Knowledge

:Peer review/Auctionair/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

181:
The lead should be an accessible and inviting overview of the whole article. Nothing important should be in the lead only - since it is a summary, it should all be repeated in the body of the article itself. So the whole notion of sealed-bid auctions is only explicitly in the lead and should be in
191:
Biggest problem as I see it with the article right now is a lack of inline references (there are only two now). My rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs a ref. See
215:
External links are typically for things that are useful for understanding the subject of the article but are not used as references. The official website should be listed here, but I am not sure any of the others should be. See
222:
External links is not for links to Knowledge articles (those are internal links). These can be placed in a See also section, but that is usually for articles not already linked in the article (which
238:
There is a one sentence section and some short (one or two sentence) paragraphs - these break up the flow of the article and should be merged with others or perhaps expanded
185:
My rule of thumb is to include every header in the lead in some way - but as two examples, history and sale of unclaimed winning bids are not in the lead. Please see
212:
Most of the External links should be converted into inline references. At least one (Good Web Guide) is a dupicate of current ref 2, so should just be removed.
76: 260:(which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, 289: 241:
Any chance for a free image of the headquarters building or one of the key personnel? Business articles can use the company's logo as a
126: 232:
Please add more wikilinks to the article - The Times and many of the businesses mentioned could be linked, for example. Please see
122: 69: 107: 257: 99: 62: 50: 233: 256:
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at
17: 173:: this is a good start, especially for a first article, but it needs some more work to conform to the 153:
I've listed this article for peer review because this is my first article and I want to get it right!
44: 208:
In 2006 the company launched The Times Online Auction Room as a co-branded partnership with The Times
115: 275: 165: 265: 242: 227: 157: 92: 206:
references come AFTER punctuation, and are usually at the end of a sentence or phrase so fix
161: 261: 203: 193: 186: 283: 174: 217: 252:
for a British business example that is a Featured Article and may be a good model
249: 248:
A model article is useful for ideas and examples to follow - see the article on
197: 177:
and guidlelines here. So with improvement in mind, here are some suggestions.
223: 141: 134: 103: 70: 8: 150:This peer review discussion has been closed. 77: 63: 32: 35: 7: 24: 1: 258:Knowledge:Peer review/backlog 276:22:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 166:11:42, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 306: 290:February 2010 peer reviews 18:Knowledge:Peer review 171:Ruhrfisch comments 272: 226:already is). See 142:Watch peer review 87: 86: 297: 270: 234:WP:Build the web 182:the article too. 139: 130: 111: 79: 72: 65: 47: 33: 305: 304: 300: 299: 298: 296: 295: 294: 280: 279: 269: 175:Manual of Style 145: 120: 97: 91: 83: 51:Manual of Style 43: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 303: 301: 293: 292: 282: 281: 266: 254: 253: 246: 239: 236: 230: 220: 213: 210: 200: 189: 183: 152: 147: 146: 144: 90: 85: 84: 82: 81: 74: 67: 59: 56: 55: 54: 53: 48: 38: 37: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 302: 291: 288: 287: 285: 278: 277: 274: 273: 263: 259: 251: 247: 244: 240: 237: 235: 231: 229: 225: 221: 219: 214: 211: 209: 205: 201: 199: 195: 190: 188: 184: 180: 179: 178: 176: 172: 168: 167: 163: 159: 154: 151: 143: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 89: 88: 80: 75: 73: 68: 66: 61: 60: 58: 57: 52: 49: 46: 45:Copying check 42: 41: 40: 39: 34: 29: 26: 19: 264: 255: 207: 170: 169: 155: 149: 148: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 27: 250:BAE Systems 243:WP:FAIR USE 228:WP:See also 104:visual edit 28:Auctionair 268:<: --> 262:Ruhrfisch 284:Category 156:Thanks, 204:WP:CITE 194:WP:CITE 187:WP:LEAD 127:history 108:history 94:Article 36:Toolbox 224:Spafax 158:Ship69 267:: --> 245:image 218:WP:EL 136:Watch 16:< 202:Per 198:WP:V 196:and 162:talk 123:edit 100:edit 286:: 164:) 140:• 125:| 106:| 102:| 271:° 160:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:( 78:e 71:t 64:v

Index

Knowledge:Peer review
Auctionair
Copying check
Manual of Style
v
t
e
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
Ship69
talk
11:42, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Manual of Style
WP:LEAD
WP:CITE
WP:V
WP:CITE
WP:EL
Spafax
WP:See also
WP:Build the web
WP:FAIR USE
BAE Systems

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.