306:
is also a sock, but because this account has not contributed as much to this page, I don't have sufficient evidence. For the other two however: To have two SPAs participate on the same article that also shows very strong signs of COI and paid editing, for both to support each other so completely, to
319:
of the page was written by a disinterested volunteer and not a covert paid editor breaching the Terms of Use. I expect whatever paid editing firm is most likely involved, they are going to be sophisticated enough to make a check-user in-effective.
284:, when he says the article-subject was "a technology leader in three different industries". Both accounts have a calm even tone and an air that suggests experience, though whatever experience they have is not documented in that account's history.
290:
Paul directly solicits
Intchar* to incorporate a primary source. He also advocates against the inclusion of cost-cutting and out-sourcing in the Lead, whereas Intchar* previously removed this sourced content from the
294:
though this removal of sourced content was not explained in the edit-summary and buried in other changes. Both are pushing for content about his thought-leadership on the commoditization/consumerization of
272:. Especially because two of them: Pauloperry and Intchar* are SPAs that have a similar tone, tend to back each other and tend to support edits that are common among COI editors. The
362:
21:
330:
of the article. I'm mostly just keeping an eye on it for anything crazy. I am relatively new to SPI, so please let me know if I need to provide anything else.
276:
article written by
Intchar* contained content like "positioned Verizon and the U.S. at the forefront of consumer Internet." ("positioned" is common PR lingo).
307:
use similar language that suggests a marketing background, to be away from the keyboard for a week, then both comment/edit within a few hours of each other
312:. For there to be so much support of common COI edits like including every press article where he is quoted. This is way too much to be a coincidence.
65:
280:
he uses similar language with "strategic importance" ("strategic" is again one of those common PR words). Paul also uses common PR-type language
176:
17:
239:
128:
58:
268:
I was surprised to find at last three accounts that have an interest in a page about a marginally notable business executive,
169:
304:
398:
347:
104:
215:
85:
393:
300:, even though the only sources available are mining press articles where he is quoted commenting about it.
196:
343:
335:
46:
388:
157:
269:
303:
It is likely that
MonsterMike99, who has been brought to SPI before and had his socks blocked
339:
331:
252:
361:
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
327:
262:
41:
152:
382:
316:
310:
308:
298:
296:
292:
287:
281:
277:
273:
233:
226:
222:
209:
202:
189:
183:
163:
122:
115:
111:
98:
91:
78:
72:
52:
381:
72 hours for the master and indeffing sock with tag.
375:Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
8:
7:
18:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations
385:is particularly telling. Closing.
28:
363:Defending yourself against claims
326:Please note, I have a COI with
315:I find it hard to imagine that
1:
338:) 19:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
416:
399:14:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
348:19:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
263:Editor interaction utility
257:Auto-generated every hour.
354:Comments by other users
145:Suspected sockpuppets
253:User compare report
367:
270:Shaygan Kheradpir
259:
407:
396:
391:
376:
359:
355:
255:
244:
242:
205:
179:
177:deleted contribs
155:
133:
131:
94:
68:
66:deleted contribs
44:
415:
414:
410:
409:
408:
406:
405:
404:
394:
389:
378:
374:
357:
353:
218:
192:
172:
151:
150:
142:
140:
107:
81:
61:
40:
39:
36:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
413:
411:
403:
402:
401:
386:
377:
372:
370:
356:
351:
266:
265:
260:
248:
246:
245:
147:
146:
141:
138:
136:
135:
134:
35:
32:
30:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
412:
400:
397:
392:
390:Berean Hunter
384:
380:
379:
373:
371:
368:
366:
364:
352:
350:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
313:
311:
309:
305:
301:
299:
297:
293:
289:
285:
283:
279:
275:
271:
264:
261:
258:
254:
251:
250:
249:
241:
238:
235:
232:
228:
224:
221:
217:
214:
211:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
191:
188:
185:
182:
178:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
154:
149:
148:
144:
143:
139:12 April 2015
137:
130:
127:
124:
121:
117:
113:
110:
106:
103:
100:
97:
93:
90:
87:
84:
80:
77:
74:
71:
67:
64:
60:
57:
54:
51:
48:
43:
38:
37:
33:
31:
23:
19:
369:
360:
358:
328:this section
323:
322:
317:this version
314:
302:
286:
267:
256:
247:
236:
230:
219:
212:
206:
199:
193:
186:
180:
173:
166:
160:
125:
119:
108:
101:
95:
88:
82:
75:
69:
62:
55:
49:
29:
234:investigate
123:investigate
340:CorporateM
332:CorporateM
324:Disclosure
197:block user
190:filter log
86:block user
79:filter log
42:Pauloperry
34:Pauloperry
22:Pauloperry
383:This diff
223:CheckUser
210:block log
203:spi block
112:CheckUser
99:block log
92:spi block
274:original
170:contribs
153:Intchar*
59:contribs
20: |
395:(talk)
240:cuwiki
129:cuwiki
291:body,
16:<
344:Talk
336:Talk
288:Here
282:here
278:Here
184:logs
158:talk
73:logs
47:talk
227:log
164:tag
116:log
53:tag
387:—
346:)
295:IT
229:)
216:CA
118:)
105:CA
365:.
342:(
334:(
243:)
237:·
231:·
225:(
220:·
213:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
187:·
181:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
156:(
132:)
126:·
120:·
114:(
109:·
102:·
96:·
89:·
83:·
76:·
70:·
63:·
56:·
50:·
45:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.