35:
91:
150:
of responsible
Wikipedians supporting it, not personally select which is the better policy. The closer is not expected to decide the issue, just to judge the result of the debate, and is expected to know policy sufficiently to know what arguments are to be excluded as irrelevant." (emphasis added)
154:
What this means in practice is although consensus is voting, it is weighted, not all votes count, nor count the same. IPs, accounts created five minutes before posting a vote, and editors who are obviously bat-shit crazy probably will not have their votes counted, or counted less than established
113:, most often by an editor on the short end of a vote. Any serious evaluation of common Knowledge (XXG) practices leads to the realization this is not true. If consensus was truly not voting, the following logical consequences would occur:
194:, there's no need to point out on-wiki that the editor is bat-shit crazy – just weigh the vote appropriately if you're a closer (possibly mentioning that the argument
146:: "If the discussion shows that some people think one policy is controlling, and some another, the closer is expected to close by judging which view has the
214:
224:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
51:
164:
219:
191:
143:
131:
139:
55:
117:
Votes of the form "support per nom" or "oppose per John Doe" would be ignored as pointlessly redundant.
65:
124:
170:
43:
100:
208:
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
17:
85:
29:
173:– a list of policies and essays on voting in Knowledge (XXG)
198:
does not conform to
Knowledge (XXG) rules and practice).
73:
167:– centralized links to all votings, elections etc.
120:We wouldn't care about socking in discussions.
8:
109:Oft-heard on Knowledge (XXG) is the notion
52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
183:
215:Knowledge (XXG) essays about consensus
165:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Democracy
7:
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
225:Knowledge (XXG) surveys and polls
89:
33:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
144:information page which explains
1:
241:
220:Knowledge (XXG) discussion
63:
111:Consensus is not voting!
97:This page in a nutshell:
123:We wouldn't care about
171:Knowledge (XXG):Voting
54:, as it has not been
192:no personal attacks
148:predominant number
140:policy page itself
130:There would be no
18:Knowledge (XXG):OF
196:is bat-shit crazy
107:
106:
84:
83:
16:(Redirected from
232:
199:
188:
93:
92:
86:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
240:
239:
235:
234:
233:
231:
230:
229:
205:
204:
203:
202:
189:
185:
180:
161:
101:weighted voting
90:
80:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
238:
236:
228:
227:
222:
217:
207:
206:
201:
200:
182:
181:
179:
176:
175:
174:
168:
160:
157:
136:
135:
128:
121:
118:
105:
104:
94:
82:
81:
78:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
237:
226:
223:
221:
218:
216:
213:
212:
210:
197:
193:
187:
184:
177:
172:
169:
166:
163:
162:
158:
156:
152:
149:
145:
141:
138:In fact, the
133:
129:
126:
122:
119:
116:
115:
114:
112:
102:
99:Consensus is
98:
95:
88:
87:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
195:
186:
153:
147:
142:links to an
137:
110:
108:
96:
41:
42:This is an
209:Categories
125:canvassing
155:editors.
190:Per our
159:See also
66:Shortcut
134:closes.
178:Notes
74:WP:OF
44:essay
132:snow
211::
127:.
103:.
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.