154:
428:"40 percent of the state budget" → percentages are given with the "%" symbol in the lead ("passed with 53.27% of the vote"), "Results" ("The measure was approved with 53% of the vote"), and "Aftermath" ("with only 7% of newly eligible Missourians"), so either this should be changed to the symbol or all of those instances should be spelled out (though I would go for the former)
371:"The measure was supported most in urban areas and opposed by conservatives" → this sounds like a strict dichotomy is being made between urban areas and conservative voters, which is not strictly incorrect but I would set this up differently. Maybe "supported most by liberal voters and opposed by conservatives" or "...and opposed in rural areas"
171:
I've listed this article for peer review because I am considering an FAC push for this page but am unaware of how high the bar is for FA. I am especially unfamiliar with the standard for
Featured Article Criteria 1a-c (well written, comprehensive, and using high-quality sources). As well, I am unsure
402:
The deadline for the state to implement the specified
Medicaid expansion would be July 1, 2021" → is this a part of the amendment or supplementary information? If it's just there to let the reader know when the deadline was, then the present tense sounds out of place and I would change this to "was
285:
I've gone through all of your suggestions and implemented them, though some were modified, for example "conservative-leaning" seems better than "conservative-voting" to me. I've added the (attempted) raised bar too. I'll probably leave this open for a bit longer and nominate in August (maybe on the
472:"In early 2022, the state found it was taking 70 days to process" → this sentence doesn't have to be about what the state found it was doing, you can just make it about what the state was doing: "In early 2022, the state was taking 70 days..."
230:
I'm sorry this took so long but I have some time to give this a look now. Comments are below, I'm just treating this like I would if it were at FAC. Overall the article is very well-done, just some picky things below!
530:
Having an identical website and publisher isn't necessary (like "Missouri
Secretary of State" in FN 8 or "CNN/Cable News Network" in FN 12 and 13). I'd just fill in "website" in these cases.
452:"The year following the measure's passage" → couldn't hurt to give a date here, though keeping "the year following..." would also be ideal here to give the reader some sense of a timescale
176:
to set a higher bar for the passage of future ballot initiatives. I think it is not relevant enough to be included in the article, though I would like outside input on that.
126:
122:
541:
337:
Also, as a note: the AP link you provided about the raised bar for future amendments directly mentions this one, so I think it's worth a mention in "Aftermath".
107:
76:
469:"compared to about half in Idaho and Montana" → recommend replacing "about half" to "about 50%", so it's clear you're not trying to say "about half of 7%"
99:
392:"in conservative states such as" → I would avoid labelling whole states as "conservative"; maybe use "conservative-voting" or something like that
202:
I'll give this one a read - this will be my first PR but I've got some experience at FAC so I'll try to give you some FAC-applicable comments.
173:
403:
July 1, 2021", or if you want to keep the sense of unknown surrounding whether it would pass or not, you can use "was to be July 1, 2021"
478:"However, after" → "However" isn't always a bad thing but I think here you can go without and just say "After a Supreme Court..." (see
295:
269:
188:
304:
Sounds good. If and when you get this up at FAC, give me a ping and I will give it another look there. Best of luck going forward!
463:" → this is repetitive (emphasis mine) - to solve this, I would cut the end of the sentence to read "...the 38th state to opt-in."
556:
69:
521:
Citations stand alone in their usage, so there is no problem with repeating the same link in many citations within an article.
353:
320:
247:
218:
115:
475:"passage of the initiative are unsustainable" → the rest of the sentence is past tense, but use of "are" is present tense
442:
53% of the vote, not exactly 53%, though you don't have to spell out "53.27%" since that's given right below in the table
360:
327:
299:
273:
254:
225:
192:
501:
44:
62:
92:
50:
466:"only 7% of newly eligible Missourians" → "newly-eligible" should be hyphenated since it's a compound adjective
519:), etc. Remember that duplicating the same link multiple times in the references section is totally fine (
17:
509:
479:
505:
347:
314:
241:
212:
288:
262:
181:
550:
338:
305:
280:
232:
203:
161:
524:
459:
began in
October 2021, with Missouri becoming the 38th state to opt into the
438:"approved with 53% of the vote" → indicate that it passed with just
260:
Thanks for the review! I'll get to these in the next two days. ~
425:
could not afford" → a little repetitive here (emphasis is mine)
148:
417:
Republican politicians such as
Governor Mike Parson, who
141:
134:
103:
382:was slow" → slightly repetitive (emphasis is mine)
172:about the relevance of this ballot initiative to
286:3rd anniversary of the 2020 primary election). ~
542:Category:Medicare and Medicaid (United States)
70:
8:
77:
63:
32:
35:
520:
7:
500:parameters in your references, like
492:I would recommend adding links to
24:
152:
1:
512:in FN 3 (also note that it's
502:Missouri Secretary of State
573:
328:00:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
361:18:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
300:15:50, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
274:05:14, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
255:18:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
226:18:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
193:01:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
28:2020 Missouri Amendment 2
557:June 2023 peer reviews
164:discussion is closed.
18:Knowledge:Peer review
517:National Law Review
510:National Law Review
455:"Enrollment in the
506:The New York Times
461:Medicaid expansion
457:Medicaid expansion
378:in October 2021.
359:
326:
253:
224:
169:
168:
142:Watch peer review
87:
86:
564:
540:Consider adding
499:
495:
374:"initiative was
366:Lead and infobox
356:
350:
345:
343:
323:
317:
312:
310:
291:
284:
265:
250:
244:
239:
237:
221:
215:
210:
208:
184:
174:a later proposal
156:
155:
149:
139:
130:
111:
79:
72:
65:
47:
33:
572:
571:
567:
566:
565:
563:
562:
561:
547:
546:
497:
493:
354:
348:
339:
321:
315:
306:
298:
289:
278:
272:
263:
248:
242:
233:
219:
213:
204:
200:
191:
182:
153:
145:
120:
97:
91:
83:
51:Manual of Style
43:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
570:
568:
560:
559:
549:
548:
545:
544:
532:
531:
528:
484:
483:
476:
473:
470:
467:
464:
453:
444:
443:
430:
429:
426:
405:
404:
394:
393:
384:
383:
380:Implementation
372:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
294:
268:
199:
196:
187:
167:
166:
157:
147:
146:
144:
90:
85:
84:
82:
81:
74:
67:
59:
56:
55:
54:
53:
48:
38:
37:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
569:
558:
555:
554:
552:
543:
539:
538:
537:
536:
529:
526:
522:
518:
516:
511:
507:
503:
491:
490:
489:
488:
481:
477:
474:
471:
468:
465:
462:
458:
454:
451:
450:
449:
448:
441:
437:
436:
435:
434:
427:
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:
410:
409:
401:
400:
399:
398:
391:
390:
389:
388:
381:
377:
373:
370:
369:
368:
367:
363:
362:
357:
351:
344:
342:
329:
324:
318:
311:
309:
303:
302:
301:
297:
293:
292:
282:
277:
276:
275:
271:
267:
266:
259:
258:
257:
256:
251:
245:
238:
236:
228:
227:
222:
216:
209:
207:
197:
195:
194:
190:
186:
185:
177:
175:
165:
163:
158:
151:
150:
143:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
89:
88:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
61:
60:
58:
57:
52:
49:
46:
45:Copying check
42:
41:
40:
39:
34:
29:
26:
19:
534:
533:
514:
513:
486:
485:
480:WP:EDITORIAL
460:
456:
446:
445:
439:
432:
431:
422:
418:
414:
413:"opposed by
407:
406:
396:
395:
386:
385:
379:
375:
365:
364:
340:
336:
307:
287:
261:
234:
229:
205:
201:
180:
178:
170:
159:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
27:
525:MOS:REFLINK
498:|publisher=
376:implemented
162:peer review
104:visual edit
535:Categories
487:References
387:Background
508:in FN 2,
504:in FN 1,
494:|website=
447:Aftermath
421:that the
179:Thanks, ~
551:Category
408:Campaign
397:Contents
355:contribs
341:PCN02WPS
322:contribs
308:PCN02WPS
281:PCN02WPS
249:contribs
235:PCN02WPS
220:contribs
206:PCN02WPS
198:PCN02WPS
433:Results
127:history
108:history
94:Article
36:Toolbox
419:stated
290:UN6892
264:UN6892
183:UN6892
423:state
415:state
160:This
136:Watch
16:<
496:and
440:over
349:talk
316:talk
243:talk
214:talk
123:edit
100:edit
515:The
553::
523:-
352:|
319:|
246:|
217:|
140:•
125:|
106:|
102:|
527:)
482:)
358:)
346:(
325:)
313:(
296:c
283::
279:@
270:c
252:)
240:(
223:)
211:(
189:c
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
78:e
71:t
64:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.