Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Assault11

718:; however, in midst of the project, I observed similarities between Assault11 and Yeahsoo. Since WP:SOCK procedurals entail that I include everyone whom I suspect to be related to the sock puppeting case, I included Assault11. If I was only to include those that I'm really sure to be sock puppets, then that's falls on my misinterpretation of the WP:SOCK procedurals, not my "NPOV credibility". Now, a question to you: where in WP:SOCK does it say that if you mistaken a user as a sock puppet you lose credibility? And I'm assuming that you can't accuse someone of being a sock puppet if you're in a mediation with them? Ha. Bogus. ( 405:

and Chinese, but NEUTRAL) secondary sources. The main article about Goguryeo should contain a neutral description of the scholarly consensus on Goguryeo, which is that it was Korean. If there is a modern political dispute, then we cite a BBC article on it, neutrally describing the dispute, in a separate section about that dispute. Not a single word in this article should be a Wikipedian's interpretation of primary sources, Korean or Chinese. Etimesoy 22:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

441:. This study is shows long-term trends of the two users & may not be helpful as much as the individual instances listed above. It is possible that a single individual is dividing up his/her interests in order to kill two birds with the same stone (to avoid suspicion & to make that attempt more interesting). 1367:. This case probably should be sent there, since the SSP page receives very little admin attention. If this case is filed at WP:RCU, I would strongly recommend that you make the evidence much shorter; a lot of the stuff above seems like complaints, rather than a concise presentation of policy violations. 1128:

At the same time, you haven't responded to the fact that I am speaking within a framework in which I already assume that those I accused are sock puppets. I think that "personal attacks" are usually name calling, cussing, insults on religious & national basis, etc. Referring to somebody as a sock

960:

Why, am I forcing them? This is a "if" scenario (like I would mind giving away my IP address). And specify where in the Knowledge (XXG)'s policies admins can block users for asking an "if scenario" question? There's such a thing as freedom of speech here. You know, there are other admins too. There's

754:

I think that Ksyrie might not really be a puppet master. In fact, it's quite clear that Yeahsoo, Assault11, and Time of flight are related to each other. I think I'm on the right track right now. If anyone wants to question my "NPOV credibility" as a Wikipedian, just check my contributions. I was POV

735:

on a discussion, he is proper with all Wiki language (including "::"). He knows how to sign "~~~~" even though nobody told him. And he only talked on "Talk:Goguryeo". Quite interesting. His 11th edit makes it to WP:SOCK! Wow. I think I might drop accusation on Assault11, & place a new one on you.

419:

To advance,I will take an exemple,before 1800,the USA was limited in her original 13 states.At that time the Louisiana wasn't seen as American as Today,and the frech lived in Louisiana were not recognised as Amercan.And Before the Mexican–American War in 1846,the New Mexico wasn't seen as American as

334:

Furthermore, the areas of participation in the discussion by the users can also be separate in certain cases. For example, Yeahsoo's the only one who talks to me directly @ my own posts while Ksyrie creates his own post as a reply to mine. In other posts, only one of the two participates extensively

807:

Exactly why? You can do the calculations yourself. If you want, I'll explain to you every bit of the info I've posted w/ reference to the dates. I don't get you. That was a new mistake that I made in attempt to fix a previous mistake. I mean, why would I try to fix a mistake while making mistakes on

495:

He has never communicated with another user on user talk pages except on mine b/c I accused him of being a sock puppet. That's kind of weird (if we were to assume that s/he's not a sock puppet). But it's not weird if you were to assume that he was indeed a puppet (b/c the puppet master already knows

389:

Very true, this is a fake topic, since even Liao people is very difficult to trace the population of descendants. It is impossible the trace numbers descendants of Goguryeo or Balhae, the only reasonable evidence is the record on tombstone or family tree book. But it is unfair to Korea, since by the

1333:

I have no access to checkuser; therefore, nothing close to complete can be resolved -- but -- I checked into the 24-hour 3RR block I imposed on Assault11 back on March 6, and Ksyrie's edits were not disrupted by that block; if Assault11 and Ksyrie were editing from the same IP, a block on Assault11

404:

You guys keep completely missing the point. This article should not be "Chinese POV" or "Korean POV" or even a mix of Korean and Chinese POV. This article in its entirety should be NEUTRAL point of view. That means relying on independent neutral (not Korean, not Chinese, not a combination of Korean

330:

At the same time, Ksyrie, Yeahsoo (and Assault11) rarely communicate with each other, unlike other editors who side one way or the other on the CPOV-KPOV dispute. I believe that any human being would recognize the ineffectiveness of such modus operandi because of the such importance & magnitude

699:

Anybody can see Assault11 and Ksyrie can not be the same person simply by looking at their writing style. It's despicable that wikimachine is making this kind of allegation right at this point as a strategy to win the mediation. If they are not socket puppets as you have claimed, you lose all your

379:

Your claims are really original research. Its not very easy to make an accurate estimate as to how many Goguryeo people assimiliated into where. Also, you must remember that Balhae considered itself as the successor to Goguryeo and most Goguryeo people followed Dae Jo-young, the founder of Balhae.

995:

Could you explain further? There's difference between a discussion & a vandalous edit. Edit is something that's already been done. As for the discussion, it's not only the one who first makes a suggestion but also those who reply who constitute the final results of that discussion. Seems that

867:

It has become obvious that the Koreans have no genuine interest in this round of mediation. Unfortunately, the Koreans have even reduced themselves to employ dirty tactics that question the very existance of the users in question (myself included). This comes as no surprise considering similar

450:

In conclusion, a single generalization cannot be made about their activities (in a theoretical world where they are indeed sock puppets). A combination of different strategies and considerations can turn out to make sock puppet accusations impossible & often self-contradictory; however, at

372:

Culturally,Korea inherit more Goguryeo than China,but for their offsprings,It is a question to be interesting.50% in Korea?I doubt,take in account to area of Silla occupying Goguryeo,maybe 30%.So what about the other 70%? and what about the people living in the 70%,did they dispear???Obviously

400:

Again, no chance for stuff to be listed, like descendants of Goguryeo found in China, and Goguryeo use Chinese characters as writing system, and how Goguryeo kept as a vassal to China in hundreds years.(I bet some Korean hero rather undo this article everyminute than let this to be listed on

477:

As for this user, s/he might not even be a sock puppet of Ksyrie. It might even turn out that Ksyrie is innocent & Yeahsoo & Assault11 are the real sock puppet & puppeteer. However, I feel that it is necessary to check this user in case the main three I suspect might not be the

423:

Some very good points Wangkon. However, I recommend that you save your arguments and evidence for the mediation. That's what I'm doing. I doubt any of the current participants(Assault11, Ksyrie, Yeahsoo, Endroit) here can be convinced otherwise. Cydevil 05:30, 16 March 2007

913:

Wow. Are you forreal? Is this a joke or something? Seriously now, do you honestly go around spewing out - for the lack of a better term - "stupid" questions like this? If anything, it would be in your utmost interest to NOT further reduce your stature by succumbing to non

1362:

I'm not an admin, but I want to make sure that the people who are following this case understand that this page is not Checkuser. Cases filed on this page are judged on the basis of the accounts' behavior only. If IP confirmation is needed, this case needs to be filed at

1202:: either we are allowed to assume that the accused are sock puppets & the if-clause doesn't apply but at the same time there's no harm done, or we are ont allowed to assume that the accused are sock puppets,but the if-clause applies and there's no harm done. 408:

I am totally supporting your thinking,But the problem is that whenever there is some sources which favoured somehow chinese claim,it was deleted quickly or modified.it seems a bit of self-censorship by the korean side.--Ksyrie 22:47, 15 March 2007

1212:

Again, my suggestion was "if-clause" & also procedural as in proving whether somebody is a sock puppet or not. However, getting their IP address is not the end to a means but a means to an end. Within that context, it is not a threat.

868:

attempts by Cydevil to put down any dissent or opposition to his/her own view. Upon proven innocent, you will realize we are all separate entities who share the same views on the issue. Like I said before, we got nothing to lose, bring it.

427:

Really, then why salon.com refer you as a key wiki fighter keeps undo edits, if you really behave that reasonable as you claimed. Well, it is not important now, just hope you will obey the rule in future.--Yeahsoo 20:48, 16 March 2007

1064:

Furthermore, you should specify where in the laws Knowledge (XXG) bans demand for IP address b/c I think that's very unlikely. I could ask my fellow Wikipedians for their IP address, & they could either tell me or they could not.

657:

Ha, glad to meet you here, Ksyrie. See, someone think if others are thinking different than him, then they must be guilty. I am amazed that that guy spend so much time to invest our speech, hope he could learn the valuable thing in

373:

no,some became Khitan,some became Jurchen,maybe some became Mongol,and some became Manchu,some became Han Chinese.And the 30% goguryeo became nowadays Korean,and they want the whole of Goguryeo.LOL--Ksyrie 20:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

820:

I didn't do the data myself, as for the top 6 main articles you've edited. It was user edit count tool, which I had linked by your name in the table. Also, I think that you have to click "older 500" in order to show everything.

901:

I've happened to step on an unknown IP address user's edit that seemed highly related to this case, so I began intensely on all of you users' IP addresses. There's nothing to hide. Just tell the truth. What's your IP address?

546:(cur) (last) 21:32, 23 February 2007 Assault11 (Talk | contribs) (→Modern politics - Clarified some Chinese arguments. There was no proof that North Koreans are descedants of Gaogouli or migration of Gaogoulis into China.) 522:(cur) (last) 15:53, 24 February 2007 Nlu (Talk | contribs) (rv to earlier version edited by Easterknight; subsequent edits caused formatting problems with the section; this is not intended to be a substantive edit) 755:

in my first edits & those edits were terrible in grammar, contents, etc. But that just proves that I was new to Knowledge (XXG) & I was also a kid then. My edits since last year are.... perhaps very NPOV. (

613:

923:

I don't know why you'd react that way, unless you were really a sock puppet & really unwilling to tell me your IP address. I already know, but I want to find out who's lying. Why, is this against the rules?

831:

Actually, I copied and pasted on the wrong column. If you look in the history, you'll see that I had made a mistake in my copy-paste procedure & I tried to fix it. I guess I missed that one. I'll fix it.

1208:"Unless you are a sock puppet" can only apply if I was making a threat to get their IP address (why, so that I can hack into their computers?), not the identification of the users as either sock puppets 1447:, for example). They will not be acted on here (by me, anyway), due to a thorough lack of evidence presented. (Specifically, this is now a report against Assault11; those accounts may still be 1443:), et al., are not proper sockpuppetry accusations; rather, they're accusations of, effectively, edit warring and vandalism without sufficient evidence of sockpuppetry. File in proper places ( 617:

That he made his 11th edit on WP:SOCK shocks me, but what shocks me more is that he seems to know about Knowledge (XXG) very well - almost too well b/c he talks about "NPOV credibility"! LOL.

525:(cur) (last) 15:37, 24 February 2007 Assault11 (Talk | contribs) (I'd like to remind you the name Gaogouli was written in traditional Chinese, also "C" comes before "K" in the latin alphabet) 714:

The terms you've dictated on the table are not realistic. Let me explain that I at first aimed at Ksyrie & Yeahsoo (you can clearly observe that because I worked only on those two on

1153:

that they are sockpuppets, and it's up to the admin with checkuser authority to determine whether they are. Until shown to be sockpuppets, they are presumed to be non-sockpuppets. --

946:

entitled to demand people's IP addresses. The users with checkuser privilege will decide whether your request will be accepted. Not you. Do this again and you'll draw a block. --

1337:

The same cannot be said about Yeahsoo and Time of flight, neither of whom edited during the window of that block. This doesn't prove sockpuppetry; it just does not disprove it.

971:

Let me think again. This is ridiculous. Also, I'd really like to hear other admins WHO ARE NOT IN THE GOGURYEO DISPUTE. Wow. Somebody threatened to block me. I'm shocked. (

1314: 1053:

Second, the accusation of sock puppetry already presumes that the accuser accuses the accused of sock puppetry. And I was speaking within that framework of discourse. (

47: 1466:

Closing this one up as unlikely. There's a lot of mudslinging, but very little hard evidence, and Checkuser has already confirmed that the users are not IP-related.

728:

By the way, I wonder how in the world a user named "Time of flight" would come by to this discussion. Maybe s/he's the real sock puppet? Sounds like it. Look at

312:

A very strong observation is that their intervals of activity at the discussion page Goguryeo alternate. Take a look at the time when the signatures were posted

570:(cur) (last) 20:25, 23 February 2007 Assault11 (Talk | contribs) (Please provide proof of Peking Uni's stance on the issue with the original Chinese sources) 682: 255: 1440: 942:

Wikimachine, this very last comment is exceedingly inappropriate. You are allowed to make requests for someone to look into sockpuppetry. You are

686:. Wikimachine, please don't forget to sign with a '''Agree''' or a '''Disagree''' on that page. You're the only one who didn't sign. Thank you.-- 1027:

This is inappropriate, because this constitutes taunting, and is a less-than-implied demand for IP address. It comes close to, if it is not, a

420:

Today,and the mexican lived there were not recognised as Amercan as Today.Ok,I had finished my little speech.--Ksyrie 05:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

165: 1248:

Your invitation is accepted. You have been blocked for 48 hours. Do it again after your block expires, and the block will be one week. --

249: 214: 43: 1271:'s policies on why asking people for their IPs is improper. As the checkuser admins often put, checkuser is not a fishing expedition. -- 451:

specific instances of the editors' edits, that the two users Yeahsoo and Assault11 are sock puppets of Ksyrie can be seen quite clearly.

91: 1195:"Unless you're really a sock puppet" is an if-clause. That means that that is personal attack only if the user is indeed a sock puppet. 17: 1205:

Calling somebody a sock puppet is procedural. "unless you're a sock puppet" is different from "You are a sock puppet, and I know it."

770: 715: 438: 354: 317: 842:

You can check it yourself,I have checked the "older 500",but my name didn't appear.Maybe somethigs go wrong for the count tool.--

534:(cur) (last) 09:50, 24 February 2007 Easternknight (Talk | contribs) m (no way should the Chinese name be before the Korean name) 1395:

Actually, it does. Assault11, and Yeahsoo combined engaged in 3RR violation (if we were to assume that they're sock puppets). (

261: 159: 141: 1022:

I don't know why you'd react that way, unless you were really a sock puppet & really unwilling to tell me your IP address.

528:(cur) (last) 10:59, 24 February 2007 Good friend100 (Talk | contribs) (rv, why does it matter if the Korean name is on top?) 981:

Shocked or not, your comment was still inappropriate. There's nothing conditional about your statement. Don't evade. --

386:

Clearly, some did. Also just as clearly, some were incorporated into Liao Dynasty. --Nlu (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

208: 1434: 267: 85: 1451:

s sockpuppet, but there's no evidence presented that they are Assault11's. File a separate report if you have to.) --

342:

Yeahsoo & Assault11 are less considerate of their language than Ksyrie. All three of them are terrible in English.

1125:

Only those concerning death threats & others of such severity. Repeated personal attacks result in arbitration.

543:(cur) (last) 21:46, 23 February 2007 Good friend100 (Talk | contribs) (→Dispute between China and South Korea - rv) 383:

After the collapse of Balhae?Did the remnant of Balhae become the modern Korean?--Ksyrie 09:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

323:

And they often form "1) statement by Ksyrie 2) reply by another user 3)criticism by Yeahsoo" type of 2-bind blocks.

171: 796:'s comparison is not credible,whether he or she fired into the wrong flock or deliberately making such mistakes-- 531:(cur) (last) 10:43, 24 February 2007 Yeahsoo (Talk | contribs) (←Undid revision 110597772 by Easternknight (talk)) 335:

while the other is silent (often it's too surprising that both of them would not participate in that single topic)

1117: 127: 1071:

At the same time, I'd like all others -Ksyrie, Yeahsoo, Time of flight, and Assault11, to reply to my request. (

243: 220: 1385:

Thanks for your suggestion, but I don't think that the situation meets the requirements specified by WP:RCU. (

549:(cur) (last) 21:12, 23 February 2007 Easternknight (Talk | contribs) m (→Modern politics - 900 years not 700) 46:. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, 23: 1430: 376:

I could not understand what you're trying to communicate. AQu01rius (User • Talk) 00:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

177: 97: 1105: 390:

time few Korean know how to write (no offense), so it is meaningless --Yeahsoo 23:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

226: 1198:

However, we're supposed to assume that the accused are not sock puppets. Within that context, here's a

202: 1472: 1460: 1414: 1399: 1389: 1376: 1353: 1321: 1294: 1280: 1257: 1242: 1233: 1217: 1180: 1162: 1133: 1089: 1057: 1044: 1000: 990: 975: 965: 955: 928: 918: 906: 881: 872: 855: 846: 836: 825: 812: 800: 788: 759: 740: 722: 690: 671: 662: 652: 629: 506: 461: 292: 103: 1167:

Further, personal attacks are only referred to arbitration if they are non-disruptive. (Again, see

1372: 701: 238: 153: 135: 659: 331:

of the dispute. Furthermore, Ksyrie & Yeahsoo do communicate with users other than themselves.

197: 1467: 496:

what this user should do & so the user does not need to discuss his agenda with anyone else).

599:

Now, this user really humors me. I already posted my evidence in the discussion. Here's a copy.

731:. Only 11 edits. He first creates his user page as his first edit (quite experienced), on his 729: 609:. Only 11 edits. He first creates his user page as his first edit (quite experienced), on his 607: 585:(cur) (last) 17:16, 23 February 2007 Korea history (Talk | contribs) m (→Silla-Tang invasion) 1396: 1386: 1334:(as I disabled all edits from his IP as part of the block option) would have blocked Ksyrie. 1318: 1291: 1239: 1214: 1130: 1072: 1066: 1054: 1050:

Then that should be considered a personal attack, not a vandalous edit that entails a block.

997: 972: 962: 925: 903: 878: 852: 833: 822: 809: 793: 774: 756: 737: 719: 641: 626: 503: 458: 289: 79: 1444: 1364: 1287: 1268: 1168: 1098: 1032: 1028: 1368: 915: 869: 668: 148: 131: 61: 36:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry.

1456: 1410: 1349: 1276: 1253: 1229: 1176: 1158: 1113: 1085: 1040: 986: 951: 350: 121: 687: 1199: 843: 797: 785: 778: 649: 573:(cur) (last) 20:20, 23 February 2007 Easternknight (Talk | contribs) (→See also) 74: 57: 513:

Additionally, this user has engaged in edit warfare with other users, as shown

1188:

Ok. I'm tired of this accusation-defend thingie. So, here are the offenses.

1238:

Whatever? Not again... Try, and I'll talk to another admin to unblock me. (

1452: 1406: 1345: 1272: 1249: 1225: 1172: 1154: 1109: 1081: 1036: 982: 947: 645: 117: 42:

No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the

1340:

With this being the case, I am modifying the report as a report against

1290:

only says that you can't apply for check user to prove your innocence. (

644:

attacked me is just I and him hold the differnet view in the article of

640:

It's non-sense.I know nothing about the other two users.They reason why

488:

He joined only a month ago. And he's quite familiar with Wiki language.

1171:.) Disruptive personal attacks -- and yours count -- is blockable. -- 349:

Evidence on the alternating usage can be found at the history tab of

808:

purpose? Editors w/ good faith wouldn't make such accusations. (

582:(cur) (last) 19:35, 23 February 2007 Cydevil (Talk | contribs) m 567:(cur) (last) 20:36, 23 February 2007 Assault11 (Talk | contribs) 564:(cur) (last) 20:37, 23 February 2007 Assault11 (Talk | contribs) 561:(cur) (last) 20:37, 23 February 2007 Assault11 (Talk | contribs) 558:(cur) (last) 20:41, 23 February 2007 Assault11 (Talk | contribs) 555:(cur) (last) 20:41, 23 February 2007 Assault11 (Talk | contribs) 537:(cur) (last) 22:00, 23 February 2007 Assault11 (Talk | contribs) 680:

FYI: Everybody listed here is party to a particular mediation

316:. Statistics on their periods of user activity is presented at 313: 579:(cur) (last) 20:09, 23 February 2007 Yeahsoo (Talk | contribs) 576:(cur) (last) 20:19, 23 February 2007 Yeahsoo (Talk | contribs) 552:(cur) (last) 20:45, 23 February 2007 Yeahsoo (Talk | contribs) 1078:

Stricken as improper; do it again and a block will result.

540:(cur) (last) 21:57, 23 February 2007 70.137.104.118 (Talk) 782: 732: 610: 514: 489: 482: 273: 232: 183: 109: 1224:

Whatever. Again, do it again you will be blocked. --

1315:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for checkuser/Case/Assault11

1191:

Your arguments are flawed for the following reasons:

781:,But In fact if you have ever looked at the history 485:, this user has edited only on Goguryeo & Balhae. 1129:

puppet is only a part of the procedural language. (

677:Now that we've got everybody's attention here .... 130:) after review of contributions and block log of 1017:The problematic part of your comment was this: 683:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Goguryeo 353:, and also some of the examples listed in the 24:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Ksyrie 8: 1035:. It's therefore a violation of policy. -- 437:Statistical analysis on the two users is 401:wiki)--Yeahsoo 21:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 380:Good friend100 00:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 1344:and removing Ksyrie from the report. -- 877:Let's not form "we" here. Who's "we"? ( 18:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets 1097:Personal attacks are blockable. See 7: 1149:that they are sockpuppets. You can 851:nNo, I agree with you. I fixed it. ( 769:There are somethings wrong for the 31: 771:User:Wikimachine/Sock Puppet Data 716:User:Wikimachine/Sock_Puppet_Data 700:crediblity as a NPOV wikipedian. 355:User:Wikimachine/Sock_Puppet_Data 318:User:Wikimachine/Sock_Puppet_Data 784:,My name didn't appear at all.-- 996:you're the one who's evading. ( 1: 777:claims that I had edited the 648:.I will let him to play.LOL-- 1069:00:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)) 1075:00:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)) 1490: 1473:11:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 1461:17:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 1415:17:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 1400:16:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 1390:16:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 1377:01:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1354:00:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1322:16:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 1295:00:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1281:00:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1258:00:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1243:00:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1234:00:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1218:00:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1181:00:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1163:00:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1134:00:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1090:00:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1058:23:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 1045:23:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 1001:23:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 991:22:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 976:18:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 966:18:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 956:18:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 929:17:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 919:17:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 907:05:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 882:18:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 873:17:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 856:18:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 847:17:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 837:17:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 826:17:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 813:18:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 801:17:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 789:17:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 760:16:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 741:16:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 723:16:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 691:19:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 672:19:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 663:17:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 653:04:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 630:16:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 507:16:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 462:04:41, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 357:can be attributed to that. 293:04:41, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 50:for detailed instructions. 360:Evidence of 2-bind blocks 39:Please do not modify it. 68:Suspected sockpuppeteer 1141:The thing is, you are 961:no single rule here. ( 44:talk page of this case 193:Suspected sockpuppets 1429:Accusations against 1405:Then file a RCU. -- 304:Ksyrie & Yeahsoo 285:Report submission by 1031:, and is certainly 481:If you look at the 1431:DefenderofGaogouli 1471: 1267:In any case, see 1122: 1108:comment added by 483:user contribution 22:(Redirected from 1481: 1470: 1313:It was filed at 1121: 1102: 794:User:Wikimachine 775:User:Wikimachine 667:Nothing to lose. 492:is his 4th edit. 277: 256:deleted contribs 236: 215:deleted contribs 187: 166:deleted contribs 113: 92:deleted contribs 41: 27: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1103: 1029:personal attack 457:All the best, ( 241: 200: 151: 116:-- stricken by 77: 65: 37: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1487: 1485: 1476: 1464: 1463: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1380: 1379: 1357: 1356: 1338: 1335: 1330: 1329: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1303: 1299: 1298: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1196: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1126: 1123: 1062: 1061: 1051: 1025: 1024: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 969: 935: 934: 933: 932: 899: 898: 897: 896: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 829: 818: 817: 816: 766: 765: 764: 763: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 726: 707: 706: 705: 704: 702:Time of flight 694: 693: 678: 638: 637: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 615: 601: 600: 594: 593: 591:Time of flight 587: 586: 583: 580: 577: 574: 571: 568: 565: 562: 559: 556: 553: 550: 547: 544: 541: 538: 535: 532: 529: 526: 523: 519: 518: 500: 499: 498: 497: 493: 486: 479: 472: 471: 455: 454: 453: 452: 445: 444: 443: 442: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 425: 421: 416: 415: 411: 410: 406: 402: 397: 396: 392: 391: 387: 384: 381: 377: 374: 369: 368: 362: 361: 358: 344: 343: 339: 338: 337: 336: 332: 325: 324: 321: 307: 306: 300: 299: 287: 286: 281: 278: 239:Time of flight 237: 195: 194: 190: 189: 188: 115: 70: 69: 64: 62:User:Assault11 54: 53: 52: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1486: 1475: 1474: 1469: 1468:Seraphimblade 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1403: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1391: 1388: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1301: 1300: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1207: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1189: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1135: 1132: 1127: 1124: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1100: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1068: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1023: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1002: 999: 994: 993: 992: 988: 984: 980: 979: 977: 974: 970: 967: 964: 959: 958: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 930: 927: 922: 921: 920: 917: 912: 911: 910: 908: 905: 894: 893: 892: 891: 883: 880: 876: 875: 874: 871: 866: 857: 854: 850: 849: 848: 845: 841: 840: 838: 835: 830: 827: 824: 819: 814: 811: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 799: 795: 792: 791: 790: 787: 783: 780: 776: 772: 768: 767: 761: 758: 753: 752: 751: 750: 742: 739: 734: 730: 727: 724: 721: 717: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 703: 698: 697: 696: 695: 692: 689: 685: 684: 679: 676: 675: 674: 673: 670: 665: 664: 661: 655: 654: 651: 647: 643: 635: 634: 633: 631: 628: 616: 612: 608: 605: 604: 603: 602: 598: 597: 596: 595: 592: 589: 588: 584: 581: 578: 575: 572: 569: 566: 563: 560: 557: 554: 551: 548: 545: 542: 539: 536: 533: 530: 527: 524: 521: 520: 516: 512: 511: 510: 508: 505: 494: 491: 487: 484: 480: 476: 475: 474: 473: 470: 467: 466: 465: 463: 460: 449: 448: 447: 446: 440: 436: 435: 426: 422: 418: 417: 413: 412: 407: 403: 399: 398: 394: 393: 388: 385: 382: 378: 375: 371: 370: 366: 365: 364: 363: 359: 356: 352: 351:talk:Goguryeo 348: 347: 346: 345: 341: 340: 333: 329: 328: 327: 326: 322: 319: 315: 311: 310: 309: 308: 305: 302: 301: 297: 296: 295: 294: 291: 284: 283: 282: 279: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 257: 254: 251: 248: 245: 240: 234: 231: 228: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 199: 192: 191: 185: 182: 179: 176: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 150: 147: 146: 145: 143: 140: 137: 133: 129: 126: 123: 119: 114: 111: 108: 105: 102: 99: 96: 93: 90: 87: 84: 81: 76: 67: 66: 63: 60: 59: 55: 51: 49: 45: 40: 34: 33: 25: 19: 1465: 1448: 1437: 1341: 1312: 1266: 1211: 1190: 1187: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1104:— Preceding 1077: 1070: 1063: 1026: 1021: 1016: 943: 900: 681: 666: 656: 639: 624: 590: 501: 468: 456: 303: 288: 280: 270: 264: 258: 252: 246: 229: 223: 217: 211: 205: 196: 180: 174: 168: 162: 156: 138: 124: 106: 100: 94: 88: 82: 72: 71: 56: 38: 35: 1397:Wikimachine 1387:Wikimachine 1369:--Akhilleus 1328:Conclusions 1319:Wikimachine 1292:Wikimachine 1240:Wikimachine 1215:Wikimachine 1200:double bind 1145:allowed to 1131:Wikimachine 1073:Wikimachine 1067:Wikimachine 1055:Wikimachine 998:Wikimachine 973:Wikimachine 963:Wikimachine 926:Wikimachine 904:Wikimachine 879:Wikimachine 853:Wikimachine 834:Wikimachine 823:Wikimachine 810:Wikimachine 779:Taisho Jima 757:Wikimachine 738:Wikimachine 720:Wikimachine 642:Wikimachine 627:Wikimachine 504:Wikimachine 459:Wikimachine 290:Wikimachine 58:User:Ksyrie 1307:RCU filed. 914:sequiturs. 733:first edit 611:first edit 268:block user 262:page moves 227:block user 221:page moves 178:block user 172:page moves 104:block user 98:page moves 1342:Assault11 916:Assault11 870:Assault11 773:in which 669:Assault11 469:Assault11 274:block log 233:block log 184:block log 149:Assault11 132:Assault11 110:block log 48:read this 1449:someone' 1441:contribs 1118:contribs 1106:unsigned 646:Goguryeo 636:Comments 614:WP:SOCK! 606:Look at 298:Evidence 250:contribs 209:contribs 160:contribs 142:contribs 128:contribs 86:contribs 1033:uncivil 895:Request 688:Endroit 660:Yeahsoo 198:Yeahsoo 1445:WP:ANI 1365:WP:RCU 1288:WP:RCU 1269:WP:RCU 1169:WP:NPA 1151:allege 1147:assume 1099:WP:NPA 844:Ksyrie 798:Ksyrie 786:Ksyrie 650:Ksyrie 75:Ksyrie 658:it.-- 478:ones. 428:(UTC) 424:(UTC) 409:(UTC) 16:< 1457:talk 1435:talk 1411:talk 1373:talk 1350:talk 1286:No, 1277:talk 1254:talk 1230:talk 1177:talk 1159:talk 1114:talk 1086:talk 1041:talk 987:talk 952:talk 515:here 490:This 439:here 314:here 244:talk 203:talk 154:talk 136:talk 122:talk 80:talk 1453:Nlu 1407:Nlu 1346:Nlu 1317:. ( 1273:Nlu 1250:Nlu 1226:Nlu 1173:Nlu 1155:Nlu 1143:not 1110:Nlu 1101:. 1082:Nlu 1037:Nlu 983:Nlu 948:Nlu 944:not 118:Nlu 1459:) 1413:) 1402:) 1392:) 1375:) 1352:) 1324:) 1302:WP 1279:) 1256:) 1245:) 1232:) 1220:) 1179:) 1161:) 1120:) 1116:• 1088:) 1080:-- 1043:) 989:) 978:) 954:) 909:) 839:) 632:) 509:) 464:) 144:) 73:* 1455:( 1438:· 1433:( 1409:( 1371:( 1348:( 1297:) 1275:( 1252:( 1228:( 1213:( 1175:( 1157:( 1136:) 1112:( 1084:( 1065:( 1060:) 1039:( 1003:) 985:( 968:) 950:( 931:) 924:( 902:( 884:) 858:) 832:( 828:) 821:( 815:) 762:) 743:) 736:( 725:) 625:( 517:. 502:( 414:3 395:2 367:1 320:. 276:) 271:· 265:· 259:· 253:· 247:· 242:( 235:) 230:· 224:· 218:· 212:· 206:· 201:( 186:) 181:· 175:· 169:· 163:· 157:· 152:( 139:· 134:( 125:· 120:( 112:) 107:· 101:· 95:· 89:· 83:· 78:( 26:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Suspected sock puppets/Assault11 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index