Knowledge

:Peer review/Louisiana Tech University/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

200:. The lead should be an accessible and inviting overview of the whole article. Nothing important should be in the lead only - since it is a summary, it should all be repeated in the body of the article itself - however the space grant is only in the lead and infobox (did not check everything in the lead) 212:
The act established "The Industrial Institute and College of Louisiana", a first class industrial institute created to provide education in the arts and sciences. Control of the school was entrusted to a board of trustees, which elected Colonel Arthur T. Prescott of Baton Rouge as the first president
153:
I've listed this article for peer review because the article has been extensively revised and reworked over the past few weeks and months. The number of references has increased from 18 to about 90 since the revisions started, and each major heading has been heavily revised to include information on
157:
I need the article reviewed to identify and correct any deficiencies with the content, spelling, and grammar. The article is rated as Start-Class, and I am working with a few other people to turn the article on Louisiana Tech into a featured article. This is the first step of our process to review
259:
Currently Louisiana Tech sponsors men's intercollegiate baseball, basketball, cross country, football, golf, indoor track and outdoor track along with women's intercollegiate basketball, bowling, indoor track, outdoor track, volleyball, soccer, softball and
206:
Biggest problem I see with this article is a lack of references. For examp;le the last three paragraphs of the "Establishment of the Industrial Institute and College of Louisiana" section have no refs and all need at least
247:
Articles are also supposed to use independent third-party sources wherever possible - this article depends pretty heavily on LA Tech sources (some are OK, but try to use as little as possible)
203:
My rule of thumb is to include every header in the lead in some way, but I do not see anything about Traditions or University presidents or notable alumni in the lead (to name a few).
265:
Article has a lot of short (one or two sentence) paragraphs and sections that break up the narrative flow. These should be combined with others or perhaps expanded wherever possible.
290: 210:
ANy time there is a reference in a paragraph with one or more unreferenced sentences after, those sentences need at least one ref too - one exampole (from the same section)
297: 126: 122: 107: 76: 99: 296:
Please make sure that the existing text includes no copyright violations, plagiarism, or close paraphrasing. For more information on this please see
308:(which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, 361: 69: 183: 115: 217:
My rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs at least one ref.
305: 342: 323: 170: 220:
Many of the existing refs are incomplete. Internet refs need URL, title, author if known, publisher and date accessed.
190: 44: 300:. (This is a general warning given in all peer reviews, in view of previous problems that have risen over copyvios.) 285:
SInce the Lady of the Mist was created after 1923, it is probably still under copyright, so photos of it have to be
62: 92: 50: 275:
I would spread the images through the article and not just put them in galleries. See some model FAs for ideas.
338: 166: 304:
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at
250:
The current state of references would be enough to result in a quick fail for the article if it were at
178:: Thanks for your work to improve this interesting article, here are some suggestions for improvement. 17: 313: 182:
A model article is useful for ideas and examples to follow. There are many FAs on univeristies at
286: 334: 224: 162: 279: 309: 269: 244:- what makes campusgrotto.com a reliable source (why not link to Kiplinger's directly)? 231: 197: 355: 251: 241: 257:
Avoid vague time terms like "currently" as these can become out of date quickly
235: 272:- usually section headers on Knowledge are more concise (telegraphic) 293:
needs its license changed and has to have a fair use rationale.
141: 134: 103: 186:, which seem like they would be useful model articles. 161:
Thanks for your work and any comments on the article,
154:
numerous topics related to Louisiana Tech University.
291:
File:Revised Lady of the Mist at LA Tech IMG 3767.JPG
298:Knowledge:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches 158:and improve upon our work on this article so far. 230:and other cite templates may be helpful. See 70: 8: 150:This peer review discussion has been closed. 77: 63: 32: 262:Use things like "As of 2011..." instead 184:Category:FA-Class Universities articles 35: 189:The toolbox on this PR page finds one 7: 278:SOme of the images are problematic. 196:I am not sure that the lead follows 24: 268:Make sure section headers follow 254:(and FAC is even more stringent) 282:is almost certainly a copyvio. 1: 306:Knowledge:Peer review/backlog 333:Thank you for your help! :) 240:Make sure that refs follow 378: 343:20:33, 23 June 2011 (UTC) 324:04:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 171:21:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 28:Louisiana Tech University 193:which needs to be fixed. 362:July 2011 peer reviews 18:Knowledge:Peer review 176:Ruhrfisch comments 320: 142:Watch peer review 87: 86: 369: 318: 229: 223: 139: 130: 111: 79: 72: 65: 47: 33: 377: 376: 372: 371: 370: 368: 367: 366: 352: 351: 317: 280:File:Techxx.JPG 227: 221: 213:of the college. 145: 120: 97: 91: 83: 51:Manual of Style 43: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 375: 373: 365: 364: 354: 353: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 314: 302: 301: 294: 283: 276: 273: 266: 263: 255: 248: 245: 238: 218: 215: 208: 204: 201: 194: 187: 152: 147: 146: 144: 90: 85: 84: 82: 81: 74: 67: 59: 56: 55: 54: 53: 48: 38: 37: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 374: 363: 360: 359: 357: 344: 340: 336: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 322: 321: 311: 307: 299: 295: 292: 288: 284: 281: 277: 274: 271: 267: 264: 261: 256: 253: 249: 246: 243: 239: 237: 233: 226: 219: 216: 214: 209: 205: 202: 199: 195: 192: 188: 185: 181: 180: 179: 177: 173: 172: 168: 164: 159: 155: 151: 143: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 89: 88: 80: 75: 73: 68: 66: 61: 60: 58: 57: 52: 49: 46: 45:Copying check 42: 41: 40: 39: 34: 29: 26: 19: 335:AllisonFoley 312: 303: 258: 211: 175: 174: 163:Arkansas3544 160: 156: 149: 148: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 27: 287:WP:FAIR USE 104:visual edit 316:<: --> 310:Ruhrfisch 356:Category 225:cite web 191:dab link 270:WP:HEAD 260:tennis. 232:WP:CITE 198:WP:LEAD 127:history 108:history 94:Article 36:Toolbox 252:WP:GAN 315:: --> 289:. So 242:WP:RS 136:Watch 16:< 339:talk 236:WP:V 234:and 207:one. 167:talk 123:edit 100:edit 358:: 341:) 228:}} 222:{{ 169:) 140:• 125:| 106:| 102:| 337:( 319:° 165:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:( 78:e 71:t 64:v

Index

Knowledge:Peer review
Louisiana Tech University
Copying check
Manual of Style
v
t
e
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch peer review
Arkansas3544
talk
21:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Category:FA-Class Universities articles
dab link
WP:LEAD
cite web
WP:CITE
WP:V
WP:RS
WP:GAN
WP:HEAD
File:Techxx.JPG
WP:FAIR USE

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.