1418:
would help give him back his anonymity, but it won't. If anything, it'll probably help perpetuate the misinformation out there about him. It's a valid search term and it should remain, but we should have a subsection in the article about his misidentification and redirect his name to that section. (Such as "Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting#Investigation#Misidentification" or something like that.) That way it'd be easier for people to get straight to the information about him rather than to the article as a whole. At the very least we should redirect to the investigation section that goes over the info about him. But right now the deletion argument stems from people arguing that it hurts him. It does, I won't deny that. But it'd hurt both him and the completeness of
Knowledge to delete it for that reason. He is notable within the sphere of this tragedy, both for his relation to Adam Lanza and for how badly the media handled the misidentifying of him.
952:, per all arguments above. He is inherently connected to the case in a notable way, so even if clearing his name is an irrelevant consideration, this should still redirect. The only explicit argument that seems to have been made for deletion is the defamation point, but redirecting to correct information is clearly the opposite of that. Suppose there were another case in which a man was accused of a shooting that never actually occurred, the accusation went viral on Facebook, and this incident was covered by enough sources to satisfy Knowledge's notability guidelines. Would anyone argue that Knowledge still shouldn't have an article about that man because it would somehow encourage the defamation? ±
854:- One line of argument for delete is his lack of involvement in the shooting. But it is this fact, that he was initially misidentified as the shooter, and that he cooperated early in the investigation (and that these points are clearly explained in the article) that means his name is associated with the subject. OTOH, the other line of argument for delete involves BLP issues. Here I would defer to those with more expertise in this area. If there were agreement that this is a violation of BLP then I would support deletion. However, at this point there is no consensus on that.
975:
Freeman said all this stuff about
Newtown" despite evidence to the contrary. No, in fact, the best option is to simply remove it. That seems to clearly be the case here. The media is driven by ratings and profit. Knowledge is supposed to be a bit more refined. Again, we're not here to mop up and print corrections for every media outlet that messes up. We'd be here all day. We're here to post the best and most factual information we can get, and re-associating a person's name with a terrible event, despite your best intentions, is exactly in opposition to our BLP policy. --
451:. As others have said, this persons name is a likely search target and will remain so, therefore the only consideration is that the target is correct and there is no doubt it is. Yes we do have to be careful of BLP, but with a redirect in we are discouraging the creation of a biography we don't want, reducing the likelihood of a negative one being created. There is the chance of BLP-infringing material being added to the target but this is unaffected by the presence or absence of this redirect,
1102:- And I honestly hope if the outcome of this discussion is to keep that Jimbo will override it. This is a sickening disregard to BLP policy. You seriously want Knowledge to redirect this innocent persons name to the article about his mothers murder by his brother as encyclopedic? It isn't. Its guilt by association. I am not even going to bother reading any of the above comments. This is why some decisions of the community don't always stand and WMF has to step in.--
935:. Ryan Lanza is discussed in the article, and this redirect helps clarify that he was not involved in the shooting itself. It is standard procedure to make redirects for people mentioned in articles who do not merit their own articles at this time. The redirect should link to the section which explains his connection to the crime (misuse of his ID and the initial misidentification as the perpetrator). This redirect actually helps clear his name per BLP policy.
189:
713:- the people above saying 'Keep' obviously have no idea what our BLP policy says or why it exists. There is NO reason at all for this redirect to continue to exist. People should be given a page that simply shows an error. An error is the ONLY reason that any attention was directed to this man and it is not Knowledge's place to perpetuate or even try to fix what the media did as a screwup. Delete it immediately. --
1704:, I'm not sure which is better. The first has information about codecs in a few places through the article but no concentration and on the face of it redirecing "codec" to an article about software feels more logical to me. However the latter, has a directly relevant sentence at the top of a more generally relevant section. I'll leave a note about this discussion at
790:
shooter, or involving him in any in the story is libelous/slanderous. It isn't
Knowledge's job to take on the mission of trying to fix anything the media does wrong. Ryan Lanza needs to simply be left alone unless there is a solid reason for him to be included in this. That is what our BLP policy is meant to protect. Too many people here want to ignore that. --
1837:
makes me fear breaking links. Has it been at the old title long enough? Is it more important to get rid of vandalism and potentially alleviate confusion over the page title, or is it more important to avoid breaking links in page histories and on other websites? I see the benefits and weaknesses of both sides, so I'm neutral.
1039:- highly plausible search term, and mentioned in the article. The BLP arguments are pretty spurious given that the article specifically states that he was falsely identified as the shooter. And it's quite right that we mention him, even if only to correct misinformed readers; much in the same way that we have an article on
1979:
even mentioned doing so as a possible alternative to deletion: "I am suggesting deletion or redirection to the article on the production company." However, the closing administrator (and subsequent redirect creator) refuses to make this change. Note that the deletion discussion doesn't preclude doing
1139:
I understand that many people will fail to see what is right in front of them, but I am not interested in what others fail to see here. Just in what editors understand and can convey in written form. Something you have failed to do. I also know that people are still trying to upload images of Ryan as
374:
I did make the redirect while he was incorrectly identified as the shooter. But I think even as the incorrect person, he is a reasonable redirect, as people may get a hold of that name and look for the article, where we can correct the reader's incorrect information? On the other hand, I do certainly
1836:
Delete? Someone moved Sick etc. to Heavy etc. in
September, but it was apparently pagemove vandalism. I've moved it back to the previous title. Since it appears to have been pagemove vandalism, I was tempted to move it without a redirect, but the fact that it's been at Heavy etc. for three months
1412:
hate to say this, Ryan's name is a very valid search term. His name is fairly prevalent in the news, some of it because people are using it highlight how badly the news outlets handled and are still handling it. People are still misidentifying him and/or using his picture as if he was the killer. If
1199:
BLP with false accusations is tricky. While mentioning the accusation at all can be damaging--in the same way that negative political ads tend to "stick" even when immediately rebutted--not addressing it out could also raise readers' suspicions: "oh, he's guilty, Knowledge just won't touch it with a
759:
We only serve to reinforce it by leaving this redirect in place. Leaving the reader with nothing at all ensures that any such misinformation is never reinforced. Knowledge needs to follow BLP and leave the brother out of this entirely, unless some reasonable evidence is brought forward that shows he
695:
I am only weighing in because I had searched "Ryan Lanza" when looking for the article about the shooting. His was one of the names initially associated with the reporting and most of the reports continue to mention him if only to emphasise that he was not the shooter. The article contains prominent
1417:
the killer. I'd also go so far as to say that he should probably has a subsection in the investigation section that goes over his mis-identification as the killer and the poor judgement of the media in leaking this information to the public. I'd love to think that us removing his name as a redirect
591:
A horrific BLP issue that has no real rationale for existence. He is only related to the shooter and a victim, he had nothing tangible to do with the massacre and keeping this redirect only serves to imply guilt. The redirect from Nancy Lanza is valid since she is a victim of this spree, but not an
1158:
That people are still confusing them is another reason to keep the redirect. People searching for Ryan's name will be taken to the article where they are educated about who the perpetrator was, who Ryan is and why he was mistakenly identified as the shooter. Without the redirect people will remain
1116:
I fail to see guilt by association, since the redirect is just a name, and has no meaning on its own. The imputed guilt is lacking. A user entering the name could easily have misidentified the name with a victim and not with a perpretrator. In either case, the article provides clarification of the
774:
Just because he was not the perpetrator does not mean that he was not involved - the article covers the shootings and the aftermath, including the reaction to it and the investigation. Through no fault of his own Ryan is involved with both the media reaction and the investigation. By correctly and
1078:
No, anyone typing in that name in the internal search box will probably get a suggested link to the article (what is the benefit of this over a link?). Anyone accessing
Knowledge in any one of the myriad other ways that they can and do may or may not get a suggested link depending on the specific
989:
Does BLP require us to remove the information from the article that he was wrongly identified and reported repeatedly? I personally think that in itself is notable as part of the media feeding frenzy (which we are unfortunately part of). If the information in the article is removed, then I agree
974:
Please explain how he is "inherently connected to the case in a notable way", other than being wrongly identified as the shooter. If that is it, then you don't have real notability (per Wiki standards for sure), you have error. If a newspaper prints a retraction, we don't simply say "well, Morgan
789:
Your comment: "Through no fault of his own Ryan is involved with both the media reaction and the investigation" should be telling you that
Knowledge shouldn't be covering this guy. Until he is shown to have some actual involvement in things, the stuff the media is doing, like naming him as the
1204:
situation, far from being "horrible", it really is better from the perspective of "do no harm" to clearly state that the accusation is false. But since the guy is never going to have an article, and the
Facebook incident was a brief flash in the pan that will be quickly forgotten, I think a
413:
valid search term. Article even states that he was incorrectly identified as the shooter. Since he has been publicly identified with being the shooter, it is a term likely to be sought. As our article states he was incorrectly identified as such, we even have information on this person in the
909:
I dont know, maybe that the person that this article at one point wrongly named as somebody who killed 20 children shouldnt need to have a google search for his name turn up in the first several results the massacre that he was wrongly accused of committing for the rest of his life?
1173:
If we redirect a victim's name to the shooting article, we are not imputing that they are the shooter. You are assuming that redirecting a person's name to a crime article is the same as claiming they are the perpetrator of the crime, which is patently not the case. --
1064:-Anyone typing in that name will get a suggested link to the article anyway, as his name is mentioned in it. No need for a redirect that suggests anything more. The article isn't directly about him and to be on the safe side, it shouldn't be even suggested that it is.
827:
To be clear, I don't assert that it's our responsibility to actively dispel the misunderstanding; I assert that the redirect (which leads to an article in which Ryan Lanza is discussed in a manner consistent with widespread coverage by reliable sources) doesn't
678:
I find the above "BLP" arguments utterly baffling. Anyone searching for "Ryan Lanza" already is aware of his name in this context. The redirect, leading to an article in which the perpetrator's misidentification as this individual is explained, helps to
1561:
as "XMPP/Jabber" is very widely used on the internet to refer to the protocol, meaning it is a likely search term. That
Knowledge used to use / to designate subpages is completely irrelevant to this redirect - the risk of confusion is infinitesimal.
1299:
that the media F'd it up on this and reported him as the killer before they knew for sure, does not trump his BLP rights. The guy lost his mom and his brother did a horrendous act, there is not reason to tag him forever with this event on WP.
1079:
method used (some are predictable, some are not). Having a redirect from a person associated with a topic to the article about that topic is standard practice and does not imply that topic is about them - if it did we would have to rewrite our
308:
Problematic redirect from a BLP standpoint, although the article does currently mention him. I haven't looked at the timestamps, but I presume that it was created while he was incorrectly being reported as the shooter.
327:
to see what his role is in the shooting results in. He may have zero to do with it, at which I support deletion, but he may also because a figure in the incident, and thus would remain a valid search term redirct.
630:, since the outburst of people mistaking facebook for a law court has been picked up on by the media, and considering the likelyhood of the search term, we should keep this here to inform people of the truth.
606:
Except that he was taken into police custody, so is related to the investigation. His name appeared in media reports as mistakenly identified to be the shooter, so is related to the massacre's coverage. --
741:
the error, as we currently do). What section of the BLP policy do you believe calls for such action, and how is it consistent with the policy's goals? (As discussed above, readers typing "Ryan Lanza"
575:
the article clearly addresses the fact that he was originally misidentified as the shooter, and as such, his name will remain in the article. A redirect is the best way of handling this situation.
558:
intro of target addresses BLP concerns. At the moment I think this would be more likely to undo damage already done by the mass media than do further damage, but ask me again in a week or two.
821:
I'm baffled as to how a redirect to an article explaining the fact that Ryan Lanza was misidentified as the suspect reinforces a widespread perception to the contrary. Anyone typing his name
494:
1696:
as this gets a significant number of hits, and "PSP codec" is certainly a plausible search (although not for the current target). There are two alternative places we could point this,
825:
is familiar with it in the shooting's context. Some mistakenly believe that he's the suspect (and probably will continue to believe that unless and until they're informed otherwise).
39:
34:
1852:
Sick Wid It may have changed its name to Heavy on the Grind, but I can't find anything definitive on the matter. Certainly Heavy on the Grind was the label for E-40's recent albums.
1818:
737:
Specifically, you appear to assert that because an error was made, it's our responsibility to pretend that it never happened and scrub all traces from our encyclopedia (instead of
262:. After reading this discussion I think that Ryan Lanza will be better served by keep this redirect and targeting it to Investigation section, where the confusion is clarified.
1140:
Adam and that the media screwed this up badly and that it is our responsibility to keep these two seprated and not make them a single entity. As the redirecting editor admits:
1705:
1159:
ignorant, and some people would assume we don't have an article about the gunman and start one - that would be an actual BLP violation rather than an imagined one.
887:
What BLP issues are those? And what part of the BLP policy do you think trumps redirects from valid search terms to articles where the subject is discussed?
1984:: "The notability guidelines do not apply to article or list content (with the exception that some lists restrict inclusion to notable items or people)."
1006:
Several news outlets initially wrongly identified Lanza's brother as the shooter following a mistaken report to the
Associated Press by a police officer.
1324:
1724:
yes that's the point isn't it? without the redirect readers will find those articles. The notion of nailing a codec to hardware is intrinsically odd.
1535:
This redirect is a strange joining of XMPP, a communications protocol, and Jabber, its former name. It is no longer used since I changed the link at
434:, feels so.... On the other hand, the article is now always going to include "Ryan Lanza". Nasty case. Not sure of the best path forward here. --
21:
2006:
1976:
1972:
1943:
1404:
285:
1697:
349:
for the short term even if he does prove to be a appropriate search term at which point the redirect can be recreated and locked down. --
1262:
1241:
1206:
1175:
1118:
608:
536:
518:
415:
174:
1347:
show that the early misidentification is notable in relation to the subject. This strengthens my suspicion that the redirect should be
2039:
498:
116:
17:
1514:
1332:
290:
1675:
deletion. reason 1. unreasonably difficult search (PSP articles about codecs). 2. confusion - this is not the only codec on PSP
1382:
So that a bunch of other people in the media are morons means that Ryan should suffer? That makes absolutely no sense at all.
1657:
1543:. So now it's an orphan, an unlikely search term, and potentially misleading in its use of a slash (it was never a subpage). --
1240:
That person is neither involved in the shooting, nor significantly identified with the shooting. So it be brought to RFD. --
1853:
1826:
472:, this is the best article to which Ryan Lanza can be redirected, so long as his mention is not unnecessarily defamatory.--
1701:
1626:
1371:
1287:
808:
position constitutes a "mission of trying to fix anything the media does wrong" (by pretending that it never happened). —
657:-- the man is not involved in the shooting, and was misidentified in some early reports. It is absolutely a violaton of
399:
2081:
2047:
2018:
1932:
1863:
1846:
1800:
1736:
1717:
1687:
1639:
1571:
1552:
1496:
1429:
1391:
1375:
1309:
1291:
1270:
1249:
1235:
1214:
1183:
1168:
1153:
1126:
1111:
1092:
1073:
1056:
1018:
999:
984:
961:
944:
920:
896:
881:
863:
840:
812:
799:
784:
769:
754:
722:
705:
687:
670:
649:
616:
601:
567:
544:
526:
506:
481:
460:
443:
423:
403:
384:
361:
340:
318:
272:
208:
182:
162:
143:
100:
1948:
1325:
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/12/this-is-why-the-press-circulated-ryan-lanzas-facebook-page/266492/
804:
How is it defamatory to correctly document the fact that Ryan Lanza was misidentified as the suspect? In my view,
2077:
2014:
1989:
1928:
517:
also redirects there. Are you suggesting that all redirects from any person's name to this article be deleted? --
1904:
1777:
1612:
1470:
375:
see the argument that he would be normally worthy of "name protection" had he not previously been misidentified.
249:
77:
1413:
anything, it's probably more important than ever to have his name redirect here so that people can read that he
1283:
990:
that the redirect should be, however, if the article content is justifiable, then the redirect is as well imo.
701:
641:
430:
Hmmm. Probably a reasonable search term, but having a redirect, particularly given
Knowledge's visibility and
1210:
540:
1266:
1245:
1179:
1149:
1122:
1107:
750:
the misinformation that he was involved by failing to send them to an article explaining that he wasn't.) —
612:
522:
419:
395:
178:
2035:
636:
502:
2073:
2010:
2002:
1985:
1968:
1924:
1900:
1773:
1608:
1466:
1422:
314:
245:
202:
170:
124:
73:
1536:
1522:
53:
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 14, 2012
1860:
1359:
1318:
No. The fact "that the media F'd it up on this" has been and continues to be relevant. Articles from
1044:
940:
298:
1665:
511:
It's a redirect, not an article, and the article already contains "Ryan Lanza" in the text. Further
1813:
1713:
1567:
1321:
1164:
1088:
892:
780:
697:
597:
563:
456:
439:
158:
139:
1258:
1223:
1145:
1103:
1052:
1011:
995:
913:
874:
477:
380:
1956:
2032:
1842:
1795:
1732:
1683:
1634:
1367:
1333:
http://www.npr.org/2012/12/18/167466320/coverage-rapid-and-often-wrong-in-tragedys-early-hours
957:
859:
633:
267:
95:
1899:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
1772:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
1607:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
1465:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
746:
have read or heard the name in connection with the shooting, so we effectively would help to
244:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
72:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
1652:
1484:
1419:
1231:
310:
197:
2043:
1857:
1387:
1305:
1080:
1069:
980:
936:
837:
809:
795:
765:
751:
718:
684:
469:
357:
336:
188:
1854:
http://www.djbooth.net/index/albums/review/e-40-revenue-retrievin-day-shift-night-shift/
2069:
1709:
1563:
1201:
1160:
1084:
1040:
888:
776:
593:
559:
532:
452:
435:
154:
150:
135:
2065:
2061:
1981:
1920:
1548:
1492:
1048:
991:
666:
658:
473:
431:
394:. No reason why this redirect should exist. Person is 100% non-notable at this time.
376:
111:
1915:
1838:
1791:
1727:
1678:
1630:
1363:
953:
855:
263:
107:
91:
1227:
1340:
1383:
1301:
1065:
976:
791:
761:
714:
350:
345:
Though, given this is a redirect with almost no history, I would agree with a
329:
1142:"I did make the redirect while he was incorrectly identified as the shooter"
1893:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.
1766:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.
1601:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.
1459:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.
238:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.
153:. :-) If it's not a first great design, someone will improve it later. --
66:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.
1544:
1488:
662:
1997:
I've changed my mind on this since there is currently no discussion of
1975:, since a list isn't exactly conducive to discussion. The nominator in
2095:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
1877:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
1750:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
1585:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
1443:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
222:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
134:
I want (someone) to create Google's +1 here, that is also popular.
1998:
1939:
1004:
If it were me, his name would be removed, and all we would say is
775:
neutrally reporting these facts we are not reinforcing anything.
2089:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1871:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1744:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1579:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1540:
1509:
1437:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
216:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1337:
1329:
696:
and accurate descriptions of his connection to the topic. --
1144:. That is more than enough to know this is just wrong.--
195:
Quickly whipped something up. It's a start, I suppose. —
1952:
1822:
1808:
1661:
1647:
1518:
1504:
628:
keep information that he is not the shooter in the lead
513:
294:
280:
120:
836:
it is a side effect to which no one should object. —
1205:redirect does in this case do more harm than good.
1907:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1780:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1615:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1473:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1405:
Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting#Investigation
871:- BLP issues trump "valid search term" in my book.
252:). No further edits should be made to this section.
80:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1856:lists both Sick etc. and Heavy etc. on the label.
1706:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Video games/PlayStation
2068:no longer applies, and the opinion thus violates
1702:PlayStation Portable hardware#Multimedia playback
1627:PlayStation Portable hardware#Multimedia playback
661:to treat a living person in this libelious way.
535:'s comment below as an adequate reply to this. --
1043:, falsely identified as the person behind the
8:
1083:policies and delete thousands of redirects.
1341:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-20764908
497:the sort of thing you want to encourage? --
1117:linkage of the name with the event. --
731:think the BLP policy says, and why do
2007:List of Teletoon Original Productions
1977:the deletion discussion for this page
1973:List of Teletoon Original Productions
1944:List of Teletoon Original Productions
286:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting
7:
2072:as no valid reason is given for it.
1698:PlayStation Portable system software
592:unrelated relative. No, no, folks.
173:Knowledge is not a social club. --
149:Heh. Just un-redirect the page and
28:
18:Knowledge:Redirects for discussion
1913:The result of the discussion was
1786:The result of the discussion was
1621:The result of the discussion was
1479:The result of the discussion was
258:The result of the discussion was
86:The result of the discussion was
1809:Heavy on the Grind Entertainment
1758:Heavy on the Grind Entertainment
1708:to see what their thoughts are.
683:the damage to his reputation. —
493:. An absolute BLP nightmare. Is
187:
1992:) 01:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
2056:This user's opinion should be
2031:per my comments at the AFD. -
583:08:52, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
1:
2082:00:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
2048:22:33, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
2019:12:35, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
1967:This page should redirect to
1933:12:35, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
1864:14:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1847:02:43, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1801:11:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
1737:14:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
1718:19:59, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1688:12:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1640:11:46, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
1572:23:22, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1553:20:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1497:23:47, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1430:06:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
1392:05:52, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
1376:03:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
1310:02:07, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
1292:09:35, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
1271:06:30, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
1250:06:22, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
1236:15:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
1215:13:34, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
1184:06:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
1169:11:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
1154:06:01, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
1127:05:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
1112:04:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
1093:17:00, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
1074:15:06, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
1057:14:18, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
1019:16:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
1000:15:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
985:11:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
962:21:37, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
945:21:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
921:19:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
897:12:20, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
882:02:36, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
864:23:01, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
841:23:29, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
813:23:29, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
800:19:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
785:12:20, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
770:22:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
755:19:41, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
723:18:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
706:17:14, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
688:14:54, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
671:12:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
650:10:29, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
617:23:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
602:09:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
568:08:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
545:11:14, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
527:08:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
507:05:10, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
482:01:16, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
461:00:41, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
444:00:21, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
424:00:00, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
404:23:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
385:23:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
362:23:18, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
341:23:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
319:23:09, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
273:11:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
209:02:00, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
183:00:01, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
163:23:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
144:23:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
101:11:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
832:the problem. That it also
2112:
2092:Please do not modify it.
2005:, but it is included at
1896:Please do not modify it.
1874:Please do not modify it.
1769:Please do not modify it.
1747:Please do not modify it.
1604:Please do not modify it.
1582:Please do not modify it.
1462:Please do not modify it.
1440:Please do not modify it.
1282:as an IAR special case.
241:Please do not modify it.
219:Please do not modify it.
69:Please do not modify it.
1408:. As much as I really,
1226:has also been created.
2003:9 Story Entertainment
1969:9 Story Entertainment
1539:to point directly to
1403:Keep and redirect to
1200:ten foot pole". In a
1045:Olympic Park bombing
659:Knowledge BLP policy
1919:due to withdrawal (
1814:Sick Wid It Records
1284:Against the current
2064:for this issue as
396:Athene cunicularia
1962:
1949:links to redirect
1921:non-admin closure
1832:
1819:links to redirect
1671:
1658:links to redirect
1528:
1515:links to redirect
1379:
1362:comment added by
1261:for deletion. --
1257:I have nominated
1021:
923:
884:
584:
581:
304:
291:links to redirect
130:
117:links to redirect
2103:
2094:
2074:Dogmaticeclectic
2011:Dogmaticeclectic
1986:Dogmaticeclectic
1961:
1959:
1925:Dogmaticeclectic
1898:
1886:
1876:
1831:
1829:
1811:
1798:
1771:
1759:
1749:
1735:
1730:
1686:
1681:
1670:
1668:
1653:H.264/MPEG-4 AVC
1650:
1637:
1606:
1594:
1584:
1537:Saros (software)
1527:
1525:
1507:
1464:
1452:
1442:
1426:
1378:
1356:
1066:Gerard von Hebel
1014:
1009:
916:
911:
877:
872:
760:is involved. --
735:think it exists?
648:
646:
639:
585:
582:
580:
579:
531:I direct you to
516:
354:
333:
303:
301:
283:
270:
243:
231:
221:
205:
200:
191:
129:
127:
98:
71:
59:
44:
33:
2111:
2110:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2090:
2060:in determining
1946:
1905:deletion review
1894:
1888:
1884:
1881:
1872:
1816:
1807:
1796:
1778:deletion review
1767:
1761:
1757:
1754:
1745:
1726:
1725:
1677:
1676:
1655:
1646:
1635:
1613:deletion review
1602:
1596:
1592:
1589:
1580:
1512:
1503:
1471:deletion review
1460:
1454:
1450:
1447:
1438:
1424:
1357:
1012:
914:
875:
645:
642:
637:
631:
577:
576:
512:
352:
331:
288:
279:
268:
250:deletion review
239:
233:
229:
226:
217:
203:
198:
114:
96:
90:to a template.
78:deletion review
67:
61:
57:
51:
46:
45:
42:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2109:
2107:
2098:
2097:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2051:
2050:
1964:
1963:
1936:
1935:
1910:
1909:
1889:
1887:
1882:
1880:
1879:
1867:
1866:
1834:
1833:
1804:
1803:
1783:
1782:
1762:
1760:
1755:
1753:
1752:
1740:
1739:
1721:
1720:
1673:
1672:
1643:
1642:
1618:
1617:
1597:
1595:
1590:
1588:
1587:
1575:
1574:
1530:
1529:
1500:
1499:
1476:
1475:
1455:
1453:
1448:
1446:
1445:
1433:
1432:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1353:speedy deleted
1345:
1344:
1343:
1335:
1327:
1313:
1312:
1294:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1217:
1202:Richard Jewell
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1171:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1059:
1041:Richard Jewell
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
965:
964:
947:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
902:
901:
900:
899:
866:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
826:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
736:
708:
698:PalaceGuard008
690:
673:
652:
643:
621:
620:
619:
586:
570:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
487:
486:
485:
484:
446:
427:
426:
407:
406:
388:
387:
367:
366:
365:
364:
306:
305:
276:
275:
255:
254:
234:
232:
227:
225:
224:
212:
211:
185:
171:WP:NOTFACEBOOK
165:
132:
131:
104:
103:
83:
82:
62:
60:
55:
50:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2108:
2096:
2093:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1993:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1945:
1941:
1938:
1937:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1917:
1912:
1911:
1908:
1906:
1902:
1897:
1891:
1890:
1883:
1878:
1875:
1869:
1868:
1865:
1862:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1815:
1810:
1806:
1805:
1802:
1799:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1784:
1781:
1779:
1775:
1770:
1764:
1763:
1756:
1751:
1748:
1742:
1741:
1738:
1734:
1729:
1723:
1722:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1685:
1680:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1654:
1649:
1645:
1644:
1641:
1638:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1619:
1616:
1614:
1610:
1605:
1599:
1598:
1591:
1586:
1583:
1577:
1576:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1560:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1511:
1506:
1502:
1501:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1477:
1474:
1472:
1468:
1463:
1457:
1456:
1449:
1444:
1441:
1435:
1434:
1431:
1428:
1427:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1407:
1406:
1401:
1400:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1380:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1328:
1326:
1323:
1320:
1319:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1298:
1297:Speedy Delete
1295:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1278:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1263:70.24.247.127
1260:
1256:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1242:70.24.247.127
1239:
1238:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1207:71.58.222.181
1203:
1198:
1195:
1194:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1176:70.24.247.127
1172:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1146:Amadscientist
1143:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1119:70.24.247.127
1115:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1104:Amadscientist
1101:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1034:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1007:
1003:
1002:
1001:
997:
993:
988:
987:
986:
982:
978:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
963:
959:
955:
951:
948:
946:
942:
938:
934:
931:
930:
922:
918:
917:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
898:
894:
890:
886:
885:
883:
879:
878:
870:
867:
865:
861:
857:
853:
850:
842:
839:
835:
831:
824:
820:
814:
811:
807:
803:
802:
801:
797:
793:
788:
787:
786:
782:
778:
773:
772:
771:
767:
763:
758:
757:
756:
753:
749:
745:
740:
734:
730:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
712:
709:
707:
703:
699:
694:
691:
689:
686:
682:
677:
674:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
653:
651:
647:
640:
635:
629:
625:
622:
618:
614:
610:
609:70.24.247.127
605:
604:
603:
599:
595:
590:
589:Speedy delete
587:
574:
571:
569:
565:
561:
557:
554:
553:
546:
542:
538:
537:86.40.107.195
534:
530:
529:
528:
524:
520:
519:70.24.247.127
515:
510:
509:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:Speedy delete
489:
488:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
464:
463:
462:
458:
454:
450:
447:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
425:
421:
417:
416:70.24.247.127
412:
409:
408:
405:
401:
397:
393:
390:
389:
386:
382:
378:
373:
369:
368:
363:
359:
355:
348:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
326:
323:
322:
321:
320:
316:
312:
300:
296:
292:
287:
282:
278:
277:
274:
271:
265:
261:
257:
256:
253:
251:
247:
242:
236:
235:
228:
223:
220:
214:
213:
210:
207:
206:
201:
194:
190:
186:
184:
180:
176:
175:70.24.247.127
172:
169:
166:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
126:
122:
118:
113:
112:Template:Like
109:
106:
105:
102:
99:
93:
89:
85:
84:
81:
79:
75:
70:
64:
63:
56:
54:
48:
41:
36:
23:
19:
2091:
2088:
2057:
2033:Presidentman
2028:
2024:
1994:
1966:
1965:
1914:
1895:
1892:
1873:
1870:
1835:
1787:
1768:
1765:
1746:
1743:
1693:
1674:
1622:
1603:
1600:
1581:
1578:
1558:
1532:
1531:
1480:
1461:
1458:
1439:
1436:
1423:
1414:
1409:
1402:
1358:— Preceding
1352:
1351:rather than
1348:
1296:
1279:
1254:
1222:please that
1219:
1196:
1141:
1099:
1061:
1036:
1010:
1005:
949:
932:
912:
873:
868:
851:
833:
829:
822:
805:
747:
743:
738:
732:
728:
710:
692:
680:
675:
654:
627:
623:
588:
572:
555:
499:86.40.198.87
490:
465:
448:
414:article. --
410:
391:
372:creator keep
371:
346:
324:
307:
259:
240:
237:
218:
215:
196:
192:
167:
133:
87:
68:
65:
52:
2058:disregarded
1916:speedy keep
1505:XMPP/Jabber
1451:XMPP/Jabber
1420:Tokyogirl79
1259:Peter Lanza
1224:Peter Lanza
739:documenting
514:Nancy Lanza
311:Bongwarrior
151:get started
108:Template:+1
58:Template:+1
49:December 14
40:December 15
35:December 13
1858:TimBentley
1008:Thats it.
937:Jokestress
838:David Levy
830:exacerbate
810:David Levy
752:David Levy
685:David Levy
432:principles
281:Ryan Lanza
230:Ryan Lanza
136:Tito Dutta
1995:Withdraw:
1901:talk page
1774:talk page
1710:Thryduulf
1648:PSP codec
1609:talk page
1593:PSP codec
1564:Thryduulf
1485:WP:BEFORE
1481:withdrawn
1467:talk page
1161:Thryduulf
1085:Thryduulf
889:Thryduulf
777:Thryduulf
748:reinforce
594:Lizabetha
560:2010 SO16
533:Lizabetha
453:Thryduulf
436:MZMcBride
246:talk page
155:MZMcBride
88:Converted
74:talk page
2044:Talkback
2040:contribs
1903:or in a
1776:or in a
1694:Retarget
1623:Retarget
1611:or in a
1487:fail. --
1469:or in a
1372:contribs
1360:unsigned
1322:Atlantic
1081:WP:BLP1E
1049:Robofish
1013:nableezy
992:Gaijin42
915:nableezy
876:nableezy
834:counters
727:What do
634:filelake
474:Jax 0677
470:WP:CHEAP
377:Gaijin42
248:or in a
193:Comment:
76:or in a
20: |
2070:WP:POLL
1980:so per
1953:history
1839:Nyttend
1823:history
1728:Widefox
1679:Widefox
1662:history
1519:history
1425:(。◕‿◕。)
1364:Begnome
1255:COMMENT
958:" *** "
954:Lenoxus
856:Begnome
823:already
744:already
681:counter
295:history
204:polisme
168:Comment
121:history
2066:WP:GNG
2062:WP:CON
2025:Delete
1982:WP:GNG
1971:, not
1960:)
1861:(talk)
1830:)
1792:Ruslik
1788:Delete
1669:)
1631:Ruslik
1533:Delete
1526:)
1410:really
1280:Delete
1228:Drmies
1197:Delete
1100:Delete
1062:Delete
869:Delete
711:Delete
655:Delete
578:Canuck
468:- Per
392:Delete
347:Delete
302:)
264:Ruslik
128:)
92:Ruslik
1999:Futz!
1957:stats
1940:Futz!
1885:Futz!
1827:stats
1666:stats
1523:stats
1415:isn't
1384:Arzel
1302:Arzel
977:Avanu
792:Avanu
762:Avanu
715:Avanu
693:Keep.
676:Keep.
299:stats
125:stats
43:: -->
16:<
2078:talk
2036:talk
2029:SALT
2027:and
2015:talk
1990:talk
1929:talk
1843:talk
1797:Zero
1733:talk
1714:talk
1684:talk
1636:Zero
1568:talk
1559:Keep
1549:talk
1541:XMPP
1510:XMPP
1493:talk
1388:talk
1368:talk
1349:kept
1306:talk
1288:talk
1267:talk
1246:talk
1232:talk
1220:NOTE
1211:talk
1180:talk
1165:talk
1150:talk
1123:talk
1108:talk
1089:talk
1070:talk
1053:talk
1037:Keep
996:talk
981:talk
950:Keep
941:talk
933:Keep
893:talk
860:talk
852:Keep
806:your
796:talk
781:talk
766:talk
719:talk
702:Talk
667:talk
638:shoe
626:and
624:Keep
613:talk
598:talk
573:Keep
564:talk
556:Keep
541:talk
523:talk
503:talk
495:this
478:talk
466:Keep
457:talk
449:Keep
440:talk
420:talk
411:Keep
400:talk
381:talk
353:ASEM
332:ASEM
325:Wait
315:talk
269:Zero
260:Keep
199:Theo
179:talk
159:talk
140:talk
97:Zero
32:<
2001:at
1923:).
1700:or
1625:to
1545:BDD
1489:BDD
1483:as
1355:.
1338:BBC
1330:NPR
733:you
729:you
663:N2e
22:Log
2080:)
2046:)
2038:·
2017:)
2009:.
1955:•
1951:•
1942:→
1931:)
1845:)
1825:•
1821:•
1812:→
1790:.
1731:;
1716:)
1682:;
1664:•
1660:•
1651:→
1629:.
1570:)
1551:)
1521:•
1517:•
1508:→
1495:)
1390:)
1374:)
1370:•
1308:)
1290:)
1269:)
1248:)
1234:)
1213:)
1182:)
1167:)
1152:)
1125:)
1110:)
1091:)
1072:)
1055:)
1047:.
1017:-
998:)
983:)
960:)
943:)
919:-
895:)
880:-
862:)
798:)
783:)
768:)
721:)
704:)
669:)
632:-
615:)
600:)
566:)
543:)
525:)
505:)
480:)
459:)
442:)
422:)
402:)
383:)
360:)
339:)
328:--
317:)
309:--
297:•
293:•
284:→
181:)
161:)
142:)
123:•
119:•
110:→
2076:(
2042:(
2013:(
1988:(
1947:(
1927:(
1841:(
1817:(
1794:_
1712:(
1656:(
1633:_
1566:(
1547:(
1513:(
1491:(
1386:(
1366:(
1304:(
1286:(
1265:(
1244:(
1230:(
1209:(
1178:(
1163:(
1148:(
1121:(
1106:(
1087:(
1068:(
1051:(
994:(
979:(
956:(
939:(
891:(
858:(
794:(
779:(
764:(
717:(
700:(
665:(
644:
611:(
596:(
562:(
539:(
521:(
501:(
476:(
455:(
438:(
418:(
398:(
379:(
370:'
358:t
356:(
351:M
337:t
335:(
330:M
313:(
289:(
266:_
177:(
157:(
138:(
115:(
94:_
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.