112:
This user has done some great work on the articles he created (see above). I have two reasons for opposing: 1) Low edit count. I don't expect a user to have 4000 edits before RfA, but I would like to see more than his current 425. 2) Lack of experience dealing with controversial situations. I took a
167:
Yes, I can see you've been around for a while, but I don't see a consistent level of dedication to the project during that time (there are significant gaps in time between some of your contributions). I do not consider this to be
152:
I'm not a huge edit counter, but I expect more than 425 edits from a prospective admin. I will most likely support when the user has more experience, both in terms of edit number and interaction with the community.
142:
Great user, but he hasn't made enough edits. As much as I hate edit number standards, I have to oppose this user. However, if you come back later with more edits, I would definitely support you.
420:
had been protected really pissed me off (check the page´s discussion). But it´s over now and I´ll always discuss a change I believe is controversial before actually editing an article
255:
Never. Many of your contributions are of very doubtful usefulness (I still remember "Quarto do
Chefinho" from VfD) and you fail at the task of placing a simple image on an article (
412:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
435:
354:
321:
I personally don't like the comment about "enhancing my skills". Sysops are supposed to have the skills required ready, not the other way round.
218:
When he nominated himself, he put the nomination in the "nominations" section (instead of the "self nominations" section), and I had to move it.
117:
and wasn't very impressed with the comments in the "Author here" section. I'd prefer that WP admins didn't end comments with "Thanks, morons".
361:
Helping new people in figuring out what they can do - and what´s to do - in
Knowledge; being able to edit polemical pages such as
17:
45:
I nominate myself because I believe sysop abilities would enhance my range of skills in
Knowledge so as to keep improving it.
87:
I´ve recently put fair use tags in all images I uploaded since I joined
Knowledge, a project of which I am enthusiast.
380:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
350:
129:
114:
276:
91:
27:
397:
256:
169:
77:
53:
143:
136:
212:
Not enough experience. I expect people to have at least 1,200 edits before requesting adminship.
186:
417:
385:
362:
161:
146:
57:
230:
I don't like the "Thanks, morons" comment. I may support later but definitely not this time.
295:
267:
73:
349:
What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about
315:
249:
238:
189:
176:
122:
328:
By the way I just noticed that the end date is wrong; it should be
February not January.
260:
179:
429:
365:, which I created originally; quickly reverting pages where I see vandalism, such as
133:
389:
366:
329:
322:
231:
65:
61:
393:
292:
69:
49:
35:
311:
173:
118:
132:
mentioned by Carrp is not so hot. In any case, there are not enough edits --
401:
81:
370:
154:
266:
I base my decision on
JuntungWu's comment about skills (below). --
404:, because I could put Bilac´s poems in it; and even a book of mine
38:
209:
22:51, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC) Sorry. I oppose, for several reasons:
128:
Quick check of his talk comments: Most seem to be OK, but the
400:, because I really like their poems and songs,respectively.
341:
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
242:
388:, because he himself and I changed e-mails about it.
221:He linked this page wrong and forgot to change the
8:
90:I´ve been here for quite some time, as well.
392:, because I think it looks really nice.
225:. ''' (0/6/0) ending 21:51 ] ] (UTC)'''
160:Not enought experience yet, sorry. --
7:
436:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
24:
48:Original articles I made include
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
170:characteristic of a good admin
1:
355:administrators' reading list
34:final (0,12,1) ending 21:51
337:Questions for the candidate
452:
245:] 02:23, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
215:Not enough edit summaries.
281:17:29, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)
252:06:22, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
94:00:10, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
332:17:41, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
325:17:38, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
300:06:20, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
263:16:49, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
259:). Strong opposition. --
164:08:00, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
157:04:29, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
139:00:51, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
318:00:11, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
291:Not enough experience.
234:17:44, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
182:18:10, 2005 Feb 8 (UTC)
149:03:57, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
125:00:25, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
130:Talk:Olavo de Carvalho
115:Talk:Olavo de Carvalho
402:Wikisource Português
398:The Underdog Project
257:The Underdog Project
82:Wikisource Português
78:The Underdog Project
248:Agree with above.
418:Olavo de Carvalho
386:Olavo de Carvalho
363:Olavo de Carvalho
298:
58:Olavo de Carvalho
443:
296:
279:
273:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
92:Doidimais Brasil
28:Doidimais Brasil
451:
450:
446:
445:
444:
442:
441:
440:
426:
425:
277:
271:
268:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
449:
447:
439:
438:
428:
427:
424:
423:
413:
407:
381:
375:
358:
351:administrators
339:
334:
333:
326:
319:
302:
301:
283:
282:
269:
264:
253:
246:
235:
228:
227:
226:
219:
216:
213:
183:
165:
158:
150:
140:
126:
104:
103:
80:. I also made
54:Diogo Mainardi
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
448:
437:
434:
433:
431:
421:
419:
414:
411:
408:
405:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
382:
379:
376:
373:
372:
368:
364:
359:
356:
352:
348:
345:
344:
343:
342:
338:
331:
327:
324:
320:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
306:
299:
294:
290:
289:
288:
287:
280:
274:
265:
262:
258:
254:
251:
247:
244:
240:
236:
233:
229:
224:
220:
217:
214:
211:
210:
208:
188:
184:
181:
178:
175:
171:
166:
163:
159:
156:
151:
148:
145:
141:
138:
135:
131:
127:
124:
120:
116:
111:
110:
109:
108:
102:
101:
100:
99:
95:
93:
88:
85:
83:
79:
75:
74:Baldur´s Gate
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
46:
43:
42:
40:
37:
29:
26:
19:
416:Finding out
415:
409:
390:Holy Avenger
383:
377:
367:World War II
360:
346:
340:
336:
335:
304:
303:
285:
284:
222:
162:Slowking Man
106:
105:
97:
96:
89:
86:
66:Marista Hall
62:Holy Avenger
47:
44:
33:
32:
394:Olavo Bilac
237:Not yet --
70:Chris Jones
50:Olavo Bilac
36:14 February
310:425 edits
250:Neutrality
239:Francs2000
330:JuntungWu
323:JuntungWu
261:Sn0wflake
232:JuntungWu
430:Category
371:Cold War
353:and the
305:Comments
223:username
134:Chris 73
113:look at
286:Neutral
144:Bart133
98:Support
107:Oppose
76:, and
384:Yes.
312:Carrp
187:Lst27
172:. --
119:Carrp
41:(UTC)
16:<
396:and
369:and
316:Talk
293:ugen
278:Talk
272:yan!
243:Talk
180:🇪🇺
174:Grun
137:Talk
123:Talk
39:2005
155:Rje
147:(t)
432::
410:3.
378:2.
357:.)
347:1.
314:|
297:64
275:|
241:|
185:--
153:--
121:|
84:.
72:,
68:,
64:,
60:,
56:,
52:,
422:.
406:.
374:.
270:R
206:)
203:k
200:l
197:a
194:t
191:(
177:t
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.