1019:. Tables don't work well on various devices (hand-held screens, omitted when using Knowledge (XXG)'s PDF export function,... and the "sortability" advantage is lost in some cases). For that reason it is often a good idea to retain a structured list (or bullet list, or numbered list, ...) even when a table is provided with basically the same content. However, having two list pages with roughly the same content, one of them presenting the list content in a "sortable table" format, and the other not using table syntax for the list content, is only possible when:
35:
93:
412:
positive and negative opinions, and/or rebuttals, if available, and the original article should contain a neutral summary of the split article. There is currently no consensus whether a "Criticism of..." article is always a POV fork, but many criticism articles nevertheless suffer from POV problems.
384:
The most blatant POV forks are those which insert consensus-dodging content under a title that should clearly be made a redirect to an existing article; in some cases, editors have converted existing redirects into content forks. However, a new article can be a POV fork even if its title is not a
296:
Creating such forks can be unintentional or intentional. Although
Knowledge (XXG) contributors are reminded to check to make sure there is not an existing article on the subject before they start a new article, there is always the chance they will forget, or that they will search in good faith but
265:
It becomes a problem when there are two articles about the exact same thing, or any two pages of the same type covering the same thing as each other, such as two outlines, two portals, two templates, two categories, etc. Imagine if 100 editors each wrote a separate article on the dog and
Knowledge
984:
One technique sometimes used to reach consensus on difficult articles is to create a temporary copy which people can then edit to show others proposed rephrasing or other changes. This can be helpful for controversial subjects or controversial changes; editors can show others exactly what their
821:
However, there is a risk for article spinoffs to become POV forks. If a statement is inadmissible for content policy reasons at an article ], then it is also inadmissible at a spinoff ]. Spinoffs are intended to improve readability and navigation, not to evade
Knowledge (XXG)'s content policies.
495:
There is a difference between article forking within
Knowledge (XXG) and the legitimate practice of project-level forking. The latter occurs when someone wishes to create their own wiki, according to their own standards and practices, but they want to use Knowledge (XXG)'s content as a starting
548:
Content forks that are different page types covering the same subject are acceptable. Articles are not the only type of page on
Knowledge (XXG) that cover subjects. Other subject-based page types include outlines, navigation footer templates, navigation sidebar templates, categories, portals,
348:
In contrast POV forks generally arise when contributors disagree about the content of an article or other page. Instead of resolving that disagreement by consensus, another version of the article (or another article on the same subject) is created to be developed according to a particular
793:
Article splits are permissible only if written from a neutral point of view. They must not be an attempt to evade the consensus process at another article. On the other hand, having a separate article on a controversial incident may give undue weight to that incident. For this reason,
1000:; however, accidents happen and those who think they have found a POV fork, in turn, should check to see whether the article title indicates a temporary subpage and whether the talk page of the main article indicates that this is a place to work on consensus rather than to dodge it.
161:
When a content fork occurs by the creation of a pair of pages of the same type (such as two articles, or two templates, or two outlines) on the same subject, it results in two different versions of the same thing, which is unacceptable. The new page in such a pair is called a
1044:
Also, provide a link to the differently formatted list high up on the page, preferably before the TOC or first section header, so that readers can switch to the other format if that works better for the device with which they are accessing the list. Example (see
988:
However, just as "spinout" articles have sometimes been mistaken for POV forks, temporary subpages have been mistaken for POV forks. Care should be taken on both sides to minimize such mistakes. New drafts should be written in the "Draft:", "User:" or "Talk:"
269:
A page that covers the same subject as another page of the same type is often called a "redundant content fork". The most common occurrence of redundant content forks results in two articles on the same thing; the extra one is a "redundant article fork".
301:. If you suspect a redundant article fork, check with people who watch the respective articles and participate in talk page discussions to see if the fork was justified. If the content fork was unjustified, the more recent article should be
372:
Since what qualifies as a "POV fork" can itself be based on a POV judgement, it may be best not to refer to the fork as "POV" except in extreme cases of persistent disruptive editing. Instead, apply
Knowledge (XXG)'s policy that requires a
549:
glossaries, indexes, lists, etc. Each type is designed to provide particular benefits. However, they, including corresponding articles, should not contradict each other, and any contradictory statements should be corrected or removed.
377:: regardless of the reasons for making the fork, it still must be titled and written in a neutral point of view. It could be that the fork was a good idea, but was approached without balance, or that its creators mistakenly claimed
647:
process. Examples might be the cuisine of a particular region being forked from an article about the region in general, a filmography being forked from an article about a director, or a sub-genre being forked from its parent genre.
206:, even if one started off as an exact copy of another piece of content, the two pieces, being independently editable, may diverge over time, until they include different and possibly even conflicting facts about the topic.
315:, not to be taken literally. All content forks are redundant, that's their nature, even the acceptable ones, but we use the term "redundant content fork" to refer to the specific kind described in this section.
915:
Articles on distinct but related topics may well contain a significant amount of information in common with one another. This does not make either of the two articles a content fork. As an example, clearly
190:), often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or facts. All POV forks are undesirable on Knowledge (XXG), as they avoid consensus building, which violates one of our most important policies.
413:
If possible, refrain from using "criticism" and instead use neutral terms such as "perception" or "reception"; if the word "criticism" must be used, make sure that such criticism considers both the merits
123:
is a piece of content (such as an inter-wiki object, a page, or a page section) that has the same scope as another piece of content that predated it, essentially covering the same topic. A content fork is
172:
is preferable in most circumstances. Therefore, it is important for an editor to check, before creating a new article on a particular subject, that there isn't already an article covering that subject.
848:
Different articles can be legitimately created on subjects which themselves represent points of view, as long as the title clearly indicates what its subject is, the point-of-view subject is presented
876:, etc., all represent legitimate article subjects. As noted above, "Criticism of" type articles should generally start as sections of the main article and be spun off by agreement among the editors.
766:
automatically make the new article a forbidden POV fork. When done properly, the resulting articles are not POV forks, and both the original and the spinoff article will comply with the
543:
929:
762:
Summary sections are used in a broader article to briefly cover the content of more detailed subarticles. Even if the subject of the new article is controversial, this does
1054:
967:
266:(XXG) displayed them all. That would defeat the collaborative purpose of the wiki, and it would make managing information on dogs 100 times more difficult.
1182:
807:
1177:
42:
910:
400:
The creator of the new article may be sincerely convinced that there is so much information about a certain aspect of a subject that it justifies
1046:
1050:
717:
397:, that fact does not justify creating an article named "Unanswered questions about heavier-than-air flight" to expound upon the rejected idea.
721:
713:
985:
vision for a proposed change is – without the controversy of having that new proposed version automatically replace the existing version.
508:, this is perfectly acceptable. Project-level forks are not bound in any way by Knowledge (XXG)'s community policies or customs, like the
1087:
937:
694:
1012:
767:
366:
354:
168:". Content fork articles created unintentionally result in redundant or conflicting articles and are to be avoided, as the goal of a
683:
1151:
1093:
394:
1114:
643:
Sometimes editors "spin off" part of an existing article to create an article focused on a sub-topic. This is done through the
1098:
58:
698:
1008:
484:
50:
232:
While most types of content forks are acceptable, it is especially important to watch out for the unacceptable kinds...
1075:
811:
203:
1124:
917:
385:
synonym of an existing article's title. For example, if an editor has tried to include in an existing article about
357:: all facts and major points of view on a certain subject should be treated in one article. As Knowledge (XXG) does
741:
673:
417:
faults, and is not entirely negative (consider what would happen if a "Praise of..." article was created instead).
782:
1033:
It is worthwhile to put (usually considerable) maintenance efforts in two pages that roughly cover the same topic
669:
774:
702:
659:
560:
513:
490:
924:; this does not make it a fork. Another example is where two articles cover the same topic, but are clearly
297:
fail to find an existing article, or simply flesh out a derivative article rather than the main article on a
795:
390:
1037:
1071:
873:
169:
1119:
1109:
1103:
996:
990:
778:
651:
The main situation where spinoff articles become necessary is when the expansion of a section creates an
644:
137:
361:
view article forking as an acceptable solution to disagreements between contributors, such forks may be
1024:
979:
885:
831:
619:
579:
are all about the same subject, yet they are acceptable content forks of each other and of the article
525:
466:
426:
324:
285:
241:
215:
67:
54:
453:
Note, that meeting one of the descriptions listed below does not preclude something from also being a
158:
are acceptable, they should not contradict each other—contradictions should be corrected or removed.
1090:– related advice about Knowledge (XXG)-internal content forks, including discussions and policy pages
1066:
952:
921:
725:
637:
401:
362:
869:
564:
277:
An article about domestic house cats would be an unacceptable content fork of the existing article
144:
409:
933:
590:
572:
109:, in which articles are split up so that one can advocate a different stance on the subject, and
652:
404:
a separate article. Any subarticle that deals with opinions about the subject of parent article
302:
298:
187:
586:
133:
849:
374:
183:
568:
556:
289:
378:
350:
706:
663:
602:
509:
1129:
308:
Redundant content forks of page types other than articles are rarer, but they do occur.
288:
of the People's
Republic of China would be an unacceptable content fork of the existing
852:, and each article cross-references articles on other appropriate points of view. Thus
598:
576:
17:
505:
1171:
1156:
756:
677:
594:
943:
Further, in encyclopedias it is perfectly proper to have separate articles for each
1161:
687:
1138:
857:
732:
The result is often an overview article written largely in summary style, e.g.:
552:
Here are some examples of pages of different types that cover the same subject:
496:
place. As long as the new project adheres to their legal obligations under the
136:
are not content forks, because they do not diverge from the originals (usually
1133:
1016:
861:
799:
132:
depending on its type. Content forking is the act of creating a content fork.
865:
853:
751:
497:
386:
1106:(essay on the way criticism can be included in Knowledge (XXG) articles)
393:
is impossible, but the consensus of editors has rejected the attempt as
746:
580:
273:
Here are some examples of pages of the same type on the same subject:
1030:
There is a true advantage to presenting the list as a sortable table
614:
Article spinoffs: "Summary style" meta-articles and summary sections
450:
Except for the types presented above, content forks are acceptable.
353:. This second article is known as a "POV fork" of the first, and is
146:
summary-style spin-offs or new, linked articles for related material
928:. In such cases, one of the articles will be prefixed by the text
606:
312:
153:
736:
501:
110:
605:
are acceptable content forks of each other and of the article
278:
87:
29:
544:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories, lists, and navigation templates
920:
will contain a significant amount of information also in
53:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
129:
1164:
to find duplicated content on two
Knowledge (XXG) pages
900:
893:
839:
815:
803:
627:
533:
512:. Project-level forking is discussed in more detail at
474:
441:
434:
339:
332:
256:
249:
223:
75:
125:
102:
968:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary
504:in exchange for use of this content, as set out at
143:As articles grow, editors are encouraged to create
182:is a content fork deliberately created to avoid a
149:, to make articles clearer and easier to manage.
1047:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions (music)#Lists
583:, because they are all different types of pages.
292:(which is about the People's Republic of China).
1055:List of compositions by Franz Schubert by genre
826:Articles whose subject is a point of view (POV)
41:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
1146:Tools for automatic detection of content forks
911:Knowledge (XXG):Copying within Knowledge (XXG)
155:different page types covering the same subject
1157:Duplicate content report for en.wikipedia.org
8:
520:Pages of different types on the same subject
163:
693:Multiple television-related media like the
49:Editors should generally follow it, though
236:Pages of the same type on the same subject
113:(also known as "redundant content forks").
111:pages of the same type on the same subject
808:Development of Uncharted 4: A Thief's End
311:Note that "redundant content fork" is an
712:Multiple related tragic events like the
1088:Knowledge (XXG):Content forks/Internal
1051:List of compositions by Franz Schubert
655:problem for the article, for example:
1183:Knowledge (XXG) neutral point of view
768:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
281:(which is about domestic house cats).
7:
1094:Knowledge (XXG):Avoiding POV funnels
198:The reason they are called "content
1115:Knowledge (XXG):Tendentious editing
210:Unacceptable types of content forks
1178:Knowledge (XXG) content guidelines
1099:Knowledge (XXG):Be neutral in form
938:Introduction to general relativity
506:Knowledge (XXG)'s copyright policy
57:. When in doubt, discuss first on
25:
1023:There is no other way to avoid a
684:Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal
485:Knowledge (XXG):Mirrors and forks
421:Acceptable types of content forks
105:. The two types that are not are
27:Knowledge (XXG) content guideline
951:; unlike dictionaries, a single
101:Most types of content forks are
91:
33:
926:directed at different audiences
1125:Knowledge (XXG):Semi-duplicate
454:
178:
106:
1:
1040:issue for either of the pages
783:Knowledge (XXG):Summary style
152:While content forks that are
1053:(sortable table format) and
785:for procedural information.
775:Knowledge (XXG):Article size
1076:Template:Move portions from
514:Knowledge (XXG):Forking FAQ
491:Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Forking
461:Project-level content forks
1199:
977:
908:
883:
829:
812:Uncharted 4: A Thief's End
742:The Last of Us (franchise)
674:O. J. Simpson robbery case
635:
617:
541:
523:
488:
482:
464:
424:
322:
239:
213:
65:
59:this guideline's talk page
1120:Knowledge (XXG):Integrate
1110:Knowledge (XXG):Splitting
1104:Knowledge (XXG):Criticism
779:Knowledge (XXG):Splitting
670:O. J. Simpson murder case
645:Knowledge (XXG):Splitting
319:Point of view (POV) forks
980:Knowledge (XXG):Subpages
918:Joséphine de Beauharnais
660:Death of Michael Jackson
636:Not to be confused with
561:Template:Geology sidebar
355:inconsistent with policy
179:point of view (POV) fork
99:This page in a nutshell:
1152:WP:Duplication detector
796:Mel Gibson DUI incident
724:were spun off from the
391:heavier-than-air flight
305:into the main article.
18:Knowledge (XXG):SPINOFF
1072:Template:Move portions
874:Criticism of the Bible
170:single source of truth
165:redundant content fork
1015:or without using the
930:"Introduction to ..."
810:was folded back into
798:was folded back into
542:Further information:
489:Further information:
375:neutral point of view
184:neutral point of view
1162:Similar page checker
1067:Template:Duplication
1011:can be formatted as
953:encyclopedia article
922:Napoleon I of France
726:September 11 attacks
1141:(original proposal)
1057:(structured list).
870:Biblical literalism
705:were spun off from
676:were spun off from
565:Glossary of geology
365:, or nominated for
1139:MeatBall:ViewPoint
974:Temporary subpages
934:General relativity
686:was spun off from
662:was spun off from
591:Template:Shark nav
573:Outline of geology
202:" is that, like a
1130:m:Content forking
1009:Stand-alone lists
587:Outline of sharks
408:include suitably-
395:complete nonsense
117:
116:
86:
85:
43:content guideline
16:(Redirected from
1190:
947:definition of a
903:
896:
880:Related articles
842:
630:
569:Category:Geology
557:Template:Geology
536:
477:
444:
437:
342:
335:
290:Outline of China
259:
252:
250:WP:REDUNDANTFORK
226:
95:
94:
88:
78:
37:
36:
30:
21:
1198:
1197:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1168:
1167:
1148:
1084:
1063:
1006:
982:
976:
913:
907:
906:
899:
892:
888:
882:
846:
845:
838:
834:
828:
791:
707:Game of Thrones
664:Michael Jackson
641:
634:
633:
626:
622:
616:
603:Category:Sharks
546:
540:
539:
532:
528:
522:
493:
487:
481:
480:
473:
469:
463:
448:
447:
440:
433:
429:
423:
346:
345:
338:
331:
327:
321:
263:
262:
257:WP:SAMETYPEFORK
255:
248:
244:
238:
230:
229:
222:
218:
212:
196:
92:
82:
81:
74:
70:
62:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1196:
1194:
1186:
1185:
1180:
1170:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1159:
1154:
1147:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1136:
1127:
1122:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1101:
1096:
1091:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1069:
1062:
1059:
1042:
1041:
1034:
1031:
1028:
1005:
1002:
997:main namespace
975:
972:
932:, for example
905:
904:
897:
889:
884:
881:
878:
844:
843:
835:
830:
827:
824:
790:
787:
765:
760:
759:
754:
749:
744:
739:
730:
729:
710:
699:title sequence
691:
681:
667:
632:
631:
623:
618:
615:
612:
611:
610:
599:List of sharks
584:
577:Portal:Geology
538:
537:
529:
524:
521:
518:
479:
478:
470:
465:
462:
459:
446:
445:
438:
430:
425:
422:
419:
389:a theory that
344:
343:
336:
328:
323:
320:
317:
294:
293:
282:
261:
260:
253:
245:
240:
237:
234:
228:
227:
219:
214:
211:
208:
195:
192:
115:
114:
96:
84:
83:
80:
79:
71:
66:
63:
48:
47:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1195:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1176:
1175:
1173:
1163:
1160:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1150:
1149:
1145:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1116:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1070:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1058:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1039:
1035:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1003:
1001:
999:
998:
992:
986:
981:
973:
971:
969:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
941:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
912:
902:
898:
895:
891:
890:
887:
879:
877:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
841:
837:
836:
833:
825:
823:
819:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
788:
786:
784:
780:
776:
771:
769:
763:
758:
757:United States
755:
753:
750:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
734:
733:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
689:
685:
682:
679:
678:O. J. Simpson
675:
671:
668:
665:
661:
658:
657:
656:
654:
649:
646:
639:
629:
625:
624:
621:
613:
608:
604:
600:
596:
595:Portal:Sharks
592:
588:
585:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
555:
554:
553:
550:
545:
535:
531:
530:
527:
519:
517:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
492:
486:
476:
472:
471:
468:
460:
458:
456:
451:
443:
439:
436:
432:
431:
428:
420:
418:
416:
411:
407:
403:
398:
396:
392:
388:
382:
380:
376:
370:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:point of view
341:
337:
334:
330:
329:
326:
318:
316:
314:
309:
306:
304:
300:
291:
287:
283:
280:
276:
275:
274:
271:
267:
258:
254:
251:
247:
246:
243:
235:
233:
225:
221:
220:
217:
209:
207:
205:
204:software fork
201:
193:
191:
189:
185:
181:
180:
174:
171:
167:
166:
159:
157:
156:
150:
148:
147:
141:
139:
135:
134:Transclusions
131:
127:
122:
112:
108:
104:
100:
97:
90:
89:
77:
73:
72:
69:
64:
60:
56:
52:
46:
44:
39:
32:
31:
19:
1134:m:Separatism
1043:
1036:There is no
1017:table syntax
1007:
1004:List formats
994:
987:
983:
964:
960:
956:
948:
944:
942:
925:
914:
847:
820:
792:
772:
761:
731:
688:Jimmy Savile
653:undue weight
650:
642:
551:
547:
510:five pillars
494:
452:
449:
414:
405:
402:spinning off
399:
383:
371:
358:
347:
310:
307:
295:
272:
268:
264:
231:
199:
197:
188:undue weight
177:
175:
164:
160:
154:
151:
145:
142:
130:unacceptable
121:content fork
120:
118:
98:
40:
1025:WP:PAGESIZE
995:not in the
978:Main page:
858:Creationism
483:Main page:
475:WP:PROJFORK
442:WP:GOODFORK
340:WP:POVSPLIT
186:(including
1172:Categories
1038:notability
909:See also:
862:Capitalism
800:Mel Gibson
720:, and the
718:casualties
701:, and the
695:characters
638:WP:SPINOUT
628:WP:SPINOFF
534:WP:DIFFORK
333:WP:POVFORK
224:WP:BADFORK
126:acceptable
103:acceptable
51:exceptions
991:namespace
955:covers a
945:different
901:WP:RELART
886:Shortcuts
866:Communism
854:Evolution
850:neutrally
840:WP:SUBPOV
752:Uncharted
722:aftermath
435:WP:OKFORK
427:Shortcuts
381:over it.
379:ownership
325:Shortcuts
242:Shortcuts
194:Etymology
138:templates
107:POV forks
55:consensus
1082:See also
959:, not a
894:WP:RELAR
832:Shortcut
770:policy.
714:timeline
620:Shortcut
526:Shortcut
498:CC BY-SA
467:Shortcut
455:POV fork
410:weighted
387:aviation
367:deletion
216:Shortcut
76:WP:CFORK
68:Shortcut
1027:problem
816:section
806:), and
804:section
789:Caution
747:Physics
581:Geology
286:outline
1013:tables
781:, and
716:, the
697:, the
601:, and
363:merged
303:merged
957:topic
703:music
607:Shark
313:idiom
299:topic
200:forks
1132:and
1074:and
1061:Tags
993:and
961:term
949:term
936:and
872:and
864:and
856:and
773:See
737:Film
672:and
575:and
502:GFDL
406:must
1049:):
965:cf.
963:. (
818:).
764:not
500:or
415:and
359:not
284:An
279:Cat
140:).
128:or
1174::
970:)
940:.
868:,
860:,
777:,
597:,
593:,
589:,
571:,
567:,
563:,
559:,
516:.
457:.
369:.
176:A
119:A
814:(
802:(
728:.
709:.
690:.
680:.
666:.
640:.
609:.
162:"
61:.
45:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.