51:
137:
309:
Supporters of spoiler warnings pointed out that it had become common practice on the
Internet to give a warning about potential spoilers any time plot details were discussed—especially details about how a work of fiction ends—and that readers had come to expect such warnings as a form of courtesy
263:
Until late 2007, spoiler warnings, also known as spoiler disclaimers, were a frequent occurrence in
Knowledge (XXG) articles about works of fiction. However, by 2007, some editors were also including spoiler warnings in articles about myths, folklore, fairy tales, and even biblical stories. After
203:
This guidance also applies to other relevant information beyond simple plot elements, such as "surprise" casting information for a publicly released film. Other aspects beyond prose, such as infobox materials and categories, are also considered to be within this guidance; it is not acceptable to
292:
Labeling a plot detail as a spoiler would require editors to use their own subjective opinions to interpret the significance of a plot detail and its likelihood of altering the enjoyment of the work of fiction. This would be a violation of
Knowledge (XXG)'s core policies of
360:
165:. Articles on the Internet sometimes feature a spoiler warning to alert readers to spoilers in the text, which they may then choose to avoid reading. Knowledge (XXG) previously included such warnings in some articles, but no longer does so, except for the
288:
Sections that frequently contain spoiler warnings—such as plot summaries, episode lists, character descriptions, etc.—were already clearly named to indicate that they contain plot details. Therefore, further disclaimers would be redundant and
274:, other editors took notice and began questioning the prolific and unrestricted use of the disclaimers. After a series of long, contentious discussions, several issues with spoiler warnings were identified:
285:
No other academic, scholarly, or other professional publications that describe or analyze works of fiction, such as other encyclopedias, include disclaimers about spoilers when discussing said works.
212:
The same reasoning for including spoilers when appropriate in articles on works of fiction applies to other types of "spoilers" as well; for example, the optimal strategy for games such as
355:
372:
197:
333:
282:" guideline when many other disclaimers—such as warnings about offensive images or content and medical and legal disclaimers—would be of greater benefit to the reader.
157:
and no spoiler warnings. A spoiler is a piece of information about a narrative work (such as a book, film, television series, or a video game) that reveals
366:
398:
393:
58:
314:. However, editors could not reach a consensus about whether the presence of spoiler warnings in articles was an improvement to Knowledge (XXG).
279:
170:
328:
252:
302:
185:
294:
310:
even when most readers will ignore the disclaimers. Because of this, they argued that
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
323:
166:
204:
remove a category that is otherwise well-defining for the work's plot that otherwise could be considered to spoil the plot.
311:
66:
181:
298:
189:
74:
237:
145:
Spoilers are no different from any other content and should not be deleted solely because they are spoilers.
265:
270:
83:
70:
29:
25:
21:
184:
it within) an article because you think it spoils the plot. Such concerns must not interfere with
17:
229:
361:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines/Wikipedia:Spoiler warning
169:
and section headings (such as "Plot" or "Ending"), which imply the presence of spoilers. The "
158:
233:
153:
255:; it should contain information appropriate to an encyclopedia article on the subject.
188:, encyclopedic tone, completeness, or any other element of article quality (e.g., the
387:
241:
40:
221:
196:
is being served. Articles on a work of fiction should primarily describe it from a
278:
There was no strong basis to exclude disclaimers for potential spoilers from the "
173:" guideline explains why spoiler warnings are no longer used on Knowledge (XXG).
217:
213:
162:
356:
Knowledge (XXG):Templates for deletion/Log/2007 November 8 § Template:Spoiler
329:
Knowledge (XXG):What
Knowledge (XXG) is not § Knowledge (XXG) is not censored
36:
253:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a textbook, instruction manual, or video game guide
35:"WP:PREVIEWS" redirects here. For previewing edits before publishing, see
225:
180:
to add "spoiler warning" notices or to delete information from (or
131:
45:
192:). When including spoilers, editors should make sure that an
69:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
373:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Spoiler/old template talk/Archive 1
119:
112:
105:
98:
91:
200:, discussing its reception, impact, and significance.
334:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Writing about fiction
16:"WP:SW" redirects here. You may also be looking for
247:But note that this does not mean such information
232:programs, and live radio and television events
57:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
367:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Spoiler/old template talk
8:
363:(and many talk archives listed there), 2007
65:Editors should generally follow it, though
236:in certain areas of the world such as the
345:
259:Why spoiler warnings are no longer used
369:(formerly Template talk:Spoiler), 2007
151:Knowledge (XXG) articles may include
7:
399:Arts Knowledge (XXG) administration
394:Knowledge (XXG) content guidelines
324:Knowledge (XXG):Content disclaimer
73:. When in doubt, discuss first on
18:WikiProject Spoken Knowledge (XXG)
14:
135:
49:
352:For the main discussions, see:
1:
415:
280:No disclaimers in articles
171:No disclaimers in articles
81:
75:this guideline's talk page
34:
15:
39:. For page previews, see
143:This page in a nutshell:
238:Eurovision Song Contest
208:Other types of spoilers
198:real-world perspective
303:neutral point of view
271:The Three Little Pigs
268:to the article about
251:be included, either.
186:neutral point of view
26:WikiProject Star Wars
295:no original research
234:broadcast on a delay
194:encyclopedic purpose
22:WikiProject Software
264:such a warning was
220:, the solutions to
230:reality television
216:, the workings of
179:
167:content disclaimer
228:, the results of
224:, the answers to
177:
149:
148:
130:
129:
59:content guideline
406:
378:
350:
312:should not apply
139:
138:
132:
122:
115:
108:
101:
94:
53:
52:
46:
41:mw:Page Previews
414:
413:
409:
408:
407:
405:
404:
403:
384:
383:
382:
381:
351:
347:
342:
320:
261:
210:
136:
126:
125:
120:WP:SPOILERALERT
118:
111:
104:
97:
90:
86:
78:
50:
44:
33:
12:
11:
5:
412:
410:
402:
401:
396:
386:
385:
380:
379:
377:
376:
370:
364:
358:
344:
343:
341:
338:
337:
336:
331:
326:
319:
316:
307:
306:
290:
286:
283:
260:
257:
250:
209:
206:
195:
178:not acceptable
147:
146:
140:
128:
127:
124:
123:
116:
109:
102:
95:
87:
82:
79:
64:
63:
54:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
411:
400:
397:
395:
392:
391:
389:
374:
371:
368:
365:
362:
359:
357:
354:
353:
349:
346:
339:
335:
332:
330:
327:
325:
322:
321:
317:
315:
313:
304:
300:
299:verifiability
296:
291:
287:
284:
281:
277:
276:
275:
273:
272:
267:
258:
256:
254:
248:
245:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:logic puzzles
219:
215:
207:
205:
201:
199:
193:
191:
187:
183:
174:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
155:
144:
141:
134:
133:
121:
117:
114:
110:
107:
103:
100:
96:
93:
89:
88:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
62:
60:
55:
48:
47:
42:
38:
31:
27:
23:
19:
348:
308:
289:unnecessary.
269:
262:
246:
218:magic tricks
211:
202:
190:lead section
175:
152:
150:
142:
56:
375:, 2003–2004
214:tic-tac-toe
113:WP:SPOILERS
92:WP:PREVIEWS
388:Categories
161:points or
106:WP:SPOILER
67:exceptions
84:Shortcuts
71:consensus
37:H:PREVIEW
318:See also
242:Olympics
240:and the
154:spoilers
99:WP:SPOIL
30:SWViewer
226:riddles
301:, and
176:It is
163:twists
340:Notes
266:added
28:, or
249:must
182:hide
159:plot
24:,
390::
297:,
244:.
20:,
305:.
77:.
61:.
43:.
32:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.