2291:- I have participated in date-linking discussions previously, and while I don't hold a very strong opinion on the central issues, and my opinion has shifted over time (to the stage where I support most, but not all, date delinking), I'm involved enough and have discussed this with several of the editors concerned (at least four of the parties), to the extent that I don't feel I could impartially judge the behaviour issues here. I do agree with those who have stated that this case should most emphatically be about the behaviour here, and not the content. Incivility, unnecessarily strong criticism, tendentiousness, inability to compromise or see the other side's arguments, misreading of consensus (possibly in good faith, or being blinded by bias), edit warring, attacks against bot operators, impatient and unhelpful responses by bot operators, misguided application of the manual of style, and other issues, are among those that have taken place here (just a selection of the behaviour on both sides). I also echo the comments by those who point out that date delinking is not really the most urgent matter to be resolved here.
1764:
either full dates or bare years or the occasional more exotic combination. That's about 7000 articles delinked. If delinking were seriously disputed – by more than just Locke Cole and a few vocal others - you’d expect me to get a lot of complaints. How many have I had? Seven. In three cases I explained about the MoS and my argument was accepted. In two cases the editors wouldn’t accept that, so I just left them to it. And in two cases editors were so uncivil that no attempt at reasoned argument could have made any difference. This gives the lie to Locke Cole's suggestion that the changes are being steamrollered in. It's just that he doesn’t agree, plain and simple, and he won’t concede that the argument is lost. The community accepts the changes. The evidence is clear.
1756:, then even when he’d lost the RFCs – one of them specifically on the issue of using automated processes to implement the MoS - he’s still trying to say that there’s isn’t consensus to bring the encyclopaedia into line with its own Manual of Style, and also saying that MOSNUM is only a guideline and he doesn’t have to obey it anyway. This is someone who just can’t accepts that things aren’t going his way and is disrupting everyone else to make his point. The claim of incivility is just another spurious attempt to keep the dispute going – as Tony1 said "there have been instances of frayed tempers on both sides" - but none of it has resulted in anything that the ArbCom need be spending its time looking at.
943:
resolve them" (and related concerns by Arb. Vassyana) are laudable, but my experience in that forum suggests that MOSNUM talk will just have to wade through its difficulties as best it can, just as always: MOSNUM, indeed, deals with the most contentious issues of all style guides. I believe that any threat to the "stability to articles" (a concern for Arb. FloNight) has been overstated. Colonies Chris provides statistical and anecdotal evidence of a quite different situation. In summary, I think we're over the worst of it, and things go on despite the tension surrounding the issue (notably, in the past few weeks Locke Cole and Tennis expert have been very supportive of an unrelated initiative of mine).
1242:
the heated MOSNUM discussions, and most of the admins at MOSNUM were somehow involved in the debate and could not provide a neutral third opinion. I will note that those who have been complaining about the date delinking are largely a small minority group. In most cases, when users have asked questions about the delinking activities, they are given a polite, easy-to-understand answer, which is usually accepted without much complaint. The fact that there has not been a flurry of new complaints demonstrates that there is significant consensus for the date delinkings to occur. Therefore, I ask that the
Arbitration Commitee decline this case and allow other forms of dispute resolution, such as
1760:
date links in articles, and you have about half a million articles still with some form of date linking, at a conservative estimate. What the objectors seem to forget when they object to automated delinking is that those links weren’t made by people carefully considering the merits of whether a particular date should be linked. They were made because that’s what the MoS recommended (in the case of autoformatting) or because the syntax of autoformatting is so unintuitive that the average editor tended to just link all bare years and other date fragments and time periods willy-nilly.
1898:, unless (in the words of FloNight) there is good evidence of a clear ongoing consensus building process that will end with a well-accepted solution. I think there are clear behavioral issues for ArbCom to examine here. The use of the consensus-building process and interpretation of its resolutions seems to be a fundamental issue here, along with related behavioral concerns. There is also a broad range of alleged behavioral issues surrounding these cirucmstances, including but not limited to (semi)automated tool abuse, incivility, OWNership, forum shopping and system gaming.
879:(2) If there are residual concerns about the claims of "incivility and poor behaviour on the part of the proponents of this change", I believe that a thorough examination of behaviour would conclude that there have been instances of frayed tempers on both sides, but that given the length of the discourse (some six months), this is not out of the ordinary and that other forums have been and could still be used to gain resolution. I do not see incivility as a major ongoing problem, and feel that in this context it has been overstated.
1449:, the process he believed was broken is only appears so because a handful of individuals, led by the plaintiff, have demonstrated utter disrespect for the consensus, using all means at their disposal to repeatedly "reinterpret" the declared will of the people. I have full confidence in ArbCom that this subversion not be allowed to pass, for it will surely be a day for the annals of WP as the beginning of the end - one of its fundamental pillars, the consensus model will be irreparably shattered, to be replaced by
816:
lost on the proponents of the change either: I get the general impression they feel empowered in these discussions to dismiss compromises and alternatives out of hand (yet another reason for the mass delinkings to stop). Hence my motion request. The community should be able to handle this, but not while editors are pushing their preferred version of things on the rest of us. Worth noting: there are 6,884,804 articles on
Knowledge (XXG), I really doubt all of them have been delinked already. —
1777:
the MoS, where were the other tennis editors standing up to support this supposed local consensus? There were none - because it existed only in Tennis Expert's mind, as a justification for his insistence that everyone do things his way. Like it or not, hardly anyone has complained – see the facts in my statement above. And I have not imtimidated anyone, nor steam-rollered, edit warred, nor made aggressive posts and edit summaries. The evidence is open to anyone to examine.
1111:, respectively). Both are experienced and influential editors with a long track record on Knowledge (XXG). The only block on Tony’s record was quickly withdrawn as being done in error. These sort of track records just don’t happen by accident; they happen only by an editor exhibiting a consistent pattern of being logical and reasonable and by abiding by Knowledge (XXG)’s rules—even when under duress when acting in a leadership capacity, as Tony often finds himself in.
1297:, parry and recoil, but find myself no match for the plaintiff's aggressive and unrelenting onslaught. The plaintiff has consistently made it clear that he considers any form of delinking disruptive behaviour. This uncompromising stance makes for uneasy discussion. Things have gone so far and gone on for so long that I simply no longer believe that he takes no pleasure in seeing me blocked.
882:(3) I want to put on record that in the view of many users, the trialling, implementation and refinement of automated and semi-automated means for assisting editors to comply with the style guides WRT the removal of date-autoformatting, and the cleaning up the rather messy state of underlying date formats, have been characterised by politeness, cooperation and sensitivity to critical feedback.
763:") while objections and disputes remain unresolved or unanswered. Further than that, there remains the disparaging behavior of those who simply wish to ignore objections ("this is a waste of time", "don't you have something better to do", "this is only being continued by a 'gang of five'", etc). Remarks which are unhelpful at reaching a consensus, I might add. —
962:. Although using this as a test-case for establishing/confirming/changing the rules for bot usage might be possible, the technical complexities needed to underpin a judgement make me quiver. If this is to be part or all of the scope of a case, I submit that the scope be very tightly defined from the start (as suggested by Arb. Vandenberg). Please note that
2362:
the performance of administrative tasks. Editors making any or all of these types of contributions are welcome. The project and our progress toward our goals are diminished if we drive away or demoralize a good-faith editor who contributes or has the potential to contribute, while complying with
Knowledge (XXG) policies, in any or all of these areas.
2422:
of the behavior of those they are in disputes with. Inappropriate behavior by other editors does not legitimize one's own misconduct, though it may be considered as a mitigating factor in some circumstances. Moreover, users who have been justifiably criticized or formally sanctioned for improper conduct are expected to avoid repeating that conduct.
6154:
1289:. There has been a micron-thin veneer of civility (usually in terse language wrapped in brown paper) but the underlying incivility is undeniable. You may not find extreme civility from me nor from Greg, but our wrapping is transparent film, so what you see is what you get. The plaintiff has had a strong influence on how this debate has taken on a
6729:(2) All remedies in the decision providing that a specified user is "prohibited from reversion of changes which are principally stylistic, except where all style elements are prescribed in the applicable style guideline" are modified by replacing these words with the words "prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates";
6732:(3) All editors whose restrictions are being narrowed are reminded to abide by all applicable policies and guidelines in their editing, so that further controversies such as the one that led to the arbitration case will not arise, and any disagreements concerning style guidelines can be addressed in a civil and efficient fashion;
696:
been asked to stop because their changes are disputed and do not have consensus. We've held numerous discussions, conducted a month long RFC (which involved the community and was listed in the watchlist) and have no consensus for these mass automated changes as they're being enacted. In a prior ArbCom decision it was stated:
714:
attacks, and so forth) of those involved can be looked at. I understand the committee doesn't take up content disputes, but I fear this situation will not end without binding arbitration as those involved seem unwilling to consider compromises which don't involve automated date delinking. Thank you for your consideration. —
6735:(4) Any party who believes the Date delinking decision should be further amended may file a new request for amendment. To allow time to evaluate the effect of the amendments already made, editors are asked to wait at least 30 days after this motion is passed before submitting any further amendment requests.
839:
effectively present us with a situation that's already to their liking. And the thing to keep in mind is that Date delinker isn't the only one performing these operations. It wouldn't surprise me if there were already 50,000 edits of this type (combined amongst all automated and semi-automated accounts). —
6254:
3.1) If the Manual of style has not stabilised within three months after the close of the case, the committee will open a review of the conduct of the parties engaged in this battle and hand out permanent MOS bans to any parties who have actively prevented the manual of style stabilising on a version
6220:
While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still
6187:
Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction
3188:
by several administrators and arbitrators for running fast automated date delinking processes. At the time he stopped editing, there was apparently a great degree of controversy at his talk page and the block lengths were a week to a month in length. Also, he submitted several rejected date-related
2697:
19) System administrators are responsible for the MediaWiki software configuration of the projects run by the
Wikimedia Foundation, such as English Knowledge (XXG). They make changes to configuration based on a mix of Wikimedia Foundation, technical and project considerations. While their decisions
1776:
that there is a local consensus (on tennis-related articles) that overrides the MoS needs to be exposed for the self-serving nonsense that it is. When various dates in tennis-related articles were being unlinked, in line with the MoS, and Tennis Expert was reverting those changes, in contravention of
1763:
Here are some facts; most of what I do on WP is gnoming. Since the MoS was changed to deprecate autoformatting, I've been routinely unlinking dates in the course of my other edits. I estimate that I've edited about 10,000 articles, and roughly 70% of those edits involved some sort of date delinking –
1751:
First of all, this whole case is a blatant example of forum shopping. Locke Cole has opposed these changes tooth and nail from the very start – first he lost the argument on the changes to MOSNUM, then he tried to claim that delinking was disruptive even though it was line with MOSNUM; then he tried
1363:
which the plaintiff is attempting to put through in the latter. While there may be some limited discussion and agreement to merge the two, the timing of that action, together with the nature of amendments which have been made by the plaintiff (thus opening up another front in this dispute) while this
838:
The fait accompli is from the sheer magnitude of the edits being performed. As John
Vandenberg notes, Date delinker has performed nearly 9,000 edits of this variety. Unless those of us on the other side choose to engage in identical behavior (using a bot or semi-automatic script to relink dates) they
2681:
are trusted members of the community and are expected to follow
Knowledge (XXG) policies. They are expected to pursue their duties to the best of their abilities. Occasional mistakes are entirely compatible with this; members are not expected to be perfect. However, consistently or egregiously poor
2508:
8) When either of two styles are acceptable it is inappropriate for a
Knowledge (XXG) editor to change from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change. For example, with respect to British spelling as opposed to American spelling it would be acceptable to change from
2361:
2) Contributors to
Knowledge (XXG) may benefit the project by participating in a variety of ways. Good-faith participation is welcome whether it comes in the form of editorial contributions, image contributions, wiki-gnoming, bot and script writing and operation, policy design and implementation, or
1759:
The claim that ‘the bot has unlinked everything already’ is utter nonsense. I’ve just picked a random date (September 12) and checked what links to it – there are about 7000 links, even disregarding links to calendar-related articles. Multiply that up by 365, divide by, say, 5, to allow for multiple
1679:
Please note that I am not asking the ArbCom to rule on the content issue of whether dates should be linked; I am perfectly aware that that is beyond their remit. Whatever the result is for that in the future, all parties should be expected to abide by it and discuss it in a fair and sanguine manner,
1085:
Clearly, with 6,884,804 articles on en.Knowledge (XXG), there are probably over a million date links to be fixed, the vast majority of which take readers to unrelated historical trivia that has little if any relevance to the topic of the article containing the links. This is far too many to manually
1032:
techniques to let readers know of the availability of these types of history-related articles. Furthermore, this method fully discloses the precise nature of the article a reader would be taken to if they clicked on the link. Since Tony, I, and others found ourselves often repeating the same message
954:
interpretation of the detailed RfCs at MOSNUM, which were not framed in a way that was ever going to produce clear results, is not something I'd wish on the arbitrators; in addition, those RfCs would need to be interpreted in the context of a huge amount of other information—they are only the tip of
942:
in this matter, which has not been out of the ordinary—indeed, the matter has been characterised by relative civility, even though the filer has concentrated on making a case that rudeness and chaos abound. Arb. Rlevse's concerns for "more input on behavioral issues related to MOSNUM and attempts to
700:
Editors who are collectively or individually making large numbers of similar edits, and are apprised that those edits are controversial or disputed, are expected to attempt to resolve the dispute through discussion. It is inappropriate to use repetition or volume in order to present opponents with a
695:
This has been an ongoing content dispute for the past six months that has repeatedly degenerated into incivility and poor behavior on the part of the proponents of this change. At the moment we have editors using a single script to mass delink dates (collectively over thousands of articles) who have
2909:
3.3.1) All three of the RfCs regarding date links have been plagued by disputes regarding wording, presentation, claims of bias, and related issues. These disputes continued through the drafting and comment phases, as well as persisting after RfC closures. Additionally, there are varied and sharply
2661:
16) Like administrators and other editors in positions of trust, bot operators have a heightened responsibility to the community. Bot operators are expected to respond reasonably to questions or concerns about the operation of their bot. An editor who (even in good faith) misuses automated editing
2421:
4) Perfection is not expected from editors, it being understood that everyone will occasionally make mistakes or misjudgments. However, an overall record of compliance with site policies and norms is expected, especially from regular contributors. Editors are expected to adhere to policy regardless
2311:
1.1) Until this case is decided or otherwise directed by the
Arbitration Committee, all editors are instructed not to engage in any program of mass linking or delinking of dates in existing articles, including but not limited to through the use of bots, scripts, tools, or otherwise. This injunction
1929:
have been brewing for roughly two years and I keep seeing many of the same users involved in the disputes. The issue of whether to link or not link dates is clearly a content issue outside of arbcom's purview. I'd like to see more input on behavioral issues related to MOSNUM and attempts to resolve
1241:
of the debate have remained civil most of the time. Lastly, I do not believe that all other courses of dispute resolution have been used. Other than the Date
Linking RFCs, there has been little interaction from editors, admin or not, to give their input. The ANI threads were usually importations of
1144:
the sort of tendentious editing that would account for such a block record. He cloaks uncivil, disruptive editing behind a veneer of civil words, much the same way a mugger might take care to not end his sentences with a preposition as he courteously relieves you of your wallet with a knife. I have
1002:
I really do want to avoid having my activities on one of my hobbies—Knowledge (XXG)—defined by the whims of others. So I expect (hope) to have a minimum of participation here. I just don’t want to be dragged down in the mud with unproductive bickering over something like how to format a date in an
815:
from the table. This situation right now makes it impossible (or really difficult) to discuss the issue when a sense of inevitability pervades all discussions ("we're doing this, so talk all you want, but while you were typing that up, I delinked another hundred articles"). This inevitability isn't
2645:
15) Editors who collectively or individually make large numbers of similar edits, and who are apprised that those edits are controversial or disputed, are expected to attempt to resolve the dispute through discussion. It is inappropriate to use repetition or volume to present opponents with a fait
2488:
7.1) Users confronted with inappropriate behavior should not respond in kind, or engage in sustained editorial conflict or unbridled criticism across different forums; inappropriate behavior by others does not legitimize one's own. Editors who have genuine grievances against others are expected to
1645:
that I shouldn't "be surprised if you see a rash of editors suppressing a discussion that has been brought up many times", and adding that "It is time to move on". In other words, if you raise the issue you'll be told to shut up, so go away. I do not believe that it is appropriate behavior for any
1308:
is "only a guideline" implying that compliance therewith is not mandatory. He has been all over town on his complains in attempts to stymie all efforts to clear the detritus, which a very significant number of users have expressed strongly wanting done away with within the project. I have stripped
713:
All of the editors involved in this dispute are aware of this decision (they were warned about it months ago), but they continue to operate under the assumption that their actions have consensus. I urge the committee to accept this case so the behavior (incivility, edit warring, stalking, personal
2761:
Policies, procedures and the manual of style may govern how and when the software may be used, however decisions to deprecate or disable software features are best left in the hands of the technical staff. Likewise, decisions which will involve large scale changes (e.g. hundreds of thousands of
2574:
is a set of guidelines governing appropriate editing on Knowledge (XXG). The Manual is prescriptive in areas that enjoy broad consensus; where there is no such consensus, the available options are described, but no prescriptive guidance is provided. Editors are expected to follow the Manual of
2377:
3) Knowledge (XXG) users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users; to approach even difficult situations in a dignified fashion and with a constructive and collaborative outlook; and to avoid acting in a manner that brings the project into
1326:
To conclude, The way forward? I have already moved on, and am now concentrating my MOSNUM efforts to unifying date formats within articles. I am glad this ArbCom request is the last resort, because I would dearly like to see an end to this matter, which has been the most gigantesque distraction.
972:
might be an option. While focusing on small intervals of time or collating diffs over a long interval (as above) might give the impression that there are "no visible signs of abating" (Arb. Coren), the noise created by the few is likely to recede, given the strong support in the community for a
6228:
All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally
6224:
These provisions apply only to contentious topics placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorised by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special
2019:
Comment Because of the potential for a dispute on this topic to cause instability to a large amount of articles and the length of the dispute, I'm willing to take this case sooner rather than late, unless there if good evidence of clear ongoing consensus building process that will end with well
758:
I do not believe Mediation or a Third Opinion would help here. We've already solicited the entire community via a watchlist notice, and a slightly uninvolved administrator (Masem) has tried multiple times to try and mediate the issue. To no avail, it seems. The core behavioral issue here is the
7044:
Remedies 16 and 18 (as amended) are terminated, effective immediately. Ohconfucius is reminded that this subject remains within the jurisdiction of the Arbitration Committee, and that he is expected to abide by all applicable policies and guidelines, especially those concerning the editing and
2224:
Quick reply to two comments (by Locke Cole and Protonk), I certainly agree that making superficial editorial changes along with delinking dates is substantially the same as just delinking them; I was thinking really of manual routine page maintenance rather than automated mass changes. I would
1010:. As you can see, right at the beginning is a date, 7 April 1795, that is unlinked. Further, since the SI’s kilogram is not closely associated with the United States, I elected to consistently use the international-style date format throughout the article. Note also the two date-related links,
2757:
21) The MediaWiki software used on the Wikimedia projects, and configuration of that software, is the responsibility of the developers and system administrators. In the same way that system administrators are the decision makers to enable new functionality, deprecation or removal of MediaWiki
2625:
are also computer algorithms utilized to automate or semi-automate certain types of editing. These tools are extremely valuable for the purpose of facilitating the making of multiple edits that would be unduly time-consuming or tedious for a human editor to perform manually. Approval from the
872:
That the basis of the application is a content dispute is reinforced by this subsequent statement by the filing party: "I understand the committee doesn't take up content disputes, but I fear this situation will not end without binding arbitration as those involved seem unwilling to consider
2955:
Due to the English Knowledge (XXG) Date debate, and the complexity of the problem, the bug was conflated with many issues, suggestions and feature requests. A number of these suggestions were built by developer Bill Clark between September 2008 and November 2008. During the course of this
6726:(1) All remedies in the decision providing that a specified user is topic-banned from editing or discussing "style and editing guidelines" (or similar wording) are modified by replacing these words with the words "style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates";
2437:
5) Edit-warring is harmful. When disagreements arise, users are expected to discuss their differences rationally rather than reverting ad infinitum. Revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique.
1098:
Another important factor to consider is which camp of editors is best trying to adhere to the community consensus on this matter. How is it that we are all here at ArbCom after a month‑long series of RfCs that enjoyed wide input? I am not seeing any pattern of behavioral problems with the
1280:
and I have locked horns over the issue almost continually from September 2008 onwards. For the record, said editor is one of approximately five individuals totally opposed to removal of Date-autoformatting, and must be credited for having raised the issue most vocally in a manner akin to
5845:
Locke Cole is reminded to abide by all applicable policies and guidelines in his editing, so that further controversies such as the one that led to the arbitration case will not arise, and any disagreements concerning style guidelines can be addressed in a civil and efficient
2698:
may affect the English Knowledge (XXG), those decisions are binding on the projects and beyond the jurisdiction of the English Knowledge (XXG) community and its Arbitration Committee. The local community may, of course, challenge these decisions at meta forums, such as
2053:; I'm inclined to accept a case when the topic focus causes large, repeated threads on noticeboards with no visible signs of abating. This invariably means there is a behavioral problem, even if the problem is the repeated call to arms rather than the issue itself. —
182:
Please do not edit this page directly unless you are either 1) an Arbitrator, 2) an Arbitration Clerk, or 3) adding yourself to this case. Statements on this page are original comments provided when the Committee was initially requested to Arbitrate this page (at
889:
in the first RfC cited above provided strong consensus that the use of an automatic or semi-automatic process to bring article text into compliance with any particular guideline in the Manual of Style (dates and numbers) requires no separate or prior consensus.
3245:
The request was denied on October 22, 2008 by BAG member Mr.Z-man, with BAG members Bjweeks and Martinp23 also indicating that it was inappropriate for a bot to be undertaking delinking based on what they considered to be an insufficient level of consensus.
2036:. Not to make a content ruling but to assist in developing a process that will result in stability to articles and address any user conduct issues that may be causing local article discussion or global topic discussions to stall without forming consensus.
6121:
Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:
6188:
placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions.
2826:
706:
2758:
functionality is a technical decision, and implementation of that decision may have technical implications that need to be considered. The project community should engage the technical team in decisions which relate to use of the software.
1313:
torrent of abuse. Of course Locke was well within his rights to demand clarification on the matter at RfC, but his adamant refusal to take 'no' for an answer, which ordinarily might do him credit for tenacity, can also be viewed as having a
1090:
be linked and which are accidentally swept up by bot activity can easily be hand-restored. Furthermore, as I have illustrated above, there are alternative, often superior ways to let readers know about relevant material, such as entries in
1086:
bring into compliance; human-guided bots are the only way I know of to address such an undertaking. The RfCs show that it should be a rare date indeed that is linked in the form of blued, in‑line body text. So the very few dates that
2020:
accepted solution. If the discussion is stalling due to problematic user conduct, then can address it if needed. If issues of unauthorized bot usage need to be addressed then make that clear. Please cite specifics of any problems.
1318:
dimension. Anyhow, there were few indications that Locke was ever committed to be bound by the outcome of the RfC, so this move hardly comes as a surprise. In fact. Lock has been strategically planning seizing this committee since
3692:
4423:
2737:
and may be improved by anyone, by way of bug reports, design documents, code patches, technical documentation, etc. Fair criticism of open source software is acceptable; however, it is incumbent on everyone to participate in
2205:
There are two caveats to my opinion. First, the issue of whether to link or delink dates is not, in my mind, entirely on a level with the merging and deleting seen in the Episodes and characters case, and does not create the
1680:
as for any other policy issue. No result has yet been found, and therefore it is inappropriate for any editor or group of editors to be acting as if it has. For that reason I have added myself as a co-sponsor of this RfAr. —
1410:
to achieve edit speeds of several pages a minute, which triggered WP's spam-guard mechanisms and alerted some admins to block the suspected bot. My arguments that I was not operating a bot was looked at and was accepted by
2662:
tools, such as bots and scripts, or fails to respond appropriately to concerns from the community about their use over a period of time, may lose the privilege of using such tools or may have such privilege restricted.
1629:
This was immediately after I had taken the time to go through the RfC in search. While there were undeniably a number of voices (roughly 40) agreeing with the proposal that "Year links should never be made", there were
2329:
2312:
is entered as an interim measure and does not reflect any prejudgment of any aspect of the case. The Clerk will notify the parties of this temporary injunction and post a note of it on the appropriate policy page(s).
199:
3764:
1212:
The diversity of the English Knowledge (XXG) means that disputes are inevitable, and it is unrealistic to believe that 100% support can be garnered for most things. The Date Linking RFCs clearly indicated that there
6183:
Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied.
6111:
This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the
4636:
1.3) All mass date delinking is restricted for six months. For six months, no mass date delinking should be done until the Arbitration Committee is notified of a Community approved process for the mass delinking.
5569:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. John is prohibited from reversion of changes which are principally stylistic, except where all style elements are prescribed in the applicable style guideline.
2791:
6221:
request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.
6078:
0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.
2085:
Can anyone provide an estimate of: (i) the percentage of articles within the corpus that have so far been de-linked and (ii) the rough proportion of de-linked articles which have been subsequently reverted?
6053:
4575:
214:
2202:
an encyclopaedia. Removing links while doing other necessary changes on individual articles could not be disruptive, but systematically delinking for aesthetic reasons strikes me as a waste of server time.
1608:
1237:'s conduct, the survey of attitudes there indicated that not only was Tony1's conduct within policy, but his delinking of dates was not disruptive at all. I would like to impress upon the Arbitrators that
681:
1780:
How telling it is that the best Tennis Expert can come up with to support his allegation of edit warring is a complaint that he himself filed, and whose outcome was NOVIO. Strange he didn't mention that.
2818:
6772:
6762:
2069:; the issue pivots around large scale implementation of style changes, and the behavior surrounding the propriety of such changes. I don't think the name change is necessary, but it is acceptable. —
2830:
1665:
like reading mindless shit... turning yet more main body text into a giant blue turd". Reading through some of the archive links provided above by Locke Cole shows my experience was far from unique.
2555:
10.1) Users who disrupt the editing of articles by engaging in sustained aggressive point of view editing may be banned from the affected areas. In extreme cases, they may be banned from the site.
2399:
2106:
My estimation is very rough and is based on feeling rather than actual data: Perhaps 30 % of all articles with dates were forcibly delinked. Probably in less than 1 % the links were re-introduced.
6141:
4609:
4606:
4588:
4585:
4504:
4460:
4420:
4370:
4367:
4328:
4325:
4307:
4304:
4250:
4201:
4198:
4166:
4134:
4023:
3858:
3855:
3852:
3815:
3577:
3574:
3497:
3479:
3464:
3461:
3438:
3404:
3401:
3272:
3269:
3164:
3079:
3018:
2835:
1348:
1075:
195:
188:
6270:
Log any block, restriction, ban or extension under any remedy in this decision here. Minimum information includes name of administrator, date and time, what was done and the basis for doing it.
1814:
1668:
It is my concern, both as an editor with an opinion in this debate, and an administrator watching the situation, that the behavior of several individuals in this area equates to no less than an
1309:
dates off some 8,600 articles as at today's date, and have received only about ten complaints, most of which have nothing to do with the principle of removing dates. One notable complaint was
1074:. The end result, of course, is to reestablish links to articles that for the most part have nothing to do with sports. This is contrary to not only the general consensus of the RfCs, but also
973:"smarter" approach to linking and for the removal of date autoformatting. Waiting it out, I suspect, has been on our minds for some time, and is probably the natural and wiki-ish thing to do.
7024:
8) Lightmouse is limited to using only the account "Lightmouse" to edit. He may also use a separate bot account for any bot task or group of related tasks approved by the bot approvals group.
1149:
of the dispute to conform to expected conducted on Knowledge (XXG). I think this is germane to the dispute’s origins and believe any reasonable interpretation of the RfCs will bear this out.
868:
will not make editorial statements or decisions about how articles should read ("content decisions"). Please do not ask the committee to make these kinds of decisions, as they will not do so.
789:. Specifically those running automated or semi-automated tools to force their preferred version on the rest of us, but also the uncivil behavior of those participating in the discussions. —
2998:. In conjunction with blind reverts, bot and script bugs, and articles being delinked multiple times, the mass delinking contributed to the tension of the dispute and was self-defeating.
6834:
5853:
2127:
I agree that the issue for ArbCom here is behavioural: whether large-scale implementation was premature and whether consensus was sufficiently established for such a profound change. --
609:
3017:
occurred across the breadth of the project, usually consisting of one regular contributor to an article pitted against a well-coordinated team of MOS enforcers and their automations.
2952:" (a "sea of blue"). This bug is more relevant to wiki projects other than Knowledge (XXG), especially where the project has little need for "month day" pages, or even "year" pages.
3628:) on November 11, 2008 with the express purpose of using it for date delinking. It performed 9307 edits without BAG approval until January 30, 2009 when it was indefinitely blocked.
4110:
4055:
3998:
3957:
3893:
3796:
3580:
3520:
3476:
3435:
3432:
3085:
3687:
The March 2009 block evasion included reverting users involved in this date debate, and he subsequently initiated Arbitration Enforcement against the same users he had reverted.
1233:. Second, Locke's point of incivility does not seem well-supported. The one instance in which inciviliy was considered a major problem, when a situation culminated in an RFC on
1867:
Comment. Courtesy archive links for examples of WT:MOSNUM and noticeboard discussions would be appreciated, particularly for discussions leading up to and following the RfCs.
2273:
pending what the name will be. I support just keeping it to the date delinking conduct issues; if we widen the scope it could be dangerous, so I oppose a rename at this time.
1003:
article. I have a practice of my own that is fully in compliance with MOSNUM as well as with the current community consensus according the latest RfCs. Note the beginning
3169:
1837:
3268:
14) Lightbot has passed over articles multiple times. When errors in the first pass have been corrected by others, subsequent passes have repeated the original error.
5842:
Locke Cole remains subject to an editing restriction for 12 months (until June 14, 2010), under which he is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
3190:
1276:, and would ask Arbcom to take this case because it is undoubtedly a behavioural issue stemming from a small group of individuals' inability to accept valid consensus.
1394:
There seems to be a misconception by a couple of arbitrators that the above account is a bot. I am the operator of this account. I believe it has been made clear that
6413:
for a period of two weeks for violation of the temporary injunction, and evading the above-noted 72-hour block with IP addresses to violate the temporary injunction.
3250:
3213:
2810:
2591:
1833:
7015:
7.1) Lightmouse is indefinitely prohibited from using any automation whatsoever on Knowledge (XXG) except for a bot task or group of related tasks authorized by the
4627:
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
2193:
proposal. I don't think I have prejudged this case but if seriously asked to recuse on these grounds by a party to an accepted case then I would be bound to accede.
1304:, whereas the plaintiff is on record as not only opposing consensus on the issue (as borne out by the RfCs closed 25 December 2008), but also quoted as saying that
1053:
931:
I believe the Committee may face a difficult task in defining exactly what it should arbitrate on in relation to this application. These comments may be relevant.
736:
If accepted I would request that the committee pass a motion stopping all automated or semi-automated edits of this fashion until the conclusion of arbitration. —
701:
fait accompli or to exhaust their ability to contest the change. This applies to many editors making a few edits each, as well as a few editors making many edits.
6778:
2346:
1) The purpose of Knowledge (XXG) is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors.
1368:) is under consideration strikes me as being reckless and in contempt of process at worst; at best, I consider it unwise. I contend that this would put Locke's
6754:
6241:
6130:
6085:
1056:. It is a convenient portal as it contains links to the RfCs themselves. These RfCs also remind us of a central consideration to resolved here in arbitration:
5123:
23.2) Kotniski is topic banned for three months from style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates, and any related discussions.
2742:. Deriding the developers, who are in short supply, is not acceptable; they are volunteers, and may have priorities other than fixing non-critical problems.
2646:
accompli or to exhaust their ability to contest the change. This applies to many editors making a few edits each, as well as a few editors making many edits.
1293:
over the most trivial issue of a pair of square brackets, using all the bureaucratic means at his disposal. I do confess to having given some best efforts to
2229:
a case strictly limited to the use of automated or semiautomated tools to delink dates on articles but nothing wider. The caveat about recusal still stands.
1230:
5647:
31.1) Pmanderson is topic banned for 12 month from style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates, and any related discussions.
1044:
think I can be of assistance here by offering this observation: Towards resolving this dispute, arbitrators need a convenient and succinct way to establish
5280:
2210:" mentioned in the title of the principle. Second, if we were to accept the case, the committee cannot issue binding policy on the issues within the RFCs.
633:
5839:
Locke Cole remains indefinitely topic-banned from style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates, and any related discussions.
5662:
32) Locke Cole is topic banned indefinitely from style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates, and any related discussions.
3194:
2198:
That being said, I am concerned at the time spent by a small number of editors who have been mass delinking - which cannot truly, I think, be regarded as
1034:
5884:
4686:
6) Lightmouse is topic banned indefinitely from style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates, and any related discussions.
3239:
2910:
conflicting interpretations of the discussion results. The contentious development and results of the December RfCs are reflective of this environment.
2509:
American spelling to British spelling if the article concerned a British subject. Revert warring over optional styles is unacceptable; if the article is
2300:
2283:
2265:
2219:
2101:
2057:
2027:
1949:
1876:
1823:
1623:
3597:
28) Ohconfucius has informed users that in an attempt to speed up the process of date delinking, he has operated multiple instances of AutoWikiBrowser.
6537:
6134:
5990:
37) Kendrick7 is topic banned 12 months from style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates, and any related discussions.
5218:
4915:
Ohconfucius is topic banned indefinitely from style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates, and any related discussions.
4836:
13) Greg L is topic banned indefinitely from style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates, and any related discussions.
2786:
1) The longstanding dispute in this case is a disagreement between two groups of editors on the issue of linking dates. It encompasses the MediaWiki
1661:: "the puke you expect our articles should be linking to... just because you can prove you can stomach through reading that shit will only prove that
1479:
dates should be linked (opinions differ from only the most important, which bring huge additional value, to all dates), there is clear consensus that
6758:
2470:
5466:
5027:
1810:
483:
676:
5767:
5695:
531:
387:
243:
7068:
1563:
Delinking still continues and despite the effort of Dabomb87, Lightmouse and others, millions of articles cannot be delinked in few months time.
671:
6828:. The Committee thanks the participants for their efforts and encourages them to continue with their constructive work and consensus building.
1611:, as at the time I found the size of the discussion overwhelming, in addition to not having had any stake in the matter from prior experience.
5342:
3728:
2473:. Revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique.
1991:, largely per Vassyana and suggest renaming to MOSNUM due to larger issues. Date delinking is only the latest incarnation of MOSNUM problems.
1806:
187:), and serve as opening statements; as such, they should not be altered. Any evidence you wish to provide to the Arbitrators should go on the
6975:
is limited to using only the account "Ohconfucius" to edit. He may also use a separate bot account for any bot task or tasks approved by the
5156:
1095:
sections. Hand-restoring a relatively small number of links is a good opportunity for editors to avail themselves of these other techniques.
435:
2763:
920:
Much of what I was going to add about the substantive allegations in the statements by the filers and their associates has been clinched in
210:
184:
17:
6504:
6378:
5404:
5274:
3994:
3740:
627:
2843:
2595:
2533:
1352:
3325:
16) In an attempt to speed up the process of date delinking, Lightmouse has operated multiple instances of AutoWikiBrowser concurrently.
6312:
5878:
4869:
4416:
3758:
3746:
3674:
3625:
3075:
339:
6017:
5946:
5212:
4792:
4539:
3944:
3734:
1453:. The only other way I can see of ensuring no disputes on such matters in future would be to replace it with directives from the top.
291:
5247:
is subject to an editing restriction for three months. 2008Olympian is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
6937:
6406:
6350:
6284:
5603:
5540:
5460:
5309:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. Colonies Chris is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
5021:
4162:
3752:
3688:
1145:
precious little admiration for this sort of behavior. There seems to be a pattern here regarding the willingness of notable editors
477:
5913:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. Tennis expert is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
4759:
9.3) Tony1 is indefinitely prohibited from editing any style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates.
2678:
1752:
to get me, Lightmouse and others banned from using AWB to make these edits; then he lost two RFCs, and made spurious complaints at
2925:
5) Deprecation of autoformatting and date-delinking have been problematically conflated in this dispute. While both sides of the
6868:
6700:
6636:
6610:
6029:
5822:
5761:
5689:
5056:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. Ohconfucius is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
4551:
4300:
4234:
3146:
2929:
have conflated the issues, consensus for the deprecation of autoformatting has been abused as consensus for mass date delinking.
950:
for the changes would create a very difficult task for ArbCom. While I can see why Arb. Davies hints at this scope, producing an
848:
825:
798:
772:
745:
723:
525:
381:
237:
198:. That page may also be used for general comments on the evidence. Arbitrators will then vote on a final decision in the case at
5724:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. Locke Cole is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
2379:
6564:
6047:
6035:
5371:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. SkyWalker is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
5336:
4569:
4557:
4500:
4388:
4051:
3698:
3647:
3132:
3118:
1445:
With all due respect to the excellent technical efforts of Kotniski, his sage advice and his in my view correct reading of the
1347:
Not happy with the state of disruption he and his cohorts have sown in WP, a battle appears to have erupted over the merger of
6445:
5185:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. Dabomb87 is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
2490:
2458:
1817:
appears to be the most recent discussion, and problems with the automated edits were raised. Have those problems been fixed?
6882:
6437:
6023:
5150:
5101:
4545:
3886:
3848:
3231:
3160:
2465:, and for helping the debate move to better approaches by discussing their differences rationally. Edit-warring, whether by
2261:
429:
6703:) restriction re-widened to include the pages and talk pages of all MOS and style guidelines due to continuing disruption.
4898:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. Greg L is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
2540:. Over-rigid or over-zealous implementation can be more disruptive than the behaviour that they are intended to discourage.
2403:
2387:
1159:
by Colonies Chris. Notwithstanding that it is a hearty dose of plain-speak, I believe it all to be true and highly relevant.
955:
the iceberg. I note Arb. Blacketer's comment that "the committee cannot issue binding policy on the issues within the RFCs".
4821:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. Tony1 is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
3044:
3031:
3029:
3027:
3025:
3023:
3021:
2895:
3.2) Two RFCs held in December 2008 reaffirmed that the current date autoformatting functionality is undesirable, and that
2711:
6531:
6041:
5398:
4563:
4106:
1080:
relevant connections to the subject of another article that will help readers to understand the current article more fully
864:(1) The filing party begins by stating that "This has been an ongoing content dispute". Yet the lead clearly states that:
4419:) has edit-warred extensively to restore linking of dates, primarily on the tennis articles, but also on other articles.
3954:
On the 15th, 2008Olympian excessively edit-warred for a few days on tennis articles and other ongoing related edit-wars.
2968:) to add Cascading Stylesheet and Javascript control to all autoformatted dates, such as presenting them as normal text (
2461:, rather than through disruptive editing. Editors are each responsible for noticing when a debate is escalating into an
6767:
6662:
6329:
5298:
4863:
3185:
12) Bobblewik was a very prolific editor from March 2004 to October 2006 (65,000+ edits), who was blocked over 17 times
651:
333:
5975:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. He is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
5495:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. He is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
5433:
is subject to an editing restriction for 12 months. He is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
2991:
2707:
2571:
1959:
1676:
on style across articles on a vast scale in the absence of any policy requirement for it or even widespread consensus.
1634:(roughly 55) agreeing with the proposal that "Year links should be made in certain cases". This is not a consensus for
1033:
on WT:MOSNUM to ‘newcomer’ editors concerned about date de‑linking after seeing Lightbot activity affect them, I wrote
963:
886:
6467:
5940:
5902:
4786:
4456:
3358:
2973:
2969:
966:
produced convincing consensus that special consensus is unnecessary for bots to assist in compliance with styleguides.
885:(4) I submit that the filing party's construction of consensus in this context is not a balanced view. In particular,
785:
I'm not asking the committee to decide the content dispute, I'm asking the committee to look at the behavior of those
285:
3078:) almost exclusively pushing back repeatedly with 751 reverts. As a result, the battle become excessively personal.
1748:
I’ll divide my statement into two parts; my opinion, and some facts about the community reaction to date delinking.
6145:
5597:
5534:
5286:
5236:
4194:
3722:
639:
4426:
3082:
2839:
1221:
for a more detailed breakdown). Besides the RFCs, examples of this consensus against delinking dates exist in our
6205:(i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or
5890:
5484:
5045:
3279:
1615:
573:
501:
2829:
on November 20, 2008, and has been protected from editing due to the unresolved dispute since November 18, 2008.
6710:
6685:
6647:
6621:
6593:
6586:
6569:
6527:
6522:
6498:
6489:
6452:
6422:
6391:
6372:
6363:
6335:
6315:) blocked indefinitely for violation of the temporary injunction. This is an alternate account of Ohconfucius.
6297:
6176:
prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" below).
5785:
5713:
5268:
5224:
3988:
2469:
or otherwise, is prohibited; this is so even when the disputed content is clearly problematic, with only a few
2238:
2165:
2142:
2113:
2073:
2043:
2010:
1981:
1907:
1890:
1860:
1846:
1735:
1701:
1594:
1570:
1546:
1462:
1432:
1381:
1336:
1259:
1199:
986:
903:
851:
828:
801:
775:
748:
726:
621:
549:
405:
261:
5836:, his full editing ban will be reinstated for the remainder of its original duration, until December 14, 2009.
3036:
2926:
2814:
2537:
1673:
1650:
6470:) blocked for violation of the temporary injunction until such time as he agrees to stop mass delinking, per
6513:
6306:
5872:
5472:
5360:
5033:
4410:
3668:
3619:
3069:
2739:
2234:
2215:
1048:
regarding the current community consensus on linking and related bot activity. Arbitrators should know that
585:
489:
4581:
2395:
6889:. "Automation" is to be interpreted broadly to refer to any automated or semi-automated tools whatsoever.
6011:
5773:
5701:
5206:
5174:
4533:
3938:
603:
591:
537:
453:
393:
249:
2599:
2466:
2454:
1925:
to double check that. While the issue of date delinking is roughly 6 months old, other issues related to
1446:
1243:
6931:
6400:
6344:
6278:
6180:
Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped.
5454:
5422:
5348:
5015:
4156:
3814:
32) The Rambling Man has edit-warred extensively to remove the linking of dates on the tennis articles.
3717:
1626:
to suspend the bot's blanket removal of year links until consensus for such an action was demonstrated.
1458:
1428:
1377:
1332:
579:
471:
2949:
2896:
2462:
2391:
2383:
1511:
194:
Arbitrators, the parties, and other editors may suggest proposed principles, findings, and remedies at
128:
5449:
4152:
6862:
6694:
6630:
6604:
6600:
5816:
5812:
5755:
5750:
5683:
5678:
5162:
4887:
4294:
4290:
4228:
3140:
2734:
2457:. This is done through the use of polite discussion—involving the wider community, if necessary—and
2296:
1406:
on the Userpage. Before AWB approval was gained, reliance was put on multi-windowed functionality of
1277:
844:
840:
821:
817:
794:
790:
768:
764:
741:
737:
719:
715:
689:
597:
519:
441:
375:
357:
231:
226:
2622:
1315:
6579:
6562:
6549:
6494:
6386:
6368:
6358:
6292:
6058:
is admonished for threatening to use his administrator tools to advance his position in a dispute.
5964:
5410:
5330:
5263:
5091:
4810:
4494:
4045:
3984:
3838:
3126:
3112:
2899:
of dates is not desirable; however, consensus has not been found on when dates should be delinked.
1742:
1507:
1439:
1356:
1152:
BTW, I want to specifically draw attention to and endorse the statements of the following editors:
616:
309:
3061:
2990:
7) Despite the ongoing dispute, mass date delinking has been conducted by many users via scripts,
2787:
1926:
1305:
1301:
1286:
707:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_arbitration/Episodes_and_characters_2/Proposed_decision#Fait_accompli
6876:
6431:
6302:
5867:
5621:
5558:
5144:
5095:
4875:
4406:
3880:
3842:
3664:
3643:
3633:
3615:
3225:
3154:
3065:
2965:
2255:
2230:
2211:
2040:
2024:
1918:
1903:
1886:
1872:
1802:
1388:
1255:
1049:
423:
345:
1360:
1285:. This subject/guideline may have the dubious honour of having the record number of attempts to
1273:
3682:, and again in March 2009 when blocked for violating an injunction intended to stop the battle.
2961:
6707:
6006:
5952:
5392:
5201:
4798:
4703:
Lightmouse is indefinitely prohibited from using any automation whatsoever on Knowledge (XXG).
4528:
4100:
3934:
2250:
I am a good friend of Tony and my ability to be impartial may not be accepted by all. Cheers,
2151:
2128:
2087:
1553:
1535:. This is quite disrupting in continuation to work for the Knowledge (XXG) which I started in
1403:
1082:. Said another way, links should be germane and topical to the subject matter of the article.
1063:
297:
2945:
2621:
are processes that modify Knowledge (XXG) content in a fully or partially automated fashion.
2618:
1706:
Additional: I am becoming more and more concerned with the behavior of Greg L. Edits such as
1450:
1294:
1058:
is bot activity (or planned bot activity) in accordance with the current community consensus?
6972:
6927:
6656:
6418:
6396:
6340:
6323:
6274:
5609:
5546:
5010:
4857:
3948:
2536:
exist to facilitate the smooth running of the project. However, they should be applied with
2003:
1974:
1942:
1798:
1654:
1454:
1424:
1412:
1373:
1328:
1266:
1194:
466:
327:
7016:
6976:
6886:
6821:
5833:
4653:
3217:
2627:
1922:
1753:
1669:
1523:
1399:
1369:
1290:
1282:
6858:
6690:
6626:
6461:
6169:
No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without:
5934:
4780:
4450:
4224:
3352:
3136:
2960:
resolved this bug by creating parser function "formatdate", and at the same time resolved
2292:
2182:
2109:
1590:
1566:
1542:
1469:
1015:
1011:
981:
898:
514:
370:
279:
6471:
5105:
5072:
4387:
47.5) Locke Cole has an extensive record of disruptive behavior spanning multiple years (
3014:
1247:
1226:
1222:
2630:
is generally required before an editor may use a bot for automatic or high-speed edits.
1672:
issue over the whole site, by using automated or semi-automated tools to forcibly apply
6676:
6553:
6480:
6449:
5591:
5528:
5325:
4490:
4188:
4041:
3122:
3108:
2851:. However, this resulted in further disputes on these pages, requiring page protection
2274:
1420:
1416:
1229:, where the delinking of dates was accepted without any form of resistance, as well as
1071:
209:
as needed, but this page should not be edited otherwise. Please raise any questions at
6816:
fulfills the requirement for "a Community approved process for the mass delinking" in
7062:
6872:
6644:
6618:
6427:
5139:
3876:
3221:
3150:
2699:
2251:
2037:
2021:
1899:
1882:
1868:
1829:
1720:
1686:
1642:
1619:
1557:
1530:
1251:
1206:
812:
760:
567:
418:
1618:
regarding the repeated removal of a single year link from the lede of an article by
6575:
5387:
4096:
3663:
30) Ohconfucius has unlinked dates while evading blocks in November 2008 using the
2575:
Style, although it is not policy and editors may deviate from it with good reason.
4944:
Ohconfucius is prohibited from using any automation in article space indefinitely.
4605:
52) Arthur Rubin has edit warred on the project pages related to the date debate.
3552:
25) Ohconfucius has edit warred on the project pages related to the date debate.
1079:
6652:
6414:
6317:
4852:
4324:
46) Locke Cole has edit warred on the project pages related to the date debate.
4267:
44) Pmanderson has edit warred on the project pages related to the date debate.
2957:
1994:
1965:
1933:
1856:
1842:
1819:
1658:
1300:
In addition to creating and expanding articles, I am interested in carrying out
1189:
996:
322:
5829:
Locke Cole is provisionally unbanned effective at the enactment of this motion.
4503:) has edit warred extensively on the project pages related to the date debate.
3769:
has made comments intended to encourage a contributor to return to retirement.(
3697:
In addition, Ohconfucius was blocked for evading the Arbitration injunction in
2948:
was raised in January 2006 to allow dates to be autoformatted without causing "
2762:
pages), should be thoroughly discussed with the technical team, at venues like
2715:
6457:
5929:
4775:
4446:
3348:
2822:
2517:, it would be wrong to switch simply to change styles as both are acceptable.
2070:
2054:
1809:
is a redlink. Has there been any communal approval of this bot? Very few of
1577:
1339:(reworked from edits 15:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC) and 01:12, 11 January 2009)
1234:
974:
891:
858:
274:
1272:
I would respectfully disagree with those who have said this has been largely
5586:
5523:
4184:
3519:
24) Ohconfucius has been incivil in their communication with other editors.
3496:
23) Greg L has edit warred on the project pages related to the date debate.
7045:
discussion of policies and guidelines, and the use of alternate accounts.
4580:
has threatened to use administrative tools in a dispute in which he was an
3947:) first became involved in the tennis articles by removing date links from
3400:
19) Tony1 has edit warred on the project pages related to the date debate.
3149:) which have a block log relevant to the community approval of bot account
6211:
is required. If consensus at AE or AN is unclear, the status quo prevails.
6820:
and the requirement for "ate delinking bots in a manner approved by the
6173:
the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or
4671:
5.1) Lightmouse is banned from Knowledge (XXG) for a period of one year.
3636:
unlinked years even when the year was a primary component of the subject.
2718:, each having their own processes and customs which should be respected.
1715:
1681:
1601:
1019:
1004:
562:
6940:) is permitted to use automation subject to normal community guidelines.
3064:
to delinking dates on tennis articles commenced in September 2008, with
1646:
editor to make another feel unwelcome in participating in this fashion.
6996:
4994:
4985:
4973:
Ohconfucius is limited to using only the account "Ohconfucius" to edit.
4927:
1407:
1217:
consensus against most, if not all, dates being linked (see my comment
116:
98:
6126:
ask the enforcing administrator to reconsider their original decision;
4744:
4715:
107:
5825:) from editing Knowledge (XXG) for six months is amended as follows:
4732:
Lightmouse is limited to using only the account "Lightmouse" to edit.
2510:
1499:
6511:
for a period of 48 hours for violation of the temporary injunction.
6385:
for a period of 24 hours for violation of the temporary injunction.
6357:
for a period of 72 hours for violation of the temporary injunction.
6291:
for a period of 48 hours for violation of the temporary injunction.
6144:. If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by email through
3962:
2008Olympian occasionally participated in the edit-wars afterwards.
3889:) has edit-warred extensively with respect to the linking of dates.
3460:
22) Greg L has been incivil in his communication with other editors.
682:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Date Linking RFC
4956:
215:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement
211:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration#Requests for clarification
89:
6763:
Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/Full-date unlinking bot
5637:
Passed 7 to 0 (with 2 abstentions) at 10:53, 02 August 2009 (UTC).
4652:
2.1) Date delinking bots will perform in a manner approved by the
2733:
20.1) The software used by the English Knowledge (XXG) project is
2514:
1962:, it's using AWB on an alternate account, which is within policy.
1836:, but this "solitary year unlinking" functionality was covered by
1657:
and greeted with a torrent of aggressive language and swearing by
1103:
to this complaint. Tony and Lightmouse have exemplary block logs (
80:
62:
5729:
Passed 11 to 0 (with 2 abstentions) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5190:
Passed 10 to 1 (with 2 abstentions) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4691:
Passed 11 to 0 (with 2 abstentions) at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4616:
Passed 11 to 0 (with 2 abstentions) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3445:
Passed 11 to 0 (with 2 abstentions) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3414:
Passed 11 to 0 (with 2 abstentions) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3390:
Passed 11 to 0 (with 2 abstentions) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2825:
by the community. This page in the manual of style was taken to
6063:
Passed 11 to 1 (with 1 abstention) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5667:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5652:
Passed 8 to 1 (with 2 abstentions) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5575:
Passed 9 to 1 (with 3 abstentions) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5376:
Passed 9 to 1 (with 2 abstentions) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5314:
Passed 10 to 1 (with 1 abstention) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5252:
Passed 9 to 2 (with 2 abstentions) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5113:
Passed 6 to 4 (with 3 abstentions) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5080:
Passed 6 to 5 (with 2 abstentions) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5071:
20) The Rambling Man is admonished for not pursuing appropriate
5061:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4921:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4903:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4826:
Passed 9 to 2 (with 2 abstentions) at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4764:
Passed 9 to 2 (with 2 abstentions) at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4709:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4595:
Passed 11 to 1 (with 1 abstention) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4517:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4479:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4395:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4257:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4208:
Passed 8 to 1 (with 4 abstentions) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3923:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3851:) has edit warred on project pages related to the date debate.
3822:
Passed 11 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3804:
Passed 6 to 5 (with 2 abstentions) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3332:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3220:
for a new bot "Cleanbot" (account not created, and unrelated to
2934:
Passed 7 to 2 (with 3 abstentions) at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2836:
Knowledge (XXG):Only make links that are relevant to the context
2771:
Passed 7 to 2 (with 4 abstentions) at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2723:
Passed 7 to 1 (with 5 abstentions) at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2560:
Passed 10 to 1 (with 1 abstention) at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2545:
Passed 11 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2522:
Passed 12 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2443:
Passed 8 to 2 (with 3 abstentions) at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
1536:
1503:
1398:. Edits made using the account at present rely predominantly on
1349:
Knowledge (XXG):Only make links that are relevant to the context
5980:
Passed 9 to 1 (with 1 abstention) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5632:
is admonished for edit-warring to remove the linking of dates.
5500:
Passed 9 to 1 (with 1 abstention) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5438:
Passed 8 to 4 (with 1 abstention) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5128:
Passed 8 to 4 (with 1 abstention) at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4661:
Passed 9 to 0 (with 1 abstention) at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
6242:
procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision
4366:
47) Locke Cole has edit-warred on a large number of articles.
3997:) has edit-warred extensively to remove the linking of dates.
3593:
Ohconfucius has operated multiple instances of AutoWikiBrowser
938:
There appears little that ArbCom would want to do concerning
6665:) blocked for 48 h for violating his editing restriction at
876:
On this basis, I submit that the application be dismissed.
5796:
is banned from Knowledge (XXG) for a period of six months.
3361:) has been incivil in his communication with other editors.
2846:
occurred on January 11, 2009, stabilising the following day
1813:
mentions appear to be venues of broad community approval.
1176:“Comment from vaguely-involved User (from the original RfA)
873:
compromises which don't involve automated date delinking."
811:
The overall goal of this, for me anyways, is to remove the
759:
incivility and the mass unlinking by automated means (the "
6244:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
6088:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
5832:
Should Locke Cole be blocked as a result of violating the
2813:
has been disputed on various forums since a straw poll at
206:
6885:) account for a single automation task authorized by the
2994:, and bots, hindering dispute resolution and encouraging
2592:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Dates
1807:
Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/Date delinker
7051:
7031:
7011:
Remedies 7.1 and 8 are amended to read the following:
6987:
6947:
6896:
6808:
6800:
6792:
6784:
6741:
6704:
6670:
6666:
6541:
6508:
6475:
6441:
6410:
6382:
6354:
6288:
5970:
5958:
5908:
5896:
5791:
5779:
5719:
5707:
5627:
5615:
5564:
5552:
5490:
5478:
5428:
5416:
5366:
5354:
5304:
5292:
5242:
5230:
5180:
5168:
5051:
5039:
4893:
4881:
4816:
4804:
4511:
4509:
4507:
4472:
4469:
4466:
4463:
4429:
4349:
4347:
4345:
4343:
4341:
4338:
4336:
4334:
4332:
4268:
4247:
4244:
4241:
4238:
4131:
4129:
4127:
4125:
4122:
4120:
4118:
4116:
4114:
4078:
4076:
4073:
4071:
4068:
4066:
4063:
4061:
4059:
4020:
4018:
4016:
4013:
4011:
4009:
4006:
4004:
4002:
3967:
3965:
3963:
3955:
3952:
3916:
3914:
3912:
3910:
3908:
3905:
3903:
3901:
3899:
3897:
3890:
3792:
3789:
3785:
3781:
3777:
3773:
3770:
3683:
3680:
3678:
3639:
3637:
3629:
3598:
3553:
3535:
3532:
3529:
3526:
3523:
3473:
3470:
3467:
3429:
3407:
3383:
3380:
3377:
3374:
3371:
3368:
3365:
3362:
3326:
3309:
3307:
3305:
3303:
3301:
3275:
3235:
3186:
3167:
3042:
3040:
2877:
2873:
2869:
2865:
2861:
2857:
2854:
2852:
2849:
2847:
2190:
2186:
2178:
1792:
1707:
1533:
1498:
links to dates. If they were successful, articles from
1365:
1320:
1310:
1218:
1180:
1175:
1168:
1162:
1156:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1108:
1104:
1067:
921:
657:
645:
555:
543:
507:
495:
459:
447:
411:
399:
363:
351:
315:
303:
267:
255:
168:
162:
156:
150:
136:
53:
7034:
12 to 0 with 1 recusal at 15:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
6990:
12 to 0 with 1 recusal at 15:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
6950:
7 to 0 with 1 recusal at 14:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
6613:) blocked for 6 months by way of enforcement of the "
2794:, and "DA") and the utility of the linking of dates.
2766:, due to concerns of appropriateness and efficiency.
2594:
can be changed by the Knowledge (XXG) community; see
1838:
Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests_for_approval/Lightbot_2
1793:
Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (8/0/2/0)
1171:
of Ohconfucius, which I find particularly insightful.
3249:
The denied status was reported to the village pump (
2332:, where vote counts and comments are also available.
1529:
Dabomb87 additionally wikistalked me, most recently
1128:
for Aurthur Rubin. Lock Cole’s attempt to “archive”
1052:
has produced a nice summary of the relevant RfCs at
6639:) blocked for 1 year by way of enforcement of the "
3214:
Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests_for_approval/Cleanbot
2811:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style (dates and numbers)
1834:
Knowledge (XXG):Bots/Requests for approval/Lightbot
7040:Supplemental motion regarding User Ohconfucius (3)
6956:Supplemental motion regarding User Ohconfucius (2)
4197:) has edit-warred to remove the linking of dates.
4165:) has edit-warred to remove the linking of dates.
4109:) has edit-warred to remove the linking of dates.
4054:) has edit-warred to remove the linking of dates.
3216:on October 19, 2008, requesting approval from the
2682:judgment may result in the removal of BAG status.
1364:WP:MOSNUM arbitration request was being prepared (
7007:Supplemental motion regarding User Lightmouse (2)
2602:by those users who are familiar with the matter.
922:the more recent statement below by Colonies Chris
6759:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Full-date unlinking bot#RFC
6755:Knowledge (XXG):Date formatting and linking poll
6086:procedure for the standard enforcement provision
4601:Arthur Rubin has edit-warred on style guidelines
3951:on November 12, 2008 during an ongoing edit war.
205:Once the case is closed, editors may add to the
4459:) has edit-warred to restore linking of dates.
3548:Ohconfucius has edit warred on style guidelines
698:
6905:Supplemental motion regarding User Ohconfucius
4320:Locke Cole has edit-warred on style guidelines
4263:Pmanderson has edit-warred on style guidelines
3056:Deliberate prolonged battle on tennis articles
2972:), or as another colour to make them stand out
2317:Passed 10 to 0 at 11:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
1054:User:Dabomb87/Summary of the Date Linking RFCs
6961:Remedy 18 is amended to read the following:
6919:Remedy #17 ("Ohconfucius automation") of the
6843:Supplemental motion regarding User Lightmouse
4485:Kendrick7 has edit warred on style guidelines
3973:Passed 12 to 1 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
1132:Tony’s extraordinarily well-participated RfC
8:
6552:that he was in violation of the injunction.
6208:(ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA
5918:Passed 11 to 1 at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5801:Passed 12 to 1 at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4979:Passed 13 to 0 at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4950:Passed 13 to 0 at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4841:Passed 12 to 1 at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4738:Passed 13 to 0 at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4676:Passed 10 to 3 at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4642:Passed 10 to 0 at 18:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4435:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4377:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4356:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4314:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4274:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4173:Passed 12 to 1 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4141:Passed 10 to 3 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4085:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
4030:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3865:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3833:Kotniski has edit warred on style guidelines
3706:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3659:Ohconfucius has battled while evading blocks
3653:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3614:29) Ohconfucius created alternative account
3604:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3587:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3573:date links from a large number of articles.
3559:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3542:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3504:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3486:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3321:Lightmouse has run multiple instances of AWB
3315:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3286:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3258:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3202:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3175:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3092:Passed 12 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3050:Passed 12 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3003:Passed 12 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2980:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2904:Passed 12 to 1 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2885:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2799:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2747:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2687:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2667:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2651:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2635:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2607:Passed 12 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2586:Changing a guideline such as Manual of Style
2580:Passed 11 to 1 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2498:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2478:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2427:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2411:Passed 12 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2367:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2351:Passed 13 to 0 at 16:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2185:on this issue, and participated in both the
1960:Wikipedia_talk:Bot_policy#User:Date_delinker
6260:Passed 8 to 2 at 19:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
5995:Passed 7 to 3 at 19:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
3810:The Rambling Man has edit warred on content
3428:date links from a large number of articles.
2915:Passed 7 to 0 at 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
2821:resulted in dynamic dates being considered
677:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Greg L
6926:is terminated, effective immediately, and
6722:Scope of topic bans and other restrictions
6098:
5856:, 7 to 1 at 03:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC).
5510:
3677:) alternate account during a 24 hour block
3569:26) Ohconfucius has edit-warred to remove
3492:Greg L has edit warred on style guidelines
3238:on October 21, 2008, and was mentioned on
3234:)) to delink dates. It was advertised on
3035:Complaints and questions were directed to
2866:Template:Wikipedia_policies_and_guidelines
1917:. I also can not find anything indicating
1124:for the filing party, Locke Cole, nor the
1076:this portion of WP:Manual of Style (links)
807:Limited response to Arthur Rubin and Masem
672:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Tony1
71:
5744:superseded by motion, see directly below.
3396:Tony1 has edit warred on style guidelines
3296:15) Lightmouse has edit-warred to remove
2964:(a feature request initially proposed in
6825:
6817:
2764:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (technical)
2177:. In the interests of full disclosure I
1828:I also notice that the last 10 edits by
958:Several Arbitrators are concerned about
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration
6899:8 to 0 at 13:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
6544:for continuing even after being warned
6146:Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee
2844:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style (links)
1721:
1687:
1653:, I was accused of "forum shopping" by
1353:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style (links)
213:, and report violations of remedies at
6857:Nonwithstanding remedies #7.1 and #8,
6837:5 to 1 at 10:24, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
6640:
6614:
6225:functionary blocks of whatever nature.
3565:Ohconfucius has edit warred on content
2753:Deprecation of MediaWiki functionality
2596:the policy on how policies are decided
2378:disrepute. Unseemly conduct, such as
1854:with a tight scope of date delinking.
1522:, the only proper way for doing so is
1134:after it had been up for only 14 hours
207:#Log of blocks, bans, and restrictions
6744:6 to 1 at 03:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
6266:Log of blocks, bans, and restrictions
4362:Locke Cole has edit warred on content
3292:Lightmouse has edit warred on content
3135:) are former undisclosed accounts of
2453:6) Knowledge (XXG) works by building
1832:are outside of the approval given at
1624:requested Lightmouse on his talk page
7:
7054:8 to 5 16:23, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
6574:Later CU-blocked as a sockpuppet of
6255:that has broad community consensus.
6148:(or, if email access is revoked, to
5104:) is reminded to pursue appropriate
3424:20) Tony1 has edit-warred to remove
2528:Authority of policies and guidelines
1614:A few days ago I became involved in
1587:autoformated, only days and months.
1514:. If they wish delete articles from
1078:, which states that links should be
6444:for 24 hours for testing limits of
6131:arbitration enforcement noticeboard
5807:Motion amending "Locke Cole banned"
1136:(accompanied with the edit summary
1120:passing my “grin test” here is the
6140:submit a request for amendment at
3103:Undisclosed accounts of Lightmouse
2891:RFCs have not resolved the dispute
2489:avail themselves of the available
1921:is an approved bot and have asked
24:
7069:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration cases
6915:case is supplemented as follows:
6853:case is supplemented as follows:
2657:Responsibilities of bot operators
1641:I was only met with a reply from
1183:by Dabomb87. It is quit succinct.
1066:re‑linking month/day dates, like
1035:WP:Why dates should not be linked
982:
975:
929:The problem of scope and purpose.
899:
892:
6999:at 16:28, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
6198:For a request to succeed, either
6152:
4997:at 16:28, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
4930:at 16:28, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
3420:Tony1 has edit warred on content
3236:three relevant discussion boards
1486:Dabomb87, Lightmouse and others
120:on 16:31, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
84:on 13:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
66:on 03:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
6330:
6324:
6318:
6165:Modifications by administrators
4988:at 15:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
4959:at 14:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
4747:at 15:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
4718:at 15:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
3264:Lightbot repeats its own errors
1483:dates should be linked always.
1475:Although there is no consensus
1062:Note that we have editors like
787:involved in the content dispute
111:on 15:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
102:on 15:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
93:on 14:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
75:on 10:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
34:on 23:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
6517:
2152:
2129:
2088:
1609:the recent RfC on year linking
1387:Important statement regarding
1366:it dates from 17 November 2008
57:on 03:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
1:
6514:
6117:Appeals by sanctioned editors
2840:Knowledge (XXG):Build the Web
1037:to help ease the transition.
48:on 10:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
25:
6336:04:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
6298:03:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
6103:0) Appeals and modifications
3515:Ohconfucius has been incivil
3009:One-sided battle on articles
2301:00:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
2284:16:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
2266:04:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
2239:21:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
2220:18:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
2166:02:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
2143:16:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
2114:21:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
2102:15:48, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
2074:17:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
2058:15:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
2044:10:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
2028:14:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
2011:13:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
1982:14:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1950:13:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1908:22:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1891:08:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1877:06:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1861:23:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
1847:11:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1824:06:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1736:21:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1702:18:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1595:11:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1571:11:02, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1547:10:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1463:16:01, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
1433:14:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1382:02:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
1337:04:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
1260:03:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
1200:23:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
1028:article. This is but one of
987:10:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
904:08:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
852:00:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
829:11:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
802:09:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
776:04:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
754:Limited response to Dabomb87
749:03:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
727:03:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
41:on 21:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
6711:14:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
6229:discussed at another venue.
6135:administrators’ noticeboard
6074:Enforcement of restrictions
5067:The Rambling Man admonished
4285:Locke Cole has been incivil
4219:Pmanderson has been incivil
3610:Ohconfucius - Date delinker
2740:building a better mousetrap
1649:When I took my concerns to
7085:
6871:) is permitted to use his
6523:19:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
6453:02:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
3013:8) Due to mass delinking,
2856:, and spread to templates
2590:13.1) A guideline such as
2342:Purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
1302:WP policies and guidelines
148:Watchlist all case pages:
126:
28:
6826:"2.1 Date delinking bots"
6648:23:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
6622:19:26, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
6490:21:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
6423:13:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
6392:21:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
6364:04:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
6153:
6094:Appeals and modifications
5258:Colonies Chris restricted
3039:and/or roundly dismissed.
2600:consensus decision-making
1768:Response to Tennis Expert
1714:unacceptable behavior. —
1607:I did not participate in
1165:and its addendum by Tony.
834:Response to Sam Blacketer
781:Limited response to Tony1
6686:06:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
6594:04:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
6570:23:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
5862:Tennis expert restricted
4909:Ohconfucius topic banned
2613:Role of bots and scripts
2388:assumptions of bad faith
1396:the account is not a bot
946:Trying to determine the
185:Requests for arbitration
6818:"1.3 Mass date linking"
6768:Full-date unlinking bot
6240:In accordance with the
6219:
6084:In accordance with the
6001:Arthur Rubin admonished
5658:Locke Cole topic banned
5643:Pmanderson topic banned
5196:2008Olympian restricted
4682:Lightmouse topic banned
3456:Greg L has been incivil
3212:13) Lightmouse created
3193:and was the subject of
2862:Template:Guideline_list
2805:Style locked in dispute
2534:Policies and guidelines
2433:Edit-warring is harmful
2400:disruptive point-making
2328:All numbering based on
1801:edits in two months by
918:Colonies Chris says it.
6942:
6891:
6129:request review at the
5986:Kendrick7 topic banned
5444:Dudesleeper restricted
5005:Ohconfucius restricted
4938:Ohconfucius automation
4382:
3716:31) Former bureaucrat
3646:was used in edit wars.
3343:Tony1 has been incivil
2966:comment 98 of bug 4582
2858:Template:MoS-guideline
2790:functionality (a.k.a.
1402:- please refer to the
1018:, that I added in the
870:
711:
6917:
6855:
6446:WP:ARBDATE/Injunction
5673:Locke Cole restricted
5119:Kotniski topic banned
4697:Lightmouse automation
3208:Lightmouse - Cleanbot
3181:Bobblewik involvement
2693:System administrators
2598:, which provides for
2357:Means of contributing
2179:made an early comment
1788:Preliminary decisions
1140:was, in my opinion,
970:Throwing out the case
866:
6542:blocked indefinitely
5320:SkyWalker restricted
4967:Ohconfucius accounts
4303:) has been incivil.
4237:) has been incivil.
3240:User_talk:Lightmouse
2921:Conflation of issues
2735:open source software
2307:Temporary injunction
1772:This claim repeated
1576:Limited response to
1552:Limited response to
1438:Limited response to
1231:a preliminary survey
1169:The entire statement
666:Requests for comment
7017:bot approvals group
6977:bot approvals group
6887:Bot Approvals Group
6822:Bot Approvals Group
6750:Date delinking bots
6528:Overweight and ugly
5811:The remedy banning
5134:Dabomb87 restricted
4832:Greg L topic banned
4726:Lightmouse accounts
4654:Bot Approvals Group
4648:Date delinking bots
4632:Mass date delinking
4383:Locke Cole's record
3218:Bot Approvals Group
2792:date autoformatting
2679:Bot Approvals Group
2677:17) Members of the
2673:Bot Approvals Group
2628:Bot Approvals Group
2551:Tendentious editing
1743:User:Colonies Chris
1287:scale the Reischtag
1163:The above statement
6641:#Lightmouse banned
6615:#Locke Cole banned
5382:HJensen restricted
5106:dispute resolution
5073:dispute resolution
4755:Tony1 topic banned
3644:user:Date delinker
3634:user:Date delinker
2956:arbitration case,
2716:meta.wikimedia.org
2491:dispute resolution
2484:Dispute resolution
2459:dispute resolution
2330:/Proposed decision
2150:per my comment. --
1919:User:Date delinker
1803:user:date delinker
1389:User:date delinker
1291:personal dimension
200:/Proposed decision
6717:Amendment motions
6684:
6488:
6334:
6235:
6234:
6133:("AE") or at the
5834:three-revert rule
5735:Locke Cole banned
5582:
5581:
5515:Superseded remedy
5086:Kotniski reminded
4847:Greg L restricted
4667:Lightmouse banned
2449:Editorial process
2406:, is prohibited.
2404:gaming the system
2161:
2157:
2138:
2134:
2097:
2093:
1510:which is against
1404:Mission Statement
1400:Auto Wiki Browser
1250:, to take place.
1223:Featured articles
1016:• 1799 in science
1012:• 1795 in science
180:
179:
175:
7076:
6815:
6814:
6811:
6803:
6795:
6787:
6683:
6681:
6674:
6589:
6560:
6519:
6516:
6487:
6485:
6478:
6389:
6361:
6332:
6326:
6320:
6316:
6295:
6250:Stability review
6159:
6157:
6156:
6155:
6099:
6057:
5974:
5947:deleted contribs
5924:G-Man restricted
5912:
5885:deleted contribs
5795:
5768:deleted contribs
5723:
5696:deleted contribs
5631:
5604:deleted contribs
5568:
5541:deleted contribs
5511:
5494:
5467:deleted contribs
5432:
5405:deleted contribs
5370:
5343:deleted contribs
5308:
5281:deleted contribs
5246:
5219:deleted contribs
5184:
5157:deleted contribs
5055:
5028:deleted contribs
4897:
4870:deleted contribs
4820:
4793:deleted contribs
4770:Tony1 restricted
4579:
3949:Billie Jean King
3790:apology in April
3768:
3718:The Rambling Man
3712:The Rambling Man
2782:Locus of dispute
2777:Findings of fact
2705:
2380:personal attacks
2281:
2187:Date Linking RFC
2163:
2159:
2155:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2112:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2009:
2006:
1980:
1977:
1948:
1945:
1859:
1845:
1822:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1718:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1684:
1593:
1569:
1545:
1413:User:Luna Santin
1267:User:Ohconfucius
1198:
1147:on just one side
1081:
984:
979:
901:
896:
709:
661:
634:deleted contribs
613:
559:
532:deleted contribs
511:
484:deleted contribs
463:
436:deleted contribs
415:
388:deleted contribs
367:
340:deleted contribs
319:
292:deleted contribs
271:
244:deleted contribs
221:Involved parties
174:
173:
146:
139:
26:
7084:
7083:
7079:
7078:
7077:
7075:
7074:
7073:
7059:
7058:
7042:
7009:
6958:
6907:
6845:
6809:
6801:
6793:
6785:
6770:
6766:
6752:
6724:
6719:
6677:
6675:
6587:
6567:
6554:
6481:
6479:
6387:
6359:
6293:
6268:
6252:
6236:
6192:Important notes
6151:
6149:
6104:
6096:
6076:
6071:
6009:
6003:
5988:
5932:
5926:
5870:
5864:
5809:
5753:
5737:
5681:
5675:
5660:
5645:
5589:
5583:
5526:
5516:
5508:
5506:John restricted
5452:
5446:
5390:
5384:
5328:
5322:
5266:
5260:
5204:
5198:
5142:
5136:
5121:
5088:
5069:
5013:
5007:
4969:
4940:
4911:
4855:
4849:
4834:
4778:
4772:
4757:
4728:
4699:
4684:
4669:
4650:
4634:
4624:
4603:
4531:
4525:
4487:
4443:
4403:
4385:
4364:
4322:
4287:
4282:
4265:
4221:
4216:
4181:
4149:
4093:
4038:
3981:
3931:
3873:
3835:
3830:
3812:
3793:reaction/revert
3720:
3714:
3661:
3612:
3595:
3567:
3550:
3517:
3512:
3494:
3458:
3453:
3422:
3398:
3345:
3340:
3323:
3294:
3266:
3210:
3183:
3105:
3100:
3058:
3011:
2988:
2942:
2923:
2893:
2807:
2788:"dynamic dates"
2784:
2779:
2755:
2731:
2704:#wikimedia-tech
2703:
2695:
2675:
2659:
2643:
2615:
2588:
2572:Manual of Style
2568:
2566:Manual of Style
2553:
2530:
2506:
2504:Optional styles
2486:
2451:
2435:
2419:
2375:
2359:
2344:
2339:
2325:
2309:
2275:
2107:
2004:
1992:
1975:
1963:
1943:
1931:
1857:John Vandenberg
1855:
1843:John Vandenberg
1841:
1820:John Vandenberg
1818:
1795:
1790:
1746:
1741:Statement from
1730:
1726:
1722:
1716:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1682:
1638:point of view.
1605:
1600:Statement from
1588:
1564:
1540:
1490:this consensus
1473:
1372:into question.
1359:, and the most
1278:User:Locke Cole
1270:
1265:Statement from
1210:
1187:
1024:section of the
1000:
862:
710:
705:
693:
668:
619:
565:
517:
469:
421:
373:
325:
277:
229:
223:
176:
149:
147:
143:
142:
135:
131:
121:
112:
103:
94:
85:
76:
67:
58:
49:
42:
35:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
7082:
7080:
7072:
7071:
7061:
7060:
7057:
7056:
7041:
7038:
7037:
7036:
7026:
7025:
7021:
7020:
7008:
7005:
7004:
7003:
7002:
7001:
6995:Superseded by
6982:
6981:
6957:
6954:
6953:
6952:
6922:Date delinking
6912:Date delinking
6906:
6903:
6902:
6901:
6850:Date delinking
6844:
6841:
6840:
6839:
6765:indicate that
6751:
6748:
6747:
6746:
6723:
6720:
6718:
6715:
6714:
6713:
6688:
6650:
6624:
6598:
6597:
6596:
6565:
6550:NuclearWarfare
6525:
6495:Colonies Chris
6492:
6455:
6425:
6394:
6369:Colonies Chris
6366:
6338:
6300:
6267:
6264:
6263:
6262:
6251:
6248:
6247:
6246:
6233:
6232:
6231:
6230:
6226:
6222:
6218:
6215:
6214:
6213:
6212:
6209:
6206:
6200:
6199:
6178:
6177:
6174:
6167:
6166:
6162:
6161:
6138:
6127:
6119:
6118:
6106:
6105:
6102:
6097:
6095:
6092:
6091:
6090:
6075:
6072:
6070:
6067:
6066:
6065:
6002:
5999:
5998:
5997:
5987:
5984:
5983:
5982:
5925:
5922:
5921:
5920:
5863:
5860:
5859:
5858:
5848:
5847:
5843:
5840:
5837:
5830:
5808:
5805:
5804:
5803:
5747:
5746:
5736:
5733:
5732:
5731:
5674:
5671:
5670:
5669:
5659:
5656:
5655:
5654:
5644:
5641:
5640:
5639:
5580:
5579:
5578:
5577:
5518:
5517:
5514:
5509:
5507:
5504:
5503:
5502:
5445:
5442:
5441:
5440:
5383:
5380:
5379:
5378:
5321:
5318:
5317:
5316:
5264:Colonies Chris
5259:
5256:
5255:
5254:
5197:
5194:
5193:
5192:
5135:
5132:
5131:
5130:
5120:
5117:
5116:
5115:
5087:
5084:
5083:
5082:
5068:
5065:
5064:
5063:
5006:
5003:
5002:
5001:
5000:
4999:
4993:Superseded by
4990:
4984:Superseded by
4968:
4965:
4964:
4963:
4962:
4961:
4939:
4936:
4935:
4934:
4933:
4932:
4926:Superseded by
4910:
4907:
4906:
4905:
4848:
4845:
4844:
4843:
4833:
4830:
4829:
4828:
4771:
4768:
4767:
4766:
4756:
4753:
4752:
4751:
4750:
4749:
4743:Superseded by
4727:
4724:
4723:
4722:
4721:
4720:
4714:Superseded by
4698:
4695:
4694:
4693:
4683:
4680:
4679:
4678:
4668:
4665:
4664:
4663:
4649:
4646:
4645:
4644:
4633:
4630:
4623:
4620:
4619:
4618:
4602:
4599:
4598:
4597:
4524:
4521:
4520:
4519:
4486:
4483:
4482:
4481:
4442:
4439:
4438:
4437:
4402:
4399:
4398:
4397:
4384:
4381:
4380:
4379:
4363:
4360:
4359:
4358:
4321:
4318:
4317:
4316:
4286:
4283:
4281:
4278:
4277:
4276:
4264:
4261:
4260:
4259:
4220:
4217:
4215:
4212:
4211:
4210:
4180:
4177:
4176:
4175:
4148:
4145:
4144:
4143:
4092:
4089:
4088:
4087:
4037:
4034:
4033:
4032:
3985:Colonies Chris
3980:
3979:Colonies Chris
3977:
3976:
3975:
3930:
3927:
3926:
3925:
3872:
3869:
3868:
3867:
3834:
3831:
3829:
3826:
3825:
3824:
3811:
3808:
3807:
3806:
3713:
3710:
3709:
3708:
3660:
3657:
3656:
3655:
3611:
3608:
3607:
3606:
3594:
3591:
3590:
3589:
3566:
3563:
3562:
3561:
3549:
3546:
3545:
3544:
3516:
3513:
3511:
3508:
3507:
3506:
3493:
3490:
3489:
3488:
3457:
3454:
3452:
3449:
3448:
3447:
3421:
3418:
3417:
3416:
3397:
3394:
3393:
3392:
3344:
3341:
3339:
3336:
3335:
3334:
3322:
3319:
3318:
3317:
3293:
3290:
3289:
3288:
3265:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3209:
3206:
3205:
3204:
3182:
3179:
3178:
3177:
3104:
3101:
3099:
3096:
3095:
3094:
3057:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3010:
3007:
3006:
3005:
2987:
2986:Mass delinking
2984:
2983:
2982:
2941:
2938:
2937:
2936:
2922:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2907:
2906:
2892:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2868:and shortcuts
2806:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2783:
2780:
2778:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2754:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2730:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2694:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2674:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2658:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2642:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2614:
2611:
2610:
2609:
2587:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2567:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2552:
2549:
2548:
2547:
2529:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2505:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2485:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2450:
2447:
2446:
2445:
2434:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2418:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2374:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2358:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2343:
2340:
2338:
2335:
2324:
2323:Final decision
2321:
2320:
2319:
2308:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2286:
2268:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2203:
2195:
2194:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2145:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2116:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2061:
2060:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
1985:
1984:
1953:
1952:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1893:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1849:
1805:is a lot when
1794:
1791:
1789:
1786:
1784:
1770:
1769:
1745:
1739:
1604:
1598:
1581:
1580:
1561:
1560:
1472:
1466:
1443:
1442:
1421:User:JLaTondre
1417:User:Fritzpoll
1392:
1391:
1345:
1344:
1269:
1263:
1227:Featured lists
1209:
1203:
1185:
1184:
1181:The below post
1178:
1172:
1166:
1160:
1157:This statement
1072:2009 in sports
999:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
967:
956:
944:
933:
932:
925:
861:
855:
836:
835:
809:
808:
783:
782:
756:
755:
734:
733:
732:Motion request
703:
692:
686:
685:
684:
679:
674:
667:
664:
663:
662:
617:Colonies Chris
614:
560:
512:
464:
416:
368:
320:
272:
222:
219:
178:
177:
145:
144:
141:
140:
132:
127:
124:
122:
114:
113:
105:
104:
96:
95:
87:
86:
78:
77:
69:
68:
60:
59:
51:
50:
44:
43:
37:
36:
30:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
7081:
7070:
7067:
7066:
7064:
7055:
7053:
7048:
7047:
7046:
7039:
7035:
7033:
7028:
7027:
7023:
7022:
7018:
7014:
7013:
7012:
7006:
7000:
6998:
6993:
6992:
6991:
6989:
6984:
6983:
6980:
6978:
6974:
6969:
6968:
6966:
6965:
6963:
6962:
6955:
6951:
6949:
6944:
6943:
6941:
6939:
6936:
6933:
6929:
6925:
6923:
6916:
6914:
6913:
6904:
6900:
6898:
6893:
6892:
6890:
6888:
6884:
6881:
6878:
6874:
6870:
6867:
6864:
6860:
6854:
6852:
6851:
6842:
6838:
6836:
6831:
6830:
6829:
6827:
6823:
6819:
6812:
6807:
6804:
6799:
6796:
6791:
6788:
6783:
6780:
6777:
6774:
6769:
6764:
6760:
6756:
6749:
6745:
6743:
6738:
6737:
6736:
6733:
6730:
6727:
6721:
6716:
6712:
6709:
6706:
6702:
6699:
6696:
6692:
6689:
6687:
6682:
6680:
6672:
6668:
6664:
6661:
6658:
6654:
6651:
6649:
6646:
6642:
6638:
6635:
6632:
6628:
6625:
6623:
6620:
6616:
6612:
6609:
6606:
6602:
6599:
6595:
6592:
6590:
6583:
6582:
6577:
6573:
6572:
6571:
6568:
6563:
6561:
6558:
6551:
6547:
6543:
6539:
6536:
6533:
6529:
6526:
6524:
6521:
6520:
6518:Postlethwaite
6510:
6506:
6503:
6500:
6496:
6493:
6491:
6486:
6484:
6476:
6473:
6469:
6466:
6463:
6459:
6456:
6454:
6451:
6447:
6443:
6439:
6436:
6433:
6429:
6426:
6424:
6420:
6416:
6412:
6408:
6405:
6402:
6398:
6395:
6393:
6390:
6384:
6380:
6377:
6374:
6370:
6367:
6365:
6362:
6356:
6352:
6349:
6346:
6342:
6339:
6337:
6333:
6327:
6321:
6314:
6311:
6308:
6304:
6303:Date delinker
6301:
6299:
6296:
6290:
6286:
6283:
6280:
6276:
6273:
6272:
6271:
6265:
6261:
6258:
6257:
6256:
6249:
6245:
6243:
6238:
6237:
6227:
6223:
6217:
6216:
6210:
6207:
6204:
6203:
6202:
6201:
6197:
6196:
6195:
6193:
6189:
6185:
6181:
6175:
6172:
6171:
6170:
6164:
6163:
6158:wikimedia.org
6147:
6143:
6139:
6136:
6132:
6128:
6125:
6124:
6123:
6116:
6115:
6114:
6113:
6108:
6107:
6101:
6100:
6093:
6089:
6087:
6082:
6081:
6080:
6073:
6068:
6064:
6061:
6060:
6059:
6055:
6052:
6049:
6046:
6043:
6040:
6037:
6034:
6031:
6028:
6025:
6022:
6019:
6016:
6013:
6008:
6000:
5996:
5993:
5992:
5991:
5985:
5981:
5978:
5977:
5976:
5972:
5969:
5966:
5963:
5960:
5957:
5954:
5951:
5948:
5945:
5942:
5939:
5936:
5931:
5923:
5919:
5916:
5915:
5914:
5910:
5907:
5904:
5901:
5898:
5895:
5892:
5889:
5886:
5883:
5880:
5877:
5874:
5869:
5868:Tennis expert
5861:
5857:
5855:
5850:
5849:
5844:
5841:
5838:
5835:
5831:
5828:
5827:
5826:
5824:
5821:
5818:
5814:
5806:
5802:
5799:
5798:
5797:
5793:
5790:
5787:
5784:
5781:
5778:
5775:
5772:
5769:
5766:
5763:
5760:
5757:
5752:
5745:
5743:
5739:
5738:
5734:
5730:
5727:
5726:
5725:
5721:
5718:
5715:
5712:
5709:
5706:
5703:
5700:
5697:
5694:
5691:
5688:
5685:
5680:
5672:
5668:
5665:
5664:
5663:
5657:
5653:
5650:
5649:
5648:
5642:
5638:
5635:
5634:
5633:
5629:
5626:
5623:
5620:
5617:
5614:
5611:
5608:
5605:
5602:
5599:
5596:
5593:
5588:
5576:
5573:
5572:
5571:
5566:
5563:
5560:
5557:
5554:
5551:
5548:
5545:
5542:
5539:
5536:
5533:
5530:
5525:
5520:
5519:
5513:
5512:
5505:
5501:
5498:
5497:
5496:
5492:
5489:
5486:
5483:
5480:
5477:
5474:
5471:
5468:
5465:
5462:
5459:
5456:
5451:
5443:
5439:
5436:
5435:
5434:
5430:
5427:
5424:
5421:
5418:
5415:
5412:
5409:
5406:
5403:
5400:
5397:
5394:
5389:
5381:
5377:
5374:
5373:
5372:
5368:
5365:
5362:
5359:
5356:
5353:
5350:
5347:
5344:
5341:
5338:
5335:
5332:
5327:
5319:
5315:
5312:
5311:
5310:
5306:
5303:
5300:
5297:
5294:
5291:
5288:
5285:
5282:
5279:
5276:
5273:
5270:
5265:
5257:
5253:
5250:
5249:
5248:
5244:
5241:
5238:
5235:
5232:
5229:
5226:
5223:
5220:
5217:
5214:
5211:
5208:
5203:
5195:
5191:
5188:
5187:
5186:
5182:
5179:
5176:
5173:
5170:
5167:
5164:
5161:
5158:
5155:
5152:
5149:
5146:
5141:
5133:
5129:
5126:
5125:
5124:
5118:
5114:
5111:
5110:
5109:
5107:
5103:
5100:
5097:
5093:
5085:
5081:
5078:
5077:
5076:
5074:
5066:
5062:
5059:
5058:
5057:
5053:
5050:
5047:
5044:
5041:
5038:
5035:
5032:
5029:
5026:
5023:
5020:
5017:
5012:
5004:
4998:
4996:
4991:
4989:
4987:
4982:
4981:
4980:
4977:
4976:
4975:
4974:
4966:
4960:
4958:
4953:
4952:
4951:
4948:
4947:
4946:
4945:
4937:
4931:
4929:
4924:
4923:
4922:
4919:
4918:
4917:
4916:
4908:
4904:
4901:
4900:
4899:
4895:
4892:
4889:
4886:
4883:
4880:
4877:
4874:
4871:
4868:
4865:
4862:
4859:
4854:
4846:
4842:
4839:
4838:
4837:
4831:
4827:
4824:
4823:
4822:
4818:
4815:
4812:
4809:
4806:
4803:
4800:
4797:
4794:
4791:
4788:
4785:
4782:
4777:
4769:
4765:
4762:
4761:
4760:
4754:
4748:
4746:
4741:
4740:
4739:
4736:
4735:
4734:
4733:
4725:
4719:
4717:
4712:
4711:
4710:
4707:
4706:
4705:
4704:
4696:
4692:
4689:
4688:
4687:
4681:
4677:
4674:
4673:
4672:
4666:
4662:
4659:
4658:
4657:
4655:
4647:
4643:
4640:
4639:
4638:
4631:
4629:
4628:
4621:
4617:
4614:
4613:
4612:
4611:
4608:
4600:
4596:
4593:
4592:
4591:
4590:
4587:
4583:
4577:
4574:
4571:
4568:
4565:
4562:
4559:
4556:
4553:
4550:
4547:
4544:
4541:
4538:
4535:
4530:
4522:
4518:
4515:
4514:
4513:
4512:
4510:
4508:
4506:
4502:
4499:
4496:
4492:
4484:
4480:
4477:
4476:
4475:
4474:
4471:
4468:
4465:
4462:
4458:
4455:
4452:
4448:
4440:
4436:
4433:
4432:
4431:
4430:
4428:
4425:
4422:
4418:
4415:
4412:
4408:
4407:Tennis expert
4401:Tennis expert
4400:
4396:
4393:
4392:
4391:
4389:
4378:
4375:
4374:
4373:
4372:
4369:
4361:
4357:
4354:
4353:
4352:
4350:
4348:
4346:
4344:
4342:
4339:
4337:
4335:
4333:
4330:
4327:
4319:
4315:
4312:
4311:
4310:
4309:
4306:
4302:
4299:
4296:
4292:
4284:
4279:
4275:
4272:
4271:
4270:
4269:
4262:
4258:
4255:
4254:
4253:
4252:
4249:
4246:
4243:
4240:
4236:
4233:
4230:
4226:
4218:
4213:
4209:
4206:
4205:
4204:
4203:
4200:
4196:
4193:
4190:
4186:
4178:
4174:
4171:
4170:
4169:
4168:
4164:
4161:
4158:
4154:
4146:
4142:
4139:
4138:
4137:
4136:
4132:
4130:
4128:
4126:
4123:
4121:
4119:
4117:
4115:
4112:
4108:
4105:
4102:
4098:
4090:
4086:
4083:
4082:
4081:
4079:
4077:
4074:
4072:
4069:
4067:
4064:
4062:
4060:
4057:
4053:
4050:
4047:
4043:
4035:
4031:
4028:
4027:
4026:
4025:
4021:
4019:
4017:
4014:
4012:
4010:
4007:
4005:
4003:
4000:
3996:
3993:
3990:
3986:
3978:
3974:
3971:
3970:
3969:
3968:
3966:
3964:
3960:
3959:
3956:
3953:
3950:
3946:
3943:
3940:
3936:
3928:
3924:
3921:
3920:
3919:
3917:
3915:
3913:
3911:
3909:
3906:
3904:
3902:
3900:
3898:
3895:
3892:
3888:
3885:
3882:
3878:
3870:
3866:
3863:
3862:
3861:
3860:
3857:
3854:
3850:
3847:
3844:
3840:
3832:
3827:
3823:
3820:
3819:
3818:
3817:
3809:
3805:
3802:
3801:
3800:
3798:
3794:
3791:
3787:
3783:
3779:
3775:
3771:
3766:
3763:
3760:
3757:
3754:
3751:
3748:
3745:
3742:
3739:
3736:
3733:
3730:
3727:
3724:
3719:
3711:
3707:
3704:
3703:
3702:
3700:
3699:February 2009
3695:
3694:
3690:
3685:
3684:
3681:
3679:
3676:
3673:
3670:
3666:
3665:Date delinker
3658:
3654:
3651:
3650:
3649:
3648:
3645:
3641:
3640:
3638:
3635:
3631:
3630:
3627:
3624:
3621:
3617:
3616:Date delinker
3609:
3605:
3602:
3601:
3600:
3599:
3592:
3588:
3585:
3584:
3583:
3582:
3579:
3576:
3572:
3564:
3560:
3557:
3556:
3555:
3554:
3547:
3543:
3540:
3539:
3538:
3537:
3534:
3531:
3528:
3525:
3522:
3514:
3509:
3505:
3502:
3501:
3500:
3499:
3491:
3487:
3484:
3483:
3482:
3481:
3478:
3475:
3472:
3469:
3466:
3463:
3455:
3450:
3446:
3443:
3442:
3441:
3440:
3437:
3434:
3431:
3427:
3419:
3415:
3412:
3411:
3410:
3409:
3406:
3403:
3395:
3391:
3388:
3387:
3386:
3385:
3382:
3379:
3376:
3373:
3370:
3367:
3364:
3360:
3357:
3354:
3350:
3342:
3337:
3333:
3330:
3329:
3328:
3327:
3320:
3316:
3313:
3312:
3311:
3310:
3308:
3306:
3304:
3302:
3299:
3291:
3287:
3284:
3283:
3282:
3281:
3277:
3274:
3271:
3263:
3259:
3256:
3255:
3254:
3252:
3247:
3243:
3241:
3237:
3233:
3230:
3227:
3223:
3219:
3215:
3207:
3203:
3200:
3199:
3198:
3196:
3192:
3187:
3180:
3176:
3173:
3172:
3171:
3170:
3168:
3165:
3162:
3159:
3156:
3152:
3148:
3145:
3142:
3138:
3134:
3131:
3128:
3124:
3120:
3117:
3114:
3110:
3102:
3097:
3093:
3090:
3089:
3088:
3087:
3084:
3081:
3077:
3074:
3071:
3067:
3066:Tennis expert
3063:
3055:
3051:
3048:
3047:
3046:
3045:
3043:
3041:
3038:
3033:
3032:
3030:
3028:
3026:
3024:
3022:
3020:
3016:
3008:
3004:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2997:
2996:fait accompli
2993:
2985:
2981:
2978:
2977:
2976:
2974:
2971:
2967:
2963:
2959:
2953:
2951:
2947:
2939:
2935:
2932:
2931:
2930:
2928:
2920:
2916:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2905:
2902:
2901:
2900:
2898:
2890:
2886:
2883:
2882:
2881:
2879:
2875:
2871:
2867:
2863:
2859:
2855:
2853:
2850:
2848:
2845:
2841:
2837:
2832:
2831:
2828:
2824:
2820:
2816:
2812:
2804:
2800:
2797:
2796:
2795:
2793:
2789:
2781:
2776:
2772:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2765:
2759:
2752:
2748:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2741:
2736:
2728:
2724:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2717:
2713:
2709:
2701:
2692:
2688:
2685:
2684:
2683:
2680:
2672:
2668:
2665:
2664:
2663:
2656:
2652:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2641:Fait accompli
2640:
2636:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2629:
2624:
2620:
2612:
2608:
2605:
2604:
2603:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2585:
2581:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2573:
2565:
2561:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2550:
2546:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2539:
2535:
2527:
2523:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2516:
2512:
2503:
2499:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2492:
2483:
2479:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2448:
2444:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2432:
2428:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2416:
2412:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2405:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2372:
2368:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2356:
2352:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2341:
2336:
2334:
2333:
2331:
2322:
2318:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2290:
2287:
2285:
2282:
2280:
2279:
2272:
2269:
2267:
2263:
2260:
2257:
2253:
2249:
2246:
2245:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2231:Sam Blacketer
2228:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2212:Sam Blacketer
2209:
2208:fait accompli
2204:
2201:
2197:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2176:
2173:
2172:
2167:
2164:
2162:
2149:
2146:
2144:
2141:
2139:
2126:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2115:
2111:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2100:
2098:
2084:
2081:
2080:
2075:
2072:
2068:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2059:
2056:
2052:
2049:
2045:
2042:
2039:
2035:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2026:
2023:
2018:
2017:
2012:
2007:
2001:
2000:
1998:
1990:
1987:
1986:
1983:
1978:
1972:
1971:
1969:
1961:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1951:
1946:
1940:
1939:
1937:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1894:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1853:
1850:
1848:
1844:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1830:user:lightbot
1827:
1826:
1825:
1821:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1797:
1796:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1778:
1775:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1755:
1749:
1744:
1740:
1738:
1737:
1734:
1729:
1719:
1713:
1709:
1704:
1703:
1700:
1695:
1685:
1677:
1675:
1671:
1666:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1647:
1644:
1639:
1637:
1633:
1627:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1612:
1610:
1603:
1599:
1597:
1596:
1592:
1586:
1579:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1568:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1544:
1538:
1534:
1532:
1531:WordPress.com
1527:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1484:
1482:
1478:
1471:
1468:Statement by
1467:
1465:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1441:
1440:User:Kotniski
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1390:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1362:
1358:
1357:User:Kotniski
1354:
1350:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1324:
1322:
1317:
1312:
1307:
1303:
1298:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1279:
1275:
1268:
1264:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1248:third opinion
1245:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1208:
1205:Statement by
1204:
1202:
1201:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1182:
1179:
1177:
1173:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1150:
1148:
1143:
1139:
1138:“being bold”)
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1112:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1096:
1094:
1089:
1083:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1038:
1036:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1008:
998:
995:Statement by
994:
988:
985:
980:
978:
971:
968:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
936:
935:
934:
930:
926:
923:
919:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
906:
905:
902:
897:
895:
888:
883:
880:
877:
874:
869:
865:
860:
857:Statement by
856:
854:
853:
850:
846:
842:
833:
832:
831:
830:
827:
823:
819:
814:
813:fait accompli
806:
805:
804:
803:
800:
796:
792:
788:
780:
779:
778:
777:
774:
770:
766:
762:
761:Fait accompli
753:
752:
751:
750:
747:
743:
739:
731:
730:
729:
728:
725:
721:
717:
708:
702:
697:
691:
688:Statement by
687:
683:
680:
678:
675:
673:
670:
669:
665:
659:
656:
653:
650:
647:
644:
641:
638:
635:
632:
629:
626:
623:
618:
615:
611:
608:
605:
602:
599:
596:
593:
590:
587:
584:
581:
578:
575:
572:
569:
564:
561:
557:
554:
551:
548:
545:
542:
539:
536:
533:
530:
527:
524:
521:
516:
513:
509:
506:
503:
500:
497:
494:
491:
488:
485:
482:
479:
476:
473:
468:
465:
461:
458:
455:
452:
449:
446:
443:
440:
437:
434:
431:
428:
425:
420:
417:
413:
410:
407:
404:
401:
398:
395:
392:
389:
386:
383:
380:
377:
372:
369:
365:
362:
359:
356:
353:
350:
347:
344:
341:
338:
335:
332:
329:
324:
321:
317:
314:
311:
308:
305:
302:
299:
296:
293:
290:
287:
284:
281:
276:
273:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
245:
242:
239:
236:
233:
228:
225:
224:
220:
218:
216:
212:
208:
203:
201:
197:
192:
190:
186:
172:
171:
166:
165:
160:
159:
154:
153:
138:
134:
133:
130:
125:
123:
119:
118:
110:
109:
101:
100:
92:
91:
83:
82:
74:
73:
65:
64:
56:
55:
47:
40:
33:
27:
19:
7049:
7043:
7029:
7010:
6994:
6985:
6970:
6967:
6964:
6960:
6959:
6945:
6934:
6921:
6920:
6918:
6911:
6910:
6908:
6894:
6879:
6865:
6856:
6849:
6848:
6846:
6832:
6805:
6797:
6789:
6781:
6775:
6753:
6739:
6734:
6731:
6728:
6725:
6705:WP:AE report
6697:
6678:
6659:
6633:
6607:
6584:
6580:
6556:
6545:
6534:
6512:
6501:
6482:
6464:
6434:
6403:
6375:
6347:
6309:
6281:
6269:
6259:
6253:
6239:
6191:
6190:
6186:
6182:
6179:
6168:
6120:
6110:
6109:
6083:
6077:
6062:
6050:
6044:
6038:
6032:
6026:
6020:
6014:
6007:Arthur Rubin
6004:
5994:
5989:
5979:
5967:
5961:
5955:
5949:
5943:
5937:
5927:
5917:
5905:
5899:
5893:
5887:
5881:
5875:
5865:
5851:
5819:
5810:
5800:
5788:
5782:
5776:
5770:
5764:
5758:
5748:
5741:
5740:
5728:
5716:
5710:
5704:
5698:
5692:
5686:
5676:
5666:
5661:
5651:
5646:
5636:
5624:
5618:
5612:
5606:
5600:
5594:
5584:
5574:
5561:
5555:
5549:
5543:
5537:
5531:
5521:
5499:
5487:
5481:
5475:
5469:
5463:
5457:
5447:
5437:
5425:
5419:
5413:
5407:
5401:
5395:
5385:
5375:
5363:
5357:
5351:
5345:
5339:
5333:
5323:
5313:
5301:
5295:
5289:
5283:
5277:
5271:
5261:
5251:
5239:
5233:
5227:
5221:
5215:
5209:
5202:2008Olympian
5199:
5189:
5177:
5171:
5165:
5159:
5153:
5147:
5137:
5127:
5122:
5112:
5098:
5089:
5079:
5070:
5060:
5048:
5042:
5036:
5030:
5024:
5018:
5008:
4992:
4983:
4978:
4972:
4970:
4954:
4949:
4943:
4941:
4925:
4920:
4914:
4912:
4902:
4890:
4884:
4878:
4872:
4866:
4860:
4850:
4840:
4835:
4825:
4813:
4807:
4801:
4795:
4789:
4783:
4773:
4763:
4758:
4742:
4737:
4731:
4729:
4713:
4708:
4702:
4700:
4690:
4685:
4675:
4670:
4660:
4651:
4641:
4635:
4626:
4625:
4615:
4604:
4594:
4572:
4566:
4560:
4554:
4548:
4542:
4536:
4529:Arthur Rubin
4526:
4523:Arthur Rubin
4516:
4497:
4488:
4478:
4453:
4444:
4434:
4413:
4404:
4394:
4386:
4376:
4365:
4355:
4323:
4313:
4297:
4288:
4273:
4266:
4256:
4231:
4222:
4207:
4191:
4182:
4172:
4159:
4150:
4140:
4103:
4094:
4084:
4048:
4039:
4029:
3991:
3982:
3972:
3961:
3941:
3935:2008Olympian
3932:
3929:2008Olympian
3922:
3883:
3874:
3864:
3845:
3836:
3821:
3813:
3803:
3761:
3755:
3749:
3743:
3737:
3731:
3725:
3715:
3705:
3696:
3686:
3671:
3662:
3652:
3642:
3632:
3622:
3613:
3603:
3596:
3586:
3570:
3568:
3558:
3551:
3541:
3518:
3503:
3495:
3485:
3459:
3444:
3425:
3423:
3413:
3399:
3389:
3355:
3346:
3331:
3324:
3314:
3300:date links.
3297:
3295:
3285:
3267:
3257:
3248:
3244:
3228:
3211:
3201:
3191:BRFA archive
3184:
3174:
3157:
3143:
3129:
3115:
3106:
3091:
3072:
3059:
3049:
3034:
3012:
3002:
2995:
2989:
2979:
2954:
2943:
2933:
2924:
2914:
2908:
2903:
2894:
2884:
2833:
2808:
2798:
2785:
2770:
2760:
2756:
2746:
2732:
2722:
2712:foundation-l
2696:
2686:
2676:
2666:
2660:
2650:
2644:
2634:
2616:
2606:
2589:
2579:
2569:
2559:
2554:
2544:
2538:common sense
2531:
2521:
2513:rather than
2507:
2497:
2493:mechanisms.
2487:
2477:
2452:
2442:
2436:
2426:
2420:
2417:User conduct
2410:
2376:
2366:
2360:
2350:
2345:
2327:
2326:
2316:
2310:
2288:
2277:
2276:
2270:
2258:
2247:
2226:
2207:
2199:
2174:
2153:
2147:
2130:
2124:
2089:
2082:
2066:
2050:
2033:
1996:
1995:
1988:
1967:
1966:
1935:
1934:
1914:
1895:
1851:
1783:
1779:
1773:
1771:
1762:
1758:
1750:
1747:
1725:
1711:
1705:
1691:
1678:
1667:
1662:
1648:
1640:
1635:
1631:
1628:
1616:a discussion
1613:
1606:
1584:
1582:
1562:
1554:Arthur Rubin
1528:
1519:
1515:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1485:
1480:
1476:
1474:
1451:a bureacracy
1444:
1395:
1393:
1361:pointy edits
1346:
1325:
1299:
1271:
1238:
1214:
1211:
1188:
1186:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1116:
1115:
1113:
1100:
1097:
1092:
1087:
1084:
1064:Arthur Rubin
1061:
1057:
1045:
1041:
1039:
1029:
1025:
1020:
1006:
1001:
976:
969:
964:a recent RfC
959:
951:
947:
939:
928:
917:
909:
908:
907:
893:
884:
881:
878:
875:
871:
867:
863:
837:
810:
786:
784:
757:
735:
712:
699:
694:
654:
648:
642:
636:
630:
624:
606:
600:
594:
588:
582:
576:
570:
552:
546:
540:
534:
528:
522:
504:
498:
492:
486:
480:
474:
456:
450:
444:
438:
432:
426:
408:
402:
396:
390:
384:
378:
360:
354:
348:
342:
336:
330:
312:
306:
300:
294:
288:
282:
264:
258:
252:
246:
240:
234:
204:
193:
181:
169:
163:
157:
151:
117:Case Amended
115:
108:Case Amended
106:
99:Case Amended
97:
90:Case Amended
88:
81:Case Amended
79:
72:Case Amended
70:
63:Case Amended
61:
54:Case Amended
52:
46:Case Amended
45:
38:
31:
29:
6973:Ohconfucius
6928:Ohconfucius
6810:user rights
6786:actions log
6474:request at
6397:Ohconfucius
6341:Ohconfucius
6275:Ohconfucius
6137:("AN"); and
6069:Enforcement
6030:protections
5450:Dudesleeper
5011:Ohconfucius
4955:Revoked by
4552:protections
4153:Dudesleeper
4147:Dudesleeper
3741:protections
3510:Ohconfucius
2958:user:Werdna
2950:overlinking
2927:date debate
2897:overlinking
2834:A merge of
2819:August 2008
2729:Open source
1881:Thank you.
1815:ANI of Dec.
1655:Ohconfucius
1512:WP:NOTPAPER
1492:robotically
1455:Ohconfucius
1425:Ohconfucius
1374:Ohconfucius
1329:Ohconfucius
1321:17 November
1174:Kotniski’s
1101:respondents
997:User:Greg L
586:protections
467:Ohconfucius
137:WP:RFAR/DDL
39:Case Closed
32:Case Opened
6859:Lightmouse
6691:Pmanderson
6679:Sandstein
6643:" remedy.
6627:Lightmouse
6617:" remedy.
6601:Locke Cole
6483:Sandstein
6112:Committee.
6042:page moves
5965:block user
5959:filter log
5903:block user
5897:filter log
5813:Locke Cole
5786:block user
5780:filter log
5751:Locke Cole
5714:block user
5708:filter log
5679:Locke Cole
5622:block user
5616:filter log
5559:block user
5553:filter log
5485:block user
5479:filter log
5423:block user
5417:filter log
5361:block user
5355:filter log
5299:block user
5293:filter log
5237:block user
5231:filter log
5175:block user
5169:filter log
5046:block user
5040:filter log
4888:block user
4882:filter log
4811:block user
4805:filter log
4564:page moves
4291:Locke Cole
4280:Locke Cole
4225:Pmanderson
4214:Pmanderson
3774:retirement
3753:page moves
3137:Lightmouse
3098:Lightmouse
2870:WP:CONTEXT
2823:deprecated
2708:wikitech-l
2570:11.4) The
2471:exceptions
2396:harassment
2384:incivility
2337:Principles
2293:Carcharoth
2183:Lightmouse
2110:Guy Peters
1774:ad nauseum
1674:an opinion
1591:Guy Peters
1567:Guy Peters
1543:Guy Peters
1470:Guy Peters
1370:good faith
1316:disruptive
1239:both sides
1235:User:Tony1
940:incivility
887:Proposal 3
841:Locke Cole
818:Locke Cole
791:Locke Cole
765:Locke Cole
738:Locke Cole
716:Locke Cole
690:Locke Cole
652:block user
646:filter log
598:page moves
550:block user
544:filter log
515:Guy Peters
502:block user
496:filter log
454:block user
448:filter log
406:block user
400:filter log
371:Lightmouse
358:block user
352:filter log
310:block user
304:filter log
262:block user
256:filter log
227:Locke Cole
7052:by motion
7032:by motion
6988:by motion
6948:by motion
6897:by motion
6835:by motion
6794:block log
6742:by motion
6671:AE report
6450:Jehochman
6150:arbcom-en
6036:deletions
5971:block log
5909:block log
5854:by motion
5792:block log
5720:block log
5628:block log
5565:block log
5491:block log
5429:block log
5367:block log
5326:SkyWalker
5305:block log
5243:block log
5181:block log
5108:methods.
5075:methods.
5052:block log
4894:block log
4817:block log
4558:deletions
4491:Kendrick7
4042:SkyWalker
4036:SkyWalker
3747:deletions
3123:Editore99
3109:Bobblewik
3037:WT:MOSNUM
3015:edit wars
2962:bug 17785
2815:WT:MOSNUM
2467:reversion
2455:consensus
2278:Wizardman
1927:WP:MOSNUM
1670:ownership
1651:WT:MOSNUM
1506:would be
1447:consensus
1306:WP:MOSNUM
1295:stay calm
1283:ownership
1244:mediation
1142:precisely
1126:block log
1122:block log
1070:today to
1068:this edit
960:bot usage
948:consensus
658:block log
592:deletions
556:block log
508:block log
460:block log
412:block log
364:block log
316:block log
268:block log
196:/Workshop
191:subpage.
189:/Evidence
7063:Category
6938:contribs
6883:contribs
6873:Lightbot
6869:contribs
6802:flag log
6779:contribs
6701:contribs
6667:Kilogram
6663:contribs
6637:contribs
6611:contribs
6538:contribs
6505:contribs
6468:contribs
6438:contribs
6428:Dabomb87
6407:contribs
6388:Tiptoety
6379:contribs
6360:Tiptoety
6351:contribs
6331:contribs
6313:contribs
6294:Tiptoety
6285:contribs
6018:contribs
5941:contribs
5879:contribs
5852:Passed,
5846:fashion.
5823:contribs
5762:contribs
5690:contribs
5598:contribs
5535:contribs
5461:contribs
5399:contribs
5337:contribs
5275:contribs
5213:contribs
5151:contribs
5140:Dabomb87
5102:contribs
5092:Kotniski
5022:contribs
4864:contribs
4787:contribs
4622:Remedies
4584:editor.
4582:involved
4540:contribs
4501:contribs
4457:contribs
4417:contribs
4301:contribs
4235:contribs
4195:contribs
4163:contribs
4107:contribs
4052:contribs
3995:contribs
3945:contribs
3887:contribs
3877:Dabomb87
3871:Dabomb87
3849:contribs
3839:Kotniski
3828:Kotniski
3797:see also
3729:contribs
3675:contribs
3626:contribs
3384:and more
3359:contribs
3232:contribs
3222:CleanBot
3189:bots at
3161:contribs
3151:Lightbot
3147:contribs
3133:contribs
3119:contribs
3076:contribs
2946:bug 4582
2940:Bug 4582
2878:WP:BUILD
2700:Bugzilla
2463:edit war
2392:trolling
2262:contribs
2252:Casliber
2189:and the
2083:Question
2038:FloNight
2022:FloNight
1900:Vassyana
1883:Vassyana
1869:Vassyana
1708:this one
1643:Dabomb87
1620:Lightbot
1558:Franamax
1508:orphaned
1477:how many
1343:Addendum
1252:Dabomb87
1207:Dabomb87
1114:What is
1093:See also
1050:Dabomb87
1026:Kilogram
1021:See also
1007:Kilogram
1005:here in
952:official
910:Addendum
628:contribs
574:contribs
526:contribs
478:contribs
430:contribs
419:Dabomb87
382:contribs
334:contribs
286:contribs
238:contribs
129:Shortcut
7050:Passed
7030:Passed
6986:Passed
6946:Passed
6895:Passed
6833:Passed
6740:Passed
6576:UC Bill
6559:delanoy
6509:blocked
6442:blocked
6411:blocked
6383:blocked
6355:blocked
6289:blocked
5388:HJensen
4097:HJensen
4091:HJensen
3689:reverts
2970:example
2623:Scripts
2373:Decorum
2200:writing
2175:Comment
2125:Comment
2051:Comment
1915:Comment
1712:totally
1585:are not
1494:remove
1488:against
1408:Firefox
1130:(here),
6997:motion
6761:, and
6669:, see
6653:Greg L
6415:Daniel
6319:seicer
6142:"ARCA"
6048:rights
6024:blocks
6005:38.1)
5928:36.1)
5866:35.2)
5749:33.6)
5448:29.1)
5386:28.1)
4995:motion
4986:motion
4957:motion
4928:motion
4853:Greg L
4745:motion
4716:motion
4570:rights
4546:blocks
3786:return
3759:rights
3735:blocks
3451:Greg L
3121:) and
3062:battle
2874:WP:BTW
2864:, and
2710:, and
2706:, and
2511:colour
2402:, and
2289:Recuse
2271:Accept
2248:Recuse
2227:accept
2191:MOSNUM
2148:Accept
2067:Accept
2034:Accept
1989:Accept
1923:WP:BAG
1896:Accept
1852:Accept
1754:WP:ANI
1659:Greg L
1636:either
1583:Years
1556:&
1524:WP:AfD
1516:499 BC
1500:499 BC
1190:Greg L
1088:should
983:(talk)
900:(talk)
604:rights
580:blocks
323:Greg L
6824:" in
6708:Shell
6546:twice
6472:WP:AE
6458:Ksnow
5930:G-Man
5742:Note:
4776:Tony1
4701:7.1)
4447:G-Man
4441:G-Man
3349:Tony1
3338:Tony1
3195:RFC/U
3060:9) A
2842:into
2532:9.1)
2515:color
2160:AVIES
2137:AVIES
2096:AVIES
2071:Coren
2055:Coren
1999:levse
1970:levse
1938:levse
1930:them.
1811:these
1578:Tony1
1351:into
1274:civil
1046:facts
859:Tony1
275:Tony1
16:<
6971:18)
6932:talk
6924:case
6909:The
6877:talk
6863:talk
6847:The
6773:BRFA
6695:talk
6657:talk
6631:talk
6605:talk
6588:Talk
6566:adds
6532:talk
6515:Ryan
6499:talk
6462:talk
6432:talk
6419:talk
6401:talk
6373:talk
6345:talk
6325:talk
6307:talk
6279:talk
6012:talk
5953:logs
5935:talk
5891:logs
5873:talk
5817:talk
5774:logs
5756:talk
5702:logs
5684:talk
5677:33)
5610:logs
5592:talk
5587:John
5585:30)
5547:logs
5529:talk
5524:John
5522:30)
5473:logs
5455:talk
5411:logs
5393:talk
5349:logs
5331:talk
5324:27)
5287:logs
5269:talk
5262:26)
5225:logs
5207:talk
5200:25)
5163:logs
5145:talk
5138:24)
5096:talk
5090:22)
5034:logs
5016:talk
5009:19)
4971:18)
4942:17)
4913:16)
4876:logs
4858:talk
4851:15)
4799:logs
4781:talk
4774:10)
4534:talk
4527:51)
4495:talk
4489:50)
4451:talk
4445:49)
4411:talk
4405:48)
4390:).
4295:talk
4289:45)
4229:talk
4223:43)
4189:talk
4185:John
4183:42)
4179:John
4157:talk
4151:41)
4101:talk
4095:40)
4046:talk
4040:39)
3989:talk
3983:38)
3939:talk
3933:37)
3881:talk
3875:35)
3843:talk
3837:33)
3723:talk
3669:talk
3620:talk
3381:more
3378:more
3353:talk
3347:18)
3251:link
3226:talk
3155:talk
3141:talk
3127:talk
3113:talk
3107:10)
3070:talk
2876:and
2838:and
2619:Bots
2617:14)
2297:talk
2256:talk
2235:talk
2216:talk
2156:OGER
2133:OGER
2092:OGER
2032:Now
2005:Talk
1976:Talk
1958:See
1944:Talk
1904:talk
1887:talk
1873:talk
1799:8660
1710:are
1632:more
1622:. I
1537:2003
1520:2059
1504:2059
1481:some
1459:talk
1429:talk
1419:and
1378:talk
1333:talk
1311:this
1256:talk
1246:and
1225:and
1219:here
1195:talk
1109:here
1107:and
1105:here
1030:many
1014:and
977:Tony
927:(b)
916:(a)
894:Tony
640:logs
622:talk
568:talk
538:logs
520:talk
490:logs
472:talk
442:logs
424:talk
394:logs
376:talk
346:logs
328:talk
298:logs
280:talk
250:logs
232:talk
6645:AGK
6619:AGK
6548:by
6054:RfA
4730:8)
4576:RfA
4111:TE1
3795:) (
3765:RfA
3571:all
3436:TE2
3433:TE1
3426:all
3405:MB2
3298:all
3280:3-2
3276:3-1
3253:).
3197:.
3163:).
3083:Ohc
2992:AWB
2944:6)
2880:.
2827:MfD
2817:in
2809:2)
2714:or
2181:to
2041:♥♥♥
2025:♥♥♥
1717:Hex
1683:Hex
1663:you
1602:Hex
1518:to
1502:to
1496:all
1355:by
1117:not
610:RfA
563:Hex
7065::
6757:,
6673:.
6581:NW
6578:.
6540:)
6507:)
6477:.
6448:.
6440:)
6421:)
6409:)
6381:)
6353:)
6328:|
6322:|
6287:)
6194::
6160:).
4656:.
4607:MB
4586:MB
4371:JV
4368:Oh
4351:)
4340:)(
4329:FG
4326:MB
4308:T1
4305:Oh
4251:T1
4135:JV
4133:)
4124:)(
4080:)
4075:)(
4070:)(
4065:)(
4056:TE
4024:JV
4022:)
4015:)(
4008:)(
3999:TE
3958:TE
3918:)
3907:)(
3894:TE
3891:LC
3856:FG
3853:MB
3816:JV
3799:)
3788:,
3784:,
3780:,
3776:,
3772:,
3701:.
3693:AE
3581:TE
3575:JV
3439:JV
3430:LC
3408:LC
3402:MB
3242:.
3166:,
3086:TE
3080:JV
3019:JV
2975:.
2872:,
2860:,
2702:,
2398:,
2394:,
2390:,
2386:,
2382:,
2299:)
2264:)
2237:)
2218:)
2086:--
2008:•
2002:•
1993:—
1979:•
1973:•
1964:—
1947:•
1941:•
1932:—
1906:)
1889:)
1875:)
1840:.
1731:❞)
1727:?!
1723:(❝
1697:❞)
1693:?!
1689:(❝
1539:.
1526:.
1461:)
1431:)
1423:.
1415:,
1380:)
1335:)
1323:.
1258:)
1215:is
1042:do
1040:I
847:•
843:•
824:•
820:•
797:•
793:•
771:•
767:•
744:•
740:•
722:•
718:•
704:—
217:.
202:.
167:,
161:,
155:,
7019:.
6979:.
6935:·
6930:(
6880:·
6875:(
6866:·
6861:(
6813:)
6806:·
6798:·
6790:·
6782:·
6776:·
6771:(
6698:·
6693:(
6660:·
6655:(
6634:·
6629:(
6608:·
6603:(
6591:)
6585:(
6557:.
6555:J
6535:·
6530:(
6502:·
6497:(
6465:·
6460:(
6435:·
6430:(
6417:(
6404:·
6399:(
6376:·
6371:(
6348:·
6343:(
6310:·
6305:(
6282:·
6277:(
6056:)
6051:·
6045:·
6039:·
6033:·
6027:·
6021:·
6015:·
6010:(
5973:)
5968:·
5962:·
5956:·
5950:·
5944:·
5938:·
5933:(
5911:)
5906:·
5900:·
5894:·
5888:·
5882:·
5876:·
5871:(
5820:·
5815:(
5794:)
5789:·
5783:·
5777:·
5771:·
5765:·
5759:·
5754:(
5722:)
5717:·
5711:·
5705:·
5699:·
5693:·
5687:·
5682:(
5630:)
5625:·
5619:·
5613:·
5607:·
5601:·
5595:·
5590:(
5567:)
5562:·
5556:·
5550:·
5544:·
5538:·
5532:·
5527:(
5493:)
5488:·
5482:·
5476:·
5470:·
5464:·
5458:·
5453:(
5431:)
5426:·
5420:·
5414:·
5408:·
5402:·
5396:·
5391:(
5369:)
5364:·
5358:·
5352:·
5346:·
5340:·
5334:·
5329:(
5307:)
5302:·
5296:·
5290:·
5284:·
5278:·
5272:·
5267:(
5245:)
5240:·
5234:·
5228:·
5222:·
5216:·
5210:·
5205:(
5183:)
5178:·
5172:·
5166:·
5160:·
5154:·
5148:·
5143:(
5099:·
5094:(
5054:)
5049:·
5043:·
5037:·
5031:·
5025:·
5019:·
5014:(
4896:)
4891:·
4885:·
4879:·
4873:·
4867:·
4861:·
4856:(
4819:)
4814:·
4808:·
4802:·
4796:·
4790:·
4784:·
4779:(
4610:V
4589:V
4578:)
4573:·
4567:·
4561:·
4555:·
4549:·
4543:·
4537:·
4532:(
4505:V
4498:·
4493:(
4473:5
4470:4
4467:3
4464:2
4461:1
4454:·
4449:(
4427:3
4424:2
4421:1
4414:·
4409:(
4331:(
4298:·
4293:(
4248:4
4245:3
4242:2
4239:1
4232:·
4227:(
4202:2
4199:1
4192:·
4187:(
4167:V
4160:·
4155:(
4113:(
4104:·
4099:(
4058:(
4049:·
4044:(
4001:(
3992:·
3987:(
3942:·
3937:(
3896:(
3884:·
3879:(
3859:V
3846:·
3841:(
3782:2
3778:1
3767:)
3762:·
3756:·
3750:·
3744:·
3738:·
3732:·
3726:·
3721:(
3691:/
3672:·
3667:(
3623:·
3618:(
3578:V
3536:6
3533:5
3530:4
3527:3
3524:2
3521:1
3498:V
3480:7
3477:6
3474:5
3471:4
3468:3
3465:2
3462:1
3375:5
3372:4
3369:3
3366:2
3363:1
3356:·
3351:(
3278:/
3273:2
3270:1
3229:·
3224:(
3158:·
3153:(
3144:·
3139:(
3130:·
3125:(
3116:·
3111:(
3073:·
3068:(
2295:(
2259:·
2254:(
2233:(
2214:(
2206:"
2158:D
2154:R
2135:D
2131:R
2108:—
2094:D
2090:R
1997:R
1968:R
1936:R
1902:(
1885:(
1871:(
1589:—
1565:—
1541:—
1457:(
1427:(
1376:(
1331:(
1254:(
1197:)
1193:(
924:.
849:c
845:t
826:c
822:t
799:c
795:t
773:c
769:t
746:c
742:t
724:c
720:t
660:)
655:·
649:·
643:·
637:·
631:·
625:·
620:(
612:)
607:·
601:·
595:·
589:·
583:·
577:·
571:·
566:(
558:)
553:·
547:·
541:·
535:·
529:·
523:·
518:(
510:)
505:·
499:·
493:·
487:·
481:·
475:·
470:(
462:)
457:·
451:·
445:·
439:·
433:·
427:·
422:(
414:)
409:·
403:·
397:·
391:·
385:·
379:·
374:(
366:)
361:·
355:·
349:·
343:·
337:·
331:·
326:(
318:)
313:·
307:·
301:·
295:·
289:·
283:·
278:(
270:)
265:·
259:·
253:·
247:·
241:·
235:·
230:(
170:4
164:3
158:2
152:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.