254:. Three things. First, after looking at your revision history, the overwhelming majority of your edits are marked as minor edits. Just because you've got a huge amount of minor edits doesn't mean you're qualified as an admin. Second, after reviewing your major edits, and some of your minor edits, it seems like you are very biased. Some of your edits, particuarly those concerning Nazism and Adolf Hitler, have alarmed me. Third, where are all of the edit summaries? Even a short tidbit would be better than nothing.
174:
administrators must be familiar with many different policies and suggestions. This is your second self-nomination; you should be able to follow the directions on the RfA page, leaving others to clean up after you. Sloppy editing isn't desirable even in articles, but from someone with administrative abilities it could be dangerous. —
388:
Neutral because this user has very few edits in talk (17), user talk (19), and
Knowledge (about 18 non-RFA-related) namespaces. Although he seems to have strong janitor skills, the lack of communication means I cannot vote for this candidate. I'd need to see evidence that this user likes people and
114:
add to Tony's point below that this RFA is far too laconic for a self-nomination. Even the "generic questions" are missing. All other self-nominators attempt to make some sort of case for themselves. I might change to neutral or even support if he follows up with some convincing statement that will
131:
Several issues that were raised during the previous RfA have not been addressed since then by Haham hanuka. Two of these have already been mentioned: the RfA format and the lack of
Knowledge namespace edits. Another issue is almost every edit being marked as minor, which is very unhelpful to other
400:
I strongly urge this candidate to resubmit after talking more, marking fewer edits a "minor" and the like. This is to my mind a very frustrating candidacy. The evidence is there in the edits, but the community involvement isn't. A potentially great administrator if only he'd get more involved.
173:
address our concerns before you nominate yourself again. With such a sparse nomination and not answering the standard questions, it is difficult to know anything about you. Nor have you addressed why you want to be an administrator or what you'd do with administrative abilities. Finally,
168:
Needs to address the issues brought during previous RfA. Malformed nomination (missing votes, end times, and questions). Nomination text consisting solely of edit count and time on
Knowledge. Needs more edit summaries and fewer minor edits. Haham, you seem like a good editor, but
469:
have every chance of participating, you just need to do it. being an admin will only allow you to protect/unprotect pages and ban/unban users. Every other janitor task you can already do, no problem. Also, we don't know how you react under stress.
115:
tell us who we're dealing with, and why he needs admin privileges. HH even left it to me to point out that his first self-nom failed one month ago, with a clear 2:9. Much less does he give any sort of hint why he thinks people should reconsider.
457:
I'm addicted to
Knowledge for more than a year. I'm active in the Hebrew Wikipdia too, I think that you should give me a chance and I promise I would be a good Admin. Feel free to ask me questions here.
518:
Haham hanuka currently has 1442 total edits: 1240/17 to articles/talk, 60/19 to User/talk, 54/1 to Image/talk, 42 to
Knowledge, 4/1 to Template/talk, and 3/1 to Category/talk. —
424:
Having taken a closer look at this user's contributions I change my vote from opposed to neutral. A good editor but I'd like to see him answer the standard RfA questions. --
220:. Don't take it personally, but adminship is not just based on how many edits you have; your statement above for your nomination "more than 1400 edits in 6 months --
438:
572:
366:
Does he want to turn
Knowledge into a larger channel for the filth that floods the Internet already? Gimme a break, this should not be happening!
187:
for all the reasons others mentioned. If this users doesn't follow the procedure to nominate himself that doesn't bode well for other rules.
143:
Way too many edits (and for important articles) do not have edit summaries. I cannot stress how much of time this wastes for RC checkers.
341:
100:
153:. Another issue in this user's previous RFA that has not been resolved (as of this writing): Haham hanuka has not yet followed the
154:
17:
537:
510:
178:
262:
23:
224:
12:06, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)" isn't enough; you also need some more community envolvement and edit summaries. --
192:
406:
394:
534:
530:
507:
338:
175:
97:
287:
I promise to be on the support side after a few more months and seeing more major edits involvement.--
209:
144:
487:
446:
137:
120:
425:
279:
188:
389:
can communicate well with other editors--skills that you need a lot if you use admin powers. --
225:
478:
At least answer the generic questions every other admin candidate is asked. We don't even know
459:
402:
390:
374:
353:
350:, and I have close to twenty thousand edits and not the slightest interest in being an admin.
221:
162:
47:
34:
523:
303:
62:
228:
200:
483:
442:
255:
133:
116:
566:
273:
529:
I know that what happens on other
Wikipedias is largely irrelevant to RFA here, but
473:
158:
519:
357:
288:
554:
299:
295:
367:
266:
418:
356:'s user page is that he LOVES writing and adding to articles about young
132:
editors. With more experience and community involvment, I will support.
506:
questions, have you considered answering the standard RfA questions? —
157:. How can one be an admin when xe cannot follow simple directions.
272:
Adminship isn't something you just get for having a lot of edits.
476:
last week. Would you just have used your admin powers for that?
360:
movie "actresses" and is very keen on listing links to their
24:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Haham hanuka (2)
41:final (0/14/3) ending 12:06, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
8:
553:? oh dear me. what will he think of next?
531:User talk:Merovingian#Search Engine Fraud
482:you want to be given a chance of doing.
472:You seem to have attempted to unprotect
302:have said, I am changing my vote. --
7:
417:for the same reasons given by Tony.
573:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
46:more than 1400 edits in 6 months --
31:
155:guidelines to nominate one to RFA
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
364:sites, now why is that exactly?
547:Oh. he's asking for adminship
1:
526:) 14:31, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
284:) 19:57, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
589:
462:14:28, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
421:14:26, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
397:13:20, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
344:11:50, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
258:18:10, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
194:21:49, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
103:02:36, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
557:19:15, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
540:17:36, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
513:07:54, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
495:15:08, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
454:12:25, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
441:failed 2:9 on 20 March.
428:01:20, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
409:14:55, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
377:10:40, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
370:11:53, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
291:09:28, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
269:07:23, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
248:22:25, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
214:21:48, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
181:05:37, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
165:21:24, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
147:18:34, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
140:14:29, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
128:14:15, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
50:12:06, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
439:first self-nomination
352:All I can tell from
498:Rather than having
294:After hearing what
533:is interesting. —
263:my admin criterion
494:
453:
354:User:Haham hanuka
127:
22:(Redirected from
580:
535:Knowledge Seeker
508:Knowledge Seeker
486:
445:
336:
333:
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
315:
312:
309:
306:
282:
246:
243:
240:
237:
234:
231:
212:
207:
204:
176:Knowledge Seeker
119:
95:
92:
89:
86:
83:
80:
77:
74:
71:
68:
65:
27:
588:
587:
583:
582:
581:
579:
578:
577:
563:
562:
334:
331:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
304:
280:
252:Strongly Oppose
244:
241:
238:
235:
232:
229:
218:Strongly Oppose
210:
205:
202:
151:Strongly oppose
145:Pavel Vozenilek
93:
90:
87:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
66:
63:
38:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
586:
584:
576:
575:
565:
564:
561:
560:
559:
558:
542:
541:
527:
516:
515:
514:
496:
455:
430:
429:
422:
412:
411:
410:
381:
379:
378:
371:
345:
292:
285:
270:
261:Does not meet
259:
249:
215:
195:
182:
166:
148:
141:
129:
106:
105:
54:
37:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
585:
574:
571:
570:
568:
556:
552:
551:
546:
545:
544:
543:
539:
536:
532:
528:
525:
521:
517:
512:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
491:
485:
481:
477:
475:
468:
464:
463:
461:
456:
452:
450:
444:
440:
437:
436:
435:
434:
427:
423:
420:
416:
413:
408:
404:
399:
398:
396:
392:
387:
386:
385:
384:
376:
372:
369:
365:
363:
362:very explicit
359:
355:
349:
346:
343:
340:
337:
301:
297:
293:
290:
286:
283:
277:
276:
271:
268:
264:
260:
257:
253:
250:
247:
227:
223:
219:
216:
213:
208:
199:
196:
193:
190:
186:
183:
180:
177:
172:
167:
164:
160:
156:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
135:
130:
126:
124:
118:
113:
112:
111:
110:
104:
102:
99:
96:
60:
59:
58:
57:
52:
51:
49:
43:
42:
36:
33:
25:
19:
549:
548:
503:
499:
489:
479:
474:Adolf Hitler
471:
466:
460:Haham hanuka
448:
432:
431:
414:
403:Tony Sidaway
391:Tony Sidaway
382:
380:
375:Haham hanuka
361:
358:pornographic
351:
347:
274:
251:
222:Haham hanuka
217:
197:
184:
170:
150:
122:
108:
107:
61:
55:
53:
48:Haham hanuka
45:
44:
40:
39:
35:Haham hanuka
256:Linuxbeak
134:Carbonite
567:Category
465:but you
433:Comments
467:already
415:Neutral
383:Neutral
198:Oppose.
159:Zzyzx11
56:Support
520:Korath
426:Bjarki
348:Oppose
289:Jondel
185:Oppose
171:please
109:Oppose
555:Eranb
550:again
300:Danny
296:Eranb
275:Andre
226:Lst27
206:Fresh
16:<
524:Talk
502:ask
480:what
407:Talk
395:Talk
368:IZAK
298:and
281:talk
267:jguk
203:Oven
163:Talk
138:Talk
504:you
484:dab
443:dab
419:Rje
342:(c)
339:(t)
189:Mgm
117:dab
101:(c)
98:(t)
569::
500:us
458:--
401:--
373:--
265:,
201:✏
161:|
136:|
538:দ
522:(
511:দ
492:)
490:ᛏ
488:(
451:)
449:ᛏ
447:(
405:|
393:|
335:n
332:a
329:i
326:g
323:n
320:i
317:v
314:o
311:r
308:e
305:M
278:(
245:)
242:k
239:l
236:a
233:t
230:(
211:²
191:|
179:দ
125:)
123:ᛏ
121:(
94:n
91:a
88:i
85:g
82:n
79:i
76:v
73:o
70:r
67:e
64:M
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.