241:? Yes, it does, and such a discussion will probably be closed very fast. But what happens afterwards? Sadly, in many cases this is it: The "keep"-voters feel that it's the nominator's concern to add those sources to the article. The nominator, on the other hand, thinks that those who presented the sources should and will add them and improve the article. The closing admin assumes that they just had to assess the situation and closes the discussion without making any changes at all. So what happens? The AfD template is removed, the AfD is closed... but the article is left in its sorry state, unsourced and probably still tagged for it.
106:
35:
91:
264:. Every user participating in such a discussion, especially the nominator, the closing admin and the one(s) providing sources, should feel responsible to fix the article once the discussion has closed with a keep-result. Do not hope that
248:. When an article is closed as "merge", it will be tagged as such. But oftentimes no-one feels responsible for doing the merging. So the closing admin will not perform the merge, nor will the users
128:
If this happens, it does harm to the encyclopedia we are trying to build without anyone actually wanting it. People just assume that someone else will do what they realize has to be done.
287:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
51:
282:
265:
302:
120:
17:
277:
55:
99:
Do not assume that someone else will fix a problem. If you see a problem and know how to fix it, do it!
65:
222:
210:
198:
175:
163:
43:
238:
151:
225:
213:
201:
178:
166:
245:
114:
147:
143:
296:
252:
for it, and when it's over, the article sits unmerged for days, weeks, maybe months.
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
105:
113:
When a solution has been presented in a discussion, most notably at
85:
29:
260:
It is simple: It is not somebody else's problem: it is
73:
288:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is a volunteer service
195:
193:
191:
189:
187:
268:will do it...if you have time, do it yourself!
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Somebody Else's Problem
136:Imagine the following deletion discussion:
104:
52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
244:This also applies to other problems at
7:
174:. There are plenty of sources! -–
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
146:as non-notable and there are no
89:
33:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
1:
154:02:03, 2 February 2002 (UTC)
150:to demonstrate otherwise.
319:
283:User:Somebody "Notme" Else
226:01:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
186:. Yeah, sources are here:
63:
278:Knowledge (XXG):So fix it
214:03:03, 3 March 2003 (UTC)
202:03:03, 3 March 2003 (UTC)
179:03:03, 3 March 2003 (UTC)
167:03:03, 3 March 2003 (UTC)
97:This page in a nutshell:
121:Somebody Else's Problem
109:This poster says it all
303:Knowledge (XXG) essays
162:. Clearly notable. --
110:
108:
54:, as it has not been
246:deletion discussions
115:deletion discussions
237:Looks like a clear
209:per GoogleUser. -–
111:
103:
102:
84:
83:
16:(Redirected from
310:
148:reliable sources
93:
92:
86:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
318:
317:
313:
312:
311:
309:
308:
307:
293:
292:
274:
258:
134:
90:
80:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
316:
314:
306:
305:
295:
294:
291:
290:
285:
280:
273:
270:
257:
254:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
221:per above. -–
216:
204:
181:
169:
142:Subject fails
133:
130:
101:
100:
94:
82:
81:
78:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
315:
304:
301:
300:
298:
289:
286:
284:
281:
279:
276:
275:
271:
269:
267:
263:
255:
253:
251:
247:
242:
240:
227:
224:
220:
217:
215:
212:
208:
205:
203:
200:
196:
194:
192:
190:
188:
185:
182:
180:
177:
173:
170:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:
156:
155:
153:
149:
145:
141:
140:
139:
138:
137:
131:
129:
126:
124:
122:
116:
107:
98:
95:
88:
87:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
266:someone else
261:
259:
249:
243:
236:
218:
206:
183:
171:
159:
135:
127:
118:
112:
96:
41:
125:may occur.
42:This is an
256:What to do
199:GoogleUser
132:The effect
239:SNOW keep
176:SourceFan
152:Nominator
297:Category
272:See also
123:"-effect
66:Shortcut
250:voting
211:FanBoy
164:Keeper
117:, the
74:WP:SEP
223:Keepy
197:. -–
44:essay
262:ours
219:Keep
207:Keep
184:Keep
172:Keep
160:Keep
144:WP:N
299::
119:"
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
