783:
in the process or undoing his vandalism. Sounds awful suspicions since I KNOW that you weren't wikihounding him or wikistalking him after I'd warned you so many times before about it. At any rate, you're protestith...ing a bit too much as, if you didn't engage in sock puppet abuse, this investigation will end with no finding and you can walk away. If you've got some crystal ball as to why I reported you... in other words if you're reading my mind... please disclose the method by which you are doing this. It's okay for you to hound me, Koalorka, and DanMP5, however when your hounding leads to legitemate suspicion that you are engaging in sock puppet abuse, you protest? Hmmmm. You pick and choose the WP guideline that you're going to acuse others of violating while you violate others on the side? --
857:, against people who edit gun articles isn't real? Your hounding three separate editors (Myself, Koalorka and DanMP5) even going so far as to question DanMP5's pick for a handle... Well all of that is okay. But, if I call you out on it I'm suddenly making a personal attack? Yeah, I'll let that one stand on its own. Please, describe in detail how I called somebody a "Retard". Please. Or do you think you can toss these things out and expect people to believe them. Your style of editing is confrontational combining quibbling and nit-picking with vendetta rides where you try your best to ruin whoever disagrees with you. That's an observation. I've read your edit history. --
977:
someone who isn't a professional photographer. In a number of other cases, Dominick has changed images in articles, but the new image (which he claims as his own) is also of unusual quality, in some cases, being rather good sketches of animals, that are drawn in a style that is quite uncommon in modern sketches. In one case, he has added a picture of a ship, claiming the photo to be his own work, when the ship in question sank over a century ago!--
730:. Nobody ever acused me of being good at this. You're the expert. However, being the expert, you'd probably be quick to recognize all of the logical fallacies you've commited in our short interaction. That is, if you were acting in good faith instead of trying to punish Koalorka and I for disagreeing with you. I just assummed that you'd conjured up this Josh character to further punish firearms article editors. --
1047:
687:. Taking into account that you had no previous interaction with either of these users I may either conclude that you are stalking one or both of them or that your defense of Josh was a SUSPECTED act of sock puppet abuse. Will you agree that if you are not engaging in sock puppet abuse, you have nothing to worry about from this investigation? --
922:]. yes, it's so stalkerish to interact with someone on an article page for the first time, click their name, and 20 minutes later comment on their user page for the first time. nukes, you are just wasting everyone's time. the accused sock is obvious and you just threw my name in because you have animosity towards me. very poor judgment.
1017:
782:
I reported you here because it was odd, to me, that you jumped to the defense of this guy who was obvioiusly stealing content and posting it here even though you had NO INTEREST whatsoever in his edits or the articles that he edited beyond the fact that somebody whose edits you were nit-picking was
596:
User Josh
Woolstenhulme got banned and the short list of articles he'd been 'editing' immediately got edited with exactly the same things by the Dominick1283. User Dominick1283 immediately begins editing in exact same style, the same articles, and with an instant knowledge of how to edit pictures,
680:
Comma, you involved yourself in this well before you acused me of sock puppet abuse. To be clear, you went on
Kaolorka's talk page and jumped into a conversation though you had no vested interest in it other than, as I stated above, that you might be the same person engaging in sock puppet abuse.
976:
Looking at this, it would strain credulity if
Dominick isn't Josh. Looking at it, 11 of the 14 firearm articles Dominick has edited were also edited by Josh, and Dominick did so quite soon after the banning of Josh, and the actions have been identical, adding images of unusually high-quality for
960:
This is no doubt a sock of Josh
Woolstenhulme, he did not heed to the warnings and has taken nothing out of his ban, uploading the same copyrighted images. Either this user has a poor grasp of English, is mentally incapable of understanding copyright status or is intentionally uploading stolen
603:
Well, since I reverted it, I recall it was the same exact picture, uploaded a second time by the newbie. User
Theserialcomma is a low probability, but he was acting odd and defending Josh in a quite peculiar way by stalking another editor who was reverting Josh's additions.
701:
i only agree that your grandmaster detective work used to accuse me should be studied at the smithsonian and taught at harvard. either i'm a stalker or a sockpuppet. oh, the options! i am gonna go with neither, my electronic sherlock holmes.
873:
thanks for calling me out on making the claim that you've called people retards. i'm glad you didn't let me just 'toss it out and expect people to believe it'. here are the diffs, in case you are still skeptical of your own words: retard1
853:
So, you're not hounding me? Really? Did you read the Glock talk page? Did you read what you wrote on multiple reports, be it ANI, Reliable
Sources, or Sock Puppet investigations? So, your vendetta, stated by you here:
797:
speaking of logical fallacies, because i "protest too much," i must be guilty. sure. way to waste everyone's time because you have a grudge against me for reporting your gross incivility. way to go.
748:
policy. reporting you to admins and getting you blocked for incivility wasn't a logical fallacy or bad faith either. you went around calling people retards and morons and you got blocked for
21:
613:
1057:
811:
by the way, your non stop claims about me wikihounding you are lies and are to be construed as personal attacks, unless you can prove otherwise. i would report your
116:
57:
510:
413:
227:
109:
51:
815:
personal attacks, but i'm not sure which name to report. do i call you Nukes4Tots or Winged Brick? Which sock name do you prefer to be called by?
650:
test. it's obviously the same person. nukes deciding to involve me is just lame retribution for catching his own sockpuppetry with his accounts
179:
17:
317:
573:
503:
476:
290:
63:
406:
220:
155:
920:
visited his talk page, saw that he was being uncivil to a newbie (he called the accused sock a moron), and warned him for incivility
136:
69:
1082:
1032:
1002:
986:
970:
950:
931:
891:
866:
824:
806:
792:
765:
739:
711:
696:
667:
638:
549:
452:
348:
266:
530:
97:
45:
625:] and i get accused of being that person. awesome! can someone finish the checkuser on Nukes4Tots while they're at it:
433:
247:
305:
927:
887:
820:
802:
761:
707:
663:
634:
491:
394:
40:
32:
753:
626:
208:
744:...warning a koalorka for calling a newbie a moron is not a logical fallacy or bad faith; he violated
329:
862:
788:
735:
692:
588:
999:
923:
883:
816:
798:
757:
703:
659:
630:
1075:
966:
914:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AGlock_pistol&diff=268988495&oldid=268971678
908:
bad detective work or bad faith? this is where i actually first interacted with
Koalorka on the
1028:
946:
651:
812:
647:
597:
upload, etc. See edit histories of both. For example, here Josh adds a picture he uploaded:
749:
745:
858:
784:
756:
and then having you try to do the same to me but on false premises to me is just comedy.
731:
688:
655:
584:
996:
1069:
982:
962:
727:
937:
Checkusers have no interest in reading long arguments on SPI pages. You just wasted
1046:
1024:
942:
909:
335:
961:
material, for purposes unknown to me. I don't think TheSerialComma is involved.
367:
341:
92:
978:
300:
684:. Further, you went and posted a message on Josh's page with this dif:
486:
754:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nukes4Tots
627:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nukes4Tots
389:
203:
1023:. And don't argue on SPI pages. Really. We don't read any of it. --
992:
913:
855:
685:
682:
601:
598:
567:
560:
556:
543:
536:
523:
517:
497:
470:
463:
459:
446:
439:
426:
420:
400:
378:
374:
361:
354:
323:
311:
284:
277:
273:
260:
253:
240:
234:
214:
173:
166:
162:
149:
142:
129:
123:
103:
75:
995:. No opinion currently on the other users listed -
646:by the way, this joshwoolstenhulme sock passes the
1011:Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
8:
658:that always seem to agree with each other.
752:. reporting you for blatant sockpuppetry
623:ha! i defend a newbie against incivility
190:Report date February 14 2009, 02:27 (UTC)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations
941:of that time that you spent arguing. --
916:, 20 minutes before i mysteriously and
600:and here Dominick adds another picture:
7:
28:
614:Defending yourself against claims
1045:
1015:
608:Comments by accused parties
991:Dominick is clearly Josh - see
726:You might recognize this as a
1:
1083:12:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
1052:This case has been marked as
1033:04:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
1003:12:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
987:01:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
971:03:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
951:04:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
932:21:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
892:04:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
867:03:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
825:02:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
807:02:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
793:23:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
766:22:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
740:21:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
712:20:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
697:19:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
668:10:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
639:09:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
629:- it was filed 2 weeks ago.
1099:
956:Comments by other users
33:User:Josh Woolstenhulme
583:Evidence submitted by
196:Suspected sockpuppets
368:cross-wiki contribs
681:Here's that diff:
93:Josh Woolstenhulme
85:Josh Woolstenhulme
41:Josh Woolstenhulme
22:Josh Woolstenhulme
1081:
1064:
1063:
1031:
993:user creation log
949:
912:discussion page,
652:User:Winged Brick
619:
1090:
1080:
1078:
1067:
1049:
1042:
1041:
1027:
1019:
1018:
945:
618:
609:
578:
576:
539:
513:
511:deleted contribs
489:
481:
479:
442:
416:
414:deleted contribs
392:
384:
382:
357:
303:
295:
293:
256:
230:
228:deleted contribs
206:
184:
182:
145:
119:
117:deleted contribs
95:
79:
58:deleted contribs
1098:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1085:
1076:
1068:
1060:automatically.
1016:
656:User:Nukes4Tots
610:
552:
526:
506:
485:
484:
455:
429:
409:
388:
387:
370:
344:
301:146.115.229.114
299:
298:
269:
243:
223:
202:
201:
193:
191:
158:
132:
112:
91:
90:
87:
43:
37:
35:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1096:
1094:
1086:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1056:. It has been
1050:
1040:
1039:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
958:
957:
935:
934:
924:Theserialcomma
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
884:Theserialcomma
871:
870:
869:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
817:Theserialcomma
799:Theserialcomma
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
758:Theserialcomma
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
704:Theserialcomma
673:
672:
671:
670:
660:Theserialcomma
631:Theserialcomma
621:
620:
595:
593:
592:
580:
579:
487:Theserialcomma
482:
385:
296:
198:
197:
192:
189:
187:
186:
185:
86:
83:
82:
81:
80:
36:
31:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1095:
1084:
1079:
1073:
1072:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1010:
1009:
1004:
1001:
998:
994:
990:
989:
988:
984:
980:
975:
974:
973:
972:
968:
964:
955:
954:
953:
952:
948:
944:
940:
933:
929:
925:
921:
919:
915:
911:
907:
906:
893:
889:
885:
882:]. good day.
881:
879:
877:
875:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
809:
808:
804:
800:
796:
795:
794:
790:
786:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
747:
743:
742:
741:
737:
733:
729:
728:false dilemma
725:
724:
723:
722:
713:
709:
705:
700:
699:
698:
694:
690:
686:
683:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
617:
615:
607:
606:
605:
602:
599:
590:
586:
582:
581:
575:
572:
569:
566:
562:
558:
555:
551:
548:
545:
542:
538:
535:
532:
529:
525:
522:
519:
516:
512:
509:
505:
502:
499:
496:
493:
488:
483:
478:
475:
472:
469:
465:
461:
458:
454:
451:
448:
445:
441:
438:
435:
432:
428:
425:
422:
419:
415:
412:
408:
405:
402:
399:
396:
391:
386:
380:
376:
373:
369:
366:
363:
360:
356:
353:
350:
347:
343:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
302:
297:
292:
289:
286:
283:
279:
275:
272:
268:
265:
262:
259:
255:
252:
249:
246:
242:
239:
236:
233:
229:
226:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
205:
200:
199:
195:
194:
188:
181:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
138:
135:
131:
128:
125:
122:
118:
115:
111:
108:
105:
102:
99:
94:
89:
88:
84:
77:
74:
71:
68:
65:
62:
59:
56:
53:
50:
47:
42:
39:
38:
34:
30:
23:
19:
1070:
1053:
1020:
1014:
959:
938:
936:
918:stalkerishly
917:
910:Glock pistol
622:
611:
594:
570:
564:
553:
546:
540:
533:
527:
520:
514:
507:
500:
494:
473:
467:
456:
449:
443:
436:
430:
423:
417:
410:
403:
397:
390:Millscunnage
371:
364:
358:
351:
345:
338:
332:
326:
320:
314:
308:
287:
281:
270:
263:
257:
250:
244:
237:
231:
224:
217:
211:
204:Dominick1283
176:
170:
159:
152:
146:
139:
133:
126:
120:
113:
106:
100:
72:
66:
60:
54:
48:
1038:Conclusions
880:], retard4
878:], retard3
876:], retard2
568:investigate
471:investigate
342:proxy check
285:investigate
174:investigate
859:Nukes4Tots
785:Nukes4Tots
732:Nukes4Tots
689:Nukes4Tots
585:Nukes4Tots
531:block user
524:filter log
434:block user
427:filter log
349:block user
324:filter log
248:block user
241:filter log
137:block user
130:filter log
70:block user
64:page moves
997:Peripitus
557:CheckUser
544:block log
537:spi block
460:CheckUser
447:block log
440:spi block
375:CheckUser
362:block log
355:spi block
274:CheckUser
261:block log
254:spi block
163:CheckUser
150:block log
143:spi block
76:block log
1071:Kanonkas
1058:archived
1021:Rejected
963:Koalorka
504:contribs
407:contribs
318:contribs
221:contribs
110:contribs
52:contribs
20: |
1025:Deskana
943:Deskana
813:WP:lame
648:WP:duck
1054:closed
1029:(talk)
1000:(Talk)
947:(talk)
750:WP:NPA
746:WP:NPA
574:cuwiki
477:cuwiki
291:cuwiki
180:cuwiki
1077:Talk
330:WHOIS
16:<
983:talk
967:talk
928:talk
888:talk
863:talk
821:talk
803:talk
789:talk
762:talk
736:talk
708:talk
693:talk
664:talk
654:and
635:talk
612:See
589:talk
518:logs
492:talk
421:logs
395:talk
336:RBLs
306:talk
235:logs
209:talk
124:logs
98:talk
46:talk
979:LWF
939:all
561:log
498:tag
464:log
401:tag
379:log
312:tag
278:log
215:tag
167:log
104:tag
1074::
1066:--
985:)
969:)
930:)
890:)
865:)
823:)
805:)
791:)
764:)
738:)
710:)
695:)
666:)
637:)
563:)
550:CA
466:)
453:CA
280:)
267:CA
169:)
156:CA
981:(
965:(
926:(
886:(
861:(
819:(
801:(
787:(
760:(
734:(
706:(
691:(
662:(
633:(
616:.
591:)
587:(
577:)
571:·
565:·
559:(
554:·
547:·
541:·
534:·
528:·
521:·
515:·
508:·
501:·
495:·
490:(
480:)
474:·
468:·
462:(
457:·
450:·
444:·
437:·
431:·
424:·
418:·
411:·
404:·
398:·
393:(
383:)
381:)
377:(
372:·
365:·
359:·
352:·
346:·
339:·
333:·
327:·
321:·
315:·
309:·
304:(
294:)
288:·
282:·
276:(
271:·
264:·
258:·
251:·
245:·
238:·
232:·
225:·
218:·
212:·
207:(
183:)
177:·
171:·
165:(
160:·
153:·
147:·
140:·
134:·
127:·
121:·
114:·
107:·
101:·
96:(
78:)
73:·
67:·
61:·
55:·
49:·
44:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.