196:
While the phrase "status screen" is not used in the current target article, it was used in the article at the time the redirect was created. The redirect has existed since 2006 without any evidence of controversy, harm or confusion. While it's not a redirect that I would personally create, per
193:
I'm not sure what you mean that the "original page was deleted". Neither the history of the redirect page nor the history of any of the targets pages (the target has been updated several times) show any deleted history except briefly for a history-merger. It is also patently not a "typo". This
499:
pi, but they won't do any harm. The fact that they were created by two different people means that at least two people thought they were useful. Redirects aren't just for typos, and it is possible these were from copy-and-paste searches. ▫
544:- no good reason in deleting and in case of copy and paste searches. Besides, there is only 35 digits after the decimal point so it is not extraordinarily long. If there was 1 million digits then it will really be crazily large.
382:
I agree with
Rossami. This redirect does no-one any harm, and people who have never heard of pi and seen this number, might copy-paste it into Knowledge to see what it means. There is no real reason to remove this article.
363:
the digits in either but users might cut-and-paste them or find them somehow useful for external linking. They have existed without controversy for one and two years respectively. They are not harmful or confusing. So,
291:
315:
351:
We have had lots of discussions about similar numbers. The consensus has always been that while we wish editors would do something more useful than to create these, once they
39:
34:
397:
Out of curiosity, then, why don't we have the numbers between these two, such as 3.141592653589793238462643383279503 or 3.1415926535897932384626433832795029?
478:, doing no harm, causing no confusion, getting in the way of nothing, the target is correct and obvious. In short there is no reason to delete.
21:
118:
17:
299:
332:
This is just a little crazy on the number of digits. I do not think that anybody will type that many digits just to go to "
282:
433:
356:
323:
306:
207:
Having said that, the general concept of a "status screen" is not unique to RPGs. I could see a good argument for
553:
534:
517:
487:
470:
461:—Nobody would type this, and there are an unlimited number of such redirects just for pi, let alone e, √2, etc. —
453:
420:
406:
392:
377:
345:
275:
224:
188:
151:
100:
446:
253:
73:
402:
341:
252:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a
184:
166:
72:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a
113:
466:
359:
to deleting them. Bear in mind that redirects do more than merely support the search engine. I wouldn't
388:
126:
530:
437:
550:
483:
416:
398:
337:
180:
162:
53:
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 8, 2011
502:
212:
172:
136:
87:
462:
373:
271:
220:
95:
384:
526:
198:
545:
479:
412:
560:
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
231:
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
369:
267:
216:
91:
246:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.
66:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.
194:
redirect was deliberately created at this title in apparent good-faith.
205:
unless someone can present an actual showing of harm or confusion.
436:
and I don't see any real harm in keeping these redirects around. --
495:- they are accurate, correct? I could see deleting if they were
333:
310:
286:
319:
295:
122:
108:
256:). No further edits should be made to this section.
76:). No further edits should be made to this section.
368:unless there is a real reason to delete them.
8:
134:Original page was deleted, unlikely typo. ▫
201:there is also no reason to delete it.
283:3.14159265358979323846264338327950288
238:3.14159265358979323846264338327950288
7:
262:The result of the discussion was
211:to a more general article such as
28:
18:Knowledge:Redirects for discussion
411:Because nobody has created them.
82:The result of the discussion was
525:in case of copy=paste searches.
307:3.14159265358979323846264338327
1:
175:would make a good target, so
169:) 21:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
576:
554:06:53, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
535:07:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
518:21:02, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
488:09:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
471:06:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
421:09:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
276:16:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
189:13:08, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
101:15:54, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
454:22:50, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
407:17:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
393:17:28, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
378:18:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
346:17:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
225:22:53, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
152:20:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
249:Please do not modify it.
69:Please do not modify it.
114:Role-playing video game
355:been created there is
551:(My talk page here)
434:Redirects are cheap
213:HUD (video gaming)
173:HUD (video gaming)
88:HUD (video gaming)
376:
316:links to redirect
292:links to redirect
223:
119:links to redirect
567:
548:
514:
511:
508:
505:
452:
449:
442:
372:
326:
302:
251:
239:
219:
148:
145:
142:
139:
129:
111:
98:
71:
59:
44:
33:
575:
574:
570:
569:
568:
566:
565:
564:
563:
546:
512:
509:
506:
503:
447:
444:
440:SoCalSuperEagle
438:
313:
289:
254:deletion review
247:
241:
237:
234:
146:
143:
140:
137:
116:
107:
96:
74:deletion review
67:
61:
57:
51:
46:
45:
42:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
573:
571:
557:
556:
538:
537:
520:
490:
473:
456:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
399:Reaper Eternal
380:
338:Reaper Eternal
331:
329:
328:
304:
279:
278:
259:
258:
242:
240:
235:
228:
227:
206:
195:
191:
181:Reaper Eternal
163:Reaper Eternal
132:
131:
104:
103:
79:
78:
62:
60:
55:
50:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
572:
562:
561:
555:
552:
549:
543:
540:
539:
536:
532:
528:
524:
521:
519:
516:
515:
498:
494:
491:
489:
485:
481:
477:
474:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
455:
450:
443:
441:
435:
431:
428:
422:
418:
414:
410:
409:
408:
404:
400:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
381:
379:
375:
371:
367:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
325:
321:
317:
312:
308:
305:
301:
297:
293:
288:
284:
281:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
260:
257:
255:
250:
244:
243:
236:
233:
232:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
204:
200:
192:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
168:
164:
160:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
149:
128:
124:
120:
115:
110:
109:Status screen
106:
105:
102:
99:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
75:
70:
64:
63:
58:Status screen
56:
54:
48:
41:
36:
23:
19:
559:
558:
541:
522:
501:
496:
492:
475:
463:Anomalocaris
458:
439:
429:
365:
360:
352:
330:
263:
248:
245:
230:
229:
209:retargetting
208:
202:
176:
158:
157:
135:
133:
83:
68:
65:
52:
547:★Oliverlyc★
385:Zezizzebezt
161:- Per nom.
527:AerobicFox
171:Actually,
480:Thryduulf
413:Thryduulf
357:no point
199:WP:CHEAP
177:retarget
84:Retarget
20: |
370:Rossami
320:history
296:history
268:Peridon
217:Rossami
123:history
49:March 8
40:March 9
35:March 7
504:Johnny
459:Delete
374:(talk)
221:(talk)
159:Delete
138:Johnny
92:Ruslik
324:stats
300:stats
127:stats
43:: -->
16:<
542:Keep
531:talk
523:Keep
493:Keep
484:talk
476:Keep
467:talk
448:talk
430:Keep
417:talk
403:talk
389:talk
366:keep
361:type
353:have
342:talk
272:talk
264:Keep
203:Keep
185:talk
167:talk
97:Zero
32:<
510:Nin
497:not
336:".
215:.
144:Nin
86:to
22:Log
533:)
513:ja
507:Mr
486:)
469:)
432:-
419:)
405:)
391:)
344:)
334:pi
327:)
322:•
318:•
311:Pi
309:→
303:)
298:•
294:•
287:Pi
285:→
274:)
266:.
187:)
179:.
147:ja
141:Mr
130:)
125:•
121:•
112:→
90:.
529:(
482:(
465:(
451:)
445:(
415:(
401:(
387:(
340:(
314:(
290:(
270:(
183:(
165:(
117:(
94:_
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.