154:
198:
A tiny suggestion - I think "up to" is redundant in the first sentence, because the "can" makes it redundant. Otherwise looks good to me, but I'm not pretending to know what's involved in peer-reviewing for featured status. Good luck! —
126:
122:
107:
99:
76:
223:
115:
69:
208:
187:
171:
I've listed this article for peer review because I am interesting in seeing how it would fare in a
Featured List review.
92:
44:
204:
62:
50:
200:
17:
179:
217:
161:
175:
148:
141:
134:
103:
70:
8:
77:
63:
32:
35:
7:
24:
152:
193:Comments from Jonathanischoice
1:
209:07:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
28:List of largest cruise ships
188:19:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
164:discussion has been closed.
240:
224:January 2020 peer reviews
18:Knowledge:Peer review
169:
168:
142:Watch peer review
87:
86:
231:
184:
156:
155:
149:
139:
130:
111:
79:
72:
65:
47:
33:
239:
238:
234:
233:
232:
230:
229:
228:
214:
213:
195:
180:
153:
145:
120:
97:
91:
83:
51:Manual of Style
43:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
237:
235:
227:
226:
216:
215:
212:
211:
194:
191:
182:
167:
166:
157:
147:
146:
144:
90:
85:
84:
82:
81:
74:
67:
59:
56:
55:
54:
53:
48:
38:
37:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
236:
225:
222:
221:
219:
210:
206:
202:
197:
196:
192:
190:
189:
185:
177:
172:
165:
163:
158:
151:
150:
143:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
89:
88:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
61:
60:
58:
57:
52:
49:
46:
45:Copying check
42:
41:
40:
39:
34:
29:
26:
19:
173:
170:
159:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
27:
162:peer review
104:visual edit
218:Category
174:Thanks,
127:history
108:history
94:Article
36:Toolbox
176:Ahecht
160:This
136:Watch
16:<
205:talk
183:PAGE
181:TALK
123:edit
100:edit
201:Jon
220::
207:)
186:)
140:•
125:|
106:|
102:|
203:(
178:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
78:e
71:t
64:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.