:
72:
69:
64:
60:
56:
52:
46:
44:
39:
32:
31:
26:
22:
2800:
2795:
2785:
2771:
2758:
2745:
2668:
2667:
2627:
2623:
2620:
2591:
2587:
2539:
2519:
2504:
2489:
2437:
2427:
2399:
2397:
2389:
2358:
2319:
2277:
2270:
2215:a brief list
2204:
2195:
2187:splitsection
2173:
2166:
2133:
2129:
2121:
2109:
2104:
2083:
2081:
2067:WP:NONPROFIT
2035:
2034:
2023:
2008:
2006:
1995:. The essay
1993:news sources
1988:
1972:
1962:
1902:
1865:
1852:
1818:
1814:
1753:
1745:
1742:WP:SECONDARY
1718:
1692:
1688:
1681:
1675:
1669:
1663:
1660:
1629:
1610:vanity press
1548:
1546:
1532:
1523:
1515:
1508:
1476:
1470:astroturfing
1465:
1453:
1435:
1390:
1362:
1357:
1351:
1320:
1299:
1287:
1284:
1177:
1150:
1130:
1124:
1119:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1096:
1082:WP:CORPDEPTH
1042:
954:Court filing
836:
775:
758:Independent?
755:Significant?
745:
740:
723:WP:FORBESCON
718:
711:
701:
695:
689:
679:
675:
671:
669:
636:
601:
596:
592:
591:is presumed
577:organization
566:
522:
518:
468:
443:, including
438:
409:
404:
399:
363:
355:partnerships
347:social clubs
339:institutions
324:
315:
313:
224:
119:
40:
2768:Fortune 500
2580:WP:FAILCORP
2476:WP:NPRODUCT
2469:WP:PRODUCTS
2263:WP:NHSCHOOL
2229:supporting
2130:necessarily
2125:conclusive.
2099:independent
1985:WP:ORGCRITE
1904:Advertising
1322:For Dummies
1141:independent
1089:WP:ORGDEPTH
835:Profile in
650:independent
573:corporation
552:WP:ORGCRITE
376:Main page:
244:Web content
2818:Categories
2724:WP:MILUNIT
2573:WP:FAILORG
2484:See also:
2462:WP:PRODUCT
2430:McDonald's
2312:WP:NCHURCH
2305:WP:NRELORG
2282:(See also
2256:WP:NSCHOOL
2179:notability
1989:mainstream
1969:blockchain
1967:and other
1955:WP:NCRYPTO
1895:WP:ADPROMO
1740:See also:
1709:See also:
1680:, and the
1598:TechCrunch
1564:churnalism
1481:churnalism
1450:paid media
1408:See also:
1170:WP:ORGTRIV
764:Secondary?
703:Forbes.com
686:An example
672:individual
559:WP:ORGCRIT
532:See also:
511:WP:PRODUCT
472:verifiable
151:Notability
136:verifiable
51:exceptions
2565:Shortcuts
2454:Shortcuts
2382:WP:LISTED
2297:Shortcuts
2248:Shortcuts
2221:out as a
2219:splitting
2156:WP:BRANCH
2097:that are
2052:Shortcuts
1991:reliable
1975:—such as
1833:#Audience
1792:Shortcuts
1711:WP:SOURCE
1695:recentism
1631:Who's Who
1559:materials
1501:WP:TRADES
1428:WP:ORGIND
1383:WP:ILLCON
1273:#Audience
1268:almanacs,
1074:Shortcuts
767:Pass/Fail
761:Reliable?
737:outcome).
692:Acme Inc.
544:Shortcuts
453:it exists
431:WP:ORGSIG
410:published
405:unrelated
351:companies
335:hospitals
175:Academics
68:Shortcuts
55:consensus
2790:stories.
2770:and the
2634:See also
2613:through
2611:verified
2596:has the
2559:WP:FAILN
2420:WP:CHAIN
2412:Shortcut
2374:Shortcut
2343:Shortcut
2148:Shortcut
2118:instead.
1977:Coindesk
1947:Shortcut
1930:instead.
1911:Clean up
1887:Shortcut
1645:Shortcut
1493:Shortcut
1420:Shortcut
1398:WP:CRIME
1375:Shortcut
1354:regional
1336:Shortcut
1330:Audience
1162:Shortcut
1137:reliable
1111:Quantity
680:multiple
657:reliable
641:Contain
621:Shortcut
493:Shortcut
460:, below)
423:Shortcut
392:WP:ORGIN
384:Shortcut
320:WP:MUSIC
253:See also
128:reliable
97:WP:NCORP
2764:notable
2669:Essays:
2628:Economy
2624:History
2400:certain
2328:or the
2242:Schools
2060:WP:CLUB
1616:patents
1594:Inc.com
1477:content
1393:notable
1275:below),
1120:discuss
1115:quality
659:source.
629:WP:SIRS
593:notable
589:service
585:product
569:company
534:WP:PSTS
445:schools
218:Numbers
124:notable
90:WP:CORP
83:WP:NORG
2730:WP:B2B
2167:unless
2074:WP:NGO
1674:, the
1582:Forbes
1466:author
1414:WP:COI
1358:solely
1344:WP:AUD
837:Forbes
770:Notes
752:Source
719:Forbes
464:unless
232:People
194:Events
76:WP:ORG
2737:Notes
2606:; and
2526:merge
2438:event
2137:live.
2134:truly
1829:Zagat
1715:WP:RS
1458:count
1454:Only
662:Be a
587:, or
581:group
456:(see
213:Music
199:Films
189:Books
2545:and
2524:and
2522:bold
2505:For
2392:NYSE
2205:See
2084:both
2028:the
2018:the
1913:per
1858:meta
1853:only
1713:and
1528:and
1412:and
1288:See
1139:and
717:The
710:The
536:and
513:and
2801:not
2626:or
2036:and
1979:or
1866:may
1549:not
1533:may
1363:one
676:all
670:An
599:.
322:.
23:or
2820::
2532:.
2498:.
2364:.
2286:.)
2190:}}
2184:{{
2024:or
1846:.
1823::
1754:A
1746:A
1732:.
1666:AP
1634:).
1596:,
1592:,
1588:,
1584:,
1566:),
1521:.
1444:,
1400:.
1325:).
1195:),
1143:.
1059:}}
1053:{{
733:).
725:).
583:,
579:,
575:,
571:,
567:A
483:.
368:.
357:,
353:,
349:,
345:,
341:,
337:,
333:,
329:,
138:.
2807:.
2687:‎
2617:.
2237:.
2209:.
2200::
2192:.
1612:,
1061:.
1015:0
1003:N
993:N
983:Y
973:N
963:Y
945:N
935:Y
925:N
915:?
905:Y
887:N
877:Y
867:N
857:N
847:Y
826:N
816:Y
806:Y
796:Y
786:N
303:e
296:t
289:v
61:.
45:.
27:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.