835:: Most RfA's with a final tally of 75% support or more will close as successful, while those under 65% will generally not pass. There have however been rare exceptions, with candidates passing under this threshold. The 65β75 'grey' zone is subject to the bureaucrat's discretion after taking into account the quality of the arguments made by the participants, the strength of comments in the "Neutral" section, and after discounting any expressed viewpoints they consider to be invalid. In extremely close calls, an extension to the 7-day !voting period may be accorded, or a discussion (
532:: Examine your past and try to iron out any old differences. This should be done at least three months before the RfA. If the candidate has clearly demonstrated reform, minor issues dating back six months or so might be ignored while more serious issues older than 12 months might be the reason(s) for opposition. If there are issues you think might be brought up during your RfA, try to discuss them in your opening answers, rather than doing so in reaction to oppose statements. Your nominators can provide help talking this over.
538:: While nominators may be unable to examine candidate's private lives and activities on other websites, other users may have leads to behaviour that may cast doubts on the candidate's overall suitability, and might oppose accordingly. Don't be misled into thinking that being a moderator on a small internet forum will be a free pass through RfA β while it may demonstrate a mature and calm behaviour, small forums do not have the same problems and challenges that Knowledge does, so it may not count for very much.
427:: Commenters look at user pages. An uncluttered page with intelligent content goes a long way to not only demonstrating maturity, but also that editors recognise that Knowledge is a serious project. An untidy user page may signify an untidy mind and careless work. A lot of highly self promotional content, userboxes, and/or excessive external links to one's own private and working life could be seen as the sign of a big ego and a possible power-seeker. Review the user pages of admins.
748:, unless there are obvious reasons why the RfA should fail, most RfA's typically begin with a number of "support" statements, but seven days is a long time and !voting patterns can change dramatically. The more experienced participants will often hold off their comments until later in the process. There could be either an influx of supports or opposes, thus making the outcome unpredictable. Many of the later participants just state "per
563:: Adminship candidates are required since January 2018 to declare whether they have ever edited or created articles for compensation or quid pro quo of any kind. Although not forbidden by policy, paid editing is at best barely tolerated by the community and adminstrators are forbidden from using their tools or other special rights for advantage, gain, or profit for themselves, or for anyone else.
761:
participants will not see them as so and will oppose based on the answer; in the worst-case scenario such questions may even cause pile-on oppose statements. Some questions are posed by new users unfamiliar with the RfA process, and may seem irrelevant.Nothing in RfA process policy suggests that answering every question is a requirement,
38:
319:: Candidates who have only been active in a limited number of areas, or who intend to be active in specific areas only can often incur significant opposition. As the tools can also be used in many areas in which the candidate is less familiar, a relatively broad scope of previous activity in policy and decision making is expected.
102:
765:; however, not answering can occasionally create pile-on oppose statements. Advice varies from either putting on a brave show of making an answer, or ignoring the question.If you are asked a question you feel is inappropriate, don't rush to answer it, and consider seeking private advice from your nominator(s). Bureaucrats and
758:. RfA is an open book exam, and Knowledge is a huge repository of policies, guidelines, and help pages. Careful phrasing of the answers is required to demonstrate that the candidate knows how to apply the policy in question. Misinterpretation of candidates' correct answers can incur a pile-on of "oppose" statements.
577:. A candidate is unlikely to pass RfA with no AfD participation or a history of making AfD statements that don't match the final results. You should also avoid making "pile-on" AfD statements to inflate your AfD statistics (i.e. not adding anything new to an already clear consensus besides perhaps "per nom" or "per
752:" without bringing fresh rationale to the discussion; this is often referred to as a "pile-on". If after giving it enough time, however, the voting is well below the pass mark and the opposers' comments are valid, it may be good to withdraw to avoid yourself pain and to be respectful of participants' time.
406:: There are no age restrictions for being an admin. Candidates are judged on their common sense, good judgement, and good prose. "Cool chat" and "teen talk" on talk pages may win fan club support, but may not go down so well with older editors. That said, Knowledge has several very young successful admins.
253:: Although administrators are responsible for blocking users, protecting and deleting pages, and closing some debates, some other actions can have an effect on the entire Knowledge website. Whichever areas candidates want to specialise in, they must convince the community that they can be trusted to use
616:
to wear, and will wait a very long time before they are proposed. Nevertheless, the user category the box added your name to is regularly reviewed by experienced editors and admins who are actively looking for suitable candidates to nominate. If they believe you to be a potential candidate, they will
723:
Choose a start date when you are fairly confident you will be able to participate regularly for an entire week. Your RfA is the only thing on
Knowledge that you can control the timing of, so telling others in the midst of it that you are too busy with real life to respond will likely not be received
499:
is not recommended. Removing warnings or contentious discussions leaves them in the page history where they can still be easily accessed by anyone. The many admins who participate at RfA can also view any user pages that you have asked to be deleted. Make sure people can see your past interaction by
416:
level of specialisation and contribution in some areas needing advanced knowledge such as bots, scripts, copyright, etc., it is unlikely that they will be elected based on a need for the tools for a single purpose. This doesn't mean that candidates can't focus their efforts on one or two areas (some
182:
The takeaway is: don't run for RFA unless you've really done your research on what it takes to pass, and even then assume you will do at least 10% worse than you would reasonably think you would. RFA is hard, and it can be very stressful for the candidate. Some users have failed at RFA and just left
205:
Knowledge is not 'just another website': it's a serious encyclopedia that just happens to be published online. If you would like to be an admin someday, you should preferably begin preparations some time before making your application. Avoid making it appear as if your end goal here is to become an
167:
More essays (especially those on users' criteria) and advice pages are listed at the end of this page. The footnotes contain links to important examples. Viewed separately, they are an integral part of this advice, so please be sure to review them. When you have read this guide and gone through the
141:
of edits showing their expertise in maintenance, policies, and content creation. The RfA process assesses not only editing skills but also a candidate's maturity, fairness, interactions with others, and overall judgment. Strong preparation, understanding of
Knowledge processes, and familiarity with
691:
Being nominated by another user demonstrates that at least another
Wikipedian has confidence that the candidate will be successful. Strong nominations come from experienced users who have done significant research to be sure that the nomination will not backfire on them. Many successful candidates
121:
The administrator role on
Knowledge is a special permission given only to editors who have shown they possess the necessary high level of knowledge, judgment, experience, and behaviour to be trusted by the community. It is not granted to new or inexperienced users, or even to average contributors.
712:
should always be answered before you transclude and start your RFA. If you are nominating yourself, your answers can be an opportunity to expand (rather than duplicate) some of the things you have said in your nomination statement. Do not make a joke in these statements; jokes do not go over well
225:
Do bear in mind that long absences from editing may not convince the community that you will be here to stay for a while. It would be extremely rare to pass RfA with less than 12 consecutive months of recent activity that include the kind of participation in maintenance areas that demonstrate an
779:
to make the process as fair as possible, but there are no guarantees. Some candidates with tens of thousands of edits fail as a result of concern expressed about isolated minor issues, or pile-on opposition following deliberate improper oppose statements or inappropriate statements made in good
682:
in their nomination statement. A self-nom must be strong, but not too long, and not sound self-promotional. Candidates who intend to self-nom are welcome to ask an experienced friend for advice on their draft. At
Knowledge all editors are considered equal; what a candidate has done outside of
648:
While the formal minimum qualification for requesting administrator permissions is extended confirmed status β that is, 500 edits and 30 days' experience β in practice few RfAs pass without at least 10,000 edits and a year's experience, and most experienced nominators will recommend that as a
375:
in that time. In contrast, being a
Wikipedian for too short a time is usually an issue. It is extremely rare to become an admin within less than twelve months of activity, and successful candidates generally have accounts that are at least two years old. Individuals who might have the right
760:
Many questions may not appear to be relevant to becoming a sysop, but the opposers will sometimes argue that the answers demonstrate a candidate's capacity to act under stress or to address silly comments from other users. Although such questions often cannot have a "correct" answer, many
343:: A low edit count will obviously be regarded by most as evidence of insufficient experience. Contributions are the only available basic metric of performance. As such, editors with low counts generally fail. No candidate with an edit count below 8,000 has passed in the last several years.
652:
Many RfA participants will oppose a candidate who doesn't have some content creation; it's not uncommon for experienced nominators to recommend a candidate have at least one featured article or two good articles which they either created from scratch or did significant work to
245:
for a final check if you have not already done so. Check out some of the previous polls in the archives for the kind comments and advice you can expect. Be aware though that you're expected to first read up on advice such as this page, before starting a poll.
392:: Candidates will need to show that they can make carefully considered contributions. The criteria are based on the ability to assess consensus in areas that will require admin decisions, input, and discussion closures; and especially to correctly implement
462:
should not be unusual or overly long (especially the code it generates) and should respect
Knowledge user name conventions. Some participants will oppose if they feel a name does not look serious enough for an editor of an encyclopedia, or if they find it
677:
If you feel confident you do pass these minimum recommended criteria, be aware that self-nominations get mixed reception. Some nominations are too short, some are too long, some are too witty, some are too bold, and some candidates simply inadvertently
110:
Becoming and admin is complex and requires a high level of experience and community trust. Please ensure you are prepared by reading up on old RfAs and advice pages, and then usually seeking advice from experienced editors. If you meet the criteria,
643:
Self-nominations are common at RfA, but successful ones less so. If you're considering nominating yourself rather than asking for or accepting a nomination from a highly-experienced editor, you'll need to do your own evaluation of your candidacy.
1098:
353:
always demonstrate experience. The criteria are based on what and where those edits were. Editors with a high number of edits can fail, and having a larger percentage of automated edits, or being too proud of your number of edits, can backfire.
965:
386:) may not count for much if there has been a long recent hiatus or if the edits are too spaced out. 30,000 edits with only 1,500 edits over the last five years isn't going to demonstrate that there will be much admin activity.
548:
for RfA is clear; RfA is not a popularity poll and it should not be done, on or off Wiki β even an innocent mention on IRC will entrain opposition, and users will not hesitate to post copies of the chat log. Consider using
263:: Users who have been previously blocked for any legitimate reason(s) will be required by the community to have learned from their block(s), and have been block-free for a considerable length of time (often 1 year).
786:. It is usually a bad idea for an RFA candidate to respond to anything in the RFA that is not an official question in the questions section. In particular, replying to oppose statements can generate accusations of
2202:
656:
Most RfA participants will be leery of a candidate who has been subject to editing or interaction restrictions within the past six months, and most experienced nominators will recommend waiting at least that
2472:
594:. The comments from the experienced users there are very useful for getting a good sense of your chances β but do not start a poll if you have no intention of applying for adminship in the near future.
506:
that express opinions on politics, religion, or other controversial issues have at times resulted in "Strong oppose" viewpoints based on fears of a potential risk of tendentious editing or systemic bias.
2003:
727:
Choose a start time when you are fairly confident you will have time to answer questions that come in the first couple of hours. After the first few hours, questions can be usually be left for up to 24
183:
forever. Others took it so bad they decided to become trolls and/or long-term abusers (thus proving their unfitness for the position). In 2001β2007 it was more or less a cakewalk. Not so much anymore.
283:. This can be done either by contributing referenced content to articles or by adding references to unreferenced content contributed by others. It is a huge plus but not essential to have contributed
1955:
1831:
242:
169:
2719:
2312:
493:
keyboards especially on mobile devices. People should be able to easily locate your user talk page to ask you questions. Fancy signatures are seen by many participants as a lack of maturity.
218:
may be considered by the community to be immature or not respectful of participant time. Some candidates whose first RfA failed, pass a second run with flying colours, but previous attempts
2325:
214:. Review old successful and unsuccessful RfAs, and be sure to generally meet the criteria required by regular participants (see the list of essays at the end of this page). Users who are
2634:
417:
candidates only state two or three admin areas they are likely to work in), but they will need to demonstrate they can at least be trusted with the whole tool set. (Note that an actual
2232:
2182:
668:
If you have fewer than 10,000 edits and a year's experience, if you have not improved any articles to GA or FA status, if you have any recent editing or interaction restrictions:
2966:
1868:
1484:
1262:
1276:
2187:
2177:
617:
contact you β probably by email, so be sure to have
Knowledge email enabled. As previously recommended, review the nominations of previous RfA that have passed and failed.
3196:
1021:
1462:
2465:
1998:
1669:
1657:
2892:
2144:
2069:
1347:
1074:
2305:
1988:
1983:
269:: Candidates should demonstrate cool-headed participation in discussions, and to have overcome earlier lapses in civility. They should never have engaged in making
802:. Candidates may believe that sounding intellectual will put them in good stead. It does not. While many Wikipedians are academics and intellectuals, most are not.
1812:
1581:
210:
an encyclopedia, not to administer it or control the behaviour of its participants. You should thoroughly read the instructions and advice listed here and on the
2197:
1846:
1136:
944:
939:
934:
606:
154:
1858:
605:
needs a strong, convincing nomination. Generally, self-nominations are only likely to succeed from long-term, very experienced editors. New users who have an
1950:
1336:
1309:
3191:
2925:
2212:
1940:
1473:
2649:
2298:
1935:
2222:
2192:
2172:
3125:
1841:
1819:
1038:
1025:
512:, especially sarcasm, cynicism, and even friendly banter, is often seen as bad form. Unless you are extremely popular and your chances of failure are
150:
50:
1922:
1755:
1592:
1559:
1548:
1298:
1113:
971:
2920:
2659:
2401:
2217:
2167:
1537:
158:
1733:
2227:
2940:
2726:
2595:
1715:
1570:
1802:
1430:
2137:
2015:
1287:
1228:
1080:
977:
894:
470:
1975:
1324:
3023:
1824:
1220:
1148:
1059:
995:
695:
812:: Cherry-picked diffs that do not reveal the full story in the thread they were taken from. Whether it seems deliberate or accidental,
520:
be wrongly interpreted by some. Most RfA commentators will instantly recognise humour, but those leaning oppose may not see the humour.
2913:
1050:
1013:
61:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
2945:
2322:
2046:
1121:
62:
2153:
871:
526:
may resurface and people may have an axe to grind. Even some people who never have commented at RfA before might comment on yours.
198:
2935:
2930:
1785:
1178:
1065:
590:
Just as a further reminder: If after reading the advice above you are still not sure, do consider obtaining some feedback at the
418:
126:
54:
3201:
2950:
2887:
2396:
2391:
2130:
2056:
2051:
2010:
1863:
1007:
581:"). In the past, RfA participants have interpreted some candidates with high AfD match rates this way and subsequently opposed.
570:
162:
2664:
2624:
2565:
2482:
2410:
2386:
1704:
1196:
1142:
441:
477:
computer or smartphone, but not on others). Pronounceable is best, and it should be typeable: non-Roman fonts, symbols, and
2560:
2041:
1190:
1166:
115:β well prepared candidates who fulfill the general criteria and have no skeletons in the cupboard can sail through an RfA.
3155:
3102:
2976:
2654:
2629:
2575:
2110:
1748:
3018:
2794:
2741:
2714:
2644:
2619:
2278:
2272:
1646:
1635:
983:
662:
If you do not satisfy the three preceding items, nominating yourself will be seen as exhibiting questionable judgement
573:(AfD) to gauge the candidate's understanding of the deletion policy. You can analyze your past AfD participation with
453:
257:
the tools responsibly and intelligently. They must also demonstrate that they act civilly and maturely at all times.
3140:
2590:
2585:
2555:
2460:
2416:
2344:
2036:
313:
might not be taken into consideration. A history of creating bad articles that were deleted will not go over well.
280:
3186:
2908:
2789:
2709:
2492:
2487:
2266:
2260:
2207:
1214:
956:
456:
will almost certainly be detected, and will seriously compromise your RfA, and perhaps your future on
Knowledge.
2971:
2877:
2832:
2784:
2779:
2497:
2455:
2421:
2254:
2248:
1777:
1624:
1001:
989:
130:
3097:
2865:
2450:
2381:
2099:
1741:
1202:
1184:
1172:
1160:
449:
357:
189:
2860:
2580:
2570:
2512:
2337:
1930:
1767:
861:
445:
2731:
1967:
1208:
1104:
1092:
735:. Having someone who opposed your previous request nominate you is an excellent way to demonstrate this.
326:
2358:
3164:
3030:
2669:
2545:
2477:
2445:
2406:
2031:
776:
334:
3035:
2736:
2639:
2550:
2540:
2079:
1241:
1154:
552:
66:
3047:
3042:
2686:
2535:
2074:
2064:
1881:
1108:
1054:
836:
791:
626:
393:
306:
76:
297:: Candidates' own creations should demonstrate a knowledge of article policies, guidelines, and
874:, learn to use the tools slowly, and watch out for some unexpected new links in strange places.
3107:
2882:
2872:
766:
545:
469:
are seen by some as ostentation. There are absolutely no rules against custom signatures, but
376:
temperament from day one must still demonstrate a broad knowledge of procedures and policies.
279:: Admin candidates are expected to have demonstrated understanding of how to assess and cite
2290:
787:
692:
are those who have been nominated by an admin or co-nominated by a second experienced user.
330:
215:
46:
3087:
1320:
1086:
397:
674:
by nominating yourself. Instead contact a highly-experienced editor and ask for advice.
960:
823:. It is possible that they will take these comments on face value without verification.
798:
679:
613:
591:
302:
1764:
Advice, requests for adminship (RfA), bureaucratship (RfB), and past request archives
3180:
2756:
1726:
813:
762:
578:
557:
on your userpage, which is a more neutral way to communicate your RfA to other users.
310:
301:
and the pages should be free of old tags. A high number of creations that are mainly
298:
211:
3064:
930:(2018): from a survey of what other admins have said about their RfA and adminship
794:, and also create a lot of text and draw a lot of attention to the oppose viewpoint.
371:) may not count for much. The criteria are based on what the candidate has actually
69:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
709:
288:
284:
270:
143:
3092:
1099:
User:Tisane/Self-nominations for adminship as prima facie evidence of power hunger
2122:
731:
If this is your second (or subsequent) RfA, you should wait at least 6β12 months
17:
2809:
660:
A self-nomination prompts the community to examine the candidate's judgement.
733:
while making sure you have addressed concerns brought up in the prior RfA(s)
1062:(2002βongoing) Β β a sitrep chart depicting RfA stats with a clear overview.
966:
WP:Admin functions that should be performed only by admins who are adults
906:
Keep editing, don't retire from Knowledge, and do try again another time.
478:
291:. Little or no content contribution can lead to significant opposition.
197:
490:
486:
172:
before making up your mind, or email an experienced user for advice.
482:
196:
421:
will have even lower chances of success; see "Diversity" above.)
237:
followed the links, if you are reasonably sure that you stand a
2294:
2126:
1737:
569:: Many RfA participants look at a candidate's participation at
329:
users have declared their intention by closed communication to
1089:(2011)Β β A critical look at the RfA process and what to expect
683:
Knowledge is of little importance for being an administrator.
481:
are discouraged and may not be easily available from standard
96:
32:
1193:(2019) β bullet list with minimum vs smooth RfA consideration
1139:(2014, 2016)Β β mainstream criteria in easy-to-read essay form
880:
Never hesitate to ask another admin for an opinion or advice.
671:
do not add "also has poor judgement" to the reasons to oppose
129:. The tasks that administrators can perform are described at
829:
by comments by Wikipedians who frequently oppose candidates.
773:
Many requests for adminship do not result in a fair process.
2995:
1181:(2011β2021)Β β detailed; major contributor to RfA and WT:RfA
945:
Episode 3/3 The last leg of the Admin Ship's current cruise
935:
Episode 1/3 Has the wind gone out of the AdminShip's sails?
125:
The process of becoming an administrator is explained at
383:
368:
1903:
1896:
1889:
1807:
1795:
1790:
1684:
1672:
1604:
1517:
1496:
1442:
1401:
1380:
1359:
860:
Enjoy the pints of beer, don't get too drunk, and wear
634:
574:
84:
1236:
Individual editors' criteria for nominating candidates
1131:
Individual editors' criteria for supporting candidates
1087:
User:Dayewalker#My RfA, and good faith advice on yours
444:
that you have added β even older ones β especially to
243:
WP:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll
168:
other advice, you may wish to start a request at the
1272:
1270:
664:, and can result in oppose statements on that alone.
133:. Successful candidates almost always have at least
3072:
3060:
3003:
2993:
2959:
2901:
2841:
2817:
2807:
2764:
2754:
2694:
2684:
2604:
2520:
2510:
2430:
2366:
2356:
2241:
2160:
2024:
1966:
1915:
1776:
1022:Category:Matters related to requests for adminship
1151:(2016β2017)Β β criteria, and advice for candidates
903:Learn from the feedback you got from the opposes.
500:providing easy access to your talk page archives.
367:: Simply being a Wikipedian for a long time (see
2473:Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources
1075:User:Ritchie333/Why admins should create content
1670:"Optional" questions should be banned entirely.
998:(2011βongoing) β a process page for nominations
885:If your RfA does not succeed or if you withdrew
180:
2635:Do not disrupt Knowledge to illustrate a point
222:be closely looked at again by the community.
2306:
2138:
1749:
1402:"Lankiveil, RfA Catfish Jim and the soapdish"
920:Years shown are those of primary development.
8:
3061:
821:comment based entirely on comments by others
2967:Categories, lists, and navigation templates
1053:(2008β2009)Β β major contributor to RfA and
3069:
3000:
2853:
2814:
2761:
2691:
2517:
2363:
2313:
2299:
2291:
2145:
2131:
2123:
1756:
1742:
1734:
516:low, any comment intended as lighthearted
206:admin β first and foremost we are here to
3197:Matters related to requests for adminship
1560:RfC about paid use of administrator tools
1039:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Debriefs
1026:Category:Knowledge essays about adminship
241:chance now, consider listing yourself at
1114:User:NoSeptember/Adminship is a big deal
1071:β Notes on RfA and adminship (2011β2021)
412:: Unless candidates have demonstrated a
2233:Viewing deleted pages and contributions
1255:
1107:(2008) Β β major contributor to RfA and
940:Episode 2/3 What do admins actually do?
839:) may take place among the bureaucrats.
137:of consistent editing experience, with
27:Essay on a Knowledge community process
784:Avoid responding to oppose statements
473:: Readability (it might look fine on
7:
1851:
1658:Are the optional questions optional?
1426:
1424:
1422:
1420:
1418:
1327:, with an edit count of about 8,000.
1229:Category:User criteria for adminship
1169:(2015)Β β focused on content creation
1081:User:Sven Manguard/Failed RfA Advice
877:Be a role model and lead by example.
335:WP:CLEANSTART#Requests for adminship
146:are essential for a successful RfA.
3126:List of all policies and guidelines
1673:(Townlake, WT:RfA 25 February 2011)
1443:"Andrew Davidson, RfA Peacemaker67"
1095:(2010) β originally by Juliancolton
1060:User:WereSpielChequers/RFA by month
769:may delete inappropriate questions.
155:Miniguide to requests for adminship
3165:Summaries of values and principles
3006:
2844:
2607:
2433:
1859:Advice for asking questions at RfA
1431:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Ξ£
1199:(2016β2017) β detailed bullet list
1187:(2009, 2014β2015)Β β clear, concise
1051:User:WereSpielChequers/RFA changes
325:: It is strongly recommended that
67:thoroughly vetted by the community
63:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
2203:Granting and revoking user rights
1122:Category:User essays on adminship
972:WP:Adminship is not for new users
3075:
2820:
2767:
2697:
2650:Please do not bite the newcomers
2523:
2369:
867:Learn from any feedback you got.
724:well (unless it's an emergency).
419:Knowledge:Single-purpose account
382:: An acceptable edit count (see
176:Preparing yourself for adminship
127:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
100:
51:Requests for adminship guideline
36:
3192:Knowledge Administrators' guide
1244:(2020) β What I have looked for
571:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
151:Guide to requests for adminship
113:don't let any of it put you off
1923:Requests for adminship by year
226:intention for admin activity.
1:
2660:Responding to threats of harm
2402:Biographies of living persons
2168:Advice for new administrators
1705:Knowledge:Don't take the bait
1381:"Ritchie333, RfA Checkingfax"
1217:(2019, 2021) - on temperament
978:WP:Advice for younger editors
229:When you have done all that,
2727:Criteria for speedy deletion
2596:Paid-contribution disclosure
996:WP:Request an RfA nomination
696:Requesting an RfA nomination
680:shoot themselves in the foot
159:Administrators' reading list
1832:Optional RfA candidate poll
1226:
1119:
1019:
1014:WP:Knowledge is not a forum
763:they can be ignored at will
756:Questions are unpredictable
693:
592:optional RfA candidate poll
355:
170:Optional RfA candidate poll
3218:
2228:Tools, scripts and gadgets
2105:Current bureaucrat count:
1879:
919:
624:
148:
144:WP:policies and guidelines
74:
30:Essay on editing Knowledge
3120:
2856:
2332:
2090:
1877:
1837:Advice for RfA candidates
1685:"Korruski: RfA My76Strat"
1660:(WT:RfA 27 February 2011)
1033:RFA candidates experience
1020:See also pages listed in
957:Knowledge:Mushroom effect
857:Enjoy the congratulations
410:Single-purpose candidates
349:: A high edit count does
2279:Revision deletion policy
1625:Knowledge:RfA cheatsheet
1605:"HJ Mitchel: RfA N419BH"
1518:"Shoessss, RfA: Kudpung"
1485:RfA: Boing! said Zebedee
1360:"Cunard, RfA RCsprinter"
1008:WP:What adminship is not
808:of candidates' comments
710:three standard questions
131:Knowledge:Administrators
108:This page in a nutshell:
3103:Licensing and copyright
2323:policies and guidelines
2047:Inactive administrators
1647:RfA questions 2020β2024
1277:RfA: theleekycauldron 2
916:RfA essays and criteria
799:Keep it short and sweet
3202:Requests for adminship
1786:Requests for adminship
1348:RfA: Cyberpower678 2nd
1325:successful RfA in 2023
1010:(2006β2008, 2014β2016)
900:Don't be disheartened.
614:seeking various "hats"
544:: Knowledge policy on
202:
185:
55:Requests for adminship
3098:Friendly space policy
2888:Broad-concept article
2397:What Knowledge is not
2392:Neutral point of view
2183:Dealing with disputes
2154:Administrators' guide
2094:Current admin count:
2057:Desysoppings by month
2052:Former administrators
2011:Bureaucrat discussion
1263:RfA WereSpielChequers
1105:User:Pedro/RfA review
1093:User:Mkdw/No big deal
872:Administrator's guide
608:I want to be an admin
467:Flamboyant signatures
200:
192:, formerly Beeblebrox
163:What adminship is not
65:, as it has not been
2665:Talk page guidelines
2625:Conflict of interest
2566:Ownership of content
2411:Copyright violations
2387:No original research
2249:Administrator policy
984:WP:Age and adminship
810:taken out of context
777:community is working
471:there are guidelines
442:copyright violations
440:: The most innocent
365:Length of membership
311:disambiguation pages
2561:No personal attacks
2483:Don't create hoaxes
2016:Bureaucrat activity
497:Talk page scrubbing
369:Xtools' year counts
3156:List of guidelines
2977:Template namespace
2655:Courtesy vanishing
2630:Disruptive editing
2576:Dispute resolution
1995:Unsuccessful RfBs
1947:Unsuccessful RfAs
1869:Arguments to avoid
1687:. En.wikipedia.org
1636:RfA questions 2011
1607:. En.wikipedia.org
1582:RfA: TheSandDoctor
1520:. En.wikipedia.org
1499:. En.wikipedia.org
1445:. En.wikipedia.org
1404:. En.wikipedia.org
1383:. En.wikipedia.org
1362:. En.wikipedia.org
1045:User essays on RfA
890:Relax β it's over.
854:Relax β it's over.
819:Many participants
734:
713:with participants.
216:not likely to pass
203:
190:Just Step Sideways
114:
3174:
3173:
3116:
3115:
3056:
3055:
3019:Project namespace
2989:
2988:
2985:
2984:
2926:Dates and numbers
2893:Understandability
2803:
2802:
2750:
2749:
2742:Revision deletion
2715:Proposed deletion
2680:
2679:
2645:Gaming the system
2620:Assume good faith
2506:
2505:
2288:
2287:
2273:Protection policy
2188:Dealing with spam
2178:Cleaning backlogs
2120:
2119:
1864:Advice for voters
1004:(2008, 2015β2017)
1002:WP:RfA cheatsheet
992:(2011β2013, 2016)
990:WP:Hat collecting
895:Failed RfA advice
814:assume good faith
732:
612:may been seen as
536:Off-wiki activity
454:featured articles
323:Fresh/clean start
289:featured articles
119:
118:
112:
95:
94:
18:Knowledge:RFASELF
16:(Redirected from
3209:
3187:Knowledge essays
3151:
3150:
3141:List of policies
3136:
3135:
3093:List of policies
3080:
3079:
3078:
3070:
3066:
3063:
3011:
3010:
3009:
3001:
2997:
2994:Project content
2854:
2849:
2848:
2847:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2815:
2811:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2762:
2758:
2702:
2701:
2700:
2692:
2688:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2591:Child protection
2586:No legal threats
2556:Ignore all rules
2528:
2527:
2526:
2518:
2514:
2461:Reliable sources
2438:
2437:
2436:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2364:
2360:
2345:Ignore all rules
2327:
2315:
2308:
2301:
2292:
2147:
2140:
2133:
2124:
2037:Adminship reform
1980:Successful RfBs
1927:Successful RfAs
1906:
1899:
1892:
1771:
1758:
1751:
1744:
1735:
1729:
1724:
1718:
1713:
1707:
1702:
1696:
1695:
1693:
1692:
1681:
1675:
1667:
1661:
1655:
1649:
1644:
1638:
1633:
1627:
1622:
1616:
1615:
1613:
1612:
1601:
1595:
1590:
1584:
1579:
1573:
1568:
1562:
1557:
1551:
1546:
1540:
1535:
1529:
1528:
1526:
1525:
1514:
1508:
1507:
1505:
1504:
1493:
1487:
1482:
1476:
1471:
1465:
1460:
1454:
1453:
1451:
1450:
1439:
1433:
1428:
1413:
1412:
1410:
1409:
1398:
1392:
1391:
1389:
1388:
1377:
1371:
1370:
1368:
1367:
1356:
1350:
1345:
1339:
1337:RfA: NickPenguin
1334:
1328:
1318:
1312:
1310:RfA: Pbsouthwood
1307:
1301:
1296:
1290:
1285:
1279:
1274:
1265:
1260:
1231:
1221:Worm That Turned
1145:(2015)Β β concise
1124:
1028:
699:
687:User nominations
637:
556:
361:
358:WP:Editcountitis
281:reliable sources
271:personal attacks
193:
104:
103:
97:
87:
40:
39:
33:
21:
3217:
3216:
3212:
3211:
3210:
3208:
3207:
3206:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3170:
3148:
3147:
3133:
3132:
3112:
3076:
3074:
3052:
3007:
3005:
2981:
2955:
2909:Manual of Style
2897:
2845:
2843:
2837:
2821:
2819:
2799:
2795:Page protection
2768:
2766:
2746:
2710:Deletion policy
2698:
2696:
2676:
2608:
2606:
2600:
2524:
2522:
2502:
2493:Patent nonsense
2488:Fringe theories
2434:
2432:
2426:
2370:
2368:
2352:
2328:
2319:
2289:
2284:
2267:Deletion policy
2261:Blocking policy
2237:
2208:History merging
2156:
2151:
2121:
2116:
2086:
2065:User rights log
2020:
1962:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1902:
1895:
1888:
1884:
1875:
1852:Self-nomination
1820:RfA nominations
1772:
1765:
1762:
1732:
1725:
1721:
1714:
1710:
1703:
1699:
1690:
1688:
1683:
1682:
1678:
1668:
1664:
1656:
1652:
1645:
1641:
1634:
1630:
1623:
1619:
1610:
1608:
1603:
1602:
1598:
1591:
1587:
1580:
1576:
1571:User:Salvidrim!
1569:
1565:
1558:
1554:
1547:
1543:
1536:
1532:
1523:
1521:
1516:
1515:
1511:
1502:
1500:
1495:
1494:
1490:
1483:
1479:
1472:
1468:
1461:
1457:
1448:
1446:
1441:
1440:
1436:
1429:
1416:
1407:
1405:
1400:
1399:
1395:
1386:
1384:
1379:
1378:
1374:
1365:
1363:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1346:
1342:
1335:
1331:
1321:User:0xDeadbeef
1319:
1315:
1308:
1304:
1297:
1293:
1286:
1282:
1275:
1268:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1248:
1247:
1127:
921:
918:
913:
911:Further reading
887:
851:
846:
751:
742:
740:During your RfA
720:
705:
689:
641:
640:
633:
629:
623:
621:Self-nomination
600:
588:
550:
434:
432:Specific points
347:High edit count
233:read this page
195:
187:
178:
165:
101:
91:
90:
83:
79:
71:
70:
37:
31:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3215:
3213:
3205:
3204:
3199:
3194:
3189:
3179:
3178:
3172:
3171:
3169:
3168:
3161:
3160:
3159:
3144:
3121:
3118:
3117:
3114:
3113:
3111:
3110:
3108:Privacy policy
3105:
3100:
3095:
3090:
3084:
3082:
3067:
3058:
3057:
3054:
3053:
3051:
3050:
3045:
3040:
3039:
3038:
3028:
3027:
3026:
3015:
3013:
2998:
2991:
2990:
2987:
2986:
2983:
2982:
2980:
2979:
2974:
2972:Categorization
2969:
2963:
2961:
2960:Classification
2957:
2956:
2954:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2905:
2903:
2899:
2898:
2896:
2895:
2890:
2885:
2880:
2878:Disambiguation
2875:
2870:
2869:
2868:
2857:
2851:
2839:
2838:
2836:
2835:
2833:Editing policy
2829:
2827:
2812:
2805:
2804:
2801:
2800:
2798:
2797:
2792:
2787:
2782:
2780:Administrators
2776:
2774:
2759:
2752:
2751:
2748:
2747:
2745:
2744:
2739:
2734:
2729:
2724:
2723:
2722:
2712:
2706:
2704:
2689:
2682:
2681:
2678:
2677:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2662:
2657:
2652:
2647:
2642:
2637:
2632:
2627:
2622:
2616:
2614:
2602:
2601:
2599:
2598:
2593:
2588:
2583:
2578:
2573:
2568:
2563:
2558:
2553:
2548:
2543:
2538:
2532:
2530:
2515:
2508:
2507:
2504:
2503:
2501:
2500:
2498:External links
2495:
2490:
2485:
2480:
2475:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2458:
2456:Citing sources
2453:
2448:
2442:
2440:
2428:
2427:
2425:
2424:
2422:Article titles
2419:
2414:
2404:
2399:
2394:
2389:
2384:
2378:
2376:
2361:
2354:
2353:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2333:
2330:
2329:
2321:Knowledge key
2320:
2318:
2317:
2310:
2303:
2295:
2286:
2285:
2283:
2282:
2276:
2270:
2264:
2258:
2255:Banning policy
2252:
2245:
2243:
2239:
2238:
2236:
2235:
2230:
2225:
2220:
2215:
2210:
2205:
2200:
2195:
2190:
2185:
2180:
2175:
2170:
2164:
2162:
2158:
2157:
2152:
2150:
2149:
2142:
2135:
2127:
2118:
2117:
2115:
2114:
2103:
2091:
2088:
2087:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2077:
2072:
2067:
2059:
2054:
2049:
2044:
2039:
2034:
2028:
2026:
2022:
2021:
2019:
2018:
2013:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2001:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1986:
1978:
1972:
1970:
1964:
1963:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1953:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1938:
1933:
1925:
1919:
1917:
1913:
1912:
1908:
1907:
1900:
1893:
1885:
1880:
1878:
1876:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1861:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1849:
1844:
1834:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1810:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1793:
1782:
1780:
1778:Administrators
1774:
1773:
1763:
1761:
1760:
1753:
1746:
1738:
1731:
1730:
1719:
1708:
1697:
1676:
1662:
1650:
1639:
1628:
1617:
1596:
1585:
1574:
1563:
1552:
1541:
1530:
1509:
1497:"RfA: Kudpung"
1488:
1477:
1466:
1455:
1434:
1414:
1393:
1372:
1351:
1340:
1329:
1313:
1302:
1291:
1280:
1266:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1246:
1245:
1233:
1232:
1224:
1218:
1212:
1206:
1200:
1194:
1188:
1182:
1176:
1173:John M Wolfson
1170:
1164:
1158:
1152:
1149:Chris troutman
1146:
1140:
1128:
1126:
1125:
1117:
1111:
1102:
1096:
1090:
1084:
1078:
1072:
1066:User:Kudpung,
1063:
1057:
1042:
1041:
1030:
1029:
1017:
1011:
1005:
999:
993:
987:
981:
975:
969:
963:
948:
947:
942:
937:
923:
922:
917:
914:
912:
909:
908:
907:
904:
901:
898:
891:
886:
883:
882:
881:
878:
875:
870:Check out the
868:
865:
858:
855:
850:
847:
845:
844:After your RfA
842:
841:
840:
830:
827:Don't be fazed
824:
817:
803:
795:
781:
770:
759:
753:
749:
741:
738:
737:
736:
729:
725:
719:
716:
715:
714:
704:
701:
688:
685:
666:
665:
658:
654:
650:
639:
638:
630:
625:
622:
619:
599:
596:
587:
586:Are you ready?
584:
583:
582:
564:
558:
539:
533:
527:
521:
519:
515:
507:
501:
494:
464:
457:
433:
430:
429:
428:
422:
415:
407:
401:
387:
380:Activity level
377:
374:
362:
352:
344:
341:Low edit count
338:
320:
314:
292:
274:
264:
258:
240:
236:
232:
221:
179:
177:
174:
140:
136:
117:
116:
105:
93:
92:
89:
88:
80:
75:
72:
60:
59:
43:
41:
29:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3214:
3203:
3200:
3198:
3195:
3193:
3190:
3188:
3185:
3184:
3182:
3167:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3157:
3152:
3145:
3143:
3142:
3137:
3130:
3129:
3128:
3127:
3123:
3122:
3119:
3109:
3106:
3104:
3101:
3099:
3096:
3094:
3091:
3089:
3086:
3085:
3083:
3081:
3071:
3068:
3059:
3049:
3046:
3044:
3041:
3037:
3034:
3033:
3032:
3029:
3025:
3022:
3021:
3020:
3017:
3016:
3014:
3012:
3002:
2999:
2992:
2978:
2975:
2973:
2970:
2968:
2965:
2964:
2962:
2958:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2921:Accessibility
2919:
2915:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2907:
2906:
2904:
2900:
2894:
2891:
2889:
2886:
2884:
2881:
2879:
2876:
2874:
2871:
2867:
2866:Summary style
2864:
2863:
2862:
2859:
2858:
2855:
2852:
2850:
2840:
2834:
2831:
2830:
2828:
2826:
2816:
2813:
2806:
2796:
2793:
2791:
2788:
2786:
2783:
2781:
2778:
2777:
2775:
2773:
2763:
2760:
2753:
2743:
2740:
2738:
2735:
2733:
2730:
2728:
2725:
2721:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2713:
2711:
2708:
2707:
2705:
2703:
2693:
2690:
2683:
2671:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2663:
2661:
2658:
2656:
2653:
2651:
2648:
2646:
2643:
2641:
2638:
2636:
2633:
2631:
2628:
2626:
2623:
2621:
2618:
2617:
2615:
2613:
2603:
2597:
2594:
2592:
2589:
2587:
2584:
2582:
2579:
2577:
2574:
2572:
2569:
2567:
2564:
2562:
2559:
2557:
2554:
2552:
2549:
2547:
2544:
2542:
2539:
2537:
2534:
2533:
2531:
2529:
2519:
2516:
2509:
2499:
2496:
2494:
2491:
2489:
2486:
2484:
2481:
2479:
2476:
2474:
2471:
2467:
2464:
2463:
2462:
2459:
2457:
2454:
2452:
2451:Autobiography
2449:
2447:
2444:
2443:
2441:
2439:
2429:
2423:
2420:
2418:
2415:
2412:
2408:
2405:
2403:
2400:
2398:
2395:
2393:
2390:
2388:
2385:
2383:
2382:Verifiability
2380:
2379:
2377:
2375:
2365:
2362:
2355:
2347:
2346:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2339:
2335:
2334:
2331:
2324:
2316:
2311:
2309:
2304:
2302:
2297:
2296:
2293:
2280:
2277:
2274:
2271:
2268:
2265:
2262:
2259:
2256:
2253:
2250:
2247:
2246:
2244:
2240:
2234:
2231:
2229:
2226:
2224:
2221:
2219:
2216:
2214:
2211:
2209:
2206:
2204:
2201:
2199:
2196:
2194:
2191:
2189:
2186:
2184:
2181:
2179:
2176:
2174:
2171:
2169:
2166:
2165:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2148:
2143:
2141:
2136:
2134:
2129:
2128:
2125:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2092:
2089:
2081:
2078:
2076:
2073:
2071:
2068:
2066:
2063:
2062:
2060:
2058:
2055:
2053:
2050:
2048:
2045:
2043:
2040:
2038:
2035:
2033:
2030:
2029:
2027:
2023:
2017:
2014:
2012:
2009:
2005:
2004:Chronological
2002:
2000:
1997:
1996:
1994:
1990:
1989:Chronological
1987:
1985:
1982:
1981:
1979:
1977:
1974:
1973:
1971:
1969:
1965:
1957:
1956:Chronological
1954:
1952:
1949:
1948:
1946:
1942:
1941:Chronological
1939:
1937:
1934:
1932:
1929:
1928:
1926:
1924:
1921:
1920:
1918:
1914:
1905:
1901:
1898:
1894:
1891:
1887:
1886:
1883:
1870:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1853:
1850:
1848:
1845:
1843:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1835:
1833:
1830:
1826:
1825:Request a nom
1823:
1822:
1821:
1818:
1814:
1811:
1809:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1801:
1797:
1794:
1792:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1784:
1783:
1781:
1779:
1775:
1769:
1759:
1754:
1752:
1747:
1745:
1740:
1739:
1736:
1728:
1727:Knowledge:RfA
1723:
1720:
1717:
1712:
1709:
1706:
1701:
1698:
1686:
1680:
1677:
1674:
1671:
1666:
1663:
1659:
1654:
1651:
1648:
1643:
1640:
1637:
1632:
1629:
1626:
1621:
1618:
1606:
1600:
1597:
1594:
1589:
1586:
1583:
1578:
1575:
1572:
1567:
1564:
1561:
1556:
1553:
1550:
1545:
1542:
1539:
1534:
1531:
1519:
1513:
1510:
1498:
1492:
1489:
1486:
1481:
1478:
1475:
1470:
1467:
1464:
1463:RfA: Ctjf83 2
1459:
1456:
1444:
1438:
1435:
1432:
1427:
1425:
1423:
1421:
1419:
1415:
1403:
1397:
1394:
1382:
1376:
1373:
1361:
1355:
1352:
1349:
1344:
1341:
1338:
1333:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1317:
1314:
1311:
1306:
1303:
1300:
1295:
1292:
1289:
1284:
1281:
1278:
1273:
1271:
1267:
1264:
1259:
1256:
1250:
1243:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1230:
1225:
1222:
1219:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1207:
1204:
1201:
1198:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1186:
1183:
1180:
1177:
1174:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1144:
1141:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1123:
1118:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1069:
1064:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1027:
1023:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1009:
1006:
1003:
1000:
997:
994:
991:
988:
985:
982:
979:
976:
973:
970:
967:
964:
962:
958:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:Project pages
946:
943:
941:
938:
936:
933:
932:
931:
929:
928:
915:
910:
905:
902:
899:
896:
892:
889:
888:
884:
879:
876:
873:
869:
866:
863:
859:
856:
853:
852:
849:If you passed
848:
843:
838:
834:
831:
828:
825:
822:
818:
815:
811:
807:
804:
801:
800:
796:
793:
789:
785:
782:
778:
774:
771:
768:
764:
757:
754:
747:
744:
743:
739:
730:
726:
722:
721:
717:
711:
707:
706:
702:
700:
697:
686:
684:
681:
675:
673:
672:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
646:
645:
636:
632:
631:
628:
620:
618:
615:
611:
609:
604:
597:
595:
593:
585:
580:
576:
572:
568:
565:
562:
559:
554:
547:
543:
540:
537:
534:
531:
528:
525:
524:Old conflicts
522:
517:
513:
511:
508:
505:
502:
498:
495:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
465:
461:
460:Your username
458:
455:
451:
450:good articles
447:
443:
439:
436:
435:
431:
426:
423:
420:
413:
411:
408:
405:
402:
399:
395:
391:
388:
385:
381:
378:
372:
370:
366:
363:
359:
350:
348:
345:
342:
339:
336:
333:. Please see
332:
328:
324:
321:
318:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
290:
286:
285:good articles
282:
278:
275:
272:
268:
265:
262:
259:
256:
252:
249:
248:
247:
244:
238:
234:
230:
227:
223:
219:
217:
213:
209:
199:
194:
191:
184:
175:
173:
171:
164:
160:
156:
152:
147:
145:
138:
134:
132:
128:
123:
109:
106:
99:
98:
86:
82:
81:
78:
73:
68:
64:
58:
57:process page.
56:
52:
48:
42:
35:
34:
19:
3163:
3154:
3146:
3139:
3131:
3124:
3088:Terms of Use
3073:
3024:WikiProjects
3004:
2941:Lead section
2861:Article size
2842:
2818:
2765:
2755:Enforcement
2695:
2605:
2581:Sockpuppetry
2571:Edit warring
2521:
2431:
2367:
2343:
2338:Five pillars
2336:
2275:(WP:PROTECT)
2218:Reading list
2198:Edit filters
2106:
2095:
2080:Meta old log
2025:Useful pages
1999:Alphabetical
1984:Alphabetical
1951:Alphabetical
1936:Alphabetical
1916:RfA analysis
1836:
1722:
1711:
1700:
1689:. Retrieved
1679:
1665:
1653:
1642:
1631:
1620:
1609:. Retrieved
1599:
1593:RfA: Kudpung
1588:
1577:
1566:
1555:
1549:RfA: Doniago
1544:
1533:
1522:. Retrieved
1512:
1501:. Retrieved
1491:
1480:
1469:
1458:
1447:. Retrieved
1437:
1406:. Retrieved
1396:
1385:. Retrieved
1375:
1364:. Retrieved
1354:
1343:
1332:
1316:
1305:
1299:RfA: Doniago
1294:
1283:
1258:
1235:
1234:
1211:(2021, 2023)
1209:TheresNoTime
1205:(2011, 2015)
1130:
1129:
1067:
1044:
1043:
1032:
1031:
950:
949:
927:The Signpost
926:
925:
924:
832:
826:
820:
809:
805:
797:
783:
772:
755:
746:At the start
745:
690:
676:
670:
669:
667:
661:
642:
607:
602:
601:
589:
566:
561:Paid editing
560:
541:
535:
530:Older issues
529:
523:
509:
503:
496:
474:
466:
459:
446:Did You Know
437:
424:
409:
403:
389:
379:
364:
346:
340:
322:
316:
294:
276:
266:
260:
254:
250:
228:
224:
207:
204:
186:
181:
166:
124:
120:
107:
85:WP:RFAADVICE
44:
2732:Attack page
2720:Biographies
2281:(WP:REVDEL)
1976:Noticeboard
1968:Bureaucrats
1538:RfA: Cobi 2
1197:SMcCandlish
1191:Nosebagbear
1137:Ad Orientem
1083:(2010β2013)
1077:(2015β2017)
980:(2010β2017)
974:(2008β2015)
968:(2010β2013)
864:with pride.
862:the T-shirt
792:bludgeoning
598:Nominations
384:month count
327:fresh start
201:No big deal
45:This is an
3181:Categories
3036:User boxes
3031:User pages
2670:Signatures
2546:Harassment
2478:Plagiarism
2446:Notability
2263:(WP:BLOCK)
2251:(WP:ADMIN)
2213:Protecting
2042:RfX Report
2032:RFA reform
1716:RfA: RexxS
1691:2013-08-17
1611:2013-08-17
1524:2013-08-17
1503:2013-08-17
1474:RfA: SoWhy
1449:2016-11-08
1408:2016-03-07
1387:2016-11-08
1366:2013-08-17
1242:Ritchie333
1227:See also:
1143:Biblioworm
1120:See also:
837:'crat chat
635:WP:RFASELF
553:RFA-notice
546:canvassing
542:Canvassing
463:confusing.
149:See also:
53:, and the
3043:Shortcuts
2737:Oversight
2685:Deletion
2640:Etiquette
2551:Vandalism
2541:Consensus
2417:Image use
2407:Copyright
1882:Shortcuts
1847:Miniguide
1167:GregJackP
1155:Covermoss
961:Barkeep49
959:, (2018)
788:badgering
703:Questions
603:Every RfA
575:this tool
504:Userboxes
438:Copyright
425:User page
414:very high
400:policies.
390:Judgement
317:Diversity
307:redirects
295:Creations
212:RfA pages
139:thousands
3048:Subpages
2914:Contents
2883:Hatnotes
2808:Editing
2790:Blocking
2536:Civility
2511:Conduct
2466:Medicine
2357:Content
2269:(WP:DEL)
2257:(WP:BAN)
2242:Policies
2223:Rollback
2193:Deleting
2173:Blocking
2161:Articles
2111:list all
2100:list all
2075:Meta log
1931:By month
1813:Archives
1808:new post
1803:RfA talk
1288:RfA: Liz
1215:Valereee
767:monitors
653:improve.
649:minimum.
627:Shortcut
479:dingbats
404:Maturity
398:blocking
394:deletion
267:Civility
135:one year
77:Shortcut
2946:Linking
2873:Be bold
2785:Banning
2070:Old log
1890:WP:RFAS
1179:Kudpung
833:Closure
610:userbox
277:Content
49:on the
2936:Layout
2931:Images
1904:WP:SAC
1897:WP:RCA
1768:search
1323:had a
1223:(2012)
1175:(2019)
1163:(2024)
1157:(2020)
1116:(2006)
1109:WT:RfA
1101:(2010)
1055:WT:RfA
1016:(2011)
986:(2008)
780:faith.
750:user X
728:hours.
718:Timing
579:WP:GNG
510:Humour
491:AZERTY
487:QWERTY
452:, and
331:Arbcom
261:Blocks
251:Basics
161:, and
2951:Lists
2902:Style
2061:Logs
1842:Guide
1796:watch
1251:Notes
1203:Swarm
1161:Femke
1068:Words
893:Read
806:Diffs
694:See:
657:long.
483:ASCII
356:(See
309:, or
303:stubs
299:style
208:build
47:essay
1791:edit
1185:Mkdw
1024:and
790:and
775:The
708:The
518:will
514:very
475:your
396:and
373:done
239:good
220:will
142:its
3065:(?)
3062:WMF
2996:(?)
2810:(?)
2757:(?)
2687:(?)
2513:(?)
2359:(?)
2326:(?)
2096:847
567:AfD
489:or
485:or
351:not
287:or
255:all
235:and
231:and
3183::
3153::
3138::
2107:15
1417:^
1269:^
555:}}
551:{{
448:,
360:.)
305:,
157:,
153:,
3149:G
3134:P
3077:P
3008:G
2846:G
2822:P
2769:P
2699:P
2609:G
2525:P
2435:G
2413:)
2409:(
2371:P
2314:e
2307:t
2300:v
2146:e
2139:t
2132:v
2113:)
2109:(
2102:)
2098:(
1770:)
1766:(
1757:e
1750:t
1743:v
1694:.
1614:.
1527:.
1506:.
1452:.
1411:.
1390:.
1369:.
897:.
816:.
698:.
337:.
273:.
188:β
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
