24:
88:
155:
can be presumed until disagreement becomes evident. That is typically through reverting, editing, or stating disagreement on a relevant talk page. You find out whether your edit has consensus when it sticks, is built upon by others, and most importantly when it is used or referred to by others.
363:, a lack of response to an edit does not necessarily imply community consent. Knowledge (XXG) is huge and our editors' time is limited. At any given time, there are many open discussions on many different topics across the project. We encourage our editors to
367:
and it is highly likely that you will eventually find yourself affected by the outcome of some decision that you didn't know about, or didn't have the chance to join. Where a decision is based mostly on silence, it is especially important to remember that
193:
Of course, it is impractical to wait forever for affirmation: in the meantime then, sometimes it is best to assume that silence implies consensus. Lacking any objections on talk pages, you can continue to hold that hopefully safe assumption until
253:
When two editors reach an impasse, one or both may think that repeating and reiterating the same arguments is the only alternative to consent by silence. This is not the case. Either editor may withdraw from the discussion by stating that:
381:
386:
Apply the rule of silence and consensus only when a weak consensus would suffice. Silence and consensus does not apply when a mandatory discussion is required. When real people are affected by a decision, such as
190:. No matter how many people on a talk page say they support an edit, sometimes it is only when your changes are reverted or substantially changed that you learn that you did not, in fact, have full consensus.
184:
In wiki-editing, it is difficult to get positive affirmation for your edits. Disapproval comes with a further edit, a statement of disapproval on the page's talk page or your talk page, or at times a
159:
Most of the time, you will find that it's fine to assume consensus, even if just for now, as it's more important to keep editing and cooperating smoothly in
540:
395:, positive confirmation is preferred. Even in these cases, however, dissent might show up later, and it is then no longer appropriate to assume consensus.
535:
456:
265:
198:
by editing or reverting. The more visible the statement, and the longer it stands unchallenged, the stronger the implication of consensus is.
329:
The post is correct, well-written information that needs no follow-up commentary. There's nothing more to say except "Yeah, what they said."
45:
245:
369:
451:
32:
438:
294:
105:
332:
The post is complete and utter nonsense, and no one wants to waste the energy or bandwidth to even point this out.
468:
44:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
409:
497:
421:
286:
49:
36:
306:
207:
59:
433:
364:
356:
Consensus arising from silence evaporates when an editor changes existing content or objects to it.
235:". If therefore you wish to construe what my silence betokened, you must construe that I consented.
186:
360:
388:
179:
520:
290:
392:
195:
160:
272:
If an editor withdraws without comment the other editor should, before assuming consent,
529:
348:
276:
282:
the silent editor and alert them that their silence will be construed as agreement.
152:
338:
No one understood the post, but won't ask for clarification, for whatever reason.
240:
493:
473:
325:
The problem with no response is that there are five possible interpretations:
382:
Knowledge (XXG):Silence does not imply consent when drafting new policies
147:
consensus exists because you have seen evidence of disagreement.
96:
Consensus is assumed when there's no evidence of disagreement.
82:
18:
264:
The other editor is free to pursue the options offered at
80:
Explanatory essay about the
Knowledge (XXG):Consensus page
314:
215:
67:
341:No one cares about the post, for whatever reason.
323:
223:
101:
441:– relating to articles, media, and other pages
422:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus § Level of consensus
168:if you disagree, the onus is on you to say so
8:
439:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion process § No quorum
457:Knowledge (XXG):BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
226:
103:
335:No one read the post, for whatever reason.
301:Silence is the weakest form of consensus
196:someone comes along and changes the page
46:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
485:
132:Nobody ever complained about my idea →
541:Knowledge (XXG) essays about consensus
351:-- Original description of the dilemma
258:The discussion has reached an impasse,
7:
393:biographies of living persons policy
112:He who is silent is taken to agree.
391:, or using material covered by the
359:This so because, as illustrated by
141:Someone complained about my idea →
536:Knowledge (XXG) supplemental pages
452:Knowledge (XXG):What is consensus?
349:Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
134:You can assume there is consensus
50:thoroughly vetted by the community
14:
297:without first seeking consensus.
202:What does not constitute silence
86:
22:
266:WP:Dispute resolution requests
261:They will not continue it, and
1:
410:Meta:Don't vote on everything
231:": the maxim of the law is "
106:Qui tacet consentire videtur
559:
379:
304:
285:That said, in the face of
205:
177:
57:
469:Consensus decision-making
37:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus
521:meatball:SilentAgreement
293:a good faith editor may
136:until you hear otherwise
94:This page in a nutshell:
498:Internet Movie Database
494:"A Man For All Seasons"
434:Knowledge (XXG):Be bold
344:
251:
227:
120:
104:
16:Wikimedia project page
246:A Man for All Seasons
233:Silence gives consent
163:as much as possible.
376:Scope of application
370:consensus can change
166:A corollary is that
228:Qui tacet consentit
125:Is there consensus?
48:as it has not been
428:Related guidelines
347:Bryan C. Warnock.
143:You can no longer
404:Essays on silence
361:Warnock's dilemma
180:Silence procedure
100:
99:
78:
77:
33:explanatory essay
548:
508:
507:
505:
504:
490:
416:Related policies
352:
317:
281:
275:
249:
230:
218:
118:
109:
90:
89:
83:
70:
26:
25:
19:
558:
557:
551:
550:
549:
547:
546:
545:
526:
525:
517:
512:
511:
502:
500:
492:
491:
487:
482:
401:
384:
378:
354:
346:
321:
320:
313:
309:
303:
279:
273:
250:
239:
222:
221:
214:
210:
204:
182:
176:
150:
126:
119:
116:
87:
81:
74:
73:
66:
62:
54:
53:
23:
17:
12:
11:
5:
556:
555:
552:
544:
543:
538:
528:
527:
524:
523:
516:
515:External links
513:
510:
509:
484:
483:
481:
478:
477:
476:
471:
460:
459:
454:
446:Related essays
443:
442:
436:
425:
424:
413:
412:
400:
397:
389:blocking users
377:
374:
343:
342:
339:
336:
333:
330:
322:
319:
318:
315:WP:WEAKSILENCE
310:
305:
302:
299:
295:employ silence
270:
269:
262:
259:
237:
225:The maxim is "
220:
219:
211:
206:
203:
200:
175:
172:
149:
148:
142:
139:
133:
129:
124:
121:
114:
98:
97:
91:
79:
76:
75:
72:
71:
63:
58:
55:
43:
42:
29:
27:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
554:
553:
542:
539:
537:
534:
533:
531:
522:
519:
518:
514:
499:
495:
489:
486:
479:
475:
472:
470:
467:
466:
465:
464:
458:
455:
453:
450:
449:
448:
447:
440:
437:
435:
432:
431:
430:
429:
423:
420:
419:
418:
417:
411:
408:
407:
406:
405:
398:
396:
394:
390:
383:
375:
373:
371:
366:
362:
357:
353:
350:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
327:
326:
316:
312:
311:
308:
300:
298:
296:
292:
288:
283:
278:
267:
263:
260:
257:
256:
255:
248:
247:
242:
236:
234:
229:
217:
216:WP:NOTSILENCE
213:
212:
209:
201:
199:
197:
191:
189:
188:
181:
173:
171:
169:
164:
162:
157:
154:
146:
140:
137:
131:
130:
128:
127:
117:Latin proverb
113:
110:
108:
107:
95:
92:
85:
84:
69:
65:
64:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
34:
28:
21:
20:
501:. Retrieved
488:
462:
461:
445:
444:
427:
426:
415:
414:
403:
402:
385:
358:
355:
345:
324:
284:
271:
252:
244:
232:
224:
192:
185:
183:
167:
165:
158:
151:
144:
135:
123:
122:
111:
102:
93:
30:
241:Thomas More
31:This is an
530:Categories
503:2009-05-31
480:References
474:Groupthink
380:See also:
178:See also:
161:good faith
68:WP:SILENCE
35:about the
174:Rationale
153:Consensus
463:Articles
399:See also
307:Shortcut
208:Shortcut
60:Shortcut
365:be bold
287:vandals
291:trolls
187:revert
145:assume
289:and
277:ping
39:page
243:in
532::
496:.
372:.
280:}}
274:{{
238:—
170:.
115:—
41:.
506:.
268:.
138:.
52:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.