35:
99:
166:
can be presumed until disagreement becomes evident. That is typically through reverting, editing, or stating disagreement on a relevant talk page. You find out whether your edit has consensus when it sticks, is built upon by others, and most importantly when it is used or referred to by others.
378:
and it is highly likely that you will eventually find yourself affected by the outcome of some decision that you didn't know about, or didn't have the chance to join. Where a decision is based mostly on silence, it is especially important to remember that
374:, a lack of response to an edit does not necessarily imply community consent. Knowledge is huge and our editors' time is limited. At any given time, there are many open discussions on many different topics across the project. We encourage our editors to
204:
Of course, it is impractical to wait forever for affirmation: in the meantime then, sometimes it is best to assume that silence implies consensus. Lacking any objections on talk pages, you can continue to hold that hopefully safe assumption until
264:
When two editors reach an impasse, one or both may think that repeating and reiterating the same arguments is the only alternative to consent by silence. This is not the case. Either editor may withdraw from the discussion by stating that:
397:
Apply the rule of silence and consensus only when a weak consensus would suffice. Silence and consensus does not apply when a mandatory discussion is required. When real people are affected by a decision, such as
392:
201:. No matter how many people on a talk page say they support an edit, sometimes it is only when your changes are reverted or substantially changed that you learn that you did not, in fact, have full consensus.
195:
In wiki-editing, it is difficult to get positive affirmation for your edits. Disapproval comes with a further edit, a statement of disapproval on the page's talk page or your talk page, or at times a
170:
Most of the time, you will find that it's fine to assume consensus, even if just for now, as it's more important to keep editing and cooperating smoothly in
406:, positive confirmation is preferred. Even in these cases, however, dissent might show up later, and it is then no longer appropriate to assume consensus.
551:
209:
by editing or reverting. The more visible the statement, and the longer it stands unchallenged, the stronger the implication of consensus is.
546:
467:
276:
340:
The post is correct, well-written information that needs no follow-up commentary. There's nothing more to say except "Yeah, what they said."
256:
56:
380:
462:
116:
43:
449:
305:
343:
The post is complete and utter nonsense, and no one wants to waste the energy or bandwidth to even point this out.
479:
55:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
420:
508:
367:
Consensus arising from silence evaporates when an editor changes existing content or objects to it.
432:
297:
246:". If therefore you wish to construe what my silence betokened, you must construe that I consented.
60:
47:
371:
317:
218:
70:
444:
375:
190:
531:
301:
197:
17:
399:
283:
If an editor withdraws without comment the other editor should, before assuming consent,
540:
403:
359:
287:
206:
171:
293:
the silent editor and alert them that their silence will be construed as agreement.
163:
349:
No one understood the post, but won't ask for clarification, for whatever reason.
251:
504:
484:
336:
The problem with no response is that there are five possible interpretations:
393:
Knowledge:Silence does not imply consent when drafting new policies
158:
consensus exists because you have seen evidence of disagreement.
107:
Consensus is assumed when there's no evidence of disagreement.
93:
29:
275:
The other editor is free to pursue the options offered at
325:
226:
78:
91:
Explanatory essay about the
Knowledge:Consensus page
352:No one cares about the post, for whatever reason.
334:
234:
112:
452:– relating to articles, media, and other pages
179:if you disagree, the onus is on you to say so
8:
237:
114:
346:No one read the post, for whatever reason.
433:Knowledge:Consensus § Level of consensus
312:Silence is the weakest form of consensus
207:someone comes along and changes the page
496:
143:Nobody ever complained about my idea →
450:Knowledge:Deletion process § No quorum
362:-- Original description of the dilemma
269:The discussion has reached an impasse,
468:Knowledge:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
7:
404:biographies of living persons policy
123:He who is silent is taken to agree.
402:, or using material covered by the
370:This so because, as illustrated by
152:Someone complained about my idea →
360:Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
145:You can assume there is consensus
61:thoroughly vetted by the community
57:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
308:without first seeking consensus.
552:Knowledge essays about consensus
213:What does not constitute silence
97:
33:
277:WP:Dispute resolution requests
272:They will not continue it, and
1:
421:Meta:Don't vote on everything
547:Knowledge supplemental pages
463:Knowledge:What is consensus?
242:": the maxim of the law is "
117:Qui tacet consentire videtur
18:Knowledge:Presumed consensus
568:
390:
315:
296:That said, in the face of
216:
188:
68:
480:Consensus decision-making
532:meatball:SilentAgreement
304:a good faith editor may
147:until you hear otherwise
105:This page in a nutshell:
509:Internet Movie Database
505:"A Man For All Seasons"
355:
262:
238:
131:
115:
27:Wikimedia project page
257:A Man for All Seasons
244:Silence gives consent
174:as much as possible.
387:Scope of application
381:consensus can change
177:A corollary is that
239:Qui tacet consentit
136:Is there consensus?
59:as it has not been
48:Knowledge:Consensus
439:Related guidelines
358:Bryan C. Warnock.
154:You can no longer
445:Knowledge:Be bold
415:Essays on silence
372:Warnock's dilemma
191:Silence procedure
111:
110:
89:
88:
44:explanatory essay
16:(Redirected from
559:
519:
518:
516:
515:
501:
427:Related policies
363:
328:
292:
286:
260:
241:
229:
129:
120:
101:
100:
94:
81:
37:
36:
30:
21:
567:
566:
562:
561:
560:
558:
557:
556:
537:
536:
528:
523:
522:
513:
511:
503:
502:
498:
493:
412:
395:
389:
365:
357:
332:
331:
324:
320:
314:
290:
284:
261:
250:
233:
232:
225:
221:
215:
193:
187:
161:
137:
130:
127:
98:
92:
85:
84:
77:
73:
65:
64:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
565:
563:
555:
554:
549:
539:
538:
535:
534:
527:
526:External links
524:
521:
520:
495:
494:
492:
489:
488:
487:
482:
471:
470:
465:
457:Related essays
454:
453:
447:
436:
435:
424:
423:
411:
408:
400:blocking users
388:
385:
354:
353:
350:
347:
344:
341:
333:
330:
329:
326:WP:WEAKSILENCE
321:
316:
313:
310:
306:employ silence
281:
280:
273:
270:
248:
236:The maxim is "
231:
230:
222:
217:
214:
211:
186:
183:
160:
159:
153:
150:
144:
140:
135:
132:
125:
109:
108:
102:
90:
87:
86:
83:
82:
74:
69:
66:
54:
53:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
564:
553:
550:
548:
545:
544:
542:
533:
530:
529:
525:
510:
506:
500:
497:
490:
486:
483:
481:
478:
477:
476:
475:
469:
466:
464:
461:
460:
459:
458:
451:
448:
446:
443:
442:
441:
440:
434:
431:
430:
429:
428:
422:
419:
418:
417:
416:
409:
407:
405:
401:
394:
386:
384:
382:
377:
373:
368:
364:
361:
351:
348:
345:
342:
339:
338:
337:
327:
323:
322:
319:
311:
309:
307:
303:
299:
294:
289:
278:
274:
271:
268:
267:
266:
259:
258:
253:
247:
245:
240:
228:
227:WP:NOTSILENCE
224:
223:
220:
212:
210:
208:
202:
200:
199:
192:
184:
182:
180:
175:
173:
168:
165:
157:
151:
148:
142:
141:
139:
138:
128:Latin proverb
124:
121:
119:
118:
106:
103:
96:
95:
80:
76:
75:
72:
67:
62:
58:
51:
49:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
512:. Retrieved
499:
473:
472:
456:
455:
438:
437:
426:
425:
414:
413:
396:
369:
366:
356:
335:
295:
282:
263:
255:
243:
235:
203:
196:
194:
178:
176:
169:
162:
155:
146:
134:
133:
122:
113:
104:
41:
252:Thomas More
42:This is an
541:Categories
514:2009-05-31
491:References
485:Groupthink
391:See also:
189:See also:
172:good faith
79:WP:SILENCE
46:about the
185:Rationale
164:Consensus
474:Articles
410:See also
318:Shortcut
219:Shortcut
71:Shortcut
376:be bold
298:vandals
302:trolls
198:revert
156:assume
300:and
288:ping
50:page
254:in
543::
507:.
383:.
291:}}
285:{{
249:—
181:.
126:—
52:.
517:.
279:.
149:.
63:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.