101:
49:
122:. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014. Old RfC/Us can be found in
123:
107:
77:
34:
85:
30:
17:
141:
119:
118:
on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific
Knowledge (XXG) editors, as part of the
68:
67:
If you wish to restart discussion on the status of this page, seek community input at a forum such as the
56:
60:
48:
38:
111:
115:
135:
95:
43:
124:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive
76:
The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of
29:WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for
35:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/User names
88:processes should be used for conduct issues.
8:
31:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations
7:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment
114:that was closed in December 2014,
55:This page has been closed down by
24:
99:
47:
1:
59:, and is retained only for
158:
120:dispute resolution process
33:(formerly WP:RFCU) or for
28:
142:Inactive project pages
116:requests for comment
57:community consensus
26:historical document
86:dispute resolution
130:
129:
94:
93:
149:
103:
102:
96:
90:
72:
51:
44:
157:
156:
152:
151:
150:
148:
147:
146:
132:
131:
100:
78:this discussion
73:
66:
42:
27:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
155:
153:
145:
144:
134:
133:
128:
127:
104:
92:
91:
82:
74:
65:
52:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
154:
143:
140:
139:
137:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
98:
97:
89:
87:
81:
79:
70:
64:
62:
58:
53:
50:
46:
45:
40:
36:
32:
19:
112:Village Pump
108:a discussion
83:
75:
69:village pump
54:
39:WP:RFC/NAME
63:reference.
61:historical
106:Prior to
136:Category
110:at the
84:Other
16:<
138::
126:.
80:.
71:.
41:)
37:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
