53:
354:
118:
338:
Please realize that while you may personally dislike having a deletion tag on your favorite article/template/image/etc, the harm it does is minimal, and either the article or the tag will be gone in around a week. Also be aware that the speedy keep criteria, particularly the first three, are not to
184:
Absence of delete rationale. Normally the nominator will provide grounds for deletion in the delete rationale, but if (a) the nominator withdraws the nomination, perhaps because of improvements to the article that happen during the AfD, or (b) the nominator failed to give intelligible grounds for
334:
and the page renominated on the correct forum, with the original nomination, and any comments made so far, copied over to the new nomination. The closing comment should indicate where the discussion has been moved. This does not strictly count as a speedy keep, since the page still remains
233:, since questionable motivations on the part of the nominator do not have a direct bearing on the validity of the nomination, no uninvolved editor has recommended deletion or redirection as an outcome of the discussion. For example:
339:
be used to express strong disapproval of the nomination: a rationale that you don't agree with is still an argument for deletion, is not necessarily vexatious, and does not imply the nominator has neglected to read the page.
293:
and speedily deleted as a banned contribution. However, if subsequent editors added substantive comments in good faith before the nominator's blocked or banned status was discovered, the nomination may
135:
is the process of closing deletion discussions with a result of "speedy keep" before the normal discussion period ends, but without unlisting or deleting the actual discussion. This guideline applies
396:
close, and is not subject to any of the other criteria necessary for a speedy keep, but it is not a speedy keep criterion itself. Specifically, discussions must meet specific criteria to be
31:
201:
244:
nominations which are made solely to provide a forum for disruption, e.g. when a contestant in an edit war nominates an opponent's userpage solely for harassment
193:
If the nominator indicates that the nomination is procedural in nature, then the nomination is ineligible for speedy keep. This includes a "relist" result from
185:
content deletion (i.e. arguments that would support deletion, userfying or redirection, perhaps only proposing an alternative action such as moving or merging)
491:
408:" as opposed to a specific set of guidelines. For that reason, "snow closes" may be controversial and additional care is warranted. Though the two may
516:
308:. In such cases, please wait until the link is no longer on the Main Page before nominating. If the problem is urgent, consensus should be gained at
140:
60:
247:
making nominations of the same page with the same arguments immediately after they were strongly rejected in a recently closed deletion discussion
42:
197:, fixing errors in the nomination process, or if a user stated a page should be deleted on a talk page without actually nominating it.
126:
In certain circumstances, a deletion discussion can be closed with a result of "speedy keep" before the normal discussion period ends.
38:
486:
433:
429:
496:
458:
401:
330:
76:
68:
501:
268:
405:
272:
19:
This is a deletion guideline on entire articles. For the editing policy about keeping information in an article, see
445:
Unless all such comments support keeping the article, in which case the discussion may be closed as a speedy keep.
238:
367:
152:
85:
72:
20:
466:
309:
432:
but advocating a keep position. (If you want to record a rationale for the PROD-tag removal, see
287:
298:
be speedily closed (though the nominator's opinion will be discounted in the closure decision).
465:" instead of "keep". The procedure for administrators closing AfD discussions are laid out at
301:
The page is a policy or guideline. The deletion processes are not a forum for revoking policy.
207:
Where the nominator withdraws their nomination, check whether other editors still recommend a
389:
474:
470:
325:
321:
275:
at the time of making the nomination, so they were not supposed to edit. In that case, the
194:
250:
nominations that are clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where
251:
510:
215:
outcome before speedily closing. If a good-faith editor in good standing recommends
412:
similar, closes under the snowball clause should never be closed as "speedy keep."
362:
A "snowball clause" is not a speedy keep close, and the two should not be confused.
229:
The nomination was unquestionably made for the purposes of vandalism or disruption
204:
then suggestions to redirect the page are treated the same as moving or merging.
457:
When a discussion is closed as a speedy-keep, close the debate as you would a
305:
189:
no new delete rationale appears in the deletion discussion. Exceptions:
143:
cover the circumstances under which pages may be deleted immediately.
241:
nominations (such as recently featured content or April Fools jokes)
428:
An example of this includes posting a nomination in response to a
348:
112:
47:
223:, the AfD should not be speedily closed using this ground.
32:
Knowledge (XXG):Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
71:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
26:"WP:KEEP" redirects here. For any comments used as just "
469:
and for limited cases of non-administrator closings, at
375:
200:
If the nomination would otherwise qualify for close to
167:
160:
100:
93:
312:to remove the link before nominating for deletion.
59:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
37:"WP:SK" redirects here. You may be looking for
264:accurate deletion rationale has been provided.
434:Knowledge (XXG):Proposed deletion § Objecting
8:
304:The page/image is currently linked from the
316:If a page is nominated for deletion on the
67:Editors should generally follow it, though
400:kept. "Snowball closes" are justified by "
283:can be removed from the log, tagged with
260:The nomination is completely erroneous.
43:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Saskatchewan
421:
7:
453:When closing a debate as speedy-keep
406:Knowledge (XXG) is not a bureaucracy
39:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Slovakia
517:Knowledge (XXG) deletion guidelines
328:), the misplaced discussion may be
75:. When in doubt, discuss first on
16:Knowledge (XXG) deletion guideline
14:
492:Introduction to deletion process
352:
116:
51:
139:to "speedy keep" closures; the
392:" is a valid criterion for an
1:
320:(for example, a template on
254:is a more appropriate course
141:criteria for speedy deletion
360:This section in a nutshell:
279:is speedily kept while the
533:
365:
150:
83:
77:this guideline's talk page
36:
25:
18:
343:What is not a speedy-keep
335:nominated for deletion.
124:This page in a nutshell:
461:, but use the result "
239:frivolous or vexatious
471:nominator withdrawal
331:procedurally closed
497:Procedural closure
267:The nominator was
252:dispute resolution
61:deletion guideline
487:Guide to deletion
430:proposed deletion
386:
385:
324:or an article on
130:
129:
111:
110:
524:
446:
443:
437:
426:
402:Ignore all rules
378:
356:
355:
349:
292:
286:
170:
163:
120:
119:
113:
103:
96:
55:
54:
48:
532:
531:
527:
526:
525:
523:
522:
521:
507:
506:
502:Snowball clause
483:
455:
450:
449:
444:
440:
427:
423:
418:
390:snowball clause
382:
381:
374:
370:
353:
345:
290:
284:
257:
226:
202:speedy redirect
195:deletion review
174:
173:
166:
159:
155:
149:
117:
107:
106:
99:
92:
88:
80:
52:
46:
35:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
530:
528:
520:
519:
509:
508:
505:
504:
499:
494:
489:
482:
479:
459:standard close
454:
451:
448:
447:
438:
420:
419:
417:
414:
384:
383:
380:
379:
371:
366:
363:
357:
344:
341:
314:
313:
302:
299:
277:nominated page
265:
258:
256:
255:
248:
245:
242:
234:
227:
225:
224:
205:
198:
190:
180:decision are:
176:Reasons for a
172:
171:
164:
156:
151:
148:
145:
128:
127:
121:
109:
108:
105:
104:
97:
89:
84:
81:
66:
65:
56:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
529:
518:
515:
514:
512:
503:
500:
498:
495:
493:
490:
488:
485:
484:
480:
478:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
452:
442:
439:
435:
431:
425:
422:
415:
413:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
377:
373:
372:
369:
364:
361:
358:
351:
350:
347:
342:
340:
336:
333:
332:
327:
323:
319:
311:
307:
303:
300:
297:
289:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
263:
259:
253:
249:
246:
243:
240:
236:
235:
232:
228:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:
199:
196:
192:
191:
188:
183:
182:
181:
179:
169:
165:
162:
158:
157:
154:
147:Applicability
146:
144:
142:
138:
134:
125:
122:
115:
114:
102:
98:
95:
91:
90:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
64:
62:
57:
50:
49:
44:
40:
33:
29:
22:
462:
456:
441:
424:
409:
397:
393:
387:
359:
346:
337:
329:
317:
315:
295:
280:
276:
261:
230:
220:
216:
212:
208:
186:
177:
175:
136:
132:
131:
123:
58:
27:
463:speedy keep
318:wrong forum
178:speedy keep
133:Speedy keep
21:WP:PRESERVE
281:nomination
237:obviously
69:exceptions
467:WP:AFD/AI
376:WP:SK#NOT
310:WP:ERRORS
306:Main Page
288:db-banned
161:WP:SKCRIT
153:Shortcuts
86:Shortcuts
73:consensus
511:Category
481:See also
398:speedily
368:Shortcut
221:redirect
213:redirect
404:" and "
269:blocked
101:WP:KEEP
30:", see
273:banned
217:delete
209:delete
168:WP:CSK
416:Notes
394:early
388:The "
94:WP:SK
475:here
410:seem
137:only
28:keep
473:or
326:MfD
322:AfD
296:not
271:or
231:and
219:or
211:or
187:and
41:or
513::
477:.
436:.)
291:}}
285:{{
262:No
79:.
63:.
45:.
34:.
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.