157:. Most of the problems voiced at the time seemed to relate to prose issues. I've done some cleaning up myself, but I wanted to bring it forward for a peer review before I went back to FAC. Comments on any prose issues, and/or anything else that you feel might come up at a FAC review, would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! —
154:
126:
192:'Federal authorities began an investigation into the trio after they made alleged racist threats against Obama while taking methamphetamine in the hotel room.' Do the Feds routinely hang out in methhead bull sessions?
122:
107:
99:
115:
92:
213:
May be worth mentioning Dr. Boone is of a black university; I rather disagree with his assessment and was not surprised to see what kind of university he was from.
198:'Gartrell was driving to buy cigarettes when he was arrested at about 1:30 a.m. on August 24.' Why was he arrested then? Where are we in time from the meth?
76:
180:
207:'However, Johnson also told the reporter he came to the conclusion that there was assassination plot only after'; I accidentally the whole article.
204:'The truck contained enough drug-making equipment for the vehicle to be considered "a mobile lab".' This some sort of legal definition or finding?
44:
242:
169:
69:
226:
174:
189:'where they mistakenly believed Obama was staying (in fact, Obama was staying at another Denver hotel)' - redundant.
62:
50:
164:
17:
159:
223:
219:'Comparison' could benefit from identifying who was suggesting the conspiracy theories.
236:
210:'massive arsenal'? My parents own more guns than are listed in the Arrests section!
186:
The allegeds are a bit silly; like passive voice but for epistemology.
216:
May want to sectionize
Histories - that in effect 2 small bios.
201:'what appeared to be methamphetamine' - surely we know by now?
141:
134:
103:
153:
It's been the required two weeks since this article
28:2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Denver
70:
8:
150:This peer review discussion has been closed.
77:
63:
32:
35:
7:
24:
1:
181:02:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
229:22:49 22 January 2010 (GMT)
259:
243:February 2010 peer reviews
195:What day was this anyway?
155:failed to pass at FAC
18:Knowledge:Peer review
142:Watch peer review
87:
86:
250:
177:
172:
167:
162:
139:
130:
111:
79:
72:
65:
47:
33:
258:
257:
253:
252:
251:
249:
248:
247:
233:
232:
175:
170:
165:
160:
145:
120:
97:
91:
83:
51:Manual of Style
43:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
256:
254:
246:
245:
235:
234:
231:
230:
220:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
152:
147:
146:
144:
90:
85:
84:
82:
81:
74:
67:
59:
56:
55:
54:
53:
48:
38:
37:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
255:
244:
241:
240:
238:
228:
225:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
184:
183:
182:
179:
178:
173:
168:
163:
156:
151:
143:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
89:
88:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
61:
60:
58:
57:
52:
49:
46:
45:Copying check
42:
41:
40:
39:
34:
29:
26:
19:
158:
149:
148:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
27:
104:visual edit
227:(contribs)
222:'snet' --
237:Category
127:history
108:history
94:Article
36:Toolbox
224:Gwern
136:Watch
16:<
123:edit
100:edit
166:ter
161:Hun
239::
176:hn
171:Ka
140:•
125:|
106:|
102:|
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
78:e
71:t
64:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.