93:
The main flaws of the article is its unbalance and very narrow geographical scope. As far as I know, SAT is taken all over the world, and is accepted by a large number of universities outside US. This fact should be taken into account in the article, and at least mentioned in the lead. Also should be
110:
The biases section is incredibly small and leaves something to be desired. Particularly for a test as important as the SAT, which has been so heavily criticized for its biases, this needs to be addressed in much more detail.
44:
I am renominating this article because it has been totally rewritten since its last pear review and has almost no resemblance to the earlier version. It appears to be well written and of good quality.
74:
59:
116:
112:
21:
99:
66:
95:
17:
94:
mentioned how SAT dates might differ in Muslim countries, how the results compare internationally...
50:
120:
103:
86:
54:
82:
27:
70:
46:
78:
38:
73:
style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click
69:
review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
8:
65:A script has been used to generate a semi-
7:
60:Knowledge:Peer review/SAT/archive1
35:
1:
121:03:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
104:14:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
87:12:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
55:14:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
137:
28:Knowledge:Peer review/SAT
113:Wikipediatoperfection
18:Knowledge:Peer review
26:(Redirected from
128:
31:
136:
135:
131:
130:
129:
127:
126:
125:
85:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
134:
132:
124:
123:
107:
106:
90:
89:
81:
41:
36:
34:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
133:
122:
118:
114:
109:
108:
105:
101:
97:
92:
91:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
62:
61:
57:
56:
52:
48:
40:
37:
29:
23:
19:
58:
43:
77:. Thanks,
67:automated
20: |
47:Zginder
71:house
16:<
117:talk
100:talk
75:here
51:talk
79:APR
39:SAT
22:SAT
119:)
102:)
96:CG
53:)
115:(
98:(
83:t
49:(
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.