Knowledge (XXG)

:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba 2/Evidence - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

1464:, which he calls the "Official home page for M. Alan Kazlev". SS108 now says here and on his blog that he "didn't start this fight", even though his original page was antagonistic to me whereas mine wasn't to him. His recent blog about me, which seems to be solely a response to my defense of Priddy, is full of attempts at childish ridicule. For the rest, see the pages documented on my website, to which SS108 has very graciously provided the links. 358:. Unlike Ekantik, I have not waged extra-Knowledge (XXG) attacks against him about his presence and edits on Knowledge (XXG). This issue is about his attempt to pass himself off a neutral editor who was not involved in the Sai Controversy (when he is), that he does not have a POV regarding SSB (when he does), attempting to pass himself off as two separate editors (he even greeted his sockpuppet with his Ekantik account 1771:) removes request for citation from the first sentence. Please note that until Kkrystian edited the first sentence every word and number of the first sentences was sourced to a reputable source. (The article as a whole may be poorly sourced, but the first sentence is not.) I never had big problems with Krystian, but some of his edits, like this one, make me very tired. 1456:
Researcher) indicates my initial support of the devotees. I wrote this page because I wanted to document my journey, and because it may be of interest to others investigating this subject, and continually added to and revised it. However, because in one revision I for the first time mentioned SS108 in addition to ex-devotees, and all in a
267: 879: 152: 173: 154: 148: 146: 1094: 150: 2024:
This incident and SSS108's general behaviour, in my view, shows a significant conflict of interest whereby SSS108 is acting off and on-Knowledge (XXG) as an unofficial spokesperson for the SSB Organisation (as he hs never been openly acknowledged by them) and that this behaviour presents a difficulty
1416:
Andries and Priddy's Anti-Sai Sites now contain a disclaimer that states that the information on their Anti-Sai websites may not necessarily be true or valid. I can also put ArbCom in contact with another person who has filed complaints of defamation against Priddy. Priddy deleted the pages regarding
1098: 2020:
As the SSB magazine states that they received the statement/case information from the (devotee) lawyer who represented the SSB Org. in the case, this can only mean that SSS108 received the same information from the same lawyer two months beforehand. And before anybody else to boot, which shows that
1100: 1096: 1086: 1999:
He has also stated many times that he is not currently a devotee of SSB although he has been a devotee in the past. In May 2006 he posted material on his website regarding a self-dismissed court case against the SSB Organisation by Alaya Rahm, who claims to have been serially molested and sexually
54:
Please make a section for your evidence and add evidence only in your own section. Please limit your evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs, a much shorter, concise presentation is more likely to be effective. Please focus on the issues raised in the complaint and answer and on diffs which
1667:
It is my hope that a skilled writer who has the trust of the opposing factions is willing to make corrections. As a reward to the skilled writer for offering his or her valuable time, I am willing to do Knowledge (XXG) chores, like vandalism fighting, or spelling corrections. I hope other regular
1455:
Originally I was much more positive to SS108, and regarded both him and ex-devotees in an equally positive light. Only gradually did my opinions change. See the "anti Sai Baba Deceptions" page for the full story. Even the name of that web page (suggested by the subject of an email by Freelance
40:
As such, it is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff; links to the page itself are not sufficient. For example, to cite the edit by Mennonot to the article Anomalous phenomenon adding a link to Hundredth Monkey use
2011:
This particular incident (and several others) show at the very least that he is in contact with one or more prominent SSB leaders/representatives and for which he is acting as an unnofficial mouthpiece. I can provide the evidence for this and I have made relevant screen-captures of the concerned
1084: 65:
Be aware that the Arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent. If you are a participant in the case or a third party, please don't try to refactor the page, let the Arbitrators do it. If you object to evidence which is inserted by other participants or third parties
1104: 1102: 1090: 1088: 884:
Although Reinier van der Sandt claimed that he has never seen or followed Sathya Sai Baba, he has waged a very public smear campaign against him on the internet and has created the following websites that contain Anti-Sai material on them (as of today, all of these sites work and are active):
1092: 2004:
anybody else, even SSB-critics, and posted the information with supporting scans of legal documents on his website. This material was replicated on devotional SSB-websites with a link provided back to SSS108's site as the source. The subject of the case was also discussed at length by a
307:
and engaged me in debate incognito before I discovered his sockpuppet. His presence on the article and his pugnacity toward me are now fully understood in light of his true identity. He also felt the critics section needed to be expanded to reflect at least half of the entire article
2663:
Place argument and diffs which support your assertion; for example, your first assertion might be "So-and-so engages in edit warring", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show So-and-so engaging in edit warring.
2604:.If it were an archive why is that there are also comments by other editors related to the discussion on January 15th? When I edited it was not an archive, it was an ongoing discussion. It was archived much later.Ekantik's evidence that I modified the above archives is a lie. 2572:.These two were part of a general discussion from Sathya sai talk page. There is not single line in my statement to prove that these were signs of aggressive behaviour. The last link was my response after he threatened to block me in my userpage for differing from his edits 1990:
In regards to Conflict of Interest, I submit that SSS108 is acting as an unofficial representative (at best) of the SSB Organisation. SSS108 disclaims any association with the SSB Organisation or his affiliation with any particular branch, and that his website was created
1537:
I have followed M. Alan Kazlev's journey to a great extent and what he writes here about his journey corresponds with my observations about his journey, however I hardly see the relevance of M. Alan Kazlev's journey for the set of Knowledge (XXG) articles regarding
858:. One will notice that these caches do not show anything because Google can only cache what is on the site, and not the framed page from another domain. The text that shows is meant for non-frames browers. If you view the source code for the current version of the 2291:
and was agreed by all editors not to be included, inappropriate because it contains defamatory accounts and original research that is partisan to the controversy. Incidentally the defamatory website Kkrystian wants to repeatedly include is owned and maintained by
1931:
For every editor (including Knowledge (XXG) Administrators) who disagree with SSS108's rationale for his edits/behaviour, SSS108 promptly accuses them of "pushing an agenda" or otherwise insinuate that hey are against SSB, part of a cabal and conspiracy theory:
2672:
Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion; for example, your second assertion might be "So-and-so makes personal attacks", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits where So-and-so made personal attacks.
1825:
Although I understand that off-Wiki activites are little relevant to on-Wiki proceedings, I will give a brief description of SSS108'S off-Wiki activities (as SSS108's problem is with off-Wiki activites of other editors) that highlight a bias and agenda to
2544:) is ridiculous. The first was a discussion on talk page about the political news related to Baba taken from newspapers that I have quoted as reference and my strong support for a NPOV subcategory title does not make me an ardent follower of Sai Baba. 584:. Once again, this suggests that Andries is unwilling to accept the ArbCom ruling and the warnings of two Admin and will push forward with his Anti-Sai agenda at any cost. Needless to say, Andries still believes he is right and ArbCom and Admin are wrong 66:
please cite the evidence and voice your objections within your own section of the page. It is especially important to not remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move.
2634:
Ekantik misused wikipedia policies for POV pushing and threatened to block me for differing from his edits. He added warnings to my talk page for disagreeing to his wrong WP:MOS and edits.He added the second warning to my userpage
2638:.Then after suggestion from another editor I renamed the Section "Criticism" to "Criticism and replies" he added the second warning in my talk page saying I disrupted the article and threatened to block me giving third warning 2384:). After I have patiently and civilly explained to him where he is going wrong and how to edit better, he has become notably hostile towards me and accuses me of making personal attacks and acting incivilly without explanation. 1068:. Reinier spammed me with hate-mail using various proxy IPs. I was able to identify him because he used an unusual term in his attack pages against me that was used (in the exact same manner) in 4 of 25 hate-mails sent to me 74: 2355:
as the most outstanding. Despite the efforts of several editors (especially myself) to patiently coach and explain to him the hows and whys of editing Knowledge (XXG), Wikisunn has continued to engage in disruptive editing
1395:
critical of Robert Priddy. This is allowed all throughout Knowledge (XXG) on pages not bound by an ArbCom ruling. I do not see any reason why I can't have my webpage listed as an external link (providing I don't include it
1500:
I can hardly give new evidence because little has changed and happened since the last arbitration. I will not digress on issues that have been treated in the previous arbitration case unless requested so by abritrators.
553:
and refuses to agree to the same proposition all the other editors agreed to. This suggests that Andries is unwilling to cooperate with other editors and is adamant that the article should be shaped according to his
48: 464:
Kazlev created the following pages against me, began giving undue weight in favor of Anti-Sai Activists and had the audacity to play psychiatrist and implied that I have mental disorders. This from someone who has
1369:
are allowed to engage in on Knowledge (XXG) with impunity? I would like for ArbCom to clarify. Should we also add that Priddy attacked Leo Rebello and Sai devotees and proponents on Indymedia and other forums as
1841:
who actively defends SSB off-Knowledge (XXG) and owns numerous websites and blogs (mainly slanderous and defamatory of SSB's critics) for that purpose, also actively solicits press coverage of his activism
1057:
Reinier van der Sandt attacked me as well. After waiting 4 and half months, I exposed him for using numerous fake names (including my name) on a Yahoo Group (all of which he subsequently admitted to using
2553:
is not true.Andries added this content to the article inspite of being strongly opposed by all the editors see the discussion on the talk page related to this. See the opposition to this in the talk page
70: 1294:. ArbCom needs to clarify whether Pjacobi's comments are correct and whether or not he can include controversial links (containing negative personal stories composed of original research) regarding 1061:). Reinier created 77 attack pages against me in 36 days and 8 additional attack pages, all of which were subsequently deleted due to their bold-faced and easily verifiable lies and defamations 318:"The 'number' of abuse testimonies on critical sites does not at all reflect the true nature of the situation...The 'true number' of people in any way mistreated by SSB is impossible to count" 2316:
Wikisunn is a strong follower of Sathya Sai Baba and is a collaborator of SSS108, Freelanceresearch, and Kkrystian, and openly using Knowledge (XXG) as a platform for advocacy of SSB (
847:
domain. This was recently changed when the ArbCom case gained momentum (another attempt to do damage control, in my opinion): Full Cached Page (view source code to view frames-script)
1417:
the person in question and I have it fully documented as well. Priddy's Anti-Sai sites also contains what I consider defamatory material against me, which has already been discussed
21: 1228:
Pjacobi included Robert Priddy's controversial Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba link on Priddy's wiki-page (and on the edit summary) despite the ArbCom ruling and the warnings of two Admin:
156:. These 6,397 posts were made in 4 and half years on a single Yahoo Group (which does not account for Ekantik's thousands of posts on other groups, forums, blogs, boards, etc.). 2288: 1276: 1199: 1625: 1519:. I do not even know HTML so I cannot be the webmaster of www.exbaba.com. I only started denying that I was the webmaster when this became relevant for the article as per the 1640:
Each opposing faction wants to have maximum exposure to their own POV which they believe is the view of the informed majority and hence should be given majority space as per
2021:
he is certainly in touch with prominent SSB-followers. If anybody would like to see this screen-captured evidence please let me know and I will try to upload it somewhere.
1344:
controversial public figures). Both Hausherr and Chick have one link that goes to their primary homepage. Similarly, Priddy has one link that goes to his primary homepage.
246:. Since that time, I have created the following webpages and blogs to defend myself against his vicious defamations against me and his illogic against Sathya Sai Baba: 73:. /Workshop provides for comment by parties and others as well as Arbitrators. After arriving at proposed principles, findings of fact or remedies, Arbitrators vote at 1684:
SSS108 has the bad habit of burdening uninvolved editors with making editorial decisions in disputes instead of reasonable and serious discussion on the talk page.
1922:
After the Salon.com discussion, SSS108 proceeded to remove more pertinent information from the article, revolving around a journalistic quote in a Dutch newspaper (
1612: 223: 1651:
Repeated and heavy accustions of misparaphrasing misrepresenting sources leads to a tendency of staying very close to the sources which does not yield good prose
415:
criticizing Priddy. Kazlev dealt with this issue his own way by creating attack articles against me (making bogus psychological diagnoses) on his own website (
1712: 1305:
If Pjacobi is correct, then what is there to prevent any critic from re-adding these links on wikipedia, since the ArbCom ruling would not apply to him/her?
2276:
Re-inserting un-encyclopaedic information into the article with "hostile" edit-summaries ("reverting Andries edit. There was NO consensus on talk page") -
1527: 661:
about Priddy, he has become more and more ascerbic in his attacks against me and has made (and continues to make, even as recently as December 12th 2006
625:. In my opinion, this is why Andries is so intent on including Priddy's Anti-Sai website on Priddy's wiki-page. Andries has an Anti-Sai agenda to push. 1636:
The editing dynamics between factions with strongly opposing POVs (mainly SSS108 and Andries) leads to a bad writing style by the following mechanisms
30:
Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please make a header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.
141:
Ekantik uses numerous online names and to get a glimpse of how active and verbose he is in his attacks against Sathya Sai Baba, here are stats from a
1403:
Priddy has been threatened with legal action for defamation by Leo Rebello, who said he filed a million dollar legal suit against Robert Priddy and
1882:
where a larger number of editors disagreed with SSS108's interpretations). These discussions included input from ArbCom members upon RFA requests (
682: 614:(which even included a personal attack against me) and frequently publishes Ekantik's Anti-Sai material and even devoted a link to him (entitled 456:"Just recently, I discovered that Alan created several webpages against me and I decided to respond, hence this blog. Let it be known that I did 444:(pre-Knowledge (XXG) dispute) in response to Kazlev's criticism of me on his website (contrary to his claim that I started my page first). I was 1388:
when they both know I am too close to the dispute to file one. A no-win situation because neither of them are willing to file the AFD himself.
62:
and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user.
1309:
Robert Priddy created his own wiki-page and the very first thing he did was provide a link to his Anti-Sai website attacking Sathya Sai Baba
851: 848: 684: 2225:, where he removed a reliable citation in the article with no justification in the edit summary except for "revering edits of User:Andries". 1926:). After discussing it while edit-warring he quickly degenerated into making personal attacks and accusations of other editors having a POV. 17: 1588: 611:
are all collaborators and Andries Anti-Sai Site frequently publishes Priddy's Anti-Sai material, the most recent being December 12th 2006
1215:
article for 2 years (with numerous inclusions of original research, POV material, external-link spamming and critical material violating
2558:.This claim is not supported by valid sources and has been opposed by all editors and administrator against adding this to the article. 1318:
Although allegedly being a devotee for 18 years, Robert Priddy has not been mentioned or referenced on any official Sai-related website.
1591:), also asserts that SSS108's interpretation of the previous arbcom decision reg. external links is overly strict and unconstructive. 829: 801:
are all Anti-Sai collaborators who publish, support, defend and promote each other through their own individual blogs and websites.
1520: 1460:
way on my page, not attacking either, he took offense and set up an antagonistic (but not actually slanderous) page criticising me
1917:), SSS108 continued to change his position repeatedly. During the discussion SSS108 was also edit-warring (diffs provided below). 1325:
single reliable or reputable source that makes mention to Robert Priddy, in any context, related or unrelated to Sathya Sai Baba.
273: 2256: 2212: 2166: 2029: 1984: 1803: 1775: 1768: 1732: 1674: 1546: 1505: 1471: 1425: 1185: 1142: 805: 629: 495: 380: 1854:). As references to his (often unprovoked) defamatory and slanders have already been provided, I shall not re-list them here. 1113: 1851: 279: 2616:
Ekantik pushes POV.Ekantik added recently biased non NPOV subcategory title to the article though opposed by other editors
316:
On Thatcher's talk-page, Ekantik's bias slipped through his usually very carefully worded and guarded replies and he said,
1616: 1570: 1488: 1391:
Although various editors want to include Priddy's Anti-Sai link, they object and raise a huge fuss about the inclusion of
1083:
Reinier van der Sandt has used the following names on Yahoo Groups to attack Sathya Sai Baba (name listed in search-box):
2582:: Ekantik complaint that I modified archive pages undetected. This is not true. These following edit dated January 10th 1072: 2484:
He criticises me for my intention to fight anti-Sai POV pushing. Well it's good to fight any sort of POV's, isn't it?
2129: 2105: 294:
article. On the talk page, he immediately began accusing me of using Knowledge (XXG) as a battlefield, soapbox, etc.,
1392: 692: 690: 412: 290:
Besides spelling and grammar corrections, Ekantik's edits have revolved solely around controversial material on the
1516: 1441: 1119: 812: 790: 596: 484: 335: 1050:. This is exactly what I have been saying all along. This website is registered under Andries name and he is the 247: 2233: 1582: 1205:
Pjacobi has been a fairly consistent advocate for Andries and Andries has Pjacobi listed on his user-page as a
1078: 648: 1858:
SSS108 has attempted to remove important information from the SSB article by making superficial claims about
1059: 2043: 2036: 2006: 823: 544:
that was signed by all of the involved editors, except Andries. Andries initially disagreed and attacked me
425: 181: 169: 837: 1374: 1062: 418: 1578: 1407: 746: 231: 1696: 2649:. He is highly incivil in his behaviour to other editors differing from his views. ] 26th February 2007 1461: 819: 745:(Old Anti-Sai Site: Deleted for defamatory content with a million dollar legal threat from Leo Rebello 491:
are all collaborators specifically involved in the Sai Controversy, therefore proving his POV and COI.
441: 1657:
The editors know the subject very well and forget that the readers must be introduced to certain terms
1399:
Most of the editors participating in this controversy are either critics or are sympathetic with them.
1077:
Reinier van der Sandt made and posted pictures of Sathya Sai Baba on a Yahoo Group that are revealing
2617: 2555: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2067: 2000:
abused by SSB and whose claims formed the basis of the BBC documentary. He received this information
1834:
article to represent a slanted POV, along with a rundown of the events that led to this ArbCom case.
1789: 469:
in the medical or mental fields whatsoever and who blathers about 'love' and 'letting go of hatred'."
2487:
He criticises me for "admitting" that I am a follower of Bhagwan Sri Sri Sri Sathya Sai Baba. Well,
2347:
Wikisunn has continually demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of WP policies in regards to
1355:(an open forum where anyone can submit any post they want, anytime they want) on Priddy's wiki-page 342:'s Anti-Sai websites/webpages. Just a few examples (respectively): Bottom of page and menu bar, see 1879: 1762: 1726: 432: 2160: 2157: 1893:). Despite disagreement with many editors who also suspected SSS108's agenda with regards to SSB ( 1445: 647:
Robert Priddy is the single most prolific writer against Sathya Sai Baba in the Anti-Sai Movement
2646:
Ekantik strongly criticises me for being a new wikipedia editor and for differing from his views
2005:
representative of the SSB Organisation/SSB himself in a July 2006 issue of their online magazine
1843: 1705:
SSS108 states that the expects the arbcom to make a decision and refusing any serious discussion.
1468: 1467:
On the basis of my experiences described here, I no longer consider SS108 a reliable researcher.
1135: 794: 604: 397: 331: 2344:← blatantly blanking critical content (vandalising the page) that is against his personal views. 2055: 1377: 664:) numerous false and inaccurate accusations against me. The only way I could keep up with these 529:
I created a page about Andries animosity toward Sathya Sai Baba in the previous ArbCom dispute:
1847: 668:
attacks was by creating a blog defending myself (which is much easier to maintain and update).
521: 2249: 2245: 2241: 1564: 1482: 680: 662: 612: 422: 244: 105: 94: 1641: 708:(Personal Home Page with a former Anti-Sai section - Anti-Sai section has since been deleted) 216: 2513: 1890: 1692: 1663:
Additions by outsiders are often amateurish and are often repaired in a quick and dirty way.
651: 619: 346: 2352: 2348: 2229: 2133: 2093: 2063: 2059: 1863: 1827: 1216: 853:. If these cached versions have been updated (as they regularly are), I saved them myself: 2329: 2145:), what to speak of it being "original research" and using the SSB-talkpage as a soapbbox. 2097: 2051: 1831: 1539: 1329: 1295: 1212: 862:
domain, you will notice the complete change and update. If you place your cursor over the
856: 854: 538: 537:
In an effort to build good faith and prevent edit warring, I created a proposition on the
404: 291: 127: 112: 1069: 1749:
I do not believe that SSB is widely described as a philosopher and I request a citation
2441: 2174: 1976:) and has started making personal attacks on me that attack and denigrate my religion ( 1758: 1722: 622: 390: 362: 361:) and his clear antagonism against proponents/devotees (even recently complaining that 349: 2228:
Kkrystian registered a frivolous complaint against me after I brought up a concern of
530: 2530: 2522: 2310: 1574: 1195: 1127: 1044:"ultimate responsibility for this site...is in the hands of Andries Krugers Dagneaux" 782: 641: 637: 608: 488: 408: 339: 243:
Ekantik began his attacks against me first, as evidence on my first response to him:
2564:: Ekantik complained that I showed aggressive behaviour quoting the following links. 1923: 1875: 1871: 1867: 435: 2609: 2501: 2449: 2253: 2218: 2209: 2163: 2075: 2026: 1981: 1945: 1937: 1811: 1800: 1772: 1709: 1671: 1622: 1560: 1543: 1524: 1502: 1478: 1221:"to be one of most constructive and sober members of the 'anti-cult-fighters' here" 1191: 1131: 1123: 798: 786: 600: 592: 509: 502: 480: 476: 429: 327: 101: 90: 2512:
and whenever he finds some information in it that suits his anti-Sai POV he cites
1668:
editors to the SSB article share my views on the matter and make a similar offer.
1163: 255: 208:
Ekantik currently attacks Sathya Sai Baba on the QuickTopic forum (under the name
2092:(Knowledge (XXG) Administrator) strongly chastised Freelanceresearch for being a 1167: 471: 420: 416: 2536:
Ekantik evidence that I am a strong follower of SSB giving the following links (
2466:
and got out of the matter very quickly by changing the topic and by ignoring me.
2293: 2151: 1819: 1444:
I have explained on my website about my journey from devotee to ex-devotee here
1422: 1358:
and included the Indymedia link attacking Sathya Sai Baba on Priddy's talk page
1182: 1139: 802: 626: 492: 377: 82: 161:
Ekantik's blogs specifically against me and my involvement on Knowledge (XXG):
1383:. Now, however, Pjacobi and Andries are saying that I should file another AFD 1333: 1165: 1109:
I created the following index defending myself against Reinier van der Sandt:
1064:. Reinier also attacked Kazlev because he linked to my site and called him my 694: 658: 1161: 356: 251: 213: 1859: 1352: 1169: 353: 1171: 679:
domain and was deleted for defamatory content). Attacks on other webpages:
2412:
to see that Wikisunn has been undetectedly modifying archived talk-pages:
673: 58:
If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence
2550:
The Alleged sex change quoted by Ekantik as proof of my disrupt editing
2089: 1038:
Anti-Sai websites on the internet in 3 languages. Reinier said about the
201: 33:
When placing evidence here, please be considerate of the arbitrators and
2236:
into sub-categories, also unreasonably accusing me of making POV-edits (
2202:"ANTI-SAI WEBSITES MUST NOT BE KEPT IN THIS ARTICLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" 559:
Andries was banned from editing the Robert Priddy article for one month
263:
Ekantik unremittingly refers to Sathya Sai Baba, even to this day, as a
137:, I submit the following evidence that positively refutes these claims: 1181:(an untruth stated on Knowledge (XXG) and by critics on the internet). 1159: 689:
I have defended myself against Priddy on my own website and on a blog:
199: 193: 189: 185: 1173: 434:) and creating his own wiki-mirror of Priddy's Knowledge (XXG) page ( 215:. He has also taken over a Yahoo Group critical of Sathya Sai Baba: 191: 166: 2456:
He unfairly attacked and criticised me and my Knowledge (XXG) edits
1462:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/Kazlev/alan-kazlev.html
1376:, I was considered to be too close to the dipute and was accused of 1328:
Pjacobi argued for Robert Priddy's notability by comparing him with
195: 187: 37:. Long, rambling, or stream-of-conciousness rants are not helpful. 1957:
an image of a temple which he proceeded to "test" on his userpage (
197: 162: 2261:
Kkrystian has been unnecessarily removing requests for citations (
2141:
Making hostile and unsubstantiated claims against critics of SSB (
164: 2601:. But you can also see Andries edited the same page on Jan 15th 2269:, second diff rather serious). Also removed reliable references ( 1746:
Kkrystian writes in the first sentence that SSB is a philosopher.
874:
domain (which belongs to Andries). There is only one page to the
172:
and me on a Yahoo Group for our involvement on Knowledge (XXG):
1995:. He also states that all the materials on his website are his 1654:
None of the editors involved is a skilled native English writer
1446:
http://www.kheper.net/topics/gurus/Anti-SaiBaba_deceptions.html
1436:
My experiences with devotees and ex-devotees of Sathya Sai Baba
1409:. Andries said that his Anti-Sai site underwent a legal threat 1153: 737:
Robert Priddy's deleted websites pertaining to Sathya Sai Baba:
650:. One can view the type of attacks that Priddy made against me 562:
due to violating the ArbCom ruling and two warnings from Admin
1862:
not being a reliable source for either Knowledge (XXG) or for
1554: 700:
Robert Priddy's active websites pertaining to Sathya Sai Baba:
1242:) Priddy's controversial link on Priddy's talk-page as well: 1157: 942:(Active: -now claims this site is his- English Anti-Sai site) 180:
Ekantik's blogs against Sathya Sai Baba and Sai Devotees and
69:
The Arbitrators may analyze evidence and other assertions at
1178: 958:
home.hetnet.nl/mr_9/44/ex_baba/engels/shortnews/GuruGallery/
754:(Newer Anti-Sai Site -12/05- Deleted for defamatory content) 218:. Ekantik advocates for his blog against Sathya Sai Baba on 1269:
and added the link 3 times on his comment for the RFA page
912:
home.hetnet.nl/~comments_on/_the_secret_swami/_sai_baba.htm
2136:
and POV-pushing in relation to critics of Sathya Sai Baba.
2016:
was replicated in the July 2006 issue of the SSB magazine
2012:
websites: A statement by SSS108 regarding the case on his
1302:
wiki-page or talk page relating to SSB or critics of SSB.
512:
was the former webmaster (for 3 years) and is the current
411:
and he waged a very vocal argument about the inclusion of
2080:
step aside and refrain from continuing off-Wiki arguments
1418: 1238:
Pjacobi repeatedly included and re-included (I would say
1155: 2387:
To see threaded discussions of the issues, please see:
1340:
been mentioned in reliable or reputable sources and are
1071:. Reinier Van Der Sandt also attacked Freelanceresearch 47:
This page is not for general discussion - for that, see
2647: 2639: 2636: 2627: 2624: 2621: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2583: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2562:
Response to Aggressive behaviour complaint by Behaviour
2551: 2541: 2537: 2478: 2470: 2463: 2457: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2321: 2317: 2301: 2284: 2277: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2237: 2222: 2205: 2193: 2185: 2142: 2125: 2116: 2109: 2101: 2083: 2079: 2071: 1977: 1973: 1958: 1954: 1941: 1933: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1886: 1883: 1796: 1755: 1750: 1743: 1702: 1688: 1613:
Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons#talk_pages
1604: 1598: 1555:
SSS108's interpretation of the previous arbcom decision
1410: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1359: 1356: 1313: 1312:. Andries salvaged the page from a copyright violation 1310: 1292: 1290: 1288: 1270: 1267: 1265: 1263: 1261: 1259: 1257: 1255: 1253: 1251: 1249: 1247: 1245: 1243: 1233: 1231: 1229: 1223: 1209: 1048: 1046: 585: 582: 580: 578: 576: 574: 572: 570: 568: 565: 563: 560: 551: 548: 545: 542: 370: 359: 320: 309: 305: 303: 301: 299: 297: 295: 135: 124: 122: 120: 109: 42: 1646:
This leads to an unwillingness to summarize viewpoints
1122:
fully promotes, publishes and associates himself with
1014:
Since Reinier van der Sandt now claims that he is the
448:
to publicly defend myself and I clearly stated on the
2283:
Continuing to insert an inappropriate external link (
1010:(Active: Contains the Mail-Forms from Anti-Sai sites) 2556:
Request for Comment: Exceptional Controversial Claim
2495:
was a critic of Bhagwan Sri Sri Sri Sathya Sai Baba.
2393:
Request for Comment: Exceptional Controversial Claim
1691:
SSS108 complains to the arbcom about my behavior on
1361:. Is this the type of encyclopedic information that 1022:
domain (as well as claiming he is the webmaster for
843:
domain was simply a framed page that loaded Andries
2620:. Here are the proofs of his edits to the article. 1797:
10 Feb 2007 ridiculing user:Ekantik's current faith
918:
home.hetnet.nl/~pictures/afbeeldingen/pictures.html
1901:) and questioned his participation in good faith ( 1373:When I filed an AFD for the Robert Priddy article 970:home.hetnet.nl/~vid.eos/videos/cheating_baba01.wmv 672:Priddy attacked me anonymously on his own website 1792:though he was warned not to do so by Thatcher131 55:illustrate behavior which relates to the issues. 2618:Request for Comment: Regarding subcategory title 2401:Request for Comment: Regarding subcategory title 2328:Wikisunn has a history of disruptive editing at 2025:with regards to the editing of the SSB-article. 1321:Since May 2006, no critic or editor can provide 1138:(who has subsequently become friends with him). 1126:(even defending him on Yahoo Groups for years), 403:I have no complaints about Kazlev regarding the 77:. Only Arbitrators may edit /Proposed decision. 2408:At the time of submitting this evidence, I was 2192:Kkrystian and SSS108 are collaborators as this 1365:add to BLPs? Is this the type of behavior that 145:Yahoo Group (specific to the Sai Controversy): 2372:) and aggressive behaviour on the talk-pages ( 2196:shows as if they are both working together to 1972:SSS108 has recently become unduly aggressive ( 1788:SSS108 continues to make personal comments at 1660:Reverts make improvement in writing difficult. 972:(Active: 11 files: Contains Anti-Sai material) 520:Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba website on the internet: 2580:Response to modifying archive pages Complaint 514:"Main Representative, Supervisor and Contact" 126:and the reason he began participating on the 8: 2508:Andries once argues, that we shouldn't cite 1511:Regarding Andries' off-Wikipedian activities 567:because of the following contentious edits: 1679: 1632:Editing dynamics leads to bad writing style 976:home.hetnet.nl/~gurubusters/gurubusters.wmv 475:As evidenced by Kazlev's own webpages, he, 365:, a follower of SSB, should be cited for a 1106:and numerous other names on other forums. 748:- an Anti-Sai Activist in his own right.) 1993:"with no external prompting or guidance" 1510: 1177:I do not own, nor am I affiliated with, 1152:I created the following websites/blogs: 1000:(Active: Provides redirect link for the 758:robert-priddy.fulldisclosure.dyndns.org/ 18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration 2462:He gave a very deceptive account of it 1351:Priddy's notability that he even cited 1211:. Despite Andries past control of the 752:angeltowns2.net/tanik/SaiBaba/index.htm 675:(which was originally published on the 2654:Evidence presented by {your user name} 2548:Response to Disrupt Editing Complaint: 2124:A cursory look at Freelanceresearch's 2096:and thus a POV-pusher (in relation to 1347:Pjacobi went to such great extents to 1219:), Pjacobi said he considered Andries 932:(Active: Framed version that load the 904:(Active: Framed version that load the 460:start this fight. I created this blog 372:- although he does not think he has a 2180:By his own admission, Kkrystian is a 2112:) where Freelanceresearch received a 1380:and not making the AFD in good faith 866:menu buttons, you will see that they 407:article. Kazlev is good friends with 326:Ekantik is published and promoted on 234:) and on numerous other blogs in the 7: 1680:SSS108's habit in dispute resolution 1628:amended 03:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 1521:Knowledge (XXG):Talk_page_guidelines 1275:It is Pjacobi's contention that the 984:(Active: Contains Anti-Sai material) 978:(Active: Contains Anti-Sai material) 966:(Active: Contains Anti-Sai material) 960:(Active: Contains Anti-Sai material) 914:(Active: 9 Files: Anti-Sai material) 898:(Active: Contains Anti-Sai material) 892:(Active: Contains Anti-Sai material) 720:(Active Anti-Sai Norweigian Website) 718:home.no.net/anir/Sai/norsk/index.htm 2217:Kkrystian appears to be hostile to 2148:Freelanceresearch is now levelling 1431:Evidence presented by M Alan Kazlev 982:home.hetnet.nl/~seduced/seduced.wmv 285:other defamatory slurs and libels). 946:home.hetnet.nl/~ex-baba/dutch.html 531:View Previous ArbCom Evidence Page 522:View Previous ArbCom Evidence Page 28: 2150:extremely serious allegations of 2198:"limit the Anti-Sai POV-pushing" 1961:) and later removed. This image 1784:Personal Comments made by SSS108 1740:Removal of request for citation 988:members.tripod.com/the_findings/ 902:home.hetnet.nl/mr_2/121/ex-baba/ 431:), creating his own links page ( 1880:Devoted talk-page for the issue 1114:Reinier Van Der Sandt Deception 2589:, links dated to January 14th 2232:in the matter of his dividing 2200:. See also this edit summary: 954:(Active: German Anti-Sai site) 256:Sanjay Dadlani References Blog 1: 2167:02:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 2104:. This argument continued at 1997:"sole and personal opinions." 1985:03:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 1804:20:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 1617:Talk:Sathya_Sai_Baba/Comments 1577:, another uninvolved editor, 1547:07:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 1528:05:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 1472:05:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 1426:05:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC) 1186:20:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 1143:16:23, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 948:(Active: Dutch Anti-Sai site) 806:17:57, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 743:angeltowns.com/members/tanik/ 630:17:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 496:19:30, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 381:18:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 2257:02:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 2240:). See threaded discussions 2213:17:38, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 2066:and behaved disruptively on 2030:04:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 2018:with negligible differences. 1953:For some reason, SSS108 has 1776:21:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 832:)- is the webmaster for the 2668:{Write your assertion here} 2659:{Write your assertion here} 2106:User_talk:Freelanceresearch 1713:02:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 1675:19:17, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 1626:10:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 1506:10:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 1412:. After this legal threat, 1283:to Andries and me and does 920:(Active: Anti-Sai material) 890:home.hccnet.nl/cmg.vdsandt/ 839:. Until just recently, the 776:members.tripod.com/saisat0/ 252:Sanjay Dadlani Exposed Blog 2690: 1517:user:Reinier van der Sandt 1367:"editors in good standing" 1363:"editors in good standing" 1336:(both who —unlike Priddy— 1008:home.wanadoo.nl/~rvdsandt/ 990:(Active: Redirects to the 926:(Active: Anti-Sai website) 271:"faggot guru child rapist" 2477:fed me false information 2432:, and many more (See his 1496:General remarks and scope 220:Gaudiya-Repercussions.com 2234:Category:Sathya Sai Baba 2074:). After being asked by 1533:Regarding M. Alan Kazlev 1287:apply to other editors: 998:members.lycos.nl/EXBABA/ 940:home.hetnet.nl/~ex-baba/ 778:(Anti-Sai Site: Deleted) 772:(Anti-Sai Site: Deleted) 766:(Anti-Sai Site: Deleted) 764:spaceports.com/~saiinfo/ 760:(Anti-Sai Site: Deleted) 547:, then partially agreed 224:sample page, one of many 134:because of various RFCs 2510:Sathyam Shivam Sundaram 2182:devoted follower of SSB 2102:warned her with a block 1924:See threaded discussion 818:Reinier van der Sandt - 730:home.chello.no/~reirob/ 265:"homosexual paedophile" 115:article, his claims to 2521:Evidence presented by 2440:Evidence presented by 2289:previous ArbCom ruling 2094:single purpose account 1810:Evidence presented by 1756:17:36, 15 January 2007 1751:21:40, 14 January 2007 1744:20:25, 14 January 2007 1477:Evidence presented by 878:site listed on Google 850:and Text Cached Page 732:(Active Anti-Sai Site) 726:(Active Anti-Sai Site) 714:(Active Anti-Sai Site) 369:-conflict of interest 228:Gaurasundara's Musings 81:Evidence presented by 2585:, dated January 13th 2252:for more information. 1944:(about Administrator 1936:(about Administrator 1703:02:39, 8 January 2007 1697:talk:Narayana Kasturi 1695:before discussion at 1605:03:52, 1 January 2007 1120:Reinier van der Sandt 1016:"technical webmaster" 964:rfjvds.dds.nl/videos/ 870:link directly to the 813:Reinier van der Sandt 791:Reinier van der Sandt 712:home.no.net/anir/Sai/ 706:home.no.net/rrpriddy/ 652:here, on my Talk Page 597:Reinier van der Sandt 485:Reinier van der Sandt 440:I originally created 336:Reinier van der Sandt 2597:, dated January 15th 2593:, dated January 15th 2156:on off-Wiki forums: 2082:, Freelanceresearch 2068:Talk:Sathya Sai Baba 1876:Threaded discussion3 1872:Threaded discussion2 1868:Threaded discussion1 1790:talk:Sathya Sai Baba 1689:16:09 7 January 2007 1207:"trustworthy editor" 724:home.no.net/abacusa/ 657:As this pertains to 550:, attacked me again 100:As this pertains to 1419:above, on this page 896:exbaba.startmee.nl/ 770:metasci.tripod.com/ 119:being a POV editor 60:in your own section 2287:that violates the 1440:In addition to my 618:) on the menu bar 236:"comment sections" 210:"Sai Baba EXPOSED" 168:. He also attacks 130:article was based 111:) presence on the 75:/Proposed decision 2397:In the news again 2044:Freelanceresearch 2037:Freelanceresearch 1573:) in the article 1179:sathyasaibaba.com 1042:domain, that the 1040:hetnet.nl/~exbaba 1020:hetnet.nl/~exbaba 934:hetnet.nl/~exbaba 906:hetnet.nl/~exbaba 872:hetnet.nl/~exbaba 845:hetnet.nl/~exbaba 452:post on my blog: 426:Freelanceresearch 352:, bottom of page 182:Freelanceresearch 170:Freelanceresearch 22:Sathya Sai Baba 2 2681: 2514:Narayana Kasturi 2389:Wikisunn's edits 1967: 1966: 1693:Narayana Kasturi 1599:31 December 2006 1066:"moronic friend" 2689: 2688: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2670: 2661: 2656: 2613: 2534: 2526: 2505: 2453: 2445: 2330:Sathya Sai Baba 2314: 2178: 2098:Sathya Sai Baba 2052:Sathya Sai Baba 2040: 1852:press release 3 1848:press release 2 1844:press release 1 1832:Sathya Sai Baba 1823: 1815: 1786: 1737: 1682: 1634: 1601: 1557: 1540:Sathya Sai Baba 1535: 1513: 1498: 1493: 1453: 1451:Regarding SS108 1438: 1433: 1330:Tilman Hausherr 1296:Sathya Sai Baba 1213:Sathya Sai Baba 1203: 1150: 1148:Self Disclosure 1034:), he runs the 816: 677:angeltowns2.net 666:ever-increasing 645: 539:Sathya Sai Baba 506: 405:Sathya Sai Baba 401: 292:Sathya Sai Baba 128:Sathya Sai Baba 113:Sathya Sai Baba 98: 86: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 2687: 2685: 2676: 2669: 2666: 2660: 2657: 2655: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2643: 2642: 2631: 2630: 2612: 2606: 2533: 2527: 2525: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2504: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2491:admitted that 2485: 2482: 2469:He lied to me 2467: 2460: 2452: 2446: 2444: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2405: 2404: 2385: 2345: 2313: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2281: 2274: 2259: 2226: 2215: 2177: 2175:User:Kkrystian 2171: 2170: 2169: 2146: 2138: 2137: 2121: 2120: 2039: 2033: 1988: 1987: 1969: 1968: 1950: 1949: 1928: 1927: 1919: 1918: 1837:SSS108 is an 1822: 1816: 1814: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1753: 1747: 1736: 1719: 1717: 1707: 1706: 1700: 1681: 1678: 1665: 1664: 1661: 1658: 1655: 1652: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1633: 1630: 1620: 1619: 1608: 1607: 1596: 1594:See complaint 1579:67.117.130.181 1556: 1553: 1551: 1534: 1531: 1512: 1509: 1497: 1494: 1492: 1475: 1452: 1449: 1442:statement here 1437: 1434: 1432: 1429: 1405:angeltowns.com 1401: 1400: 1397: 1389: 1371: 1345: 1326: 1319: 1316: 1202: 1189: 1149: 1146: 1117: 1116: 1012: 1011: 1005: 995: 985: 979: 973: 967: 961: 955: 949: 943: 937: 927: 921: 915: 909: 899: 893: 815: 809: 780: 779: 773: 767: 761: 755: 749: 734: 733: 727: 721: 715: 709: 687: 686: 644: 634: 633: 632: 589: 588: 556: 555: 534: 533: 526: 525: 505: 499: 467:no credentials 400: 394: 387:Dec. 28th 2006 384: 383: 323: 322: 313: 312: 287: 286: 260: 259: 240: 239: 205: 204: 177: 176: 158: 157: 97: 87: 85: 79: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2686: 2677: 2674: 2667: 2665: 2658: 2653: 2648: 2645: 2644: 2640: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2625: 2622: 2619: 2615: 2614: 2611: 2607: 2605: 2603: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2581: 2577: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2557: 2552: 2549: 2545: 2543: 2539: 2532: 2531:User:Wikisunn 2528: 2524: 2523:User:Wikisunn 2520: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2506: 2503: 2499: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2483: 2480: 2476: 2475:intentionally 2472: 2468: 2465: 2461: 2459: 2455: 2454: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2434: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2323: 2319: 2312: 2311:User:Wikisunn 2308: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2279: 2275: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2258: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2214: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2187: 2183: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2165: 2161: 2158: 2155: 2153: 2147: 2144: 2140: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2126:contributions 2123: 2122: 2118: 2117:block warning 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2100:article) and 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2086: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2054:who violated 2053: 2049: 2045: 2042: 2041: 2038: 2034: 2032: 2031: 2028: 2022: 2019: 2015: 2009: 2007: 2003: 1998: 1994: 1986: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1964: 1963:belongs to me 1960: 1956: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1840: 1835: 1833: 1829: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1802: 1798: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1791: 1783: 1777: 1774: 1770: 1767: 1764: 1760: 1757: 1754: 1752: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1741: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1731: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1718: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1704: 1701: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1677: 1676: 1673: 1669: 1662: 1659: 1656: 1653: 1650: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1631: 1629: 1627: 1624: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1600: 1595: 1592: 1590: 1587: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1575:Robert Priddy 1572: 1569: 1566: 1562: 1552: 1549: 1548: 1545: 1541: 1532: 1530: 1529: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1508: 1507: 1504: 1495: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1474: 1473: 1470: 1469:M Alan Kazlev 1465: 1463: 1459: 1450: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1435: 1430: 1428: 1427: 1424: 1420: 1415: 1411: 1408: 1406: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1382: 1379: 1375: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1324: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1291: 1289: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1277:ArbCom Ruling 1273: 1271: 1268: 1266: 1264: 1262: 1260: 1258: 1256: 1254: 1252: 1250: 1248: 1246: 1244: 1241: 1236: 1234: 1232: 1230: 1226: 1224: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1208: 1201: 1200:ArbCom Ruling 1197: 1196:Robert Priddy 1193: 1190: 1188: 1187: 1184: 1180: 1175: 1174: 1172: 1170: 1168: 1166: 1164: 1162: 1160: 1158: 1156: 1154: 1147: 1145: 1144: 1141: 1137: 1136:M Alan Kazlev 1133: 1129: 1128:Robert Priddy 1125: 1121: 1115: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1107: 1105: 1103: 1101: 1099: 1097: 1095: 1093: 1091: 1089: 1087: 1085: 1081: 1079: 1075: 1073: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1060: 1055: 1053: 1049: 1047: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1009: 1006: 1003: 999: 996: 993: 989: 986: 983: 980: 977: 974: 971: 968: 965: 962: 959: 956: 953: 952:exbaba.de.tf/ 950: 947: 944: 941: 938: 935: 931: 928: 925: 922: 919: 916: 913: 910: 907: 903: 900: 897: 894: 891: 888: 887: 886: 882: 880: 877: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 855: 852: 849: 846: 842: 838: 835: 831: 828: 825: 821: 814: 810: 808: 807: 804: 800: 796: 795:M Alan Kazlev 792: 788: 784: 783:Robert Priddy 777: 774: 771: 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 740: 739: 738: 731: 728: 725: 722: 719: 716: 713: 710: 707: 704: 703: 702: 701: 697: 695: 693: 691: 685: 683: 681: 678: 674: 671: 670: 669: 667: 663: 660: 655: 653: 649: 643: 639: 638:Robert Priddy 635: 631: 628: 624: 620: 617: 613: 610: 609:Robert Priddy 606: 605:M Alan Kazlev 602: 598: 594: 591: 590: 586: 583: 581: 579: 577: 575: 573: 571: 569: 566: 564: 561: 558: 557: 552: 549: 546: 543: 540: 536: 535: 532: 528: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 508: 507: 504: 500: 498: 497: 494: 490: 489:Robert Priddy 486: 482: 478: 473: 472: 470: 468: 463: 459: 453: 451: 447: 443: 438: 436: 433: 430: 427: 423: 421: 419: 417: 414: 410: 409:Robert Priddy 406: 399: 398:M Alan Kazlev 395: 393: 392: 388: 382: 379: 375: 371: 368: 364: 360: 357: 355:, whole page 354: 351: 347: 345: 341: 340:Robert Priddy 337: 333: 332:M Alan Kazlev 329: 325: 324: 321: 319: 315: 314: 310: 306: 304: 302: 300: 298: 296: 293: 289: 288: 284: 280: 278: 274: 272: 268: 266: 262: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 242: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 214: 211: 207: 206: 202: 200: 198: 196: 194: 192: 190: 188: 186: 183: 179: 178: 174: 171: 167: 165: 163: 160: 159: 155: 153: 151: 149: 147: 144: 140: 139: 138: 136: 133: 129: 125: 123: 121: 118: 114: 110: 107: 103: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 78: 76: 72: 67: 63: 61: 56: 52: 50: 45: 43: 38: 36: 31: 23: 19: 2675: 2671: 2662: 2610:User:Ekantik 2579: 2578: 2561: 2560: 2547: 2546: 2535: 2509: 2502:User:Andries 2492: 2488: 2474: 2450:User:Ekantik 2409: 2315: 2297: 2221:as per this 2201: 2197: 2181: 2179: 2149: 2113: 2084: 2047: 2046:is openly a 2023: 2017: 2013: 2010: 2001: 1996: 1992: 1989: 1962: 1839:SSB activist 1838: 1836: 1824: 1787: 1765: 1729: 1716: 1708: 1683: 1670: 1666: 1635: 1621: 1593: 1585: 1567: 1558: 1550: 1536: 1514: 1499: 1485: 1466: 1457: 1454: 1439: 1413: 1404: 1402: 1366: 1362: 1348: 1341: 1337: 1322: 1304: 1299: 1284: 1280: 1274: 1239: 1237: 1227: 1220: 1206: 1204: 1176: 1151: 1118: 1108: 1082: 1076: 1065: 1056: 1051: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1032:exbaba.de.tf 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1013: 1007: 1001: 997: 991: 987: 981: 975: 969: 963: 957: 951: 945: 939: 933: 929: 923: 917: 911: 905: 901: 895: 889: 883: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 844: 840: 833: 826: 820:145.53.1.234 817: 781: 775: 769: 763: 757: 751: 742: 736: 735: 729: 723: 717: 711: 705: 699: 698: 688: 676: 665: 656: 646: 615: 517: 513: 474: 466: 461: 457: 455: 454: 449: 445: 442:this webpage 439: 402: 386: 385: 373: 366: 343: 317: 282: 276: 270: 264: 235: 227: 219: 209: 142: 131: 116: 106:Gaurasundara 104:(sockpuppet 99: 95:Gaurasundara 68: 64: 59: 57: 53: 46: 41:this form: 39: 34: 32: 29: 2152:paedophilia 2014:own website 1891:Fred Bauder 1559:Apart from 1393:my webpages 1281:exclusively 1279:is binding 1054:webmaster. 924:exbaba.com/ 413:my webpages 2154:against me 2088:to do so. 1866:articles ( 1721:Regarding 1334:Jack Chick 1240:"spamming" 1024:exbaba.com 1002:exbaba.com 992:exbaba.com 930:exbaba.nl/ 876:exbaba.com 864:exbaba.com 860:exbaba.com 841:exbaba.com 834:exbaba.com 811:Regarding 636:Regarding 541:talk page 501:Regarding 450:very first 396:Regarding 376:himself). 277:"murderer" 248:On My Site 89:Regarding 35:be concise 2442:Kkrystian 2302:And again 2130:talk page 1860:Salon.com 1759:Kkrystian 1723:Kkrystian 1515:See also 1353:Indymedia 1028:exbaba.nl 616:"Dadlani" 363:Kkrystian 344:"Dadlani" 102:Ekantik's 71:/Workshop 49:talk page 2516:'s book. 2132:reveals 2056:WP:POINT 2048:follower 1955:uploaded 1887:example2 1884:example1 1769:contribs 1733:contribs 1611:Threads 1589:contribs 1571:contribs 1489:contribs 1458:positive 1396:myself). 1378:WP:POINT 1323:even one 1198:and the 1052:de facto 1018:for the 830:contribs 642:ProEdits 516:for the 283:numerous 20:‎ | 2410:shocked 2399:, and 2254:Ekantik 2219:Andries 2210:Ekantik 2164:Ekantik 2110:example 2085:refused 2076:Pjacobi 2072:example 2027:Ekantik 1982:Ekantik 1946:Pjacobi 1938:Savidan 1828:control 1812:Ekantik 1801:Andries 1773:Andries 1710:Andries 1672:Andries 1642:WP:NPOV 1623:Andries 1561:Pjacobi 1544:Andries 1525:Andries 1503:Andries 1479:Andries 1192:Pjacobi 1132:Andries 1124:Ekantik 1036:largest 936:domain) 908:domain) 836:domain 799:Ekantik 787:Andries 659:my blog 601:Ekantik 593:Andries 518:largest 510:Andries 503:Andries 481:Andries 477:Ekantik 328:Andries 281:(among 226:), his 91:Ekantik 2353:WP:MOS 2349:WP:BLP 2298:Update 2294:SSS108 2230:WP:COI 2134:WP:SPA 2114:second 2064:WP:NPA 2060:WP:AGF 2002:before 1864:WP:BLP 1820:SSS108 1423:SSS108 1217:WP:BLP 1183:SSS108 1140:SSS108 803:SSS108 627:SSS108 623:Update 554:views. 493:SSS108 446:forced 424:) and 391:Update 378:SSS108 350:Update 230:blog ( 143:single 83:SSS108 2599:diff5 2595:diff4 2591:diff3 2587:diff2 2574:diff3 2570:diff2 2566:diff1 2542:diff2 2538:diff1 2430:diff5 2426:diff4 2422:diff3 2418:diff2 2414:diff1 2382:diff3 2378:diff2 2374:diff1 2370:diff4 2366:diff3 2362:diff2 2358:diff1 2342:diff3 2338:diff2 2334:diff1 2322:diff2 2318:diff1 2285:diff) 2267:diff2 2263:diff1 2250:three 1942:diff2 1934:diff1 1915:diff4 1911:diff3 1907:diff2 1903:diff1 1899:diff2 1895:diff1 1889:from 1370:well? 1349:prove 1342:known 1004:site) 994:site) 462:after 374:"COI" 367:"COI" 132:soley 16:< 2479:here 2473:and 2471:here 2464:here 2458:here 2351:and 2296:. - 2278:diff 2271:diff 2248:and 2238:diff 2223:diff 2206:diff 2194:diff 2186:diff 2143:diff 2128:and 1978:diff 1974:diff 1959:diff 1878:), ( 1874:), ( 1870:), ( 1850:), ( 1846:), ( 1830:the 1763:talk 1727:talk 1615:and 1583:talk 1565:talk 1483:talk 1414:both 1338:have 1332:and 1134:and 1030:and 824:talk 797:and 640:aka 607:and 487:and 338:and 275:and 93:aka 2608:On 2529:On 2500:On 2448:On 2324:). 2309:On 2246:two 2242:one 2188:). 2173:On 2090:JzG 2078:to 2050:of 2035:On 1980:). 1940:), 1818:On 1300:any 1298:on 1285:not 1225:. 868:all 458:not 437:). 232:Ref 117:not 51:. 2626:, 2623:, 2576:. 2568:, 2540:, 2493:he 2489:he 2435:). 2428:, 2424:, 2420:, 2416:, 2395:, 2391:, 2380:, 2376:, 2368:, 2364:, 2360:, 2340:, 2336:, 2332:: 2320:, 2300:: 2273:). 2265:, 2244:, 2208:) 2162:. 2159:, 2062:, 2058:, 2008:. 1948:). 1913:, 1909:, 1905:, 1897:, 1799:. 1542:. 1523:. 1421:. 1272:. 1235:. 1194:, 1130:, 1080:. 1074:. 1026:, 881:. 793:, 789:, 785:, 696:. 654:. 621:→ 603:, 599:, 595:, 483:, 479:, 389:→ 348:→ 334:, 330:, 269:, 254:, 250:, 212:) 184:: 108:: 44:. 2641:. 2629:. 2481:. 2403:. 2356:( 2304:. 2280:. 2204:( 2184:( 2119:. 2108:( 2070:( 1965:( 1842:( 1766:· 1761:( 1735:) 1730:· 1725:( 1699:. 1597:* 1586:· 1581:( 1568:· 1563:( 1491:) 1486:· 1481:( 1315:. 827:· 822:( 587:. 524:. 428:( 311:. 258:. 238:. 222:( 203:. 175:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration
Sathya Sai Baba 2

talk page
/Workshop
/Proposed decision
SSS108
Ekantik
Gaurasundara
Ekantik's
Gaurasundara

Sathya Sai Baba



Sathya Sai Baba









Freelanceresearch

Freelanceresearch

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.