562:, stating their intent that if a certain quantity of users ask for them to be recalled, the administrator may choose to resign voluntarily, or to engage in a discussion of such resignation. However, requests have been sporadic with only two in the last ten years, and it is unclear that an administrator who made themselves open to recall is bound to that promise. A list of such requests and their outcomes can be found at
34:
119:
191:
Many users have voluntarily relinquished adminship, and historically there were cases where adminship was suspended temporarily to enforce a cooling-off period in conflicts between admins. Some nominally voluntary de-adminships have taken place in the presence of a growing consensus that adminship
183:
Through 2003, there had been only one case where adminship was revoked. Since 2004, the
Arbitration Committee has dealt with cases involving abuse of adminship, both through review of de-adminships imposed in emergencies and through removal of adminship as a remedy in an arbitration proceeding.
187:
Throughout the history of the project, there has been a convention that adminship may be removed involuntarily only in cases of clear abuse. Users have proposed a variety of processes to ensure that admins have the continued support of the community, but none has gained widespread acceptance.
539:
289:
523:
305:
329:
297:
208:
193:
502:
401:
250:
321:
563:
281:
273:
277:- March 2021; While not strictly a de-adminship proposal, the proposal provided a process by which an administrator might be removed after ten years. Did not achieve consensus.
268:
A substantial number of proposals for alternative or expanded desysopping protocols have been considered by the community. In general, none have achieved a consensus to enact.
385:
633:
559:
497:– occasionally, requests for revocation of adminship have been made here, but all have either been removed out of hand or voted down. Examples of historical interest are at
457:
369:
173:
668:
196:
that users voluntarily resigning their adminship in such a circumstance may not automatically request it back and must go through the regular processes, or are subject to
531:
498:
449:
434:
469:
313:
526:
decided on removal of adminship after a year of total inactivity, recoverable at any time upon request. In
December 2012, the requirement to undergo a renewal RfA
519:
515:
345:
535:
527:
57:; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Knowledge (XXG)'s norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of
514:
There have also been a number of policy proposals to revoke adminship from user accounts of people who no longer participate in the project, for example
622:
377:
177:
215:
20:
663:
337:
653:
552:
477:
638:
223:
54:
462:
617:
577:
421:
219:
149:
530:
on former admins who have been inactive for more than three years. A set of proposals to increase the minimum activity requirements
611:
393:
50:
538:
to include disuse of admin tools for five years, and in April 2022 a further condition of making at least 100 edits in five years
128:
361:
658:
441:
42:
489:– during its short run in 2004, quickpolls were used to address admin disputes. Many of these were retaliatory listings.
481:– an April 2004 proposal for self-initiated periodic review of admin status that generated little interest or discussion
606:
581:
413:– a short lived proposal in September 2006 that five admins could demand another admin be forced to go through a new
153:
429:
207:
at any time. Some desysops by the
Arbitration Committee have also included a right of appeal to the Committee.
197:
417:
to keep their status. After a lot of criticism on its talk page, it was made historical within three weeks.
628:
542:, to be effective from January 2023 and resulting in an unusually large number of de-admins in that month.
485:
169:
409:
157:
62:
58:
72:
473:– a series of proposals from September 2004, each voted on and rejected by a margin of about 2 to 1
570:
256:
137:
433:– a complex proposal was struck down in August 2006, but resulted in a different proposal at
601:
168:. As of 2024, the only way for the community to directly remove an adminstrator's rights is
576:
Otherwise, adminship may only be involuntarily removed from an active administrator by the
522:. These early proposals lacked widespread support, but an RfC running through June 2011 at
493:
414:
204:
161:
290:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/2019 community sentiment on binding desysop procedure
242:
596:
647:
534:
in
December 2015. In March 2018, the standard of inactivity requiring a new RfA
524:
Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (proposals)/suspend sysop rights of inactive admins
306:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators/RfC for BARC - a community desysopping process
330:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for
Comment/Community de-adminship proof of concept
192:
may not be appropriate for the affected user. The
Arbitration Committee has
203:
With very rare, explicitly noted exceptions, users are free to reapply at
165:
214:
For information about how de-adminship is handled on other projects, see
317:– November 2014; proposal to appoint administrators and to remove rights
445:– swiftly struck down in May 2006 as a rehashing of previous proposals.
19:"WP:RFDA" redirects here. For Redirects for discussion archives, see
298:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators/RfC for binding administrator recall
503:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Jasonr (reconfirmation)
402:
Knowledge (XXG):Fully
Uncompelled Binding Administrator Recall
152:, as well as (in theory although almost never in practice) by
113:
28:
251:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for review of administrative actions
322:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators/RfC for an Admin Review Board
127:
A community-based process for removing adminship has been a
564:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators open to recall/Past requests
551:
Voluntary self-revocation of adminship can be requested at
465:
process, and which was rejected by a margin of over 2 to 1.
282:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Desysop Policy (2021)
274:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Adminship term length
200:
discretion, depending on the timing of the resignation.
172:; also as of 2024, this power has never been exercised.
386:
Knowledge (XXG):Community enforced administrator recall
353:
101:
94:
87:
80:
560:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) administrators open to recall
458:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for de-adminship/Old proposal
370:
Knowledge (XXG):Removing administrator rights/Proposal
499:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/The
Cunctator
450:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for de-adminship/Proposal 2
435:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrator recall (2006 proposal)
470:
461:– a March 2005 proposal which closely emulated the
314:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrative
Standards Commission
569:An admin who is indefinitely community sitebanned
211:there was also a right of appeal to Jimbo Wales.
520:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Inactive2
516:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Inactive1
234:Revocation of adminship was previously handled:
437:which includes the ArbCom as a check on abuses.
346:Knowledge (XXG):Guide to Community de-adminship
222:. For a list of restorations of adminship, see
634:Knowledge (XXG) administrators open to recall
623:Knowledge (XXG):Removing administrator rights
378:Knowledge (XXG):Admin Accountability Alliance
8:
216:Knowledge (XXG):Adminship in other languages
21:Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log
338:Knowledge (XXG):Request for Admin Sanctions
546:Current methods of requesting de-adminship
176:will voluntarily stand for reconfirmation
669:Matters related to requests for adminship
478:Knowledge (XXG):Confirmation of sysophood
639:Knowledge (XXG):Standing reconfirmations
553:Knowledge (XXG):Bureaucrats' noticeboard
224:Knowledge (XXG):List of resysopped users
55:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
558:Some admins have added their names to
463:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
618:Knowledge (XXG):Former administrators
422:Knowledge (XXG):Temporary Deadminship
220:Knowledge (XXG):Former administrators
7:
612:Knowledge (XXG):Administrator Review
394:Knowledge (XXG):Removal of adminship
354:Amendment of successful RFA closures
218:. For a list of past desysops, see
664:Knowledge (XXG) dispute resolution
14:
654:Knowledge (XXG) information pages
442:Knowledge (XXG):Adminship renewal
170:to indefinitely ban them sitewide
117:
32:
26:Knowledge (XXG) information page
16:Knowledge (XXG) information page
362:User:EVula/opining/RfA overhaul
154:the Wikimedia Foundation office
607:Knowledge (XXG):Administrators
453:– a proposal made in June 2005
1:
430:Knowledge (XXG):Admin recall
571:will have adminship removed
178:under certain circumstances
685:
629:Knowledge (XXG):RFA reform
486:Knowledge (XXG):Quickpolls
70:
18:
659:Knowledge (XXG) adminship
410:Knowledge (XXG):Ostracism
140:status may be revoked (a
125:This page in a nutshell:
578:Arbitration Committee
415:Request for Adminship
150:Arbitration Committee
238:On the mailing list.
158:MediaWiki developers
51:encyclopedic article
174:Some administrators
264:Proposed processes
166:Wikimedia stewards
162:in emergency cases
129:perennial proposal
597:mailing-list post
209:Prior to May 2023
135:
134:
112:
111:
676:
599:
405:– September 2007
333:– September 2012
230:Former processes
121:
120:
114:
104:
97:
90:
83:
43:information page
36:
35:
29:
684:
683:
679:
678:
677:
675:
674:
673:
644:
643:
595:
591:
548:
512:
510:Inactive admins
381:– December 2007
349:– February 2010
325:– November 2014
285:– February 2021
266:
232:
118:
108:
107:
100:
93:
86:
79:
75:
67:
66:
33:
27:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
682:
680:
672:
671:
666:
661:
656:
646:
645:
642:
641:
636:
631:
626:
620:
615:
609:
604:
590:
587:
586:
585:
574:
567:
556:
547:
544:
511:
508:
507:
506:
490:
482:
474:
466:
454:
446:
438:
426:
418:
406:
398:
397:– October 2007
390:
389:– October 2007
382:
374:
373:– October 2008
366:
365:– January 2009
358:
350:
342:
334:
326:
318:
310:
302:
294:
293:– October 2019
286:
278:
265:
262:
261:
260:
257:By Jimbo Wales
254:
246:
239:
231:
228:
194:taken the view
133:
132:
122:
110:
109:
106:
105:
98:
91:
84:
76:
71:
68:
48:
47:
39:
37:
25:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
681:
670:
667:
665:
662:
660:
657:
655:
652:
651:
649:
640:
637:
635:
632:
630:
627:
625:for processes
624:
621:
619:
616:
613:
610:
608:
605:
603:
598:
593:
592:
588:
583:
579:
575:
572:
568:
565:
561:
557:
554:
550:
549:
545:
543:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
509:
504:
500:
496:
495:
491:
488:
487:
483:
480:
479:
475:
472:
471:
467:
464:
460:
459:
455:
452:
451:
447:
444:
443:
439:
436:
432:
431:
427:
425:– August 2006
424:
423:
419:
416:
412:
411:
407:
404:
403:
399:
396:
395:
391:
388:
387:
383:
380:
379:
375:
372:
371:
367:
364:
363:
359:
356:
355:
351:
348:
347:
343:
340:
339:
335:
332:
331:
327:
324:
323:
319:
316:
315:
311:
308:
307:
303:
301:– August 2015
300:
299:
295:
292:
291:
287:
284:
283:
279:
276:
275:
271:
270:
269:
263:
258:
255:
253:
252:
247:
244:
240:
237:
236:
235:
229:
227:
225:
221:
217:
212:
210:
206:
201:
199:
195:
189:
185:
181:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:Administrator
130:
126:
123:
116:
115:
103:
99:
96:
92:
89:
85:
82:
78:
77:
74:
69:
64:
60:
56:
53:, nor one of
52:
49:It is not an
46:
44:
38:
31:
30:
22:
614:- Historical
584:for details.
540:was approved
536:was modified
532:was rejected
513:
492:
484:
476:
468:
456:
448:
440:
428:
420:
408:
400:
392:
384:
376:
368:
360:
352:
344:
336:
328:
320:
312:
309:– July 2015.
304:
296:
288:
280:
272:
267:
249:
243:village pump
233:
213:
202:
190:
186:
182:
146:de-adminning
145:
141:
136:
124:
40:
602:Jimbo Wales
528:was imposed
341:- July 2012
142:desysopping
41:This is an
648:Categories
594:June 2006
357:– May 2009
198:bureaucrat
148:) by the
73:Shortcuts
59:consensus
589:See also
102:WP:FIRED
95:WP:DESYS
241:On the
160:, and,
81:WP:RFDA
63:vetting
580:; see
494:WP:RFA
205:WP:RFA
88:WP:DES
582:here
518:and
501:and
61:and
600:by
248:At
144:or
650::
226:.
180:.
164:,
156:,
573:.
566:.
555:.
505:.
259:.
245:.
131:.
65:.
45:.
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.