Knowledge

:Requests for comment/User names - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

606:- This reminds me of my own RFCN back in the day, in which someone mistook my username for an abbreviation for some sort of organization. I can see how the confusion could arise, but I don't believe it is to the point that the username is problematic. 331dot's capitalization argument is a non-issue for me, since capitalizing the first letter in each part of a name is standard in English. I also do not believe this username is "official sounding", but maybe it sounds more official outside of American English. - 63: 370:
Agreed. That's the main reason I suggested a block in my initial correspondence at the admin's talk page, to require the account to communicate. I've seen "silent" accounts finally start talking with the community for the first time after being blocked, since it's the only way they can get back to
534:
Hi, I can assure you that my username has not connection to any orginization. It was just a collection of random words which I selected when making the account (which is mostly college football edits) of course I’d like to keep my account, however, if the name serves any issues, then a block is
174:
If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Knowledge's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g.
434:. It also appears that they edit from a mobile device, and the notroiously awful mobile app does not support talk page notifications. At a certain point that doesn't matter if the user is causing actual problems, but, again, that has not been established. 422:
I don't think that is in alignment with the username policy, "official sounding" is not generally a violation. Also, "North Coast Football" without evidence to the contrary, could easily just indicate an interest in... wait for it... football on the north
355:
in Australia, but that's probably a coincidence. I think a bigger problem than the username though is that this is a zero-communication account that has gone a year without making any edits outside mainspace. That's bound to cause problems down the line.
243:, rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion. 460:
I don’t consider this name to be “official sounding” at all, and see no connection to the North Coast Athletic Conference or any other entity, as “north coast” is a somewhat common geographical reference.
484:. They are clearly referencing the North Coast football conference, as opposed to a generic "north coast"(no caps). They may not be affiliated with the organization, so I would just soft block. 77: 118: 560:
to request a username change. No need to create a new account. I don't personally see the issue with your username but this would avoid an unnecessary block if other people do.
310:
My main question would be this:is there a real organization by this name, and is there any link between that organization and the content the user has been editing? Just
114: 107: 73: 501:
As someone who is not a football person, it doesn't feel official to me and seems okay. Would a compromise position be using lowercase for the username?
269: 637: 430:
concerns expressed here either, as the only talk page messages they've gotten were regarding their username, which has not been proven to be an
102:. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all: 334: 540: 263: 17: 167:
has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
590: 438: 326: 557: 184: 134:
you wish to have the block of a user reviewed. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator (see also
586:
I'm certainly not seeing a consensus here that the name is disallowed, so you can also just keep it if you prefer.
191:). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of 393: 389: 135: 99: 551: 536: 259: 587: 435: 323: 192: 518:
this is descriptive rather than promotional. There's no actual entity it is promoting as far as I can see.
523: 469: 179: 152: 23: 285: 407: 376: 352: 342: 297: 157: 622: 592: 581: 544: 527: 510: 493: 476: 440: 417: 380: 365: 346: 328: 301: 506: 106:
Report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, to
34: 519: 464: 227: 223: 489: 360: 427: 398: 372: 338: 293: 333:
That's a good question; the account is focused on editing college football and there's a
613: 201: 631: 576: 535:
understandable and I can start a different account under a different, unrelated name
502: 113:
For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try
62: 248:
Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the list.
485: 357: 607: 178: 151: 164:) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page. 388:
With a username that includes an official sounding football inference, is
562: 143:
Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:
276:
Username seems to imply shared/organizational use of the account.
289: 281: 277: 82: 49: 42: 119:
Knowledge:Administrator intervention against vandalism
314:an organization isn't enough. If all you've got is 292:who suggested this venue as a possible solution. 148:has been warned about their username (with e.g. 115:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 108:Knowledge:Usernames for administrator attention 131:the user in question has made no recent edits. 8: 117:; blatant vandalism can also be reported at 57: 198:Add new requests below, using the syntax 290:raised the concern with an administrator 24:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Usernames 426:I'm actually not sure I agree with the 286:the account has continued editing today 94:This page is for bringing attention to 83: 78:Instructions for closing administrators 315: 136:Knowledge:Blocking policy § Unblocking 121:, which is sometimes a better option. 7: 31: 284:with no response to either, and 61: 335:North Coast Athletic Conference 638:Knowledge requests for comment 623:17:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 582:22:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 545:14:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 528:18:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 511:15:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 494:08:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 477:03:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 441:01:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 418:01:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 381:00:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 366:23:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 347:23:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 329:23:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 302:23:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC) 18:Knowledge:Requests for comment 1: 239:Please remember that this is 98:which may be in violation of 593:00:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC) 558:Special:GlobalRenameRequest 100:Knowledge's username policy 654: 282:warned again four days ago 32: 185: 176: 158: 149: 170:is not already blocked. 278:Warned over a year ago 318:then I'd have to say 552:North Coast Football 537:North Coast Football 353:North Coast Football 260:North Coast Football 255:North Coast Football 126:Do NOT post here if: 392:and surely implies 588:Just Step Sideways 436:Just Step Sideways 371:editing articles. 324:Just Step Sideways 186:UsernameDiscussion 415: 228:Special:BlockList 224:Special:ListUsers 92: 91: 22:(Redirected from 645: 621: 616: 610: 580: 579: 573: 572: 569: 566: 555: 475: 472: 467: 416: 412: 405: 403: 190: 187: 183: 163: 160: 156: 88: 87: 85: 84:Purge page cache 70: 65: 58: 52: 45: 27: 653: 652: 648: 647: 646: 644: 643: 642: 628: 627: 619: 618: 614: 608: 575: 570: 567: 564: 563: 561: 549: 470: 465: 462: 408: 399: 397: 363: 362:it has begun... 288:. I previously 257: 237: 81: 72: 68: 56: 55: 48: 41: 37: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 651: 649: 641: 640: 630: 629: 626: 625: 612: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 531: 530: 513: 496: 479: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 432:actual problem 424: 361: 349: 316:seems to imply 305: 304: 256: 253: 252: 251: 250: 236: 233: 232: 172: 171: 168: 165: 140: 139: 132: 123: 122: 111: 90: 89: 66: 54: 53: 46: 38: 33: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 650: 639: 636: 635: 633: 624: 617: 611: 605: 602: 601: 594: 591: 589: 585: 584: 583: 578: 574: 559: 556:You can use 553: 548: 547: 546: 542: 538: 533: 532: 529: 525: 521: 517: 514: 512: 508: 504: 500: 497: 495: 491: 487: 483: 480: 478: 474: 473: 468: 459: 456: 455: 442: 439: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 420: 419: 413: 411: 404: 402: 395: 391: 387: 384: 383: 382: 378: 374: 369: 368: 367: 364: 359: 354: 351:There's also 350: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 331: 330: 327: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308: 307: 306: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 274: 273: 271: 268: 265: 261: 254: 249: 246: 245: 244: 242: 234: 231: 230: 229: 225: 219: 217: 214: 211: 208: 205: 203: 196: 194: 188: 181: 169: 166: 161: 154: 147: 146: 145: 144: 137: 133: 130: 129: 128: 127: 120: 116: 112: 109: 105: 104: 103: 101: 97: 86: 79: 75: 67: 64: 60: 59: 51: 47: 44: 40: 39: 36: 25: 19: 603: 520:Secretlondon 515: 507:my talk page 498: 481: 463: 457: 431: 410:open channel 409: 400: 385: 319: 312:looking like 311: 266: 258: 247: 240: 238: 221: 220: 215: 212: 209: 206: 199: 197: 173: 142: 141: 125: 124: 95: 93: 280:, and then 159:uw-username 43:WP:RFC/NAME 401:FlightTime 394:shared use 390:misleading 373:Left guide 358:* Pppery * 339:Left guide 294:Left guide 241:not a vote 195:template. 69:Navigation 386:Disallow: 96:usernames 35:Shortcuts 632:Category 503:Jessamyn 482:Disallow 428:WP:RADAR 270:contribs 207:username 200:{{subst: 74:Archives 235:Reports 222:Tools: 50:WP:RFCN 499:Allow. 486:331dot 471:Anchor 458:Allow. 423:coast. 216:~~~~}} 213:reason 604:Allow 516:Allow 466:Frank 320:Allow 202:rfcn1 180:subst 153:subst 16:< 609:ZLEA 541:talk 524:talk 490:talk 377:talk 343:talk 298:talk 264:talk 193:this 210:|2= 71:: 634:: 577:💬 543:) 526:) 509:) 492:) 396:- 379:) 345:) 337:. 322:. 300:) 272:) 226:, 218:. 189:}} 177:{{ 162:}} 150:{{ 138:). 80:• 76:• 620:\ 615:T 571:A 568:F 565:C 554:: 550:@ 539:( 522:( 505:( 488:( 414:) 406:( 375:( 341:( 296:( 267:· 262:( 204:| 182:: 155:: 110:. 26:)

Index

Knowledge:Requests for comment
Knowledge:Requests for comment/Usernames
Shortcuts
WP:RFC/NAME
WP:RFCN

Archives
Instructions for closing administrators
Purge page cache
Knowledge's username policy
Knowledge:Usernames for administrator attention
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
Knowledge:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Knowledge:Blocking policy § Unblocking
subst
uw-username
subst
UsernameDiscussion
this
rfcn1
Special:ListUsers
Special:BlockList
North Coast Football
talk
contribs
Warned over a year ago
warned again four days ago
the account has continued editing today
raised the concern with an administrator
Left guide

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑