658:, however it opens the question what led him to block. Having God in the name will often lead to a block but godwin is an appropriate name. There are many other blocks that were questionable. After every occasion, betacommand has generally re-started the questionable behavior until threatneed with a block again. I have asked him nicley what is going on before and got a nice answer however the actions did not stop. I belive that any administrator willing to block without personal review or just block a name because it contains the substring of a possible offensive term is more of a detrmiment to this project than any innapropriate name that spends an extra 20 minutes around because it is blocked manually. 1 instance would be ok, 2 instances would be ok. There are multiple instance where this editor/administrator has abused there power and I have serious concerns about what will hapen in the future. Other things that will hurt this project is automated removal of content, and testing bots/script debugging on live articles. This may have been addressed but his willingngess to use the project as a sandbox for his development is also innparopriate. If even a fraction of the over 3,000 link removals were eroneous or left mistakes, it would take a significant amount of time to go behing and clean it up. And, in fact, many of those edits were erroneous and his talk page at one time had 10+ complaints regarding these actions. The next day, the actions started again. I have never once heard him admit that what he was doing is wrong, however justified it every time. I think it is important, especially for an administrator, to admit when they may have made a mistake. I do not think there is anything preventing betacommand from developing a a new script that will leave a wake of disaster and forcing the rest of the project to cleanup the mess. There are certain sites that should be removed, blind removal by a poorly developed tool at bot like speeds is innapropriate. There is a reason there is a bot approval process.
596:*: 14:43, 8 March 2007 Betacommand (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "59.167.13.50 (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week (spamming) *: 14:43, 8 March 2007 Betacommand (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "202.58.63.200 (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week (spamming) *: 14:43, 8 March 2007 Betacommand (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "208.109.49.47 (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week (spamming) *: 14:43, 8 March 2007 Betacommand (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "59.167.243.12 (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week (spamming) *: 14:43, 8 March 2007 Betacommand (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "121.44.236.252 (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week (spamming) *: 14:43, 8 March 2007 Betacommand (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "210.11.241.21 (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week (spamming) *: 14:43, 8 March 2007 Betacommand (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Tuddy (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (spamming) *: 14:43, 8 March 2007 Betacommand (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Voyages (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (spamming) *: 14:43, 8 March 2007 Betacommand (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Svm-en (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (spamming)
778:
war about the tag. Since I did not protect the page, (I hoped valid edits could continue) on the talk page I left a note saying that continued revert warring would get the person blocked. Less than 24 hours later a user removes the template. Seeing this as a continuation of the edit conflict I blocked the user in question for 24 hours. I was attempting to contain the revert war and promote discussion. I see now that how I handled the issue was a mistake. I should have left the page the way I found it and full protected it and filed a RFC on the issue. I have not looked too deep into this dispute. On
Hindsight I should have done a more through examination of the issue before acting. I attempted to step in a stop the edit war without enough information. That was a mistake and I don’t plan on that happening again. I am sorry for how I handled the issue, and should have been more careful of my actions. As what appeared to happen here was that I was using admin tools in an edit dispute. That was not my intent, and I shall be very careful in the future to avoid the appearance of admin tool abuse, and I shall be very careful in the future to avoid similar problems again.
440:, but everyone makes mistakes. I'm concerned with a long history of disregard for other users (see above and below). I'm concerned with 3 major (look at the people involved in each!) AN/I incidents in 6 days, without a single "I understand", "I was wrong", or "I won't do it again". I'm not interested in punishing him for what he did, that can be fixed, or has been fixed. I'm concerned with preventing the next one. --
1114:
administrative actions. Such expected communication includes: giving appropriate (as guided by
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines) warnings prior to, and notification messages following, their actions; using accurate and descriptive edit and administrative action summaries; and responding promptly and fully to all good-faith concerns raised about their administrative actions.
733:, I gave several hours for comment by the community and closed only the ones with a clear consensus to allow. I did not unblock any users without requesting the communitys input, and only proceeded when I was sure that the community wanted said users unblocked. My concerns of acting without community consensus are the reason for my ANI posting, and I was actually
1128:
Knowledge (XXG), and if there could be any reasonable doubt about whether a block is appropriate, other administrators and/or the community should be consulted. Following a block, the blocked editor should be notified of the block on their talk page, and additional notification on site may be appropriate to seek community input.
394:, a US government agency, apparently based on a third party article about spam links in Google. He claimed on AN/I he was doing this without the aid of a bot. Given two similar incidents in three days, and the fact that removal of Bot rights didn't seem to help, several people discussed a community ban. Instead, I made a
370:
The first incident, on March 21, had
Betacommand apparently using a computerized tool from his own account to remove links to usenet groups across hundreds of articles, without discussion. His edit speeds have been estimated at 30 edits per minute. Many editors quickly showed up at his user talk page
751:
Ok in regard to username blocks I have almost completely stopped issuing those, and with hindsight I should not have blocked as many borderline users as I did. In the rare cases where I do issue them now they are for obvious reasons. Removing mass external links was inappropriate and should not have
661:
In summary, betacommand has shown repeated abuse of administrator tools over a period of time including blocking and deleting as well as abuse of Bot policies. If it were n isolated incident, i would be more likley to drop it but these incidents have occured over time which leads me to believe that
460:
As my response to ChrisO above, and as
Chrislk02's clarification why arbitration is still necessary, and Comment by Chacor below. The individual issues are all or mostly settled, the problem is that they just keep on coming. I'm not even talking about dredging up stuff from November or December. The
398:
that he roll back his controversial edits, and promise not to go on any mass deletion sprees without discussion beforehand, or approval by another experienced editor. He rolled back his edits, but did not agree to the last condition. He also did not apologize, accept that his actions were wrong, or
375:
and the following 3 sections.) He stopped after I posted on his talk page emphasizing I was an admin and this was an official warning; I was ready to block him if he didn't stop to discuss, and made an "emergency" post on AN/I asking for review of the impending block. In the face of extensive later
1680:
identifying "doorway domains" for spam. The rapid removal of external links raised concerns that
Betacommand was using an unauthorized automated tool on his main account, and also that he was removing links so rapidly that he did not have, or take, time enough to determine if the links were valid.
777:
tag. Not thinking that protecting the page made since the whole conflict was over a template, I added the template back (I assumed in good faith that the tag was valid) and left a note on the talk page warning the involved parties that they needed to solve the issue on the talk page and not revert
465:
is another big todo, Feb 27-28, less than a month before. Chris's list of incidents below fills in the spaces between that. :-(. I'm not asking for a ban, but we need something, maybe probation, maybe a formal reprimand, maybe a temporary desysop, but something with teeth. Each time people assume
1127:
8.1) Blocking is a serious matter. Administrators should be exceedingly careful when blocking. Blocks should be made only if other means are not likely to be effective; prior discussion or warnings should generally precede all blocks. Blocks should be used only to prevent damage or disruption to
1113:
7) Due to the collaborative nature of
Knowledge (XXG), proper communication is extremely important, and all editors are expected to respond to messages intended for them in a timely manner and to constructively discuss controversial issues. This is especially true for administrators in regard to
686:
As a further clarification, I believe that this request for arbitration is still necessary as an review of his behavior and for a final ruling. He has got many "Dont do it agains," which have gone unheeded. While I feel an immediate de-sysop is innapropriate, I feel that this should be a last,
671:
As a further clarification, i respect
Betacommands contributions to this community. I have no vendetta against him and would actually not like to see him immediatly de-sysopped. My concerns posted here are only for what I feel are actions that have and, should similar actions be repeated,
402:
The third incident is today, March 26. He has apparently blocked a user for participation in a content dispute. After mass criticism on AN/I by many admins, he unblocked the user, without admitting that he was wrong. That same page, today, uncovered issues with apparently
346:) is an administrator and expert coder of bots and tools. Unfortunately, he has a long history of controversial use of both bots and admin tools (the RFC above is related). I was only made aware of him in the last week, and in that time he has shown up three times on the
501:
With regard to this RfArb, I can only add that, like many editors, I've watched a series of problems arise because of
Betacommand's inappropriate use of bots and now blocks, and it seems to a large proportion of the many admins and other editors commenting on him at
649:
I think all of these actions, plus several other pas actions which I have not summarized here (his block log includes 3 blocks for unatuirhorized bots). There are also several other username blocks that many users have expressed concern over. usernames such as
417:
seems to be that these recurring issues demand further action, and that
Betacommand has lost the community's trust as an admin. If the community noticeboard could take intermediate steps besides outright ban, I'd take it there. As far as I understand, it can't.
42:
Please do not edit this page directly unless you wish to become a participant in this case. (All participants are subject to
Arbitration Committee decisions, and the ArbCom will consider each participant's role in the dispute.) Comments are very welcome on the
1061:
Additionally, editors may use scripts to assist in performing repetitive edits. Generally, scripts require manual confirmation of each edit. Unsupervised and supervised automatic bots require approval of the BAG. Manually assisted bots and scripts
811:
The first incident, on March 21, had Betacommand apparently using a computerized tool from his own account to remove links to usenet groups across hundreds of articles, without discussion. His edit speeds have been estimated at 30 edits per minute.
903:
problems–some addressed by the community, some not, but none beyond the community's grasp. People of good judgement disagree on many of issues raised here–does the community want to sacrifice its judgement on these questions? Ceremonial reject.
863:
I'm on the fence, per ChrisO's and El C's comments. I myself have blocked at high speed before, usually after a checkuser run. As I understand it Betacommand's BAG privileges are under review, and I should think he's got the message by now.
422:. Betacommand is a well-meaning user, and a skilled bot developer, who has the community effect of a porcupine in a nudist colony. Hopefully some kind of intermediate action besides outright ban will be enough to de-quill him. --
389:
The second incident, on March 23, he again used a computer assisted tool, no longer at 30, but still at 5 to 15 edits per minute, removing other external links across unrelated articles, including to the official site of
506:
that it's inappropriate that he should continue to be trusted with admin tools. It may be that he simply needs more experience before being allowed them, it may be that he's temperamentally unsuited — I don't know.
1020:
are trusted members of the community and are expected to follow Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Occasional lapses of judgment are tolerated, but consistently poor judgment may result in de-sysopping.
999:
59:
184:
292:
129:
631:
23 Mar 2007 13:16 - 17:37 -Fairly rapid remval of abou 200 (appprox) external links in a similar manner as objeted to on the previous ani post. This action stopped when he was warned of a block again.
238:
752:
happened, as I said on the ANI post I shall seek consensus before removing any external links in the future. The bot operator issue as been solved, the scope and exact task are being reviewed by
462:
404:
395:
364:
359:
354:
2040:). Betacommand was generally unresponsive to the above editors, ignoring many, giving curt replies to others and generally failing to adequately address the editorial concerns being raised.
529:
Here is a recent timeline of suspicious, controversial and possible innapropriate actions by betacommand many that I have been involved with, witnessed and or confronted betacommand about.
55:
48:
1238:
899:
Flip-flopping again. Are there open unresolved problems related of recent date? I'm not convinced that the attention of the arbitration committee is required here. I see many different
376:
criticism, mostly on AN/I, he rolled back most or all of his edits. I was happy with that, thought that would be the end of it, and even thanked him for doing so the next day I edited.
1079:
4) An editor who misuses automated editing tools such as bots and scripts, or fails to respond appropriately to concerns about their use, may lose the privilege of using such tools.
44:
1634:
10) Beginning on 20 March 2007, Betacommand engaged in high-speed removal of external links. From 22:38, 20 March, through 4:35, 21 March (UTC), he removed 418 external links (
1699:
687:"Dont do it again" that is endorsed by the community and the arbitration commitee. The many message left at ANI and on his talk page have apparently been left in vain.
2114:), saying that the template additions were valid, and the editor should not have been blocked. The editor, subsequently unblocked by Betacommand, has not edited since.
419:
1092:
5) Admins should not run bots on their sysop account that are enabled to perform sysop actions (blocking, deleting, etc) without specific community approval from
1565:), giving as reason on his talk page, "Im getting tired of being bitched at for no reason. thus I am reporting VERY block to make sure the bitching stops ..." (
1511:
1388:). The only apparent direct responses Betacommand made to queries on his talk page were to answer technical queries about how the deletions were accomplished (
322:
691:
1599:
1544:
1537:
2075:
1543:
8) After complaints about his username blocks on 18 February 2007 and following, Betacommand began using an automated tool that made numerous reports at
2134:). Betacommand failed to notify Irpen (or anyone) about the block, and made no comment about the block, on Knowledge (XXG), until nearly a day later (
981:
963:
954:
938:
929:
871:
857:
536:, and following logs. Started deleting images upwards of 20 per minute for a time period deleting updwards of 500 images over a short period of time.
1259:
2.1) Betacommand's image deletions were conducted inappropriately and showed poor judgment because he used an inappropriate methodology of deleting
543:
is blocked and then unblocked for running an unauthorized deletion bot. The unblock comment states, "(I don't think he is going to do that again) "
466:
he's learned and it won't happen again, but the issues just keep coming. Like a bull in a china shop, every time he turns there's a loud crash. --
2525:
1093:
1267:
1162:
798:"Assisted bots are defined as any software that allows rapid editing of articles, while not saving any changes without some human interaction."
384:
380:
1722:
355:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive218#Emergency: Betacommand deletion at bot speeds - please review impending block
70:
17:
1421:. For example, in February 2007, from 15:52, 1 February through 23:05, 27 February (UTC), Betacommand blocked approximately 1,000 editors (
2069:
2505:
4) Betacommand's administrative privileges are revoked. He may reapply at any time via the usual means or by appeal to this committee.
343:
148:
1605:), on 28 February 2007 and continuing through 2 March, Betacommand began to report large numbers of obvious username violations at
1035:
256:
93:
58:. That page may also be used for general comments on the evidence. Arbitrators will then vote on a final decision in the case at
2193:
2179:
1711:
1500:). One of the few direct responses Betacommand made to queries on his talk page was a short and incomplete reply to a query by
309:
202:
160:
2108:" to various pages, Betacommand, with no prior warning, blocked the editor for vandalism and reverted all the editor's edits (
1774:
12) Betacommand's removal of external links was conducted inappropriately and showed poor judgment for the following reasons:
741:
2264:
2247:
2233:
that "If a user removes the Noteability tag before this discusion above is concluded I will block them for edit waring." (
1657:
1173:
372:
268:
178:
166:
105:
2299:
2207:
1674:
1665:
1525:
1522:
1519:
1434:
1431:
1428:
1146:
1) On 27 November 2006, from 17:52 to 19:43 (UTC), Betacommand used an unauthorized automated tool to delete 1,590 images (
635:
625:
286:
274:
214:
154:
123:
111:
555:
an administror expresses concerns of betacommands blocking and denying of unblock requests in relation to a usernameblock
977:
262:
232:
220:
172:
99:
1440:
1418:
2128:
2093:
701:
I at no point claimed that the username blocks by betacommand were current, merely having occured since the originial
280:
208:
117:
1168:
tags or talk page disputes concerning whether fair use deletion criteria applied. These deletions were criticized at
480:
Ah, history slipping in here a little. I suggest that you look at the facts of the matter, including my message at
1202:
854:
621:
a series of 3,000 external link removals at bot like speeds with many more per hour than humanly possible at times.
226:
1838:
links were removed indiscriminately without checking to see whether some of the links were appropriate in context.
371:
to complain; his responses were minimal, curt, or entirely lacking, and the deletion went on at high speeds. (See
360:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive218#Betacommand AGAIN - this time.2C ext. link removals
2081:
820:, human assisted bots have no policy grounds for any action taken against them, if they are human assisted bots.
1214:
1181:
642:
2057:
21 October: Betacommand's first block came 34 minutes after being made an administrator. After noticing that
1718:
1158:). He apparently indiscriminately deleted every image which was tagged for speedy delete, with no regard for
2063:
1480:
1460:
1232:
1220:
713:. And, actually after realizing that Mel's block of betacommand was possibly due to my poor communication,
582:
a thread where I expressed my concerns over blocking habits, point violations and other concerns I have had.
1821:
links to web sites listed as having a "spam percentage" above a certain percent, according to a "study" by
911:
889:
830:
782:
676:
666:
518:
495:
470:
444:
426:
2412:), caused many instances of loss of desired bolding, for example in the first occurrence of a page title (
2105:
1208:
561:
in his contribs where he pretty much started auto reporting all usernames that had been blocked before to
1319:
717:
and attemplted to clarify myself and expressed concerns that I felt the block was innapropriate and that
2152:
2058:
1968:
1853:
1653:
1494:
1456:
1382:
1287:
1226:
1169:
960:
950:
926:
850:
337:
142:
592:
8 Mar 2007 - A series of 9 blocks in 1 minute, very improabbly all were done manual with proper review.
484:
in which I explained the mistake behind my block, and asked if people thought that I should unblock. --
436:
I'm actually not that interested in considering the incidents separately; separately they're each, not
54:
Arbitrators, the parties, and other editors may suggest proposed principles, findings, and remedies at
1729:
1518:; Betacommand did not participate in the RFC, and participated only minimally in the ANI discussions (
1437:
651:
2477:
1368:
512:
489:
250:
87:
1822:
463:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive208#Trigger-happy_blocking_by_Betacommand
2187:
2173:
2117:
21 December: Without warning or prior discussion, Betacommand blocked long-time established editor
2015:
1778:
he used an automated tool to edit with bot-like speed from an account that did not have a bot flag;
1755:
1184:
945:
908:
886:
868:
771:
757:
455:
303:
196:
1510:. There were four general discussions which included discussion of Betacommand's username blocks:
2258:
2241:
2210:
2159:
2034:
1997:
2202:). Betacommand failed to notify either editor about the blocks. These blocks were criticized at
1017:
365:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive220#Betacommand questionable blocking
1986:
1961:
1891:
1312:
461:
3 incidents from my statement were in the last 6 consecutive days. From Bishonen's statement:
2138:
702:
655:
562:
503:
481:
2428:
2324:
1979:
1930:
973:
923:
779:
333:
137:
2343:
2320:
2271:
2203:
2145:
1694:
11) Many links were removed inappropriately. For example, Betacommand classified as "spam"
1661:
1606:
1592:
1515:
1395:
1177:
1097:
817:
793:
753:
566:
347:
2295:
2283:
2122:
2008:
1993:
1972:
1923:
1898:
1887:
807:
508:
485:
467:
441:
423:
408:
245:
82:
69:
as needed, but closed cases should not be edited otherwise. Please raise any questions at
1826:
1677:
2315:
15) Several past incidents demonstrate that Betacommand has a history of poor judgment:
47:, and will be read, in full. Evidence, no matter who can provide it, is very welcome at
2291:
2230:
2183:
2169:
2027:
1865:
1744:
1733:
1493:). Betacommand made no apparent direct response to any of the above editors, either at
1473:
1347:
1196:
905:
883:
865:
827:
738:
688:
673:
663:
299:
191:
2484:
2471:
2468:
2465:
2462:
2459:
2456:
2453:
2441:
2438:
2356:
2353:
2350:
2337:
2334:
2331:
2112:
2038:
2031:
2012:
2001:
1990:
1983:
1976:
1965:
1950:
1927:
1920:
1909:
1902:
1895:
1880:
1869:
1637:); from 14:16, 21 March through 17:34 (UTC), he further removed 2,121 external links (
1603:
1551:
1491:
1484:
1477:
1470:
1467:
1464:
1425:
1389:
1381:). Betacommand made no apparent direct response to any of the above editors either at
1379:
1372:
1365:
1358:
1351:
1344:
1337:
1330:
1323:
1316:
1309:
1302:
1295:
586:
580:
573:
553:
547:
2519:
2254:
2237:
2023:
1942:
1938:
1916:
1883:
1857:
1740:
1501:
1455:
7) A number of editors expressed concerns regarding Betacommand's username blocks at
1375:
1354:
1333:
1286:
3) A number of editors expressed concerns regarding Betacommand's image deletions on
1034:
3) Various tools exist to partially or fully automate repetitive editing tasks. The
935:
1852:
13) A number of editors expressed concerns regarding Betacommand's link removals at
1670:
On 23 March, from 13:15 through 15:29 (UTC), Betacomand removed 104 external links (
1569:
1361:
1340:
1273:
tags or talk page disputes concerning whether fair use deletion criteria applied.
767:
issue I made a mistake. I attempted to stop what I thought was an edit war over a
1394:). Betacommand's only other apparent comments on the image deletions were two on
576:. Situation where betacommand made a point, only sees things in black and white.
2279:
2019:
1946:
1861:
1487:
969:
796:, it clearly states that a bot account is not required. I quote from the policy
1051:- User runs a bot and watches the edits, but does not have to interact directly
2287:
2275:
2118:
2004:
1934:
1912:
1905:
1876:
1872:
1576:
1417:
4) Betacommand has blocked large numbers of editors for alleged violations of
1326:
1305:
1298:
1291:
849:
Code is law, thus bot writers have a particular obligation to the community.
645:
regarding innapropriate block of a user editing an article he was engaged in.
2223:
1957:
1953:
1191:
764:
411:
apparently blocked Betacommand for this, or a combination of these actions.
399:
promise not to repeat them, stating merely that he was debugging his tool.
1424:). These blocks have attracted numerous complaints on multiple occasions (
1572:
with a block summary: "refuses to stop bot reporting with this account" (
420:
Apparently stewards won't desysop someone without an arbcom ruling either
2111:). These actions drew the immediate complaints of two administrators (
2053:
14) Betacommand has a history of inappropriate blocks. These include:
1652:). Beginning at 13:16, 21 March, the link removals were criticized at
1243:
with a block summary of "I don't think he is going to do that again" (
1066:
require approval if the editor anticipates making high-speed edits.
1439:). A number of Betacommand's username blocks have been overturned (
565:
in what was believed to be to make a point. This was mentioned at
71:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration#Requests for clarification
2222:
26 March: Betacommand reverted the removal of a notability tag at
662:
betacommand should not be entrusted with the administrators tools.
391:
756:. And to make a clarification I have never abused my bot account
589:
in regards to the probably use of a blocking bot by beta command.
1730:
USAID's page on Hurricane Stan flood relief and recovery efforts
681:
379:
As part of the fallout, he apparently lost Bot approval rights:
1598:
9) After concerns were raised about his automated reporting at
385:
Knowledge (XXG):Bureaucrats' noticeboard#Another bot deflagging
1187:
with a block summary of "Using an unauthorized deletion bot" (
1817:
he used an inappropriate methodology of identifying as spam,
1751:
2137:), saying that the block was because of Irpen's comments at
1707:
737:
that I should just unblock them if I felt it innpropriate.
682:
Chrislk02's clarification why arbitration is still necessary
549:
HighinBC expresses concerns of Betacommands bolcking habits.
1446:
Passed 7 to 0, with 2 abstentions, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1703:
806:
I shall now quote a statement from the initiating party
2481:
2450:
2447:
2435:
2432:
2425:
2422:
2419:
2416:
2413:
2410:
2407:
2404:
2401:
2398:
2395:
2392:
2389:
2386:
2383:
2380:
2377:
2374:
2371:
2368:
2365:
2362:
2347:
2328:
2268:
2251:
2234:
2227:
2217:
2214:
2200:
2197:
2163:
2156:
2149:
2142:
2135:
2132:
2109:
2099:
2087:
1833:
1830:
1812:
1809:
1806:
1803:
1800:
1797:
1794:
1791:
1788:
1785:
1782:
1759:
1748:
1737:
1726:
1715:
1671:
1650:
1647:
1644:
1641:
1638:
1635:
1619:
1616:
1613:
1610:
1580:
1573:
1566:
1563:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1548:
1508:
1505:
1498:
1422:
1402:
1399:
1392:
1386:
1244:
1188:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1147:
840:
734:
731:
728:
725:
722:
718:
714:
710:
706:
619:
616:
613:
610:
607:
604:
601:
559:
540:
534:
414:
377:
1451:
Unsatisfactory communication regarding username blocks
1282:
Unsatisfactory communication regarding image deletions
373:
User talk:Betacommand/20070301#Removal of Usenet posts
2361:
His removal of over 6,500 self-links at high-speed, (
1808:), and deleting categories and inter language links (
1658:"David Wong" through "Yes, please stop" and following
841:
Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (6/1/0/0)
381:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Bots/Approvals group#Betacommand
2250:) removed the notability tag, Betacommand reverted (
1848:
Unsatisfactory communication regarding link removals
1719:
USAID Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance homepage
1263:
images tagged for speedy delete, with no regard for
802:"Assisted bots don't necessarily need bot approval."
1706:, resulting in the removal of the following links:
2219:). Chuprynka has not edited since being unblocked.
1700:United States Agency for International Development
1255:The image deletions were conducted inappropriately
350:board; they're enough for me to bring this RFAR.
1781:his automated tool was still under development (
1512:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Betacommand
1183:). On November 28, he was blocked for a week by
405:automated blocking users for username violations
323:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Betacommand
65:Once the case is closed, editors may add to the
1600:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/User names
1545:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/User names
1538:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/User names
1190:), and unblocked six and a half hours later by
1045:- User runs a bot without being in its presence
1770:The link removal was conducted inappropriately
2446:His unprotection of 171 editor's user pages (
1003:(vote counts and comments are there as well)
8:
1743:from the article on the head of the USAID, "
1497:or at any of the four editor's talk pages. (
654:was blocked. It was later unblocked with a
2346:) template substitution on 104 user pages (
628:regarding link deletion at bot like speeds.
66:
1094:Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval
51:. Evidence is more useful than comments.
1553:), including several obvious violations (
1057:- User must confirm every change manually
1676:), as well as Betacommand's reliance on
1575:) and was unblocked 12 minutes later by
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration
2131:) for 48 hours for "personal attacks" (
1385:or at any of the editor's talk pages. (
2509:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2491:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2306:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2196:), with an expiry time of indefinite (
2044:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1843:Passed 8 to 1, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1784:) and made large numbers of mistakes (
1765:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1685:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1625:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1586:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1531:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1408:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1277:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1250:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1132:Passed 6 to 1, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1118:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1104:Passed 6 to 2, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1083:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1070:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1038:(BAG) recognizes three types of bots:
1025:Passed 9 to 0, 23:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
574:comment I left regarding bad usernames
1723:Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance
1673:) which was again criticized at ANI (
816:I therefore conclude, per the policy
7:
1708:Global Development Alliance homepage
1630:High-speed removal of external links
1536:Use of an automated tool to disrupt
1036:Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Approvals group
2270:). After criticism of the block at
672:permanently damage this community.
2301:), Betacommand unblocked Jaakobou.
24:
2526:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration cases
2168:26 February: Betacommand blocked
1790:), including breaking templates (
1075:Access to automated editing tools
2144:). This block was criticized at
792:According to the BOT Policy esp
696:
638:regarding external link removal.
2049:History of inappropriate blocks
1712:The Global Development Alliance
1419:Knowledge (XXG):username policy
719:betacomamnd should be unblocked
1741:Biography of Andrew S. Natsios
1568:). Betacommand was blocked by
721:. Any users that I unblocked
1:
1413:Inappropriate username blocks
1268:Replaceable fair use disputed
1163:Replaceable fair use disputed
709:may have been poorly worded,
30:on 23:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
1796:) breaking list formatting (
739:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)
697:Chrislk02's response to Nick
689:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)
674:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)
664:-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider)
1802:), leaving empty sections (
1690:Inappropriate link removals
1514:, and three discussions at
988:Temporary injunction (none)
2542:
1174:"deletion" through "Block"
982:20:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
964:18:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
955:00:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
939:23:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
930:20:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
912:18:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
890:20:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
872:20:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
858:19:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
783:22:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
742:02:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
692:18:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
677:15:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
667:20:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
600:21 Mar 2007 00:01 - 17:34
519:20:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
496:19:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
471:19:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
445:20:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
427:18:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
38:on 23:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2213:unblocked these editors (
2104:was adding the template "
831:03:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
2437:), and drew complaints (
2311:History of poor judgment
1142:Automated image deletion
747:Statement by Betacommand
711:but I later clarified it
998:All numbering based on
707:My orignial ANI posting
643:most recent ANI posting
476:Statement by Mel Etitis
329:Statement by AnonEMouse
67:#Log of blocks and bans
2501:Betacommand desysopped
1654:User talk: Betacommand
1043:Unsupervised automatic
970:Matthew Brown (Morven)
788:Statement by Parker007
587:me expressing concerns
525:Statement by Chrislk02
2476:His edits related to
2153:User talk:Betacommand
1854:User talk:Betacommand
1495:User talk:Betacommand
1457:User talk:Betacommand
1383:User talk:Betacommand
1288:User talk:Betacommand
1170:User talk:Betacommand
836:Preliminary decisions
450:Response to Mackensen
2478:Template:Deletedpage
2342:His semi-automated (
2319:His semi-automated (
2274:, by administrators
1732:" from the article "
1049:Supervised automatic
882:Changing to accept.
794:WP:BOT#Assisted_bots
569:and on his talk page
456:By clerk permission!
317:Requests for comment
2483:) drew complaints (
2349:) drew complaints (
2330:) drew complaints (
1756:Foreign aid to Iraq
1016:1) Knowledge (XXG)
758:User:BetacommandBot
2325:current event tags
2236:). Later that day
1754:from the article "
1721:from the article "
1710:from the article "
1481:Ryan Postlethwaite
1000:/Proposed decision
705:had been opened.
432:Response to ChrisO
134:(initiating party)
60:/Proposed decision
2452:drew complaints (
2323:) removal of 130
2229:), and warned at
1761:), among others.
1752:USAID's Iraq page
1461:Benedict the Moor
1055:Manually-assisted
1030:Automated editing
813:
803:
799:
763:In regard to the
459:
2533:
2267:) for 24 hours (
2103:
2076:deleted contribs
1272:
1266:
1242:
1167:
1161:
1137:Findings of fact
961:Charles Matthews
810:
801:
797:
776:
770:
652:user:Chrisgodwin
515:
492:
454:
296:
242:
188:
133:
77:Involved parties
2541:
2540:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2516:
2515:
2503:
2498:
2313:
2253:), and blocked
2061:
2051:
1850:
1772:
1692:
1632:
1596:
1541:
1453:
1415:
1369:Timothyarnold85
1284:
1270:
1264:
1257:
1194:
1165:
1159:
1144:
1139:
1125:
1111:
1090:
1077:
1032:
1014:
1009:
995:
990:
843:
838:
808:User:AnonEMouse
790:
774:
768:
749:
715:I contacted mel
699:
684:
597:
558:22 Feb 2007 -
527:
513:
490:
478:
452:
434:
409:User:Mel Etitis
331:
319:
248:
194:
140:
85:
79:
39:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2539:
2537:
2529:
2528:
2518:
2517:
2513:
2502:
2499:
2497:
2494:
2488:
2487:
2474:
2444:
2359:
2340:
2312:
2309:
2303:
2302:
2231:Talk:Pallywood
2220:
2166:
2115:
2050:
2047:
1849:
1846:
1840:
1839:
1836:
1823:WebmasterWorld
1815:
1779:
1771:
1768:
1745:Andrew Natsios
1734:Hurricane Stan
1691:
1688:
1631:
1628:
1595:
1591:Disruption of
1589:
1540:
1534:
1452:
1449:
1414:
1411:
1320:172.202.174.36
1283:
1280:
1256:
1253:
1185:Dragons flight
1143:
1140:
1138:
1135:
1124:
1121:
1110:
1107:
1089:
1086:
1076:
1073:
1059:
1058:
1052:
1046:
1031:
1028:
1018:administrators
1013:
1012:Administrators
1010:
1008:
1005:
994:
993:Final decision
991:
989:
986:
985:
984:
966:
957:
941:
932:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
894:
893:
876:
875:
860:
842:
839:
837:
834:
789:
786:
748:
745:
698:
695:
683:
680:
647:
646:
639:
634:23 Mar 2007 -
632:
629:
624:21 Mar 2007 -
622:
595:
594:
593:
590:
583:
579:22 Feb 2007 -
577:
572:22 Feb 2007 -
570:
556:
552:20 Feb 2007 -
550:
546:18 Feb 2007 -
544:
539:28 Nov 2006 -
537:
533:27 Nov 2006 -
526:
523:
522:
521:
477:
474:
451:
448:
433:
430:
415:AN/I consensus
368:
367:
362:
357:
330:
327:
326:
325:
318:
315:
314:
313:
297:
243:
189:
135:
78:
75:
34:
26:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2538:
2527:
2524:
2523:
2521:
2514:
2511:
2510:
2506:
2500:
2495:
2493:
2492:
2485:
2482:
2479:
2475:
2472:
2469:
2466:
2463:
2460:
2457:
2454:
2451:
2448:
2445:
2442:
2439:
2436:
2433:
2430:
2426:
2423:
2420:
2417:
2414:
2411:
2408:
2405:
2402:
2399:
2396:
2393:
2390:
2387:
2384:
2381:
2378:
2375:
2372:
2369:
2366:
2363:
2360:
2357:
2354:
2351:
2348:
2345:
2341:
2338:
2335:
2332:
2329:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2310:
2308:
2307:
2300:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2266:
2263:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2249:
2246:
2243:
2239:
2235:
2232:
2228:
2225:
2221:
2218:
2215:
2212:
2211:Alex Bakharev
2208:
2205:
2201:
2198:
2195:
2192:
2189:
2185:
2181:
2178:
2175:
2171:
2167:
2164:
2161:
2160:Alex Bakharev
2157:
2154:
2150:
2147:
2143:
2140:
2136:
2133:
2130:
2127:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2113:
2110:
2107:
2106:toomuchtrivia
2101:
2098:
2095:
2092:
2089:
2086:
2083:
2080:
2077:
2074:
2071:
2068:
2065:
2060:
2059:69.85.184.134
2056:
2055:
2054:
2048:
2046:
2045:
2041:
2039:
2036:
2035:George.Saliba
2032:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1999:
1995:
1991:
1988:
1984:
1981:
1977:
1974:
1970:
1969:64.160.39.153
1966:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1928:
1925:
1921:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1907:
1903:
1900:
1896:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1847:
1845:
1844:
1837:
1834:
1831:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1813:
1810:
1807:
1804:
1801:
1798:
1795:
1792:
1789:
1786:
1783:
1780:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1769:
1767:
1766:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1704:www.usaid.gov
1702:'s web site:
1701:
1698:links to the
1697:
1689:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1679:
1675:
1672:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1648:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1636:
1629:
1627:
1626:
1622:
1620:
1617:
1614:
1611:
1608:
1604:
1601:
1594:
1590:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1581:
1578:
1574:
1571:
1567:
1564:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1552:
1549:
1546:
1539:
1535:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1526:
1523:
1520:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1506:
1503:
1499:
1496:
1492:
1489:
1485:
1482:
1478:
1475:
1471:
1468:
1465:
1462:
1458:
1450:
1448:
1447:
1443:
1441:
1438:
1435:
1432:
1429:
1426:
1423:
1420:
1412:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1397:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1384:
1380:
1377:
1373:
1370:
1366:
1363:
1359:
1356:
1352:
1349:
1345:
1342:
1338:
1335:
1331:
1328:
1324:
1321:
1317:
1314:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1296:
1293:
1289:
1281:
1279:
1278:
1274:
1269:
1262:
1254:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1245:
1240:
1237:
1234:
1231:
1228:
1225:
1222:
1219:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1207:
1204:
1201:
1198:
1193:
1189:
1186:
1182:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1164:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1148:
1141:
1136:
1134:
1133:
1129:
1122:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1109:Communication
1108:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1099:
1095:
1087:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1074:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1065:
1056:
1053:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1037:
1029:
1027:
1026:
1022:
1019:
1011:
1006:
1004:
1002:
1001:
992:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
967:
965:
962:
958:
956:
952:
948:
947:
942:
940:
937:
933:
931:
928:
925:
921:
920:
913:
910:
907:
902:
898:
897:
896:
895:
892:
891:
888:
885:
880:
879:
878:
877:
874:
873:
870:
867:
861:
859:
856:
852:
851:The Uninvited
848:
845:
844:
835:
833:
832:
829:
824:
821:
819:
814:
809:
804:
795:
787:
785:
784:
781:
773:
766:
761:
759:
755:
746:
744:
743:
740:
736:
732:
729:
726:
723:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
694:
693:
690:
679:
678:
675:
669:
668:
665:
659:
657:
653:
644:
641:26 Mar 207 -
640:
637:
633:
630:
627:
623:
620:
617:
614:
611:
608:
605:
602:
599:
598:
591:
588:
584:
581:
578:
575:
571:
568:
564:
560:
557:
554:
551:
548:
545:
542:
538:
535:
532:
531:
530:
524:
520:
516:
510:
505:
500:
499:
498:
497:
493:
487:
483:
475:
473:
472:
469:
464:
457:
449:
447:
446:
443:
439:
431:
429:
428:
425:
421:
416:
412:
410:
406:
400:
397:
393:
387:
386:
382:
378:
374:
366:
363:
361:
358:
356:
353:
352:
351:
349:
345:
342:
339:
335:
328:
324:
321:
320:
316:
311:
308:
305:
301:
298:
294:
291:
288:
285:
282:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
264:
261:
258:
255:
252:
247:
244:
240:
237:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
193:
190:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
139:
136:
131:
128:
125:
122:
119:
116:
113:
110:
107:
104:
101:
98:
95:
92:
89:
84:
81:
80:
76:
74:
72:
68:
63:
61:
57:
52:
50:
46:
40:
37:
32:
29:
19:
2512:
2508:
2507:
2504:
2490:
2489:
2314:
2305:
2304:
2298:and others (
2261:
2244:
2190:
2176:
2125:
2096:
2090:
2084:
2078:
2072:
2066:
2052:
2043:
2042:
1996:(again) and
1987:Vanrozenheim
1962:Violask81976
1915:(again) and
1892:Jordan Brown
1856:, including
1851:
1842:
1841:
1825:as reported
1818:
1773:
1764:
1763:
1695:
1693:
1684:
1683:
1669:
1633:
1624:
1623:
1597:
1585:
1584:
1542:
1530:
1529:
1459:, including
1454:
1445:
1444:
1416:
1407:
1406:
1313:Citizensmith
1290:, including
1285:
1276:
1275:
1260:
1258:
1249:
1248:
1235:
1229:
1223:
1217:
1211:
1205:
1199:
1145:
1131:
1130:
1126:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1103:
1102:
1091:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1069:
1068:
1063:
1060:
1054:
1048:
1042:
1033:
1024:
1023:
1015:
997:
996:
951:bananabucket
944:
900:
881:
862:
846:
825:
822:
815:
805:
791:
762:
750:
700:
685:
670:
660:
648:
585:23 Feb 2007
528:
479:
453:
437:
435:
413:
401:
388:
369:
340:
332:
306:
289:
283:
277:
271:
265:
259:
253:
235:
229:
223:
217:
211:
205:
199:
181:
175:
169:
163:
157:
151:
145:
126:
120:
114:
108:
102:
96:
90:
64:
53:
41:
35:
33:
27:
25:
2162:unblocked (
1980:LeinadSpoon
1931:Mithridates
1678:this survey
1215:protections
924:Paul August
780:Betacommand
636:ANI posting
626:ANI posting
541:betacommand
334:Betacommand
269:protections
215:protections
161:protections
138:Betacommand
106:protections
36:Case Closed
28:Case Opened
2296:Mel Etitis
2284:SlimVirgin
2094:block user
2088:filter log
2009:AnonEMouse
1994:Fredsmith2
1973:Fredsmith2
1924:AnonEMouse
1899:AnonEMouse
1888:Susanlesch
1227:page moves
1088:Admin bots
1007:Principles
823:Sincerly,
772:notability
509:Mel Etitis
486:Mel Etitis
468:AnonEMouse
442:AnonEMouse
424:AnonEMouse
281:page moves
246:Mel Etitis
227:page moves
173:page moves
118:page moves
83:AnonEMouse
2429:taxoboxes
2427:) and in
2292:Chrislk02
2224:Pallywood
2184:Chuprynka
2170:Hillock65
2151:) and at
2100:block log
2028:Dbachmann
2011:(again) (
1941:(again),
1926:(again) (
1474:(jarbarf)
1378:(twice) (
1348:HarryCane
1336:(twice) (
1329:(twice) (
1315:(twice) (
1301:(twice) (
1221:deletions
906:Mackensen
884:Mackensen
866:Mackensen
828:Parker007
765:Pallywood
300:Parker007
275:deletions
221:deletions
192:Chrislk02
167:deletions
112:deletions
56:/Workshop
49:/Evidence
45:Talk page
2520:Category
2496:Remedies
2265:contribs
2255:Jaakobou
2248:contribs
2238:Jaakobou
2194:contribs
2180:contribs
2129:contribs
2070:contribs
2024:kingboyk
2016:Gandoman
1943:HighInBC
1939:Arichnad
1917:Arichnad
1884:Rsholmes
1866:Kla'quot
1858:DMighton
1502:HighInBC
1376:ceejayoz
1355:Wisekwai
1334:HighInBC
1203:contribs
1123:Blocking
968:Accept.
959:Accept.
946:Blnguyen
943:Accept.
936:FloNight
934:Accept.
922:Accept.
901:possible
396:proposal
344:contribs
310:contribs
257:contribs
203:contribs
149:contribs
94:contribs
2158:), and
2139:WP:PAIN
1570:Pschemp
1362:Zanimum
1341:Jenolen
1096:and/or
847:Accept.
703:WP:RFCN
656:WP:RFCN
563:WP:RFCN
504:WP:AN/I
482:WP:AN/I
2344:WP:AWB
2321:WP:AWB
2280:Friday
2272:WP:ANI
2209:) and
2204:WP:ANI
2182:) and
2146:WP:ANI
2020:Chacor
1998:Onorem
1960:, and
1947:taviso
1862:wrp103
1835:); and
1750:) and
1662:WP:ANI
1660:) and
1607:WP:AIV
1593:WP:AIV
1516:WP:ANI
1488:Friday
1486:) and
1396:WP:ANI
1233:rights
1209:blocks
1178:WP:ANI
1098:WP:RFA
909:(talk)
887:(talk)
869:(talk)
818:WP:BOT
754:WP:BAG
730:, and
567:WP:ANI
348:WP:ANI
287:rights
263:blocks
233:rights
209:blocks
179:rights
155:blocks
124:rights
100:blocks
2288:jossi
2276:Jayjg
2119:Irpen
2005:Ehheh
1935:BigDT
1913:intgr
1906:Conti
1877:Ehheh
1873:intgr
1656:(See
1621:).
1577:Wangi
1327:Dgies
1306:Visor
1299:Tvccs
1292:Irpen
1172:(see
853:Co.,
392:USAID
16:<
2259:talk
2242:talk
2188:talk
2174:talk
2123:talk
2082:logs
2064:talk
2033:);
2026:and
2007:and
1971:and
1958:Flex
1954:Angr
1945:and
1890:and
1875:and
1871:]);
1864:and
1827:here
1442:).
1197:talk
1192:Geni
1176:and
855:Inc.
800:and
735:told
514:Talk
491:Talk
438:good
338:talk
304:talk
251:talk
197:talk
143:talk
88:talk
2226:, (
2014:);
2003:);
1992:);
1985:);
1978:);
1967:);
1952:);
1929:);
1922:);
1911:);
1904:);
1897:);
1882:);
1819:all
1758:" (
1747:" (
1739:),
1736:" (
1728:),
1725:" (
1717:),
1714:" (
1696:all
1667:).
1582:).
1527:).
1483:: (
1479:),
1472:),
1404:).
1374:),
1367:),
1360:),
1357:: (
1353:),
1346:),
1339:),
1332:),
1325:),
1318:),
1311:),
1304:),
1297:),
1261:all
1246:).
1239:RfA
1064:may
458::-)
293:RfA
239:RfA
185:RfA
130:RfA
62:.
2522::
2486:).
2473:).
2470:,
2467:,
2464:,
2461:,
2458:,
2455:,
2449:,
2443:).
2440:,
2434:,
2424:,
2421:,
2418:,
2415:,
2409:,
2406:,
2403:,
2400:,
2397:,
2394:,
2391:,
2388:,
2385:,
2382:,
2379:,
2376:,
2373:,
2370:,
2367:,
2364:,
2358:).
2355:,
2352:,
2339:).
2336:,
2333:,
2294:,
2290:,
2286:,
2282:,
2278:,
2216:,
2206::
2199:,
2165:).
2022:,
2018:,
1956:,
1937:,
1933:,
1886:,
1860:,
1832:,
1814:);
1811:,
1805:,
1799:,
1793:,
1787:,
1649:,
1646:,
1643:,
1640:,
1618:,
1615:,
1612:,
1609:(
1562:,
1559:,
1556:,
1550:,
1524:,
1521:,
1507:,
1504::
1469:,
1466:,
1436:,
1433:,
1430:,
1427:,
1401:,
1391:,
1271:}}
1265:{{
1166:}}
1160:{{
1155:,
1152:,
1149:,
1100:.
980:)
953:)
826:--
775:}}
769:{{
760:.
727:,
724:,
618:,
615:,
612:,
609:,
606:,
603:,
517:)
507:--
494:)
407:.
383:;
73:.
2480:(
2431:(
2327:(
2262:·
2257:(
2245:·
2240:(
2191:·
2186:(
2177:·
2172:(
2155:(
2148:(
2141:(
2126:·
2121:(
2102:)
2097:·
2091:·
2085:·
2079:·
2073:·
2067:·
2062:(
2037:(
2030:(
2000:(
1989:(
1982:(
1975:(
1964:(
1949:(
1919:(
1908:(
1901:(
1894:(
1879:(
1868:(
1829:(
1664:(
1602:(
1579:(
1547:(
1490:(
1476:(
1463:(
1398:(
1371:(
1364:(
1350:(
1343:(
1322:(
1308:(
1294:(
1241:)
1236:·
1230:·
1224:·
1218:·
1212:·
1206:·
1200:·
1195:(
1180:(
978:C
976::
974:T
972:(
949:(
927:☎
511:(
488:(
341:·
336:(
312:)
307:·
302:(
295:)
290:·
284:·
278:·
272:·
266:·
260:·
254:·
249:(
241:)
236:·
230:·
224:·
218:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
195:(
187:)
182:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
132:)
127:·
121:·
115:·
109:·
103:·
97:·
91:·
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.