1706:, the two of ye have come up with no evidence - 1. If Sligobhoy67 was me on here what abuse of policy would have been carried out? NONE! 2. Like I said I can prove beyond a shoadow of a doubt that I am not Sligobhoy67 and i have never asked him to post on any forums for or on behalf of me, I do not deny that there is a link between but we are not the same person. I suppose you would be happy if I could show that we both had edited wiki from different countries on the same day, that would shut the two of ye up wouldnt it! I have already provide much of this information to an admin who emailed me some days ago but like I said earlier I am not perpared to divulge the information here for privacy reasons. If someone comes forward and nominates themselves as a closing admin then I will be prepared to provide them with the exact information.--
1739:
nothing about your editing pattern that could prove "beyond a shoadow of a doubt" that you are different people. Combine that with the fact that SB67 has twice said he is you, and that he was stacking votes for you, and I think there is a little more than "no evidence" he is your sock. However, lets for a moment say you are different people. If you can provide us with information about SB67's edit history and location, then you clearly have a relationship with him. Perhaps you could ask him to come online and tell us why he said he was you, and chose to stack votes for you without your knowledge?
1498:
Celticminded responded to SB's request. I think that is stronger evidence that three meatpuppets were recruited, if you identify the possible meatpuppet accounts in those AfDs, you are left with the editors listed above. That said, I wouldn't endorse any movement to sanction these editors for past indiscretions, even if the evidence was stronger. Its the meatpuppeteer that is the problem, not really the meatpuppets, who may indeed turn into useful editors. However, it would be much better if they were upfront about their past circumstances, rather than peddling untruths.
1797:
then that is fine - but he may not wish to be the closing admin. This is my last comment to anyone who is not the closing admin because we are going around in circles, if you wish to "convict" me based purely on cirmcumstantial unverified evidence that can be explained away relavtively easily to a closing admin just satisfy your campaign then crack on - I am prepared to facilitate the closing admin with phonecalls, emails and any other proofs which they wish but I am not prepared to reveal private information on here for anyone.--
531:
would endorse a similar report into the behaviour of those editors also. Finally, while Coeur-sang's denials (below) now appear to be highly suspect, those who were asked to be meatpuppets are not usually sanctioned. I would suggest this is a good opportunity for all those individuals listed above to consider being honest about the circumstances in which they found themselves !voting at
Vintagekits AfD's, and use it to make a fresh start and put the meatpuppetry behind them.
565:
article or tell me where it is and I will do it. As usual REMEMBER - BEFORE you edit you have to register a name, NOT TOO FENIAN OR PROVO EITHER, I am called "VINTAGEKITS" on the site, Once registered THEN EDIT a number of pages such as your local town, GAA club anything JUST MAKE A NUMBER OF EDITS, THEN AFTER A NUMBER OF DAYS PLOUGH INTO THE FENIAN STUFF - BE SUBTLE - THE KEY IS BE COOL, BE SUBTLE! If you need ANY help just ask.
1617:, feel free to offer your opinion. My personal opinion is that I'm not particularly predisposed to cutting Vintagekits some slack while both he Coeur-sang appear to be continuing to deny any involvement in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. If the editors were to come clean with the entire truth, and give their assurance this sort of thing wouldn't happen again, then I'm not sure any further action need be taken.
1443:
as an admin, with a request for help in submitting it. After checking its validity, I provided it for the community to decide. To supress it would have been a serious abuse of the trust put in admin. If you can prove "beyond a shadow of a doubt that these people are neither my sock or meatpuppets" then I suggest you do so publically and we can all go back to something more productive.
1225:
these people to whom you refer. I also understand now that your attitude towards new members is designed to keep your numbers low and therefore your power high. Is it any wonder you are not increasing your membership? So when will you let me know the results of this witch hunt. After all thats exactly what it is. If I edit I'm a witch and if I don't... well burn her anyway
1652:. For the record, I did not contact anyone else about any of the AFDs I participated in that are listed there, seeking support or otherwise; nor was I contacted by anyone. I have already indicated to ONiH that he left out any reference to keep votes I made on the republican pages listed there. (I also voted 'keep' when that particular page was nominated for deletion).
1349:
Coeur-sang like any other editor is to be credited with an independent brain, and also to be believed. If Coeur-sang says she had not been emailed that is fine - if she has been emailed that is equally fine. You are trying to build a case that you will never manage to prove. In fact you risk damaging the reputation of valuable editors without the grounds for doing so.
1403:, I have stayed off this attack page for a reason - that reason is that editors are putting 2&2 together and getting 55! I am not going to justify myself to the whrilling dervishes on here but if the closing admin wishes to contact me via email (for privacy reasons) I can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that these people are neither my sock or meatpuppets.--
1679:. Likewise, I don't feel it is appropriate I close this, given I presented a significant amount of evidence. I am also left with little doubt about what went on here and have asked a few other admins to take a look, if they have to time, and form their own opinion. No takers yet. If we hear no more in the next 24hrs, I suggest we ask
1796:
I have provided you with all the information I am prepared provide you with for privacy reason - I am not prepared to provide you with personal details just to satisfy your bloodthirst. The admin I have revealed information to is watching this discussion - if he wishes to be the closing admin on this
1776:
Ok, then, so if you are simply going to ignore my request that you ask SB67 to log on and explain his motivations (and, of course, It doesn't take a genius to work out why you might rather than not happen), then perhaps you could tell us which admin you provided your irrefutable evidence to. I'll ask
1497:
Yes, you are absolutely correct with regards to TamB (and to a lesser extent, the evidence against maplecelt is also circumstantial). I mentioned the coincidence only in passing, and it would be wrong to read anything more into that. However, there is clear evidence that at least two other members of
1482:
All that being said, the www.celticminded.com forum evidence is the strongest and it doesn't appear to bode well for
Vintagekits. I do find it odd that while "Sligobhoy67" asked for voting assistance on www.celticminded.com the person with that username on Knowledge (XXG) hasn't voted on any AfDs. As
1362:
No one is suggestion mailing another editor is a crime. However, recruiting meatpuppets for the purposes of votestacking is against policy. I asked Coeur-sang is she has received a communication asking her to do that and she said she hadn't. I believe the evidence above shows that is not true. If you
852:
Frankly I'm insulted the
EliminatorJR accused me of being a sock puppet i'm a real person currently living in Sarnia, Ontario, Canada. I have a degree in History and Political Science from the UNiversity of Western Ontario so I think my opinions are as valid as anyone elses. I was born in Scotland
408:
Celticminded.com is a web forum about Celtic F.C., the subject of the AfD that sparked this report. Sligobhoy67 (hereafter abbreviated to SB67) edits there regularly. Over a period of time, SB67 has made threads at
Celticminded asking if other members of the board use Knowledge (XXG). Examples of the
564:
To follow on for from the
Antoine MacGiolla Bhrighde that a bunch of huns tried to get deleted off wiki, they are now trying to get the article for Martin McCaughey deleted. Can I ask you to do two things. 1. Go and vote to keep the article 2. if you have any more info on Martin please add it to the
504:
I could find no direct evidence linking TamB and
Maplecelt to requests for assistance in votestacking. However, Maplecelt certainly contributes to a number of Celtic fora, including Huddlehound and Kerrydale St, therefore considering the strong evidence of using such fora for vote stacking purposes,
1666:
Given our history, I am not the proper person to close this, but I find the evidence compelling. I suggest that if we hear no more from
Vintagekits about the matter in 24 hours or so, we consider his silence an admission of guilt. I have messaged him reminding him that this case isn't going to just
1442:
For my part, I have nothing against you and my !votes on AfD's you have taken part in tend to be 50/50 in support. I also find the behaviour of those in perpetual opposition to you abhorrant, so please don't paint this as some sort of partisan attack on you. The information above was provided to me
617:
I should add that on those threads at celticminded, at least two other members indicated that they had contributed to the AfDs a manner that SB67 has requested. There are no obvious link between those individuals names at
Celticminded and the individuals names listed here, but it would suggest that
1348:
You are rather missing the point - half of
Knowledge (XXG)'s business is conducted off wiki on IRC. Mailing another editor is not a wiki-crime. Why do you think the email facility is there, and for what reason - for editors to discuss the weather with each other? I think you need to be realistic.
1224:
As a relatively new member I have no idea what you are talking about re sockpuppets and meat puppets but not so dumb that I can't work out for myself the intended insult. I was not pre warned that I was only allowed to work in areas where there was no prior interest by other members! I DO NOT know
945:
to allow any contentious AfDs to be discussed by neutral parties which didn't happen for one reason or another, and have stayed almost totally clear of any such AfDs since because it's practically a waste of time trying to get any articles deleted with the votestacking and canvassing that goes on.
530:
I propose
Vintagekits is clearly in violation of this. While this behaviour is unacceptable, it should also be noted that there appears to be a similar meatpuppetry going on by editors who are in perpetual conflict with Vintagekits. This does not excuse his behaviour, but it perhaps explains it. I
1830:
I have corresponded with Vintagekits who gave me additional information which did not, in my opinion, alter the evidence. Due to the pattern of editing, as well as off-Wiki forum postings, it is clear to me that these accounts are either sock puppets of VK or are meat puppets controlled by him. I
342:
who commented on the same AfD, and had a very similar pattern of editing - very few edits, then a burst of commenting on AfDs. Of the four AfDs that Maplecelt commented on, three of them were the same one as Coeur-sang. Now, of course, there is the possibility that Coeur-sang and Maplecelt are
1738:
Its not difficult to edit from two different countries on the same day. There are things called airplanes that facilitate this. The checkuser compared the editing from both you and SB67, and came to the conclusion that it is "likely" that you and SB67 is the the same person. That means there is
527:
It is considered highly inappropriate to advertise Knowledge (XXG) articles in order to attract users with known views in an attempt to strengthen one side of a debate. It is also considered inappropriate to ask friends or family members to create accounts for the purpose of giving additional
448:) who edits here at Knowledge (XXG), a look at his contributions shows an almost complete crossover in editing space with Vintagekits. As interesting as all of this is, it is mere conjecture except they are the same individual. Except SB67, in response to a question on Celticminded about
1528:
in a 4 month window) to support an argument VK is having. I think taken together this strongly suggests Sligobhoy67 is a sock of Vintagekits, though I guess its possible that it is simply another meatpuppet. I might be worth requesting a checkuser to see if we can link SB67 with
1603:
Nobody is stopping anybody investigating, and if there is evidence of bad behaviour on both sides I would recommend taking the case to arbcom and I think there is a case for not taking furhter action against Vintage until the other side of the case is more fully investigated,
1057:
How so. You mean just expressing similar opinions to someonme else makes someone a meatpuppet? Like you and Vintage? Codex and I? Those who oppose thew Brandt article and those who support it (2 massive armies of meatpuppets). As I say please stop making silly suggestions,
1253:
The first communication I recieved from a wiki person was this accusation. I don't know anyone who has any involvement here. I have no interest in getting into this as I feel it is a complete waste of my time to answer charges that I'm not even sure I know the meaning
497:
edits, again to an AfD of Vintagekit's. When asked (below) if he had received communications from another Wikipedians about votestacking, Coeur-sang is explicit in his denial. I would ask him to consider whether he may like to reconsider that answer in light of this
1106:
how is it not that simple? its amazing this site has as many people if when the want to start making contributions they are attacked because people don't like others points of view. sort of defeats the purpose. I'm going to bed before I say something I
1532:
The specific AfD's coeur-sang replied about were never publically mentioned, though SB67 said he would "contact" the people who volunteered to help with details. However the time and date of the posts makes it pretty obvious what they correspond to
873:
I fail to see what the issue is with what I wrote about the name of the falklands war. I don't think its anti british I think to call it just the falklands is a pro-british view. I think you may be talking it to hard because you are a british.
506:
1135:
1149:. I would be tempted to look at that as vindication that Vintagekits did not know Coeur-sang before that, although I suppose you could argue it could be an extremely clever ruse. In the end, I see it like this, either
1468:
and therefore it is possible that there are numerous people who use that term or a variation (e.g. TamBall20, TamBallBoy) as a username. In fact, that forum you link to lists that "Tam Ball" as being located in England
1133:
was opened by VK at 15:43, and Coeur-sang, who'd made 1 edit in the previous month, commented at 16.26, followed by Maplecelt, who hadn't edited for two weeks, an hour later. They then both immediately commented on
505:
it is not unreasonable to expect he was recruited in the same manner. I have no evidence for TamB, except the co-incidental posting on the same Kerrydale thread as Maplecelt, a member by the name of Tam Ball...
1483:
I have only seen the screenshots provided, did "Sligobhoy67" ever declare himself "Vintagekits" on that forum? Did "Sligobhoy67" ever specify any particular AfDs for votestacking or was that a one time comment?
349:
was registered in December 2006 and made only 6 edits up until 26 Apr 2007. Between then and today, they then commented on 5 AfDs, 4 of which were started by Vintagekits and agreeing with his delete !vote
1421:
1831:
will block these accounts indefinitely. VK has been blocked seven times since January, and also has a proven history of using sockpuppet accounts. The disposition of that account is best handled on AN/I.
42:
No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user,
1767:
There are other ways of editing in 2 different countries. Windows XP allows one user to control another's with the permission of the latter, and there are also free and pay softwares that do the same,
1505:. I would propose that Sligobhoy67 realised that having an overtly "fenian" name does not always help his cause. SligoBhoy67 registered here first and made a few edits, the last being in July 2006 to
401:
Some further evidence has been brought to my attention by a concerned editor that appears to explain what is going on here. Therefore I'm going to reproduce it below to allow the community to decide.
1479:
It is also entirely possible that the "Sligobhoy67" on www.celticminded.com was simply taking credit for something he had nothing whatsoever to do with. People do occasionally lie on the internet :)
853:
of Irish Catholic background why would I not have an interest in these topics. Also since between December and April 30th I was in school its a little hard to have the time take part in this site.
825:
the other three. Strange. Perhaps this is simply coincidence, or else there is a meatpuppet who is a not quite towing the party line, or there is some seriously sophisticated sockpuppetry going on.
665:
says El chulito, Jill Teed, Inthegloaming and Conrad Falk were all from the same person, who voted "delete". That plus the usual suspects who vote delete on any AfD about Irish republicans....
338:, but then looked a little closer at the edit history and had to agree that they did indeed suggest something dubious. The alarm bells really went off, though, when I looked at another user -
691:
How is that a problem? I don't think there is much doubt that there was votestacking to delete the article also, are you suggesting that validates VK's votestacking as a measure of response?
1720:
Do you have any explanation as to why someone calling themselves that name should say on a forum that he edits wikipedia as Vintagekits, rather than saying he edits by his own user name?
323:
1758:
If you think that I would edit wiki in one country - fly to another and immediately edit wiki in another country just a year later I could make some point on wiki then you are deluded!--
1234:
Coeur-sang, can you confirm therefore, that you have not received a communication, on or off wiki, from another editor asking you to !vote in one of the AfD's you have commented on?
485:. Note that this request was posted on Celticminded on 26-04-07. Coeur-sang's first contribution to Knowledge (XXG) was a delete vote on that day, in an AfD proposed by Vintagekits.
1613:
I have asked other admins to decide on what, if any, further action should be taken, as its not really fair for someone presenting the evidence to also act on it. The discussion is
756:
662:
267:
1614:
1424:). Can we assume good faith please? Vintagekits, you know quite well that if you'd seen evidence like this against an "opposition player" on AfD, you'd have come here too.
658:
1196:
Yes, you're quite right, it isn't a vote, but it's the phrase used for 'fixing' an AfD by getting a number of editors to !vote whose opinions on a subject are known - see
1078:
For having several opinions that concur with Vintage's and expressed in a way that would help Vintage push his POV in afds and other disputes, its all quite convincing,
1271:, I propose to you that is not entirely true. I would ask you to digest the further evidence above and consider if it might not the the time to reconsider your answer.
1097:
The issue is that you had very few edits and the ones you did tended to help Vintage's POV in a number of cases, and its not as simple as just having agreed with him,
510:
a thread asking for help on this site would be deleted instantly on KDS, as it would be against the rules. They are extremely strict on what can and cannot be posted.
1130:
44:
1584:
gives you some idea. Its unfortunate for VK that his contribution to the debacle has been revealed so fully, when there are others that have behaved just as poorly.
1312:" - people are jumping to too many conclusions here - I suspect that their style of writing is not the only diference between Vintagekits style and Coeur-sang.
1011:
Meatpuppet? If you are being serious please stop making silly accusations, I have been on wikipedia longer than pretty much anyone else involved in this issue,
1501:
As for the Knowledge (XXG) Sligobhoy67 anomaly. I would suggest the reason this has never been used in AfDs is made clear in SB67's request at Celticminded, "
1146:. However, looking more closely, this was well after Coeur-sang registered, but only 10 minutes after s/he had commented on an AfD Vintagekits was watching
378:
meanwhile, was registered on 27 April, the day after Maplecelt started commenting on AfDs, and commented on 3 AfDs - two of them the same ones as Maplecelt
912:
1536:. There are specific mentions of straw polls and debates on talkpages that SB urges others to votestack at, though. This includes, but is not limited to
590:
That ties in Maplecelt quite well, whose editing pattern shows exactly that - a few edits on random and local items, before ploughing into the AfDs.
894:) have been votestacking and attempting to subvert consensus in AfDs for months now including the use of glaringly obvious sock/meatpuppets such as
243:
72:
886:
I wouldn't say any of these are sockpuppets, especially not Maplecelt. This is only looking at one half of the AfDs in question anyway. A group of
434:). Moreover, he and SB67 share a number of interests including boxing, Irish republicanism and, of course, Celtic. In fact, there appears to be a
120:
714:
Not in the slightest. Someone mentioned the McCaughey AfD as evidence of sockpuppetry, I was happy to provide evidence that was indeed the case.
427:
426:(The red dots indicate the Knowledge (XXG) specific threads). Now, I don't know for sure but I strongly suspect Vintagekits is from Sligo (see
161:
1187:
If its not a vote how can it be vote stacking?. Second question I understand what a sockpuppet is now, but can I get a meatpuppet definition?
906:
1580:
Its hard to say. There appears to have been votestacking going on in the opposite direction also. I don't know who was behind that, but
1087:
so two people can't share the same view on an issue if you don't their position? I'm tired of this some of us have a job to get up for.
17:
1567:
declaring that he was Vintagekits. That answers that question. Were any particular AfDs swayed one way or the other from these votes?
1832:
445:
237:
202:
66:
972:
Unfortunately concluding that Vintage's opponents use socks doesnt help his case one bit, indeed it could explain his motivations,
1120:
A clarification - you don't get suspected as a sock/meatpuppet just for agreeing with someone's opinions, and I definitely try to
114:
985:
No, but considering you're one of the meatpuppets it explains your motivations for shouting "sockpuppet" without any evidence.
155:
1503:
REMEMBER - BEFORE you edit you have to register a name, NOT TOO FENIAN OR PROVO EITHER, I am called "VINTAGEKITS" on the site"
1415:
Er, hang on a second - attack page? If you look through my contribs you'll see that I've generally been on your side at AfD
1033:
994:
955:
723:
674:
1165:
e) they are different people but there is off-wiki communication, which means this is votestacking rather than meatpuppetry.
431:
1715:
If Sligobhoy67 is you, then giving the appearance of two different users in the same argument is an abusive use of socks.
473:
If you have used wiki then let my know or just reply here and I will contact you. I need help with a bit of voterigging!
930:
249:
78:
798:) should probably be considered too per his/her history of AfD comments, I've added this user to the list of suspects.
126:
1649:
1581:
887:
941:, it stands to reason that accounts from "the other side" will appear to vote on the AfDs in question. I suggested
918:
795:
196:
167:
1026:
987:
948:
716:
667:
255:
84:
900:
132:
1466:
1465:
A few thoughts: TamB doesn't necessarily stand for "Tam Ball". Moreover, a "Tam Ball" is a legitimate product
173:
1434:
1214:
1178:
821:
Oddly enough TamB appears exclusively at the same AfD's as those mentioned above, but occasionally !votes
600:
291:
895:
383:- plus another Arbuthnott AfD not started by Vintagekits, but on which he'd !voted and agreeing with him
1841:
1838:
1801:
1791:
1771:
1762:
1753:
1733:
1724:
1710:
1697:
1671:
1658:
1631:
1608:
1598:
1575:
1554:
1491:
1457:
1437:
1407:
1377:
1353:
1339:
1325:
Then I suggest you too read the further evidence. The difference between them is no longer in question.
1316:
1285:
1258:
1248:
1229:
1217:
1191:
1181:
1111:
1101:
1091:
1082:
1072:
1062:
1041:
1015:
1002:
976:
963:
878:
857:
839:
812:
773:
731:
705:
682:
632:
612:
603:
585:
545:
528:
support. Advertising or soliciting meatpuppet activity is not an acceptable practice on Knowledge (XXG).
514:
511:
439:
312:
294:
231:
208:
60:
482:
A member of Celticminded responds to SB67's request for meatpuppets. This member is called Coeur-sang.
1786:
1748:
1692:
1626:
1593:
1549:
1452:
1372:
1334:
1280:
1243:
834:
807:
768:
700:
627:
580:
540:
307:
108:
1197:
343:
sock/meat puppets of each other, and nothing to do with Vintagekits, but there are further links...
149:
1573:
1489:
387:
366:
214:
1143:
However, to be fair, I did note this; Coeur-sang was welcomed to Knowledge (XXG) by Vintagekits
475:
457:
1426:
1206:
1170:
592:
330:'s edit history looked suspicious in that it had few edits, but those on AfDs all agreed with
283:
1201:
522:
1835:
1798:
1759:
1730:
1707:
1680:
1537:
1404:
1363:
choose not to believe that evidence it is your choice, but I personally find it compelling.
435:
331:
226:
55:
27:
1121:
489:
483:
422:
335:
1778:
1740:
1684:
1618:
1585:
1541:
1510:
1444:
1364:
1326:
1272:
1255:
1235:
1226:
826:
799:
760:
692:
619:
572:
532:
375:
327:
299:
103:
424:
1768:
1605:
1513:
1506:
1470:
1188:
1108:
1098:
1088:
1079:
1069:
1059:
1012:
973:
875:
865:
What you mean the Falklands war as for me it was your edit there that smacks of sockpup
854:
789:
609:
346:
339:
190:
144:
1153:
a) none of the accounts have anything to do with each other (unlikely given the diffs)
36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry.
1721:
1568:
1564:
1484:
1350:
1313:
559:
449:
1473:
1024:
And your point is? It doesn't stop you being a meatpuppet in the AfDs in question.
892:
that information needs updating with additional editors, AfDs and canvassing also
421:
The forum itself requires registration so I provide screen dumps for convenience
1653:
1729:
Like I said I am happy to provide the close admin with the full information.--
1162:
d) the suspected sockpuppets are linked to each other with no puppetmaster, or
657:
One slight problem with that argument, where are the sock/meatpuppets on the
1668:
785:
185:
1308:
Sir??? - I would advise caution as to gender - consider the phrase above "
459:
The creator and major editor of that article is, of course, Vintagekits.
1068:
To be fair I'm being accused of being a sockpuppet for having an opinion
488:
Note also the date of another of SB67's requests on that forum: 12-06-7
369:, another pet favourite of Vintagekits, and again agreeing with his POV
661:? That's actually a rhetorical question, as I already know the answer.
454:
it is indeed a chara - infact i wrote an article about him on wikipedia
618:
there were at least three meatpuppets recruited from celticminded...
465:
SligoBhoy67/Vintagekits admits intent to vote stack with meatpuppets.
480:
Coeur-sang responds to SligoBhoy67/Vintagekits request to votestack.
566:
359:, and one agreeing with his Keep vote in the AfD mentioned above.
1124:
at all times. However, there is definitely an odd pattern here.
1200:. A meatpuppet is a real person who acts as a sockpuppet - see
1512:
On August 1st, Vintagekits registered, his first edit being to
753:
Checkuser finds it is "likely" that Vintagekits is Sligobhoy67
553:
One more thing to wrap up any dispute that SB67 is Vintagekits
1310:
If I edit I'm a witch and if I don't... well burn her anyway
386:, before then also pitching in with a keep on the heated
1718:
1716:
1534:
1521:
1516:
1418:
1416:
1147:
1144:
942:
936:
924:
757:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for checkuser/Case/Vintagekits
608:
except that I've never been on Celticminded in my life.
495:
492:
486:
460:
391:
384:
381:
379:
370:
363:
360:
357:
355:
353:
351:
268:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for checkuser/Case/Vintagekits
261:
220:
179:
138:
90:
1683:(who commented at AN/I) if he would consider closing.
888:
British editors interested in the monarchy and peerage
491:, this date is co-incident with Coeur-sang's fifth
406:
VintageKits is SligoBhoy67 at www.celticminded.com.
1420:- indeed I've even started Arbuthnot AfDs myself (
1524:. Sligobhoy67 makes his next edit (indeed, his
562:
8:
1159:c) They are sock/meatpuppets of someone else
322:This was prompted by a revert war on this
419:Anyone have a history of editing on wiki?
567:http://en.wikipedia.org/Martin_McCaughey
502:Are Maplecelt and TamB also meatpuppets?
520:Meatpuppetry is in violation of policy.
415:has anyone got an account on wikipedia
18:Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets
7:
1509:, he then disappeared for a while.
1156:b) they are sock/meatpuppets of VK
24:
1476:"Tam Ball" located in Scotland.
326:in which a user insinuated that
1777:him or her to close the case.
1650:User:One Night In Hackney/Temp
1582:User:One Night In Hackney/Temp
334:. I reported the edit war to
1:
558:A SB67 post at Celticminded
1860:
362:. They also made an edit
47:for detailed instructions.
1842:04:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
1802:11:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
1792:00:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
1772:21:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
1763:21:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
1754:21:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
1734:20:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
1725:20:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
1711:19:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
1698:17:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
1672:17:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
1659:22:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1632:00:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
1609:22:56, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1599:21:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1576:21:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1555:21:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1492:20:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1458:17:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1438:17:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1408:16:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1378:17:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1354:08:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1340:06:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1317:06:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1286:06:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1259:19:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1249:17:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1230:13:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1218:13:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1192:13:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1182:08:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1112:04:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1102:04:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1092:04:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1083:04:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1073:04:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1063:03:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1042:03:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1016:03:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
1003:03:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
977:03:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
964:03:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
879:03:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
858:03:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
840:01:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
813:00:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
774:01:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
732:17:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
706:17:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
683:17:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
633:17:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
613:13:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
604:07:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
586:07:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
546:05:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
515:14:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
313:05:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
295:23:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
39:Please do not modify it.
1563:OK. I must have missed
1401:My one and only comment
1198:WP:CANVASS#Votestacking
469:Any wikipedia users on?
467:In the thread entitled
411:Any wikipedia users on?
51:Suspected sockpuppeteer
1565:the screenshot of SB67
1118:More comments from nom
570:
409:thread titles include
99:Suspected sockpuppets
1648:: I am mentioned on
1028:One Night In Hackney
989:One Night In Hackney
950:One Night In Hackney
718:One Night In Hackney
669:One Night In Hackney
659:Martin McCaughey AfD
390:AfD mentioned above
278:Report submission by
1474:here is a different
1202:WP:MEAT#Meatpuppets
943:a proposed solution
388:Bhoys from Seville
367:Talk:Falklands War
1270:
1122:assume good faith
1851:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1656:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1538:Martin McCaughey
1520:Also, note this
1455:
1451:
1447:
1432:
1429:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1268:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1212:
1209:
1176:
1173:
1040:
1036:
1029:
1001:
997:
990:
962:
958:
951:
940:
913:deleted contribs
867:
866:
837:
833:
829:
810:
806:
802:
771:
767:
763:
730:
726:
719:
703:
699:
695:
681:
677:
670:
630:
626:
622:
598:
595:
583:
579:
575:
543:
539:
535:
397:Further evidence
332:User:Vintagekits
310:
306:
302:
289:
286:
265:
244:deleted contribs
224:
203:deleted contribs
183:
162:deleted contribs
142:
121:deleted contribs
94:
73:deleted contribs
41:
28:User:Vintagekits
1859:
1858:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1654:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1430:
1427:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1210:
1207:
1174:
1171:
1039:
1034:
1027:
1025:
1000:
995:
988:
986:
961:
956:
949:
947:
898:
835:
831:
827:
808:
804:
800:
769:
765:
761:
729:
724:
717:
715:
701:
697:
693:
680:
675:
668:
666:
628:
624:
620:
596:
593:
581:
577:
573:
541:
537:
533:
376:User:Coeur-sang
328:User:Coeur-sang
324:very heated AfD
308:
304:
300:
287:
284:
229:
188:
147:
106:
58:
37:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1857:
1855:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1827:
1826:
1821:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1558:
1557:
1530:
1518:
1514:Carmel Gunning
1507:Carmel Gunning
1499:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1440:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1357:
1356:
1343:
1342:
1320:
1319:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1269:(my apologies)
1263:With respect,
1222:
1221:
1220:
1167:
1166:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1141:
1140:
1115:
1114:
1104:
1076:
1075:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1031:
1019:
1018:
1006:
1005:
992:
980:
979:
967:
966:
953:
896:Alastair Noble
871:
870:
869:
868:
850:
849:
845:
844:
843:
842:
816:
815:
782:
781:
777:
776:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
721:
709:
708:
686:
685:
672:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
549:
548:
517:
508:
499:
477:
471:, SB67 notes,
462:
399:
398:
347:User:Maplecelt
340:User:Maplecelt
320:
319:
280:
279:
274:
271:
225:
184:
143:
101:
100:
95:
53:
52:
49:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1856:
1843:
1840:
1837:
1834:
1829:
1828:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1803:
1800:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1790:
1782:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1770:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1761:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1752:
1744:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1732:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1717:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1709:
1705:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1696:
1688:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1673:
1670:
1665:
1661:
1660:
1657:
1651:
1647:
1633:
1630:
1622:
1616:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1607:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1597:
1589:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1574:
1572:
1571:
1566:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1556:
1553:
1545:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1517:
1515:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1490:
1488:
1487:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1459:
1456:
1448:
1441:
1439:
1436:
1435:
1433:
1423:
1422:like this one
1419:
1417:
1414:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1398:
1379:
1376:
1368:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1355:
1352:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1341:
1338:
1330:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1318:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1287:
1284:
1276:
1266:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1247:
1239:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1228:
1223:
1219:
1216:
1215:
1213:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1177:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1155:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1148:
1145:
1139:
1137:
1132:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1123:
1119:
1113:
1110:
1105:
1103:
1100:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1090:
1085:
1084:
1081:
1074:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1061:
1043:
1038:
1037:
1030:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1004:
999:
998:
991:
984:
983:
982:
981:
978:
975:
971:
970:
969:
968:
965:
960:
959:
952:
944:
938:
935:
932:
929:
926:
923:
920:
917:
914:
911:
908:
905:
902:
897:
893:
889:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
877:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
856:
847:
846:
841:
838:
830:
824:
820:
819:
818:
817:
814:
811:
803:
797:
794:
791:
787:
784:
783:
779:
778:
775:
772:
764:
758:
754:
751:
750:
733:
728:
727:
720:
713:
712:
711:
710:
707:
704:
696:
690:
689:
688:
687:
684:
679:
678:
671:
664:
660:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
634:
631:
623:
616:
615:
614:
611:
607:
606:
605:
602:
601:
599:
589:
588:
587:
584:
576:
571:
569:
568:
560:
557:
556:
554:
551:
550:
547:
544:
536:
529:
524:
521:
518:
516:
513:
512:65.95.129.159
509:
507:
503:
500:
496:
493:
490:
487:
484:
481:
478:
476:
474:
470:
466:
463:
461:
458:
455:
451:
450:Martin Savage
447:
444:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
423:
420:
416:
412:
407:
404:
403:
402:
396:
395:
394:
392:
389:
385:
382:
380:
377:
373:
371:
368:
364:
361:
358:
356:
354:
352:
348:
344:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
317:
316:
315:
314:
311:
303:
297:
296:
293:
292:
290:
277:
276:
275:
272:
269:
263:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
245:
242:
239:
236:
233:
228:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
187:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
146:
140:
137:
134:
131:
128:
125:
122:
119:
116:
113:
110:
105:
98:
97:
96:
92:
89:
86:
83:
80:
77:
74:
71:
68:
65:
62:
57:
50:
48:
46:
40:
34:
33:
29:
26:
19:
1820:
1703:
1676:
1675:
1663:
1662:
1645:
1644:
1569:
1525:
1502:
1485:
1481:
1478:
1464:
1425:
1412:
1400:
1309:
1264:
1205:
1169:
1168:
1142:
1128:
1117:
1116:
1086:
1077:
1056:
1032:
993:
954:
933:
927:
921:
915:
909:
903:
891:
872:
851:
822:
792:
752:
722:
673:
591:
563:
561:
552:
526:
519:
501:
479:
472:
468:
464:
453:
442:
418:
414:
410:
405:
400:
374:
345:
321:
298:
282:
281:
273:
258:
252:
246:
240:
234:
217:
211:
205:
199:
193:
176:
170:
164:
158:
152:
135:
129:
123:
117:
111:
102:
87:
81:
75:
69:
63:
54:
38:
35:
1836:Will Beback
1825:Conclusions
1799:Vintagekits
1760:Vintagekits
1731:Vintagekits
1708:Vintagekits
1681:Will Beback
1667:go away. --
1405:Vintagekits
436:Sligobhoy67
227:Sligobhoy67
56:Vintagekits
1428:Eliminator
1256:Coeur-sang
1227:Coeur-sang
1208:Eliminator
1172:Eliminator
931:block user
925:filter log
594:Eliminator
494:and sixth
452:, replied
285:Eliminator
256:block user
250:page moves
215:block user
209:page moves
174:block user
168:page moves
133:block user
127:page moves
104:Coeur-sang
85:block user
79:page moves
1769:SqueakBox
1606:SqueakBox
1526:only edit
1189:Maplecelt
1129:Example:
1109:Maplecelt
1107:shouldn't
1099:SqueakBox
1089:Maplecelt
1080:SqueakBox
1070:Maplecelt
1060:SqueakBox
1013:SqueakBox
974:SqueakBox
937:block log
876:Maplecelt
855:Maplecelt
663:Checkuser
610:Maplecelt
498:evidence.
262:block log
221:block log
180:block log
145:Maplecelt
139:block log
91:block log
45:read this
1780:Rockpock
1742:Rockpock
1722:Tyrenius
1686:Rockpock
1620:Rockpock
1587:Rockpock
1570:IrishGuy
1543:Rockpock
1486:IrishGuy
1472:whereas
1446:Rockpock
1366:Rockpock
1328:Rockpock
1274:Rockpock
1237:Rockpock
1136:this AfD
1131:this AfD
907:contribs
848:Comments
828:Rockpock
801:Rockpock
796:contribs
780:Comments
762:Rockpock
694:Rockpock
621:Rockpock
574:Rockpock
534:Rockpock
446:contribs
318:Evidence
301:Rockpock
238:contribs
197:contribs
156:contribs
115:contribs
67:contribs
1704:Comment
1677:Comment
1664:Comment
1646:Comment
823:against
525:states
523:WP:SOCK
1655:Bastun
1267:madam
755:. See
336:WP:ANI
266:(see:
1413:Reply
1351:Giano
1314:Giano
16:<
1833:·:·
1669:John
1615:here
1522:diff
919:logs
901:talk
790:talk
786:TamB
440:talk
432:here
430:and
428:here
417:and
232:talk
191:talk
186:TamB
150:talk
109:talk
61:talk
1839:·:·
1529:VK?
1265:sir
1254:of!
1035:303
996:303
957:303
725:303
676:303
365:to
1540:.
1431:JR
1211:JR
1204:.
1175:JR
759:.
597:JR
555::
456:.
413:,
393:.
372:.
288:JR
1788:t
1784:e
1750:t
1746:e
1694:t
1690:e
1628:t
1624:e
1595:t
1591:e
1551:t
1547:e
1454:t
1450:e
1374:t
1370:e
1336:t
1332:e
1282:t
1278:e
1245:t
1241:e
1138:.
939:)
934:·
928:·
922:·
916:·
910:·
904:·
899:(
890:(
836:t
832:e
809:t
805:e
793:·
788:(
770:t
766:e
702:t
698:e
629:t
625:e
582:t
578:e
542:t
538:e
443:·
438:(
309:t
305:e
270:)
264:)
259:·
253:·
247:·
241:·
235:·
230:(
223:)
218:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
189:(
182:)
177:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
141:)
136:·
130:·
124:·
118:·
112:·
107:(
93:)
88:·
82:·
76:·
70:·
64:·
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.