792:. I'm glad that you like Knowledge, but please understand that adminship is something that is granted to editors that the community trusts have the knowledge and good judgement to enforce Knowledge's policies. Given your short list of contributions, you just don't have enough of a track record to demonstrate those qualities at this time. I'm also concerned by the warning you have on your talk page ("DO NOT: Add useless junk to my talk page, I am NOT an administrator, though I know some and if I find that you have, I will have you temporarily blocked. Thank you!"), which suggests that you are unfamiliar with
845:
the article talk pages would also be good. I just noticed that at least half of your total edits so far are to your userpage, when they ideally should be elsewhere. Once you get a feel for how the article or mainspace works, then perhaps you could branch out into the policy pages, such as deletion discussions. Learning about vandalism and how to counter it would also be helpful. I really hope this advice helps! --
844:
a fine one to say this, with my 366 edits to my userpage to date (out of 3840 total edits), but I would strongly suggest that you avoid editing your userpage for now and concentrate more around articles... either writing them from scratch, or improving existing ones. Giving feedback or suggestions on
280:
We have to stop thinking of adminship as a trophy. Even with a 300 edits edit count this user hasent vandalised. He has done some controvesial uploading but that is not revelent to RFAs because adminship only allows admins to delete them. Therefore, the likeliness of vandalization with the tools. How
624:
and contributing to XfD discussions where you can demonstrate a knowledge of policies and guidelines for starters. Do this and return in a year-or-so, or perhaps another editor will notice your contributions in addition to your encyclopedic edits and nominate you. Please withdraw this nomination
758:
Professional
Electronic Engineer, Professional Musician, Librarian, Professional Graphic Designer, Professional Editor, a Geoscientist, a Pilot, a Psychotherapist, Systems Analyst, and Webmaster? Forgive me for doubting, but it seems you do not take Knowledge seriously at all. You will need to
757:
Usually I wouldn't do this when it is unnecessary, but I am opposing due to evidence of probable sock-puppetry and your user page, which seems like a playing ground for putting as many userboxes as possible. You speak 10+ languages at an intermediate or better language? And you are a
Chemist,
779:
simply not enough experience for me, 13 Wikispace edits? Continue editing productively, show some understanding of policies (e.g. XfDs), create a more convincing self-nom, or, better still, find someone to nominate you for your good work, and we'll meet here again.
816:. In this case, I would direct you towards the "fair use" clause. I don't want to discourage you, but you simply need more time and experience with Knowledge to realistically consider becoming an admin. And remember, many people will tell you that
503:
That's one thing that makes the world such an interesting place - different people think differently about many things, and there isn't necessarily a "right" and "wrong" in what and how they think. Or, as someone wise has said, YMMV. --
70:. With so many oppose votes this early on and with so few edits to this user's history there is little likelihood of achieving consensus at this moment in time. Detailed comments will be left on the editor's Talk page.
190:
I have had a few minor scirmishes with some other editors, but for the most part no. I always tried to maintain a pleasant demeanor and I am sure that I always thouroughly wrote everything out, and I will continue to do
229:
Hi; I hate to sound rude, but people might pile-on the oppose votes because of inexperience. If you start to see this, I recommend withdrawing and returning to RfA at a later date. Keep up the good editing though! —
170:. I am most pleased with this article because I wrote it with, what I believe, to be great aplomb. I started it the moment that I finished reading the series and I realized that it was great enough to have a
146:. I'd also like to help with speedy deletions and proposed deletions, and in taking care of the image deletion backlogs. Mostly, I'd like the admin tools so that I could further the care and maintenance of
301:
Two users have called this user irrational and not something to expect from a non-newbie on
Knowledge. I stand by my vote. Please do not contact me from shock of seeing a non-newbie vote like this.--
266:. You just don't have enough edits here to require admin tools at the present. Keep editing articles and wikipedia sections, get some more experience, and I will happily support you at a later date.
645:
comments above. It also appears that you need significantly more edits in general, please take the next several months to make many more edits that will show what a great editor you can be!
603:
per above comments. It shows that you lack experience and understanding of how
Knowledge truly works, so I recommend seeking adoption from another user and come back in 3-4 months. —
690:- no where near enough edits yet. However, if this user continues to work in the same way over the next few months, then would be a perfect nominee when they have 1500+ edits.
113:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve
Knowledge in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
589:"DO NOT: Add useless junk to my talk page, I am NOT an administrator, though I know some and if I find that you have, I will have you temporarily blocked. Thank you! :)
184:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
1026:
1008:
212:
463:: per nearly non-existent answers to questions; no nominating statement; voted for self; incorrectly created nomination; 317 edits; need I go on? And
950:
133:
820:. I suggest that you keep contributing to Knowledge, become more familiar with its policies, and maybe someday you might become an admin. --
620:
Zero admin-related task edits can be found in your 317 contributions to-date. Try reverting vandalism, warning vandals, reporting them to
254:
You are going to need a lot more experience for this RfA to succeed, however, from your position so far, I will give this moral support.
903:
30:
17:
125:
884:
Sorry man, but your edit count is insufficient, your edit summary usage is abysmal, and you got little admin task experience.
944:
89:
898:
311:
291:
121:
208:
793:
160:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
642:
626:
510:
167:
129:
71:
916:
Only 315 total edits, barely any kind of answers, let alone good ones...sorry, but you're just not ready yet.
893:
805:
801:
400:
939:
797:
853:
828:
781:
738:
494:
I know why they do it, I just don't understand it. I would find it insulting if it was my nomination. —
1007:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
872:
331:
143:
846:
821:
767:
679:
608:
506:
485:
235:
984:
968:
954:
929:
908:
876:
860:
835:
784:
771:
749:
723:
707:
682:
666:
649:
629:
612:
595:
573:
564:
555:
542:
522:
513:
498:
489:
471:
455:
421:
382:
365:
334:
316:
296:
270:
258:
239:
93:
74:
937:
Not enough experience, and other concerns voiced above (userbox claims, etc.) are also relevant.
885:
591:"). If that reflects his understanding of blocking policy, he's obviously not suited to the job.
347:
204:
79:
977:
716:
661:
548:
452:
416:
395:
377:
923:
743:
352:
83:
701:
646:
307:
287:
100:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept this nomination. :)
963:
817:
809:
763:
675:
638:
605:
592:
570:
519:
495:
482:
477:
468:
255:
232:
67:
63:
731:
Multiple evidence of unsuitability as per above. I strongly suggest self-withdrawal.--
1020:
813:
621:
658:
411:
372:
362:
918:
733:
267:
812:, which I seriously doubt is true. Copyright violation is a serious breach of
692:
561:
539:
327:
302:
282:
1001:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
174:
article, and when I saw that there wasn't one, well I just had to create it.
171:
147:
762:
change your behavior on
Knowledge for me to support in the future. --
166:
I think that the article that I am most pleased aboutwould have to be
1011:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
120:
What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out
587:
per recent block, silly threatening messagebox on his talk page (
480:. Although I'm not a fan of it, I can understand the need. —
281:
could a user with a good record start misusing sysop tools.--
976:, please come after having more experience on Knowledge.
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
476:
Most people vote "moral support" as a means to avoiding
448:
444:
361:
I don't think you're allowed to vote for yourself.--
142:
I want to help clear up the backlogs; especially at
870:. You are a good editor, but need more experience.
796:. Please also refrain from uploading images like
393:I support this user as an administrator nominee.
538:- insufficient experience, suggest withdraw. --
435:Please keep criticism constructive and polite.
58:(2/21/0); ended 23:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
8:
854:
847:
829:
822:
715:obviously not qualified. Please withdraw. -
547:Perhaps you have misplaced your vote? :) -
467:people, quit it with the "moral support". —
346:I support this as nominator and nominee.
808:and claiming that they fall under the
7:
92:) - Hopefully a good editor. Zazzer
1027:Unsuccessful requests for adminship
24:
66:and close this RfA early, as per
18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
126:Category:Administrative backlog
938:
904:
886:
810:GNU Free Documentation License
518:Couldn't have said it better.
211:. For the edit count, see the
1:
985:22:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
978:
969:21:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
955:21:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
930:20:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
924:
909:20:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
899:
877:20:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
861:19:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
836:18:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
785:18:29, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
772:16:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
750:15:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
724:14:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
717:
708:14:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
683:14:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
674:and suggest withdrawl before
667:14:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
650:14:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
630:14:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
613:14:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
596:14:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
574:21:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
565:21:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
556:14:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
549:
543:13:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
523:21:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
514:15:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
499:14:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
490:13:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
472:13:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
456:12:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
422:13:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
396:
383:13:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
366:13:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
335:14:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
317:21:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
297:13:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
271:11:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
259:01:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
240:12:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
75:23:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
947:
919:
894:
814:Knowledge's image use policy
401:
353:
134:administrators' reading list
94:00:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
889:
794:Knowledge's blocking policy
348:
207:'s edit summary usage with
109:Questions for the candidate
1043:
962:, not enough experience.--
128:, and read the page about
122:Category:Knowledge backlog
818:adminship is not a trophy
168:The Serpent's Egg Trilogy
1004:Please do not modify it.
840:A few more suggestions:
40:Please do not modify it.
806:Image:Twisted Blade.jpg
802:Image:Burning Crown.gif
798:Image:Serpents Egg.jpg
657:per all the above. --
357:06:54 February 7 2007
31:request for adminship
478:biting the newcomers
941:~ Kathryn NicDhàna
748:
732:
706:
664:
443:: per canvassing
410:
371:
315:
295:
1034:
1006:
982:
966:
953:
949:
942:
926:
921:
906:
901:
896:
891:
888:
858:
851:
833:
826:
782:The Rambling Man
746:
741:
736:
721:
704:
700:
697:
696:
663:(request backup)
662:
643:(aeropagitica)'s
553:
509:
419:
414:
409:
403:
398:
380:
375:
370:
355:
350:
305:
285:
198:General comments
42:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1009:this nomination
1002:
964:
940:
744:
739:
734:
702:
694:
693:
505:
417:
412:
378:
373:
144:requested moves
52:
38:
35:did not succeed
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1040:
1038:
1030:
1029:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1013:
997:
996:
988:
987:
971:
957:
932:
911:
879:
865:
864:
863:
787:
774:
752:
726:
710:
685:
680:After Midnight
669:
652:
632:
627:(aeropagitica)
615:
598:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
507:John Broughton
458:
427:
426:
425:
424:
406:
405:
386:
385:
368:
338:
337:
321:
320:
319:
274:
273:
261:
243:
242:
222:
220:
219:
218:
216:
209:mathbot's tool
200:
199:
195:
194:
193:
192:
178:
177:
176:
175:
154:
153:
152:
151:
130:administrators
111:
110:
105:
103:
102:
72:(aeropagitica)
51:
46:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1039:
1028:
1025:
1024:
1022:
1012:
1010:
1005:
999:
998:
995:
994:
993:
992:
986:
983:
981:
975:
972:
970:
967:
961:
958:
956:
952:
946:
943:
936:
933:
931:
928:
927:
922:
915:
912:
910:
907:
902:
897:
892:
883:
880:
878:
875:
874:
869:
866:
862:
859:
857:
852:
850:
843:
839:
838:
837:
834:
832:
827:
825:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
788:
786:
783:
778:
775:
773:
769:
765:
761:
756:
753:
751:
747:
742:
737:
730:
727:
725:
722:
720:
714:
711:
709:
705:
699:
698:
689:
686:
684:
681:
677:
673:
670:
668:
665:
660:
656:
653:
651:
648:
644:
640:
636:
633:
631:
628:
623:
619:
616:
614:
611:
610:
607:
602:
599:
597:
594:
590:
586:
583:
575:
572:
568:
567:
566:
563:
559:
558:
557:
554:
552:
546:
545:
544:
541:
537:
536:Moral Support
534:
524:
521:
517:
516:
515:
512:
508:
502:
501:
500:
497:
493:
492:
491:
488:
487:
484:
479:
475:
474:
473:
470:
466:
462:
459:
457:
454:
450:
446:
442:
439:
438:
437:
436:
432:
431:
423:
420:
415:
408:
407:
404:
399:
394:
392:
388:
387:
384:
381:
376:
369:
367:
364:
360:
359:
358:
356:
351:
345:
340:
339:
336:
333:
329:
325:
322:
318:
313:
309:
304:
300:
299:
298:
293:
289:
284:
279:
276:
275:
272:
269:
265:
264:Moral Support
262:
260:
257:
253:
252:Moral Support
250:
249:
248:
247:
241:
238:
237:
234:
228:
227:
226:
225:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
201:
197:
196:
189:
186:
185:
183:
180:
179:
173:
169:
165:
162:
161:
159:
156:
155:
149:
145:
141:
138:
137:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
116:
115:
114:
108:
107:
106:
101:
98:
97:
96:
95:
91:
88:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
69:
65:
62:I'm going to
60:
59:
56:
50:
47:
43:
41:
36:
32:
27:
26:
19:
1003:
1000:
990:
989:
979:
973:
959:
934:
917:
913:
881:
871:
867:
855:
848:
841:
830:
823:
789:
776:
759:
754:
728:
718:
712:
691:
687:
671:
654:
634:
617:
604:
600:
588:
584:
550:
535:
481:
464:
460:
453:David Mestel
440:
434:
433:
429:
428:
390:
389:
343:
342:
323:
277:
263:
251:
245:
244:
231:
223:
221:
187:
181:
163:
157:
139:
117:
112:
104:
99:
86:
78:
61:
57:
54:
53:
48:
39:
34:
28:
760:drastically
639:Sandstein's
873:Yuser31415
647:Whereizben
332:Hendry1307
224:Discussion
965:Wizardman
593:Sandstein
571:Alex43223
520:Alex43223
496:Doug Bell
469:Doug Bell
344:Support.'
308:Talk Page
288:Talk Page
256:Alex43223
213:talk page
172:Knowledge
148:Knowledge
1021:Category
413:=Nichalp
402:McCoffee
391:Support.
374:=Nichalp
312:Contribs
292:Contribs
132:and the
90:contribs
991:Neutral
905:veritas
887:Captain
764:Renesis
676:WP:SNOW
659:Deskana
606:Deckill
483:Deckill
418:«Talk»=
379:«Talk»=
363:Newport
324:Support
278:Support
246:Support
233:Deckill
68:WP:SNOW
64:be bold
974:Oppose
960:Oppose
935:Oppose
914:Oppose
882:Oppose
868:Oppose
804:, and
790:Oppose
777:Oppose
755:Oppose
729:Oppose
713:Oppose
695:Asics
688:Oppose
672:Oppose
655:Oppose
635:Oppose
625:soon.
622:WP:AIV
618:Oppose
601:Oppose
585:Oppose
560:No. --
465:please
461:Oppose
441:Oppose
430:Oppose
268:Jeffpw
205:Zazzer
80:Zazzer
49:Zazzer
980:Shyam
890:panda
703:talk
562:BigDT
540:BigDT
328:Natl1
303:Natl1
283:Natl1
55:Final
33:that
16:<
900:vino
849:Kyok
824:Kyok
768:talk
719:Anas
678:. --
641:and
637:per
551:Anas
511:(♫♫)
449:here
447:and
445:here
326:per
203:See
124:and
84:talk
925:fon
920:Gan
842:I'm
735:Hús
569:...
397:Joe
354:zer
349:Zaz
310:) (
290:) (
191:so.
1023::
895:In
800:,
770:)
745:nd
609:er
486:er
451:.
330:.
236:er
188:A:
182:3.
164:A:
158:2.
140:A:
136:.
118:1.
37:.
951:♫
948:♦
945:♫
856:o
831:o
766:(
740:ö
341:'
314:)
306:(
294:)
286:(
215:.
150:.
87:·
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.