Knowledge

:Peer review/Blackford County, Indiana/archive2 - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

215:. At the suggestion of FineTooth, the Geography section was moved to the front, with the image map, to make it easier for the reader to relate to the History section. (I liked that suggestion.) During FA review, one reviewer did not like the Geography section, and wanted all references to communities to be removed from that section and added to History (not my preference). Some changes were made to the Geography section, but it seemed like the article was moving "in circles". 186:: I see that the article received a lengthy peer review from Finetooth in September. You made no responses to that review, or even an acknowledgement; peer reviewing is a pretty thankless task, and a word or two of thanks never goes amiss! I have not had time to review the article in detail, but a few points stood out from a fast skim:- 276:
Some of the prose seems a little heavy-footed. Example: "Shamrock Lakes is Blackford County's only incorporated town. Incorporated May 21, 1973, Shamrock Lakes was the only town to incorporate in Indiana in the previous 50 years." Note repetition of town's name, and "Incorporated ... incorporated ...
192:
Brianboulton—thank you for looking over Blackford County. I really do appreciate you taking the time, and I know this article is a little more lengthy than most. Finetooth and I communicated using our talk pages, and I made significant changes to Blackford County using his suggestions. He also
428:
A problem with using the Patent Footnote Template is that it links to Espacenet, which does not have old patents in its database. This causes an error. Perhaps I will try to "fake" the template (make it look like the template is being used when it really is not) to avoid the error
355:
I wonder what criteria were used to select the four notable people from the county? I am not doubting their notability, just curious about why these four only. Also, I think you should include birth and death (where appropriate) dates for all
323:
The location of the image map is a result the previous peer review and FA reveiw. I originally had it "higher" in the Geography section, and a subheader for unincorporated communities. I am open to suggestions.
233:
I wonder about the usefulness of a single set of coordinates for an area of over 400m². Is it some project requirement that these details are included? What point is actually fixed by these coordinates?
34: 443:
Patent templates are now still included, but commented out. Footnotes have appearance of template, but link to Google Patents (which works for these old patents) instead of Espacenet.
284:
I will try to work on that this weekend. It probably happened as a result of multiple edits. It may present a challenge, since "incorporate" is an important word in this instance.
135: 375:), but I do not believe those two are as famous as the four I already have listed. Crimmel and Cox were more famous regionally, while the other four had national impact. 474:
This is a very limited review, but it may be worth your considering these points and, at least as far as my prose comment is concerned, looking for similar instances.
316:
Image map: nice work on your part, but is its location in the "Extinct settlements" section the best placing, since it gives information on existing settlements, too?
131: 414:
Added footnotes for the patents. This leaves a footnote with some math/calculations, and a note about MapQuest, without some type of cite. Do these need cites?
116: 85: 367:
notable. A fifth person was dropped after the first peer reveiw. There are two additional people that could be added because they have Knowledge pages (
108: 497: 212: 166:) for peer review because it has been upgraded substantially, and I would like to get it to a featured article classification. 78: 124: 483: 466: 452: 438: 423: 409: 384: 346: 332: 307: 293: 267: 253: 224: 202: 178: 53: 71: 193:
edited a photo for me. Perhaps we should have used the peer review page for communication—my inexperience shows.
163: 101: 59: 479: 258:
All of the counties that had FA or GA status use a single set of coordinates for the center of the county.
241: 208: 17: 462: 448: 434: 419: 405: 380: 372: 342: 328: 303: 289: 263: 249: 220: 198: 174: 475: 240:
The coordinates are for the center of the county, which happens to be near the county seat.
491: 458: 444: 430: 415: 401: 376: 368: 338: 324: 299: 285: 259: 245: 216: 194: 170: 400:
Which footnotes? The patents note links to the patents—should they have a cite?
393:
Finally, I noticed that some of the footnotes contain uncited information.
363:
I will research their birth and death dates. These are really the four
244:, a featured article, also has coordinates for the center of the county. 337:
Moved the image map higher, next to a new subheader called Communities.
207:
Originally, Blackford County was patterned somewhat after
150: 143: 112: 298:
Cleaned up Shamrock Lakes, will check elsewhere too.
79: 8: 277:incorporate", all within two short sentences 159:This peer review discussion has been closed. 86: 72: 41: 457:All notes now have at least one citation. 44: 7: 213:Knowledge:WikiProject U.S. counties 24: 1: 467:22:40, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 453:23:41, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 439:20:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 424:20:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 347:20:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 308:20:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 268:20:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 484:01:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 410:18:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 385:18:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 333:18:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 294:18:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 254:18:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 225:22:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 203:18:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 179:15:59, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 514: 498:February 2012 peer reviews 162:I've listed this article ( 164:Blackford County, Indiana 28:Blackford County, Indiana 242:Warren County, Indiana 209:Warren County, Indiana 211:and the guidlines in 184:Brianboulton comments 18:Knowledge:Peer review 36:Previous peer review 373:Edward Everett Cox 151:Watch peer review 96: 95: 505: 148: 139: 120: 88: 81: 74: 56: 42: 513: 512: 508: 507: 506: 504: 503: 502: 488: 487: 154: 129: 106: 100: 92: 60:Manual of Style 52: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 511: 509: 501: 500: 490: 489: 472: 471: 470: 469: 455: 441: 426: 412: 395: 394: 390: 389: 388: 387: 358: 357: 352: 351: 350: 349: 335: 318: 317: 313: 312: 311: 310: 296: 279: 278: 273: 272: 271: 270: 256: 235: 234: 230: 229: 228: 227: 205: 161: 156: 155: 153: 99: 94: 93: 91: 90: 83: 76: 68: 65: 64: 63: 62: 57: 47: 46: 40: 39: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 510: 499: 496: 495: 493: 486: 485: 481: 477: 468: 464: 460: 456: 454: 450: 446: 442: 440: 436: 432: 427: 425: 421: 417: 413: 411: 407: 403: 399: 398: 397: 396: 392: 391: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 369:Henry Crimmel 366: 362: 361: 360: 359: 354: 353: 348: 344: 340: 336: 334: 330: 326: 322: 321: 320: 319: 315: 314: 309: 305: 301: 297: 295: 291: 287: 283: 282: 281: 280: 275: 274: 269: 265: 261: 257: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 238: 237: 236: 232: 231: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 204: 200: 196: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 185: 181: 180: 176: 172: 167: 165: 160: 152: 147: 146: 142: 137: 133: 128: 127: 123: 118: 114: 110: 105: 104: 98: 97: 89: 84: 82: 77: 75: 70: 69: 67: 66: 61: 58: 55: 54:Copying check 51: 50: 49: 48: 43: 38: 37: 33: 32: 29: 26: 19: 476:Brianboulton 473: 364: 183: 182: 168: 158: 157: 144: 140: 126:Article talk 125: 121: 102: 35: 27: 113:visual edit 492:Category 459:TwoScars 445:TwoScars 431:TwoScars 429:message. 416:TwoScars 402:TwoScars 377:TwoScars 339:TwoScars 325:TwoScars 300:TwoScars 286:TwoScars 260:TwoScars 246:TwoScars 217:TwoScars 195:TwoScars 171:TwoScars 169:Thanks, 136:history 117:history 103:Article 45:Toolbox 356:four. 145:Watch 16:< 480:talk 463:talk 449:talk 435:talk 420:talk 406:talk 381:talk 371:and 365:most 343:talk 329:talk 304:talk 290:talk 264:talk 250:talk 221:talk 199:talk 175:talk 132:edit 109:edit 494:: 482:) 465:) 451:) 437:) 422:) 408:) 383:) 345:) 331:) 306:) 292:) 266:) 252:) 223:) 201:) 177:) 149:• 134:| 115:| 111:| 478:( 461:( 447:( 433:( 418:( 404:( 379:( 341:( 327:( 302:( 288:( 262:( 248:( 219:( 197:( 173:( 141:· 138:) 130:( 122:· 119:) 107:( 87:e 80:t 73:v

Index

Knowledge:Peer review
Blackford County, Indiana
Previous peer review
Copying check
Manual of Style
v
t
e
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
Blackford County, Indiana
TwoScars
talk
15:59, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
TwoScars
talk
18:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Warren County, Indiana
Knowledge:WikiProject U.S. counties
TwoScars
talk
22:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Warren County, Indiana

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑