233:
The article is very interesting, educational and generally very good, although it will benefit from a more academic style of writing. First of all, it requires more references. Occasionally, one stumbles on inconclusive statements, for instance, the bombing in 1935 (see below). I see here several
291:
OK I may have jumped the gun a bit by putting this to PR before starting work. Upon close inspection what's there is definitely salvageable, but the issue is that there's a lot of holes, both in content and sourcing. So it's going to need extensive work either way (not that I didn't already know
292:
that). I plan to rework the article and then ask you guys' opinions once more. Until then, thanks for the comments! (I'll leave this open for a bit longer to get people's quips in; the quick response very much surprised me, but I suppose that's what you get when you've been here long enough).
255:
Your "Wilkes expedition" reads like a novel. It would be great and would make the entire article more interesting if you could similarly add some more facts and details to the earlier ascents. For "Today", one could, perhaps, add a map showing the existing trails for those who plan to
238:
The structure of the article. It looks to me that your first goal was to describe the volcano and the specifics of its activity. To maintain the focus on the subject, I suggest moving "Climate" and "Ascents" further to the end of the
259:
I suggest working on the sentence "It is sometimes reported that missionary Joseph
Goodrich ...". "Sometimes" is perhaps not the best word. "Several sources" is closer to the intended meaning. References to those reports would help,
269:
Section "Hazards", last sentence of the first paragraph: It is unclear why towns build on the recent lava deposits are in particular danger. Is it because lava of future eruptions is likely to follow the same
219:
Actually I see a few unreferenced paras here and there. Start with them. I suspect you'll find other info to add and some that might need rewording. Once fully sourced then we can start with the copyediting.
170:. I know it's received a review already, in January, but I'd like some experienced editors to jump on this and tell me about what I need to do to get a GA nom, or maybe preserve that star.
167:
263:
In "Historic eruptions", paragraph 4, air force is would be more descriptive than air power. Did the bombing described successful in diverting the path of lava?
89:
38:
266:
The first paragraph of "Current activity" requires a reference. Also, the term of inflation in the context of volcano activity needs to be defined.
319:
139:
135:
82:
21:
120:
245:
The last paragraph under "Structure" (beginning with
Tradewinds) seems to belong to "Climate" rather than to "Structure".
166:
I've listed this article for peer review because it's an aging FA from 2006 that needs work as the last piece of my
112:
75:
63:
299:
180:
17:
282:
57:
305:
294:
286:
242:
I recommend adding to the introduction the fact that since 1832 there were 32 eruptions documented.
186:
175:
278:
252:. I also suggest to find an appropriate place for this paragraph in the section "Ascents".
214:
section (needs referencing) - find a good source and you might find more exacting info.
128:
313:
105:
201:
section - first para unreferenced and some more info could be added. e.g.
248:
I agree with
Casliber on suggested additions to the first paragraph of
224:
Amalgamate one and two sentence segments into more cohesive paras.
203:
An
American visit in 1840 turned into a trip of almost a month.
154:
147:
116:
273:In "Monitoring", paragraph 2 requires a reference.
83:
8:
163:This peer review discussion has been closed.
205:- how long and why could be added/tweaked.
90:
76:
45:
48:
7:
28:
1:
306:00:17, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
287:07:19, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
187:23:17, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
234:point for the improvement:
336:
320:December 2012 peer reviews
229:Comments from Chemist234
192:Comments from Casliber
18:Knowledge:Peer review
210:Ditto first para of
40:Previous peer review
155:Watch peer review
100:
99:
327:
304:
302:
185:
183:
152:
143:
124:
92:
85:
78:
60:
46:
335:
334:
330:
329:
328:
326:
325:
324:
310:
309:
300:
293:
231:
194:
181:
174:
158:
133:
110:
104:
96:
64:Manual of Style
56:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
333:
331:
323:
322:
312:
311:
275:
274:
271:
267:
264:
261:
257:
253:
246:
243:
240:
230:
227:
226:
225:
221:
220:
216:
215:
207:
206:
193:
190:
165:
160:
159:
157:
103:
98:
97:
95:
94:
87:
80:
72:
69:
68:
67:
66:
61:
51:
50:
44:
43:
34:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
332:
321:
318:
317:
315:
308:
307:
303:
298:
297:
289:
288:
284:
280:
272:
268:
265:
262:
258:
254:
251:
247:
244:
241:
237:
236:
235:
228:
223:
222:
218:
217:
213:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
195:
191:
189:
188:
184:
179:
178:
171:
169:
164:
156:
151:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
131:
127:
122:
118:
114:
109:
108:
102:
101:
93:
88:
86:
81:
79:
74:
73:
71:
70:
65:
62:
59:
58:Copying check
55:
54:
53:
52:
47:
42:
41:
37:
36:
33:
30:
23:
19:
295:
290:
276:
250:Mokuʻāweoweo
249:
232:
211:
202:
199:Mokuʻāweoweo
198:
176:
172:
162:
161:
148:
144:
130:Article talk
129:
125:
106:
39:
31:
277:Good luck,
117:visual edit
279:Chemist234
32:Mauna Loa
22:Mauna Loa
314:Category
239:article.
173:Thanks,
168:GT (FT?)
20: |
212:Origins
140:history
121:history
107:Article
49:Toolbox
256:visit.
270:path?
149:Watch
16:<
283:talk
260:too.
197:The
136:edit
113:edit
301:Mar
296:Res
182:Mar
177:Res
316::
285:)
153:•
138:|
119:|
115:|
281:(
145:·
142:)
134:(
126:·
123:)
111:(
91:e
84:t
77:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.